Signalling by potassium: another second messenger to add to the list?

Abstract

Cytosolic potassium homeostasis and the ability of various tissues to retain potassium under stress have emerged as important for salinity tolerance in plants, but recent evidence suggests that stress-induced K+ efflux may be equally important in mediating growth and development under hostile conditions. Here, the evidence is assessed, and the already-proposed concept of potassium efflux being a switch between metabolic and defence responses is developed. A new model is put forward which suggests signalling roles for cytosolic K+ changes, alongside well-known cytosolic Ca2+ and ROS ‘signatures’. Over the past decade, cytosolic potassium homeostasis and the ability of various plant tissues to retain potassium under stress conditions have emerged as novel and essential mechanisms of salinity stress tolerance in plants (reviewed by Shabala and Pottosin, 2014; Shabala et al., 2016a). Reported initially for barley roots (Chen et al., 2005, 2007a,b), a positive correlation between the overall salinity stress tolerance and the ability of root tissue to retain K+ was later expanded to other plant species such as wheat (Cuin et al., 2008, 2009), lucerne (Smethurst et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2016), pepper (Bojorquez-Quintal et al., 2016), cotton (Wang et al., 2016b), cucumber (Redwan et al., 2016), and Arabidopsis (Sun et al., 2015). This trait also explains the inter-specific variability in salinity stress tolerance (poplar – Sun et al., 2009; mangroves – Lu et al., 2013; Brassica – Chakraborty et al., 2016), and has recently emerged as a novel (and essentially overlooked) mechanism of salinity tissue tolerance in shoots (Wu et al., 2013, 2015). Differential K+ retention ability also confers differential salinity stress tolerance between halophytes and glycophytes (Percey et al., 2016). Electrophysiological and genetic studies have revealed that K+-selective, depolarization-activating outward-rectifying K+ channels (GORK channels in Arabidopsis) represent one of the major pathways of salinity-induced K+ efflux from plant cells (Demidchik, 2014; Pottosin and Dobrovynskaya, 2014; Shabala et al., 2016a). The GORK channel belongs to the so-called Shaker family of transporters. These are multimeric proteins with the trans-membrane core, forming the permeation pathway, composed of four subunits (Very et al., 2014). Similar to all K+-selective channels, the GORK channel bears a specific signature TxGYG (Thr-X-Gly-Tyr-Gly) in the pore loops (Sharma et al., 2013) that underlies its explicit K+ selectivity. The GORK channel is strongly voltage-gated (Very et al., 2014) and activated upon membrane depolarization and by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Demidchik et al., 2010). The essential nature of the K+ retention trait has moved well beyond salinity stress tolerance. For example, the capacity to maintain high cytosolic [K+] was shown to be critical for heavy metal tolerance (Murphy and Taiz, 1997). The recent paper from our laboratory has shown that Arabidopsis gork1-1 mutants lacking functional K+ efflux channels possess higher hypoxia stress tolerance (Wang et al., 2016a). Earlier, a similar conclusion was reached for oxidative stress tolerance (Demidchik et al., 2010). Thus, the ability of plant tissues to retain K+ seems to be a common feature of all stress-tolerant genotypes and species. If potassium retention is so essential for stress tolerance, why do plants have GORK channels? Wouldn’t it be more logical to eliminate them over the course of evolution? Can we ‘assist’ plants in doing this by knocking them out? Will it result in a stress-tolerant phenotype? Before these questions can be answered, GORK functional expression and regulation patterns should be considered at the tissue- and cell-specific level. To start with, GORK channels are expressed not only in the root epidermis but also in guard cells (hence the name GORK – Guard Cell Outward Rectifying K+ channels; Very et al., 2014) and play an important role in stomatal closure. In shoots, drought stress can cause up-regulation of GORK transcripts (Becker et al., 2003), and disruption of GORK activity resulted in impaired stomatal closure (Hosy et al., 2003) thus compromising the plant’s ability to retain water. Therefore, although having fewer functional GORK channels may help plants reduce K+ leakage from the root, the associated yield penalties due to the inability to adjust transpiration to conditions of hyperosmotic stress may override the benefits gained. Another puzzling piece of information is that plants respond to salinity stress by the increase in the GORK transcript level. For example, treating barley roots for 48 h with 100 mM NaCl has resulted in 3.5- to 5-fold increases in the GORK transcript level in barley roots (Adem et al., 2014), regardless of their salinity stress tolerance. In Brassica species, this increase was even higher (up to 8-fold in B. oleracea and B. juncea; Chakraborty et al., 2016). These observations seem to be counter-intuitive. If potassium retention is so crucial, why do plants invest in developing potassium leak pathways? What is the physiological rationale behind this phenomenon? First, in plant cells K+ operates as a charge-balancing ion. When plants are confronted with high salinity, uptake of Na+ causes a rapid and massive membrane depolarization (by 60–80 mV; Shabala et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007a). This has major implications for transport of various essential nutrients and metabolites. To restore the membrane potential, plants have two possible options: (1) to increase active H+-pumping, or (2) to use K+ efflux for charge balance. The second option comes at a lower energy cost and therefore may be preferred, at least in the short term. It should be mentioned in this context that the reported increase in GORK transcript levels in Brassica roots was accompanied by a concurrent increase in HAK5 transcript levels (Chakraborty et al., 2016). Interestingly, this increase was highest in salt-tolerant B. napus species, consistent with overall higher K+ tissue content in this species (Chakraborty et al., 2016) and suggesting a compensation mechanism. Thus, it appears that plants may use K+ efflux as a ‘safety valve’ to deal with initial membrane depolarization caused by salinity, until this role is gradually assumed by up-regulated H+-ATPases (Wu and Seliskar, 1998; Chen et al., 2007a; Alvarez-Pizarro et al., 2009), and then gradually regain K+ via high-affinity K+ transport systems (HATS). Potassium is also known as a determinant of cell fate (Shabala, 2009). High cytosolic K+ levels are essential for suppression of caspase-like proteases and endonucleases, and Arabidopsis mutants lacking functional GORK channels showed less programmed cell death (PCD) events compared with wild type, under both salinity and oxidative stress conditions (Demidchik et al., 2010). While cell elimination via PCD may generally be considered an undesirable trait, under some circumstances this process may be an essential component of acclimation (e.g. for aerenchyma formation in root cortex under hypoxic conditions; Shabala, 2011). Finally, K+ efflux may represent a ‘metabolic switch’ inhibiting energy-consuming anabolic reactions and saving energy for adaptation and repair. Termed a ‘metabolic hypothesis’ by Demidchik (2014), this concept needs to be proven in direct experiments. The physiological rationale behind it is that K+ is known to be an activator of a very large number (>70) of metabolic enzymes (Dreyer and Uozumi, 2011; Anschutz et al., 2014). Under control conditions, when cytosolic K+ concentrations are high, these enzymes are active and draw the major bulk of available energy towards the metabolic processes driven by these reactions (Box 1). When plants are confronted by stress conditions, they need to redirect a large pool of ATP towards defence reactions, even though ATP production declines dramatically. The only way to achieve this and avoid the competition for energy between metabolic and defence responses is to shut down cell metabolism. Decreasing the cytosolic [K+] to sub-threshold levels will inactivate numerous metabolic reactions, allowing a redistribution of the ATP pool towards defence responses (Box 1). The total pool of available energy is considered as 100% under control conditions and diminishes with increased stress severity (duration). When plant cell cytosolic [K+] is high (panel A) the major bulk of the pool is directed towards cell metabolism (70% in the model). As stress progresses, the amount of energy available for defence is quickly reduced to zero, and the cell dies (red area). If the cell uses K+ efflux as a metabolic switch and allocates only 30% of initially available energy for metabolism (panel B), cell death occurs much later. Can plants afford such a mechanism? The answer is yes, assuming the process is tightly controlled (see suggested model in Box 2) and several restrictions are in place. To start with, such rapid K+ efflux from the root should be confined to a relatively small root region, thereby ensuring that the overall root potassium nutritional status is not compromised. The root apex seems to be the most likely candidate for such a role (Box 2). First, cells in this zone are very active metabolically and thus best suited for the role of such a switch. Second, these cells show much higher sensitivity to salt, having an overall rate of K+ loss 10 to 30 times higher compared with mature zone cells (Shabala et al., 2016b). Third, root apical cells have less negative membrane potential (MP) compared with cells in the mature zone, reflecting lower H+-ATPase activity in this region (Shabala et al., 2016b), and thus should rely more on K+ efflux as a means of restoring membrane potential (MP). Fourth, the xylem tissue in this region is underdeveloped so the changes in the radial K+ fluxes will have no implications for long-distance K+ transport to the shoot. Finally, the overall volume of cells in the apex

References 37

1. 1.

   Adem GD, Roy SJ, Zhou M, Bowman JP, Shabala S 2014 Evaluating contribution of ionic, osmotic and oxidative stress components towards salinity tolerance in barley. BMC Plant Biology14, 113.

   Not in our library10.1186/1471-2229-14-113

2. 2.

   Alvarez-Pizarro JC, Gomes E, de Lacerda CF, Alencar NLM, Prisco JT 2009 Salt-induced changes on H+-ATPase activity, sterol and phospholipid content and lipid peroxidation of root plasma membrane from dwarf-cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation59, 125–135.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Anschütz U, Becker D, Shabala S 2014 Going beyond nutrition: Regulation of potassium homoeostasis as a common denominator of plant adaptive responses to environment. Journal of Plant Physiology171, 670–687.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2014.01.009

4. 4.

   Becker D, Hoth S, Ache P, Wenkel S, Roelfsema MRG, Meyerhoff O, Hartung W, Hedrich R 2003 Regulation of the ABA-sensitive Arabidopsis potassium channel gene GORK in response to water stress. FEBS Letters554, 119–126.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01118-9

5. 5.

   Bojorquez-Quintal E, Ruiz-Lau N, Velarde-Buendia A, Echevarria-Machado I, Pottosin I, Martinez-Estevez M 2016 Natural variation in primary root growth and K+ retention in roots of habanero pepper (Capsicum chinense) under salt stress. Functional Plant Biology43, 1114–1125.

   Not in our library10.1071/fp15391

6. 6.

   Chakraborty K, Bose J, Shabala L, Eyles A, Shabala S 2016 Evaluating relative contribution of osmotolerance and tissue tolerance mechanisms toward salinity stress tolerance in three Brassica species. Physiologia Plantarum158, 135–151.

   Not in our library10.1111/ppl.12447

7. 7.

   Chen Z, Newman I, Zhou M, Mendham N, Zhang G, Shabala S 2005 Screening plants for salt tolerance by measuring K+ flux: a case study for barley. Plant, Cell & Environment28, 1230–1246.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Chen Z, Pottosin II, Cuin TA 2007a Root plasma membrane transporters controlling K+/Na+ homeostasis in salt-stressed barley. Plant Physiology145, 1714–1725.

   Not in our library10.1104/pp.107.110262

9. 9.

   Chen ZH, Zhou MX, Newman IA, Mendham NJ, Zhang GP, Shabala S 2007b Potassium and sodium relations in salinised barley tissues as a basis of differential salt tolerance. Functional Plant Biology34, 150–162.

   Not in our library10.1071/fp06237

10. 10.

    Cuin TA, Betts SA, Chalmandrier R, Shabala S 2008 A root’s ability to retain K+ correlates with salt tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany59, 2697–2706.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ern128

11. 11.

    Cuin TA, Tian Y, Betts SA, Chalmandrier R, Shabala S 2009 Ionic relations and osmotic adjustment in durum and bread wheat under saline conditions. Functional Plant Biology36, 1110–1119.

    Not in our library10.1071/fp09051

12. 12.

    Demidchik V 2014 Mechanisms and physiological roles of K+ efflux from root cells. Journal of Plant Physiology171, 696–707.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2014.01.015

13. 13.

    Demidchik V, Cuin TA, Svistunenko D, Smith SJ, Miller AJ, Shabala S, Sokolik A, Yurin V 2010 Arabidopsis root K+-efflux conductance activated by hydroxyl radicals: single-channel properties, genetic basis and involvement in stress-induced cell death. Journal of Cell Science123, 1468–1479.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.064352

14. 14.

    Dreyer I, Uozumi N 2011 Potassium channels in plant cells. FEBS Journal278, 4293–4303.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08371.x

15. 15.

    Guo P, Wei HX, Zhang WJ, Bao YJ 2016 Physiological responses of alfalfa to high-level salt stress: root ion flux and stomatal characteristics. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology18, 125–133.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Hosy E, Vavasseur A, Mouline K 2003 The Arabidopsis outward K+ channel GORK is involved in regulation of stomatal movements and plant transpiration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA100, 5549–5554.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0733970100

17. 17.

    Lu Y, Li N, Sun J 2013 Exogenous hydrogen peroxide, nitric oxide and calcium mediate root ion fluxes in two non-secretor mangrove species subjected to NaCl stress. Tree Physiology33, 81–95.

    Not in our library10.1093/treephys/tps119

18. 18.

    Murphy A, Taiz L 1997 Correlation between potassium efflux and copper sensitivity in ten Arabidopsis ecotypes. New Phytologist136, 211–222.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Percey WJ, Shabala L, Wu Q, Su NN, Breadmore MC, Guijt RM, Bose J, Shabala S 2016 Potassium retention in leaf mesophyll as an element of salinity tissue tolerance in halophytes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry109, 346–354.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.10.011

20. 20.

    Pottosin I, Dobrovinskaya O 2014 Non-selective cation channels in plasma and vacuolar membranes and their contribution to K+ transport. Journal of Plant Physiology171, 732–742.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2013.11.013

21. 21.

    Redwan M, Spinelli F, Marti L, Weiland M, Palm E, Azzarello E, Mancuso S 2016 Potassium fluxes and reactive oxygen species production as potential indicators of salt tolerance in Cucumis sativus. Functional Plant Biology43, 1016–1027.

    Not in our library10.1071/fp16120

22. 22.

    Shabala S 2009 Salinity and programmed cell death: unravelling mechanisms for ion specific signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany60, 709–711.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erp013

23. 23.

    Shabala S 2011 Physiological and cellular aspects of phytotoxicity tolerance in plants: the role of membrane transporters and implications for crop breeding for waterlogging tolerance. New Phytologist190, 289–298.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03575.x

24. 24.

    Shabala S, Bose J, Fuglsang AT, Pottosin I 2016a On a quest for stress tolerance genes: membrane transporters in sensing and adapting to hostile soils. Journal of Experimental Botany67, 1015–1031.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erv465

25. 25.

    Shabala L, Cuin TA, Newman IA, Shabala S 2005 Salinity-induced ion flux patterns from the excised roots of Arabidopsis sos mutants. Planta222, 1041–1050.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-005-0074-2

26. 26.

    Shabala S, Pottosin I 2014 Regulation of potassium transport in plants under hostile conditions: implications for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum151, 257–279.

    Not in our library10.1111/ppl.12165

27. 27.

    Shabala L, Zhang JY, Pottosin I 2016b Cell-type-specific H+-ATPase activity in root tissues enables K+ retention and mediates acclimation of barley (Hordeum vulgare) to salinity stress. Plant Physiology172, 2445–2458.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.16.01347

28. 28.

    Sharma T, Dreyer I, Riedelsberger J 2013 The role of K+ channels in uptake and redistribution of potassium in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science4, 224.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2013.00224

29. 29.

    Smethurst CF, Rix K, Garnett T, Auricht G, Bayart A, Lane P, Wilson SJ, Shabala S 2008 Multiple traits associated with salt tolerance in lucerne: revealing the underlying cellular mechanisms. Functional Plant Biology35, 640–650.

    Not in our library10.1071/fp08030

30. 30.

    Sun J, Dai SX, Wang R 2009 Calcium mediates root K+/Na+ homeostasis in poplar species differing in salt tolerance. Tree Physiology29, 1175–1186.

    Not in our library10.1093/treephys/tpp048

31. 31.

    Sun YL, Kong X, Li C, Liu Y, Ding Z 2015 Potassium retention under salt stress is associated with natural variation in salinity tolerance among Arabidopsis accessions. PLoS One10, e0124032.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0124032

32. 32.

    Véry AA, Nieves-Cordones M, Daly M, Khan I, Fizames C, Sentenac H 2014 Molecular biology of K+ transport across the plant cell membrane: What do we learn from comparison between plant species?Journal of Plant Physiology171, 748–769.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2014.01.011

33. 33.

    Wang F, Chen Z-H, Liu X, Colmer TD, Shabala L, Salih A, Zhou M, Shabala S 2016a Revealing the roles of GORK channels and NADPH oxidase in acclimation to hypoxia in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, doi:10.1093/jxb/erw378.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erw378

34. 34.

    Wang N, Qi HK, Su GL, Yang J, Zhou H, Xu QH, Huang Q, Yan GT 2016b Genotypic variations in ion homeostasis, photochemical efficiency and antioxidant capacity adjustment to salinity in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Soil Science and Plant Nutrition62, 240–246.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Wu HH, Shabala L, Barry K, Zhou M, Shabala S 2013 Ability of leaf mesophyll to retain potassium correlates with salinity tolerance in wheat and barley. Physiologia Plantarum149, 515–527.

    Not in our library10.1111/ppl.12056

36. 36.

    Wu HH, Zhu M, Shabala L, Zhou M, Shabala S 2015 K+ retention in leaf mesophyll, an overlooked component of salinity tolerance mechanism: A case study for barley. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology57, 171–185.

    Not in our library10.1111/jipb.12238

37. 37.

    Wu JL, Seliskar DM 1998 Salinity adaptation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in the salt marsh plant Spartina patens: ATP hydrolysis and enzyme kinetics. Journal of Experimental Botany49, 1005–1013.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 5

• Special issue in honour of Prof. Reto J. Strasser - Photosynthetic activity as assessed via chlorophyll a fluorescence suggests a role of potassium channels in root to shoot signaling · 2020
  Not checked
• Irrigation with commercial bottled water increases generation of reactive oxygen species in Nicotiana tabacum · 2020
  Not checked
• Tissue-Specific Regulation of Na+ and K+ Transporters Explains Genotypic Differences in Salinity Stress Tolerance in Rice · 2019
  Not checked
• Plant Salinity Stress: Many Unanswered Questions Remain · 2019
  No notice
• Regulation of K+ Nutrition in Plants · 2019
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.