Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent observational data and a controlled in-patient crossover feeding trial show that consumption of "ultra-processed foods" (UPFs), as defined by the NOVA classification system, is associated with higher energy intake, adiposity, and at a population level, higher prevalence of obesity. A drawback of the NOVA classification is the lack of evidence supporting a causal mechanism for why UPFs lead to overconsumption of energy. In a recent study by Hall the energy intake rate in the UPF condition (48 kcal/min) was >50% higher than in the unprocessed condition (31 kcal/min). Extensive empirical evidence has shown the impact that higher energy density has on increasing ad libitum energy intake and body weight. A significant body of research has shown that consuming foods at higher eating rates is related to higher energy intake and a higher prevalence of obesity. Energy density can be combined with eating rate to create a measure of energy intake rate (kcal/min), providing an index of a food's potential to promote increased energy intake. OBJECTIVE: The current paper compared the association between measured energy intake rate and level of processing as defined by the NOVA classification. METHODS: Data were pooled from 5 published studies that measured energy intake rates across a total sample of 327 foods. RESULTS: < 0.05). However, within each processing category there is wide variability in the energy intake rate. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that reported relations between UPF consumption and obesity should account for differences in energy intake rates when comparing unprocessed and ultra-processed diets. Future research requires well-controlled human feeding trials to establish the causal mechanisms for why certain UPFs can promote higher energy intake.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 63

1. 1.

   Fiolet T, Srour B, Sellem L, Kesse-Guyot E, Allès B, Méjean C, Deschasaux M, Fassier P, Latino-Martel P, Beslay M Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. BMJ. 2018;360:k322.

   Not in our library10.1136/bmj.k322

2. 2.

   Schnabel L, Kesse-Guyot E, Allès B, Touvier M, Srour B, Hercberg S, Buscail C, Julia C Association between ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of mortality among middle-aged adults in France. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(4):490–8.

   Not in our library10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7289

3. 3.

   Srour B, Fezeu LK, Kesse-Guyot E, Allès B, Méjean C, Andrianasolo RM, Chazelas E, Deschasaux M, Hercberg S, Galan P et al. Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Santé). BMJ. 2019;365:l1451.

   Not in our library10.1136/bmj.l1451

4. 4.

   Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, Cai H, Cassimatis T, Chen KY, Chung ST, Costa E, Courville A, Darcey V et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell Metab. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):67–77.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008

5. 5.

   Gibney MJ, Forde CG, Mullally D, Gibney ER Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(3):717–24.

   Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.117.160440

6. 6.

   Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, Moubarac JC, Louzada ML, Rauber F, Khandpur N, Cediel G, Neri D, Martinez-Steele E et al. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(5):936–41.

   Not in our library10.1017/s1368980018003762

7. 7.

   Bell EA, Castellanos VH, Pelkman CL, Thorwart ML, Rolls BJ Energy density of foods affects energy intake in normal-weight women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67(3):412–20.

   Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/67.3.412

8. 8.

   Rolls BJ The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake. Physiol Behav. 2009;97(5):609–15.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.011

9. 9.

   Kral TV, Roe LS, Rolls BJ Combined effects of energy density and portion size on energy intake in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(6):962–8.

   Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/79.6.962

10. 10.

    Kling SM, Roe LS, Keller KL, Rolls BJ Double trouble: portion size and energy density combine to increase preschool children's lunch intake. Physiol Behav. 2016;162:18–26.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.019

11. 11.

    Vernarelli JA, Mitchell DC, Rolls BJ, Hartman TJ Dietary energy density and obesity: how consumption patterns differ by body weight status. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57(1):351–61.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00394-016-1324-8

12. 12.

    Smethers AD, Roe LS, Sanchez CE, Zuraikat FM, Keller KL, Rolls BJ Both increases and decreases in energy density lead to sustained changes in preschool children's energy intake over 5 days. Physiol Behav. 2019;204:210–18.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.042

13. 13.

    Brunstrom JM, Drake AC, Forde CG, Rogers PJ Undervalued and ignored: are humans poorly adapted to energy-dense foods?. Appetite. 2018;120:589–95.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.015

14. 14.

    Rolls BJ, Bell EA, Castellanos VH, Chow M, Pelkman CL, Thorwart ML Energy density but not fat content of foods affected energy intake in lean and obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(5):863–71.

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/69.5.863

15. 15.

    De Wijk RA, Zijlstra N, Mars M, De Graaf C, Prinz JF The effects of food viscosity on bite size, bite effort and food intake. Physiol Behav. 2008;95(3):527–32.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.07.026

16. 16.

    Hogenkamp PS, Stafleu A, Mars M, Brunstrom JM, de Graaf C Texture, not flavor, determines expected satiation of dairy products. Appetite. 2011;57(3):635–41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.008

17. 17.

    Viskaal-van Dongen M, Kok FJ, de Graaf C Eating rate of commonly consumed foods promotes food and energy intake. Appetite. 2011;56(1):25–31.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.appet.2010.11.141

18. 18.

    Forde CG, Bolhuis D, Thaler T, Graaf CD, Martin N Influence of meal texture on eating rate and food intake: results from three ad-libitum trials. Appetite. 2013;71:474.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Forde CG, van Kuijk N, Thaler T, de Graaf C, Martin N Texture and savoury taste influences on food intake in a realistic hot lunch time meal. Appetite. 2013;60:180–6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.appet.2012.10.002

20. 20.

    Forde CG, van Kuijk N, Thaler T, de Graaf C, Martin N Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation. Appetite. 2013;60(0):208–19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.015

21. 21.

    Bolhuis DP, Forde CG, Cheng Y, Xu H, Martin N, de Graaf C Slow food: sustained impact of harder foods on the reduction in energy intake over the course of the day. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93370.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0093370

22. 22.

    McCrickerd K, Lim CM, Leong C, Chia EM, Forde CG Texture-based differences in eating rate reduce the impact of increased energy density and large portions on meal size in adults. J Nutr. 2017;147(6):1208–17.

    Not in our library10.3945/jn.116.244251

23. 23.

    Robinson E, Almiron-Roig E, Rutters F, de Graaf C, Forde CG, Tudur Smith C, Nolan SJ, Jebb SA A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of eating rate on energy intake and hunger. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):123–51.

    Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.113.081745

24. 24.

    Mourao DM, Bressan J, Campbell WW, Mattes RD Effects of food form on appetite and energy intake in lean and obese young adults. Int J Obes. 2007;31(11):1688–95.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.ijo.0803667

25. 25.

    Forde C, Leong C, Chia-Ming E, McCrickerd K Fast or slow-foods? Describing natural variations in oral processing characteristics across a wide range of Asian foods. Food Function. 2017;8(2):595–606.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6fo01286h

26. 26.

    De Graaf C, Kok FJ Slow food, fast food and the control of food intake. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6(5):290–3.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrendo.2010.41

27. 27.

    Forde CG. From perception to ingestion; the role of sensory properties in energy selection, eating behaviour and food intake. Food Qual Preference. 2018;66:171–7.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Wee MSM, Goh AT, Stieger M, Forde CG Correlation of instrumental texture properties from textural profile analysis (TPA) with eating behaviours and macronutrient composition for a wide range of solid foods. Food Function. 2018;9(10):5301–12.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8fo00791h

29. 29.

    van den Boer JHW, Werts M, Siebelink E, de Graaf C, Mars M The availability of slow and fast foods in the Dutch diet: the current situation and opportunities for interventions. Foods. 2017;6(10):87.

    Not in our library10.3390/foods6100087

30. 30.

    Ferriday D, Bosworth ML, Godinot N, Martin N, Forde CG, Van Den Heuvel E, Appleton SL, Mercer Moss FJ, Rogers PJ, Brunstrom JM Variation in the oral processing of everyday meals is associated with fullness and meal size; a potential nudge to reduce energy intake?. Nutrients. 2016;8(5):315.

    Not in our library10.3390/nu8050315

31. 31.

    van Rossum CT, Fransen HP, Verkaik-Kloosterman J, Buurma-Rethans EJ, Ocke MC Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007–2010: diet of children and adults aged 7 to 69 years. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2011.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Steele EM, Juul F, Neri D, Rauber F, Monteiro CA Dietary share of ultra-processed foods and metabolic syndrome in the US adult population. Prev Med. 2019;125:40–8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.004

33. 33.

    Karl JP, Young AJ, Rood JC, Montain SJ Independent and combined effects of eating rate and energy density on energy intake, appetite, and gut hormones. Obesity. 2013;21(3):E244–52.

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.20075

34. 34.

    Ohkuma T, Hirakawa Y, Nakamura U, Kiyohara Y, Kitazono T, Ninomiya T Association between eating rate and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2015;39:1589–96.

    Not in our library10.1038/ijo.2015.96

35. 35.

    Teo PS, Forde CG The impact of eating rate on energy intake, body composition and health. In: Meiselman HL editor. Handbook of eating and drinking: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019, p. 1–27.

    Not in our library

36. 36.
    Self-reported eating rate is associated with weight status in a Dutch population: a validation study and a cross-sectional study · 2017

    Not checked
37. 37.

    de Graaf C Texture and satiation: the role of oro-sensory exposure time. Physiol Behav. 2012;107(4):496–501.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.008

38. 38.

    Bolhuis DP, Lakemond C, De Wijk R, Luning P, De Graaf C Both longer oral sensory exposure to and higher intensity of saltiness decrease ad libitum food intake in healthy normal-weight men. J Nutr. 2011;141(12):2242–8.

    Not in our library10.3945/jn.111.143867

39. 39.
    The impact of food viscosity on eating rate, subjective appetite, glycemic response and gastric emptying rate. · 2013

    Not checked
40. 40.

    Zhu Y, Hsu WH, Hollis JH Increasing the number of masticatory cycles is associated with reduced appetite and altered postprandial plasma concentrations of gut hormones, insulin and glucose. Br J Nutr. 2013;110(2):384–90.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0007114512005053

41. 41.

    Zijlstra N, de Wijk RA, Mars M, Stafleu A, de Graaf C Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(2):269–75.

    Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.2009.27694

42. 42.

    Zijlstra N, Mars M, de Wijk RA, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Holst JJ, de Graaf C Effect of viscosity on appetite and gastro-intestinal hormones. Physiol Behav. 2009;97(1):68–75.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.001

43. 43.

    Weijzen PL, Liem DG, Zandstra EH, de Graaf C Sensory specific satiety and intake: the difference between nibble- and bar-size snacks. Appetite. 2008;50(2-3):435–42.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.008

44. 44.

    Llewellyn C, Van Jaarsveld C, Boniface D, Carnell S, Wardle J Eating rate is a heritable phenotype related to weight in children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(6):1560–6.

    Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.2008.26175

45. 45.

    Berkowitz RI, Moore RH, Faith MS, Stallings VA, Kral TV, Stunkard AJ Identification of an obese eating style in 4‐year‐old children born at high and low risk for obesity. Obesity. 2010;18(3):505–12.

    Not in our library10.1038/oby.2009.299

46. 46.

    Fogel A, Fries LR, McCrickerd K, Goh AT, Quah PL, Chan MJ, Toh JY, Chong YS, Tan KH, Yap F et al. Oral processing behaviours that promote children's energy intake are associated with parent-reported appetitive traits: results from the GUSTO cohort. Appetite. 2018;126:8–15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.appet.2018.03.011

47. 47.

    Fogel A, Goh AT, Fries LR, Sadananthan SA, Velan SS, Michael N, Tint MT, Fortier MV, Chan MJ, Toh JY et al. A description of an ‘obesogenic' eating style that promotes higher energy intake and is associated with greater adiposity in 4.5 year-old children: results from the GUSTO cohort. Physiol Behav. 2017;176:107–16.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.013

48. 48.

    Fogel A, Goh AT, Fries LR, Sadananthan SA, Velan SS, Michael N, Tint MT, Fortier MV, Chan MJ, Toh JY et al. Faster eating rates are associated with higher energy intakes during an ad libitum meal, higher BMI and greater adiposity among 4.5-year-old children: results from the growing up in Singapore towards healthy outcomes (GUSTO) cohort. Br J Nutr. 2017;117(7):1042–51.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0007114517000848

49. 49.

    Forde CG, Fogel A, McCrickerd K Children's eating behaviors and energy intake: overlapping influences and opportunities for intervention. In: Nurturing a healthy generation of children: Research gaps and opportunities. Henry CJ, Nicklas T, Nicklaus S editors. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2019, p. 55–67.

    Not in our library10.1159/000493695

50. 50.

    McCrickerd K, Forde CG Consistency of eating rate, oral processing behaviours and energy intake across meals. Nutrients. 2017;9(8):891.

    Not in our library10.3390/nu9080891

51. 51.

    Ford AL, Bergh C, Södersten P, Sabin MA, Hollinghurst S, Hunt LP, Hamilton-Sheild J Treatment of childhood obesity by retraining eating behaviour: randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Online). 2010;340:b5388.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.b5388

52. 52.

    Hermsen S, Mars M, Higgs S, Frost JH, Hermans RC Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):90.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12966-019-0857-7

53. 53.

    Forde CG Flavour perception and satiation. 2nd ed.Amsterdam: Woodhead Publishing; 2016.

    Not in our library

54. 54.

    Carmody RN, Weintraub GS, Wrangham RW Energetic consequences of thermal and nonthermal food processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(48):19199–203.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1112128108

55. 55.

    Hitzmann B, Ahmad MH Measurement, modeling and automation in advanced food processing. Cham: Springer; 2017.

    Not in our library

56. 56.

    Rolls BJ Dietary energy density: applying behavioural science to weight management. Nutr Bull. 2017;42(3):246–53.

    Not in our library10.1111/nbu.12280

57. 57.
    Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies · 2015

    No notice
58. 58.

    Scrinis G, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods and the limits of product reformulation. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):247–52.

    Not in our library10.1017/s1368980017001392

59. 59.

    Aguayo-Mendoza MG, Ketel EC, van der Linden E, Forde CG, Piqueras-Fiszman B, Stieger M Oral processing behavior of drinkable, spoonable and chewable foods is primarily determined by rheological and mechanical food properties. Food Qual Preference. 2019;71:87–95.

    Not in our library

60. 60.

    Van Boekel M, Fogliano V, Pellegrini N, Stanton C, Scholz G, Lalljie S, Somoza V, Knorr D, Jasti PR, Eisenbrand G A review on the beneficial aspects of food processing. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010;54(9):1215–47.

    Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.200900608

61. 61.

    Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet North Am Ed. 2019;393(10170):447–92.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4

62. 62.

    Gustafson D, Gutman A, Leet W, Drewnowski A, Fanzo J, Ingram J Seven food system metrics of sustainable nutrition security. Sustainability. 2016;8(3):196.

    Not in our library

63. 63.

    McCrickerd K, Forde C Sensory influences on food intake control: moving beyond palatability. Obes Rev. 2016;17(1):18–29.

    Not in our library10.1111/obr.12340

Cited by papers we hold 7

• Influence of Sensory Properties in Moderating Eating Behaviors and Food Intake · 2022
  Not checked
• Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies · 2022
  No notice
• Ultra-processed foods: how functional is the NOVA system? · 2022
  No notice
• The Role of Diet Quality in Mediating the Association between Ultra-Processed Food Intake, Obesity and Health-Related Outcomes: A Review of Prospective Cohort Studies · 2021
  No notice
• Healthy Choices for Healthy Hearts: How Front-of-Pack Food Labeling Can Help Reverse the Global Obesity Epidemic · 2020
  Not checked
• Ultra-processed food consumption and obesity in the Australian adult population · 2020
  No notice
• Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of obesity: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank · 2020
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.