Testing gene–environment interactions in the presence of confounders and mismeasured environmental exposures
Chao Cheng, Donna Spiegelman, Zuoheng Wang and 1 more
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics · 2021
doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab236 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
AbstractInterest in investigating gene–environment (GxE) interactions has rapidly increased over the last decade. Although GxE interactions have been extremely investigated in large studies, few such effects have been identified and replicated, highlighting the need to develop statistical GxE tests with greater statistical power. The reverse test has been proposed for testing the interaction effect between continuous exposure and genetic variants in relation to a binary disease outcome, which leverages the idea of linear discriminant analysis, significantly increasing statistical power comparing to the standard logistic regression approach. However, this reverse approach did not take into consideration adjustment for confounders. Since GxE interaction studies are inherently nonexperimental, adjusting for potential confounding effects is critical for valid evaluation of GxE interactions. In this study, we extend the reverse test to allow for confounders. The proposed reverse test also allows for exposure measurement errors as typically occurs. Extensive simulation experiments demonstrated that the proposed method not only provides greater statistical power under most simulation scenarios but also provides substantive computational efficiency, which achieves a computation time that is more than sevenfold less than that of the standard logistic regression test. In an illustrative example, we applied the proposed approach to the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) to search for genetic susceptibility loci modifying the smoking-HIV status association.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References34
- 8.
33 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.