No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 15, 2026.
MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11
Koichiro Tamura, Glen Stecher, Sudhir Kumar
Molecular Biology and Evolution · 2021 · CC BY
Abstract
The Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software has matured to contain a large collection of methods and tools of computational molecular evolution. Here, we describe new additions that make MEGA a more comprehensive tool for building timetrees of species, pathogens, and gene families using rapid relaxed-clock methods. Methods for estimating divergence times and confidence intervals are implemented to use probability densities for calibration constraints for node-dating and sequence sampling dates for tip-dating analyses. They are supported by new options for tagging sequences with spatiotemporal sampling information, an expanded interactive Node Calibrations Editor, and an extended Tree Explorer to display timetrees. Also added is a Bayesian method for estimating neutral evolutionary probabilities of alleles in a species using multispecies sequence alignments and a machine learning method to test for the autocorrelation of evolutionary rates in phylogenies. The computer memory requirements for the maximum likelihood analysis are reduced significantly through reprogramming, and the graphical user interface has been made more responsive and interactive for very big data sets. These enhancements will improve the user experience, quality of results, and the pace of biological discovery. Natively compiled graphical user interface and command-line versions of MEGA11 are available for Microsoft Windows, Linux, and macOS from www.megasoftware.net.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 15, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
The Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software has continuously grown to meet the need for sophisticated evolutionary analysis to discover organismal and genome evolutionary patterns and processes. It was first released in 1993 to offer the statistical methods of molecular evolution through an interactive interface on the Microsoft Disk Operating System (MS-DOS). For more than 25 years, MEGA’s scope and usefulness have grown through the addition of new methods, tools, and interfaces, resulting in modern integrated software for comparative sequence analysis. Initially, MEGA contained distance-based and maximum parsimony methods for molecular phylogenetic analysis. The data acquisition and integration of major approaches for aligning sequences were introduced to expand MEGA's scope. Afterward, the maximum likelihood (ML) methods and Bayesian methods were added for molecular evolutionary analyses. MEGA now contains methods for selecting the best-fit substitution model(s), estimating evolutionary distances and divergence times, reconstructing phylogenies, predicting ancestral sequences, testing for selection, and diagnosing disease mutations.
With every new version, MEGA has evolved to harness technological innovations and personal desktops' computational power. MEGA’s interface evolved from its initial MS-DOS character-based format to a rich graphical user interface (GUI) for Microsoft Windows operating system. It was then redesigned to become activity-driven, followed by the incorporation of web technologies to ensure a consistent use-and-feel across Microsoft Windows and Linux operating systems and macOS. MEGA GUI is now fully cross-platform running natively on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
MEGA’s computational core (MEGA-CC) has undergone extensive refactoring, hardening, and expansion over time. It advanced from 16-bit to 32-bit, became multithreaded and incorporated multicore parallelization for various calculations, and stepped up to 64-bit architecture. MEGA-CC was released for use as a command-line program to address the growing need for batch processing of many data sets and integration into analysis workflows. With both 32- and 64-bit versions of MEGA currently available for use on the command-line and GUI, MEGA is now a suite of applications that responds to the variety of computing environments currently used by researchers in molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Here, we present key methodological additions and technical improvements in MEGA that comprise version 11.
Expansion of Relaxed-Clock Dating Facilities
Rapid relaxed-clock methods for estimating divergence times are becoming popular because they are feasible and efficient for large contemporary sequence alignments. MEGA6 first added methods and tools for constructing evolutionary timetrees by implementing the RelTime method, which does not assume a molecular clock. RelTime is known to perform well and has been used to build timetrees in hundreds of research articles. MEGA11 expands on RelTime dating options by advancing the current implementation and adding new facilities for node-dating and tip-dating needed to build timetrees of pathogens, species, and gene families.
Calibrating the Clock Using Probability Densities on Node-Constraints
Bayesian relaxed-clock methods have long allowed the use of statistical probability distributions that capture prior knowledge (or belief) about the true divergence times in clock calibration constraints on one or more nodes in the phylogeny. Judicious use of these probability densities can make divergence times more accurate and precise. Researchers can now use such probability densities for node calibrations in RelTime estimation of divergence times and confidence intervals (CIs). MEGA implements the ) approach that estimates CIs by simultaneously accounting for variance introduced by the heterogeneity of evolutionary rate among lineages, estimation of sequence divergence using substitution models, and probability densities for node-calibration constraints. This method produces CIs that contain correct times with a high probability, making them much more suitable for biological hypothesis testing than other rapid methods.
For RelTime analyses in MEGA11, ML and distance-based approaches can be used to build a timetree for a given phylogeny and multiple sequence alignment. One may also use only a phylogeny with branch lengths, which extends the usefulness of relaxed-clock methods for phylogenies inferred from nonmolecular data or statistical methodologies not available in MEGA. When a phylogeny with branch lengths is used, the CIs will be narrower because the variance associated with branch length estimation cannot be generated without the original data set used to produce the phylogeny and branch lengths. Nevertheless, these CIs will incorporate variance introduced due to rate variation among lineages and clock calibrations’ uncertainty.
A calibration density selector has been added to the Node Calibration Editor that provides an option to select normal, lognormal, uniform, or exponential density (fig. 1). The user can also specify a minimum or a maximum time bound on a node. The calibration text file format has been extended to specify density information and use calibration densities in MEGA-CC. The Node Calibration Editor also includes new functionality to specify a fixed evolutionary rate or a known node time to calibrate the molecular clock. Such assumptions are often used by investigators when independent calibration information is unknown.
Tip-Dating for Sequences with Sampling Times
MEGA now implements a method to estimate timetrees using sampling dates for molecular sequences. They are often used to infer the origin and diversification of pathogens that generally evolve fast enough to track the evolutionary change over months and years. Tip-dating methods are also useful for analyzing ancient molecular sequences. MEGA implements a rapid tip-dating method, RelTime with Dated Tips (RTDT), that produces divergence times and CIs. One may use ML or distance-based approaches for a given phylogeny and multiple sequence alignment for tip-dating, or a phylogeny with branch lengths and tip dates can be given as the input.
An enhanced Timetree Wizard system (fig. 2) walks the user through many steps needed to configure tip-dating analyses, such as loading sequence and tree files, specifying the outgroups, adding sequence sample times, and selecting the analysis options. Sequence sampling times can be specified in multiple ways. MEGA will automatically extract them on-demand when they are included in the sequence name. Spatiotemporal information can also be presented in the input alignment files as meta tags (see description below) or loaded using specially formatted calibration text files. Once computed, the timetree is displayed in the Tree Explorer that has been extensively revamped and updated (fig. 3). It now has many more formatting tools, including exporting the timetree, individual divergence times, and CI estimates in a tabular format.
Detecting Autocorrelation of Evolutionary Rates
MEGA now contains a facility for detecting autocorrelation of evolutionary rates among branches, which is important for understanding molecular evolution patterns and useful as a clock rate prior in Bayesian relaxed-clock analyses. MEGA implements the CorrTest method developed using machine learning, which is accurate and computationally efficient. The CorrTest implementation in MEGA requires a phylogeny with sequence alignment (or branch lengths) and is accessed through an easy-to-use wizard. This test's final output is a CorrScore between 0 and 1 and a P-value, where a high CorrScore and low P-value indicates that branch rates among lineages are likely correlated.
Calculating Neutral Evolutionary Probabilities
According to the neutral theory of molecular evolution, most differences in molecular sequences across species are expected to have little to no impact on fitness. Therefore, multispecies sequence alignments have been used to estimate neutral evolutionary probabilities (EP) of observing alternative alleles (amino acid residues or nucleotides) in a species, contingent on the given species timetree. MEGA implements an advanced option for this Bayesian approach in which the species timetree containing relative times is computed automatically by using RelTime. Alleles with EP less than 0.05 are nonneutral, whereas evolutionary permissible (neutral) alleles show much higher EPs. Disease-associated amino acid variants in human populations have EP < 0.05 and are rarely found in the population. Many human adaptive variants in populations also have low EPs, that is, nonneutral from an evolutionary perspective, but they show high allele frequencies. Therefore, one may use EPs to diagnose disease mutations and detect candidate adaptive variants. An EP wizard system walks the user through the steps required to set up the analysis. The first sequence in the alignment is used automatically as the focal taxon of interest (one can rearrange sequences in the Sequence Data Explorer). EP values for all possible bases (4 for nucleotides and 20 for amino acids) at each position in the input sequence alignment are reported in a spreadsheet or text format.
Technological Advances
Although some new user interface elements have already been mentioned above (figs. 1–3), additional technical advances in MEGA11 are as follows.
Expanded Group Designations
MEGA has long supported a “group” tag for sequences and other operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Using the sequence “group” tags, MEGA offered a group-wise exploration of input data, selection of data subsets, and computational analyses. Support for two new tags (“population” and “species”) was added in MEGA7, with the species tags used to mark duplicate genes in multigene family phylogenies. In MEGA11, sequences can now be tagged to provide information on the continent, country, city, year, month, day, and time. This spatiotemporal information can be used in tip-dating analyses.
In MEGA11, we have made a MEGA-wide change to use any meta tag to define groups. For example, if one selects the “Year” meta tag for use as a group, they could estimate average diversity within and between sequences sampled in different years (Distance menu). In the Sequence Data Explorer, one can select/unselect sequences of certain years for phylogenetic analyses. Also, the display of years would be automatically enabled in the Tree Explorer, and the feature to collapse sequence clusters will be done by years. Additionally, sequences can be sorted based on years in all the input data and result explorer displays. Therefore, a dynamic designation of groups based on the desired meta tag will enable data exploration and analysis more efficiently.
Memory Efficient ML Analyses
ML methods are widely used for phylogenetic inference but place high demands on computer memory, becoming increasingly burdensome for bigger sequence alignments analyzed these days. In MEGA11, we have now completed a long-overdue refactoring of ML calculations by adding a step to identify common site configurations, that is, sites where all sequences have the same bases as at some other sites, to utilize computer memory more efficiently. The memory requirements of Maximum Likelihood and Maximum parsimony analysis are reduced (approximately) by the factor of m/L when there are m distinct site configurations in a sequence alignment containing L sites. The memory saving can be substantial for multigene and genome-scale alignments. For example, the memory saving was 660 MB (209 vs. 870 MB) for a sequence alignment of 229 birds with 2,728 sites and 4.5 GB (2.3 vs. 6.8 GB) for an alignment of 162 mammals with 11,010 sites. This memory saving does not have any detrimental impact on phylogenetic estimates and computational times because identical site configurations have the same likelihood value. The total log-likelihood is simply the sum of site-configuration log-likelihoods weighted by their frequencies. However, this upgrade required refactoring many different parts of MEGA’s calculation engine, including functions for phylogeny construction and model selection.
Enhanced GUI for Exploring Large Data Sets
Using a large multiple sequence alignment containing 68,000 genomes and 30,000 bases each, we assessed MEGA GUI's responsiveness during input data file reading, execution of functions in the Sequence Data Explorer, estimation of pairwise distances, and building of distance-based phylogenies. We found the GUI to become intermittently unresponsive for such large data sets, which are now common due to resequencing and population sequencing efforts. Consequently, we have moved all potentially long-running operations out of the main GUI thread to background threads in a major overhaul of the source code. Now, large input data files are read rapidly, and calculations of pairwise distance matrices, selection tests, and phylogeny construction for distance-based methods are performed in a background thread. The Sequence Data Explorer has been reprogrammed to enable more efficient highlighting of variable sites, and navigation of the sequence alignment has been improved. Also added are options to automatically label sites based on attributes, which annotates sites by providing a one-character label and then using desired labeled sites to subset data for any molecular phylogenetic analysis desired.
Conclusions
Version 11 of MEGA adds many methods and tools to keep pace with researchers' growing needs. The addition of evolutionary dating methods in MEGA make it easier to estimate species and strain divergence times by using more informative node calibrations and sampling times. The new CorrTest and EP calculations will enable a more robust evaluation of assumptions about biological characteristics of molecular data. The reduction in memory needs of ML-based computations will allow users to analyze much larger data sets than before. The refactoring of distance-based methods’ calculation to run in threads independent of the main graphical interface and other GUI enhancements greatly improve MEGA usability for very large data sets.
References 23
- 1.
Caspermeyer J. 2018. MEGA software celebrates silver anniversary. Mol Biol Evol. 35(6):1558–1560.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msy098
- 2.
Claramunt S, Cracraft J. 2015. A new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds. Sci Adv. 1(11):e1501005.
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.1501005
- 3.
Hipsley CA, Müller J. 2014. Beyond fossil calibrations: realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology. Front Genet. 5:138.
Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2014.00138
- 4.
Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Not in our library
- 5.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 35(6):1547–1549.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msy096
- 6.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Peterson D, Tamura K. 2012. MEGA-CC: computing core of molecular evolutionary genetics analysis program for automated and iterative data analysis. Bioinformatics28(20):2685–2686.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts507
- 7.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 33(7):1870–1874.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msw054
- 8.
Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen I, Nei M. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics17(12):1244–1245.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244
- 9.
Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 1.01. University Park (PA): The Pennsylvania State University.
Not in our library
- 10.
Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 1994. MEGA—molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software for microcomputers. Comput Appl Biosci. 10(2):189–191.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/10.2.189
- 11.
Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 2004. MEGA3: integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 5(2):150–163.
Not in our library10.1093/bib/5.2.150
- 12.
Liu L, Tamura K, Sanderford MD, Gray V, Kumar S. 2016. A molecular evolutionary reference or the human variome. Mol Biol Evol. 33(1):245–254.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msv198
- 13.
Meredith RW, Janečka JE, Gatesy J, Ryder OA, Fisher CA, Teeling EC, Goodbla A, Eizirik E, Simão TLL, Stadler T, et al2011. Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science334(6055):521–524.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1211028
- 14.
Miura S, Tamura K, Tao Q, Huuki LA, Pond SLK, Priest J, Deng J, Kumar S. 2018. A new method for inferring timetrees from temporally sampled molecular sequences. PLoS Comput Biol. 16:24.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007046
- 15.
Patel R, Kumar S. 2019. On estimating evolutionary probabilities of population variants. BMC Evol Biol. 19(1):133 (14 pp.).
Not in our library10.1186/s12862-019-1455-7
- 16.
Patel R, Scheinfeldt LB, Sanderford MD, Lanham TR, Tamura K, Platt A, Glicksberg BS, Xu K, Dudley JT, Kumar S. 2018. Adaptive landscape of protein variation in human exomes. Mol Biol Evol. 35(8):2015–2025.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msy107
- 17.
Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S. 2020. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol Biol Evol. 37(4):1237–1239.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msz312
- 18.
Tamura K, Battistuzzi FU, Billing-Ross P, Murillo O, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2012. Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109(47):19333–19338.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1213199109
- 19.
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 28(10):2731–2739.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msr121
- 20.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30(12):2725–2729.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/mst197
- 21.
Tao Q, Tamura K, Battistuzzi F, Kumar S. 2019. A machine learning method for detecting autocorrelation of evolutionary rates in large phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 36(4):811–824.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msz014
- 22.
Tao Q, Tamura K, Kumar S. 2020. Efficient methods for dating evolutionary divergences. In: Ho SYW, editor. The molecular evolutionary clock. Switzerland: Springer Nature. p. 197–219.
Not in our library
- 23.
Tao Q, Tamura K, Mello B, Kumar S. 2020. Reliable confidence intervals for RelTime estimates of evolutionary divergence times. Mol Biol Evol. 37(1):280–290.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msz236
Cited by papers we hold 32
- Identification and expression analysis of LRR-RLK genes reveal their roles in plant development and stress responses in Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) · 2025Not checked
- Identification and expression analysis of the BnE2F/DP gene family in Brassica napus · 2025Not checked
- Integrated Analysis of Olive Mill Wastewaters: Physicochemical Profiling, Antifungal Activity, and Biocontrol Potential Against <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> · 2025Not checked
- Single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the BK polyomavirus non-coding control region are genotype-associated · 2025Not checked
- Unveiling a New Species of Fanged Frog (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Southeastern Borneo, Indonesia · 2025Not checked
- Functional Identification and Transcriptional Activity Analysis of <i>Dryopteris fragrans HMGR</i> Gene · 2025Not checked
- Dataset on some chloroplast DNA regions of Strobilanthes bantonensis Lindau in VietnamMendeley Data · 2025Not checked
- Fine Scale Phylogeography of Urban Western European Hedgehog Erinaceus europaeus in South‐East England · 2025Not checked
- Characterization of two novel species of the genus Flagellimonas reveals the key role of vertical inheritance in the evolution of alginate utilization loci · 2025Not checked
- Molecular identification of Trichuris species in long-tailed macaques from Dong Ling Don Chao Pu Park and Kumphawapi Monkey Garden, Northeast Thailand: First report suggesting possible Trichuris ovis infection in non-human primates · 2025Not checked
- Molecular characterization of Neospora caninum major antigens NcSAG1 and NcSRS2 · 2025Not checked
- MEGA12: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis Version 12 for Adaptive and Green Computing · 2024No notice
- Genome-wide identification, structural and evolutionary characteristics, and expression analysis of aquaporin gene family members in Mercenaria mercenaria · 2023Not checked
- Translocator protein is a marker of activated microglia in rodent models but not human neurodegenerative diseases · 2023No notice
- Mitochondrial CPT1A: Insights into structure, function, and basis for drug development · 2023No notice
- Neuromicrobiology, an emerging neurometabolic facet of the gut microbiome? · 2023No notice
- Telomere-to-telomere assemblies of 142 strains characterize the genome structural landscape in Saccharomyces cerevisiae · 2023No notice
- Production of Helvolic Acid in Metarhizium Contributes to Fungal Infection of Insects by Bacteriostatic Inhibition of the Host Cuticular Microbiomes · 2022Not checked
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a dog with hemorrhagic diarrhea · 2022Not checked
- Forensic Characteristics and Genetic Background Dissections of Chinese Manchu and Zhuang Groups Using 59 Autosomal Diallelic InDels and 2 miniSTRs · 2022Not checked
and 12 more
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.