Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study

Christopher D Whelan, Andre Altmann, Juan A Botía and 88 more

Brain · 2018 · CC BY

doi:10.1093/brain/awx341

Abstract

Progressive functional decline in the epilepsies is largely unexplained. We formed the ENIGMA-Epilepsy consortium to understand factors that influence brain measures in epilepsy, pooling data from 24 research centres in 14 countries across Europe, North and South America, Asia, and Australia. Structural brain measures were extracted from MRI brain scans across 2149 individuals with epilepsy, divided into four epilepsy subgroups including idiopathic generalized epilepsies (n =367), mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE; left, n = 415; right, n = 339), and all other epilepsies in aggregate (n = 1026), and compared to 1727 matched healthy controls. We ranked brain structures in order of greatest differences between patients and controls, by meta-analysing effect sizes across 16 subcortical and 68 cortical brain regions. We also tested effects of duration of disease, age at onset, and age-by-diagnosis interactions on structural measures. We observed widespread patterns of altered subcortical volume and reduced cortical grey matter thickness. Compared to controls, all epilepsy groups showed lower volume in the right thalamus (Cohen's d = -0.24 to -0.73; P < 1.49 × 10-4), and lower thickness in the precentral gyri bilaterally (d = -0.34 to -0.52; P < 4.31 × 10-6). Both MTLE subgroups showed profound volume reduction in the ipsilateral hippocampus (d = -1.73 to -1.91, P < 1.4 × 10-19), and lower thickness in extrahippocampal cortical regions, including the precentral and paracentral gyri, compared to controls (d = -0.36 to -0.52; P < 1.49 × 10-4). Thickness differences of the ipsilateral temporopolar, parahippocampal, entorhinal, and fusiform gyri, contralateral pars triangularis, and bilateral precuneus, superior frontal and caudal middle frontal gyri were observed in left, but not right, MTLE (d = -0.29 to -0.54; P < 1.49 × 10-4). Contrastingly, thickness differences of the ipsilateral pars opercularis, and contralateral transverse temporal gyrus, were observed in right, but not left, MTLE (d = -0.27 to -0.51; P < 1.49 × 10-4). Lower subcortical volume and cortical thickness associated with a longer duration of epilepsy in the all-epilepsies, all-other-epilepsies, and right MTLE groups (beta, b < -0.0018; P < 1.49 × 10-4). In the largest neuroimaging study of epilepsy to date, we provide information on the common epilepsies that could not be realistically acquired in any other way. Our study provides a robust ranking of brain measures that can be further targeted for study in genetic and neuropathological studies. This worldwide initiative identifies patterns of shared grey matter reduction across epilepsy syndromes, and distinctive abnormalities between epilepsy syndromes, which inform our understanding of epilepsy as a network disorder, and indicate that certain epilepsy syndromes involve more widespread structural compromise than previously assumed.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder, comprising many different syndromes and conditions, affecting 0.6–1.5% of the population worldwide. Approximately one-third of affected individuals do not respond to antiepileptic drug therapy. Alternative treatment options may not be appropriate, and are not always effective. The identification of shared biological disease pathways may help elucidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets, which, in turn, could help to optimize individual treatment. However, disease biology remains unexplained for most cases—especially in commonly occurring epilepsies.

Epilepsy is a network disorder typically involving widespread structural alterations beyond the putative epileptic focus. Hippocampal sclerosis is a common pathological substrate of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), but extrahippocampal abnormalities are also frequently observed in MTLE, notably in the thalamus and neocortex. Neocortical abnormalities are also reported in idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE), and many childhood syndromes. Thus, common epilepsies may be characterized by shared disturbances in distributed cortico-subcortical brain networks, but the pattern, consistency and cause of these disturbances, and how they relate to functional decline, are largely unknown.

Currently, we lack reliable data from large cross-sectional neuroimaging, brain tissue, or biomarker studies in the common epilepsies. Brain tissue is not available from large cohorts of patients: common forms of epilepsy are often unsuitable for surgical treatment, so biopsied tissues are simply unavailable in sufficient numbers for research into disease biology. Brain-wide post-mortem studies also require extensive effort for comprehensive analysis. MRI offers detailed information on brain structure, but MRI measures from groups of individuals with and without epilepsy are not always consistent. For example, MTLE is associated with hippocampal sclerosis in up to 70% of brain MRI scans. However, the effects of laterality, and the extent of extrahippocampal grey matter loss are inconsistently reported in studies of left versus right MTLE. Similarly, abnormalities of the basal ganglia, hippocampus, lateral ventricles, and neocortex have all been reported in IGE, but most alterations are non-specific, and visual inspection of clinical MRI in IGE is typically normal. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic variants associated with complex epilepsies by ‘lumping’ different epilepsy types together, but MRI studies are typically of smaller scale, and have not widely explored whether distinct epilepsy syndromes share common structural abnormalities.

There are many sources of inconsistency in previously reported MRI findings. First, epileptic seizures and syndromes are diverse; classifications are often revised and contested. Second, most cross-sectional brain imaging studies are based on small samples (typically <50 cases), limiting the power to detect subtle group differences. Third, variability in scanning protocols, image processing, and statistical analysis may affect the sensitivity of brain measures across studies.

The Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium was formed to address these issues. ENIGMA is a global initiative, combining large samples with coordinated image processing, and integrating genomic and MRI data across hundreds of research centres worldwide. Prior ENIGMA studies have identified genetic variants associated with variations in brain structure, and have reliably characterized patterns of brain abnormalities in schizophrenia, major depression (, obsessive compulsive disorder (, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (, and many other brain illnesses. Large-scale, collaborative initiatives such as ENIGMA may improve our understanding of epilepsy, helping clinicians make more informed decisions and provide personalized treatment strategies. Thus, we formed the Epilepsy Working Group of ENIGMA (‘ENIGMA-Epilepsy’) to apply coordinated, well-powered studies of imaging and genetic data in epilepsy.

Here, in the largest analysis of structural brain abnormalities in epilepsy to date, we ranked effect sizes for 16 subcortical and 68 cortical brain regions in 2149 individuals with epilepsy and 1727 healthy controls, using harmonized image processing, quality control, and meta-analysis. First, we grouped all epilepsies together, to determine whether biologically distinct syndromes show robust, common structural deficits. Second, we assessed a well-characterized form of epilepsy: MTLE with hippocampal sclerosis, analysing patients with left- and right-sided hippocampal sclerosis as independent groups. Third, we examined another major set of epilepsy syndromes: IGE. Finally, we studied all remaining epilepsies as a combined subgroup, to understand the relative contributions of IGE, MTLE-L, MTLE-R, and all other syndromes on shared patterns of structural compromise. We tested how age at scan, age of onset, and epilepsy duration affected brain structural measures. Based on existing neuroimaging, neurophysiological, neuropathological, and genetic data, we predicted that (i) biologically distinct epilepsy syndromes would exhibit shared patterns of structural abnormalities; (ii) MTLEs with left or right hippocampal sclerosis would show distinct patterns of hippocampal and extrahippocampal structural deficits; and (iii) IGEs would also display subcortical volume and cortical thickness differences, compared to healthy controls.

Materials and methods

Each centre received approval from their local institutional review board or ethics committee. Written informed consent was provided according to local requirements (Supplementary Table 1).

Participants

Twenty-four cross-sectional samples from 14 countries were included in the study, totalling 2149 people with epilepsy and 1727 research centre-matched healthy control subjects (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The locations, dates, and periods of participant recruitment are provided in Supplementary Table 1. An epilepsy specialist assessed seizure and syndrome classifications at each centre, using International League Against Epilepsy terminology. Participants were aged 18–55.

To test for shared and syndrome-specific structural alterations, analyses included one group combining all epilepsies (‘all-epilepsies’; n = 2149), and four stratified subgroups: (i) left MTLE with left hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-L; n = 415); (ii) right MTLE with right hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-R; n = 339); (iii) IGE (n = 367); and (iv) all other epilepsies (n = 1028). Supplementary Table 2 lists all syndromic diagnoses included in the aggregate ‘all-epilepsies’ group. For the MTLE subgroups, we included anyone with the typical electroclinical constellation, and a neuroradiologically-confirmed diagnosis of unilateral hippocampal sclerosis on clinical MRI. Participants were included in the IGE subgroup if they presented with tonic-clonic, absence or myoclonic seizures with generalized spike-wave discharges on EEG. Participants were included in the ‘all-other-epilepsies’ subgroup if they were diagnosed with non-lesional MTLE (43.3%), occipital (1.67%), frontal (8.78%), or parietal lobe epilepsy (0.84%), focal epilepsies not otherwise specified (37.03%), or another unclassified syndrome (8.37%; Supplementary Table 2). We excluded participants with a progressive disease (e.g. Rasmussen’s encephalitis), malformations of cortical development, tumours or previous neurosurgery.

MRI data collection and processing

Structural T1-weighted MRI brain scans were collected at the 24 participating centres. Scanning details are provided in Supplementary Table 3. T1-weighted images from cases and controls were analysed at each site using FreeSurfer 5.3.0, for automated analysis of brain structure. Volumetric measures were extracted for 12 subcortical grey matter regions (six left and six right, including the amygdala, caudate, nucleus accumbens, pallidum, putamen, and thalamus), the left and right hippocampi, and the left and right lateral ventricles. Cortical thickness measures were extracted for 34 left-hemispheric grey matter regions, and 34 right-hemispheric grey matter regions (68 total; Supplementary Table 4). Visual inspections of subcortical and cortical segmentations were conducted following standardized ENIGMA protocols (http://enigma.usc.edu), used in prior genetic studies of brain structure, and large-scale case-control studies of neuropsychiatric illnesses. Analysts were blind to participants’ diagnoses. Each analyst was instructed to execute a series of standardized bash scripts, identifying participants with volumetric or thickness measures greater or less than 1.5 times the interquartile range as outliers. Outlier data were then visually inspected, by overlaying the participant’s cortical segmentations on their whole-brain anatomical images. If the blinded local analyst judged any structure as inaccurately segmented, that structure was omitted from the analysis. The Supplementary material provides further information.

Participant demographics

All research centres tested for differences in age between individuals with epilepsy and controls using an unpaired, two-tailed t-test in the R statistics package (https://www.r-project.org). Each centre also tested for sex differences between individuals with epilepsy and controls using a chi-squared test in SPSS Statistics package (IBM Corp., Version 21.0).

Meta-analytical group comparisons

Each research centre tested for case-versus-control differences using multiple linear regressions (via the lm function implemented in R), where a binary indicator of diagnosis (0 = healthy control, 1 = person with epilepsy) was the predictor of interest, and the volume or thickness of a specified brain region was the outcome measure. We calculated effect size estimates across all brain regions using Cohen’s d, adjusting for age, sex and intracranial volume (ICV). ICV is a reliable, indirect measure of head size, used as a covariate in other large-scale ENIGMA collaborations. Cohen’s d effect sizes and regression beta coefficients were pooled across centres using a random-effects, restricted maximum likelihood method of meta-analysis via the R package, metafor. The Supplementary material provides additional details.

Meta-analytical regression with clinical variables

Each centre conducted a series of linear regressions, testing the association between subcortical volume or cortical thickness, and: (i) age at onset of epilepsy; and (ii) duration of epilepsy. All centres tested for interactions between diagnosis of epilepsy (including syndrome groups) and age at time of scan. Beta values representing the unstandardized slopes of each regression were extracted for each analysis. Sex and ICV were included as covariates in all secondary analyses.

Correction for multiple comparisons

We conducted four independent regressions (one case versus control regression, and three regressions with clinical variables) across 84 regions of interest, adjusting the statistical significance threshold to Pthresh < 1.49 × 10−4 to correct for 336 comparisons. To account for correlations between tests, we also applied a less conservative adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR), using the Benjamini and Hochberg method. For clarity, we report only P-values significant after stringent Bonferroni correction; FDR-adjusted P-values are summarized in the Supplementary material.

Power analyses

Across all regions of interest, we calculated the sample sizes necessary to achieve 80% power to detect case-control differences, given the observed effect sizes at each region of interest, based on two-tailed t-tests, using G*Power Version 3.1. For each region of interest, we also estimated N80: the total number of samples required, per group, to achieve 80% power to detect group differences using a t-test at the threshold of P < 0.05 (two-tailed).

Participant demographics

The sample size-weighted mean age across all epilepsy samples was 34.4 (range: 26.2–40) years, and the weighted mean age of healthy controls was 33.3 (range: 25.2–42.3) years. The weighted mean age at onset of epilepsy and duration of epilepsy were 17.6 (range: 12.1–28.2) years and 17.4 (range: 8.3–28) years, respectively. Females comprised 57% of the total epilepsy sample (range: 34–75% by individual sample), and 53% of the controls (range: 31–71% by individual sample). Case-control differences in age were observed at 8 of 24 research centres, and case-control differences in sex were observed at 2 of 24 research centres (Supplementary Table 5); hence, age and sex were included as covariates in all group comparisons.

Volumetric findings

Compared to controls, the aggregate all-epilepsies group exhibited lower volumes in the left (d = −0.36; P = 1.31 × 10−6) and right thalamus (d = −0.37; P = 7.67 × 10−14), left (d = −0.35; P = 3.04 × 10−7) and right hippocampus (d = −0.34; P = 6.63 × 10−10), and the right pallidum (d = −0.32; P = 8.32 × 10−9). Conversely, the left (d = 0.29; P = 2.14 × 10−12) and right (d = 0.27; P = 3.73 × 10−15) lateral ventricles were enlarged across all epilepsies when compared to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2A). A supplementary analysis of all-epilepsies, excluding individuals with hippocampal sclerosis or other lesions, revealed similar patterns of volume loss in the right thalamus and pallidum, and bilaterally enlarged ventricles; however, volume differences were not observed in the hippocampus (Supplementary Table 6).

The MTLE-L subgroup showed lower volumes in the left hippocampus (d = −1.73; P = 1.35 × 10−19), left (d = P = 2.19 × 10−11) and right thalamus (d = −0.46; P = 8.12 × 10−5), left putamen (d = −0.39; P = 1.07 × 10−6), and right pallidum (d = −0.45; P = 5.48 × 10−7). As in the overall group comparison, we observed larger left (d = 0.47; P = 1.96 × 10−7) and right lateral ventricles (d = 0.36; P = 8.95 × 10−5) in MTLE-L patients relative to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2B).

The MTLE-R subgroup showed lower volumes across a number of regions in the right hemisphere only, including the hippocampus (d = −1.91; P = 6.36 × 10−37), thalamus (d = −0.73; P = 1.6 × 10−12), and pallidum (d = −0.45; P = 3.96 × 10−7), together with increased volumes of the left (d = 0.39; P = 1.52 × 10−6) and right lateral ventricles (d = 0.44; P = 6.57 × 10−12) compared to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2C).

The IGE subgroup showed lower volumes in the right thalamus (d = −0.4; P = 3.6 × 10−6) compared to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2D).

The all-other-epilepsies subgroup showed lower volumes in the right thalamus (d = −0.31; P = 7.9 × 10−11) and the right pallidum (d = −0.24; P = 8.1 × 10−5) compared to controls. The all-other-epilepsies subgroup also showed significant enlargements of the left (d = 0.33; P = 5.1 × 10−7) and right amygdala (d = 0.22; P = 1.46 × 10−4), and the left (d = 0.2; P = 1.2 × 10−5) and right lateral ventricles (d = 0.21; P = 4.62 × 10−6) compared to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2E).

All volume differences can be visualized using the interactive ENIGMA-Viewer tool, at http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_subcortical.html (Supplementary material). Volume differences significant after FDR adjustment can also be visualized at http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_subcortical_fdr.html (Supplementary Tables 26–30).

Cortical thickness findings

The all-epilepsies group showed reduced thickness of cortical grey matter across seven regions bilaterally, including the left (d = −0.38; P = 1.82 × 10−18) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.4; P = 8.85 × 10−20), left (d = −0.32; P = 2.11 × 10−15) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (d = −0.31; P = 2.09 × 10−9), left (d = −0.31; P = 2.05 × 10−6) and right paracentral gyri (d = −0.32; P = 2.19 × 10−9), left (d = −0.19; P = 1.29 × 10−4) and right pars triangularis (d = −0.2; P = 4.25 × 10−8), left (d = −0.28; P = 1.51 × 10−7) and right superior frontal gyri (d = −0.27; P = 4.49 × 10−6), left (d = −0.19; P = 1.05 × 10−5) and right transverse temporal gyri (d = −0.18; P = 2.81 × 10−5), and left (d = −0.23; P = 9.87 × 10−5) and right supramarginal gyri (d = −0.22; P = 5.24 × 10−5). The all-epilepsies group also showed unilaterally thinner right cuneus (d = −0.2; P = 9.68 × 10−8), right pars opercularis (d = −0.18; P = 6.48 × 10−7), right precuneus (d = −0.28; P = 2.7 × 10−5), and left entorhinal gyrus (d = −0.26; P = 2.04 × 10−5), compared to healthy controls (Table 3 and Fig. 3A). Supplementary analysis in a non-lesional epilepsy subgroup revealed a similar pattern of cortical thickness differences compared to controls, suggesting that the changes observed in our main analysis were not driven by the inclusion of patients with hippocampal sclerosis or other common lesions (Supplementary Table 7).

The MTLE-L and MTLE-R subgroups showed distinct patterns of cortical thickness reductions when compared to healthy controls (Table 3, Fig. 3B and C). In MTLE-R, lower cortical thickness was reported across four motor regions, including the left (d = −0.51; P = 7.67 × 10−7) and right paracentral gyri (d = −0.42; P = 6.24 × 10−11), and the left (d = −0.42; P = 4.31 × 10−6) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.52; P = 1.25 × 10−9). The MTLE-R subgroup also showed thickness changes in the left transverse temporal gyrus (d = −0.31; P = 2.15 × 10−5), and right pars opercularis (d = −0.27; P = 1.45 × 10−4) (Table 3 and Fig. 3C). By contrast, in MTLE-L, lower thickness was observed across six regions of the motor cortex, including the left (d = −0.43; P = 1.61 × 10−5) and right paracentral gyri (d = −0.38; P = 5.14 × 10−7), left (d = −0.47; P = 8.64 × 10−9) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.49; P = 2.37 × 10−10), and left (d = −0.54; P = 7.35 × 10−5) and right precuneus (d = −0.47; P = 5.16 × 10−6). The MTLE-L group also showed thickness changes across five regions of the frontal cortex, including the left (d = −0.41; P = 1.02 × 10−11) and right superior frontal gyri (d = −0.37; P = 1.44 × 10−9), left (d = −0.4; P = 7.07 × 10−9) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (d = −0.44; P = 3.61 × 10−7), and the right pars triangularis (d = −0.29; P = 2.16 × 10−6). In MTLE-L, thickness alterations were also observed in four regions of the temporal cortex, including the left temporopolar cortex (d = −0.32; P = 3.33 × 10−6), left parahippocampal gyrus (d = −0.3; P = 3.95 × 10−5), left entorhinal gyrus (d = −0.45; P = 7.35 × 10−10), and left fusiform gyrus (d = −0.36; P = 2.19 × 10−7) (Table 3 and Fig. 3B).

The IGE subgroup showed reduced thickness in the left (d = −0.34; P = 1.75 × 10−6) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.39; P = 5.27 × 10−8), when compared to healthy controls (Table 3 and Fig. 3D).

The all-other-epilepsies subgroup showed lower thickness across six cortical regions bilaterally, including the left (d = −0.38; P = 1.76 × 10−16) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.35; P = 1.7 × 10−14), left (d = −0.26; P = 1.34 × 10−8) and right paracentral gyri (d = −0.35; P = 1.1 × 10−14), left (d = −0.29; P = 1.32 × 10−10) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (d = −0.21; P = 2.62 × 10−6), left (d = −0.22; P = 7.27 × 10−7) and right superior parietal gyri (d = −0.22; P = 1.15 × 10−6), left (d = −0.24; P = 3.51 × 10−5) and right superior frontal gyri (d = −0.23; P = 7.15 × 10−6), and the left (d = −0.18; P = 1.34 × 10−4) and right precuneus (d = −0.24; P = 7.78 × 10−6) compared to controls. The all-other-epilepsies group also showed unilaterally reduced thickness in six right hemispheric regions, including the cuneus (d = −0.23; P = 2.15 × 10−7), lateral occipital gyrus (d = −0.21; P = 3.18 × 10−6), pars triangularis (d = −0.21; P = 3.32 × 10−6), supramarginal gyrus (d = −0.21; P = 9.95 × 10−6), transverse temporal gyrus (d = −0.18; P = 6.84 × 10−5), and lingual gyrus (d = −0.18; P = 7.12 × 10−5), compared to controls (Table 3 and Fig. 3E).

An interactive 3D visualization of these results is available via the ENIGMA-Viewer tool, at http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_cortical.html (Supplementary material). Cortical thickness differences significant after FDR adjustment can also be visualized at http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_cortical_fdr.html (Supplementary Tables 31–35).

Duration of illness, age at onset, and age-by-diagnosis effects on brain abnormalities

A secondary analysis identified significant associations between duration of epilepsy and several affected brain regions in the all-epilepsies, MTLE-R, and all-other-epilepsies groups. In the all-epilepsies group, duration of epilepsy negatively associated with volume measures in the left hippocampus (b = −8.32; P = 8.16 × 10−13), left (b = −13.58; P = 3.52 × 10−15), and right thalamus (b = −12.25; P = 1.58 × 10−13), and right pallidum (b = −2.67; P = 1.78 × 10−7), in addition to bilateral thickness measures in the left (b = −0.003; P = 2.99 × 10−11) and right pars triangularis (b = −0.002; P = 4.24 × 10−9), left (b = −0.003; P = 1.61 × 10−15) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 1.65 × 10−17), left (b = −0.003; P = 1.77 × 10−13) and right supramarginal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 2.58 × 10−19), left (b = −0.003; P = 5.84 × 10− 12) and right precentral gyri (b = −0.003; P = 2.54 × 10−24), left (b = −0.004; P = 1.94 × 10−12) and right superior frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 4.65 × 10−11), left (b = −0.004; P = 1.05 × 10−10) and right transverse temporal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 8.24 × 10−10), and left (b = −0.002; P = 5.22 × 10−6) and right paracentral gyri (b = −0.002; P = 5.63 × 10−6). Duration of epilepsy also negatively associated with unilateral thickness measures in the right precuneus (b = −0.003; P = 6.03 × 10−21), right pars opercularis (b = −0.003; P = 5.59 × 10−13), and right cuneus (b = −0.002; P = 1.1 × 10−9; Supplementary Table 8). In the MTLE-R subgroup, duration of epilepsy negatively associated with volume measures in the right hippocampus (b = −22.42; P = 1.1 × 10−7), and the right thalamus (b = −18.11; P = 1.84 × 10−5), and thickness measures in the left transverse temporal gyrus (b = −0.007; P = 8.39 × 10−5; Supplementary Table 8). In the all-other-epilepsies subgroup, duration of epilepsy negatively associated with bilateral thickness measures in the left (b = −0.003; P = 3.39 × 10−7) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 6.91 × 10−8), left (b = −0.003; P = 1.36 × 10−9) and right superior frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 3.16 × 10−7), and the left (b = −0.003; P = 3.17 × 10−5) and right precuneus (b = −0.003; P = 5.01 × 10−9), in addition to unilateral thickness measures in the right precentral gyrus (b = −0.004; P = 1.16 × 10−12), right cuneus (b = −0.003; P = 8.57 × 10−8), right pars triangularis (b = −0.003; P = 5.16 × 10−7), and right supramarginal gyrus (b = −0.003; P = 2.24 × 10−7). Duration of epilepsy also showed a positive association with the size of the left lateral ventricle in the all-other-epilepsies group (b = 13.6; P = 1.17 × 10−5).

In the all-epilepsies group, age at onset of epilepsy negatively associated with thickness measures in the left (b = −0.003; P = 2.66 × 10−15) and right superior frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 9.77 × 10−10), left (b = −0.003; P = 2.78 × 10−9) and right pars triangularis (b = −0.003; P = 6.51 × 10−7), right pars opercularis (b = −0.003; P = 5.4 × 10−14), left transverse temporal gyrus (b = −0.003; P = 1.03 × 10−8), and right cuneus (b = −0.001; P = 4.9 × 10−6). In the all-other-epilepsies subgroup, age at onset negatively correlated with thickness measures in the left (b = −0.003; P = 3.21 × 10−8) and right superior frontal gyri (b = −0.002; P = 1.18 × 10−4), left (b = −0.002; P = 8.42 × 10−6) and right precuneus (b = −0.002; P = 7.23 × 10−5), right pars triangularis (b = −0.003; P = 2.53 × 10−5), and right supramarginal gyrus (b = −0.002; P = 2.38 × 10−6). Age at onset also positively associated with the size of the right lateral ventricle in the all-other-epilepsies subgroup (b = 57.73; P = 1.62 × 10−7).

Age at onset negatively associated with other regional volumetric and thickness measures in the all-epilepsies, IGE, MTLE-L, MTLE-R, and all-other-epilepsies groups, but these associated areas showed no significant structural differences in the primary case-control analysis (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 8).

There were no interaction effects between age and syndromic diagnosis in the all-epilepsies, MTLE-L, MTLE-R, IGE, or all-other-epilepsies groups.

Power analyses for detection of case-control differences

In our sample of 2149 individuals with epilepsy and 1727 healthy controls, we had 80% power to detect Cohen’s d effect sizes as small as d = 0.091 at the standard alpha level of P < 0.05 (two-tailed), and 80% power to detect Cohen’s d effect sizes as small as d = 0.149 at the study’s stringent Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 1.49 × 10−4.

N80, the number of cases and controls required to achieve 80% power to detect group differences using a two-tailed t-test at P < 0.05, ranged from N80 = 6, to detect group effects in the right hippocampus in our MTLE-R group, to N80 = 503, to detect group effects in the right pars opercularis in our ‘all epilepsies’ group (Tables 2 and 3).

Discussion

In the largest coordinated neuroimaging study of epilepsy to date, we identified a series of quantitative imaging signatures—some shared across common epilepsy syndromes, and others characteristic of selected, specific epilepsy syndromes. Our sample of 2149 individuals with epilepsy and 1727 controls provided 80% power to detect differences as small as d = 0.091 (P < 0.05, two-tailed), allowing us to identify subtle, consistent brain abnormalities that are typically undetectable on visual inspection, or overlooked using smaller case-control designs. This international collaboration addresses prior inconsistencies in the field of epilepsy neuroimaging, providing a robust, in vivo map of structural aberrations, upon which future studies of disease mechanisms may expand.

In the first of five cross-sectional MRI analyses, we investigated a diverse aggregation of epilepsy syndromes, putative causes, and durations of disease. This all-epilepsies group exhibited shared, diffuse brain structural differences across several regions including the thalamus, pallidum, precentral, paracentral, and superior frontal cortices. With the exception of hippocampal volume and entorhinal thickness differences (Supplementary material), these structural alterations were not driven by any specific syndrome or dataset (Supplementary Figs 3 and 7). Our findings suggest a common neuroanatomical signature of epilepsy across a wide spectrum of disease types, complementing recent evidence for shared genetic susceptibility to a wide spectrum of epilepsies. Some structural and genetic pathways may be shared across syndromes, despite the heterogeneity of epilepsy and seizure types. This shared MRI signature underpins the contemporary shift towards the study of epilepsies as network phenomena.

In MTLE, as expected, we observed hippocampal volume abnormalities ipsilateral to the patient’s side of seizure onset. Neither MTLE-L nor MTLE-R showed significant contralateral hippocampal volume reductions, confirming that sporadic, unilateral MTLE is not routinely underpinned by bilateral hippocampal damage. Both MTLE groups showed extrahippocampal abnormalities in the ipsilateral thalamus and pallidum, with widespread reductions in cortical thickness, supporting a growing body of literature indicating that MTLE, as an example of a specific disease constellation in the epilepsies, is also a network disease, extending beyond the mesial temporal regions. Disruption of this network, notably in the thalamus and thalamo-temporal white matter tracts, may be associated with postoperative seizure outcome in MTLE.

Patients with left and right MTLE showed distinct patterns of structural abnormalities when compared to controls, resolving conflicting findings from smaller studies, some reporting an equal distribution of structural differences, and others indicating more diffuse abnormalities, either in left MTLE or in right MTLE. The structural differences observed in the present study may reflect a younger age at onset of epilepsy in left MTLE, which occurred, on average, 1.2 years earlier than those with right MTLE (Supplementary Table 20). Independent, large-scale studies of MTLE patients have confirmed a significantly earlier age at onset in left, compared to right, MTLE. Duration-related effects were also observed in right, but not left, MTLE, pointing to possible biological distinctions between the two.

In IGE, a clinically and biologically distinct group of epilepsies typically associated with ‘normal’ MRI on clinical inspection, we identified reduced volume of the right thalamus, and thinner precentral gyri in both hemispheres, supporting prior reports of structural, electroencephalographic, and functional abnormalities in IGE. These IGE cases were considered typical by reviewing neurologists, suggesting that this common type of epilepsy is also associated with quantifiable structural brain abnormalities.

The precentral gyri, site of the primary motor cortex, showed bilateral structural deficits across all epilepsy groups (all-epilepsies, IGE, MTLE-L, MTLE-R, and all-other-epilepsies), without detectable inter-cohort or between-disease heterogeneity (Supplementary Figs 3–12). Atrophy of the motor cortex has been linked to seizure frequency and duration of epilepsy in MTLE; here, we observed a negative correlation between precentral (and postcentral) grey matter thickness and duration of epilepsy in the aggregate all-epilepsies group.

The right thalamus also showed evidence of structural compromise across all epilepsy cohorts, re-emphasizing the importance of the thalamus as a major hub in the epilepsy network. Loss of feed-forward inhibition between the thalamus and its neocortical connections may be epileptogenic, and thalamocortical abnormalities have previously been reported in IGE and MTLE. These findings support prior ‘system epilepsies’ hypotheses of pathophysiology, suggesting that a broad range of common epilepsies share vulnerability within a thalamocortical structural pathway involved in, and likely affected by, seizures. Given this study’s cross-sectional design, we cannot determine if these are causative changes, consequences of recurrent seizures, prolonged drug treatment, or a combination of factors. The epilepsies, as a broad group, may involve progressive structural change, indicating the need for large-scale longitudinal studies.

A heterogeneous subgroup of individuals without confirmed diagnoses of IGE or MTLE with hippocampal sclerosis showed similar patterns of structural alterations to those observed in the aggregate all-epilepsies cohort. The findings included enlarged ventricles, smaller right pallidum and right thalamus, and reduced thickness across the motor and frontal cortices. Hippocampal abnormalities were not observed in this subgroup, suggesting that the patterns of reduced hippocampal grey matter observed in the aggregate group were driven by the inclusion of MTLEs with hippocampal sclerosis. Unlike the IGE, MTLE, and aggregate epilepsy cohorts, this subgroup also showed bilateral enlargement of the amygdala—a phenomenon previously reported in non-lesional localization-related epilepsies and non-lesional MTLEs. Non-lesional MTLEs formed a large proportion of this ‘all-other-epilepsies’ cohort (43.3%; 445 individuals), but the subgroup included many other focal and unclassified syndromes, potentially obscuring specific biological interpretations. Future, sufficiently powered studies will stratify this cohort into finer-grained subtypes to delineate syndrome-specific effects.

Despite its international scale, our study has limitations. All results were derived from cross-sectional data: we cannot distinguish between historical acute damage and progressive abnormalities. We cannot disentangle the relative contributions of environmental and treatment-related factors, including antiepileptic medications, seizure types and frequencies, disease severity, language dominance, and other initial precipitating factors. On average, duration of epilepsy was at least 10 years; longitudinal investigations of new-onset and paediatric epilepsies will provide a more comprehensive understanding. Despite using standardized image processing protocols, quality control, and statistical techniques, some brain measures showed a wide distribution of effect sizes across research centres, which may reflect sample heterogeneity and differences in scanning protocols (Supplementary material).

We observed modest thickness differences across the majority of cortical regions; Cohen’s d effect sizes ranged from small to moderate (d = 0.2–0.5), with some very small effects (d < 0.2) noted in the right pars opercularis, bilateral pars triangularis, and bilateral transverse temporal gyri of the aggregate all-epilepsies group. Other large-scale ENIGMA studies have reported similarly modest (albeit less widespread) cortical abnormalities in psychiatric illnesses including major depression and bipolar disorder. Although epilepsy is characterized by an enduring predisposition to generate abnormal excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain (, our findings indicate that common epilepsies are associated with widespread, but relatively subtle, structural alterations of the neocortex. Replication in independent MRI cohorts, complemented by advanced imaging modalities and large-scale gene expression datasets, will help elucidate how these cortical abnormalities relate to underlying disease processes.

Overall, in the largest neuroimaging analysis of epilepsy to date, we demonstrate a pattern of robust brain structural abnormalities within and between syndromes. Specific functional interpretations cannot be inferred from grey matter differences, but lower volume and thickness measures may reflect tissue loss, supporting recent observations that the common epilepsies cannot always be considered benign. The study provides a macroscopic neuroanatomical map upon which neuropathological work, animal models, and further gene expression studies, can expand. Our consortium plans to investigate more specific neuroanatomical traits and epilepsy phenotypes, explore sophisticated shape and sulcal measures, and eventually conduct genome-wide association analysis of brain measures, to improve our understanding and treatment of the epilepsies.

Web resources

All image processing, quality assurance, and statistical analysis protocols for this study can be downloaded from the ENIGMA website, at: http://enigma.usc.edu/ongoing/enigma-epilepsy/enigma-epilepsy-protocols/.

References 79

  1. 1.

    Adams HH, Hibar DP, Chouraki V, Stein JL, Nyquist PA, Rentería ME, Novel genetic loci underlying human intracranial volume identified through genome-wide association. Nat Neurosci2016; 19: 1569–82.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.4398

  2. 2.

    Alvim MK, Coan AC, Campos BM, Yasuda CL, Oliveira MC, Morita ME, Cendes F Progression of gray matter atrophy in seizure-free patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia2016; 57; 621–9.

    Not in our library10.1111/epi.13334

  3. 3.

    Avanzini G, Manganotti P, Meletti S, Moshé SL, Panzica F, Wolf P, The system epilepsies: a pathophysiological hypothesis. Epilepsia2012; 53: 771–8.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03462.x

  4. 4.

    Bearden CE, Thompson PM Emerging global initiatives in neurogenetics: the Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics Through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium. Neuron2017; 94: 232–6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.033

  5. 5.

    Bell GS, Neligan A, Giavasi C, Keezer MR, Novy J, Peacock JL, Outcome of seizures in the general population after 25 years: a prospective follow-up, observational cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2016; 87: 843–50.

    Not in our library10.1136/jnnp-2015-312314

  6. 6.

    Bell GS, Neligan A, Sander JW An unknown quantity—the worldwide prevalence of epilepsy. Epilepsia2014; 55: 958–62.

    Not in our library10.1111/epi.12605

  7. 7.

    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc1995; 57: 289–300.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Ben-Menachem E Epilepsy in 2015: the year of collaborations for big data. Lancet Neurol2016; 15: 6–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00356-7

  9. 9.

    Berg AT, Berkovic SF, Brodie MJ, Buchhalter J, Cross JH, van Emde Boas W, Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology, 2005-2009. Epilepsia2010; 51: 676–85.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02522.x

  10. 10.

    Bernasconi N Is epilepsy a curable neurodegenerative disease?Brain2016; 139: 2336–7.

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/aww202

  11. 11.

    Bernhardt BC, Bernasconi N, Concha L, Bernasconi A Cortical thickness analysis in temporal lobe epilepsy: reproducibility and relation to outcome. Neurology2010; 74: 1776–84.

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181e0f80a

  12. 12.

    Bernhardt BC, Bernasconi N, Kim H, Bernasconi A Mapping thalamocortical network pathology in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology2012; 78: 129–36.

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0b013e31823efd0d

  13. 13.

    Bernhardt BC, Bonilha L, Gross DW Network analysis for a network disorder: the emerging role of graph theory in the study of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav2015; 50: 162–70.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.06.005

  14. 14.

    Bernhardt BC, Kim H, Bernasconi N Patterns of subregional mesiotemporal disease progression in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology2013; 81: 1840–7.

    Not in our library10.1212/01.wnl.0000436069.20513.92

  15. 15.

    Bernhardt BC, Rozen DA, Worsley KJ, Evans AC, Bernasconi N, Bernasconi A Thalamo–cortical network pathology in idiopathic generalized epilepsy: insights from MRI-based morphometric correlation analysis. Neuroimage2009a; 46: 373–81.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.055

  16. 16.

    Bernhardt BC, Worsley KJ, Kim H, Evans AC, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of atrophy in pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology2009b; 72: 1747–54.

    Not in our library10.1212/01.wnl.0000345969.57574.f5

  17. 17.

    Betting LE, Mory SB, Lopes-Cendes I, Li LM, Guerreiro MM, Guerreiro CAM, MRI reveals structural abnormalities in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Neurology2006; 67: 848–52.

    Not in our library10.1212/01.wnl.0000233886.55203.bd

  18. 18.

    Blanc F, Martinian L, Liagkouras I, Catarino C, Sisodiya SM, Thom M Investigation of widespread neocortical pathology associated with hippocampal sclerosis in epilepsy: a postmortem study. Epilepsia2011; 52: 10–21.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02773.x

  19. 19.

    Blümcke I, Spreafico R, Haaker G, Coras R, Kobow K, Bien CG, Pfäfflin M, Histopathological findings in tissue obtained from epilepsy surgery. N Engl J Med2017; 377: 1648–56.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1703784

  20. 20.

    Blümcke I, Thom M, Aronica E, Armstrong DD, Bartolomei F, Bernasconi A, International consensus classification of hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy: a task force report from the ILAE Commission on Diagnostic Methods. Epilepsia2013; 54: 1315–29.

    Not in our library10.1111/epi.12220

  21. 21.

    Boedhoe PSW, Abe Y, Ameis SH, Arnold PD, Batistuzzo MC, Benedetti F, Distinct subcortical volume alterations in pediatric and adult OCD: a worldwide meta- and mega-analysis. AJP2017; 174: 60–9.

    Not in our library10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16020201

  22. 22.

    Bonilha L, Rorden C, Halford JJ, Eckert M, Appenzeller S, Asymmetrical extra-hippocampal grey matter loss related to hippocampal atrophy in patients with medial temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2007; 78: 286–94.

    Not in our library10.1136/jnnp.2006.103994

  23. 23.

    Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci2013; 14: 365–76.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn3475

  24. 24.

    Caciagli L, Bernhardt BC, Hong S-J, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N Functional network alterations and their structural substrate in drug-resistant epilepsy. Front Neurosci2014; 8: 411.

    Not in our library10.3389/fnins.2014.00411

  25. 25.

    Caciagli L, Bernasconi A, Wiebe S, Koepp MJ, Bernasconi N, Bernhardt BC A meta-analysis on progressive atrophy in intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: time is brain?Neurology2017; 89: 506–16.

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0000000000004176

  26. 26.

    Coan AC, Campos BM, Yasuda CL, Kubota BY, Bergo FP, Guerreiro CA, Frequent seizures are associated with a network of gray matter atrophy in temporal lobe epilepsy with or without hippocampal sclerosis. PLoS One2014; 9: e85843.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0085843

  27. 27.

    Coan AC, Morita ME, de Campos BM, Yasuda C, Cendes F Amygdala enlargement in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy without hippocampal sclerosis. Front Neurol2013; 4: 1–5.

    Not in our library10.3389/fneur.2013.00166

  28. 28.

    de Campos B, Coan A, Yasuda C, Casseb R, Cendes F Large-scale brain networks are distinctly affected in right and left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Hum Brain Mapp2016; 37: 3137–52.

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.23231

  29. 29.

    Devinsky O, Friedman D, Cheng JY, Moffatt E, Kim A, Tseng ZH Underestimation of sudden deaths among patients with seizures and epilepsy. Neurology2017; 89: 886–92.

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0000000000004292

  30. 30.

    Englot DJ, Chang EF, Auguste KI Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response. J Neurosurg2011; 115: 1248–55.

    Not in our library10.3171/2011.7.jns11977

  31. 31.

    Fischl B FreeSurfer. Neuroimage2012; 62: 774–81.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021

  32. 32.

    Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia2014; 55: 475–82.

    Not in our library10.1111/epi.12550

  33. 33.

    French JA Refractory epilepsy: clinical overview. Epilepsia2007; 48: 3–7.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.00992.x

  34. 34.

    Gaitatzis A, Johnson AL, Chadwick DW, Shorvon SD, Sander JW Life expectancy in people with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Brain2004; 127: 2427–32.

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/awh267

  35. 35.

    Gotman J, Grova C, Bagshaw A, Kobayashi E, Aghakhani Y, Dubeau F Generalized epileptic discharges show thalamocortical activation and suspension of the default state of the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2005; 102: 15236–240.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0504935102

  36. 36.

    Hansen TI, Brezova V, Eikenes L, Haberg A, Vangberg TR How does the accuracy of intracranial volume measurements affect normalized brain volumes? Sample size estimates based on 966 subjects from the HUNT MRI cohort. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015; 36: 1450–6.

    Not in our library10.3174/ajnr.a4299

  37. 37.

    He X, Doucet GE, Pustina D, Sperling MR, Sharan AD, Tracy JI Presurgical thalamic “hubness” predicts surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology2017; 88: 2285–93.

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0000000000004035

  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    Hibar DP, Stein JL, Rentería ME, Arias-Vasquez A, Desrivières S, Jahanshad N, Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures. Nature2015; 520: 224–9.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14101

  40. 40.

    Hibar DP, Westlye LT, Doan NT, Jahanshad N, Cheung JW, Ching CRK, Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder: an MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA bipolar disorder working group. Mol Psychiatry2017b, in press.

    Not in our library10.1038/mp.2017.73

  41. 41.

    Hibar DP, Westlye LT, van Erp TGM, Rasmussen J, Leonardo CD, Faskowitz J, Subcortical volumetric abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry2016; 21: 1710–16.

    Not in our library10.1038/mp.2015.227

  42. 42.

    Hoogman M, Bralten J, Hibar DP, Mennes M, Zwiers MP, Schweren LSJ, Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: a cross-sectional mega-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry2017; 4: 310–19.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30049-4

  43. 43.

    International League Against Epilepsy Consortium on Complex Epilepsies. Genetic determinants of common epilepsies: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol2014; 13: 893–903.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70171-1

  44. 44.

    Jobst BC, Cascino GD Thalamus as a “hub” to predict outcome after epilepsy surgery. Neurology2017; 88: 2246–7.

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0000000000004043

  45. 45.

    Keller SS, Glenn GR, Weber B, Kreilkamp BAK, Jensen JH, Preoperative automated fibre quantification predicts postoperative seizure outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain2017; 140: 68–2.

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/aww280

  46. 46.

    Keller SS, Mackay CE, Barrick TR, Wieschmann UC, Howard MA, Roberts N Voxel-based morphometric comparison of hippocampal and extrahippocampal abnormalities in patients with left and right hippocampal atrophy. Neuroimage2002; 16: 23–31.

    Not in our library10.1006/nimg.2001.1072

  47. 47.

    Keller SS, O’Muircheartaigh J, Traynor C, Towgood K, Barker G, Richardson MP Thalamotemporal impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy: a combined MRI analysis of structure, integrity, and connectivity. Epilepsia2014; 55: 306–15.

    Not in our library10.1111/epi.12520

  48. 48.

    Keller SS, Richardson MP, Schoene-Bake J, O’Muircheartaigh J, Thalamotemporal alteration and postoperative seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol2015; 77: 760–74.

    Not in our library10.1002/ana.24376

  49. 49.

    Keller SS, Roberts N Voxel-based morphometry of temporal lobe epilepsy: an introduction and review of the literature. Epilepsia2008; 49; 741–57.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01485.x

  50. 50.
  51. 51.

    Kemmotsu N, Girard HM, Bernhardt BC, Bonilha B, Lin JJ, Tecoma ES, MRI analysis in temporal lobe epilepsy: cortical thinning and white matter disruptions are related to side of seizure onset. Epilepsia2011; 52: 2257–66.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03278.x

  52. 52.

    Labate A, Cerasa A, Aguglia U, Mumoli L, Quattrone A, Gambardella A Neocortical thinning in ‘benign’ mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia2011; 52: 712–17.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03038.x

  53. 53.

    Liu M, Bernhardt BC, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N Gray matter structural compromise is equally distributed in left and right temporal lobe epilepsy. Human Brain Mapping2016; 37: 515–24.

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.23046

  54. 54.

    Liu RSN, Lemieux L, Bell GS, Hammers A, Sisodiya SM, Bartlett PA, Progressive neocortical damage in epilepsy. Ann Neurol2003; 53: 312–24.

    Not in our library10.1002/ana.10463

  55. 55.

    Mueller SG, Laxer KD, Barakos J, Cheong I, Finlay D, Garcia P, Involvement of the thalamocortical network in TLE with and without mesiotemporal sclerosis. Epilepsia2010; 51: 1436–45.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02413.x

  56. 56.

    Nickels KC, Zaccariello MJ, Hamiwka LD, Wirrell EC Cognitive and neurodevelopmental comorbidities in paediatric epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol2016; 12: 465–76.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrneurol.2016.98

  57. 57.

    O’Muircheartaigh J, Vollmar C, Barker GJ, Kumari V, Symms MR, Focal structural changes and cognitive dysfunction in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Neurology2011; 76: 34–40.

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0b013e318203e93d

  58. 58.

    O’Muircheartaigh J, Vollmar C, Barker GJ, Kumari V, Symms MR, Abnormal thalamocortical structural and functional connectivity in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Brain2012; 135: 3635–44.

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/aws296

  59. 59.

    Overvliet GM, Besseling RMH, Jansen JFA, van der Kruijs SJM, Vles JSH, Hofman PAM, Early onset of cortical thinning in children with rolandic epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin2013; 2: 434–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.008

  60. 60.

    Pail M, Brázdil M, Mareček R, Mikl M An optimized voxel-based morphometric study of gray matter changes in patients with left-sided and right-sided mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE/HS). Epilepsia2009; 51: 511–18.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02324.x

  61. 61.

    Paz JT, Huguenard JR Microcircuits and their interactions in epilepsy: is the focus out of focus?Nat Neurosci2015; 18: 351–9.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.3950

  62. 62.

    Pitkänen A, Löscher W, Vezzani A, Becker AJ, Simonato M, Lukasiuk K, Advances in the development of biomarkers for epilepsy. Lancet Neurol2016; 15: 843–56.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00112-5

  63. 63.

    Reyes A, Thesen T, Kuzniecky R, Devinsky O, McDonald CR, Amygdala enlargement: temporal lobe epilepsy subtype or nonspecific finding?Epilepsy Res2017; 132: 34–40.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.02.019

  64. 64.

    Ronan L, Alhusaini S, Scanlon C, Doherty CP, Delanty N, Fitzsimons M Widespread cortical morphologic changes in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: evidence from structural MRI. Epilepsia2012; 53: 651–8.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03413.x

  65. 65.

    Scheffer IE, Berkovic S, Capovilla G, Connolly MB, French J, ILAE Classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia2017; 58: 512–21.

    Not in our library10.1111/epi.13709

  66. 66.
  67. 67.
  68. 68.

    Stein JL, Medland SE, Vasquez AA, Hibar DP, Senstad RE, Winkler AM, Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes. Nat Genet2012; 44: 552–61.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2250

  69. 69.

    Takaya S, Ikeda A, Takahiro M-O, Matsumoto R, Inouchi M, Temporal lobe epilepsy with amygdala enlargement: a morphological and functional study. J Neuroimaging2012; 24: 54–62.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00694.x

  70. 70.

    Téllez-Zenteno JF, Dhar R, Wiebe S Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain2005; 128: 1188–98.

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/awh449

  71. 71.

    Thom M, Eriksson S, Martinian L, Caboclo LO, McEvoy AW, Duncan JS, Temporal lobe sclerosis associated with hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy: neuropathological features. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol2009; 68: 928–38.

    Not in our library10.1097/nen.0b013e3181b05d67

  72. 72.
  73. 73.

    Vaughan D, Rayner G, Tailby C, Jackson GD MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy: a network disorder of neocortical connectivity. Neurology2016; 87: 1934–42.

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0000000000003289

  74. 74.

    van Erp TGM, Hibar DP, Rasmussen JM, Glahn DC, Pearlson GD, Andreassen OA, Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium. Mol Psychiatry2016; 21: 547–53.

    Not in our library10.1038/mp.2015.63

  75. 75.

    Viechtbauer W Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Soft2010; 36.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    Vlooswijk MC, Jansen JF, de Krom MC, Majoie HM, Hofman PA, Backes WH, Functional MRI in chronic epilepsy: associations with cognitive impairment. Lancet Neurol2010; 9: 1018–27.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70180-0

  77. 77.

    Vollmar CV, O’Muircheartaigh J, Barker GJ, Symms MR, Thompson P, Motor system hyperconnectivity in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a cognitive functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain2011; 134: 1710–19.

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/awr098

  78. 78.

    Woermann FG, Sisodiya SM, Free SL, Duncan JS Quantitative MRI in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Evidence of widespread cerebral structural changes. Brain1998; 121: 1661–7.

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/121.9.1661

  79. 79.

Cited by papers we hold 11

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.