No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future
Jacques Donnez, Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
Human Reproduction Update · 2016 · Review
Abstract
Uterine fibroids (also known as leiomyomas or myomas) are the most common form of benign uterine tumors. Clinical presentations include abnormal bleeding, pelvic masses, pelvic pain, infertility, bulk symptoms and obstetric complications.Almost a third of women with leiomyomas will request treatment due to symptoms. Current management strategies mainly involve surgical interventions, but the choice of treatment is guided by patient's age and desire to preserve fertility or avoid 'radical' surgery such as hysterectomy. The management of uterine fibroids also depends on the number, size and location of the fibroids. Other surgical and non-surgical approaches include myomectomy by hysteroscopy, myomectomy by laparotomy or laparoscopy, uterine artery embolization and interventions performed under radiologic or ultrasound guidance to induce thermal ablation of the uterine fibroids.There are only a few randomized trials comparing various therapies for fibroids. Further investigations are required as there is a lack of concrete evidence of effectiveness and areas of uncertainty surrounding correct management according to symptoms. The economic impact of uterine fibroid management is significant and it is imperative that new treatments be developed to provide alternatives to surgical intervention.There is growing evidence of the crucial role of progesterone pathways in the pathophysiology of uterine fibroids due to the use of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) such as ulipristal acetate (UPA). The efficacy of long-term intermittent use of UPA was recently demonstrated by randomized controlled studies.The need for alternatives to surgical intervention is very real, especially for women seeking to preserve their fertility. These options now exist, with SPRMs which are proven to treat fibroid symptoms effectively. Gynecologists now have new tools in their armamentarium, opening up novel strategies for the management of uterine fibroids.
Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Uterine fibroids (also known as leiomyomas or myomas) are the most common form of benign uterine tumors. They are monoclonal tumors of uterine smooth muscle, thus originating from the myometrium. They are composed of large amounts of extracellular matrix (ECM) containing collagen, fibronectin and proteoglycans. Leiomyomas occur in 50–60% of women, rising to 70% by the age of 50, and, in 30% of cases, cause morbidity due to abnormal uterine bleeding (heavy menstrual bleeding inducing anemia) and pelvic pressure (urinary symptoms, constipation and tenesmus). Clinical presentations of uterine leiomyomas include pelvic masses, pelvic pain, infertility and obstetric complications.
Risk factors
The risk factors for uterine fibroids are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Race
Race constitutes an important risk factor for leiomyoma development. An US study found that the incidence of uterine fibroids was 60% by age 35 among African-American women, increasing to >80% by age 50, while Caucasian women showed a rate of 40% by age 35, increasing to 70% by age 50. Differences in gene expression in uterine fibroids between these two groups may influence these growth rates. Nevertheless, it is clear that African-American women have a greater chance of being affected by uterine fibroids, particularly at an earlier age. Among women of African origin living in Europe, a similar trend has been observed, with more severe symptoms and surgery required at a younger age. Moreover, recurrence rates after surgery (myomectomy) may be as high as 59% after an interval of 4–5 years for women of African origin.
Age
followed the size of 262 leiomyomas from 72 women for up to 12 months using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The average growth rate was 9% over 6 months, but growth rates differed between races when age was taken into account. White women under 35 years of age had faster-growing tumors than white women over 45, who exhibited a comparatively slow growth rate. On the other hand, women of African origin did not show any decrease in myoma growth rates with age.
Moreover, delaying the first pregnancy until the third decade of life also places women at higher risk of uterine fibroids.
Early menarche
Menarche at an early age increases the risk of developing fibroids and is also considered a risk factor for other hormonally mediated diseases, such as endometrial and breast cancers.
Parity
Pregnancy has been found to have a protective effect on the development of uterine fibroids, but the mechanism remains unclear. It has been suggested that during post-partum uterine remodeling, small lesions may be subject to selective apoptosis. Furthermore fibroid tissue may be highly susceptible to ischemia during both uterine remodeling and parturition.
Caffeine and alcohol
An association has been reported between alcohol and caffeine intake and an increased risk of developing uterine fibroids in a study concerning the health of women of African origin.
Genetic factors
Some specific genetic alterations are linked to fibroid growth. performed whole genome sequencing and gene expression profiling of 38 uterine leiomyomas and corresponding myometrium. The common occurrence of chromothripsis in uterine fibroids suggests that it also plays a role in their genesis and progression.
Other factors
General health status may also be predictive of leiomyoma growth, with factors such as obesity and high blood pressure playing a role. A diet rich in red meat appears to increase the risk of developing leiomyomas, while smoking decreases the risk, for unknown reasons.
Classifications
Numerous classifications of myomas can be found in the literature. All of them take into account the degree of intramural extension and/or uterine cavity distortion. The fibroid classification adopted by the ESGE (European Society for Gynecological Endoscopy) has the advantage of being very simple (G0 is a pedunculated intrauterine myoma, G1 has its largest part (>50%) in the uterine cavity, and G2 has its largest part (>50%) in the myometrium).
More recently, the FIGO classification was published, describing eight types of fibroids as well as a hybrid class (association of two types of myomas) (Fig. 2). As different types of fibroids are often present at the same time (depending on the site), this classification offers a more representative ‘map’ of fibroid distribution and will be used further for the establishment of new algorithms.
Symptoms
Many fibroids are asymptomatic, but in 30–40% of cases, they show a variety of symptoms, depending on the location and size. Fibroids can cause heavy menstrual bleeding with subsequent anemia, which could be life-threatening. African-American women have more severe symptoms in terms of heavy bleeding and anemia compared to white women. Large fibroids can also result in pressure symptoms (bulk symptoms) that may be responsible for bowel and bladder dysfunction, including urgency, increased daytime urinary frequency and urinary incontinence. Abdominal distention or distortion and pelvic pressure on the ureters (causing hydronephrosis) and pelvic blood vessels (particularly pelvic veins) could also interfere with quality of life (QoL).
Dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain are frequently encountered, impacting on QoL and impairing daily activities. Infertility and recurrent miscarriage may also be symptoms of fibroids, depending on their location and size, especially for submucous and intramural myomas distorting the uterine cavity.
Fibroids can impair fertility through several possible mechanisms, including: (1) alteration of the local anatomy (anatomic distortion of the uterine cavity), with subsequent alterations to endometrial function; (2) functional changes, such as increased uterine contractility and impairment of the endometrial and myometrial blood supply and (3) changes to the local hormone milieu and paracrine molecular changes induced by fibroids, which could impair gamete transport and/or reduce blastocyst implantation.
Moreover, fibroids can affect obstetric outcomes. Inflammatory pathways, associated or not with other reproductive disorders, may impair pregnancy outcomes. Fibroids are significantly associated with preterm delivery (<37 weeks), primary cesarean section, breech presentation and lower birthweight infants. Very recently, a higher incidence of short cervix was also observed during pregnancy in women with fibroids.
Pelvic examination
Examination of the pelvis may reveal an enlarged uterus or mass. If fibroids are suspected and a woman reports heavy menstrual bleeding, a hemoglobin evaluation will allow detection of iron deficiency anemia.
Ultrasonography
An ultrasound is the gold standard test for uterine fibroids. Its widespread availability enables easy and inexpensive confirmation in almost all instances. Moreover, ultrasonography after infusion of saline into the uterine cavity can delineate submucous myomas and indicate the proximity of intramural myomas to the endometrial cavity. The advent of 3D imaging technology has seen 3D ultrasound establishes itself as a useful tool for the investigation of myometrial pathology due to its ability to reconstruct the coronal plane of the uterus.
Hysteroscopy
A hysteroscopy may be required to differentiate intracavitary myomas and large endometrial polyps. Hysteroscopy is usually performed in an outpatient setting and does not require any anesthesia. Ultrasonography with saline infusion and diagnostic hysteroscopy should be considered more as complementary examinations when hysteroscopic myomectomy is indicated. Of course, in case of irregular bleeding or if the patient has risk factors for endometrial hyperplasia (obesity, chronic anovulation), hysteroscopy may be combined with an endometrial biopsy.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI can provide information on the number of fibroids, their size, vascularization, relationship with the endometrial cavity and serosal surface, and boundaries with normal myometrium (Fig. 3). It should nevertheless be stressed that like ultrasonography, MRI cannot diagnose malignancy with any certainty. While MRI findings can suggest a diagnosis of sarcoma, there is currently no form of preoperative testing which can definitively rule it out. Possibly in the future, new types of imaging will improve the accuracy of detecting sarcoma, which remains a very infrequent condition (1/1500 in women aged <40 years and 1/1100 in women aged 40–44).
Current surgical management strategies
As stressed by, there are areas of uncertainty surrounding the management of myomas, as only a few randomized trials have compared different therapies for fibroids. Moreover, data on their comparative effectiveness in terms of future fertility are lacking. There are also inadequate data on long-term outcomes in women who have undergone hysterectomy according to indication. Prospective data and studies are essential to compare different options and evaluate long-term outcomes with regard to QoL, recurrence of symptoms (bleeding, bulk symptoms), fertility and even complications.
Indeed, in a cohort study of 30 117 Nurse's Health Study participants undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease, bilateral oophorectomy was found to be associated with increased mortality in patients under 50 years of age who had never used estrogen therapy.
While guidelines exist in the literature, the risks and benefits of each option should be discussed with the patient. It should also be stressed that many other factors need to be taken into account, including the skill of the surgeons involved, as well as the experience of different centers in the available techniques.
Current management strategies involve mainly surgical interventions, but the choice of treatment is guided by the patient's age and desired to preserve fertility or avoid ‘radical’ surgery such as hysterectomy. Other surgical and non-surgical approaches include myomectomy by hysteroscopy, myomectomy by laparotomy or laparoscopy, uterine artery embolization (UAE) and other interventions performed under radiologic or ultrasound guidance (Fig. 4).
Hysteroscopic myomectomy
Over the last 30 years, advances in instruments and techniques have promoted hysteroscopic myomectomy to the rank of a standard minimally invasive surgical procedure for submucous myomas. Small fibroids (<2 cm) are now routinely removed in an outpatient setting according to the technique described by Bettocchi.
Depending on personal experience and available equipment, the gynecologist has a choice of several alternative procedures.
The first involves cutting the base of pedunculated fibroids with either the resectoscopic loop or laser fiber. The base of the pedicle is cut and the fibroid is extracted by forceps or may be left in place.
The second alternative is a complete excision of fibroids by a one-step procedure. The most commonly used approach is the slicing technique. Repeated and progressive passage of the cutting loop allows the surgeon to cut the myoma into small chips. The operation is considered complete when the fasciculate fibers of the myometrium are visualized. Hysteroscopic resection is effective and safe and should be considered the technique of choice for type 1 myomas. The development of intrauterine morcellators has facilitated the implementation of hysteroscopic myomectomy. If the myoma is large (>3 cm in diameter), there is an increased risk of operative complications (perforation, bleeding and fluid intravasation) and damage to surrounding myometrium due to use of electrosurgery. Interestingly, ) demonstrated that during surgery, myometrial thickness increases when myoma slices are removed, leading to protrusion of the intramural component into the uterine cavity.
The third alternative is myomectomy by a two-step procedure (for large type 1–3 myomas of according to the FIGO classification, ). After resection or ablation of the protruded portion of the myoma during first-step hysteroscopy, the residual intramural component rapidly migrates to the uterine cavity, with a parallel increase in myometrial thickness, allowing complete and safe myoma excision during second-step hysteroscopy.
With all the techniques described here, there is risk of fluid (glycine) absorption while using monopolar energy. This risk is avoided by use of bipolar or laser energy with saline solution.
Hysteroscopic myomectomy is effective for control of bleeding, but failures are reported and are often related to growth of fibroids in other sites, association of fibroids with adenomyosis, and incomplete treatment of large intramural (partially submucous) myomas.
In terms of reproductive outcomes, most studies are retrospective. They report post-surgery pregnancy rates ranging from 16.7% to 76.9%, with a mean of 45% (. Their robustness could be criticized, but the authors of a recent review acknowledge that the benefits of hysteroscopic removal of submucous myomas for improving the chances of pregnancy ‘cannot be excluded’. In addition, one prospective randomized study has provided good-quality evidence that surgical therapy (hysteroscopic myomectomy) yields higher pregnancy rates than alternative treatments in women with submucous myomas.
Laparoscopic myomectomy
Laparoscopic myomectomy is perceived by many gynecological surgeons to be more difficult, but the advantages are real: less severe post-operative morbidity, faster recovery with laparoscopic procedures and no significant difference between reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic or abdominal myomectomy (by minilaparotomy). However, there have been reports of uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy, thus emphasizing the importance of adequate closure of the myometrial defect. In a review of nine trials including 808 patients, there was no evidence of any difference in recurrence risk between laparoscopy and open myomectomy.
Usually, a 10 mm scope and two or three ancillary ports are used, although some gynecologists prefer a 5-mm scope. Depending on the site of the myoma, either a vertical (longitudinal) or a transversal incision is made. In the majority of cases, a unipolar hook probe is utilized, but CO2 laser myomectomy is also performed in some departments. In certain cases, uterine artery ligation may be beneficial to reduce intraoperative bleeding. Robotic laparoscopic myomectomy has been evaluated in a few retrospective series but no prospective study has been published yet and considerable scepticism remains about the real advantages of the technique.
Leiomyomas are usually removed with a morcellator, although some gynecologists propose vaginal removal through the cul-de-sac of Douglas or minilaparotomy to avoid the risk of dispersing tissue fragments during sarcoma morcellation. The risk of uterine fragment dispersion with the subsequent appearance of pelvic adenomyotic masses and parasitic leiomyomas was described in 2006 and remains a concern. This complication can be avoided by extensive peritoneal lavage and careful removal of all the fragments, even if some authors still have misgivings. Indeed, since their first publication, Donnez et al. no longer encountered this complication in a subsequent series of 400 laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs), when caution was exercised and attention was paid to examine all areas of the abdominal cavity by placing the patient in the Trendelenburg and anti-Trendelenburg position and by extensive lavage. The risk of morcellation of uterine leiomyosarcomas has recently become a ‘hot’ topic, since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned about the use of electromechanical power morcellation. It should nevertheless be stressed that the prevalence of sarcoma in leiomyomas is <0.3% and the debate on the use of electric morcellation has probably been overstated, not only because of the fear of medicolegal issues but also due to emotional reasons. In a recent study, the prevalence of sarcoma was just 0.06% in a series of 10 731 uteri morcellated for myomas during LH. Of course, we should do all we can to improve the diagnosis of sarcoma, but a similar low incidence (1/2000) was observed in a very recent meta-analysis by and in a retrospective study including 4791 women in Norway. Another meta-analysis by concluded that leiomyosarcomas are diagnosed unexpectedly after surgery for what are presumed to be benign fibroids in 1 in 340 women, and that risks increase with age from less than one case per 500 women aged under 30 years to 1 in 98 women aged 75–79 years.
The technique of power morcellation in a bag was recently suggested to minimize the risk of inadvertent tissue spread, but there is no evidence that this technique will not increase the rate of post-operative complications.
Contraindications to laparoscopic myomectomy usually include the presence of an intramural myoma >10–12 cm in size or multiple myomas (≥4) in different sites of the uterus, requiring numerous incisions.
The dimensions and localization of the main myoma are the principal criteria for choosing the laparoscopic approach. Thus, depending on the skill of the surgeon and his/her ability to suture the myometrial defect without delay, either laparoscopy or minilaparotomy may be selected.
In terms of infertility, several non-controlled studies have suggested that myomectomy yields a decrease in the miscarriage rate in women with myomas distorting the uterine cavity.In a review of prospective and retrospective studies, Donnez and Jadoul reported a pooled pregnancy rate of 49% (95% CI 46–52) in patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy. In another review by ), the post-operative pregnancy rate was 57%. These post-myomectomy pregnancy rates have been confirmed by other studies, but the lack of randomized trials represents a serious drawback. However, it should be pointed out that there are no significant differences in cumulative pregnancy rates or obstetric or perinatal outcomes when laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy are compared.
Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Hysterectomy has long been considered standard surgical treatment for symptomatic intramural and submucous fibroids, particularly for women not wishing to conceive or those of premenopausal age (40–50 years). In the US, more than 600 000 hysterectomies are performed each year. In Denmark, the overall hysterectomy rate was around 180/100 000 women during the period 1977–2011.
Fibroids are the main indication for hysterectomy and, in the last decade, LH has become the ideal surgical approach to replace laparotomy. In some departments, the rate of LH exceeds 90%. Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) still remains indicated in some conditions, depending on the skill and habits of the surgeon.
Some studies have reported an increased risk of complications after LH, but in a very large series, ) found a similar complication rate after LH, VH and abdominal hysterectomy (0.44% of major complications). In a personal prospective series of 400 cases, no major complications were encountered. Of course, as stressed by the authors, uterine volume of ≥13–14 weeks represents a relative contraindication. A very recent study demonstrated that in some conditions, hospitalization for LH could be less than 5 h.
Some ‘in bag’ morcellation techniques, one of them called the Sydney technique, were developed to address the concerns of morcellating large myomatous uteri after total or subtotal hysterectomy but, as stressed earlier, no large studies have demonstrated any real benefit in terms of general safety. Moreover, the risk of leiomyosarcoma morcellation during LH must be weighed against procedure-related complications associated with laparotomy, including mortality.
Laparoscopic cryomyolysis and thermo-coagulation
Both laparoscopic cryomyolysis and thermo-coagulation have the same goal: reduction or suppression of the primary blood supply and induction of myoma shrinkage by causing sclerohyaline degeneration (by very low or very high temperatures).
For cryomyolysis, a cryoprobe is inserted into the myoma and cooled to a temperature of <90°C. For laparoscopic thermocoagulation, either a monopolar or bipolar probe is inserted into the myoma before delivering the electrical current. In some studies, laser fibers (YAG) have also been used. The limitation of all of these techniques is the lack of histological evaluation of the fibroids.
Laparoscopic occlusion of the uterine arteries
Laparoscopic occlusion of the uterine arteries appears to have no specific advantage over vaginal occlusion, as it requires a laparoscopic approach. Moreover, when compared to UAE, the outcomes were found to be inferior in terms of myoma size reduction and devascularization.
Alternatives to surgical intervention
The alternatives to surgical interventions are illustrated on the right-hand side of Fig. 4.
Uterine artery embolization
Although rapidly adopted by enthusiasts, the introduction of UAE has varied widely across the globe. This technique was first used in 1995 to treat uterine fibroids in women wishing to preserve their uterus.
UAE constitutes complete uterine therapy, as most fibroids are supplied by the uterine arteries. In UAE, percutaneous ablation of the fibromatous uterus is applied to induce ischemic necrosis of the fibroids, while the myometrium revascularizes. Most fibroids are targeted simultaneously. UAE has been shown, in randomized trials, to result in QoL similar to that achieved after surgery, but with a shorter hospital stay and earlier resumption of normal activities.
Although UAE is highly effective for treating symptoms (reduction in bleeding and fibroid size), the risk of reoperation is a reality: 15–20% after successful embolization and up to 50% in cases of incomplete infarction. Among possible complications, abdominal pain due to ischemic necrosis of fibroids and risk of infection should not be overlooked. The impact of UAE on the ovarian reserve is another concern, but a systematic review of 15 randomized trials and prospective cohort studies demonstrated that loss of ovarian function occurred primarily in women over 45 years of age. In a very recent review, clearly detailed the results and complications of UAE. It was emphasized that a desire for future pregnancy is a relative contraindication, as the lack of data in the literature cannot ensure a good pregnancy outcome. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing UAE and myomectomy, surgical removal had a more favorable outcome than UAE in terms of pregnancy rate (78% vs 50%), delivery rate (48% vs 19%), and abortion rate (23% vs 64%).
Gupta's article in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews evaluated seven RCTs comparing UAE and surgery (abdominal hysterectomy or myomectomy). The authors clearly stated that there were limitations in the evidence. The main limitations of the studies were a serious lack of precision due to wide confidence intervals, failure to clearly report methods, and the absence of blinding for subjective outcomes. They also estimated that between 15% and 32% of subjects would require further surgery within two years of UAE.
Several trials comparing UAE and myomectomy and UAE with focused ultrasound are currently ongoing, whose outcomes are awaited.
High-frequency magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery
High frequency magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) is thermal ablation using MRI to visualize the myoma and define the target. Ultrasonic energy is directed to a point inside the fibroid and coagulation tissue necrosis is induced in the myoma. In theory, damage to surrounding tissue is minimal but, in fact, the impact on critical neighboring structures cannot be excluded.
As stressed by in their review, hyperintensive MRI images are associated with reduced treatment success compared with hypointensive images of fibroids. The principal limitations to the use of MRgFUS are that (i) only a fraction of patients with fibroids meet the inclusion criteria, (ii) future fertility may be compromised and (iii) the financial burden may be too heavy.
The literature is still scarce on this topic and additional studies are needed to evaluate safety profiles. In a recent study, 30% of women underwent further fibroid surgery or procedures two years after MRgFUS. Screening and MRI-based prediction models for assessing therapeutic responses may reduce the risk of treatment failure. Several non-controlled clinical trials have reported pregnancies after MRgFUS, but a recent review by found a high rate of complications in the 34 documented pregnancies.
Vaginal occlusion of the uterine arteries
Occlusion of the uterine arteries with a clamp-like device that remains in place for 6 h leads to myoma ischemia by interfering with the blood supply to the uterus. However, this technique is not recommended for women wishing to conceive in the future.
In a study by, dominant fibroid volume decreased by 24% and heavy bleeding symptoms decreased by 51%. Here too, research with larger populations is needed to prove the efficacy of the technique.
Why we need new options
Fibroids are highly prevalent and represent a high health burden. Indeed, about 30% of women with leiomyomas will request treatment due to morbidities such as heavy menstrual bleeding, abdominal pain, pressure symptoms and/or infertility. Current treatments are mainly surgical and expensive. Among 600 000 hysterectomies performed each year in the USA, 200 000 are for fibroids. In a study by, health care costs for the management of leiomyomas were estimated to be over $2 billion per year. There is no doubt that fibroids have a significant economic impact, but the cost of therapy both to the health care system and women with fibroids must be balanced against the cost of untreated disease conditions, as well as the cost of ongoing or repeated investigations and treatment modalities. Despite the lack of relevant medico-economic evaluations of the different therapeutics, it is likely that reducing the number of hysterectomies and other surgical procedures will reduce costs and morbidity. It is therefore necessary to develop and evaluate alternatives to surgical procedures especially when fertility preservation is the goal.
Current medical therapy
Two recent Cochrane Reviews on the use of herbal preparations and aromatase inhibitors concluded that there was no evidence to support the use of herbal preparations or aromatase inhibitors as medical therapy for treating myomas. However, as reviewed by, ), there is evidence to suggest that certain dietary or alternative treatments like phytochemical herbal preparations may be effective. In addition, some synthetic and natural compounds as well as growth factors are now under laboratory investigation, while observational data suggest that increased consumption of fruits, vegetables and low-fat dietary products are associated with a reduced risk of developing fibroids. Nevertheless, some uncertainty remains due to insufficient high-quality studies with large enough sample sizes.
GnRH agonists
By inducing a state of hypoestrogenism and temporary menopause with amenorrhea, GnRH agonists have been used to shrink fibroids and restore hemoglobin levels in symptomatic women (Fig. 5). They cannot be used for long periods of time because of their side effects, such as hot flushes and bone loss. A very recent review demonstrated that there is modest evidence that add-back therapy (tibolone, raloxifene, estriol and ipriflavone) can help reduce bone loss and that medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and tibolone may moderate vasomotor symptoms.
Use of GnRH agonist before surgery is still a matter of debate, but a review by Gutmann and Corson reports that ‘preoperative use of GnRH agonist appears to be relevant and beneficial in patients with submucous fibroids’. Benefits include a resolution of preoperative anemia; a decrease in fibroid size; a reduction of endometrial thickness and vascularization with subsequently improved visibility and reduced fluid absorption and the possibility of surgical scheduling. Conversely, this preoperative treatment is associated with post-injection endometrial bleeding due to the flare-up effect.
Evidence of the crucial role of progesterone pathways in the pathophysiology of uterine fibroids by use of selective progesterone receptor modulators
To date, genetic and epigenetic factors, sex steroids, growth factors, cytokines, chemokines and ECM components have been identified as being implicated in the pathogenesis of leiomyomas. Many growth factors and also activin and myostatin play a role in the mechanisms involved in the development of leiomyomas. Of course, estrogen and progesterone and their respective receptors also have a very significant impact on leiomyoma growth. Recently, demonstrated that testosterone was additionally implicated in the growth of uterine fibroids. In vitro studies have also shown that fibroid development depends on miRNA regulation of gene targets which impact cellular processes. The initial event that triggers the first stages of tumorigenesis nevertheless involves somatic mutations.
In the past, estrogen was considered to be the major growth factor in myoma development. However, already in the 1990s, a number of studies reported increased the expression of both progesterone receptor A (PR-A) and progesterone receptor B (PR-B) in leiomyoma tissue compared with adjacent normal myometrium. Very recently, Tsigkou et al. showed that PR-B mRNA and PR-A and PR-B proteins were more concentrated in leiomyomas than in matched myometrium. Levels of PR-B mRNA in leiomyoma tissue were directly associated with the number of myomas, but inversely correlated with the intensity of symptoms. Moreover, higher proliferative activity, demonstrated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the mitotic index, was observed in leiomyomas during the luteal (secretory) phase. There is evidence from preclinical and clinical trials, as well as from histological and pharmacological studies, that progesterone and its receptors play a key role in uterine fibroid growth. In a review, described, in detail, the activation of signaling pathways in leiomyomas by both estrogen and progesterone. Progesterone is able to cause rapid, membrane-initiated effects, independent of gene transcription, that alter the production of second messengers involved in cell signaling transduction pathways. The PI3K/AKT pathway is mediated by progesterone which, through its receptors, can quickly activate this pathway, which is increasingly considered to be a potential promoter of leiomyoma growth. PTEN, on the other hand, should be considered as a negative regulator of AKT. Progesterone and growth factor signaling pathways are interconnected and govern numerous physiological processes such as proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation.
Progesterone can modulate the expression of growth factor signaling proteins and is implicated in the regulation of genes associated with proliferation and apoptosis, but these genes have not yet been fully identified or studied in detail. There is therefore evidence that progesterone plays a crucial role, but the mechanism by which it promotes proliferation, the repertoire of genes involved, and how it crosstalks with growth factor signaling pathways all need to be investigated in greater depth. The recent discovery of stem cells and their paracrine interactions with more differentiated cell populations within leiomyoma tissue may lead to the development of therapeutics that temper leiomyoma growth as well as those that eradicate them.
Having established the crucial role of progesterone in the growth and development of myomas, we can modulate the progesterone pathway by use of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs). SPRMs are synthetic compounds that exert either an agonistic or antagonistic effect on PRs (Fig. 5). Their binding allows these receptors to interact with coactivators and/or corepressors, and this is further impacted by the presence of coregulators in a particular cell type, which will dictate whether an SPRM acts more as an agonist or antagonist. Hence, the mechanism of action of SPRMs on PRs depends on their structure and how they alter the PR conformation, resulting in exposure or inactivation of particular binding domains. Their activity is also mitigated by tissue types and physiological contexts.
SPRMs and fibroids: what we know so far
Four members of the family of compound SPRMs have been investigated in phase II clinical trials: mifepristone, asoprisnil, ulipristal acetate (UPA) and telapristone acetate. All were shown to decrease leiomyoma size and reduce uterine bleeding in a dose-dependent manner. However, although three studies showed a myoma volume reduction of ±30%, a review of the literature by (Cochrane Review) found no clear evidence of this. Some follow-up studies have also raised concerns about unopposed estrogenic activity and liver toxicity.
The latest antiprogestin to be studied in large clinical trials, UPA, has shown promising results in terms of efficiency and safety. UPA was compared to a placebo and to leuprolide acetate (a GnRH agonist) in two randomized trials. In these first clinical studies, uterine bleeding was controlled in more than 90% of patients receiving a three-month course of UPA, and the median times to control bleeding were shorter in the UPA group (5–7 days) than in the GnRH agonist group (21 days). The control of bleeding and subsequent correction of anemia were clinically relevant. Indeed, it has been well documented that preoperative anemia, even to a mild degree, is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery. UPA was also found to have a sustained effect (up to six months) in women who did not undergo surgery after the three-month study period. By contrast, those treated with GnRH agonist experienced rapid regrowth of their fibroids, whose size reached pre-therapy dimensions by six months post-treatment.
Importantly, the induced effects of SPRMs on the endometrium, now described as progesterone receptor modulator (PRM)-associated endometrial changes (PAECs) (Fig. 5), present in almost 70% of patients at the end of treatment, have proved to be benign and reversible, as they disappeared two months after the end of therapy. Safety has also been well documented in pharmacokinetic studies following multiple doses.
The mechanism of action by which SPRMs reduce menstrual blood loss in women with fibroids remains unknown, although a number of possible factors have been proposed by, ). reported that uterine NK cells regulate endometrial bleeding and were suppressed by asoprisnil.
Long-term intermittent administration of SPRMs, opening up new treatment perspectives
Because of the sustained effect observed in the first two trials,), additional intermittent (12-week) courses of SPRMs with off-treatment intervals may be an alternative for long-term medical management of fibroids. The results of the first long-term intermittent administration study suggested that more than one course of SPRMs can maximize its potential benefits in terms of bleeding control and fibroid volume reduction.
The latest clinical trial was initiated to investigate the efficacy and safety of four repeated 12-week courses of either 5 or 10 mg UPA daily for intermittent treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. This study demonstrated a similar degree of response in both treatment groups. We will therefore focus on the results in terms of efficacy and safety of this trial using the approved dose of 5 mg UPA in a repeated intermittent therapy setting (four courses). The percentages of subjects identified as being in amenorrhea after individual treatment courses (1, 2, 3 and 4 in the study) were 75.8%, 84.1%, 86.4% and 87.5% in the 5 mg group. The pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) score was measured at initial screening and after 1, 2 and 4 courses to assess the level of menstrual bleeding during the off-treatment period. In the 5 mg group, (median) levels at screening were 224.0, dropping significantly with each subsequent course and finally reaching 77.5 after course 4. The percentage of subjects with a clinically significant volume reduction of ≥25% increased from course 1 to course 4 (from 62.3% to 78.1%), and those with a volume reduction of ≥50% also increased from course 1 to course 4, proving that repeated courses considerably maximize the impact of treatment. This was also proved by the volume reduction of the three largest fibroids which was increased from course 1 to course 4 (Fig. 6). The findings of this study therefore demonstrate the efficacy of 5 mg UPA treatment and further confirm the safety of repeated intermittent administration of UPA for symptomatic myomas.
The safety profile of UPA during multiple treatment courses was well documented in this study. Safety assessments, including vital signs, physical examinations and laboratory analyses, as well as reported adverse events (AEs) both on and off treatment, showed repeated intermittent administration of UPA to be well tolerated. The vast majority of AEs (97.6%) were of mild or moderate severity. Headaches and hot flushes were the most frequently reported AEs (less than 11% of subjects in any treatment course), but the frequency of these events decreased with each additional treatment course. Breast pain or discomfort was observed in 3% of subjects. In this series of 451 women, serious AEs related to medication included five cases of menorrhagia, one bipolar disorder, one spontaneous myoma expulsion, one abdominal pain and one back pain. No safety concerns were identified from physical examination, vital signs, ovarian ultrasound or electrocardiogram (ECG).
Based on the available data related to endometrial safety after up to four treatment courses, no increased occurrence of more serious conditions of the endometrium, such as hyperplasia with atypia or endometrial carcinoma, was noted. The frequency of SPRM-associated non-physiological endometrial changes (PAEC) did not appear to increase with repeated treatment courses, reaching 13.3% after a fourth treatment course, and returning to pretreatment levels within three months of completion of treatment. These data further confirm the rapid reversibility of PAEC following completion of treatment and subsequent menstruation. It is reassuring that median endometrial thickness (7–8 mm) was similar to screening levels after single and multiple treatment courses and remained stable during post-treatment follow-up (three months after treatment cessation).
A recent study by Courtoy et al. suggested an important role of UPA in collagen degradation induced by matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), offering an explanation for the sustained beneficial effect. Indeed, this study strongly points to multifactorial mechanisms of action involving: (1) a persistently low cell death rate; (2) a limited period of cell death and (3) ECM remodeling concomitant with stimulation of MMP-2 expression.
An in vitro study demonstrated another possible mechanism of action of UPA: inhibition of activin A expression and function in cultured leiomyoma cells.
Novel approaches and algorithms, with a special emphasis on infertility
There is a clear need for alternatives to surgery, even the less invasive endoscopic techniques, especially when fertility preservation is the goal. There is no doubt that surgery remains indicated in some instances, but we must now establish whether SPRMs (UPA) allow less invasive surgery or even complete avoidance of surgery. On the other hand, it is clear that long-term intermittent use of UPA will change our approach to the management of uterine fibroids.
To address the question of which therapy to adopt, it is crucial to consider key factors determining the management of uterine fibroids: patient age, severity of symptoms (pain, bleeding and infertility), wish to preserve the uterus and/or fertility, localization of fibroids according to FIGO classification and myoma volume. The approaches described below are according to the FIGO classification.
Type 0 myomas
If type 0 myomas are present, cutting the pedicle by hysteroscopy is indicated (Fig. 7).
Type 1 myomas
In the majority of cases, hysteroscopic myomectomy for type 1 myomas is relatively straightforward for experienced surgeons, especially in case of type 1 myomas less than 3 cm in size (Fig. 8). If a fibroid is of type 1 but larger than 3 cm, or if the patient presents with anemia, pre-hysteroscopic medical therapy (SPRMs or GnRH agonist) is indicated. Results in terms of subsequent fertility after hysteroscopic myomectomy were discussed earlier in this paper.
Medical therapy may be given in one or two courses of three months. In the vast majority of cases, type 1 myomas respond to this preoperative therapy and regress in size, enabling an easier hysteroscopic approach in better conditions (recovery of hemoglobin). It should be pointed out that in some cases, myomas regress so much that surgery may be avoided.
Young infertile women of reproductive age and wishing to conceive
In case of type 2 myomas, medical therapy (SPRMs) can be proposed (Fig. 9). Myomas often respond to this preoperative therapy and regress in size. This reduction also allows a hysteroscopic approach that can be planned after the first menstrual bleed. In some cases (if myomas regress so much that they no longer distort the uterine cavity), surgery may not be required. If myomas are multiple (≥2) or of different types (type 2–5), as is frequently observed, medical therapy (SPRMs) can be given in two courses of three months, as described in clinical trials with UPA. After these two courses of three months, there are three possible outcomes.
The most positive outcome would be that myoma regression is very significant (>50% decrease in volume). The uterine cavity is no longer distorted and the patient can try to conceive naturally or undergo assisted reproductive techniques, if indicated. A first series of pregnancies after UPA treatment was recently described, demonstrating that in some cases, surgical treatment is not required and patients can conceive and deliver healthy offspring (Fig. 10). Other case reports have also been published. In our series of pregnancies, patients were able to have unprotected sexual intercours or to start with ovarian stimulation after the second menstrual bleed. For those having to undergo IVF, a vaginal ultrasound was performed on day 3 of the second menstrual bleed to assess the absence of a thick endometrium. The second outcome would be that myoma regression is significant (≥25% but <50%). However, in some instances, if the uterine cavity remains distorted or if the myoma remains large due to great volume at baseline, the indication for surgery stands. In this case, medical treatment may allow surgery to be performed by a laparoscopic approach once the hemoglobin level is normalized, avoiding laparotomy.
The least outcome would be that the response to medical therapy is inadequate. In this case, surgery remains indicated.
Young women of reproductive age with symptomatic myomas and wishing to preserve their fertility but having no immediate desire for pregnancy
In these cases too, medical therapy can be proposed (Fig. 9), taking into account recent clinical trials with SPRMs demonstrating that four courses of three months induce a significant improvement, course upon course (decrease in myoma size and PBAC score). In the vast majority of cases, regression of myoma size (≥25% in 80% of patients) and control of bleeding (in >90% of patients) will allow avoidance of surgery and restoration of hemoglobin levels (Fig. 11).
When there is no immediate wish to conceive, there is no pressing need for surgery (even if the uterine cavity remains distorted and/or large myomas are still present). In some cases, myomas will all but disappear. In case of symptom recurrence, medical therapy may be reinitiated. Myomectomy should only be considered when the patient wishes to become pregnant, and if really necessary according to the localization and volume of the fibroids still present. This is important to take into account, especially for women of African descent. Indeed, African and African-American women have a greater chance of developing symptomatic myomas at an earlier age than Caucasian women. It is widely known that the rate of recurrence of myomas after myomectomy can reach almost 60% after an interval of 4–5 years, and that the risk of pelvic adhesions is significantly increased after a repeated myomectomy. Medical treatment with SPRMs can thus be beneficial, since long-term intermittent therapy (repeated in case of symptom recurrence during the interval) may help to avoid or at least postpone the need for surgery until the patient wishes to conceive (Fig. 11).
Surgery therefore remains indicated only when the patient wishes to conceive, and if large myomas (>3–4 cm) distorting the uterine cavity are present, as these could be the cause of her infertility.
Asymptomatic women with myomas and undergoing IVF or oocyte donation
A meta-analysis by evaluating 23 studies showed a significant drop in pregnancy and implantation rates in the presence of myomas, especially submucous and/or intramural myomas distorting the uterine cavity. In another meta-analysis, demonstrated their impact on fertility, even in case of intramural myomas not distorting the uterine cavity. A recent study by confirmed that intramural fibroids >2.85 cm in size significantly decreased the delivery rate of patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Moreover, some centers have large cohorts of patients of more than 40 years of age in oocyte donation programs. In this group of women, the prevalence of myomas is higher than in women of 30 years of age.
It could be proposed that patients with myomas be treated with one or two courses of SPRMs before IVF or oocyte donation, in order to reduce the size of myomas and restore the uterine cavity and subsequently improve implantation rates. Clinical trials evaluating UPA before IVF or oocyte donation should be initiated to investigate this further.
Premenopausal women presenting with symptomatic myomas and with no desire for pregnancy but a wish to keep their uterus
Isolated type 2 fibroids are relatively rare in premenopausal women. In the majority of cases, patients with symptomatic myomas have an enlarged uterus with multiple myomas or large myomas of type 2–5 (Fig. 12).
Our latest results led us to slightly modify previously published algorithms for this group of women. Indeed, in subjects treated with 5 mg UPA for four courses of three months, the percentage of patients with a clinically significant volume reduction increased from 62.3% after 1 course to 78.1% after 4 courses, suggesting increased benefits with repeated courses. The percentage of women showing a clinically significant reduction of >50% also increased from course 1 (37.2%) to course 4 (63.8%). Moreover, the median PBAC score during the off-treatment period decreased with each subsequent course.
In case of a good response (characterized by a clinically significant volume reduction and/or control of bleeding), treatment can be stopped after four courses and the patient is re-evaluated. Repeated therapy may be proposed when the symptoms recur, as no endometrial hyperplasia was diagnosed in subjects who took 5 mg UPA for eight courses of three months. In this context, the goal is to reach menopause without the need for surgery. Data indicating that SPRMs exert an anti-proliferative effect in breast tissue are also reassuring. Some studies reported anti-proliferative effects on the endometrium after SPRM courses of up to six months.
Uterine fibroid associated pathologies
Endometriosis and adenomyosis are frequently associated with uterine fibroids.
Endometriosis
In theory, induction of amenorrhea in women treated with SPRMs should also relieve endometriosis-associated pain. In mammalian models, SPRMs stop prostaglandin production by endometriotic lesions and this direct effect may also serve to reduce pain.
Nevertheless, it should be stressed that even if endometriosis and uterine fibroids are both estrogen-dependent diseases, they show a completely different response to progesterone: endometriosis is characterized by progesterone resistance, while fibroids grow under the influence of progesterone. Fig. 13 shows the excellent response (>50% volume reduction) to UPA obtained in fibroids, but the absence of response (or even a slight volume increase) in endometriomas.
The specific effects of SPRMs have yet to be determined in ectopic endometrium. Indeed, PAECs may be present in lesions, as observed in eutopic endometrium.
Adenomyosis
Adenomyomas and adenomyosis are two distinct clinical entities. Adenomyomas may respond very well to SPRMs, but severe full-thickness adenomyosis, characterized by the presence of numerous sites of ectopic endometrium in the myometrium of an enlarged uterus, is a specific entity that might have a completely different response.
SPRMs will probably be effective in reducing adenomyosis-associated pain by inducing amenorrhea, but are unlikely to be able to significantly reduce the size of the uterus. Clinical trials are ongoing to explore this particular context and the impact of endometrial modifications, as PAECs will also be present in ectopic intramyometrial endometrium.
Future prospectives for medical therapy
SPRMs have opened up new avenues to explore in fibroid medical therapy, to both treat symptoms and postpone or to eliminate the need for surgery. Future clinical trials should focus on prevention strategies, such as preventing occurrence in women genetically predisposed to this condition, and avoiding recurrence after surgery in women at high risk (i.e. those of a young age or with a family history) (Fig. 14).
Conclusion
Symptomatic uterine fibroids require surgical and/or medical therapy according to the severity of symptoms, age, infertility, wish to preserve the uterus and FIGO classification (Fig. 14). Current strategies involve mainly surgical intervention, such as hysterectomy, myomectomy by hysteroscopy and myomectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy. Hysterectomy provides the most effective treatment for fibroids, but is not appropriate in many cases. The choice between less invasive techniques (uterine-sparing options such as myomectomy) is guided by the size, number and location of fibroids as well as the personal experience of the gynecologist and available equipment. Other surgical techniques, such as laparoscopic cryomyolysis, thermocoagulation or uterine artery occlusion, are rarely used. Non-surgical interventions, such as UAE and MRgFUS, are also available but the desire for future pregnancy is a relative contraindication.
On the other hand, the need for medical therapy remains a reality. It is indeed essential that new treatments be developed to be able to offer as there is a pressing need for alternatives to surgical intervention, particularly when fertility preservation is the goal.
GnRH agonists have been used to shrink fibroids and restore hemoglobin levels in symptomatic women, but because of their side effects, they cannot be used for long periods of time. However, there is now growing evidence of the crucial role of progesterone in pathways in the pathophysiology of uterine fibroids by the use of SPRMs. UPA (one member of the SPRM compound family) has been studied in large clinical trials and its long-term intermittent administration has been evaluated, yielding promising results for new treatment perspectives. It was found that more than one three-month course of UPA maximizes its potential benefits in terms of bleeding control and fibroid volume reduction. Hence, depending on age and symptoms (infertility, bleeding, etc.), SPRMs should be considered an alternative to surgical therapy, or at least an adjunct to surgery, in some circumstances, as illustrated in the algorithms.
In conclusion, asymptomatic fibroids do not require treatment once the diagnosis is confirmed by ultrasonography or MRI. Women should be made aware of all available treatment options (medical, radiological and surgical) and why they may or may not be appropriate. Gynecologists now have new tools in their armamentarium (Fig. 15) opening up novel strategies for the management of uterine fibroids.
References 212
- 1.
Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015; 8:CD003677.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub5
- 2.
Alborzi S, Ghannadan E, Alborzi S, Alborzi M. A comparison of combined laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy in treatment of symptomatic myoma. Fertil Steril2009;92:742–747.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.011
- 3.
Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Ferrero S, Ragni N. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2006;13:92–97.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.008
- 4.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG practice bulletin: alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol2008;112:387–400.
Not in our library10.1097/aog.0b013e318183fbab
- 5.
Andreotti RF, Fleischer AC. Practical applications of 3D sonography in gynecologic imaging. Radiol Clin North Am.2014;52:1201–1213.
Not in our library10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.001
- 6.
Bae JH, Chong GO, Seong WJ, Hong DG, Lee YS. Benefit of uterine artery ligation in laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril2011;95:775–778.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1079
- 7.
Bagaria M, Suneja A, Vaid NB, Guleria K, Mishra K. Low–dose mifepristone in treatment of uterine leiomyoma: a randomised double–blind placebo–controlled clinical trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol2009;49:77–83.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1479-828x.2008.00931.x
- 8.
Baird DD, Dunson DB. Why is parity protective for uterine fibroids. Epidemiology. 2003;14:247–250.
Not in our library10.1097/01.ede.0000054360.61254.27
- 9.
Baird D, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative invidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol2003;188:100–107.
Not in our library10.1067/mob.2003.99
- 10.
Barlow DH, Lumsden MA, Fauser BC, Terrill P, Bestel E. Individualized vaginal bleeding experience of women with uterine fibroids in the PEARL I randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of ulipristal acetate or placebo. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:480–489.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/det467
- 11.
Berman JM, Bolnick JM, Pemueller RR, Garza Leal JG Reproductive outcomes in women following radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of symptomatic fibroids. A retrospective case series analysis. J Reprod Med2015;60:194e8.
Not in our library
- 12.
Bernardi TS,Radosa MP, Weisheit A, Diebolder H, Schneider U, Schleussner E, Runnebaum IB Laparoscopic myomectomy: a 6-year follow-up single-center cohort analysis of fertility and obstetric outcome measures. Arch Gynecol Obstet2014;290:87e91.
Not in our library10.1007/s00404-014-3155-2
- 13.
Bestel E, Donnez J. The potential of selective progesterone receptor modulators for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab2014;9:79–92.
Not in our library10.1586/17446651.2014.862495
- 14.
Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Nappi L, Di Venere R, Masciopinto V, Pansini V, Pinto L, Santoro A, Cormio G. Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc2004;11:59–61.
Not in our library10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60012-6
- 15.
Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L. What does ‘diagnostic hysteroscopy’ mean today? The role of the new techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol2003;15:303–308.
Not in our library10.1097/01.gco.0000084241.09900.c8
- 16.
Bhave Chittawar P, Franik S, Pouwer AW, Farquhar C. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014;10:CD004638.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd004638.pub3
- 17.
Blitz MJ, Rochelson B, Augustine S, Greenberg M, Sison CP, Vohra N. Uterine fibroids at routine second-trimester ultrasound survey and risk of sonographic short cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med2016;14:1–7.
Not in our library10.3109/14767058.2015.1131261
- 18.
Bojahr B, De Wilde RL, Tchartchian G. Malignancy rate of 10,731 uteri morcellated during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH). Arch Gynecol Obstet2015;292:665–672.
Not in our library10.1007/s00404-015-3696-z
- 19.
Bosteels J, Weyers S, Kasius J, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, D'Hooghe TM. Anti-adhesion therapy following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of female subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015;11:CD011110.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd011110.pub2
- 20.
Bosteels J, Weyers S, Mathieu C, Mol BW, D'Hooghe T. The effectiveness of reproductive surgery in the treatment of female infertility: facts, views and vision. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010 a;2:232–252. Review
Not in our library
- 21.
Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P, Panayotidis C, Van Herendael B, Gomel V, Mol BW, Mathieu C, D'Hooghe T. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update2010 b;16:1–11.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmp033
- 22.
Bouchard P. Selective progesterone receptor modulators: a class with multiple actions and applications in reproductive endocrinology, and gynecology. Gynecol Endocrinol.2014;30:683–684.
Not in our library10.3109/09513590.2014.950647
- 23.
Bouchard P, Chabbert-Buffet N, Fauser BC Selective progesterone receptor modulators in reproductive medicine; pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety. Fertil Steril2011;96:1175–1189.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.021
- 24.
Brohl AS, Li L, Andikyan V, Običan SG, Cioffi A, Hao K, Dudley JT, Ascher-Walsh C, Kasarskis A, Maki RG. Age-stratified risk of unexpected uterine sarcoma following surgery for presumed benign leiomyoma. Oncologist2015;20:433–439.
Not in our library10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0361
- 25.
Bulun S. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med2009;360:268–279.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmra0804690
- 26.
Bulun S. Uterine Fibroids. N Engl J Med2013; 369:14.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmra1209993
- 27.
Carbonnel M, Goetgheluck J, Frati A, Even M, Ayoubi JM. Robot-assisted laparoscopy for infertility treatment: current views. Fertil Steril2014;101:621–626.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.020
- 28.
Cardozo ER, Clark AD, Banks NK, Henne MB, Stegmann BJ, Segars JH. The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol2012;206:211.e1–9.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.002
- 29.
Carr BR, Marshburn PB, Weatherall PT, Bradshaw KD, Breslau NA, Byrd W, Roark M, Steinkampf MP. An evaluation of the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and medroxyprogesterone acetate on uterine leiomyomata volume by magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab1993;76:1217–1223.
Not in our library10.1210/jcem.76.5.8496313
- 30.
Casadio P, Youssef AM, Spagnolo E, Rizzo MA, Talamo MR, De Angelis D, Marra E, Ghi T, Savelli L, Farina A, et al Should the myometrial free margin still be considered a limiting factor for hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids? A possible answer to an old question. Fertil Steril2011;95:1764–1768.e1.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.033
- 31.
Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, Unfer V. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecol Endocrinol2006;22:106–109.
Not in our library10.1080/09513590600604673
- 32.
Chabbert-Buffet N, Ebser N, Bouchard P, Fibroid growth and medical options for treatment. Fertil Steril2014;102:630–639.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1238
- 33.
Chabbert-Buffet N, Meduri G, Bouchard P, Spitz IM. Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Hum Reprod Update2005;11:293–307.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmi002
- 34.
Chabbert-Buffet N, Pintiaux A, Bouchard P The immninent dawn of SPRMs in obstetrics and gynecology. Mol Cell Endocrinol2012;02:21.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mce.2012.02.021
- 35.
Cholkeri-Singh A, Miller CE. Power morcellation in a specimen bag. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:160.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.012
- 36.
Ciarmela P, Bloise E, Gray PC, Carrarelli P, Islam MS, De Pascalis F, Severi FM, Vale W, Castellucci M, Petraglia F. Activin-A and myostatin response and steroid regulation in human myometrium: disruption of their signalling in uterine fibroid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2011 a;96:755–765.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2010-0501
- 37.
Ciarmela P, Carrarelli P, Islam MS, Janjusevic M, Zupi E, Tosti C, Castellucci M, Petraglia F. Ulipristal acetate modulates the expression and functions of activin a in leiomyoma cells. Reprod Sci.2014;21:1120–1125.
Not in our library10.1177/1933719114542019
- 38.
Ciarmela P, Islam MS, Reis FM, Gray PC, Bloise E, Petraglia F, Vale W, Castellucci M. Growth factors and myometrium: biological effects in uterine fibroid and possible clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update2011 b;17:772–790.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmr031
- 39.
Clark NA, Mumford SL, Segars JH. Reproductive impact of MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for fibroids: a systematic review of the evidence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol2014;26:151–161.
Not in our library10.1097/gco.0000000000000070
- 40.
Cobo A, Garrido N, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Six years’ experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate. Fertil Steril2015;104:1426–1434.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.020
- 41.
Courtoy G, Donnez J, Marbaix E, Dolmans MM. In vivo mechanisms of uterine myoma volume reduction with ulipristal acetate treatmen. Fertil Steril2015; 104:426–434.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.025
- 42.
Davis BJ, Risinger JI, Chandramouli GV, Bushel PR, Baird DD, Peddada SD Gene expression in uterine leiomyoma from tumors likely to be growing (from black women over 35) and tumors likely to be non-growing (from white women over 35). PLoS One2013;8:e63909.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0063909
- 43.
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bettocchi S, Spinelli M, Guida M, Nappi L, Angioni S, Sosa Fernandez LM, Nappi C. Review of new office-based hysteroscopic procedures 2003–2009. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2010;17:436–448.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.014
- 44.
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Calagna G, Di Carlo C, Guida M, Perino A,Nappi C. Cold loops applied to bipolar resectoscope: A safe ‘one-step’ myomectomy for treatment of submucosal myomas with intramural development. J Obstet Gynaecol Res2015;41:1935–1941.
Not in our library10.1111/jog.12831
- 45.
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Mazzon I, Bramante S, Bettocchi S, Bifulco G, Guida M, Nappi C. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques. Hum Reprod Update2008;14:101–119.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmm041
- 46.
Doherty L, Mutlu L, Sinclair D, Taylor H. Uterine fibroids: clinical manifestations and contemporary management. Reprod Sci2014;21:1067–1092.
Not in our library10.1177/1933719114533728
- 47.
Donnez J, Arriagada P, Donnez O, Dolmans MM. Current management of myomas: the place of medical therapy with the advent of selective progesterone receptor modulators. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol2015 b;27:422–431.
Not in our library10.1097/gco.0000000000000229
- 48.
Donnez O, Donnez J. A series of 400 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease: a single centre, single surgeon prospective study of complications confirming previous retrospective study. BJOG2010;117:752–755.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02520.x
- 49.
Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM With the advent of selective progesterone receptor modulators, what is the place of myoma surgery in current practice. Fertil Steril2014 a;102:640–648.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.041
- 50.
Donnez O, Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Dethy A, Baeyens M, Mitchell J. Low Pain Score After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Same-Day Discharge Within Less Than 5 Hours: Results of a Prospective Observational Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2015 c;22:1293–1299.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2015.06.021
- 51.
Donnez J, Donnez O, Matule D, Ahrendt HJ, Hudecek R, Zatik J, Kasilovskiene Z,Dumitrascu MC, Fernandez H, Barlow DH, et al Long–term medical management of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate. Fertil Steril2016;105:165–173.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.032
- 52.
Donnez J, Gillerot S, Bourgonjon D, Clerckx F, Nisolle M. Neodymium: YAG laser hysteroscopy in large submucous fibroids. Fertil Steril1990;54:999–1003.
Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53994-6
- 53.
Donnez J, Hudecek R, Donnez O, Matule D, Arhendt HJ, Zatik J, Kasilovskiene Z, Dumitrascu MC, Fernandez H, Barlow DH, et al Efficacy and Safety of repeated use of ulipristal acetate in uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril2015 a;103:519–527
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.038
- 54.
Donnez J, Jadoul P What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate. Hum Reprod2002;17:1424–1430.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/17.6.1424
- 55.
Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. Iatrogenic peritoneal adenomyoma after laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy and uterine morcellation. Fertil Steril2006;86:1511–1512.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.009
- 56.
Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. BJOG2009;116:492–500.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01966.x
- 57.
Donnez J, Nisolle M, Smoes P, Gillet N, Beguin S, Casanas-Roux F. Peritoneal endometriosis and ‘endometriotic’ nodules of the rectovaginal septum are two different entities. Fertil Steril1996;66:362–368.
Not in our library
- 58.
Donnez J, Schrurs B, Gillerot S, Sandow J, Clerckx F. Treatment of uterine fibroids with implants of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist: assessment by hysterography. Fertil Steril1989;51:947–950.
Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60723-9
- 59.
Donnez O, Squifflet J, Leconte I, Jadoul P, Donnez J. Posthysterectomy pelvic adenomyotic masses observed in 8 cases out of a series of 1405 laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2007;14:156–160.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2006.09.008
- 60.
Donnez J, Squifflet J, Polet R, Nisolle M. Laparoscopic myolysis. Hum Reprod Update2000;6:609–613.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/6.6.609
- 61.
Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P, Puscasiu L, Zakharenko NF, Ivanova T, Ugocsai G, Mara M, Jilla MP, Bestel E, et al Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl j Med2012 a;366:409–420.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1103182
- 62.
Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vázquez F, Bouchard P, Lemieszczuk B, Baró F, Nouri K, Selvaggi L, Sodowski K, Bestel E, et al Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med.2012 b;366:421–432.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1103180
- 63.
Donnez J, Vázquez F, Tomaszewski J, Nouri K, Bouchard P, Fauser BC, Barlow DH, Palacios S, Donnez O, Bestel E, et al Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate. Fertil Steril2014 b;101:1565–1573.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.008
- 64.
Drayer SM, Catherino WH. Prevalence, morbidity, and current medical management of uterine leiomyomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2015;131:117–122.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.051
- 65.
Dubuisson JB, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K, Chapron C. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view. Hum Reprod Update2000;6:588–594.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/6.6.588
- 66.
Eggert SL, Huyck KL, Somasundaram P, Kavalla R, Stewart EA, Lu AT, Painter JN, Montgomery GW, Medland SE, Nyholt DR, et al Genome-wide linkage and association analyses implicate FASN in predisposition to uterine leiomyomata. Am J Hum Genet2012;91:621–628.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.009
- 67.
Elger W, Ivell R, Nandy A, Rasch A, Triller A, Chwalisz K. Modulation of uterine prostaglandin secretion by the selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) asoprisnil, progestins, and antiprogestins in cycling and ovariectomized guinea pig. Fertil Steril2004;82:S316.
Not in our library
- 68.
Eltoukhi HM, Modi MN, Weston M, Armstrong AY, Stewart EA. The health disparities of uterine fibroid tumors for African American women: a public health issue. Am J Obstet Gynecol2014;210:194–198.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.008
- 69.
Englund K, Blanck A, Gustavsson I, Lundkvist Y, Sjoblom P, Norgren A, Lindblom B. Sex steroid receptors in human myometrium and fibroids: changes during the menstrual cycle and gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment. J Clin endocrinol Metabol1998;83:4092–4096.
Not in our library10.1210/jcem.83.11.5287
- 70.
Engman M, Granberg S, Williams AR, Meng CX, Lalitkumar PG, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Mifepristone for treatment of uterine leiomyoma. A prospective randomized placebo controlled trial. Hum Reprod2009;24:1870–1879.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dep100
- 71.
Engman M, Skoog L, Soderqvist G, Gemzell-Danielsson K. The effect of mifepristone on breast cell proliferation in premenopausal women evaluated through fine needle aspiration cytology. Hum. Reprod2008;23:2072–2079.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/den228
- 72.
Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Marconi D, Romanini ME, Szabolcs B, Piredda A, Arduini D. Ultrasound-assisted laparoscopic cryomyolysis: two- and three-dimensional findings before, during and after treatment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2005;25:393–400.
Not in our library10.1002/uog.1861
- 73.
Fiscella K, Eisinger SH, Meldrum S, Feng C, Fisher SG, Guzick DS. Effect of mifepristone for symptomatic leiomyomata on quality of life and uterine size: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol.2006;108:1381–1387.
Not in our library10.1097/01.aog.0000243776.23391.7b
- 74.
Fischer K, McDannold NJ, Tempany CM, Jolesz FA, Fennessy FM. Potential of minimally invasive procedures in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a focus on magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound therapy. Int J Womens Health.2015;7:901–912.
Not in our library10.2147/ijwh.s55564
- 75.
Fukuda M, Tanaka T, Kamada M, et al Comparison of the perinatal outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest2013;76:203e8.
Not in our library10.1159/000355098
- 76.
Flynn M, Jamison M, Datta S, Myers E. Health care resource use for uterine fibroid tumors in the United States. Am J Obstet Gyncol. 2006;195:955–964.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.020
- 77.
Galliano D, Bellver J, Días-Garcia C, Simón C, Pellicer A. ART and uterine pathology: how revelant is the maternal side for implantation. Hum Reprod Update2015;21:13–38.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmu047
- 78.
Gargiulo AR, Srouji SS, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Vellinga TT, Einarsson JI. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:284–291.
Not in our library10.1097/aog.0b013e3182602c7d
- 79.
Gemzell Danielsson K, Hamberg M. The effect of antiprogestin (RU 486) and prostaglandin biosynthesis inhibitor (naproxen) on uterine fluid prostaglandin F2 alpha concentrations. Hum. Reprod 1994;9:1926–1630.
Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138763
- 80.
Gupta S, Jose J, Manyonda I. Clinical presentation of fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol2008;22:615–626.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.01.008
- 81.
Gupta JK, Sinha A, Lumsden MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2012;5:CD005073.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd005073.pub3
- 82.
Gupta JK, Sinha A, Lumsden MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids.Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2014;12:CD005073.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd005073.pub4
- 83.
Gutmann JN, Corson SL. GnRH agonist therapy before myomectomy or hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2005;12:529–537.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2005.09.012
- 84.
Hald K, Langebrekke A, Klow NE, Noreng HJ, Berge AB, Istre O. Laparoscopic occlusion of uterine vessels for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: Initial experience and comparison to uterine artery embolization. YMOB2004;190:37–43.
Not in our library10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00910-4
- 85.
Goodwin SC, Spies JB. Uterine fibroid embolization. N Engl J Med2009;13:690–697.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmct0806942
- 86.
Higham JM, O'Brien PM, Shaw RW. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1990;97:734–739.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x
- 87.
Islam MS, Akhtar MM, Ciavattini A, Giannubilo SR, Protic O, Janjusevic M, Procopio AD, Segars JH, Castellucci M, Ciarmela P. Use of dietary phytochemicals to target inflammation, fibrosis, proliferation, and angiogenesis in uterine tissues: promising options for prevention and treatment of uterine fibroids. Mol Nutr Food Res2014;58:1667–1684.
Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201400134
- 88.
Islam S, Protic O, Giannubilo SR, Toti P, Tranquilli AL, Petraglia F, Castellucci M, Ciarmela P Uterine Leiomyoma: Available Medical Treatments and New Possible Therapeutic Options. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2013;98;921–934.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2012-3237
- 89.
Islam MS, Protic O, Stortoni P, Grechi G, Lamanna P, Petraglia F, Castellucci M, Ciarmela P. Complex networks of multiple factors in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma. Fertil Steril2013;100:178–193.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.007
- 90.
Jacoby VL, Kohi MP, Poder L, Jacoby A, Lager J, Schembri M, Rieke V, Grady D, Vittinghoff E, Coakley FV. PROMISe trial: a pilot, randomized, placebo–controlled trial of magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril.2015;S0015–0282:02090–02097.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.014
- 91.
Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ2005;330:1478.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478
- 92.
Kanade TT, McKenna JB, Choi S, Tsai BP, Rosen DM, Cario GM, Chou D Sydney contained in bag morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2014;21:981.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.005
- 93.
Karmon AE, Cardozo ER, Rueda BR, Styer AK MicroRNAs in the development and pathobiology of uterine leiomyomata: does evidence support future strategies for clinical intervention?Hum Reprod Update2014;20:670–687.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmu017
- 94.
Kaump GR, Spies JB. The impact of uterine artery embolization on ovarian function.J Vasc Interv Radiol2013;24:459–467.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jvir.2012.12.002
- 95.
Khan AT, Shehmar M, Gupta JK. Uterine fibroids: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health2014;6:95–114.
Not in our library10.2147/ijwh.s51083
- 96.
Kim HK, Kim D, Lee MK, Lee CR, Kang SY, Chung YJ, Cho HH, Kim JH, Kim MR. Three cases of complications after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in unmarried women. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58:542–546.
Not in our library10.5468/ogs.2015.58.6.542
- 97.
Kim YS, Lim HK, Park MJ, Rhim H, Jung SH, Sohn I, Kim TJ, Keserci B. Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction Model for Assessing Immediate Therapeutic Response to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids. Invest Radiol.2016;51:15–24.
Not in our library10.1097/rli.0000000000000199
- 98.
Kim J, Sefton EC. The role of progesterone signaling in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol.2012;358:223–231.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.044
- 99.
Kho KA, Brown DN. Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids Within a Containment System and Without Power Morcellation. Clin Obstet Gynecol.2016;59:85–92.
Not in our library10.1097/grf.0000000000000168
- 100.
Kroencke TJ, Scheurig C, Poellinger A, Gronewold M, Hamm B. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: percentage of infarction predicts clinical outcome. Radiology2010;255:834–841.
Not in our library10.1148/radiol.10090977
- 101.
Lam SJ, Best S, Kumar S. The impact of fibroid characteristics on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol2014;211:395.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.066
- 102.
Lasmar RB, Barrozo PR, Dias R, Oliveira MA. Submucous myomas: a new presurgical classification to evaluate the viability of hysteroscopic surgical treatment—preliminary report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2005;12:308–311.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.014
- 103.
Laughlin SK, Schroeder JC, Baird DD. New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Semin Reprod Med2010;28:204–217.
Not in our library10.1055/s-0030-1251477
- 104.
Lee MM, Matsuzono T. Hysteroscopic intrauterine morcellation of submucosal fibroids: preliminary results in Hong Kong and comparisons with conventional hysteroscopic monopolar loop resection. Hong Kong Med J2016;10:12809.
Not in our library10.12809/hkmj154600
- 105.
Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B, Sowter M. Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2001:4.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd000547
- 106.
Lewis EI, Srouji SS, Gargiulo AR. Robotic single-site myomectomy: initial report and technique. Fertil Steril2015;103:1370–1377.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.021
- 107.
Lieng M, Berner E, Busund B. Risk of morcellation of uterine leiomyosarcomas in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy, a retrospective trial including 4791 women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2015;22:410–414.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.022
- 108.
Lin G, Yang LY, Huang YT, Ng KK, Ng SH, Ueng SH, Chao A, Yen TC, Chang TC, Lai CH. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation between uterine leiomyosarcoma/smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential and benign leiomyoma. J Magn Reson Imaging2015;10:1002.
Not in our library10.1002/jmri.24998
- 109.
Liu JP, Yang H, Xia Y, Cardini F. Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013;4:CD005292.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd005292.pub3
- 110.
Liu WM, Wang PH, Chou CS, Tang WL, Wang IT, Tzeng CR. Efficacy of combined laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion and myomectomy via minilaparotomy in the treatment of recurrent uterine myomas. Fertil Steril2007;87:356–361.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1497
- 111.
Lumsden MA, Hamoodi I, Gupta J, Hickey M. Fibroids: diagnosis and management. BMJ.2015;351:h4887.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.h4887
- 112.
Luyckx M, Squifflet JL, Jadoul P, Votino R, Dolmans MM, Donnez J. First series of 18 pregnancies after ulipristal acetate treatment for uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril2014;102:1404–1409.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1253
- 113.
Lykke R, Blaakær J, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. Hysterectomy in Denmark 1977–2011: changes in rate, indications, and hospitalization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2013;171:333–338.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.011
- 114.
Mäkinen N, Mehine M, Tolvanen J, Kaasinen E, Li Y, Lehtonen HJ, Gentile M, Yan J, Enge M, Taipale M, et al MED12, the mediator complex subunit 12 gene, is mutated at high frequency in uterine leiomyomas. Science2011;334:252–255.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1208930
- 115.
Malone LJ. Myomectomy: reccurence after removal of solitary and multiple myomas. Obstet Gynecol1969;34:200–209.
Not in our library
- 116.
Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Iuzzolino D, Surico D, Reich H. Laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: short-term and fertility results. Fertil Steril2010;93:2368–2373.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.127
- 117.
Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randozimed controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol2008;31;73–85.
Not in our library10.1007/s00270-007-9195-2
- 118.
Mara M, Kubinova K. Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons. Int J Womens Health.2014;6:623–629.
Not in our library10.2147/ijwh.s43591
- 119.
Marret H, Fritel X, Ouldamer L, Bendifallah S, Brun JL, De Jesus I, Derrien J, Giraudet G, Kahn V, Koskas M, et al Therapeutic management of uterine fibroid tumors: updated French guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2012;165:156–164.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.030
- 120.
Marsh EE, Chibber S, Wu J, Siegersma K, Kim J, Bulun S. Epidermal growth factor-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1 expression and regulation in uterine leiomyoma. Fertil Steril2015;S0015–0282:02172.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.004
- 121.
Marshall LM, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Goldman MB, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Hunter DJ. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol1997;90:967–973.
Not in our library10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00534-6
- 122.
Mazzon I, Favilli A, Grasso M, Horvath S, Di Renzo GC, Gerli S. Is cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy a safe and effective technique for the treatment of submucous myomas with intramural development? A series of 1434 surgical procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:792–798.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.004
- 123.
McKenna JB, Kanade T, Choi S, Tsai BP, Rosen DM, Cario GM, Chou D. The Sydney contained in bag morcellation technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2014;21:984–985.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.007
- 124.
Mehine M, Kaasinen E, Aaltonen LA. Chromothripsis in uterine leiomyomas. N Engl J Med2013;369:2160–2161.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmc1310230
- 125.
Mehine M, Mäkinen N, Heinonen HR, Aaltonen LA, Vahteristo P. Genomics of uterine leiomyomas: insights from high-throughput sequencing. Fertil Steril2014;102:621–629.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.050
- 126.
Metwally M, Cheong YC, Horne AW. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012;11:CD003857.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd003857.pub3
- 127.
Metwally M, Farquhar CM, Li TC. Is another meta-analysis on the effects of intramural fibroids on reproductive outcomes needed. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:2–14.
Not in our library10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.08.006
- 128.
Mittal P, Shin YH, Yatsenko SA, Castro CA, Surti U, Rajkovic A. Med12 gain-of-function mutation causes leiomyomas and genomic instability. J Clin Invest2015;125:3280–3284.
Not in our library10.1172/jci81534
- 129.
Monleón J, Martínez-Varea A, Galliano D, Pellicer A. Successful pregnancy after treatment with ulipristal acetate for uterine fibroids. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol2014;2014:314587.
Not in our library10.1155/2014/314587
- 130.
Moravek MB, Yin P, Ono M, Coon JS V, Dyson MT, Navarro A, Marsh EE, Chakravarti D, Kim JJ, Wei JL, et al Ovarian steroids, stem cells and uterine leiomyoma: therapeutic implications. Hum Reprod Update2015;21:1–12.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmu048
- 131.
Moroni RM, Martins WP, Ferriani RA, Vieira CS, Nastri CO, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Brito LG. Add-back therapy with GnRH analogues for uterine fibroids. CochraneDatabase Syst Rev2015;3:CD010854.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd010854.pub2
- 132.
Moss J, Christie A. Uterine artery embolization for heavy menstrual bleeding. Womens Health2016;12:71–77.
Not in our library10.2217/whe.15.78
- 133.
Munro MG. Hysteroscopic Myomectomy of FIGO Type 2 Leiomyomas Under Local Anesthesia: Bipolar Radiofrequency Needle-Based Release Followed By Electromechanical Morcellation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2016;23:12–13.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.002
- 134.
Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS. FIGO Working Group on Menstrual DisordersFIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2011;113:1–2.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011
- 135.
Mussalam KM, Tamim HM, Richards T, Spahn DR, Rosendaal FR, Habbal A, Khreiss M, Dahdaleh FS, Khavandi K, Sfeir PM, et al Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet2011;378:1396–1407.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61381-0
- 136.
Mutter GL, Bergeron C, Deligdisch L, Ferenczy A, Glant M, Merino M, Williams AR, Blithe DL. The spectrum of endometrial pathology induced by progesterone receptormodulators. Mod Pathol2008;21:591–598.
Not in our library10.1038/modpathol.2008.19
- 137.
Nelson AL, Ritchie JJ. Severe anemia from heavy menstrual bleeding requires heightened attention. Am J Obstet Gynecol2015;213:97.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.023
- 138.
Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy-a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril2009;91:556–559.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.092
- 139.
Nieman LK, Blocker W, Nansel T, Mahoney S, Reynolds J, Blithe D, Wesley R, Armstrong A. Symptomatic uterine fibroids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb study. Fertil Steril2011;95:767–772.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.059
- 140.
Nisolle M, Donnez J. Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities. Fertil Steril1997;68:585–596.
Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00191-x
- 141.
Nisolle M, Gillerot S, Casanas-Roux F, Squifflet J, Berliere M, Donnez J. Immunohistochemical study of the proliferation index, oestrogen receptors and progesterone receptors A and B in leiomyomata and normal myometrium during the menstrual cycle and under gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist therapy. Hum Reprod1999;14:2844–2850.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/14.11.2844
- 142.
Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, Russo T, Marconi D, Tolino A, Manguso F, Mattei A, Zullo F. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril2007;88:933–941.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.047
- 143.
Parazzini F, Tozzi L, Bianchi S. Pregnancy outcome and uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol2015;S1521–6934:00231–0023.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.017
- 144.
Park MJ, Kim YS, Rhim H, Lim HK. Safety and therapeutic efficacy of complete or near-complete ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors by MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused US therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol2014;25:231–239.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jvir.2013.11.011
- 145.
Parker WH. Etiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril.2007;87:725–736.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.093
- 146.
Parker WH, Einarsson J, Istre O, Dubuisson JB. Risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2010;17:551–554.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.015
- 147.
Parker WH, Feskanich D, Broder MS, et al Long-term mortality associated with oophorectomy compared with ovarian conservation in the nurses’ health study. Obstet Gynecol2013;121:709–716.
Not in our library10.1097/aog.0b013e3182864350
- 148.
Parker WH, Kaunitz AM, Pritts EA, Olive DL, Chalas E, Clarke-Pearson DL, Berek JS. Leiomyoma Morcellation Review Group U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Guidance regarding morcellation of leiomyomas: well-intentioned, but is it harmful for women?Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:18–22.
Not in our library10.1097/aog.0000000000001157
- 149.
Parker WH, Pritts EA, Olive DL. What is the future of open intraperitoneal power-morcellation of fibroids? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016;59:73–84.
Not in our library10.1097/grf.0000000000000166
- 150.
Peddada SD, Laughlin SK, Miner K, Guyon JP, Haneke K, Vahdat HL, Semelka RC, Kowalik A, Armao D, Davis B, Baird DD Growth of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal blanck and white women. Proc Natl AcadSci USA2008;105:19887–19892.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0808188105
- 151.
Pereira N, Bender JL, Hancock K, Lekovich JP, Elias RT, Kligman I, Rosenwaks Z. Routine monitoring of liver, renal, and hematologic tests after single- or double-dose methotrexate treatment for ectopic pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2015;22:1266–1270.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2015.07.014
- 152.
Petraglia F, Serour GI, Chapron C. The changing prevalence of infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2013;123:S4–S8.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.005
- 153.
Pitter MC, Gargiulo AR, Bonaventura LM, Lehman JS, Srouji SS. Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy. Hum Reprod2013;28:99–108.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/des365
- 154.
Pohl O, Osterloh I, Gotteland JP. Ulipristal acetate - safety and pharmacokinetics following multiple doses of 10–50 mg per day. J Clin Pharm Ther2013;38:314–320.
Not in our library10.1111/jcpt.12065
- 155.
Pohl O, Zobrist RH, Gotteland JP. The clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of ulipristal acetate for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Reprod Sci2015;22:476–483.
Not in our library10.1177/1933719114549850
- 156.
Poole AJ, Li Y, Kim Y, Lin SC, Lee WH, Lee EY Prevention of Brca-1 mediated mammary tumorigenesis in mice by a progesterone antagonist. Science2006;314:1467–1470.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1130471
- 157.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons Myomas and reproductive function. Fertil Steril2008;90:S125–S130.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.012
- 158.
Pritts EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv2001;56:483–491.
Not in our library10.1097/00006254-200108000-00022
- 159.
Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril2009;91:1215–1223.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.051
- 160.
Pritts EA, Parker WH, Brown J, Olive DL. Outcome of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma after surgery for presumed uterine fibroids: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2015;22:26–33.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.781
- 161.
Protic O, Toti P, Islam MS, Occhini R, Giannubilo SR, Catherino WH, Cinti S, Petraglia F, Ciavattini A, Castellucci M, et al Possible involvement of inflammatory/reparative processes in the development of uterine fibroids. Cell Tissue Res.2015;26613601(PMID)
Not in our library10.1007/s00441-015-2324-3
- 162.
Rabinovici J, David M, Fukunishi H, Morita Y, Gostout BS, Stewart EA MRgFUS Study Group Pregnancy outcome after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril2010;93:199e209.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.001
- 163.
Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-vigneron N, Bouret JM, Houdart E, Aymard A, Merland JJ. Arterial embolization to treat uterine myomata. Lancet1995;346:671–672.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92282-2
- 164.
Richards T, Musallam KM, Nassif J, Ghazeeri G, Seoud M, Gurusamy KS, Jamali FR. Impact of preoperative anaemia and blood transfusion on postoperative outcomes in gynaecological surgery. PLoS One2015;6:10.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0130861
- 165.
Sankaran S, Manyonda IT. Medical management of fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin obstet Gynaecol.2008;22:655–676.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.03.001
- 166.
Saravelos SH, Yan J, Rehmani H, Li TC. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod2011;26:3274e9.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/der293
- 167.
Saridogan E. Surgical treatment of fibroids in heavy menstrual bleeding. Womens Health (Lond Engl)2016;12:53–62.
Not in our library10.2217/whe.15.89
- 168.
Segars JH, Parrott EC, Nagel JD, Guo XC, Gao X, Birnbaum LS, Pinn VW, Dixon D. Proceedings from the third National Institutes of Health International Congress on advances in uterine leiomyoma research: comprehensive review, conference summary and future recommendations. Hum Reprod Update2014;20:309–333.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmt058
- 169.
Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Douiri A, Jayaprakasan K, Khalaf Y. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Hum Reprod Update2015;21:262–274.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmu057
- 170.
Shavell VI, Thakur M, Sawant A, Kruger ML, Jones TB, Singh M, Puscheck EE, Diamond MP. Adverse obstetric outcomes associated with sonographically identified large uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril2012;97:107–110.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.009
- 171.
Shen Q, Chen M, Wang Y, Zhou Q, Tao X, Zhang W, Zhu X. Effects of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy on uterine leiomyoma: a meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2015;22:177e84.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.007
- 172.
Shen Q, Hua Y, Jiang W, Zhang W, Chen M, Zhu X. Effects of mifepristone on uterine leiomyoma in premenopausal women: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril2013;100:1722–1726.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.039
- 173.
Siedhoff MT, Wheeler SB, Rutstein SE, Geller EJ, Doll KM, Wu JM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroid tumors in premenopausal women: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol2015;212:591.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.006
- 174.
Sinclair DC, Mastroyannis A, Taylor HS. Leiomyoma simultaneously impair endometrial BMP-2-mediated decidualization and anticoagulant expression through secretion of TGF-β3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2011;96:412–421.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2010-1450
- 175.
Soliman AM, Yang H, Du EX, Kelkar SS, Winkel C. The direct and indirect costs of uterine fibroid tumors: a systematic review of the literature between 2000 and 2013. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:141–160.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.019
- 176.
Somigliana S, Vercellini P, Daguati R, Pasin R, De Giorgi O, Crosignani PG. Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence. Hum Reprod Update2007;13:465–476.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmm013
- 177.
Song H, Lu D, Navaratnam K, Shi G. Aromatase inhibitors for uterine fibroids.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013;10:CD009505.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd009505.pub2
- 178.
Spies JB. Current role of uterine artery embolization in the management of uterine fibroids. Clin Obstet Gynecol2016;59:93–102.
Not in our library10.1097/grf.0000000000000162
- 179.
Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol2002;99:290–300.
Not in our library10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1
- 180.
Spitz IM. Clinical utility of progesterone receptor modulators and their effect on the endometrium. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol2009;21:318–324.
Not in our library10.1097/gco.0b013e32832e07e8
- 181.
Stamatellos I, Bontis J. Hysteroscopic myomectomy. Eur Clin Obstet Gynecol2007;3:17–23.
Not in our library
- 182.
Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet2001;357:293–298 Review
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03622-9
- 183.
Stewart EA. Clinical practice. Uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med.2015;372:1646–1655.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmcp1411029
- 184.
Stewart EA, Nicholson WK, Bradley L, Borah BJ. The burden of uterine fibroids for African-American women: results of a national survey. J Womens Health (Larch-rnt)2013;22:807–816.
Not in our library10.1089/jwh.2013.4334
- 185.
Styer AK, Rueda BR. The Epidemiology and Genetics of Uterine Leiomyoma. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol2015: S1521–6934:00232–1.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.018
- 186.
Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reprod2010;25:418–429.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dep396
- 187.
Tan YH, Lethaby A. Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013;11.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd010241.pub2
- 188.
Thomas RL, Winkler N, Carr BR, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Abdominal myomectomy—a safe procedure in an ambulatory setting. Fertil Steril2010;94:2277–2280.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.019
- 189.
Tian YC, Long TF, Dai YM Pregnancy outcomes following different surgical approaches of myomectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res2015;41:350e7.
Not in our library10.1111/jog.12532
- 190.
Ton R, Kilic GS,Phelps JY. A medical-legal review of power morcellation in the face of the recent FDA warning and litigation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol2015;22:564–572.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.017
- 191.
Tristan M, Orozco LJ, Steed A, Ramírez-Morera A, Stone P. Mifepristone foruterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012;8:CD007687.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd007687.pub2
- 192.
Tsigkou A, Reis FM, Lee MH, Jiang B, Tosti C, Centini G, Shen FR, Chen YG, Petraglia F. Increased progesterone receptor expression in uterine leiomyoma: correlation with age, number of leiomyomas, and clinical symptoms. Fertil Steril.2015;104:170–175.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.024
- 193.
Vannuccini S, Clifton VL, Fraser IS, Taylor HS, Critchley H, Giudice LC, Petraglia F. Infertility and reproductive disorders: impact of hormonal and inflammatory mechanisms on pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod Update2016;22:104–115.
Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmv044
- 194.
Vilos GA, Allaire C, Laberge PY, Leyland N; Special Contributors, Vilos AG, Murji A, Chen I. The management of uterine leiomyomas. J Obstet Gynaecol Can.2015;37:157–181.
Not in our library10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30338-8
- 195.
Vilos GA, Hollett-Caines J, Burbank F. Uterine artery occlusion: what is the evidence? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:798–810.
Not in our library10.1097/01.grf.0000211950.74583.f5
- 196.
Whitaker LH, Williams AR, Critchley HO. Selective progesterone receptor modulators. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol2014;26:237–242.
Not in our library10.1097/gco.0000000000000082
- 197.
Wilkens J, Male V, Ghazal P, Forster T, Gibson DA, Williams AR, Brito-Mutunayagam SL, Craigon M, Lourenco P, Cameron IT, et al Uterine NK cells regulate endometrial bleeding in women and are suppressed by the progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil. J Immunol2013;191:2226–2235.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1300958
- 198.
Wilkens J, Williams AR, Chwalisz K, Han C, Cameron IT, Critchley HO. Effect of asoprisnil on uterine proliferation markers and endometrial expression of the tumour suppressor gene, PTEN. Hum Reprod2009;24:1036–1044.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/den494
- 199.
Williams AR, Bergeron C, Barlox DH, Ferenczy A. Endometrial morphology after treatment of uterine fibroids with the selective progesterone receptor modulator, ulipristal acetate. Int J Gynecol Pathol2012;31:556–569.
Not in our library10.1097/pgp.0b013e318251035b
- 200.
Williams AR, Critchley HO, Osei J, Ingamells S, Cameron IT, Han C, Chwalisz K. The effects of the selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil on themorphology of uterine tissues after 3 months treatment in patients withsymptomatic uterine leiomyomata. Hum Reprod2007;22:1696–1704.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dem026
- 201.
Wise LA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: from menarche to menopause. Clin Obstet Gynecol2016;59:2–24.
Not in our library10.1097/grf.0000000000000164
- 202.
Wise LA, Palmer JR, Harlow BL, Spiegelman D, Stewart EA, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Risk of uterine leiomyomata in relation to tobacco, alcohol and caffeine consumption in the Black Women's Health Study. Hum Reprod2004;19:1746–1754.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deh309
- 203.
Wise LA, Palmer JR, Spiegelman D, Harlow BL, Stewart EA, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Influence of body size and body fat distribution on risk of uterine leiomyomata in U.S. black women. Epidemiology2005;16:346–354.
Not in our library10.1097/01.ede.0000158742.11877.99
- 204.
Wise LA, Radin RG, Palmer JR, Kumanyika SK, Boggs DA, Rosenberg L. Intake of fruit, vegetables, and carotenoids in relation to risk of uterine leiomyomata. Am J Clin Nutr2011;94:1620–1631.
Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.111.016600
- 205.
Wong L, White N, Ramkrishna J, Araujo Júnior E, Meagher S, Costa Fda S Three-dimensional imaging of the uterus: the value of the coronal plane. World J Radiol2015;7:484–493.
Not in our library10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.484
- 206.
Wong JY, Gold EB, Johnson WO, Lee JS. Circulating Sex Hormones and Risk of Uterine Fibroids: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). J Clin Endocrinol Metab2016;101:123–130.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2015-2935
- 207.
Wright JD, Tergas AI, Burke WM, Cui RR, Ananth CV, Chen L, Hershman DL Uterine pathology in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy using morcellation. JAMA2014;312:1253–1255.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2014.9005
- 208.
Yan L MD, Ding L, Li C, Wang YD PH, Tang R, Chen ZJ. Effect of fibroids not distorting the endometrial cavity on the outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril2014;101:716–721.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.023
- 209.
Yin P, Ono M, Moravek MB, Coon JS V, Navarro A, Monsivais D, Dyson MT, Druschitz SA, Malpani SS, Serna VA, et al Human uterine leiomyoma stem/progenitor cells expressing CD34 and CD49b initiate tumors in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2015;100:E601–E606.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2014-2134
- 210.
Zepiridis LI, Grimbizis GF, Tarlatzis BC. Infertility and uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol2015;S1521–6934:00235–00237.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.12.001
- 211.
Zupi E, Centini G, Sabbioni L, Lazzeri L, Argay IM, Petraglia F. Nonsurgical alternatives for uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol2015;S1521–6934:00227–00228.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.013
- 212.
Zupi E, Piredda A, Marconi D, Townsend D, Exacoustos C, Arduini D, Szabolcs B. Directed laparoscopic cryomyolysis: a possible alternative to myomectomy and/or hysterectomy for symptomatic leiomyomas. YMOB2004;190:639–643.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.687
Cited by papers we hold 5
- Hysteroscopic resection of type 3 fibroids could improve the pregnancy outcomes in infertile women: a case–control study · 2022Not checked
- Progesterone Actions and Resistance in Gynecological Disorders · 2022No notice
- Assessing burden, risk factors, and perceived impact of uterine fibroids on women’s lives in rural Haiti: implications for advancing a health equity agenda, a mixed methods study · 2021Not checked
- Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review · 2021No notice
- Ultrasonographic characterisation of obstructive uropathy in Nigerian women with uterine fibroids · 2018Not checked
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.