Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach

Abstract

Document analysis is one of the most commonly used and powerful methods in health policy research. While existing qualitative research manuals offer direction for conducting document analysis, there has been little specific discussion about how to use this method to understand and analyse health policy. Drawing on guidance from other disciplines and our own research experience, we present a systematic approach for document analysis in health policy research called the READ approach: (1) ready your materials, (2) extract data, (3) analyse data and (4) distil your findings. We provide practical advice on each step, with consideration of epistemological and theoretical issues such as the socially constructed nature of documents and their role in modern bureaucracies. We provide examples of document analysis from two case studies from our work in Pakistan and Niger in which documents provided critical insight and advanced empirical and theoretical understanding of a health policy issue. Coding tools for each case study are included as Supplementary Files to inspire and guide future research. These case studies illustrate the value of rigorous document analysis to understand policy content and processes and discourse around policy, in ways that are either not possible using other methods, or greatly enrich other methods such as in-depth interviews and observation. Given the central nature of documents to health policy research and importance of reading them critically, the READ approach provides practical guidance on gaining the most out of documents and ensuring rigour in document analysis.

References 40

1. 1.

   Abdelmutti N, Hoffman-Goetz L. 2009 Risk messages about HPV, cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccine Gardasil: a content analysis of Canadian and U.S. national newspaper articles. Women & Health 49: 422–40.

   Not in our library10.1080/03630240903238776

2. 2.

   Adebiyi BO, Mukumbang FC, Beytell A-M. 2019 To what extent is fetal alcohol spectrum disorder considered in policy-related documents in South Africa? A document review. Health Research Policy and Systems 17:

   Not in our library10.1186/s12961-019-0447-9

3. 3.

   Atkinson PA, Coffey A. 1997 Analysing documentary realities In: Silverman D (ed). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: SAGE.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Bardach E, Patashnik EM. 2015 Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. Los Angeles: SAGE.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   Bennett S, Dalglish SL, Juma PA, Rodríguez DC. 2015 Altogether now… understanding the role of international organizations in iCCM policy transfer. Health Policy and Planning 30: ii26–35.

   Not in our library10.1093/heapol/czv071

6. 6.

   Berner-Rodoreda A, Bärnighausen T, Kennedy C et al 2018 From doxastic to epistemic: a typology and critique of qualitative interview styles. Qualitative Inquiry 26: 291–305. 1077800418810724.

   Not in our library10.1177/1077800418810724

7. 7.

   Bowen GA. 2009 Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9: 27–40.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Bryman A. 1994 Analyzing Qualitative Data.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. 2005 Making Health Policy. New York: Open University Press.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Charmaz K. 2006 Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Claassen L, Smid T, Woudenberg F, Timmermans DRM. 2012 Media coverage on electromagnetic fields and health: content analysis of Dutch newspaper articles and websites. Health, Risk & Society 14: 681–96.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Creswell JW. 2013 Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Dalglish SL, Rodríguez DC, Harouna A, Surkan PJ. 2017 Knowledge and power in policy-making for child survival in Niger. Social Science & Medicine 177: 150–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.056

14. 14.

    Dalglish SL, Surkan PJ, Diarra A, Harouna A, Bennett S. 2015 Power and pro-poor policies: the case of iCCM in Niger. Health Policy and Planning 30: ii84–94.

    Not in our library10.1093/heapol/czv064

15. 15.

    Entman RM. 1993 Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43: 51–8.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Fournier G, Djermakoye IA. 1975 Village health teams in Niger (Maradi Department) In: Newell KW (ed). Health by the People. Geneva: WHO.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Gurung G, Derrett S, Gauld R. 2020 The role and functions of community health councils in New Zealand’s health system: a document analysis. The New Zealand Medical Journal 133: 70–82.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Harvey L. 1990 Critical Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Harvey SA. 2018 Observe before you leap: why observation provides critical insights for formative research and intervention design that you’ll never get from focus groups, interviews, or KAP surveys. Global Health: Science and Practice 6: 299–316.

    Not in our library10.9745/ghsp-d-17-00328

20. 20.

    Institut National de la Statistique. 2010. Rapport National sur les Progrès vers l'atteinte des Objectifs du Millénaire pour le Développement. Niamey, Niger: INS.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Kamarulzaman A. 2013 Fighting the HIV epidemic in the Islamic world. Lancet 381: 2058–60.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61033-8

22. 22.

    Katchmarchi AB, Taliaferro AR, Kipfer HJ. 2018 A document analysis of drowning prevention education resources in the United States. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 25: 78–84.

    Not in our library10.1080/17457300.2017.1341932

23. 23.

    Krippendorff K. 2004 Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Marten R. 2019 How states exerted power to create the Millennium Development Goals and how this shaped the global health agenda: lessons for the sustainable development goals and the future of global health. Global Public Health 14: 584–99.

    Not in our library10.1080/17441692.2018.1468474

25. 25.

    Maxwell JA. 2005 Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Mayring P. 2004 Qualitative Content Analysis. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds). A Companion to Qualitative Research SAGE.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Ministère de la Santé Publique. 2010. Enquête nationale sur la survie des enfants de 0 à 59 mois et la mortalité au Niger 2010. Niamey, Niger: MSP.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Mogalakwe M. 2009 The documentary research method—using documentary sources in social research. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review 25: 43–58.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Nelkin D. 1991 AIDS and the news media. The Milbank Quarterly 69: 293–307.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Ouedraogo O, Doudou MH, Drabo KM et al 2020 Policy overview of the multisectoral nutrition planning process: the progress, challenges, and lessons learned from Burkina Faso. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 35: 120–39.

    Not in our library10.1002/hpm.2823

31. 31.

    Prior L. 2003 Using Documents in Social Research. London: SAGE.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Shiffman J, Stanton C, Salazar AP. 2004 The emergence of political priority for safe motherhood in Honduras. Health Policy and Planning 19: 380–90.

    Not in our library10.1093/heapol/czh053

33. 33.

    Smith KC, Washington C, Welding K et al 2017 Cigarette stick as valuable communicative real estate: a content analysis of cigarettes from 14 low-income and middle-income countries. Tobacco Control 26: 604–7.

    Not in our library10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053148

34. 34.

    Strömbäck J, Dimitrova DV. 2011 Mediatization and media interventionism: a comparative analysis of Sweden and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16: 30–49.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Watt D. 2007 On becoming a qualitative researcher: the value of reflexivity. Qualitative Report 12: 82–101.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Weber M. 2015 Bureaucracy In: Waters T, Waters D (eds). Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Wesley JJ. 2010. Qualitative Document Analysis in Political Science.

    Not in our library

39. 39.

    World Health Organization. 2006. Country Health System Fact Sheet 2006: Niger. Niamey, Niger: WHO.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Yin R. 1994 Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Innovations, contestations and fragilities of the health system response to COVID-19 in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. · 2021
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.