No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.
Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake
Andrew K. Borrell, John E. Mullet, Barbara George-Jaeggli and 4 more
Journal of Experimental Botany · 2014
Abstract
Stay-green sorghum plants exhibit greener leaves and stems during the grain-filling period under water-limited conditions compared with their senescent counterparts, resulting in increased grain yield, grain mass, and lodging resistance. Stay-green has been mapped to a number of key chromosomal regions, including Stg1, Stg2, Stg3, and Stg4, but the functions of these individual quantitative trait loci (QTLs) remain unclear. The objective of this study was to show how positive effects of Stg QTLs on grain yield under drought can be explained as emergent consequences of their effects on temporal and spatial water-use patterns that result from changes in leaf-area dynamics. A set of four Stg near-isogenic lines (NILs) and their recurrent parent were grown in a range of field and semicontrolled experiments in southeast Queensland, Australia. These studies showed that the four Stg QTLs regulate canopy size by: (1) reducing tillering via increased size of lower leaves, (2) constraining the size of the upper leaves; and (3) in some cases, decreasing the number of leaves per culm. In addition, they variously affect leaf anatomy and root growth. The multiple pathways by which Stg QTLs modulate canopy development can result in considerable developmental plasticity. The reduction in canopy size associated with Stg QTLs reduced pre-flowering water demand, thereby increasing water availability during grain filling and, ultimately, grain yield. The generic physiological mechanisms underlying the stay-green trait suggest that similar Stg QTLs could enhance post-anthesis drought adaptation in other major cereals such as maize, wheat, and rice.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
The Earth is a water-scarce planet. Feeding more people with less water is a major challenge facing humanity, requiring crops that are highly adapted to dry environments. One such crop, sorghum, evolved in Africa after splitting with rice 50–70 million years ago and is an important global crop grown for food, feed, fibre, and fuel. It is, therefore, a repository of drought adaptation mechanisms. Sorghum is a staple in the semiarid environments of sub-Saharan Africa and central-western India, where people require stable food production. While the global population will increase from about 7 billion to 9 billion by 2050, most of the increase will occur in sub-Saharan Africa, where population growth is among the highest in the world, increasing the risk of food insecurity in this region. Plant traits such as semidwarfism and enhanced responsiveness to N fertilizer increased food production in the so-called Green Revolution in the 1960s and 1970s. Now, a new set of plant traits is needed to further increase crop yield in a Blue Revolution, making plants resilient to the challenges of a water-scarce planet where climate change and global warming threaten food supplies.
Stay-green is an integrated drought-adaptation trait in sorghum. Delayed leaf senescence during grain filling is an emergent consequence of dynamics occurring earlier in crop growth (Fig. 1) and is largely due to an improved balance between the supply and demand of water, as well as the efficiency with which the crop converts water to biomass and grain yield. On the supply side, crop water use during grain filling can be enhanced by increasing water availability at anthesis and/or increasing water accessibility during grain filling. On the demand side, crop water use can be reduced by decreasing leaf area and/or transpiration per unit leaf area. Leaf area can be constrained by reducing tillering, leaf number per culm, and/or individual leaf size. Transpiration per unit leaf area can be limited by stomatal density or aperture, timing of stomatal opening, and hydraulic factors. This paper highlights how stay-green (Stg) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) modify physiological mechanisms affecting both the supply and demand of water to increase drought adaptation.
There are multiple ways for a plant to remain green. A stay-green phenotype may arise if the onset of senescence is delayed (type A), the rate of senescence is reduced (type B), chlorophyll is retained but photosynthesis declines (type C), greenness is retained due to rapid death at harvest (type D), or the phenotype is greener to begin with (type E). These classifications indicate that stay-green may be functional or cosmetic. Functional stay-green is characterized by the maintenance of leaf photosynthesis during grain filling (types A, B, and E), while cosmetic stay-green occurs when photosynthetic capacity is disconnected from leaf greenness (types C and D). Enhanced crop productivity in water-limited environments is dependent on functional stay-green. However, not all functional stay-green is necessarily productive. For example, low sink demand relative to source, created by a small panicle or low grain number, will generate a stay-green phenotype since there is little demand for the crop to translocate carbon and nitrogen from leaves to grain. Therefore, selection for both stay-green and grain yield should be undertaken simultaneously in plant breeding programmes to ensure that delayed senescence is not due to low sink demand.
Delayed leaf senescence can be examined at the cell, leaf. or whole-plant levels. While analysis at each of these levels is helpful in understanding the overall stay-green phenomenon, it has remained a challenge to link molecular processes to whole-plant physiology and, ultimately, to crop production. To some extent, recent reviews have attempted to integrate knowledge on drought adaptation and senescence across scales from molecular to whole-plant. However, the link to whole-plant physiology remains the most tenuous. For example, many recent publications on plant senescence are at the molecular level focusing on Arabidopsis, wheat, and rice. At a general level, phenotyping for drought tolerance in the genomics era is beginning to be addressed, but such linkages need to be explored more specifically in relation to leaf senescence. Identifying the genes underpinning the key stay-green QTLs in cereals is underway, and this knowledge, combined with physiological understanding, should help to bridge the molecular to whole-plant gap.
This paper integrates results from a number of experiments that were conducted to elucidate the physiological mechanisms underpinning the BTx642 (formerly B35) source of stay-green in sorghum. Critical to this research was the development of specific genetic populations (e.g. recombinant inbred lines, RILs; near-isogenic lines, NILs; fine-mapping populations) to enable QTL mapping, physiological dissection, and fine mapping for gene discovery. In particular, the development of NILs containing single introgressions of the Stg1, Stg2, Stg3, and Stg4 QTLs from BTx642 in a RTx7000 background was crucial to understanding the contribution of each QTL alone to drought adaptation in sorghum.
The objective of this paper was to show how the positive effects of Stg QTLs on grain yield under drought can be explained as a consequence of their effects on temporal and spatial water-use patterns that result from changes in leaf-area dynamics.
Construction of RTx7000 NILs containing BTx642 DNA from the stay-green loci
The construction of RTx7000 NILs containing one or more of the Stg loci from BTx642 has been described in detail by. In brief, the BTx642 source of stay-green is derived from IS12555, a durra landrace from Ethiopia. F1 plants of a cross between BTx642 and RTx7000 were backcrossed to RTx7000 either four (BC4, 6000 NIL series) or six (BC6, 2000 NIL series) times and progenies from each backcross were screened for the presence of Stg loci. Selected plants were then selfed to create BC4F2–4 or BC6F2–4 lines. Although most experiments contained many genotypes, only data on four RTx7000 NILs, each containing only either the Stg1 NIL (6078-1), Stg2 NIL (2219-3), Stg3 NIL (2290-19), or Stg4 NIL (6085–9), plus the two parents (RTx7000 and BTx642) are reported here. The size and location of BTx642 DNA introgressions in the RTx7000 NILs, including the four examined in detail in this paper, have been reported by.
Field experiments
Details of most field experiments are given in. In summary, four field experiments were conducted across two locations in Australia’s northeastern grain belt: Biloela (BIL: 24° 24′ S, 150° 30′ E; elevation 175 m) in central Queensland, and Warwick (WAR: 28° 12′ S, 152° 06′ E; elevation 480 m) in southeastern Queensland. Experiment names are constructed by a combination of location (BIL, WAR), year (e.g. 09 for 2009), and how the experiments were conducted (e.g. FLD for field). Field experiments were used to assess the effects of Stg QTLs on phenology, canopy development, crop water use, and grain yield (Table 1).
The first experiment was sown at Biloela on 18 February 2002 (BIL02FLD) on a soil with a dark sandy clay loam A horizon over a brown silty clay B horizon. The experiment included a well-watered (high water, HW) and post-flowering deficit (low water, LW) treatment and was laid out as a split plot with irrigation treatments as main plots, genotypes as subplots, and three replicates. Main plots were 54×19 m, subplots consisted of three rows of 9 m length with 0.9 m row spacing. Data were collected only from the centre row of each plot. Irrigation, fertilizer application, and insect and weed control are outlined in.
Three experiments were conducted at Warwick on a cracking and weakly self-mulching brownish-black clay. The first experiment (WAR04FLD) was sown on 11 December 2003 and emerged 5 days later (Table 1). The second experiment (WAR05FLD) was sown on 7 January 2005 (HW) and 21 January 2005 (LW) and emerged after 8 (HW) and 4 (LW) days. The third experiment (WAR06FLD) was sown on 25 January 2006 for both the HW and LW treatment and emerged 4 days later. The experiments were conducted under nonlimiting nutrient conditions and were planted on full profiles of subsoil moisture. Since the LW treatment depended on rainfall exclusion via rain-out shelters, water treatments could not be randomly allocated within replicates and the HW treatment was a separate block adjacent to the rain-out shelter (LW treatment). Each treatment block was laid out as a split plot with density (HD and LD, 20 and 10 plants m–2 respectively) as main plots, genotypes as subplots, and four replications. Hence, four treatments with increasing levels of water deficit were created, ranging from HWLD (least stressed) to HWHD, LWLD, and LWHD (most stressed). Plots consisted of four rows of 3 m length with 0.5 m row spacing.
Semicontrolled environment experiments
Experiments in semicontrolled environments were conducted at Warwick in ventilated, plastic-covered growth tunnels that excluded rainfall and transmitted approximately 70% of the incident solar radiation. Experiments consisted of individual plants grown in lysimeters (LYS) or small pots (POT). The LYS were made from cylindrical polyvinyl chloride tubes, 300mm diameter and 750mm high. Each was filled with a 3:1:1 mix of alluvial clay soil, loam, and feedlot manure, and 30g Osmocote Plus (16% N, 3.5% P, 10% K plus trace elements; Scotts, Baulkham Hills, Australia) was added to each lysimeter. Experiment WAR06LYS was sown on 25 February 2006 and WAR07LYS on 22 February 2007. Both experiments were laid out as randomized complete block designs with either seven (WAR06LYS) or four replications (WAR07LYS). Plants were well watered and harvested soon after anthesis. Lysimeters are sealed pots that provide detailed data on plant water use, and because their volume is sufficiently large to minimize effects on plant growth, they complement data from field experiments. The impact of various Stg QTLs on parameters linking leaf area and transpiration under low (WAR06LYS, 1.10 kPa) and high (WAR07LYS, 1.54 kPa) vapour pressure deficit conditions were evaluated (Table 1).
Pot experiments were conducted at Warwick during the summers of 2007/2008 (WAR08POT) and 2009/2010 (WAR10POT) (Table 1). The WAR08POT experiment was conducted in 7-l planter bags, filled with pure alluvial clay, which were placed on capillary mats to prevent water stress. Plants were well watered and fertilized until harvest when 11 leaves had fully expanded. A similar process was followed for WAR10POT, except that larger 19-l pots were used and plants were harvested at anthesis. Both experiments were well fertilized and were laid out as a randomized block design with either four (WAR08POT) or 20 (WAR10POT) replications. Conditions in the growth tunnel provided an environment for phenotyping of mapping populations in POT experiments with less error variance than FLD experiments.
Phenology and leaf-area development
Emergence was defined as the date when 50% of the plants in each experiment had emerged from the soil and anthesis when, on average, 50% of the anthers had extruded from the main shoot panicle of four tagged plants per plot in FLD studies or from each plant in LYS and POT studies. Physiological maturity was defined as the date when basal grains in 90% of the same tagged plants in FLD studies attained a black layer.
In field experiments, total and fertile tiller number per plant were recorded on all plants in one of the central rows of each plot, excluding plants near the end of the rows. The area of all fully expanded leaves on all axes was measured with a planimeter (Delta-T DIAS image analysis system, Cambridge, UK) on two tagged plants per plot at three harvest times, corresponding with the expansion of the 6th, 12th, and flag leaves. In the LYS and POT experiments, tiller number and the area of all fully expanded leaves on all axes were measured for each plant (Table 1). Additional details on measurements are given in.
Biomass and grain yield sampling
Biomass samples were taken at anthesis and maturity in the three field experiments at Warwick by cutting plants at ground level and dividing them into green and senesced leaves, stems (including leaf sheaths), and panicles (if present) for main shoots and all tillers combined. Green leaf area of the whole sample was obtained with a planimeter. Samples were dried at 80 °C for at least 2 days before obtaining dry mass. After threshing of dried panicles, grain yield and 100 grain mass were measured and grain number was derived.
Crop water use
In WAR05FLD, soil water content was measured by neutron moderation (model 503 DR Hydroprobe, CPN International, CA, USA). One access tube per plot was sited at the mid inter-row position. Readings were taken weekly at 20-cm depth intervals to a depth of 1.8 m throughout crop growth and were converted to soil water content using a calibration equation. Soil water content in the 0–20cm layer was determined gravimetrically by taking a core within a radius of 1 m from the access tube. For each measurement date, total soil water content was taken as the sum of individual depth intervals and temporal patterns of cumulative soil water content were developed for each plot.
In WAR06LYS and WAR07LYS, the sealed LYS were weighed weekly and any change in weight was recorded as the amount of transpiration by the plant. LYS were then rewatered to their starting weight and plant water use was calculated as the sum of the amount of water added. Water loss from blank sealed pots (no plant) was measured weekly and found to be negligible. Plants were harvested soon after anthesis.
Stomatal index
Stomatal density depends on the epidermal cell size, the leaf position, and environmental factors that affect epidermal cell expansion. As a consequence, stomatal density can be highly variable, even over the surface of a single leaf. To standardize for the effects of epidermal cell expansion, stomatal index (SI) was defined by as the number of stomata per unit leaf area, expressed as a percentage of the combined number of stomata, epidermal cells, and hair bases per unit leaf area. The SI is thus a measure of the rate of stomatal initiation that accounts for variability due to epidermal cell size.
Measurements of SI were taken on four replicate plants of RTx7000 and the four Stg NILs from the HD and LD treatments in the irrigated control of WAR05FLD. Samples were taken from the abaxial surface of four leaf positions within each plant: leaf 7 (L7), L10, L13, and L16, which were sampled at 24, 32, 42, and 54 days after emergence, respectively. One 0.5-cm2 section, located midway between the midrib and leaf margin in the widest part of the leaf where veins were running parallel to each other, was removed from each leaf using a scalpel blade. Leaf sections were cuticularized by boiling in a 6:1 solution of 30% hydrogen peroxide and 100% acetic acid, as reported by for Eucalyptus leaves. Once the cellular and vascular material was digested, the remaining abaxial cuticle with adhering epidermal layer was washed in distilled water and mounted unstained in glycerine jelly onto glass microscope slides. Slides were examined using a differential phase contrast light microscope (Olympus BX51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a digital camera mounted to the eyepiece and connected to a colour monitor. Statistical analysis of data was carried out in GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, OK, USA).
Transpiration per unit leaf area
In WAR05FLD, where cumulative crop water use was determined by the neutron moderation method, transpiration per unit leaf area at anthesis was calculated by dividing cumulative crop water use (mm) by total green leaf area (m2 m–2). It was assumed that transpiration was essentially equal to crop water use, since the remaining water balance components (evaporation from the dry soil surface prior to anthesis, run-off, seepage, and drainage) were considered to be negligible, particularly under the terminal drought conditions in the rain-out shelter.
Statistical analyses
For the analyses across experiments, each of the four water × density treatments in WAR05FLD was considered an individual experiment. In all experiments, a linear mixed model was fitted for each trait using the ASReml program with the R software package. The fitted model contained fixed effects for experiment, genotype, and genotype × experiment interaction, and random effects for replicates and residuals for each experiment. Predicted values for genotype × experiment were calculated using the R function predict.asreml. Significance levels of the fixed effects were determined using a chi-squared Wald test.
Stg loci increase grain yield under water-limiting conditions with minimal yield cost in water-sufficient environments
The stay-green trait is positively correlated with sorghum grain yield in field conditions under terminal drought. Establishing this correlation is important because sorghum breeders were initially concerned that leaves may remain green simply because of a small sink demand, indicating that stay-green may be correlated with low grain yield. One of the most convincing earlier pieces of evidence came from a trial at ICRISAT, India, where a strong positive relationship between green leaf dry mass at 25 days after anthesis and grain yield in a set of 160 RILs (BQL39 (senescent) × BQL41 (stay-green)) was demonstrated for field-grown sorghum in the post-rainy season (Fig. 2A; ).
Although a positive correlation between stay-green and yield has been demonstrated in these earlier studies, the physiological and molecular basis of the stay-green trait still remains unclear. Gaining such insights requires the use of NILs (Table 1). Individual Stg NILs consistently yielded more grain than RTx7000 under drought stress in WAR04FLD and WAR05FLD. This difference was significant (P<0.05) in all but three of the 14 treatment × Stg QTL combinations. For example under severe terminal drought stress in a rain-out shelter at WAR04FLD, Stg1, Stg2, and Stg3 (Stg4 was not evaluated) yielded significantly (P<0.01) more grain than RTx7000 (Fig. 2B), with the yield benefit ranging from 24% (Stg3) to 31% and 32% (Stg1 and Stg2, respectively). Similarly in WAR05FLD, the yield benefit ranged from 12–17% for Stg2, Stg3, and Stg4 to 36% for Stg1.
Genotypic differences in individual grain mass under drought stress (WAR04FLD and WAR05FLD) were relatively small, suggesting that differences in grain number already reflected differences in assimilate availability, resulting in a significant correlation between grain number and yield (Fig. 3C). Individual Stg NILs exhibited higher (P<0.05) grain numbers than RTx7000 in four of the 14 treatment × Stg QTL combinations, with a trend for higher grain numbers in another eight of the combinations. In no combinations was grain number significantly less in the Stg NILs compared with RTx7000. In WAR04FLD, grain number per panicle was positively correlated with grain number m–2 under HD (R 2=0.91, n=4, P<0.01) and LD (R 2=0.76, n=4, P<0.05), suggesting that differences in grain number were primarily due to grain number per panicle rather than panicle number m–2. Furthermore, Stg NILs exhibited higher (P<0.05) individual grain masses than RTx7000 in three of the 14 treatment × Stg QTL combinations under drought, with a trend for higher grain masses in another seven of the combinations. In no combinations was individual grain mass significantly less in the Stg NILs compared with RTx7000.
The contribution of Stg loci to higher grain yield appears to be due to the extension of the photosynthetically active phase of the leaf and also possibly to higher photosynthetic rates. While the extension of green leaf area during grain filling is the key mechanism, the Stg1 and Stg4 NILs also exhibit higher specific leaf nitrogen at anthesis compared with RTx7000, suggesting that the photosynthetic rate may also be higher in these lines.
While the yield advantage of the NILs in these experiments is encouraging, it demonstrates the positive effect of the Stg introgressions on grain yield in only a single genetic background across four managed environments. To evaluate the value of stay-green across multiple genetic backgrounds and environments, used data from the Queensland Government’s sorghum breeding programme to analyse the relationship between stay-green and yield from breeding trials that sampled 1668 unique hybrid combinations and 23 environments that ranged in mean yields from 2.3 to 10.5 t ha–1. While the majority of associations were positive in environments with yields below 6 t ha–1 (Fig. 2C), there was a trend towards a greater proportion of negative associations if trial mean yield increased above 8 t ha–1. However, the effectiveness of Stg QTLs depended on the genetic background, as the slope of the linear regression at a given grain yield differed consistently across male parents. Similar context dependencies have been shown in other studies that assessed multiple, rather than individual, Stg QTLs.
There was no consistent yield cost associated with the Stg QTLs in the irrigated control of WAR05FLD, supporting earlier studies showing that little or no yield penalty is associated with the BTx642 source of stay-green under high-yielding conditions. Although biomass accumulation is radiation limited under well-watered conditions, the reduced leaf area index of Stg QTLs was still high enough to have minimal impact on intercepted radiation.
Sorghum yields in Australia’s northern grain belt are currently about 2.5 t ha–1, and significantly less in central-western India and sub-Saharan Africa. Since grain yield of sorghum is likely to be affected by post-anthesis drought stress in rain-fed farming systems of northeastern Australia, India’s western-central monsoon region, the southern USA, and sub-Saharan Africa, selection for stay-green in elite sorghum hybrids should have the potential to increase yield, profitability, and sustainability for farmers in rain-fed environments worldwide, without major costs during wetter years.
Increased grain yield of Stg loci linked to their reduced canopy size at flowering
Reduced canopy size has been linked to increased grain yield under post-anthesis drought stress. Introgression of Stg QTLs into cereals will only benefit grain growers if changes in leaf-area dynamics associated with these QTLs do increase grain yield in environments characterized by post-anthesis drought (Fig. 1). At both WAR04FLD and WAR05FLD, Stg NILs consistently had lower green leaf area at anthesis (GLAA) under post-anthesis drought stress than RTx7000 (Fig 3A). In both experiments, biomass accumulation during the grain filling period (bioGFP) was significantly negatively correlated with GLAA (R 2=0.94, n=4, P<0.05 for WAR04FLD; R 2=0.83, n=5, P<0.05 for WAR05FLD; Fig. 3A). Under drought stress, when biomass production is a function of water availability, this negative relationship likely represents increased water availability during grain filling for the Stg NILs compared with RTx7000. In that case, genotypic differences in bioGFP likely reflect differences in the crop (panicle) growth rates around anthesis, which in turn determine grain number. Consistent with this, a positive correlation between bioGFP and grain number existed (Fig. 3B). Genotypic differences in grain number, in turn, explained most of the differences in grain yield (Fig. 3C). The increased grain yield of Stg QTLs under post-anthesis drought stress could thus be largely explained as an emergent consequence of pre-anthesis QTL effects on leaf-area dynamics.
Stg loci decrease canopy size via reduced tillering and smaller upper leaves
In general, introgressing the various stay-green QTLs into RTx7000 decreased the size of the canopy at anthesis by reducing (P<0.001) the number of culms m–2 under well-watered and water-limited conditions. Fig. 4A and B shows results for BIL02FLD, but similar results were obtained in other experiments. The overall ranking of tillering in BIL02FLD was Stg1 < BTx642 < Stg4 < Stg2 < Stg3 < RTx7000. In another field experiment under a rain-out shelter (WAR06FLD), introgressing the Stg1 region alone into RTx7000 significantly (P<0.05) reduced culms m–2 compared with RTx7000 under both well-watered and water-limited conditions (Fig. 4C). Fig. 4D shows the low-tillering phenotype exhibited by the Stg1 NIL relative to RTx7000 (Fig. 4E) in a pot experiment (WAR10POT). Low tillering of Stg isolines was significantly negatively correlated (R 2=0.97, n=5, P<0.01) with the larger size of leaves 2–9 relative to RTx7000 when evaluated across multiple experiments, suggesting that it was a consequence of the competition for limited carbon resources with larger developing leaves. Such a causal mechanism indicates that reduced tillering due to the Stg loci is a constitutive trait.
Individual Stg QTLs can also constrain GLAA by limiting the cumulative size of the upper leaves (Fig. 1; L10+), as a strong positive correlation (R 2=0.81 n=5, P<0.05) between the two traits has been reported. Evidence from six environments showed that Stg4 constrained the cumulative size of L10+ the most and Stg1 the least. In WAR06FLD, where two levels of water deficit were generated by two levels of crop density, the leaf size distribution pattern of Stg1 was similar to that of RTx7000 in the milder water deficit (LD), yet leaves were significantly (P<0.05) smaller in Stg1 (up to 18% smaller) under the more severe water deficit generated by the HD treatment, indicating an adaptive response by Stg1 plants to increasing water deficit (Fig. 5). Combined with the fact that upper leaves (L10+) elongate after tiller appearance has ceased, this suggests that the effects of Stg QTLs on GLAA via reduced size of L10+ operated through different mechanisms than the effects on GLAA via increased size of L2–9.
In summary, canopy development was largely regulated by two mechanisms in plants containing the Stg QTLs (Fig. 1): (1) reduced tillering in response to larger lower leaves (L2–9); and (2) smaller size of upper leaves (L10+). This implies major developmental changes around L9 and L10. The first mechanism is likely to be most advantageous in low-density environments where tillering potential is high, whereas the second mechanism will likely dominate in high-density environments where tillering potential is low. Combined, these two mechanisms provide crop plants with considerable plasticity to modify canopy development in response to the severity of water limitation.
Decrease in canopy size shifts crop water use from pre- to post-flowering
The extent of the effect of Stg QTLs on canopy development and grain yield varies with environmental and management conditions experienced by the crop prior to flowering (Fig. 3). This was illustrated by the experiment effect on the association between GLAA and bioGFP (Fig. 3A). One key physiological mechanism by which stay-green confers drought adaptation under terminal water deficit is to conserve soil water before anthesis for utilization during grain filling. Small increases in water use during grain filling can significantly impact grain yield, and simulation studies have found that 1mm of additional water transpired during grain filling could increase grain yield by about 30kg ha–1 in sorghum and by more than 55kg ha−1 in wheat. These yield increases are supported by field experiments for wheat and are mainly due to the fact that water extracted late in the season is not required to build more structural crop biomass and is utilized predominantly for grain growth. A critical aspect of any benefit from Stg QTLs on grain yield under drought is therefore the interaction of reduced canopy size and reduced crop water use at anthesis with environmental conditions, which determines water availability during grain filling (Fig. 1).
A positive correlation between canopy size and water use at anthesis was observed under low vapour pressure deficit in WAR06LYS (R 2=0.92, n=5, P<0.01; Fig. 6), where canopy size at anthesis was significantly (P<0.05) less in all Stg NILs compared with RTx7000 and plant water use was significantly (P<0.05) less in Stg2, Stg3, and Stg4. Similar trends were observed under high vapour pressure deficit in WAR07LYS, although differences were not significant (Fig. 6). Importantly, these results were reproduced under field conditions in the rain-out shelter (LWHD treatment) at WAR05FLD, where crop water use in Stg1, Stg3, and Stg4 was significantly (P<0.05) less than RTx7000 prior to anthesis, but significantly (P<0.05) more in Stg1, Stg2, and Stg3 post-anthesis. For example, Stg3 saved 37mm before anthesis compared to RTx7000 (135 versus 172mm; Fig. 7), which accounted for most of the additional 47mm used after anthesis (192 versus 145mm). Similar results were obtained for Stg1, which used significantly (P<0.05) less water than RTx7000 before anthesis (139 versus 172mm), but used significantly (P<0.05) more water after anthesis (197 versus 145mm). Crop water use during grain filling was positively correlated with grain yield in WAR05FLD across the LWHD and LWLD treatments (R 2=0.74, n=4, P<0.05), with the Stg1 NIL using more (P<0.05) water and producing more (P<0.05) grain than RTx7000 under both densities. The slope of the relationship (5g m–2 mm–1 = 50kg ha–1 mm–1) was comparable to the 30kg ha–1 mm–1 reported by for sorghum and the 55kg ha−1 mm–1 reported by for wheat (both simulation studies). Therefore, the increased grain yield of Stg QTLs compared to RTx7000 under post-anthesis drought stress could at least partly be explained as a consequence of increased post-anthesis water use in response to reduced canopy size.
Stg loci modify transpiration per unit leaf area via stomatal index
Although the Stg loci reduced water use before flowering mainly by reducing transpirational leaf area, there is some evidence that the Stg loci also modified transpiration per unit leaf area (Fig. 8). In WAR05FLD, the abaxial SI under HWLD of Leaf 10 was significantly positively correlated (R 2=0.64, n=5, P<0.10) with average transpiration per unit leaf area during the pre-anthesis period measured in the adjoining LWLD treatment (Fig. 8). This suggests that the number of stomata could be a key determinant of transpiration per unit leaf area, which is a canopy-level measure of conductance. The data also indicates that particular Stg loci can either increase or decrease the SI and transpiration per unit leaf area, relative to RTx7000. The relatively low transpiration rate of Stg4 in Fig. 8 was a consequence of its relatively high abaxial SI being offset by its small leaf size (Fig. 4), resulting in a relatively low transpiration per unit leaf area. Hence, Stg loci have an impact on the demand for water by regulating transpiration via at least two mechanisms: leaf area and transpiration per unit leaf area. This provides the crop with multiple pathways to conserve water.
Stg loci modify root architecture and spatial water extraction patterns
The increased post-anthesis water use of Stg QTLs compared to RTx7000 was not solely a consequence of changes in temporal water-use patterns, as it more than compensated for the reduced pre-anthesis water use, resulting in increased total water use (Fig. 7). In the LWHD treatment of WAR05FLD, the Stg1 QTL used 19mm more water than RTx7000 and the Stg3 QTL 10mm more water (Fig. 7). As water uptake under drought stress is supply limited, these results indicate that the Stg QTLs could access more water than RTx7000. Increased access to water can be achieved by either better water extraction from the soil that is explored by the roots or increasing the soil volume explored by the roots through deeper rooting or greater lateral spread (Fig. 1; ). There is some evidence that Stg QTLs could modify root architecture in sorghum. A Stg4 fine-mapping population varied in biomass partitioning between root and shoot when harvested at the 5-leaf stage in WAR08POT (Fig. 9A). While genotypic differences were not significant (P>0.05), there was a trend for greater allocation to roots in the Stg4 NIL (0.19) compared with RTx7000 (0.12).
In another study, mapped QTLs for nodal root angle in sorghum at the 6-leaf stage and evaluated the relevance of the trait for improving drought adaptation via marker-assisted selection. They assessed a subset of 141 F6 RILs that were developed by single seed descent from a cross between inbred lines B923296 (Fig. 9B, narrow angle relative to a vertical plane) and SC170-6–8 (wide angle). B923296 is a highly stay-green line containing the BTx642 source of stay-green. All four nodal root angle QTLs in sorghum identified by colocated with previously identified QTLs for stay-green (Fig. 9C; adapted from ). In fact, the peak LOD location of all four QTLs occurred within a stay-green QTL region. Importantly, qRA1_5 colocated with the Stg4 QTL, with the peak location of qRA1_5 occurring within four previously identified QTLs for stay-green. Therefore the trend for increased root HI exhibited by the Stg4 NIL in WAR08POT is likely to contribute to the stay-green phenotype in this NIL.
Genotypic differences in nodal root angle can affect spatial water-use patterns of mature plants. observed a trend that a genotype with a narrow root angle (vertical root system) had relatively more root length directly below the plant than a genotype with wide root angle (horizontal root system), which produced more lateral roots, resulting in more lateral water uptake. Although differences in relative water extraction were not significant, these preliminary results do support the hypothesis that a narrow root angle may increase water accessibility in deep soils under higher plant density, whereas a wide root angle may increase water accessibility under lower density (e.g. skip row) management systems. These results support the inclusion of root angle as a selection criterion in sorghum breeding programmes.
Conclusions
Stay-green is an important drought-adaptation trait in cereals. Stg loci reduce canopy size at flowering by modifying tillering, leaf number, and leaf size. Smaller canopy size at flowering reduces pre-anthesis water use, which under post-flowering water stress increases water availability during grain filling and thus grain yield. There is also some evidence that Stg loci have an impact on root architecture, which is likely linked to the increased water accessibility during grain filling under field conditions. Stg loci can also modify leaf anatomy, affecting parameters such as abaxial SI. The stay-green phenotype is thus the emergent consequence of the interaction between Stg loci that regulate largely constitutive traits related to plant size, and hence water demand by the crop, and the environment that regulates water supply by the soil. It is anticipated that the genes that underpin Stg QTLs could be modulated in other major cereal species (wheat, maize, and rice) to enhance their drought adaptation in localities worldwide where water is limiting after flowering.
References 75
- 1.
Abdulai AL Parzies H Kouressy M Vaksmann M Asch F Brueck H 2012 Yield stability of photoperiod sensitive sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) accessions under diverse climatic environments. International Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 17–32.
Not in our library
- 2.
Alam MM Hammer GL van Oosterom EJ Cruickshank AW Hunt CH Jordan DR 2014 A physiological framework to explain genetic and environmental regulation of tillering in sorghum. New Phytologist 10.1111/nph.12767
Not in our library10.1111/nph.12767
- 3.
Bandaru V Stewart BA Baumhardt RL Ambati S Robinson CA Schlegel A 2006 Growing dryland grain sorghum in clumps to reduce vegetative growth and increase yield. Agronomy Journal 98, 1109–1120.
Not in our library
- 4.
Bhosale SU Stich B Rattunde F 2012 Association analysis of photoperiodic flowering time genes in West and Central African sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. BMC Plant Biology 12, 32.
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2229-12-32
- 5.
Boffa JM Taonda SJB Dickey JB 2000 Field-scale influence of karite (Vitellaria paradoxa) on sorghum production in the Sudan zone of Burkina Faso. Agroforestry Systems 49, 153–175.
Not in our library
- 6.
Borrell A Hammer G Van Oosterom E 2001 Stay-green: a consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? Annals of Applied Biology 138, 91–95.
Not in our library
- 7.
Borrell AK Bidinger FR Sunitha K 1999 Stay-green associated with yield in recombinant inbred sorghum lines varying in rate of leaf senescence. International Sorghum and Millets Newsletter 40, 31–34.
Not in our library
- 8.
Borrell AK Hammer GL Douglas ACL 2000a Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? I. Leaf growth and senescence. Crop Science 40, 1026–1037.
Not in our library
- 9.
Borrell AK Hammer GL Henzell RG 2000b Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? II. Dry matter production and yield. Crop Science 40, 1037–1048.
Not in our library
- 10.
Borrell AK Jordan DR George-Jaeggli B Hammer GL Van Oosterom E Klein P Mullet J 2009 Fine-mapping candidate genes for ‘stay-green’ in sorghum: are we there yet? 3rd International Conference on Integrated Approaches to Improve Crop Production under Drought-Prone Environments (InterDrought-III). Shanghai, China: Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Science. L 5.03.
Not in our library
- 11.
Borrell AK van Oosterom EJ Mullet JE George-Jaeggli B Jordan DR Klein PE Hammer GL 2014 Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns. New Phytologist 10.1111/nph.12869
Not in our library10.1111/nph.12869
- 12.
Butler DG Cullis BR Gilmour AR Gogel BJ 2009 ASReml-R reference manual release 3. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries.
Not in our library
- 13.
Carr DJ Carr SGM 1991 Development of the stomatal complexes during ontogeny in Eucalyptus and Angophora (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 19, 173–190.
Not in our library
- 14.
Chapman SC Cooper M Hammer GL 2002 Using crop simulation to generate genotype by environment interaction effects for sorghum in water-limited environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 379–389.
Not in our library
- 15.
Crasta OR Xu WW Rosenow DT Mullet J Nguyen HT 1999 Mapping of post-flowering drought resistance traits in grain sorghum: association between QTLs influencing premature senescence and maturity. Molecular and General Genetics 262, 579–588.
Not in our library10.1007/s004380051120
- 16.
DeLacy IH Kaul S Rana BS Cooper M 2010 Genotypic variation for grain and stover yield of dryland (rabi) sorghum in India 2. A characterisation of genotype × environment interactions. Field Crops Research 118, 236–242.
Not in our library
- 17.
Dingkuhn M Singh BB Clerget B Chantereau J Sultan B 2006 Past, present and future criteria to breed crops for water-limited environments in West Africa. Agricultural Water Management 80, 241–261.
Not in our library
- 18.
Duncan RR Bockholt AJ Miller FR 1981 Descriptive comparison of senescent and nonsenescent Sorghum genotypes. Agronomy Journal 73, 849–853.
Not in our library
- 19.
Eastin JD Hultquist JH Sullivan CY 1973 Physiologic maturity in grain sorghum. Crop Science 13, 175–178.
Not in our library
- 20.
Feltus FA Hart GE Schertz KF Casa AM Kresovich S Abraham S Klein PE Brown PJ Paterson AH 2006 Alignment of genetic maps and QTLs between inter- and intraspecific sorghum populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112, 1295–1305.
Not in our library10.1007/s00122-006-0232-3
- 21.
Foley JA Ramankutty N Braumann KA Cassidy E Gerber JS Johnston M Mueller ND O’Connell C Deepak KR Zaks DPM 2011 Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342.
Not in our library10.1038/nature10452
- 22.
Gregersen PL Culetic A Boschian L Krupinska K 2013 Plant senescence and crop productivity. Plant Molecular Biology 82, 603–622.
Not in our library10.1007/s11103-013-0013-8
- 23.
Hammer GL 2006 Pathways to prosperity: breaking the yield barrier in sorghum. Agricultural Science 19, 16–22.
Not in our library
- 24.
Harris K Subudhi PK Borrell A Jordan D Rosenow D Nguyen H Klein P Klein R Mullet J 2007 Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 327–338.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erl225
- 25.
Haub C 2013 2013 World population data sheet. http://www.prb.org/pdf13/2013-population-data-sheet_eng.pdf (accessed May 2014).
Not in our library
- 26.
Haussmann BIG Mahalakshmi V Reddy BVS Seetharama N Hash CT Geiger HH 2002 QTL mapping of stay-green in two sorghum recombinant inbred populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106, 133–142.
Not in our library10.1007/s00122-002-1012-3
- 27.
Henzell RG Gillieron W 1973 Effects of partial and complete panicle removal on the rate of death of some Sorghum bicolor genotypes under moisture stress. Queensland Journal of Agriculture and Animal Science 30, 291–299.
Not in our library
- 28.
Jan A Maruyama K Todaka D Kidokoro S Abo M Yoshimura E 2013 OsTZF1, a CCCH-tandem zinc finger protein, confers delayed senescence and stress tolerance in rice by regulating stress-regulated genes. Plant Physiology 161, 1202–12016.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.205385
- 29.
Jing H-C Nam HG 2012 Leaf senescence in plants: from model plants to crops, still so many unknowns. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 54, 514–515.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01148.x
- 30.
Jordan DR Hunt CH Cruickshank AW Borrell AK Henzell RG 2012 The relationship between the stay-green trait and grain yield in elite sorghum hybrids grown in a range of environments. Crop Science 52, 1153–1161.
Not in our library
- 31.
Jordan DR Tao Y Godwin ID Henzell RG Cooper M McIntyre CL 2003 Prediction of hybrid performance in grain sorghum using RFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106, 559–567.
Not in our library10.1007/s00122-002-1144-5
- 32.
Kassahun B Bidinger F Hash C Kuruvinashetti M 2010 Stay-green expression in early generation sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] QTL introgression lines. Euphytica 172, 351–362.
Not in our library
- 33.
Kebede H Subudhi PK Rosenow DT Nguyen HT 2001 Quantitative trait loci influencing drought tolerance in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103, 266–276.
Not in our library
- 34.
Khush G 2001 Green revolution: the way forward. Nature Genetics 2, 815–822.
Not in our library10.1038/35093585
- 35.
Kim HK Luquet D van Oosterom E Dingkuhn M Hammer G 2010 Regulation of tillering in sorghum: genotypic effects. Annals of Botany 106, 69–78.
Not in our library10.1093/aob/mcq080
- 36.
Kim Y-S Sakuraba Y Han S-H Yoo S-C Paek N-C 2013 Mutation of the Arabidopsis NAC016 transcription factor delays leaf senescence. Plant and Cell Physiology 54, 1660–1672.
Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pct113
- 37.
Kirkegaard JA Lilley JM Howe GN Graham JM 2007 Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 303–315.
Not in our library
- 38.
Kouressy M Dingkuhn M Vaksmann M Heinemann AB 2008 Adaptation to diverse semi-arid environments of sorghum genotypes having different plant type and sensitivity to photoperiod. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148, 357–371.
Not in our library
- 39.
Lafarge TA Hammer GL 2002 Tillering in grain sorghum over a wide range of population densities: modelling dynamics of tiller fertility. Annals of Botany 90, 99–110.
Not in our library10.1093/aob/mcf153
- 40.
Li Z Peng J Wen X Guo H 2012 Gene network analysis and functional studies of senescence-associated genes reveal novel regulators of Arabidopsis leaf senescence. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 54, 526–539.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01136.x
- 41.
Mace E Singh V van Oosterom E Hammer G Hunt C Jordan D 2012 QTL for nodal root angle in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) co-locate with QTL for traits associated with drought adaptation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124, 97–109.
Not in our library10.1007/s00122-011-1690-9
- 42.
Manschadi AM Christopher J Devoil P Hammer GL 2006 The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. Functional Plant Biology 33, 823–837.
Not in our library10.1071/fp06055
- 43.
McKeown FR 1978 A land classification of the Hermitage Research Station: division of land utilisation. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Department of Primary Industries.
Not in our library
- 44.
- 45.
Northcote KH 1979 A factual key for the recognition of Australian soils. Adelaide, Australia: Rellim Technical Publications.
Not in our library
- 46.
Paterson AH Bowers JE Bruggmann R 2009a The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457, 551–556.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07723
- 47.
Paterson AH Bowers JE Feltus FA Tang HB Lin LF Wang XY 2009b Comparative genomics of grasses promises a bountiful harvest. Plant Physiology 149, 125–131.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.108.129262
- 48.
Pennisi E 2008 The blue revolution, drop by drop, gene by gene. Science 320, 171–173.
Not in our library10.1126/science.320.5873.171
- 49.
R Development Core Team. 2012 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Not in our library
- 50.
Richards RA Rebetzke GJ Watt M Condon AG Spielmeyer W Dolferus R 2010 Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. Functional Plant Biology 37, 85–97.
Not in our library
- 51.
Rosenow DT Quisenberry JE Wendt CW Clark LE 1983 Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm. Agricultural Water Management 7, 207–222.
Not in our library
- 52.
Royer DL 2001 Stomatal density and stomatal index as indicators of paleoatmospheric CO2 concentration. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 114, 1–28.
Not in our library10.1016/s0034-6667(00)00074-9
- 53.
Salisbury EJ 1927 On the causes and ecological significance of stomatal frequency, with special reference to the woodland flora. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 216, 1–65.
Not in our library
- 54.
Singh V van Oosterom EJ Jordan DR Hammer GL 2012 Genetic control of nodal root angle in sorghum and its implications on water extraction. European Journal of Agronomy 42, 3–10.
Not in our library
- 55.
Srinivas G Satish K Madhusudhana R Nagaraja Reddy R Murali Mohan S Seetharama N 2009 Identification of quantitative trait loci for agronomically important traits and their association with genic-microsatellite markers in sorghum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118, 1439–1454.
Not in our library10.1007/s00122-009-0993-6
- 56.
Subudhi PK Rosenow DT Nguyen HT 2000 Quantitative trait loci for the stay green trait in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench): consistency across genetic backgrounds and environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101, 733–741.
Not in our library
- 57.
Tangpremsri T 1989 Physiological studies on the performance of sorghum genotypes under moisture limiting conditions, Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
Not in our library
- 58.
Tao YZ Henzell RG Jordan DR Butler DG Kelly AM McIntyre CL 2000 Identification of genomic regions associated with stay green in sorghum by testing RILs in multiple environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100, 1225–1232.
Not in our library
- 59.
Thomas H Howarth CJ 2000 Five ways to stay green. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 329–337.
Not in our library10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.329
- 60.
Tian F Gong J Zhang J Zhang M Wang G Li A Wang W 2013 Enhanced stability of thylakoid membrane proteins and antioxidant competence contribute to drought stress resistance in the tasg1 wheat stay-green mutant. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 1509–1520.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ert004
- 61.
Tichá I 1982 Photosynthetic characteristics during ontogenesis of leaves. 7. Stomata density and sizes. Photosynthetica 16, 375–471.
Not in our library
- 62.
- 63.
Tuinstra MR Ejeta G Goldsbrough P 1998 Evaluation of near-isogenic sorghum lines contrasting for QTL markers associated with drought tolerance. Crop Science 38, 835–842.
Not in our library
- 64.
Tuinstra MR Grote EM Goldsbrough PB Ejeta G 1996 Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with pre-flowering drought tolerance in sorghum. Crop Science 36, 1337–1344.
Not in our library
- 65.
Tuinstra MR Grote EM Goldsbrough PB Ejeta G 1997 Genetic analysis of post-flowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Molecular Breeding 3, 439–448.
Not in our library
- 66.
United Nations Development Programme. 2012 Africa Human Development Report 2012: towards a food secure future. New York: UNDP.
Not in our library
- 67.
Vadez V Deshpande SP Kholova J Hammer GL Borrell AK Talwar HS Hash CT 2011 Stay-green quantitative trait loci’s effects on water extraction, transpiration efficiency and seed yield depend on recipient parent background. Functional Plant Biology 38, 553–566.
Not in our library10.1071/fp11073
- 68.
van Oosterom EJ Borrell AK Deifel KS Hammer GL 2011 Does increased leaf appearance rate enhance adaptation to postanthesis drought stress in sorghum? Crop Science 51, 2728–2740.
Not in our library
- 69.
van Oosterom EJ Hammer GL 2008 Determination of grain number in sorghum. Field Crops Research 108, 259–268.
Not in our library
- 70.
Vidal J 2013 Climate change: how a warming world is a threat to our food supplies. The Observer 13 April 2013.
Not in our library
- 71.
Wolfe KH Gouy M Yang Y-W Sharp PM Li W-H 1989 Date of the monocot–dicot divergence estimated from chloroplast DNA sequence data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 86, 6201–6205.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.86.16.6201
- 72.
Woodward FI 1993 Plant responses to past concentrations of CO2. Vegetatio 104–105, 145–155.
Not in our library
- 73.
Wu X-Y Kuai B-K Jia J-Z Jing H-C 2012 Regulation of leaf senescence and crop genetic improvement. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 54, 936–952.
Not in our library10.1111/jipb.12005
- 74.
Xu WW Subudhi PK Crasta OR Rosenow DT Mullet JE Nguyen HT 2000 Molecular mapping of QTLs conferring stay-green in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Genome 43, 461–469.
Not in our library
- 75.
Yang Z Hammer G van Oosterom E Rochas D Deifel K 2010 Effects of pot size on growth of mazie and sorghum plants. In: George-Jaeggli B Jordan DJ, eds. 1st Australian Summer Grains Conference. Gold Coast, Australia: Grains Research and Development Corporation.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 6
- Breeding custom‐designed crops for improved drought adaptation · 2021Not checked
- The Impacts of Flowering Time and Tillering on Grain Yield of Sorghum Hybrids across Diverse Environments · 2020Not checked
- Prioritizing quantitative trait loci for root system architecture in tetraploid wheat · 2016No notice
- Stay-green traits to improve wheat adaptation in well-watered and water-limited environments · 2016No notice
- Application of genomics-assisted breeding for generation of climate resilient crops: progress and prospects · 2015No notice
- High-throughput phenotyping of seminal root traits in wheat · 2015No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.