No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.
SGLT2 inhibitors: from glucose-lowering to cardiovascular benefits
Alberto Preda, Fabrizio Montecucco, Federico Carbone and 4 more
Cardiovascular Research · 2024 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
An increasing number of individuals are at high risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its cardiovascular complications, including heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and eventually premature death. The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) protein sits in the proximal tubule of human nephrons to regulate glucose reabsorption and its inhibition by gliflozins represents the cornerstone of contemporary T2D and HF management. Herein, we aim to provide an updated overview of the pleiotropy of gliflozins, provide mechanistic insights and delineate related cardiovascular (CV) benefits. By discussing contemporary evidence obtained in preclinical models and landmark randomized controlled trials, we move from bench to bedside across the broad spectrum of cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases. With landmark randomized controlled trials confirming a reduction in major adverse CV events (MACE; composite endpoint of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke), SGLT2 inhibitors strongly mitigate the risk for heart failure hospitalization in diabetics and non-diabetics alike while conferring renoprotection in specific patient populations. Along four major pathophysiological axes (i.e. at systemic, vascular, cardiac, and renal levels), we provide insights into the key mechanisms that may underlie their beneficial effects, including gliflozins’ role in the modulation of inflammation, oxidative stress, cellular energy metabolism, and housekeeping mechanisms. We also discuss how this drug class controls hyperglycaemia, ketogenesis, natriuresis, and hyperuricaemia, collectively contributing to their pleiotropic effects. Finally, evolving data in the setting of cerebrovascular diseases and arrhythmias are presented and potential implications for future research and clinical practice are comprehensively reviewed.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
The surge in incidence and prevalence of type II diabetes mellitus (T2D) challenges healthcare systems around the globe. Indeed, the number of diabetic patients is expected to almost double from 382 million in 2013 to 592 million by 2035, putting an increasing proportion of individuals at increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. In fact, patients with T2D are at two- to three-fold increased risk of developing CV disease, the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries and beyond. Concurring with the increased CV risk, T2D is a major driver of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and accelerates its progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) ultimately leading to renal replacement therapy.
Considering the above, glycaemic control intertwined with multidisciplinary CV risk reduction remains therapeutic hallmarks of T2D management. Over the last few decades, our armamentarium for the medical treatment of T2D expanded considerably, with randomized evidence on sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) providing convincing evidence for the prevention of CV complications. SGLTi, (also referred to as gliflozins), effectively reduce blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin levels among patients with T2D without inducing hypoglycaemia. In addition, gliflozins—in contrast to traditional antidiabetics—prevent heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and improve renal function irrespective of T2D with negligible adverse effects.
Accordingly, GLP-1RA or SGLT2i are recommended by the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Diabetes as first-line therapy for T2D patients at high CV risk, such as those with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD), CKD or HF. The use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i increased markedly in recent years, with SGLT2i now leading prescription rates. In addition to their convenient oral route of administration, SGLT2i reduce the risk of the combined endpoint of CV death and hospitalizations in patients with HF irrespective of ejection fraction,, and are accordingly recommended by both European and American guidelines. Herein, we aim to provide a translational overview of SGLT2i, covering both experimental and clinical evidence, moving from mechanisms studied in preclinical models to the clinical setting across the broad spectrum of CV disease.
Mechanisms underlying glucose-lowering
SGLT2 expression is mainly confined to the proximal tubule of the nephron, contributing to roughly 90% of the kidney's capacity to reabsorb glucose. While transepithelial glucose uptake is an active Na+/K+ ATPase-dependent process that is driven by the sodium gradient across the brush-border membrane, intracellularly accumulated glucose exits the tubular cells via glucose transporter-2 towards the interstitial fluid and the peritubular capillary, making SGLT2 an attractive therapeutic target to reduce glucose reabsorption from urine back to the circulation. SGLT2i development was stimulated by the identification of phlorizin, a glucoside typically found in the root bark of fruit trees and known to block sugar transport in several tissues, including the kidney and small intestine., Initial attempts to study its glucose-lowering effects in diabetic rats confirmed that phlorizin-induced glycosuria indeed normalizes plasma glucose levels and restores insulin sensitivity without inducing hypoglycaemia. While the expression of low-capacity but high-affinity SGLT1 is not confined to one particular organ or tissue type, that of high-capacity, but low-affinity SGLT2 is almost exclusively limited to the epithelium of the proximal tubule, responsible for the reabsorption of urinary glucose. Importantly, among healthy individuals, nearly 100% of the glucose that is filtered by the renal glomerulus is subsequently reabsorbed. However, when plasma glucose levels exceed a certain threshold (∼180 mg/dL or 10 mmol/L), glucose reabsorption capacity declines, while urinary glucose excretion increases.
European Medicines Agency (EMA)- and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved SGLT2i such as canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin share important pharmacokinetic characteristics, namely, rapid oral absorption, long half-life (allowing once-daily administration), wide hepatic metabolism (mainly via glucuronidation to inactive metabolites) and, most importantly, few clinically relevant drug–drug interactions (except an increased risk of hypoglycaemia with concomitant administration with insulin and/or sulphonylureas). Placebo-controlled studies in patients with T2D demonstrated a consistent, albeit modest glucose-lowering effect of SGLT2i compared to other glucose-lowering agents, including sulfonylureas and GLP1-RA, with a relative reduction in HbA1c levels of 0.6% up to 1.0% over 12–78 weeks and attenuated efficacy in patients with CKD. Specifically, comparative reports with sulfonylureas (i.e. glimepiride and glipizide) are not always consistent and suggest different effects for different molecules with empagliflozin and canagliflozin showing higher efficacy. Whilst GLP-1Ras such as semaglutide show a higher glucose-lowering effect with a mean difference in HbA1c% levels of up to 0.6% at 26 months compared to SGLT2i., Finally, gliflozins achieve comparable HbA1c% reductions relative to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors. Major side-effects observed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) include female genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections (including urosepsis and pyelonephritis), nausea, constipation, and ketoacidosis.
Experimental evidence of their cardiovascular benefits
Gliflozins’ actions involve cellular and molecular mechanisms at vascular, renal, cardiac, and systemic levels, with their cardiorenal effects most prominently contributing to their CV benefits. While some are related to the prime action of SGLT2 on renal tubules, gliflozins exert effects that act independently of this pathway. In support of this notion, empagliflozin exerts cardioprotective effects in mice deprived of renal SGLT2 expression. To disentangle the key mechanisms by which SGLT2i confer CV/-renal benefits, we herein provide a streamlined overview of their mechanism of action, focusing on cardiac, renal, vascular, and systemic levels, between which a strong interplay exists.
Vascular effects
A large body of experimental evidence suggests that SGLT2i exert vasculoprotective effects involving mechanisms that may act independently of their glucose-lowering properties (Figure 1). The beneficial effects of gliflozins on endothelial function are mediated by (i) increased nitric oxide (NO) availability, (ii) reduced oxidative stress, (iii) alleviated microvascular dysfunction, (iv) preserved mitochondrial function, (v) reduced inflammation, and (vi) reinstalled energy homeostasis. These mechanisms are closely intertwined with each other; thus, the relevance of these key mechanism towards clinical benefit is, at present, difficult to judge. Yet, their regulatory properties on both mitochondrial function and cellular energy homeostasis might be of particular relevance in driving their CV benefits.
NO-mediated attenuation of oxidative stress
NO is the most potent mediator of endothelial homeostasis and critically regulated by SGLT2i. Indeed, in vascular cells, SGLT2i increase adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity and enhance endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) phosphorylation at Ser1177 site with direct effects on vascular function. While angiotensin II induces SGLT2 expression in mice and accelerates oxidative stress involving nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activation,, empagliflozin suppresses activation of NADPH oxidase thus protecting against oxidative stress and in turn endothelial senescence and dysfunction., Moreover, empagliflozin may reduce the levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate(cGMP)-dependent kinase (cGK-I), a negative regulator of the effect of NO that contributes to vascular dysfunction., While canagliflozin exhibits similar pro-NO effects, these were intriguingly mainly driven by NOX2- and NOX4-mediated mechanisms. The aforementioned effects directly relate to improved vasorelaxation in several animal models of impaired vascular function.
The link between NO bioavailability and oxidative stress has been reviewed elsewhere. Briefly, NO bioavailability also directly depends on oxidative stress as NO and O2− rapidly interact to form the toxic peroxynitrate. Downstream effectors of Ang II, SGLT1-, and 2 exert significant pro-oxidative effects in the vasculature. Consequently, both empagliflozin and dapagliflozin protect the endothelium from intracellular ROS production and in turn improve NO bioavailability, mainly mediated by increased levels of antioxidants such as glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase., More recently, STAT-3 pathway activation and increased Y(705)STAT-3 dimers together with Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE) 1 and NADPH oxidase have been discussed as possible mediators of their beneficial effect on intracellular ROS production.,
Preservation of mitochondrial function
Mitochondria sense environmental stress and mediate cellular adaptation by modulating energy production and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation (thereby looping back to the mechanisms outlined above) with direct effects on endothelial growth, proliferation, and senescence.
Of interest, SGLT2i are thought to prevent mitochondrial DNA damage by modulating the physiological process of mitochondrial fission by restoring the AMP-to-adenosine triphosphate (ATP) ratio, increasing AMPK activation and reducing Drp1 phosphorylation. Also, by improving energy production they preserve respiratory chain function, stabilize their membrane potential, reduce ROS synthesis, and the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (PTP) channels with direct effect on cell viability. Reduced levels of oxidative stress preserve mitochondrial DNA and reduce mitochondrial fission 1 (Fis1) protein activation, again modulating mitochondrial fission. Also, dapagliflozin was reported to facilitate the opposite mechanism of mitochondrial fusion by upregulating Opa1 and Mfn2.
Furthermore, SGLT2i were shown to maintain autophagic flux (i.e. a measure of autophagic degradation activity) and promote mitochondrial health. Importantly, aberrant autophagic flux is implicated into the build-up of atherosclerotic plaques,, with both empagliflozin and dapagliflozin enhancing autophagy in cardiometabolic disease models via the activation of nutrient-sensing pathways such as the mTOR, sirtuin1 (SIRT1), and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIS) pathway.
Alleviation of microvascular dysfunction
Coronary microvascular dysfunction encompasses structural and functional alterations perturbing coronary microcirculation homeostasis, thus contributing importantly to the pathogenesis of several forms of HF, including HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In this regard, it is noteworthy that gliflozins emerged as alleviators of microvascular dysfunction during several conditions, including diabetic and pro-inflammatory states,, reviewed in detail by Dimitriadis et al. For instance, in ob/ob−/− mice, empagliflozin-mediated SGLT2 inhibition over 10 weeks improved coronary microvascular function reflecting into improved cardiac contractile performance. Similarly, Juni et al. have shown that empagliflozin alleviates microvascular dysfunction by reinstating endothelial NO delivery through reduced tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α-induced ROS accumulation, thereby positively influencing cardiomyocyte contraction and relaxation. In line, in an in vitro model of CKD, empagliflozin restored microvascular endothelial NO-dependent cardiomyocyte function upon exposure to uraemic serum. Collectively, these experimental data highlight the interaction of the endothelium and myocardium, with SGLT2i likely exerting their beneficial effects on cardiac function involving, at least in part, endothelium-dependent mechanisms, as outlined above.
Inhibition of inflammation
SGLT2i show anti-inflammatory properties. Indeed, treatment with gliflozins reduced the activation of NF-kB transcription factor in several models of cardiometabolic diseases with reduced levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), TNFα, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.,, Also, SGLT2 reduced the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, P-, and E-selectin with reduced inflammatory cell recruitment and activation., (Figure 2). By doing so, SGLT2i improve endothelial integrity and barrier function.
Given the association between endothelial inflammation and production of prothrombotic factors such as tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), different experimental studies investigated a potential role for gliflozins in mediating arterial thrombosis, a dreadful but common complication of atherosclerosis. While a small pilot study yielded promising results, we have previously shown their neutral effects on arterial thrombus formation, a finding that is in line with landmark trials.,
Restoration of energy homeostasis
The beneficial metabolic effects of SGLT2i also include reduced insulin resistance, a common denominator of cardiometabolic diseases. Importantly, owing to increased urinary glucose excretion, SGLT2i administration triggers a loss of ∼200–250 kcal per day. This leads to a decline in both visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, with preservation of lean tissue mass and a loss of extracellular fluid, though only transiently. In line, RCTs report a reduction of about 2 kg as compared to placebo,, an effect that notably plateaus after 6 months. Mechanisms causing bodyweight reduction differ between SGLT2i and GLP-1RA, as the latter promote mainly satiety and fullness due to delayed gastric emptying thereby reducing calorie intake.
Gliflozins promote oxidation of both glucose and long fatty acids independently of insulin levels with a modest increase in ketone body production (as reflected by higher plasma levels),, with this metabolic shift likely representing an important contributor to their CV benefits. Furthermore, SGLT2i modulate extracellular volume, an effect likely mediated only partially by their natriuretic and glycosuric effects as their increase in diuresis is transient. Inhibition of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and subsequent blood pressure reduction, body weight reduction, improved glycaemic control, and vascular function are overall, mechanisms acting in longer term which might explain this effect., Also, by increasing glycosuria, SGLT2i reduce urate absorption in the proximal convoluted tubule, leading to a persistent reduction of circulating uric acid. Notably, uric acid is pro-inflammatory (e.g. activation NLRP3 among others), it fosters fibrosis within the vascular wall, increases apoptosis of endothelial cells, and eventually depletes endothelial NO levels. Nonetheless, the causal role of urate as a modulator of CV outcomes is still heavily debated. Indeed, the association between genetic markers of hyperuricaemia and CV outcomes is only weak in magnitude with allopurinol showing neutral effects on CV outcomes in the large ALL-HEART study.
Renal effects
These vasculoprotective roles are of fundamental relevance for the understanding of SGLT2i-mediated renoprotection. Indeed, renovascular oxidative stress drives the initiation and progression of CKD with more recent evidence implicating the proximal tubule in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy., Accordingly, SGLT2 expression is mainly confined to proximal tubular cells, a cell population rich in mitochondria and centrally involved in ROS production. At the renal level, preclinical studies reported that SGLT2 inhibition may be linked to reduced synthesis of pro-inflammatory and -fibrotic mediators (TNFR1, IL-6, MMP7, and FN1), blunted expression of deleterious toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) and attenuated activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) culminating in an overall anti-fibrotic effect. Mechanistically, human proximal tubular epithelial cells treated with SGLT2i showed reduced collagen IV and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression, but an increase in protective STAT1 and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1). Furthermore, renoprotective effects of gliflozins also include a reduction in volume overload, lower intraglomerular blood pressure due to tubule-glomerular feedback modulation as well as reduced sympathetic and RAAS activation with subsequent natriuresis. Indeed, SGLT2i exert natriuretic effects through NHE3 inhibition, a protein displaying structural overlaps with SGLT2., NHE3 is mainly expressed on the apical surface of renal epithelial cells, where it regulates sodium reuptake following glomerular filtration., With NHE3 being upregulated by RAAS hyperactivation in patients with HF and T2D, renoprotective effects of SGLT2i are thought to be, at least in part, NHE-dependent. Yet, as noted above, their natriuretic and volume depletion effects occur transiently without resulting in neurohormonal activation, kidney dysfunction, or electrolyte abnormalities as observed with loop diuretics. Bourlaug and Testani recently suggested that, differently from traditional diuretics, SGLT2i’ effect on plasma volume occurs due to an adjustment in the volume setpoint definition facilitating increased diuresis in hypervolemic patients only. This elegant concept implies that the mechanism depends on the location of SGLT2 in the proximal tubule, resulting in increased delivery of salt-rich fluid at the level of the macula densa with suppressed RAAS activation thus driving increased Na+ and water reabsorption when needed in the remaining parts of the nephron.
Finally, SGLT2i are associated with increased haematocrit values, an effect that is partially due to their diuretic properties but also relates to enhanced erythropoiesis. How SGLT2i increase red blood cell production remains to be fully delineated. Among the different hypotheses, SGLT2i may (i) rejuvenate erythropoietin-producing cells by increasing renal oxygenation, (ii) cause localized hypoxia at the tubule stimulating erythropoietin production, (iii) increase iron utilization through hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-2α; or (iv) enhanced erythropoietin gene transcription by increased SIRT1.
From systemic effects towards cardioprotection
Most of the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2i on cardiac structure and function are mediated by their systemic haemodynamic and metabolic effects. Indeed, vascular effects are related to blood pressure reduction by osmotic diuresis and natriuresis, attenuation of arterial stiffness as well as improved endothelial function. Moreover, body weight reduction and a decline in total plasma volume by increased glucose excretion and enhanced erythropoiesis contribute to improved cardiac output., In the failing heart, compromised energy and redox balance along with perturbations of ion regulatory mechanisms occur early during the disease process, through which myocardial remodelling and contractile dysfunction are promoted. Dysfunctional mitochondria lead to compromised energy and redox balance fostering contractile dysfunction and apoptotic cell death of cardiomyocytes., Increased NADPH oxidase activity and advanced glycation end products (AGEs) generation are principal causes of oxidative stress in myocardial cells of T2D patients. SGLT2i counteract oxidative stress, induce M2 macrophage polarization and reduce TGF-β production thereby blunting progression of myocardial fibrosis., A clinical study is presently exploring whether this translates into improved myocardial strain, fibrosis, and inflammation as assessed by cardiac MRI (NCT03782259). Other anti-inflammatory effects may be mediated by reduction of epicardial adipose tissue, changes of apolipoproteins profile (i.e. increase of LDL and HDL and decrease of triglycerides), and amelioration of liver steatosis. Failing cardiomyocytes also exhibit altered cellular energy sensor function as evidenced by compromised AMPK function,, collectively driving the transition towards a catabolic phenotype involving increased glucose uptake and accelerated glycolysis., By increasing pancreatic glucagon release and suppressing insulin (although this finding is controversial and has not been consistently replicated in all studies), SGLT2i might also increase ketone bodies production which are well-known alternative energy sources in failing hearts.,, Mechanistically, this may explain the higher risk of euglycemic ketoacidosis reported in some clinical studies.
Importantly, ion channel regulating mechanisms sit at the crossroads of housekeeping mechanisms, myocardial remodelling, and contractile (dys-)function and thus may open novel exciting therapeutic avenues., In this regard it is interesting to note that SGLT2i improve myocardial Ca2+ homeostasis by modulating the activity of cardiac-specific NHE1 and in turn mitochondrial respiration, thereby blunting the decline in contractility. (Figure 3) Also, in cardiomyocytes, SGLT2i may facilitate contraction and relaxation cycles by blunting the late inward sodium current and calcium–calmodulin–dependent protein kinase II. Moreover, SGLT2i share characteristics of caloric restriction mimetics not only through their induction of glucosuria, but also by modulating cellular energy sensors such as AMPK and sirtuins.,, This is of particular relevance since AMPK activation mitigates oxidative stress, blunts pro-inflammatory signalling, and confers resilience to cellular stress, thus exerting beneficial metabolic effects. The beneficial metabolic reprogramming provided by SGLT2i at cardiorenal levels has been recently reviewed elsewhere. At the functional level, enhanced activity of the AMPK pathway attenuates HF-related phenotypes, while regulating vascular tone via suppression of inflammatory signalling. Importantly, cardioprotective effects of SGLT2i following hypoxia/reoxygenation injury were also reported, independently of the presence or absence of diabetes and exposure to different AGE concentrations. A recent meta-analysis of preclinical studies provided evidence that SGLT2i have the potential to reduce myocardial infarct size (by 33% in infarct size/area at risk), independently of the presence of diabetes. Of interest, the heart-sparing effect of empagliflozin in the context of myocardial infarction may be at least in part independent of SGLT2 effects as shown in mice lacking this protein by isolated Langendorff-perfused heart model. In addition, empagliflozin proved effective in ameliorating adverse cardiac remodelling in a nondiabetic porcine model of HF predominantly by reinstating myocardial energetics, blunting histological and molecular abnormalities of cardiac remodelling, improving systolic and diastolic function and reducing left ventricle (LV) stiffness.
Clinical evidence across the spectrum of CV diseases
Innovative RCTs made substantial contributions to our understanding of the CV benefits of SGLT2i in T2D, HF, CKD, and beyond. Although initially developed and approved for their glucose-lowering effects, SGLT2i are increasingly prescribed due to their CV/-renal benefits, with glucose-lowering deemed to represent a beneficial side-effect.
Gliflozins and CV outcomes
Contemporary meta-analyses suggest that SGLT2i reduce HF hospitalizations and reduce the risk of worsening renal function ameliorating renal outcomes in patients with T2D and/or HF., DECLARE-TIMI 58, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, and CANVAS Program demonstrated the superiority of empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin vs. placebo in patients with T2D, CV risk factors or established atherosclerotic disease (ASCVD) (Table 1). Among recruited patients, the mean age was roughly 65 years, 1/3 were females, 10% with HFrEF and 25% with CKD (only 7.4% in DECLARE-TIMI 58). Median follow-up ranged from 2.4 years in CANVAS to 4.2 years in DECLARE-TIMI 58. The primary endpoint was a three-point MACE (composite of CV death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and non-fatal stroke) while additional endpoints comprised hospitalization for HF (co-primary in DECLARE-TIMI 58). SGLT2 inhibition is associated with a relative risk (RR) reduction of 14%, mainly driven by a dramatic reduction in hospitalizations for HF (RR of 24%). Of note, only empagliflozin provided a significant reduction in CV death (RR of 38%), with neutral effects being observed for non-fatal AMI and non-fatal stroke. Two additional trials added important evidence for the efficacy of SGLT2i in T2D, namely the VERTIS CV and CREDENCE trials., VERTIS CV evaluated ertugliflozin vs. placebo for the three-point MACE showing a benefit for HF hospitalization (RR −30%). The CREDENCE trial enrolled patients with T2D-related CKD. Although the incidence of MACE or hospitalization for HF were not primary outcomes, a robust attenuation of both was detected (RR −20% and −39%, respectively). Notably, in this selected population, canagliflozin effectively reduced CV death, even if only borderline significant [hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61–1.00; P = 0.05].
Based on encouraging data, the large DAPA-HF and EMPA-reduced trials were initiated in patients with or without T2D. With 4700 patients, DAPA-HF was the third largest study performed in the setting of HFrEF after PARADIGM-HF and SHIFT. Most recruited patients were in NYHA class II at the time of recruitment, with severe left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction (31% ± 6.7) and presence of ischaemic heart disease (57% of the total). Nearly half of patients had T2D at least one recovery for HF in their medical history. At baseline, all patients received guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Dapagliflozin conferred an RR reduction of 26% as regards the primary outcome (the composite of CV death, recovery for HF, and urgent visit for worsening of HF) irrespective of the presence or absence of T2D, with a number needed to treat of 21. Shortly thereafter, with a similar design EMPEROR-Reduced presented the efficacy of empagliflozin in more advanced HFrEF patients with a mean age was 67 years, 3/4 in NYHA class II with a mean LVEF of 27%., Indeed, patients recruited had to be hospitalized for HF within 12 months, with higher levels of natriuretic peptides (doubled if concomitant atrial fibrillation). The primary outcome, CV death or HF hospitalization was reduced by 25% in the empagliflozin-treated arm. Yet, in contrast to dapagliflozin, empagliflozin failed to reduce CV death in HFrEF. Finally, the above-noted effects were independent of LVEF and T2D. Based on the results obtained in these landmark RCTs (Table 2) SGLT2i received an IA recommendation for the management of HFrEF patients.
The impressive results in the setting of HFrEF led to the design of innovative RCTs to test their efficacy in patients with HFpEF, a syndrome that was still lacking an effective medical therapy., Encouraging results were provided by EMPEROR-Preserved, in which older patients with LVEF >40% on baseline GDMT and a history of HF hospitalization within 12 months and NT-proBNP ≥300 pg/mL (or >900 pg/mL in presence of AF) were enrolled. The great majority was in NYHA class II with a mean LVEF of 54%. Nearly half had a diagnosis of T2D, AF, or CKD. In patients randomized to SGLT2i, a reduction of the primary outcome (composite of CV death or HF hospitalization) of 21% was observed, mainly driven by a 29% reduction of HF hospitalizations but with no significant benefit on CV death. Interestingly, the most prominent effect was observed in patients with LVEF ranging between 40 and 50%, a condition defined as HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF)., In those with an LVEF of ≥50 to <60% a borderline effect within a confidence interval of 0.64–0.99 was observed, while no effect was noted in those with a LVEF exceeding 60%. More recently, the DELIVER trial tested dapagliflozin specifically in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF (LVEF ≥40%) over 2.3 years. Notably, this trial was the first to enrol also patients with HF with improved LVEF (HFimpEF), defined as HF with previously reduced LVEF of ≤40%. Overall, patients were mainly in NYHA class II with a median LVEF of 54% and hypertension and T2D as main comorbidities (89 and 44%, respectively). Dapagliflozin reduced the primary outcome (composite of worsening HF or CV death) by 18% (HR 0.82; 95%CI, 0.73–0.92). Yet, such reduction was mainly driven by the prevention of HF worsening (unplanned hospitalization for HF or an urgent visit for HF), while CV death, although lower in dapagliflozin arm (7.4 vs. 8.3%), did not reach statistical significance. Of interest, such results held true independent of LVEF and diabetes. Importantly, in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), a patient-level meta-analysis of DAPA-HF and DELIVER showed dapagliflozin to be highly effective in preventing worsening HF and CV death without increasing the risk of amputation as previously reported in the CANVAS trial. In both trials, the clinical benefits of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF occurred independent of the type and dosage of diuretics with a good safety profile allowing for a reduction of loop diuretic use over time., Based on these findings, EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER opened a new era for SGLT2i in HFmrEF and HFpEF as the first effective drug class for the treatment of these conditions.
Two more recent RCTs tested the combined SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitor sotagliflozin in individuals with T2D, i.e. SOLOIST-WHF and SCORED. In SOLOIST-WHF, sotagliflozin improved clinical outcomes in patients with T2D after an episode of decompensated HF independently of the presence or absence of HFrEF or HFpEF. Yet, this trial was not specifically designed to test HF population and recruited a moderate number of patients with this condition. In SCORED, sotagliflozin reduced the risk of CV death, HF hospitalization, or urgent visit for HF by 26%. Unfortunately, both trials were terminated prematurely due to loss of funding at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the number of HF patients constraining a subgroup analysis. However, a pooled analysis of both trials showed that sotagliflozin administration resulted in a significant reduction of CV death, hospitalization, or an urgent visit for HF, irrespective of LVEF over 9 to 16 months. In a subgroup analysis, patients with an LVEF of ≤40% experienced a 22% risk reduction, while patients with LVEF between 40 and 50% and patients with HFpEF showed a risk reduction of 43 and 33%, respectively. Based on the above, sotagliflozin recently received FDA approval for treatment of patients with HF independently of their LVEF.
One more smaller trial, i.e. EMPULSE recruited 530 patients with acute decompensated HF across the spectrum of LVEF that were randomized to empagliflozin or placebo, respectively. The primary analysis was based on the stratified win-ratio, focussing on the composite of death, number of events, time to first HF event, and change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) from baseline to 90 days. Of note, clinical benefit was 14% higher in the empagliflozin group compared to the placebo arm. Notably, empagliflozin was also associated with fewer deaths and improvements in the quality of life.
Although not among the primary endpoints of EMPEROR-Preserved, DELIVER, and SOLOIST-WHF, consistent, time-dependent improvements in symptoms of HF as measured by KCCQ were provided by SGLTi. The primary endpoint of PRESERVED-HF, CHIEF-HF, and EMPERIAL-preserved trials,, focused on improvement of HF symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function in patients with HFpEF, both with or without T2D. In PRESERVED-HF the study population was older (mean age 69 years), the majority was in NYHA II, and around 50% had AF and/or T2D. The mean LVEF was 60% while mean NT-proBNP was 430 pg/mL (830 pg/mL in the presence of AF). In CHIEF-HF the mean age was 64 years, 1/3 were T2D with 40% having HFrEF. The primary outcome of both RCTs was the change in the KCCQ-TSS, although the study duration differed, with 3 and 12 months for CHIEF-HF and PRESERVED-HF, respectively. SGLT2i significantly improved quality of life at the end of the study period. In CHIEF-HF a reduction of 4.3 points vs. placebo irrespective of the type of HF or the presence of T2D was observed. Similarly, in PRESERVED-HF, KCCQ was reduced by six points. EMPERIAL-Preserved enrolled 315 patients with or without T2D and randomized them to empagliflozin or placebo for 12 weeks; however, the primary endpoint (6-min walk test distance change to week 12) did not differ between groups. Similarly, also in EMPERIAL-Reduced, empagliflozin did not provide substantial changes in 6-min walk test distance in patients with HFrEF.
In aggregate, most recent meta-analyses of the RCTs discussed above provide strong evidence of the efficacy of SGLT2i in preventing CV disease-related endpoints in patients with T2D and ability to reduce overall CV mortality by 15%. This effect is particularly evident in patients with ASCVD where CV death is reduced by 17%, while prevention of HF hospitalization (RR—30%) is consistently observed irrespective of ASCVD. A recent metanalysis in patients with HFrEF enrolled in DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced reported a reduction in CV death of 14% and of a first hospitalization for HF by 31%. Importantly, the composite outcome of CV death and HF hospitalization was reduced by 25% irrespective of the presence or absence of T2D. These beneficial effects remained robust despite different baseline characteristics such as age (absence of benefit only in those <55 years), sex, race, eGFR, NYHA class (major effects if NYHA II), history of HF hospitalization, or use of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI). As for patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, a recent meta-analysis including data from DELIVER and EMPEROR-preserved showed a robust reduction of composite CV death or first hospitalization for HF [HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.73–0.87)]. The same meta-analysis then included also data from DAPA-HF, EMPEROR-reduced, and SOLOIST-WHF to provide appropriate statistical power. When analysed together, the five trials further proved the efficacy of SGLT2i in preventing the risk of hospitalization for HF, extending survival, and improving overall health status. Such clinical benefits were consistent among 14 subgroups including age, sex, region, LVEF, T2D, kidney function, and body mass index. In contrast to other HF drugs, SGLT2i show an unusually rapid onset of action on clinical endpoints. Thus, together with the result of the STRONG-HF trial showing the safety and efficacy of a rapid up-titration of HF guideline-recommended therapies (yet without gliflozins), SGLT2i should be part of HFrEF therapy as soon as the diagnosis has been established.
SGLT2i in chronic kidney disease
When SGLT2i were first approved, the product label included warnings or even contraindications for their use in patients with reduced eGFR. Yet, consistent renoprotective effects were since observed in more recent trials with high-level evidence supporting their use in CKD. Surprisingly, their beneficial effects seem to be consistent in HF patients with CKD independently of the degree of renal impairment. T2D-related structural and functional alterations of the vascular endothelium, eventually leading to micro-albuminuria, are important contributors to adverse cardiorenal outcomes., Notably, SGLT2i consistently reduce albuminuria, attenuate the transition from micro-albuminuria to macro-albuminuria, and halt worsening renal function and thus the transition to ESRD, effects that act largely independent of changes in blood pressure, body weight, or HbA1c., In a prespecified analysis of the DAPA-CKD trial dapagliflozin increased the likelihood of regression to normo- or micro-albuminuria (with a 30% reduction of albuminuria after 2 weeks) and reduced the likelihood of progression to a high-degree albuminuria. As expected, patients with T2D showed greater benefit as compared to normoglycemic ones. Yet, the effects of SGLT2i were consistent across the spectrum of baseline eGFR and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR). Indeed, RCT-derived data suggest that SGLT2i blunt the development of ESRD, slow the decline in eGFR and reduce the risk of renal death while leading to an increase in erythropoietin production.
Only few RCTs with SGLT2i explored renal outcomes as the primary endpoint (Table 3). In a meta-analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS Program and DECLARE-TIMI 58 trials including a relatively heterogeneous study population in terms of eGFR (eGFR < 60 mL/min: 25.9% in EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 20.1% in CANVAS, and 7.4% in DECLARE-TIMI 58), SGLT2i consistently conferred renoprotective effects. The overall reduction of the composite endpoint of worsening renal function, ESRD, or renal death was 45% [HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.48–0.64)]. This effect was similar both in patients with and without ASCVD (44 vs. 46%), while depending on baseline eGFR with greater benefit in patients with preserved compared to those with reduced renal function.
In a meta-analysis of DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced, the risk of the composite renal outcome (i.e. chronic dialysis, renal transplantation, or a ≥ 50% sustained reduction of eGFR) was significantly lower with SGLT2i, but to a lesser degree in the presence of CKD (23 vs. 27%, respectively). Of interest, changes in eGFR over time were similar in both trials. However, it must be noted that compared with those enrolled in DAPA-HF, patients included in EMPEROR-Reduced had consistently lower LVEF (27 vs. 31%, respectively), higher levels of natriuretic peptides, lower eGFR, and were more likely to have been treated with ARNI at baseline (20 vs. 11%, respectively). Very recently, another meta-analysis investigated the potential renoprotective effects of SGLT2i in 90 409 patients of 13 trials, further supporting the protective effect of SGLT2i with a 37% risk reduction of CKD progression, irrespective of the presence of T2D.
Potential renoprotective effects of SGLT2i among patients with HFpEF were hitherto inconsistent; indeed, no significant differences were observed in EMPEROR-Preserved with respect to renal outcomes. Similarly, a prespecified analysis of the DELIVER trial, while confirming the beneficial effect of dapagliflozin independently of baseline kidney function, did not show any effect of the drug on the renal composite outcome (an overall low event rate should be considered). However, dapagliflozin reduced the rate of decline in eGFR as compared with placebo.
The CREDENCE trial recruited patients with T2D-related CKD with an estimated eGFR of 30 to <90 mL/min, a ratio of albumin to creatinine (UACR) exceeding 300 mg/g. The primary outcome was a composite of ESRD (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of <15 mL/min), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or CV causes. The trial was stopped early after a median of 2.6 years due to overwhelming benefit (−30% RR reduction of the primary outcome in the canagliflozin arm), with beneficial effects being noted irrespective of baseline HbA1c.
Although there seems to be a clear benefit of SGLT2i in improving cardiorenal outcomes among individuals with T2D, data from euglycemic population were scarce. DAPA-CKD aimed to fill this gap by enrolling patients with an eGFR 25–75 mL/min. and UACR of 200–5000 mg/g. Similar to CREDENCE, the trial was stopped early after 2.4 years when an interim analysis showed a clear benefit of dapagliflozin with an RR reduction of 39% of the primary outcome (i.e. composite of a sustained decline in the eGFR of at least 50%, ESRD, or death from renal or CV causes). The beneficial effects of dapagliflozin were again independent of the presence or absence of T2D, with a reduction in the mortality risk of 31% in the dapagliflozin group. Also, a recent post-hoc analysis of DAPA-CKD showed that treatment with dapagliflozin reduces anaemia and anaemia risk in patients with CKD independently of T2D. Finally, the largest phase III trial evaluating the effects of empagliflozin in adults with CKD independently from T2D (EMPA-KIDNEY) was stopped early due to an overwhelming renoprotective effect compared to placebo. In this trial, recruited patients had to be on GDMT with RAAS inhibitors and a eGFR between 20 and 45 mL/min or between 45 and 90 mL/min with UACR ≥200 mg/g (or protein/creatinine ratio ≥300 mg/g). After 2 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint (i.e. a composite progression of kidney disease or death from CV causes) was met by 13.1% of patients in the empagliflozin arm and by 16.9% of those allocated to placebo (HR 0.72; 95%CI 0.64 to 0.82). Results were independent of T2D and consistent among subgroups defined according to eGFR ranges.
Gliflozins in myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and cerebrovascular diseases
Hitherto, limited evidence exists on the effects of SGLT2i on myocardial infarction (MI)-related outcomes. The EMMY trial was among the first to assess whether empagliflozin in addition to guideline-recommended post-MI therapy leads to a larger decline in N-terminal pro-hormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and improvement in LVEF. Interestingly, among those receiving the active drug, a greater NT-proBNP reduction over 26 weeks together with improvements in cardiac structure and function were observed. These results are in line with observations in patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) showing a reduced cumulative incidence of MACE, HF, non-fatal MI, and unplanned repeat revascularization when patients were treated with dapagliflozin for other reasons. In November 2023 results of DAPA-MI, the first trial exploring the effect of dapagliflozin in addition to standard of care in patients with acute MI (and no T2DM), were made public. In this landmark trial, patients were randomly assigned to receiving placebo or dapagliflozin within 10 days from MI and impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function or presence of Q-waves. The primary outcome (hierarchical composite of death, HF hospitalization, non-fatal MI, atrial fibrillation/flutter event, T2DM, New York Heart Association class IV?, weight decrease of ≥5%) was reached with a win-ratio of 1.34 (95%CI 1.20–1.50, P < 0.001). Interestingly, dapagliflozin-mediated clinical benefits were mainly driven by metabolic (T2DM and weight loss) rather than direct CV effects. Further results are expected soon from EMPACT-MI (NCT04509674), analysing the effect of empagliflozin in patients with acute MI and enrolling a slightly different patient population (including patients with T2DM and extending the enrolling period up to 14 days after MI). Furthermore, the primary endpoint of the ongoing EMPACT-MI trial differs markedly from that of DAPA-MI (i.e. composite one of the times to first HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality).
Patients with CV disease or T2D are prone to develop AF. Early preclinical evidence suggests a potential role for SGLT2i in preventing supraventricular arrhythmias with the underlying mechanisms still to be defined. Two recent meta-analyses comprising >30 studies support a reduction in AF risk of 19% and a 25% lower risk of serious AF-related events with SGLT2i., Such an effect appears to be particularly pronounced for dapagliflozin. In line, a recent post-hoc analysis of DECLARE-TIMI-58 showed beneficial effects of dapagliflozin on the incidence of AF with an RR reduction of 29%. Yet, a recent meta-analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME, DECLARE-TIMI 58, CANVAS Program, and CREDENCE found no clear effect of SGLT2i on cerebrovascular events; however, there was some benefits as it relates to haemorrhagic stroke and AF, as well as total stroke for those reduced eGFR. When interpreting such results one should bear in mind that none of the RCTs on SGLT2i available to date was designed to investigate AF-related outcomes. Furthermore, AF occurrence is not routinely reported in the primary analysis of most SGLT2i RCTs, often lacking follow-up data on electrocardiograms. Indeed, most trials only report AF events meeting the criteria for serious adverse events; as a result, available RCTs showed a lower than that expected AF event rate in such a high-risk population compared to real-world data. A specific trial on dapagliflozin (DAPA-AF; NCT04792190) is designed to investigate the effect of the drug on AF burden are expected to provide new evidence.
Patients with established CV diseases or a diagnosis of T2D are at high risk of ischaemic stroke. However, with stroke being a relatively rare event coupled with the relatively short observation periods, most RCTs were inconclusive when it comes to the effects of SGLT2i on stroke-related outcomes. Nonetheless, previous meta-analyses suggest that SGLT2i may have a neutral effect on the risk of stroke in patients with T2D. A more recent meta-analysis discerning the effects on the different stroke subtypes reported a possible beneficial effect on haemorrhagic stroke over placebo, which might be related to blood pressure reduction provided by SGLT2i. Yet, due to the low number of events such findings warrant confirmation in well-designed RCTs.
Future perspectives and conclusions
Gliflozins had a remarkable impact on the management of both T2D and its clinical sequalae. Indeed, SGLT2i represent the first antidiabetic drug class shown to effectively reduce HF hospitalizations, CV death, and worsening kidney function in specific patient populations. Their CV benefits as well as the underpinning mechanisms are multifaceted, with their cardioprotective effects acting independently of their glucose-lowering properties thereby providing beneficial effects beyond glycaemic control. While their CV benefits involve cellular and molecular mechanisms at systemic, vascular, cardiac, and renal levels, their cardiorenal effects appear to contribute to their clinical benefits most prominently. As data on their protective effects irrespective of LVEF are accumulating, international societies have recently expanded their recommended use to the entire spectrum of HF. With roughly 50 phase III RCTs presently ongoing (clinicaltrials.gov; accessed on 19 December 2023; Table 4), SGLT2i—also referred to as ‘statins of the 21st century’—are likely to assume additional applications in different fields and medical conditions in the near future. Potential beneficial effects of gliflozins in patients with acute HF, atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, cardiogenic shock, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, among others, are currently being investigated. Beyond cardiology, other disciplines including nephrology (eg, CKD) and hepatology (eg, non-alcoholic fatty disease) may benefit from the rigorous study of this class of drugs at both experimental and clinical levels.
References 204
- 1.
Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103:137–149.
Not in our library10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002
- 2.
Liu L, Simon B, Shi J, Mallhi AK, Eisen HJ. Impact of diabetes mellitus on risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: evidence on health outcomes and antidiabetic treatment in United States adults. World J Diabetes 2016;7:449–461.
Not in our library10.4239/wjd.v7.i18.449
- 3.
Wang CCL, Hess CN, Hiatt WR, Goldfine AB. Clinical update: cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2016;133:2459–2502.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.116.022194
- 4.
Anders H-J, Huber TB, Isermann B, Schiffer M. CKD in diabetes: diabetic kidney disease versus nondiabetic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2018;14:361–377.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-018-0001-y
- 5.
Marx N, Federici M, Schutt K, Muller-Wieland D, Ajjan RA, Antunes MJ, Christodorescu RM, Crawford C, Di Angelantonio E, Eliasson B, Espinola-Klein C, Fauchier L, Halle M, Herrington WG, Kautzky-Willer A, Lambrinou E, Lesiak M, Lettino M, McGuire DK, Mullens W, Rocca B, Sattar N; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. Eur Heart J 2023;44:4043–4140.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehad192
- 6.
Dave CV, Schneeweiss S, Wexler DJ, Brill G, Patorno E. Trends in clinical characteristics and prescribing preferences for SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, 2013–2018. Diabetes Care 2020;43:921–924.
Not in our library10.2337/dc19-1943
- 7.
Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Brueckmann M, Ofstad AP, Pfarr E, Jamal W, Packer M. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet 2020;396:819–829.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31824-9
- 8.
Vaduganathan M, Docherty KF, Claggett BL, Jhund PS, de Boer RA, Hernandez AF, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Lam CSP, Martinez F, Shah SJ, Desai AS, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD. SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a comprehensive meta-analysis of five randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2022;400:757–767.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01429-5
- 9.
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Bohm M, Burri H, Butler J, Celutkiene J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3599–3726.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368
- 10.
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Bohm M, Burri H, Butler J, Celutkiene J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Skibelund AK; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2023;44:3627–3639.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195
- 11.
Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, Fang JC, Fedson SE, Fonarow GC, Hayek SS, Hernandez AF, Khazanie P, Kittleson MM, Lee CS, Link MS, Milano CA, Nnacheta LC, Sandhu AT, Stevenson LW, Vardeny O, Vest AR, Yancy CW. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022;145:e895–e1032.
Not in our library10.1161/cir.0000000000001063
- 12.
Vallon V. The mechanisms and therapeutic potential of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetes mellitus. Annu Rev Med 2015;66:255–270.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-med-051013-110046
- 13.
Navale AM, Paranjape AN. Glucose transporters: physiological and pathological roles. Biophys Rev 2016;8:5–9.
Not in our library10.1007/s12551-015-0186-2
- 14.
Ehrenkranz JR, Lewis NG, Kahn CR, Roth J. Phlorizin: a review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2005;21:31–38.
Not in our library10.1002/dmrr.532
- 15.
Nauck MA. Update on developments with SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes. Drug Des Devel Ther 2014;8:1335–1380.
Not in our library10.2147/dddt.s50773
- 16.
Rossetti L, Smith D, Shulman GI, Papachristou D, DeFronzo RA. Correction of hyperglycemia with phlorizin normalizes tissue sensitivity to insulin in diabetic rats. J Clin Invest 1987;79:1510–1515.
Not in our library10.1172/jci112981
- 17.
Bakris GL, Fonseca VA, Sharma K, Wright EM. Renal sodium-glucose transport: role in diabetes mellitus and potential clinical implications. Kidney Int 2009;75:1272–1277.
Not in our library10.1038/ki.2009.87
- 18.
Mather A, Pollock C. Glucose handling by the kidney. Kidney Int 2011;79:S1–S6.
Not in our library10.1038/ki.2010.509
- 19.
Rahmoune H, Thompson PW, Ward JM, Smith CD, Hong G, Brown J. Glucose transporters in human renal proximal tubular cells isolated from the urine of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes 2005;54:3427–3434.
Not in our library10.2337/diabetes.54.12.3427
- 20.
Scheen AJ. Pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs 2015;75:33–59.
Not in our library10.1007/s40265-014-0337-y
- 21.
Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, Mainou M, Liakos A, Bekiari E, Sarigianni M, Matthews DR, Tsapas A. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:262–274.
Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00007
- 22.
Zaccardi F, Webb DR, Htike ZZ, Youssef D, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2016;18:783–794.
Not in our library10.1111/dom.12670
- 23.
Fujita Y, Inagaki N. Renal sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors as a novel therapeutic approach to treatment of type 2 diabetes: clinical data and mechanism of action. J Diabetes Investig 2014;5:265–275.
Not in our library10.1111/jdi.12214
- 24.
Ridderstråle M, Andersen KR, Zeller C, Kim G, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC. Comparison of empagliflozin and glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 104-week randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014;2:691–700.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70120-2
- 25.
Nauck MA, Del Prato S, Meier JJ, Duran-Garcia S, Rohwedder K, Elze M, Parikh SJ. Dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control with metformin: a randomized, 52–week, double-blind, active-controlled noninferiority trial. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2015–2022.
Not in our library10.2337/dc11-0606
- 26.
Cefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon K-H, Arias P, Niskanen L, Xie J, Balis DA, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2013;382:941–950.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60683-2
- 27.
Rodbard HW, Rosenstock J, Canani LH, Deerochanawong C, Gumprecht J, Lindberg S, Lingvay I, Søndergaard AL, Treppendahl MB, Montanya E. Oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin: the PIONEER 2 trial. Diabetes Care 2019;42:2272–2281.
Not in our library10.2337/dc19-0883
- 28.
Lingvay I, Catarig AM, Frias JP, Kumar H, Lausvig NL, le Roux CW, Thielke D, Viljoen A, McCrimmon RJ. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus daily canagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 8): a double-blind, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019;7:834–844.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30311-0
- 29.
Min SH, Yoon J-H, Hahn S, Cho YM. Comparison between SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors added to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with indirect comparison meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2017;33:e2818.
Not in our library10.1002/dmrr.2818
- 30.
Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Januszewicz A, Davidson J, Tong C, Qiu R, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trial. Diabetologia 2013;56:2582–2592.
Not in our library10.1007/s00125-013-3039-1
- 31.
Schernthaner G, Gross JL, Rosenstock J, Guarisco M, Fu M, Yee J, Kawaguchi M, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2508–2515.
Not in our library10.2337/dc12-2491
- 32.
Halimi S, Verges B. Adverse effects and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors. Diabetes Metab 2014;40:S28–S34.
Not in our library10.1016/s1262-3636(14)72693-x
- 33.
Chen S, Wang Q, Christodoulou A, Mylonas N, Bakker D, Nederlof R, Hollmann MW, Weber NC, Coronel R, Wakker V, Christoffels VM, Andreadou I, Zuurbier CJ. Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduces infarct size independently of sodium glucose cotransporter-2. Circulation 2023;147:276–279.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.122.061688
- 34.
Xu J, Hirai T, Koya D, Kitada M. Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on atherosclerosis: lessons from cardiovascular clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients and basic researches. J Clin Med 2021;11:137.
Not in our library10.3390/jcm11010137
- 35.
Packer M. Critical reanalysis of the mechanisms underlying the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors and reaffirmation of the nutrient deprivation signaling/autophagy hypothesis. Circulation 2022;146:1383–1405.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.122.061732
- 36.
Zhou L, Cryan EV, D'Andrea MR, Belkowski S, Conway BR, Demarest KT. Human cardiomyocytes express high level of Na+/glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1). J Cell Biochem 2003;90:339–346.
Not in our library10.1002/jcb.10631
- 37.
- 38.
- 39.
Miyata KN, Lo C-S, Zhao S, Liao M-C, Pang Y, Chang S-Y, Peng J, Kretzler M, Filep JG, Ingelfinger JR, Zhang S-L, Chan JSD. Angiotensin II up-regulates sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 expression and SGLT2 inhibitor attenuates Ang II-induced hypertensive renal injury in mice. Clin Sci (Lond) 2021;135:943–961.
Not in our library10.1042/cs20210094
- 40.
Khemais-Benkhiat S, Belcastro E, Idris-Khodja N, Park S-H, Amoura L, Abbas M, Auger C, Kessler L, Mayoux E, Toti F, Schini-Kerth VB. Angiotensin II-induced redox-sensitive SGLT1 and 2 expression promotes high glucose-induced endothelial cell senescence. J Cell Mol Med 2020;24:2109–2122.
Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.14233
- 41.
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
Steven S, Oelze M, Hanf A, Kroller-Schon S, Kashani F, Roohani S, Welschof P, Kopp M, Godtel-Armbrust U, Xia N, Li H, Schulz E, Lackner KJ, Wojnowski L, Bottari SP, Wenzel P, Mayoux E, Munzel T, Daiber A. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin improves the primary diabetic complications in ZDF rats. Redox Biol 2017;13:370–385.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2017.06.009
- 45.
Rahadian A, Fukuda D, Salim HM, Yagi S, Kusunose K, Yamada H, Soeki T, Sata M. Canagliflozin prevents diabetes-induced vascular dysfunction in ApoE-deficient mice. J Atheroscler Thromb 2020;27:1141–1151.
Not in our library10.5551/jat.52100
- 46.
Morsy MA, Khalaf HM, Rifaai RA, Bayoumi AMA, Khalifa E, Ibrahim YF. Canagliflozin, an SGLT-2 inhibitor, ameliorates acetic acid-induced colitis in rats through targeting glucose metabolism and inhibiting NOX2. Biomed Pharmacother 2021;141:111902.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111902
- 47.
Hasan R, Lasker S, Hasan A, Zerin F, Zamila M, Parvez F, Rahman MM, Khan F, Subhan N, Alam MA. Canagliflozin ameliorates renal oxidative stress and inflammation by stimulating AMPK–Akt–eNOS pathway in the isoprenaline-induced oxidative stress model. Sci Rep 2020;10:14659.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-71599-2
- 48.
Forstermann U, Xia N, Li H. Roles of vascular oxidative stress and nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2017;120:713–735.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.116.309326
- 49.
Juni RP, Al-Shama R, Kuster DWD, van der Velden J, Hamer HM, Vervloet MG, Eringa EC, Koolwijk P, van Hinsbergh VWM. Empagliflozin restores chronic kidney disease-induced impairment of endothelial regulation of cardiomyocyte relaxation and contraction. Kidney Int 2021;99:1088–1101.
Not in our library10.1016/j.kint.2020.12.013
- 50.
Juni RP, Kuster DWD, Goebel M, Helmes M, Musters RJP, van der Velden J, Koolwijk P, Paulus WJ, van Hinsbergh VWM. Cardiac microvascular endothelial enhancement of cardiomyocyte function is impaired by inflammation and restored by empagliflozin. JACC Basic Transl Sci 2019;4:575–591.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.04.003
- 51.
Nikolaou PE, Efentakis P, Abu Qourah F, Femmino S, Makridakis M, Kanaki Z, Varela A, Tsoumani M, Davos CH, Dimitriou CA, Tasouli A, Dimitriadis G, Kostomitsopoulos N, Zuurbier CJ, Vlahou A, Klinakis A, Brizzi MF, Iliodromitis EK, Andreadou I. Chronic empagliflozin treatment reduces myocardial infarct size in nondiabetic mice through STAT-3-mediated protection on microvascular endothelial cells and reduction of oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal 2021;34:551–571.
Not in our library10.1089/ars.2019.7923
- 52.
Li X, Romer G, Kerindongo RP, Hermanides J, Albrecht M, Hollmann MW, Zuurbier CJ, Preckel B, Weber NC. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors ameliorate endothelium barrier dysfunction induced by cyclic stretch through inhibition of reactive oxygen species. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:6044.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms22116044
- 53.
- 54.
Cai C, Guo Z, Chang X, Li Z, Wu F, He J, Cao T, Wang K, Shi N, Zhou H, Toan S, Muid D, Tan Y. Empagliflozin attenuates cardiac microvascular ischemia/reperfusion through activating the AMPKalpha1/ULK1/FUNDC1/mitophagy pathway. Redox Biol 2022;52:102288.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2022.102288
- 55.
- 56.
Pignatelli P, Baratta F, Buzzetti R, D'Amico A, Castellani V, Bartimoccia S, Siena A, D'Onofrio L, Maddaloni E, Pingitore A, Chiariello GA, Santilli F, Pastori D, Cocomello N, Violi F, Del Ben M, Cammisotto V, Carnevale R. The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce platelet activation and thrombus formation by lowering NOX2-related oxidative stress: a pilot study. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022;11:1878.
Not in our library10.3390/antiox11101878
- 57.
- 58.
Han JH, Oh TJ, Lee G, Maeng HJ, Lee DH, Kim KM, Choi SH, Jang HC, Lee HS, Park KS, Kim Y-B, Lim S. The beneficial effects of empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, on atherosclerosis in ApoE (-/-) mice fed a western diet. Diabetologia 2017;60:364–376.
Not in our library10.1007/s00125-016-4158-2
- 59.
Nakatsu Y, Kokubo H, Bumdelger B, Yoshizumi M, Yamamotoya T, Matsunaga Y, Ueda K, Inoue Y, Inoue MK, Fujishiro M, Kushiyama A, Ono H, Sakoda H, Asano T. The SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin rapidly normalizes aortic mRNA levels of inflammation-related but not lipid-metabolism-related genes and suppresses atherosclerosis in diabetic ApoE KO mice. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:1704.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms18081704
- 60.
Al-Sharea A, Murphy AJ, Huggins LA, Hu Y, Goldberg IJ, Nagareddy PR. SGLT2 inhibition reduces atherosclerosis by enhancing lipoprotein clearance in Ldlr(-/-) type 1 diabetic mice. Atherosclerosis 2018;271:166–176.
Not in our library10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.02.028
- 61.
Loos B, du Toit A, Hofmeyr J-HS. Defining and measuring autophagosome flux-concept and reality. Autophagy 2014;10:2087–2096.
Not in our library10.4161/15548627.2014.973338
- 62.
Xu J, Kitada M, Ogura Y, Koya D. Relationship between autophagy and metabolic syndrome characteristics in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:641852.
Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2021.641852
- 63.
Martinet W, De Meyer GR. Autophagy in atherosclerosis: a cell survival and death phenomenon with therapeutic potential. Circ Res 2009;104:304–317.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.108.188318
- 64.
Aragón-Herrera A, Feijóo-Bandín S, Otero Santiago M, Barral L, Campos-Toimil M, Gil-Longo J, Costa Pereira TM, García-Caballero T, Rodríguez-Segade S, Rodríguez J, Tarazón E, Roselló-Lletí E, Portolés M, Gualillo O, González-Juanatey JR, Lago F. Empagliflozin reduces the levels of CD36 and cardiotoxic lipids while improving autophagy in the hearts of Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Biochem Pharmacol 2019;170:113677.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2019.113677
- 65.
Jaikumkao K, Promsan S, Thongnak L, Swe MT, Tapanya M, Htun KT, Kothan S, Intachai N, Lungkaphin A. Dapagliflozin ameliorates pancreatic injury and activates kidney autophagy by modulating the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway in obese rats. J Cell Physiol 2021;236:6424–6440.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.30316
- 66.
Fukushima K, Kitamura S, Tsuji K, Wada J. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors work as a “regulator” of autophagic activity in overnutrition diseases. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:761842.
Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2021.761842
- 67.
Del Buono MG, Montone RA, Camilli M, Carbone S, Narula J, Lavie CJ, Niccoli G, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:1352–1371.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.042
- 68.
- 69.
Dimitriadis K, Adamopoulou E, Pyrpyris N, Sakalidis A, Leontsinis I, Manta E, Mantzouranis E, Beneki E, Soulaidopoulos S, Konstantinidis D, Fragkoulis C, Aggeli K, Tsioufis K. The effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the endothelium and the microcirculation: from bench to bedside and beyond. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2023;9:741–757.
Not in our library10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad053
- 70.
- 71.
Gaspari T, Spizzo I, Liu H, Hu Y, Simpson RW, Widdop RE, Dear AE. Dapagliflozin attenuates human vascular endothelial cell activation and induces vasorelaxation: a potential mechanism for inhibition of atherogenesis. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2018;15:64–73.
Not in our library10.1177/1479164117733626
- 72.
Wan Z, Wen W, Ren K, Zhou D, Liu J, Wu Y, Zhou J, Mu J, Yuan Z. Involvement of NLRP3 inflammasome in the impacts of sodium and potassium on insulin resistance in normotensive Asians. Br J Nutr 2018;119:228–237.
Not in our library10.1017/s0007114517002926
- 73.
Dmitrieva NI, Burg MB. Elevated sodium and dehydration stimulate inflammatory signaling in endothelial cells and promote atherosclerosis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0128870.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0128870
- 74.
Liberale L, Kraler S, Puspitasari YM, Bonetti NR, Akhmedov A, Ministrini S, Montecucco F, Marx N, Lehrke M, Hartmann NUK, Beer JH, Wenzl FA, Paneni F, Luscher TF, Camici GG. SGLT-2 inhibition by empagliflozin has no effect on experimental arterial thrombosis in a murine model of low-grade inflammation. Cardiovasc Res 2023;119:843–856.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvac126
- 75.
Abdul-Ghani MA, Norton L, DeFronzo RA. Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Diab Rep 2012;12:230–238.
Not in our library10.1007/s11892-012-0275-6
- 76.
Bolinder J, Ljunggren Ö, Kullberg J, Johansson L, Wilding J, Langkilde AM, Sugg J, Parikh S. Effects of dapagliflozin on body weight, total fat mass, and regional adipose tissue distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control on metformin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:1020–1031.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2011-2260
- 77.
Cheong AJY, Teo YN, Teo YH, Syn NL, Ong HT, Ting AZH, Chia AZQ, Chong EY, Chan MY, Lee C-H, Lim AYL, Kong WKF, Wong RCC, Chai P, Sia C-H. SGLT inhibitors on weight and body mass: a meta-analysis of 116 randomized-controlled trials. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2022;30:117–128.
Not in our library10.1002/oby.23331
- 78.
- 79.
Rajeev SP, Cuthbertson DJ, Wilding JPH. Energy balance and metabolic changes with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition. Diabetes Obes Metab 2016;18:125–134.
Not in our library10.1111/dom.12578
- 80.
Fadini GP, Sciannameo V, Franzetti I, Bottigliengo D, D'Angelo P, Vinci C, Berchialla P, Arena S, Buzzetti R, Avogaro A; DARWIN-T2D network. Similar effectiveness of dapagliflozin and GLP-1 receptor agonists concerning combined endpoints in routine clinical practice: a multicentre retrospective study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:1886–1894.
Not in our library10.1111/dom.13747
- 81.
Ferrannini E, Baldi S, Frascerra S, Astiarraga B, Heise T, Bizzotto R, Mari A, Pieber TR, Muscelli E. Shift to fatty substrate utilization in response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in subjects without diabetes and patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2016;65:1190–1195.
Not in our library10.2337/db15-1356
- 82.
Kim JH, Lee M, Kim SH, Kim SR, Lee B-W, Kang ES, Cha B-S, Cho JW, Lee Y-H. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors regulate ketone body metabolism via inter-organ crosstalk. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:801–811.
Not in our library10.1111/dom.13577
- 83.
Chilton R, Tikkanen I, Cannon CP, Crowe S, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Johansen OE. Effects of empagliflozin on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015;17:1180–1193.
Not in our library10.1111/dom.12572
- 84.
- 85.
Striepe K, Jumar A, Ott C, Karg MV, Schneider MP, Kannenkeril D, Schmieder RE. Effects of the selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin on vascular function and central hemodynamics in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2017;136:1167–1169.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.117.029529
- 86.
- 87.
Bailey CJ. Uric acid and the cardio-renal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:1291–1298.
Not in our library10.1111/dom.13670
- 88.
Zhao Y, Xu L, Tian D, Xia P, Zheng H, Wang L, Chen L. Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on serum uric acid level: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:458–462.
Not in our library10.1111/dom.13101
- 89.
Kırça M, Oğuz N, Çetin A, Uzuner F, Yeşilkaya A. Uric acid stimulates proliferative pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells through the activation of p38 MAPK, p44/42 MAPK and PDGFRβ. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2017;37:167–173.
Not in our library10.1080/10799893.2016.1203941
- 90.
Yu M-A, Sánchez-Lozada LG, Johnson RJ, Kang D-H. Oxidative stress with an activation of the renin-angiotensin system in human vascular endothelial cells as a novel mechanism of uric acid-induced endothelial dysfunction. J Hypertens 2010;28:1234–1242.
Not in our library
- 91.
Gersch C, Palii SP, Kim KM, Angerhofer A, Johnson RJ, Henderson GN. Inactivation of nitric oxide by uric acid. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2008;27:967–978.
Not in our library10.1080/15257770802257952
- 92.
Kanbay M, Xhaard C, Le Floch E, Dandine-Roulland C, Girerd N, Ferreira JP, Boivin J-M, Wagner S, Bacq-Daian D, Deleuze JF, Zannad F, Rossignol P. Weak association between genetic markers of hyperuricemia and cardiorenal outcomes: insights from the STANISLAS study cohort with a 20-year follow-up. J Am Heart Assoc 2022;11:e023301.
Not in our library10.1161/jaha.121.023301
- 93.
Mackenzie IS, Hawkey CJ, Ford I, Greenlaw N, Pigazzani F, Rogers A, Struthers AD, Begg AG, Wei L, Avery AJ, Taggar JS, Walker A, Duce SL, Barr RJ, Dumbleton JS, Rooke ED, Townend JN, Ritchie LD, MacDonald TM; ALL-HEART Study Group. Allopurinol versus usual care in UK patients with ischaemic heart disease (ALL-HEART): a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. Lancet 2022;400:1195–1205.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01657-9
- 94.
Nayak S, Rathore V, Bharati J, Sahu KK. Extending the ambit of SGLT2 inhibitors beyond diabetes: a review of clinical and preclinical studies on non-diabetic kidney disease. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2021;14:1513–1526.
Not in our library10.1080/17512433.2021.2028620
- 95.
Hallow KM, Gebremichael Y, Helmlinger G, Vallon V. Primary proximal tubule hyperreabsorption and impaired tubular transport counterregulation determine glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetes: a modeling analysis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2017;312:F819–F835.
Not in our library10.1152/ajprenal.00497.2016
- 96.
Lim BJ, Yang JW, Zou J, Zhong J, Matsusaka T, Pastan I, Zhang M-Z, Harris RC, Yang H-C, Fogo AB. Tubulointerstitial fibrosis can sensitize the kidney to subsequent glomerular injury. Kidney Int 2017;92:1395–1403.
Not in our library10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.010
- 97.
Chevalier RL, Forbes MS. Generation and evolution of atubular glomeruli in the progression of renal disorders. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;19:197–206.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.2007080862
- 98.
- 99.
- 100.
Huang F, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Hillebrands J-L, van den Born J, Ji L, An T, Qin G. Dapagliflozin attenuates renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis associated with type 1 diabetes by regulating STAT1/TGFβ1 signaling. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019;10:441.
Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2019.00441
- 101.
Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Zannad F. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for the treatment of patients with heart failure: proposal of a novel mechanism of action. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:1025–1029.
Not in our library10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2275
- 102.
Hallow KM, Greasley PJ, Helmlinger G, Chu L, Heerspink HJ, Boulton DW. Evaluation of renal and cardiovascular protection mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibitors: model-based analysis of clinical data. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2018;315:F1295–F1306.
Not in our library10.1152/ajprenal.00202.2018
- 103.
Borges FA Jr, Silva CA, Crajoinas RO, Castelo-Branco RC, Luchi WM, Girardi ACC. Empagliflozin inhibits NHE3 activity in the proximal tubule of normotensive and hypertensive rats. FASEB J 2018;32:lb355.
Not in our library
- 104.
Li XC, Zhu D, Chen X, Zheng X, Zhao C, Zhang J, Soleimani M, Rubera I, Tauc M, Zhou X, Zhuo JL. Proximal tubule-specific deletion of the NHE3 (Na(+)/H(+) exchanger 3) in the kidney attenuates Ang II (angiotensin II)-induced hypertension in mice. Hypertension 2019;74:526–535.
Not in our library10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.13094
- 105.
Onishi A, Fu Y, Patel R, Darshi M, Crespo-Masip M, Huang W, Song P, Freeman B, Kim YC, Soleimani M, Sharma K, Thomson SC, Vallon V. A role for tubular Na(+)/H(+) exchanger NHE3 in the natriuretic effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2020;319:F712–F728.
Not in our library10.1152/ajprenal.00264.2020
- 106.
Pessoa TD, Campos LC, Carraro-Lacroix L, Girardi AC, Malnic G. Functional role of glucose metabolism, osmotic stress, and sodium-glucose cotransporter isoform-mediated transport on Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 3 activity in the renal proximal tubule. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;25:2028–2039.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.2013060588
- 107.
Stevens VA, Saad S, Poronnik P, Fenton-Lee CA, Polhill TS, Pollock CA. The role of SGK-1 in angiotensin II-mediated sodium reabsorption in human proximal tubular cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:1834–1843.
Not in our library10.1093/ndt/gfm923
- 108.
Girardi AC, Di Sole F. Deciphering the mechanisms of the Na+/H+ exchanger-3 regulation in organ dysfunction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2012;302:C1569–C1587.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpcell.00017.2012
- 109.
Packer M. Lack of durable natriuresis and objective decongestion following SGLT2 inhibition in randomized controlled trials of patients with heart failure. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2023;22:197.
Not in our library10.1186/s12933-023-01946-w
- 110.
Borlaug BA, Testani JM. SGLT2 inhibitors and diuretics in heart failure: clicking reset on the renal volume setpoint? Eur Heart J 2023;44:2944–2946.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehad345
- 111.
Thiele K, Rau M, Hartmann N-UK, Mollmann J, Jankowski J, Bohm M, Keszei AP, Marx N, Lehrke M. Effects of empagliflozin on erythropoiesis in patients with type 2 diabetes: data from a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021;23:2814–2818.
Not in our library10.1111/dom.14517
- 112.
Packer M. Mechanisms of enhanced renal and hepatic erythropoietin synthesis by sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Eur Heart J 2023;44:5027–5035.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehad235
- 113.
Sano M, Takei M, Shiraishi Y, Suzuki Y. Increased hematocrit during sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy indicates recovery of tubulointerstitial function in diabetic kidneys. J Clin Med Res 2016;8:844–847.
Not in our library10.14740/jocmr2760w
- 114.
Ljubojevic-Holzer S, Kraler S, Djalinac N, Abdellatif M, Voglhuber J, Schipke J, Schmidt M, Kling KM, Franke GT, Herbst V, Zirlik A, von Lewinski D, Scherr D, Rainer PP, Kohlhaas M, Nickel A, Muhlfeld C, Maack C, Sedej S. Loss of autophagy protein ATG5 impairs cardiac capacity in mice and humans through diminishing mitochondrial abundance and disrupting Ca2+ cycling. Cardiovasc Res 2022;118:1492–1505.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvab112
- 115.
Despa S. Myocyte [Na+]i dysregulation in heart failure and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Front Physiol 2018;9:1303.
Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2018.01303
- 116.
Packer M. Activation and inhibition of sodium-hydrogen exchanger is a mechanism that links the pathophysiology and treatment of diabetes mellitus with that of heart failure. Circulation 2017;136:1548–1559.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.117.030418
- 117.
Teshima Y, Takahashi N, Saikawa T, Hara M, Yasunaga S, Hidaka S, Sakata T. Diminished expression of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase and ryanodine sensitive Ca(2+)channel mRNA in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2000;32:655–664.
Not in our library10.1006/jmcc.2000.1107
- 118.
Gollmer J, Zirlik A, Bugger H. Mitochondrial mechanisms in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes Metab J 2020;44:33–53.
Not in our library10.4093/dmj.2019.0185
- 119.
Kohlhaas M, Liu T, Knopp A, Zeller T, Ong MF, Böhm M, O'Rourke B, Maack C. Elevated cytosolic Na+ increases mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species in failing cardiac myocytes. Circulation 2010;121:1606–1613.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.109.914911
- 120.
Yaribeygi H, Atkin SL, Butler AE, Sahebkar A. Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors and oxidative stress: an update. J Cell Physiol 2019;234:3231–3237.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.26760
- 121.
Lee T-M, Chang N-C, Lin S-Z. Dapagliflozin, a selective SGLT2 inhibitor, attenuated cardiac fibrosis by regulating the macrophage polarization via STAT3 signaling in infarcted rat hearts. Free Radic Biol Med 2017;104:298–310.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.01.035
- 122.
- 123.
- 124.
Basu D, Huggins L-A, Scerbo D, Obunike J, Mullick AE, Rothenberg PL, Di Prospero NA, Eckel RH, Goldberg IJ. Mechanism of increased LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and decreased triglycerides with SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibition. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2018;38:2207–2216.
Not in our library10.1161/atvbaha.118.311339
- 125.
- 126.
Tian R, Musi N, D'Agostino J, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ. Increased adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activity in rat hearts with pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation 2001;104:1664–1669.
Not in our library10.1161/hc4001.097183
- 127.
Varma U, Koutsifeli P, Benson VL, Mellor KM, Delbridge LMD. Molecular mechanisms of cardiac pathology in diabetes—experimental insights. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2018;1864:1949–1959.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.10.035
- 128.
Beauloye C, Bertrand L, Horman S, Hue L. AMPK activation, a preventive therapeutic target in the transition from cardiac injury to heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 2011;90:224–233.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvr034
- 129.
Chase D, Eykyn TR, Shattock MJ, Chung YJ. Empagliflozin improves cardiac energetics during ischaemia/reperfusion by directly increasing cardiac ketone utilisation. Cardiovasc Res 2023;119:2672–2680.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvad157
- 130.
Kuhre RE, Ghiasi SM, Adriaenssens AE, Wewer Albrechtsen NJ, Andersen DB, Aivazidis A, Chen L, Mandrup-Poulsen T, Orskov C, Gribble FM, Reimann F, Wierup N, Tyrberg B, Holst JJ. No direct effect of SGLT2 activity on glucagon secretion. Diabetologia 2019;62:1011–1023.
Not in our library10.1007/s00125-019-4849-6
- 131.
Ferrannini E, Muscelli E, Frascerra S, Baldi S, Mari A, Heise T, Broedl UC, Woerle H-J. Metabolic response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Invest 2014;124:499–508.
Not in our library10.1172/jci72227
- 132.
Bonner C, Kerr-Conte J, Gmyr V, Queniat G, Moerman E, Thevenet J, Beaucamps C, Delalleau N, Popescu I, Malaisse WJ, Sener A, Deprez B, Abderrahmani A, Staels B, Pattou F. Inhibition of the glucose transporter SGLT2 with dapagliflozin in pancreatic alpha cells triggers glucagon secretion. Nat Med 2015;21:512–517.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.3828
- 133.
Musso G, Saba F, Cassader M, Gambino R. Diabetic ketoacidosis with SGLT2 inhibitors. BMJ 2020;371:m4147.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.m4147
- 134.
Despa S, Lingrel JB, Bers DM. Na(+)/K)+)-ATPase α2-isoform preferentially modulates Ca2(+) transients and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2(+) release in cardiac myocytes. Cardiovasc Res 2012;95:480–486.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvs213
- 135.
Karmazyn M. NHE-1: still a viable therapeutic target. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2013;61:77–82.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.02.006
- 136.
Baartscheer A, Schumacher CA, Belterman CN, Coronel R, Fiolet JW. [Na+]i and the driving force of the Na+/Ca2+-exchanger in heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 2003;57:986–995.
Not in our library10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00848-9
- 137.
Schwinger RH, Bundgaard H, Müller-Ehmsen J, Kjeldsen K. The Na, K-ATPase in the failing human heart. Cardiovasc Res 2003;57:913–920.
Not in our library10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00767-8
- 138.
- 139.
- 140.
Hamouda NN, Sydorenko V, Qureshi MA, Alkaabi JM, Oz M, Howarth FC. Dapagliflozin reduces the amplitude of shortening and Ca(2+) transient in ventricular myocytes from streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Mol Cell Biochem 2015;400:57–68.
Not in our library10.1007/s11010-014-2262-5
- 141.
Inoue M-K, Matsunaga Y, Nakatsu Y, Yamamotoya T, Ueda K, Kushiyama A, Sakoda H, Fujishiro M, Ono H, Iwashita M, Sano T, Nishimura F, Morii K, Sasaki K, Masaki T, Asano T. Possible involvement of normalized Pin1 expression level and AMPK activation in the molecular mechanisms underlying renal protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in mice. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2019;11:57.
Not in our library10.1186/s13098-019-0454-6
- 142.
- 143.
Meijles DN, Zoumpoulidou G, Markou T, Rostron KA, Patel R, Lay K, Handa BS, Wong B, Sugden PH, Clerk A. The cardiomyocyte “redox rheostat”: redox signalling via the AMPK-mTOR axis and regulation of gene and protein expression balancing survival and death. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2019;129:118–129.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.02.006
- 144.
Gao Y-M, Feng S-T, Wen Y, Tang T-T, Wang B, Liu B-C. Cardiorenal protection of SGLT2 inhibitors-perspectives from metabolic reprogramming. EBioMedicine 2022;83:104215.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104215
- 145.
- 146.
Jansen T, Kvandová M, Daiber A, Stamm P, Frenis K, Schulz E, Münzel T, Kröller-Schön S. The AMP-activated protein kinase plays a role in antioxidant defense and regulation of vascular inflammation. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020;9:525.
Not in our library10.3390/antiox9060525
- 147.
- 148.
Sayour AA, Celeng C, Oláh A, Ruppert M, Merkely B, Radovits T. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce myocardial infarct size in preclinical animal models of myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2021;64:737–748.
Not in our library10.1007/s00125-020-05359-2
- 149.
Santos-Gallego CG, Requena-Ibanez JA, Antonio RS, Garcia-Ropero A, Ishikawa K, Watanabe S, Picatoste B, Vargas-Delgado AP, Flores-Umanzor EJ, Sanz J, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Empagliflozin ameliorates diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular fibrosis/stiffness in nondiabetic heart failure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14:393–407.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.07.042
- 150.
Santos-Gallego CG, Requena-Ibanez JA, Antonio RS, Ishikawa K, Watanabe S, Picatoste B, Flores E, Garcia-Ropero A, Sanz J, Hajjar RJ, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Empagliflozin ameliorates adverse left ventricular remodeling in nondiabetic heart failure by enhancing myocardial energetics. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:1931–1944.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.056
- 151.
Ferrannini E, Mark M, Mayoux E. CV protection in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial: a “thrifty substrate” hypothesis. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1108–1114.
Not in our library10.2337/dc16-0330
- 152.
Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, Januzzi J, Verma S, Tsutsui H, Brueckmann M, Jamal W, Kimura K, Schnee J, Zeller C, Cotton D, Bocchi E, Böhm M, Choi D-J, Chopra V, Chuquiure E, Giannetti N, Janssens S, Zhang J, Gonzalez Juanatey JR, Kaul S, Brunner-La Rocca H-P, Merkely B, Nicholls SJ, Perrone S, Pina I, Ponikowski P, Sattar N, Senni M, Seronde M-F, Spinar J, Squire I, Taddei S, Wanner C, Zannad F. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1413–1424.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2022190
- 153.
Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bocchi E, Böhm M, Brunner–La Rocca H-P, Choi D-J, Chopra V, Chuquiure-Valenzuela E, Giannetti N, Gomez-Mesa JE, Janssens S, Januzzi JL, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Merkely B, Nicholls SJ, Perrone SV, Piña IL, Ponikowski P, Senni M, Sim D, Spinar J, Squire I, Taddei S, Tsutsui H, Verma S, Vinereanu D, Zhang J, Carson P, Lam CSP, Marx N, Zeller C, Sattar N, Jamal W, Schnaidt S, Schnee JM, Brueckmann M, Pocock SJ, Zannad F, Packer M. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1451–1461.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2107038
- 154.
McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Anand IS, Bělohlávek J, Böhm M, Chiang C-E, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, Desai AS, Diez M, Drozdz J, Dukát A, Ge J, Howlett JG, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Ljungman CEA, Merkely B, Nicolau JC, O’Meara E, Petrie MC, Vinh PN, Schou M, Tereshchenko S, Verma S, Held C, DeMets DL, Docherty KF, Jhund PS, Bengtsson O, Sjöstrand M, Langkilde A-M. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1995–2008.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1911303
- 155.
Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, de Boer RA, DeMets D, Hernandez AF, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Lam CSP, Martinez F, Shah SJ, Desai AS, Jhund PS, Belohlavek J, Chiang C-E, Borleffs CJW, Comin-Colet J, Dobreanu D, Drozdz J, Fang JC, Alcocer-Gamba MA, Al Habeeb W, Han Y, Cabrera Honorio JW, Janssens SP, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Merkely B, O’Meara E, Saraiva JFK, Tereshchenko SN, Thierer J, Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Verma S, Pham VN, Wilderang U, Zaozerska N, Bachus E, Lindholm D, Petersson M, Langkilde AM; DELIVER Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1089–1098.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2206286
- 156.
McGuire DK, Shih WJ, Cosentino F, Charbonnel B, Cherney DZI, Dagogo-Jack S, Pratley R, Greenberg M, Wang S, Huyck S, Gantz I, Terra SG, Masiukiewicz U, Cannon CP. Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2021;6:148–158.
Not in our library10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4511
- 157.
- 158.
Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, Im K, Goodrich EL, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, Furtado RHM, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Sabatine MS. SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet 2019;393:31–39.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32590-x
- 159.
- 160.
Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, Silverman MG, Zelniker TA, Kuder JF, Murphy SA, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Ruff CT, Gause-Nilsson IAM, Fredriksson M, Johansson PA, Langkilde A-M, Sabatine MS. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2018;380:347–357.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1812389
- 161.
Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2117–2128.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1504720
- 162.
Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, Shaw W, Law G, Desai M, Matthews DR. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017;377:644–657.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1611925
- 163.
Cannon CP, Pratley R, Dagogo-Jack S, Mancuso J, Huyck S, Masiukiewicz U, Charbonnel B, Frederich R, Gallo S, Cosentino F, Shih WJ, Gantz I, Terra SG, Cherney DZI, McGuire DK. Cardiovascular outcomes with ertugliflozin in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1425–1435.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2004967
- 164.
Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, Bompoint S, Heerspink HJL, Charytan DM, Edwards R, Agarwal R, Bakris G, Bull S, Cannon CP, Capuano G, Chu P-L, de Zeeuw D, Greene T, Levin A, Pollock C, Wheeler DC, Yavin Y, Zhang H, Zinman B, Meininger G, Brenner BM, Mahaffey KW. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2295–2306.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1811744
- 165.
Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Pitt B, Cannon CP, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Lewis JB, Riddle MC, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Cherney DZI, Dwyer JP, Scirica BM, Bailey CJ, Díaz R, Ray KK, Udell JA, Lopes RD, Lapuerta P, Steg PG. Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2020;384:129–139.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2030186
- 166.
McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, Rouleau JL, Shi VC, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Zile MR. Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014;371:993–1004.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1409077
- 167.
Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Dubost-Brama A, Lerebours G, Tavazzi L. Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2010;376:875–885.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61259-7
- 168.
Verma S, McGuire DK, Kosiborod MN. Two tales: one story. Circulation 2020;142:2201–2204.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.120.051122
- 169.
Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Steg PG, Cannon CP, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Lewis JB, Riddle MC, Voors AA, Metra M, Lund LH, Komajda M, Testani JM, Wilcox CS, Ponikowski P, Lopes RD, Verma S, Lapuerta P, Pitt B. Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure. N Engl J Med 2020;384:117–128.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2030183
- 170.
Kjeldsen SE, von Lueder TG, Smiseth OA, Wachtell K, Mistry N, Westheim AS, Hopper I, Julius S, Pitt B, Reid CM, Devereux RB, Zannad F. Medical therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Hypertension 2020;75:23–32.
Not in our library10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.14057
- 171.
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3599–3726.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehab670
- 172.
Butt JH, Kondo T, Yang M, Jhund PS, Docherty KF, Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Hernandez AF, Lam CSP, Inzucchi SE, Martinez FA, de Boer RA, Kosiborod MN, Desai AS, Kober L, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Shah SJ, Zaozerska N, Wilderang U, Bengtsson O, Solomon SD, McMurray JJV. Heart failure, peripheral artery disease, and dapagliflozin: a patient-level meta-analysis of DAPA-HF and DELIVER. Eur Heart J 2023;44:2170–2183.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehad276
- 173.
Chatur S, Vaduganathan M, Claggett B, Vardeny O, Desai AS, Jhund PS, de Boer RA, Lam CSP, Kosiborod MN, Shah SJ, Martinez F, Inzucchi SE, Hernandez AF, Haddad T, Mitter SS, Miao ZM, Petersson M, Langkilde AM, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD. Dapagliflozin and diuretic utilization in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: the DELIVER trial. Eur Heart J 2023;44:2930–2943.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehad283
- 174.
Butler J, Usman MS, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bohm M, Brueckmann M, Januzzi JL, Kaul S, Pina IL, Ponikowski P, Senni M, Sumin M, Verma S, Zaremba-Pechmann L, Pocock SJ, Packer M, Anker S. Safety and efficacy of empagliflozin and diuretic use in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a post hoc analysis of the EMPEROR-preserved trial. JAMA Cardiol 2023;8:640–649.
Not in our library10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1090
- 175.
- 176.
Pitt B, Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Cannon CP, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Lewis JB, Riddle MC, Voors AA, Metra M, Lund LH, Komajda M, Testani JM, Wilcox CS, Ponikowski P, Lopes RD, Ezekowitz JA, Sun F, Davies MJ, Verma S, Kosiborod MN, Steg PG; SOLOIST-WHF Investigators. Effect of sotagliflozin on early mortality and heart failure-related events: a post hoc analysis of SOLOIST-WHF. JACC Heart Fail 2023;11:879–889.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jchf.2023.05.026
- 177.
- 178.
- 179.
- 180.
Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Ponikowski P, Agostoni P, Butler J, Desai AS, Filippatos G, Gniot J, Fu M, Gullestad L, Howlett JG, Nicholls SJ, Redon J, Schenkenberger I, Silva-Cardoso J, Stork S, Krzysztof Wranicz J, Savarese G, Brueckmann M, Jamal W, Nordaby M, Peil B, Ritter I, Ustyugova A, Zeller C, Salsali A, Anker SD. Effect of empagliflozin on exercise ability and symptoms in heart failure patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction, with and without type 2 diabetes. Eur Heart J 2021;42:700–710.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa943
- 181.
Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, Cohen-Solal A, Diaz R, Filippatos G, Metra M, Ponikowski P, Sliwa K, Voors AA, Edwards C, Novosadova M, Takagi K, Damasceno A, Saidu H, Gayat E, Pang PS, Celutkiene J, Cotter G. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet 2022;400:1938–1952.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02076-1
- 182.
Butler J, Packer M, Siddiqi TJ, Bohm M, Brueckmann M, Januzzi JL, Verma S, Gergei I, Iwata T, Wanner C, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Filippatos G, Anker SD, Zannad F. Efficacy of empagliflozin in patients with heart failure across kidney risk categories. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:1902–1914.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.390
- 183.
Satchell SC, Tooke JE. What is the mechanism of microalbuminuria in diabetes: a role for the glomerular endothelium? Diabetologia 2008;51:714–725.
Not in our library10.1007/s00125-008-0961-8
- 184.
Rowe DJF, Dawnay A, Watts GF. Microalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus: review and recommendations for the measurement of albumin in urine. Ann Clin Biochem 1990;27:297–312.
Not in our library10.1177/000456329002700404
- 185.
Bae JH, Park E-G, Kim S, Kim SG, Hahn S, Kim NH. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep 2019;9:13009.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-49525-y
- 186.
Heerspink HJL, Karasik A, Thuresson M, Melzer-Cohen C, Chodick G, Khunti K, Wilding JPH, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Cea-Soriano L, Kohsaka S, Nicolucci A, Lucisano G, Lin F-J, Wang C-Y, Wittbrodt E, Fenici P, Kosiborod M. Kidney outcomes associated with use of SGLT2 inhibitors in real-world clinical practice (CVD-REAL 3): a multinational observational cohort study. Lancet Diab Endocrinol 2020;8:27–35.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30384-5
- 187.
Lo KB, Gul F, Ram P, Kluger AY, Tecson KM, McCullough PA, Rangaswami J. The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiorenal Med 2020;10:1–10.
Not in our library10.1159/000503919
- 188.
Kuchay MS, Krishan S, Mishra SK, Farooqui KJ, Singh MK, Wasir JS, Bansal B, Kaur P, Jevalikar G, Gill HK, Choudhary NS, Mithal A. Effect of empagliflozin on liver fat in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled trial (E-LIFT trial). Diabetes Care 2018;41:1801–1808.
Not in our library10.2337/dc18-0165
- 189.
- 190.
Jongs N, Greene T, Chertow GM, McMurray JJV, Langkilde AM, Correa-Rotter R, Rossing P, Sjöström CD, Stefansson BV, Toto RD, Wheeler DC, Heerspink HJL; DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators. Effect of dapagliflozin on urinary albumin excretion in patients with chronic kidney disease with and without type 2 diabetes: a prespecified analysis from the DAPA-CKD trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021;9:755–766.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00243-6
- 191.
Heerspink HJL, Stefánsson BV, Correa-Rotter R, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou F-F, Mann JFE, McMurray JJV, Lindberg M, Rossing P, Sjöström CD, Toto RD, Langkilde A-M, Wheeler DC; DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1436–1446.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2024816
- 192.
The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group; Herrington WG, Staplin N, Wanner C, Green JB, Hauske SJ, Emberson JR, Preiss D, Judge P, Mayne KJ, Ng SYA, Sammons E, Zhu D, Hill M, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Brenner S, Cheung AK, Liu ZH, Li J, Hooi LS, Liu W, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Levin A, Cherney D, Maggioni AP, Pontremoli R, Deo R, Goto S, Rossello X, Tuttle KR, Steubl D, Petrini M, Massey D, Eilbracht J, Brueckmann M, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Haynes R. Empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2023;388:117–127.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2204233
- 193.
Mc Causland FR, Claggett BL, Vaduganathan M, Desai AS, Jhund P, de Boer RA, Docherty K, Fang J, Hernandez AF, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Lam CSP, Martinez F, Saraiva JFK, McGrath MM, Shah SJ, Verma S, Langkilde AM, Petersson M, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD. Dapagliflozin and kidney outcomes in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a prespecified analysis of the DELIVER randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 2023;8:56–65.
Not in our library10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4210
- 194.
von Lewinski D, Kolesnik E, Tripolt NJ, Pferschy PN, Benedikt M, Wallner M, Alber H, Berger R, Lichtenauer M, Saely CH, Moertl D, Auersperg P, Reiter C, Rieder T, Siller-Matula JM, Gager GM, Hasun M, Weidinger F, Pieber TR, Zechner PM, Herrmann M, Zirlik A, Holman RR, Oulhaj A, Sourij H. Empagliflozin in acute myocardial infarction: the EMMY trial. Eur Heart J 2022;43:4421–4432.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehac494
- 195.
Zhu Y, Zhang J-L, Yan X-J, Sun L, Ji Y, Wang F-F. Effect of dapagliflozin on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2022;21:186.
Not in our library10.1186/s12933-022-01627-0
- 196.
James S, Erlinge D, Storey RF, McGuire DK, de Belder M, Eriksson N, Andersen K, Austin D, Arefalk G, Carrick D, Hofmann R, Hoole SP, Jones DA, Lee K, Tygesen H, Johansson PA, Langkilde AM, Ridderstråle W, Rizi EP, Deanfield J, Oldgren J. Dapagliflozin in myocardial infarction without diabetes or heart failure. NEJM Evid 2023;3:EVIDoa2300286.
Not in our library10.1056/evidoa2300286
- 197.
Pandey AK, Okaj I, Kaur H, Belley-Cote EP, Wang J, Oraii A, Benz AP, Johnson LSB, Young J, Wong JA, Verma S, Conen D, Gerstein H, Healey JS, McIntyre WF. Sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e022222.
Not in our library10.1161/jaha.121.022222
- 198.
Li D, Liu Y, Hidru TH, Yang X, Wang Y, Chen C, Li KHC, Tang Y, Wei Y, Tse G, Xia Y. Protective effects of sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors on atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:619586.
Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2021.619586
- 199.
Zelniker TA, Bonaca MP, Furtado RHM, Mosenzon O, Kuder JF, Murphy SA, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Budaj A, Kiss RG, Padilla F, Gause-Nilsson I, Langkilde AM, Raz I, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD. Effect of dapagliflozin on atrial fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial. Circulation 2020;141:1227–1234.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.119.044183
- 200.
Zhou Z, Jardine MJ, Li Q, Neuen BL, Cannon CP, de Zeeuw D, Edwards R, Levin A, Mahaffey KW, Perkovic V, Neal B, Lindley RI; CREDENCE Trial Investigators. Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on stroke and atrial fibrillation in diabetic kidney disease: results from the CREDENCE trial and meta-analysis. Stroke 2021;52:1545–1556.
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.120.031623
- 201.
Bisson A, Bodin A, Fauchier G, Herbert J, Angoulvant D, Ducluzeau PH, Lip GYH, Fauchier L. Sex, age, type of diabetes and incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a nationwide analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2021;20:24.
Not in our library10.1186/s12933-021-01216-7
- 202.
Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, Carson AP, Commodore-Mensah Y, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Eze-Nliam C, Ferguson JF, Generoso G, Ho JE, Kalani R, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Levine DA, Lewis TT, Liu J, Loop MS, Ma J, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Perak AM, Poudel R, Rezk-Hanna M, Roth GA, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Thacker EL, VanWagner LB, Virani SS, Voecks JH, Wang N-Y, Yaffe K, Martin SS. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022;145:e153–e639.
Not in our library10.1161/cir.0000000000001052
- 203.
Tsai W-H, Chuang S-M, Liu S-C, Lee C-C, Chien M-N, Leung C-H, Liu S-J, Shih H-M. Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on stroke and its subtypes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2021;11:15364.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-021-94945-4
- 204.
Braunwald E. SGLT2 inhibitors: the statins of the 21st century. Eur Heart J 2022;43:1029–1030.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehab765
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.