Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Molecular and genetic bases of heat stress responses in crop plants and breeding for increased resilience and productivity

Michela Janni, Mariolina Gullì, Elena Maestri and 4 more

Journal of Experimental Botany · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa034

Abstract

To ensure the food security of future generations and to address the challenge of the ‘no hunger zone’ proposed by the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), crop production must be doubled by 2050, but environmental stresses are counteracting this goal. Heat stress in particular is affecting agricultural crops more frequently and more severely. Since the discovery of the physiological, molecular, and genetic bases of heat stress responses, cultivated plants have become the subject of intense research on how they may avoid or tolerate heat stress by either using natural genetic variation or creating new variation with DNA technologies, mutational breeding, or genome editing. This review reports current understanding of the genetic and molecular bases of heat stress in crops together with recent approaches to creating heat-tolerant varieties. Research is close to a breakthrough of global relevance, breeding plants fitter to face the biggest challenge of our time.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Current analysis conducted by scientific communities including NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) indicates that the average global temperature on Earth has increased by ~0.8 °C since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15–0.20 °C per decade. Moreover, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its last report assesses that even limiting global warming to just 1.5 °C would require an unprecedented change in many aspects of society (https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/).

For many years, scientists have studied the physiological mechanisms underlying heat stress response (HSR) and tolerance in plants. However, after the discovery of the molecular responses and regulation of heat shock proteins (HSPs) and the activation of other genes, understanding of the HSR process became more mechanistic. Major advances have been made in the molecular mechanisms of HSR and identification of genes or quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with heat tolerance in plants.

The production of plants with new alleles in HS-responsive genes and the possibility of testing these plants on innovative phenotyping platforms offer the opportunity fully to establish the role of these genes in the HSR and to develop crop plants with an increased tolerance to heat.

Temperature stress, crop yield, and food security

Temperature is one of the major environmental factors which affect plant growth, development, and yield. Temperatures persistently above optimal for plant growth may induce HS and reduce yields. At some threshold, they will be lethal. Extreme heat events can be measured in different ways: the maximum temperatures reached (intensity), how often the events occur (frequency), and how long they last (duration). HS has negative effects on crop physiology (e.g. decreased photosynthesis, increased respiration) and plant growth and yield. Another adverse effect of HS is the negative influence on the plant root system, which provides support, nutrient and water uptake, and transport to other plant organs, resulting in disrupted pollination, flowering, root development, and root growth stages.

In many species, for both cool and warm seasons, yield reduction after HS is observed as a consequence of decreasing seed- or fruit-set percentage. In wheat, exposure to short episodes (2–5 d) of HS (>24 °C) at the reproductive stage (start of heading) resulted in substantial damage to floret fertility, while a mean daily temperature of 35 °C caused total failure. Increasing the duration of high temperature at this stage reduced the grain weight linearly; similarly for pea, lentil, and chickpea. An extensive review on the threshold temperatures for several crop species was reported by. Table 1 shows threshold temperatures in vegetative and reproductive development for several crop species, together with literature indications about the losses (or gains) attributed to HS alone.

HS can impair several physiological processes linked to seed size and quality. HS during grain filling markedly decreased starch accumulation in wheat, rice, and maize. The levels of sugars such as fructose, sugar nucleotides, and hexose phosphate also declined due to HS. The decrease in sugars may be related to assimilate utilization for purposes other than edible component production. In maize, waxy grain starch content decreased, whereas protein content increased, resulting in a change of grain quality. Moreover, increasing temperature and CO2 reduced protein and micronutrient content in grain and soybean. In soybean under HS, the nutritional value of total free amino acids was reduced together with total protein concentration, while the oil concentration was significantly increased. As a general evaluation, reductions in total yield are mainly due to an alteration in balance of the source and sink activities that take place under HS.

The capacity of crop plants to overcome temperature stress has been interpreted in terms of avoidance, escape, or tolerance. Avoidance is any mechanism that permits the plant to be or to become non-susceptible to the stressor effect, annulling in this way most of its deleterious effects. In escape, plants can alter their growth cycle before the stress hits hard, such as anticipating reproduction or shedding vegetative structures. From the agronomic point of view, tolerance is certainly more interesting; being based on the endurance of the plant in stress conditions, it does not involve substantial modification of the growth habit with potential deleterious effects on yield. A heat-tolerant plant is therefore inclined to continue its growth cycle quite independently of the stress.

The contributions of ‘omics’

Conventional plant breeding strategies based mainly on phenotype selection and qualitative genetics have led breeders, after the green revolution, to achieve continuous increases in seed yield and improved yield stability, independently of the environmental cost of achieving them (Setia and ). However, the growing worldwide demand for enhancing yields of major crops is placing pressure on breeding programs to provide elite cultivars more adaptable to the ongoing changes. The complexity of the information needed to meet this challenge has prompted advances in understanding the biochemical and molecular processes that underlie important metabolic, physiological, and developmental traits which affect the ability of plants to cope with the upcoming climate change. This has provided new insights into how plants function, and promoted the development of new scientific disciplines, mainly based on high-throughput approaches.

The progress of ‘omics’ technologies, in particular genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, has enabled direct and unbiased monitoring of the factors affecting crop growth and yield in response to environmental threats. Overall, omics constitute powerful tools to reveal the complex molecular mechanisms underlying plant growth and development, and their interactions with the environment, which ultimately determine yield, nutritional value (Setia and; ), and the required level of agricultural inputs. The following sections provide some examples showing the successful application of omics in crop improvement.

Genomics and transcriptomics

Molecular responses to HS have been investigated in many plant species to identify the complex processes and pathways regulated in acclimation and protection against temperature stress. Regulation of gene expression through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms is certainly linked to both stress recognition and stress response; this aspect has been investigated at different stress levels and comparing different genetic resources. The conventional transcriptomic approach has been applied to study gene expression changes under stress conditions in many crop species, such as rice, tomato, barley, maize, wheat, soybean, brassica, and grape. More recently, application of advanced genome-wide transcriptome analyses has elucidated the roles of relevant genes from HS perception to signal transduction and stress response (Table 2). In general, most of the HS-responsive genes are involved in primary and secondary metabolism, translation, transcription, regulation, and responses to processes such as calcium, phytohormone, sugar, and lipid signaling, or protein modifications including phosphorylation. Up-regulation under HS conditions is confined mainly to transcription factors and HSPs.

The activation and production of heat shock factors (HSFs) and HSPs and the increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging activity play a key role in the responses and acclimation of plants to HS. ROS-related genes are within the main up-regulated category under HS in different plant species and have been associated with basal heat tolerance (Almeselmani et al., 2006, 2009;; ). Moreover, ROS play an important role as signal molecules involved in the transduction of intracellular and intercellular signals controlling gene expression and activity of anti-stress systems, suggesting a role for ROS in the activation of HSFs during HS.

Both HSFs and HSPs are central to the HSR and in the acquisition of thermotolerance in plants. As a result of advances in whole-genome sequencing, additional information has been gathered for the Hsp gene family. HS transcription factors (TFs) involved in heat sensing and signaling are highly conserved both structurally and functionally throughout the eukaryotic kingdom and are key players for the expression of Hsp genes. The HSF gene family has been identified and characterized in several crop species such as grape, soybean, maize, wheat, rice, and tomato. Progress in genome annotation has led to the development of the specialized HEATSTER database (http://www.cibiv.at/services/hsf/info#anfang) which can identify and correctly annotate new HSF genes in plant species.

The involvement of HSPs in the defense response following HS has been extensively reported in several plant species. Gene expression analysis was performed in tomato leaves applying MACE (massive analysis of cDNA ends), which showed that 2203 genes (9.6% of the total) had enhanced transcript abundance in response to HS. Those encoding small HSP (sHSP) family members showed the strongest induction, with nine out of 100 Hsp40 genes up-regulated in response to heat. HSF genes showed basal and stable expression in non-stressed conditions and, for some, a strong induction in response to HS. These studies also reported the importance of TFs in the regulation of HSR, since 92 of the genes up-regulated upon HS are TF genes (bHLH, bZIP, ERF, MYB, and WRKY families). These are well-known major elements in HSR and thermotolerance, highlighting the complex regulatory networks activated beyond those directly controlled by HSFs. The tomato HsfA1a TF seems to have a unique function as a master regulator for acquired thermotolerance and cannot be replaced by any other HSF.

In wheat, 6560 probe sets displayed changes in expression after heat treatment at 40 °C, with or without acclimation at 34 °C; representing Hsp genes, HSF genes, and genes encoding proteins involved in phytohormone biosynthesis/signaling, calcium and sugar signal pathways, RNA metabolism and ribosomes, as well as primary and secondary metabolism. In barley, the effects of a short-term HS on central developmental functions of the caryopsis were studied at the transcriptional level. Over 2000 differentially expressed genes were identified, equally divided between up- and down-regulation. The core HSR includes some conserved processes such as abscisic acid- (ABA) responsive gene activation, HSP-mediated protein folding, calcium signaling, ROS scavenging, and the biosynthesis of compatible solutes, which are rapidly induced. Within the down-regulated genes, it is noticeable that those involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism and cellular growth, which determine long-term negative effects, differ significantly depending on the plant developmental stage at the time of the stress.

During grain development, the main negative effects of HS are related to the decreased accumulation of storage compounds, which can have a detrimental effect on both seed quality and final yield. In wheat, HSPs can play a crucial role in gluten formation as a ‘glue’ between the reserve proteins (glutenins and gliadins) and starch. During flowering, a significant reduction in the expression of non-essential photosynthetic genes may constitute an energy-saving strategy to facilitate other key stress responses with the aim of maintaining sugar metabolism and consequently protecting pollen viability (X. ). Unraveling the complexity of high temperature tolerance may benefit from a systems biology approach (see Fig. 1).

Proteomics

Protein profiling under HS conditions helps to identify stress-responsive proteins, and the detailed investigation of these proteins reveals their function in stress tolerance mechanisms. The synthesis and accumulation of HSPs is a prompt response after exposure to high temperature and it is considered one of the most important adaptive strategies to overcome the deleterious effects of HS. The majority of HSPs are molecular chaperones involved in protein stabilization and signal transduction during HS. HSPs prevent accumulation of proteins with anomalous conformations and eliminate non-native aggregations formed during stress, with ubiquitin-mediated degradation of these proteins.

Proteomics allows the study of the direct gene products, which often differ with the level of gene regulation. This technique has been applied to investigate heat responses in rice, wheat, tomato, maize, soybean, grape, and chickpea (for references, see Table 2). The types of technique utilized for these studies have been mostly 2D gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) for protein separation, followed by MS:MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight), MS, or TOF/TOF MS/MS for protein isolation, and iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation) with LC-MS/MS for relative quantification. Other techniques have been deployed including label-free in-gel digestion together with LC-MS/MS or Orbitrap; SDS–PAGE followed by LC-MS/MS; and mass accuracy precursor alignment (MAPA) plus LC-MS. Many successful examples of proteomics applied to the study of HSPs and other HS-induced proteins have been reported (; Table 2).

Different stages of plant development have been investigated using proteomics, from seedling, to flower (anthers and pollen especially in rice and tomato), to fruit, but also spikelet and grain maturation. In rice, where HS has been studied in isolation, all classes of HSPs (high and low molecular weight) have been found among the predominant protein categories, although other protein types and Gene Ontology (GO) classes varied extensively according to the part of the plant investigated. For instance, in pollen and anthers, late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins were present in high numbers. Interestingly, proteins related to oxidative stress were identified in most of the studies on high HS, alone or in combination with other stresses. ROS are produced during HSR, which results in an oxidative imbalance within the cell. Furthermore, chloroplast function and photosynthesis are both strongly affected by ROS generated during HS, and it seems that HSPs can prevent ROS damage to the photosystems or the organelle structure. As an example, in maize, it was found that sHSP26 protects chloroplasts under HS. Other GO categories involved were sugar metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, regulatory proteins, and proteins that function in energy metabolism.

More information on stress-associated active proteins (SAAPs) in wheat has recently been reported. This study identified ~4272 SAAPs in wheat using absolute quantification methods. Some of the differentially abundant SAAPs identified were Rubisco, Rubisco activase (RCA), oxygen-evolving extrinsic protein (OEEP), HSP17, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK). Pathway analysis showed the carbon assimilation pathway, followed by starch metabolism, to be most perturbed under HS in wheat. A positive correlation was established between the expression of SAAPs at transcript and protein levels in wheat under HS.

Adaptive responses to HS also involve various post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins. There is a detailed literature on the effects of HS on PTMs such as protein phosphorylation in rice and wheat. Currently, >300 PTMs have been detected and partly characterized, and the numbers are increasing. HS has also been shown to enhance the small ubiquitin-like modification (SUMOylation) of particular proteins. SUMOylation of accessible lysines on target proteins is mediated in plants by a sequential three enzyme conjugation pathway: the E1 activating enzyme heterodimer (SAE1a or b combined with SAE2), a single E2 conjugating enzyme (SCE1), and at least two E3 ligases (SIZ1 and MMS21/HPY2). In Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Heynh), the activity of the HS TF HSFA2 was shown to be regulated by SUMOylation. Moreover, in potato, rapid changes in protein SUMOylation and serine phosphorylation were observed in response to HS. In addition, the overexpression of SlSIZ1 E3 ligase was shown to enhance heat tolerance in tomato.

Metabolomics and lipidomics

Major environmental stresses cause metabolic reorganization towards homeostasis, maintaining essential metabolism and synthesizing metabolites with stress-protective and signaling characteristics. In plants such as tomato, maize, barley, wheat, soybean, and citrus, metabolism reprogramming under HS has been studied by untargeted metabolomics. For example, in maize, under CO2 stress and a sudden HS, malate, valine, isoleucine, glucose, starch, sucrose, proline, glycine, and serine were successfully found as key players in the combined stress response. Under both heat and drought stress, amounts of amino acids, and antioxidants such as glutathione and α-tocopherol, were highly affected in two cultivars of barley; in particular, this combination of stresses led to accumulation of free amino acids in the leaf. In post-anthesis wheat, the amounts of some amino acids increased, while others decreased [l-arginine, l-histidine, l-tryptophan. l-threonine, 4-aminobutanoate (GABA), l-aspartate, and l-phenylalanine]; sugars, sugar alcohols, and other organic compounds were among the major groups of metabolites whose concentration decreased in tissue due to HS.

identified the metabolites that exhibited the greatest decreases during HS in wheat: drummondol, anthranilate, dimethylmaleate, galactoglycerol, guanine, and also glycerone. Soybean subjected to both HS and excess CO2 had decreased starch, fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose concentrations, whereas pinitol increased with temperature. found in citrus that water stress and HS, and their combination, altered metabolite levels related to glycolysis and the TCA cycle, the chloroplastic phase of the glyoxylate/dicarboxylate cycle, and the quantity of polar metabolites participating in the phenylpropanoid pathway arising from shikimic acid, depending on the level of stress. In tomato pollen, under HS, most of the putatively identified secondary metabolites belonged to three major groups: flavonoids, polyamines, and alkaloids. Other examples come from untargeted metabolomics experiments where it was found that salicylic acid, ascorbic acid, sulfur-containing molecules (glutathione), phenolic secondary metabolites, and in general all antioxidant molecules can reduce HS symptoms in many plant species. Other major aspects of high temperature stress are cell signaling, molecular transport, and the changes in lipid metabolism as a basic mechanism to regulate membrane fluidity.

Lipids, which are major components of the membranes of cells and organelles, are among the first targets of ROS produced during HS and directly by high temperatures (Narayanan et al., 2016, 2018). Stress-induced lipid peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids and other changes in membrane lipid profiles can lead to membrane damage, electrolyte leakage, and cell death. Under severe HS and long-term HS conditions, both chloroplastic and extra-plastidial glycerolipids are oxidized, yielding oxylipin-containing glycerolipids and other cytotoxic molecules such as acrolein and methyl vinyl ketone (MVK), derived from peroxidation of trienoic ω-3 fatty acids.

Accumulation of highly saturated fatty acids helps confer HS tolerance by reducing structural membrane fluidity, which is increased at high temperatures. There is an interesting correlation between the type of metabolites involved and the need to protect specific cellular functions or cell compartments from the adverse effects of stress. In addition to acyl oxidation, plants regulate other aspects of membrane lipid composition in response to changes in temperature; in particular, the chloroplast membranes that host the photosynthetic apparatus are thought to be highly vulnerable to damage caused by HS. Severe HS results in increasing frequency of membrane phase separation of non-bilayer-forming glycerolipids. Moderate HS (30–45 °C) results in thylakoid grana membrane destacking. During HS, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the major site for membrane phosphatidylcholine (PC) synthesis in plants. Free fatty acids are exported from chloroplasts and re-esterified to CoA in the cytosol. PC synthesis in the ER utilizes a mixed pool of acyl-CoA substrates via the Kennedy pathway and the PC acyl editing pathway (Lands cycle). Fatty acid desaturase 2 (FAD2) converts PC-bound 18:1 to 18:2 in the ER and, during HS, FAD2 mediates polyunsaturation of ER glycerolipids and plays a role in the plant ER stress response to HS. Chloroplastic galactolipid biosynthesis through the eukaryotic pathway needs a transfer of glycerolipids from the ER to chloroplasts by phospholipid flippase ALA10 which interacts with FAD2 affecting the degree of PC saturation. LACS4/9 proteins are also involved in this mechanism.

At the chloroplastic outer and inner membranes, five trigalactosyldiaglycerols (TGDs) and proteins TGD1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 form a transporter complex that mediates ER to plastid lipid trafficking. However, there is no concerted induction of these membrane proteins at the transcriptional level under HS in Arabidopsis. In chloroplasts, long-term HS (>1 d) decreases the levels of glycerolipids containing 16:3 and/or 18:3, and reduces the activity of all FAD enzymes. In general, during HS and other environmental stresses, conversion of monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) into digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG) increases through the action of DGDG synthases, encoded by DGD1 and DGD2. Terrestrial plants increase the ratio of DGDG to MGDG to improve thylakoid membrane stability under various abiotic stresses. MGDGs are also decreased through the action of specific lipases (DAD1; PLIP1, 2, and 3; and HIL1). These recent studies suggest that lipases which are localized in chloroplasts have an important role in the lipid remodeling process under HS.

Glycolipids and phospholipids are converted to triacylglycerol (TAG) in the form of oil bodies, as a transient storage depot for acyl groups prior to membrane lipid recycling/degradation: phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (PDAT1) transfers an acyl group from PC to diacylglycerol (DAG), and produces TAG. Mutant pdat1 seedlings are more sensitive to HS than the wild type; therefore, PDAT1 contributes to HS-induced TAG accumulation, and plays a role in HS response in Arabidopsis seedlings. Other chloroplast-localized enzymes that maintain the structure of the thylakoid membranes during HS are FAX 1, 2, and 3, and VIPP1(; N. ). HS also changes the lipid composition of the plasma membrane and of the ER; PC and PE (phosphatidylethanolamine) phospholipids are major components of extra-plastidial membranes. A decrease in the PE polyunsaturation level is likely to improve membrane stability under HS. Long-term HS increases phosphatidylserine (PS) content in the leaves of wheat.

Most of the lipidomics investigations of the response to HS have been performed on Arabidopsis, with only a few studies on crops such as wheat and rice. One example of lipidomics applied to HS in wheat found that the decrease in the photosynthetic rate under HS is due to lipid desaturation, oxidation, acylation, and consequent damage to organelles. The membrane protein–lipid associations are of great importance for the maintenance of membrane fluidity; in this context, overexpression of the gene OsFBN1 (coding for a fibrillin) facilitates the import of lipids to the chloroplast during HS and the consequent grain filling.

It has been suggested that diminishing the ROS pool directly has positive consequences on the state of the lipids. For example, modulating antioxidant defenses and the detoxification of methylglyoxal (MG) through the application of exogenous glutathione to mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) R.Wilczek] increased the tolerance of the plants to HS in the short term (48 h). The increase in certain plant hormones can also be beneficial to the lipid status in rice during HS. For example, high concentrations of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) or brassinosteroids can successfully initiate a mechanism for the decrease of primary ROS caused by HS that attack lipid membranes (MGDGs and sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerols) and thylakoids. In a non-targeted lipidomics experiment in rice under both HS and water stress, 298 lipids responded to the changes in conditions; of these, 128 were identified. Interestingly, in the case of HS, a decrease in the unsaturation of lipids was predominant and can be linked to an increase in the cell membranes’ rigidity. In a lipidome-wide study of tomato leaf under HS, changes in 791 molecules were detected between 20 °C and 38 °C. These results indicate that the most important changes at the lipidome-wide level occur in tocopherols, plastoquinone/plastoquinol (and their metabolites), and in the degree of fatty acid saturation of galactolipids.

Epigenetic modifications

The epigenetic changes that occur at the DNA level through methylation of cytosine residues or at the level of chromatin by post-translational modifications of histones can result in altered gene transcription, and are an important mechanism in regulating gene expression during development and in response to environmental stimuli. The persistence of a memory of temperature stress is dependent not only on the persistence of HSPs and their TFs but also on the expression of certain genes relevant for epigenetic signatures. A primary stress episode can sensitize plants for acclimation to subsequent stresses, resulting in faster or stronger changes in gene expression upon repeated exposure, constituting a physiological priming mechanism. This primary event is fundamental in the acquisition of thermotolerance. A comprehensive RNA-Seq (RNA sequencing) analysis of gene expression and splicing events in HS-primed and non-primed plants has been carried out. This study showed alternative splicing as a novel and significant part of HS priming-induced memory and that this is critical for enhanced stress tolerance. However, most studies have been carried out in Arabidopsis, and in cultivated plants the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved still represents a challenge.

Further epigenetic control is due to miRNAs, which are emerging as factors involved in transcriptional regulation and HS memory. miRNAs are involved directly in HS adaptation by acting as post-transcriptional regulators. Plant miRNAs bind their target transcripts and cleave and/or degrade the target mRNA molecule. The regulation of stress-responsive genes through activation of miRNAs is particularly important under abiotic stress conditions.

Experimental validation of miRNA targets is still a challenge in polyploid crops including wheat. Recently, HS-responsive miRNAs have been reported from several susceptible and tolerant cultivars, with responses primarily being invoked within 24 h of treatment. Furthermore, performed a detailed miRNA and isomiR (miRNA isoforms) annotation and validated the HS-regulated miRNA target genes associated with thermotolerance. They confirmed a high degree of conservation between dicots and monocots for miR156 regulation of squamosa promoter-binding-like protein, miR159 regulation of MYB transcription factor, miR166 regulation of homeobox leucine-zipper protein, and miR398 regulation of SOD. New miRNA targets were also identified for organelle-specific transcripts such as pentatricopeptide repeat-containing proteins and mitochondrial transcription termination factor-like proteins.

Interestingly, several miRNAs showed altered expression patterns under heat and cold stresses in wheat, including miR164 (targeting HSP17) and miR319 (targeting a MYB transcription factor). These are up-regulated during a cold stress response but down-regulated in response to HS. On the contrary, miR160 and miR164 were down-regulated in response to heat, resulting in the induction of HSP expression, and up-regulated under cold stress. Regulating mechanisms triggered by high temperature can be reversed by cold stress, although the underlying mechanisms may be similar.

Breeding for heat tolerance

To ensure food security for future generations, agriculture must double the current crop production rate despite the predicted threats, which include climate change, decrease in arable land and desertification, salinization, and emerging diseases. Plant breeders need affordable and scalable solutions to achieve a more sustainable production. Approaches to reach the essential goal of producing more with less include (i) harnessing natural and artificial mutations; (ii) exploiting the available genetic resources to produce new genetic material more tolerant to HS and related secondary stresses; (iii) improving the ability to screen and identify the available sources of resilience; and (iv) developing new breeding techniques.

Conventional breeding approach

The effects of HS and prolonged heat waves on food production are heightened by a greater genetic uniformity in crop plants resulting from the narrowing of the varieties used in developed countries. This has prompted increased efforts to identify new genetic resources and useful traits to mitigate or counteract the effects of climate change on crop productivity (Table 3).

It is well established that responses in crop species to abiotic stress, including HS, form a complex quantitative trait whose inheritance is controlled by a synergy between genes identified as QTLs, distributed throughout the genome. Traditionally QTL mapping has been used to identify new genetic variability and new sources of tolerance for introduction to breeding programs. However, QTL regions can be quite large and may contain many genes to be investigated as potential candidate genes, and many QTL studies had limited value for breeding because of low marker density. More recently, genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) has allowed an increase in the number of markers, in particular SNPs (single nuclear polymorphisms), evenly distributed throughout the genome. In this way, it is now possible to obtain genetic maps with high resolution and precise mapping of QTLs, and in some cases identifying candidate genes controlling associated quantitative traits. The application of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) permits narrowing down the candidate regions to explore specific haplotypes in natural populations and even wild species.

In wheat, several genomic regions associated with heat tolerance have been mapped using QTL analysis, often combined with GWAS and GBS. Major QTL clusters associated with drought and heat tolerance have been mapped on several chromosomes. GWAS of sorghum seedlings under HS has identified associated key genomic regions, and specific alleles from these regions can be used to develop heat-tolerant sorghum cultivars. Through inheritance studies, reported two dominant genes controlling most of the heritable tolerance to heat at pod set in cowpea. Four QTLs were identified in cowpea as associated with pod set number per peduncle under HS, and markers were utilized in breeding applications. Syntenic analysis of the closely related soybean genome identified HSPs and HSFs in these QTL regions. In rice, heat tolerance at the flowering stage is controlled by several QTLs that have been used in breeding programs based on gene pyramiding (Ye et al., 2012, 2015; ).

A major QTL for thermotolerance was successfully identified and cloned in African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud.); thermo-tolerance 1 (TT1) encodes an α2 subunit of the 26S proteasome involved in the degradation of ubiquitinated proteins. The allele OgTT1 of the thermotolerant accession permitted increased thermotolerance through a more efficient elimination of cytotoxic denatured proteins and effective maintenance of heat response processes than the non-tolerant cultivar carrying the OsTT1 allele. Overexpression of OgTT1 was associated with enhanced thermotolerance in rice, Arabidopsis, and Festuca elata Keng f. ex E.B.Alexeev (X.M. ).

In tomato, several QTLs involved in heat tolerance have been identified, while two QTL hot spots for heat tolerance with respect to grain yield were found in maize.

Screening for genotypic differences, and effective selection techniques, are crucial for identifying heat-tolerant parental sources and for inheritance studies, and also for crop improvement by combining other traits which are influenced by heat tolerance. Since photosynthesis and reproductive development processes are directly adversely affected by HS, desired characteristics of a heat-tolerant variety will be higher photosynthetic rates (e.g. stay-green leaves), enhanced membrane thermostability, and stable pod set or grain production under high temperature conditions. Methods for breeding for heat tolerance in cowpea involved selection for abundant flower production and greater pod set under higher night temperatures and long-day growing conditions. These efforts resulted in release of the HStolerant cowpea variety California Blackeye 27 (CB27) with better yield. This variety was crossed with Pima (a Nigerian heat-tolerant germplasm) giving Apagbaala, a cowpea variety intended for Ghana. However, this was not heat tolerant in Ghana even though it performed well under Californian growing conditions.

The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has also been investigated. Initial screening at CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical) of a germplasm core set for HS tolerance identified 30 resistant lines. Breeding programs utilizing these genetic resources helped to develop heat-tolerant bush and climbing bean lines. Moreover, introgression of Tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolious A.Gray) genes into P. vulgaris gave an interspecific line that was used as a parent for breeding heat-tolerant lines. Recent screening of chickpea genotypes indicated the existence of extensive genotypic variation for reproductive stage heat tolerance; further studies led to the release of heat-tolerant breeding line ICCV 92944 for late-sown conditions.

Targeted breeding efforts will help to build heat tolerance in crops. A conceptual model to improve heat tolerance in wheat was proposed involving genetically determined physiological traits such as light interception, radiation use efficiency, and partitioning of total assimilates. The physiological breeding approach combines all these traits towards generating a cumulative genetic effect on yield. Data sets from three different spring bread wheat nurseries at CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center) with different breeding goals were extensively analyzed, and the results showed that spring wheat breeding targeted against abiotic stress delivers better genetic gains in warmer environments. The performance of yield traits under heat and non-stressed environments has been used to identify heat-tolerant genotypes for breeding programs. The identification of critical genes controlling heat tolerance in common wheat led to the release of new cultivars of bread wheat and durum wheat capable of withstanding severe heat, for example the cultivar Faraj, which is able to maintain yield under heat and drought conditions.

It has been shown that compared with direct selection for grain yield, indirect selection through secondary traits with high heritability and significant association with grain yield under stress is a more effective approach in stress tolerance breeding. In maize, traits associated with reproductive success under heat stress (anthesis–silking interval, pollen viability, stigma receptivity, tassel blast, tassel sterility, and seed set percentage under open pollinated conditions) and other morpho-physiological traits (leaf firing, senescence, and chlorophyll content) were studied along with grain yield for the selection of HS-tolerant germplasms. As a result, two maize genotypes, VL05728 and VL05799, with better seed setting due to reproductive success under stress were identified as tolerant lines for heat stress. Several maize breeding programs have successfully increased yields in HS conditions. The identification of suitable donors, highly tolerant to HS and to the combination of HS and drought stress, was successfully achieved by evaluating 300 or 29 (CIMMYT) maize inbred lines. These studies are the best examples to show the significant molecular diversity among maize inbred lines selected for heat tolerance

Reproductive stage HS in rice causes substantial yield loss. Delayed flowering, reduced pollen dispersal, low pollen production, spikelet sterility due to poor anther dehiscence, and impaired starch synthesis during grain development are the major problem areas. Natural genetic variation for HS tolerance exists in rice, and significant genetic components controlling these variations have been identified. Several QTLs and genes associated with HS tolerance have been reported, and some have been characterized, but more translational research is needed in this area. Guodao 6 and Xieyou 46 are heat-tolerant hybrids developed with stable high rates of grain setting and spikelet fertility under HS. Other varieties including Fusaotome (tolerant), Hanahikari, Koshijiwase, and Tentakaku (moderately tolerant) were used in breeding for grain quality under heat stress. In rice, HS-tolerant traits from line N22 have been used for introgression into other varieties for developing climate change-ready rice. QTLs for HS tolerance during the reproductive stage were identified using a recombinant inbred population between N22 and IR64.

In tomatoes, reproduction is particularly sensitive to continuous mild heat, which mainly affects pollen viability. The Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC) has identified 39 tolerant lines after several years of natural genetic variation studies. Some of these were used in their tomato breeding programs which produced HS-tolerant lines, such as Equinox and Sun Leaper. Another example is the development of ‘Amelia’, a heat-tolerant tomato cultivar for tropical conditions. Identification of more QTLs associated with heat tolerance in tomatoes could enhance breeding efforts for development of stress-tolerant tomato varieties.

The development of molecular tools to accelerate breeding is crucial for the identification of useful traits and their application in breeding programs. In particular, marker-assisted selection (MAS) to improve breeding efficiency has become commonplace. Many MAS strategies have been developed, including marker-assisted backcrossing with foreground and background selection, enrichment of favorable alleles in early generations, and selection for quantitative traits using markers at multiple loci and across multiple cycles of selection. MAS requires the use of markers flanking the target locus, and is considered one of the most efficient methods when working on complex traits having a quantitative hereditary characteristic, such as HS tolerance. MAS can be used in forward breeding to enrich the allelic frequency for a few desired traits with strong additive QTLs in early selection cycles, to introgress favorable alleles into an elite background, and for integration of (native) traits into a breeding pipeline. This approach has been used in maize to develop improved lines for stress-prone environments.

The exploitation of GWAS has led to the approach called genomic selection (GS) a promising tool to design novel breeding programs and to develop new marker-based models for genetic evaluation. The most important factor for its successful and effective implementation in crop species is the availability of genome-wide high-throughput, cost-effective, and flexible molecular markers, having low ascertainment bias, suitable for large population sizes, as well as for both model and non-model crop species with or without the reference genome sequence. As a pre-breeding tool, it can serve to identify genetic materials with beneficial variation for complex traits, predicting the breeding value of an individual within a breeding population. It also provides new opportunities to increase genetic gain of complex traits efficiently. GS has been applied to active breeding programs in several crop species including wheat, rice, soybean, sunflower, maize, chickpea, and grapes.

GS and marker-assisted recurrent selection (MARS), widely used in the private sector, are proving efficient for the development of novel cultivars in many crops. The major advantage of GS with respect to MAS/MARS is that alleles with minor effects can be captured and used in selection. For both approaches, success depends on excellent phenotypic characterization during the discovery or training phase, respectively.

New breeding techniques to increase heat tolerance

Genetic modification through biotechnology and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) is a powerful strategy that offers novel opportunities to improve crop adaptability. However, general public concerns and complex legislation are limiting the application of NBTs. Encouraging data collected from genetics can be exploited to significantly increase tolerance to both biotic stresses and abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, heat, and cold. Several studies have used TF genes and other genes associated with abiotic stress tolerance as targets for development of new varieties. Crops including wheat, maize, tomato, and rice have been genetically modified to enhance thermotolerance, targeting mainly HSPs and HSFs. Transgenic cotton plants developed to overexpress an HSP, AtHSP101, in pollen had improved pollen germination and pollen tube growth under high temperature. This significantly enhanced the overall heat tolerance of reproductive tissues and reduced yield losses due to high temperature, supported by both greenhouse and field evaluation of transgenic plants. A survey of the transgenic lines identified to enhance heat tolerance in several species is reported in Table 4.

The availability of genomic sequences for several crops together with genome editing techniques has opened up new breeding possibilities for almost any given desirable trait. The most common technique available for genome editing, clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), modifies a genome in a targeted manner, and has been used in nearly 20 crop species so far including rice, tomato, potato, cotton, soybean, maize, sorghum, and wheat (Table 5). There are at least 13 different patents on new CRISPR/Cas9 approaches, which makes editing even more simple and secure, and new perspectives in the production of novel genetic variability are opened up by its application as an allelic-drive tool, engineering and repairing pathways, and introducing specific point mutations or insertions.

Currently, attempts exploiting genome editing to increase heat tolerance target several genes mainly involved in the ethylene response and TFs, with the final aim to increase yield under abiotic stresses including HS. However, despite the abundance of novel genetic material generated through CRISPR, few field experiments have been conducted associated with breeding programs.

Mutational breeding

Mutational breeding strategies have been applied since the late 1990s to generate new variability in plants. An important breakthrough came with the development of the TILLING (targeting induced local lesions in genome) approach, which provides a relatively simple strategy to identify mutations (lesions) in a target sequence independently of their phenotypic effect. TILLING approaches require a population of, typically, ethyl methanesulfonate- (EMS) induced mutants based on the capacity of the chemical agent to generate point mutations distributed randomly in the genome, and a screening method to identify individuals with mutations in the target gene. TILLING and its updated form, established for polyploidy species through the use of exome capture and the development of the in silico TILLING database, have been used extensively to investigate genetic variability in several species mainly targeting quality traits.

Although in TILLING approaches mutagenesis is untargeted and does not provide the versatility of genome editing, crops improved using chemical or radiation mutagenesis via TILLING are not regulated as transgenic organisms in most jurisdictions, increasing their commercial competitiveness with the more precise genome editing approaches.

Recently, identified a collection of four new small Hsp26 (sHsp26) alleles suitable for enhancing heat tolerance in durum wheat using both in silico and in vivo TILLING approaches. Following application of TILLING, the ability of a mutated HSP to enhance heat tolerance in tomato has also been demonstrated. In rice, a TILLING population has been screened for mutations in the HSP genes, and a number of lines showing preliminary enhanced tolerance to HS may be useful for future breeding programs (; Table 6).

Conclusions

There are several examples of heat-tolerant varieties in major crops such as wheat, maize, rice, tomato, and legumes successfully developed through conventional breeding. These efforts can be fast-tracked using modern genomic and phenotyping tools. The first HS gene was identified and cloned in tobacco with the pioneering work of. This gene was shown to encode HSP70, which strongly accumulated in heat-stressed tissue.

Subsequent molecular studies revealed a more complex system with the discovery of HSFs (reviewed in ), organelle-specific HSPs, and linkage between HS and the induction of an alternative splicing system capable of directing de novo HSP synthesis in conditions where most proteins were either produced abnormally or were degraded, remodeling the global protein machinery in cells. However, neither these discoveries nor the networking of all the known elements have produced a satisfying picture of the plant heat stress response. QTLs for heat tolerance offer a different, potentially complementary, interpretation with a stronger emphasis on physiology of reproduction in heat stress conditions.

Current data indicate that at least two different genetic systems can protect plants from the otherwise lethal effects of heat stress: (i) a series of Mendelian HS genes acting possibly in a dominant or semi-dominant way; and (ii) a small number of QTLs which allow plant growth and reproduction under different stress conditions. There has been little progress using transgenic approaches in studies of model plant to crop plant translational genetics. Extensive knowledge has become available on physiological, biochemical, and molecular regulation through advanced phenotyping and multi-omics tools developed over the last decade. All of this suggests that significant advances in crop improvement will be achieved, resulting in the development of new high-yielding varieties with greater heat tolerance and adaptation to climate change.

Author contributions

The authors contributed equally to the preparation of the review. MJ took on the responsibility of connecting all the different tasks distributed as follows: EM, gene ontology and system biology; MM, protein and metabolites; MG, gene expression and epigenetic modification; BV, gene expression and breeding; and MJ, induction of HS response; NM and HTN coordinated the planning and the writing of the review.

References 344

  1. 1.

    Acuña-Galindo MA, Mason RE, Subramanian NK, Hays DB 2015 Meta-analysis of wheat QTL regions associated with adaptation to drought and heat stress. Crop Science55, 477–492.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Alam MA, Seetharam K, Zaidi PH, Dinesh A, Vinayan MT, Nath UK 2017 Dissecting heat stress tolerance in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research204, 110–119.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Almeselmani M, Deshmukh P, Sairam R 2009 High temperature stress tolerance in wheat genotypes: role of antioxidant defence enzymes. Acta Agronomica Hungarica57, 1–14.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Almeselmani M, Deshmukh PS, Sairam RK, Kushwaha SR, Singh TP 2006 Protective role of antioxidant enzymes under high temperature stress. Plant Science171, 382–388.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.04.009

  5. 5.

    Alptekin B, Langridge P, Budak H 2017 Abiotic stress miRNomes in the Triticeae. Functional & Integrative Genomics17, 145–170.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10142-016-0525-9

  6. 6.

    Alsamir M, Ahmad NM, Keitel C, Mahmood T, Trethowan R 2017 Identification of high-temperature tolerant and agronomically viable tomato (S. lycopersicum) genotypes from a diverse germplasm collection. Advances in Crop Science and Technology5, 1000299.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Altschuler M, Mascarenhas JP 1982 Heat shock proteins and effects of heat shock in plants. Plant Molecular Biology1, 103–115.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00024974

  8. 8.

    Arce D, Spetale F, Krsticevic F, Cacchiarelli P, Las Rivas J, Ponce S, Pratta G, Tapia E 2018 Regulatory motifs found in the small heat shock protein (sHSP) gene family in tomato. BMC Genomics19, 860.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12864-018-5190-z

  9. 9.

    Arikit S, Xia R, Kakrana A, et al. 2014 An atlas of soybean small RNAs identifies phased siRNAs from hundreds of coding genes. The Plant Cell26, 4584–4601.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.114.131847

  10. 10.

    Arshad MS, Farooq M, Asch F, Krishna JSV, Prasad PVV, Siddique KHM 2017 Thermal stress impacts reproductive development and grain yield in rice. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry115, 57–72.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.03.011

  11. 11.

    Asthir B, Koundal A, Bains NS 2012 Putrescine modulates antioxidant defense response in wheat under high temperature stress. Biologia Plantarum56, 757–761.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Baldet P, Bres C, Okabe Y, Mauxion J-P, Just D, Bournonville C, Ferrand C, Mori K, Ezura H, Rothan C 2013 Investigating the role of vitamin C in tomato through TILLING identification of ascorbate-deficient tomato mutants. Plant Biotechnology30, 309–314.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Bänziger M, Edmeades GO, Beck DL, Bellon MR 2000 Breeding for drought and nitrogen stress tolerance in maize: from theory to practice. Mexico: CIMMYT.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Bänziger M, Lafitte HR 1997 Efficiency of secondary traits for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments. Crop Science37, 1110–1117.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Barghi SS, Mostafaii H, Peighami F, Zakaria RA 2012 Path analysis of yield and its components in lentil under end season heat condition. International Journal of Agriculture: Research and Review2, 969–974.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Barnabás B, Jäger K, Fehér A 2008 The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant, Cell & Environment31, 11–38.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01727.x

  17. 17.

    Barnett T, Altschuler M, McDaniel CN, Mascarenhas JP 1979 Heat shock induced proteins in plant cells. Genesis1, 331–340.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Bassi FM, Bentley AR, Charmet G, Ortiz R, Crossa J 2016 Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.). Plant Science242, 23–36.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.08.021

  19. 19.

    Berz J, Simm S, Schuster S, Scharf KD, Schleiff E, Ebersberger I 2019 HEATSTER: a database and web server for identification and classification of heat stress transcription factors in plants. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights13, 1177932218821365.

    Not in our library10.1177/1177932218821365

  20. 20.

    Beyene Y, Semagn K, Mugo S, et al. 2016 Performance and grain yield stability of maize populations developed using marker-assisted recurrent selection and pedigree selection procedures. Euphytica208, 285–297.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10681-015-1590-1

  21. 21.
  22. 22.

    Bhattacharjee S 2012 An inductive pulse of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment restores redox-homeostasis and oxidative membrane damage under extremes of temperature in two rice cultivars. Plant Growth Regulation68, 395–410.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Bhattacharya A 2019 Effect of high temperature on crop productivity and metabolism of macro molecules. London: Academic Press.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Bheemanahalli R, Sathishraj R, Manoharan M, Sumanth HN, Muthurajan R, Ishimaru T, Krishna JS 2017 Is early morning flowering an effective trait to minimize heat stress damage during flowering in rice?Field Crops Research203, 238–242.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fcr.2016.11.011

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Bita CE, Zenoni S, Vriezen WH, Mariani C, Pezzotti M, Gerats T 2011 Temperature stress differentially modulates transcription in meiotic anthers of heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive tomato plants. BMC Genomics12, 384.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2164-12-384

  27. 27.

    Blair MW, Iriarte G, Beebe S 2006 QTL analysis of yield traits in an advanced backcross population derived from a cultivated Andean × wild common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cross. Theoretical and Applied Genetics112, 1149–1163.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00122-006-0217-2

  28. 28.

    Blomstedt CK, Gleadow RM, O’Donnell N, et al. 2012 A combined biochemical screen and TILLING approach identifies mutations in Sorghum bicolor L. Moench resulting in acyanogenic forage production. Plant Biotechnology Journal10, 54–66.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00646.x

  29. 29.

    Botella C, Sautron E, Boudiere L, Michaud M, Dubots E, Yamaryo-Botté Y, Albrieux C, Marechal E, Block MA, Jouhet J 2016 ALA10, a phospholipid flippase, controls FAD2/FAD3 desaturation of phosphatidylcholine in the ER and affects chloroplast lipid composition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology170, 1300–1314.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.15.01557

  30. 30.

    Botticella E, Sestili F, Hernandez-Lopez A, Phillips A, Lafiandra D 2011 High resolution melting analysis for the detection of EMS induced mutations in wheat Sbella genes. BMC Plant Biology11, 156.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2229-11-156

  31. 31.

    Budak H, Akpinar BA 2015 Plant miRNAs: biogenesis, organization and origins. Functional & Integrative Genomics15, 523–531.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10142-015-0451-2

  32. 32.

    Burke JJ, Chen J 2015 Enhancement of reproductive heat tolerance in plants. PLoS One10, e0122933.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0122933

  33. 33.

    Cairns JE, Crossa J, Zaidi PH, et al. 2013 Identification of drought, heat, and combined drought and heat tolerant donors in maize. Crop Science53, 1335.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Cairns JE, Prasanna BM 2018 Developing and deploying climate-resilient maize varieties in the developing world. Current Opinion in Plant Biology45, 226–230.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.004

  35. 35.

    Cantalapiedra CP, García-Pereira MJ, Gracia MP, Igartua E, Casas AM, Contreras-Moreira B 2017 Large differences in gene expression responses to drought and heat stress between elite barley cultivar Scarlett and a Spanish landrace. Frontiers in Plant Science8, 647.

    Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2017.00647

  36. 36.

    Casaretto JA, El-Kereamy A, Zeng B, Stiegelmeyer SM, Chen X, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ 2016 Expression of OsMYB55 in maize activates stress-responsive genes and enhances heat and drought tolerance. BMC Genomics17, 312.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12864-016-2659-5

  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    Chakraborty K, Bishi SK, Singh AL, Zala PV, Mahatma MK, Kalariya KA, Jat RA 2018 Rapid induction of small heat shock proteins improves physiological adaptation to high temperature stress in peanut. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science204, 285–297.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Chakraborty S, Newton AC 2011 Climate change, plant diseases and food security: an overview. Plant Pathology60, 2–14.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Chakraborty U, Pradhan D 2011 High temperature-induced oxidative stress in Lens culinaris, role of antioxidants and amelioration of stress by chemical pre-treatments. Journal of Plant Interactions6, 43–52.

    Not in our library

All 344 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.