No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.
Combenefit: an interactive platform for the analysis and visualization of drug combinations
Giovanni Y. Di Veroli, Chiara Fornari, Dennis Wang and 4 more
Bioinformatics · 2016 · CC BY
doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw230
Abstract
Motivation: Many drug combinations are routinely assessed to identify synergistic interactions in the attempt to develop novel treatment strategies. Appropriate software is required to analyze the results of these studies. Results: We present Combenefit, new free software tool that enables the visualization, analysis and quantification of drug combination effects in terms of synergy and/or antagonism. Data from combinations assays can be processed using classical Synergy models (Loewe, Bliss, HSA), as single experiments or in batch for High Throughput Screens. This user-friendly tool provides laboratory scientists with an easy and systematic way to analyze their data. The companion package provides bioinformaticians with critical implementations of routines enabling the processing of combination data. Availability and Implementation: Combenefit is provided as a Matlab package but also as standalone software for Windows (http://sourceforge.net/projects/combenefit/). Contact: Giovanni.DiVeroli@cruk.cam.ac.uk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 16, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
1 Introduction
The combination of drugs is an important strategy to treat various diseases. The goal is to increase efficacy and, through the avoidance of overlapping toxicity, improve the therapeutic index of treatment. At the discovery stage, research often focuses on the identification of synergistic target effects using in vitro systems. Large scale combination screens testing multiple pairwise combinations of drugs across different concentration ranges and cell lines are being performed with increasing frequency. Typically, the dose–response data generated during these experiments are then analyzed in terms of synergistic or antagonistic effects. Free software were developed in the past but these are limited in terms of data handling and available options, particularly given high throughput screens (HTS) requirements (http://www.combosyn.com/;; ). Two recent commercial software packages offer advanced features such as automated analyses, choice from a variety of models, quality curve-fitting, variety of graphical displays and metrics quantification (Chalice http://cwr.horizondiscovery.com; Genedata https://www.genedata.com). There is a lack of free, advanced, scalable, software for the analysis of drug combinations. As part of the growing effort in the search of effective combinations, we present here Combenefit (‘Combinations Benefit’), a new software tool that enables the visualization, analysis and quantification of drug combination effects, in terms of synergy and/or antagonism, for single combination experiments but also HTS as per commercial packages (Table 1).
2 General overview
Combenefit implements a surface approach, where in vitro experimental data is compared to mathematical models of dose–responses for non-synergistic combinations (also termed additive or independent combinations; ). The three classical models, namely the Loewe, the Bliss and the Highest Single Agent (HSA;; ) models have been incorporated. These models have been used extensively in the literature, with different fields having their preference and sometimes alternative names for these same models. It is important to use these models in a consistent way and to provide results in the context of the model used. Additionally, our own group is currently developing a new general model which, together with any other future feature, will be incorporated into Combenefit.
The approach implemented in Combenefit can be summarized as follows (Fig. 1a). The experimental dose–response surface that delineates combination effects in concentration space, is first read by the software as a matrix of % of the control value across concentrations. Single agent effects are extracted from this data and fitted with a dose response curve. Based on the two single agent dose response curves, a model-based combination dose–response surface is derived. This surface provides a ‘reference’ dose–response surface for a non-synergistic (additive/independent) combination, whose characteristics are determined by the selected model (Loewe, Bliss, etc.). The experimental combination dose response surface is then compared to the model-generated one, resulting in a synergy distribution in concentration space. This synergy distribution can be further summarized via various metrics as described below.
3 Using Combenefit
The software is available as a standalone application for Windows or as a Matlab package. The standalone application can be installed automatically and is then directly accessed through its own icon. The Matlab package needs to be saved in a dedicated folder which is then accessed via Matlab by calling the Combenefit routine contained in the package. Laboratory scientists can quickly and easily analyze their data using either version. Bioinformaticians can use the code provided in the Matlab package to facilitate their own projects involving drugs combinations.
3.1 Typical analysis
A typical analysis is performed as follows. Upon completion of experiments, the results of a specific combination (including replicates if available) are saved in.xls files (the data is ordered with the first drug in columns and the second in rows; a template is provided). Once Combenefit is launched, the project folder containing all experimental.xls files is selected (Fig. 1b). Then, one or more reference models can be selected. Other options and graphical outputs can be chosen as per requirements/preferences. The graphical outputs consist of: (i) the single agent dose response data and its fitting, (ii) the combination dose response (Four different displays), (iii) the model-generated reference combination dose response, i.e. the prediction of effect if the drugs are not synergistic (Three different displays) and (iv) the resulting synergy distribution (Three different displays). Additionally, a fourth graphic mapping the synergy distribution onto the dose–response surface can also be displayed to facilitate interpretation. All figures, as well as corresponding data, fitting parameters and synergy metrics (see below) can be saved in the project folder. Figures are saved as high quality.png or.pdf files which can be directly used in publications. A user’s guide with step-by-step guidance for installing and running the software is available online.
3.2 Metrics and batch analysis
The analyses described above result in a synergy distribution for the combination being processed. To facilitate comparison across experiments, or for HTS applications, it is useful to summarize the resulting synergy and/or antagonism distribution using one or more metrics. Combenefit provides a set of metrics (or scores) which captures information about the synergy distribution. These include metrics such as the maximum synergy, the integrated and the weighted integrated synergy and concentration value at which synergy is most dense (for a full list of metrics and their formulation, please see the Supplementary Material).
During HTS, large volumes of combinations and cell lines are investigated using automated technology. Combenefit can be used to analyze the large amount of data derived with these screens. Using Combenefit, the user selects the folder containing all experiments (each in an individual sub-folder) and then selects the ‘Batch Analysis’ option. Upon running the analysis, Combenefit will batch process in a sequential way all the folders. The results of the analysis are summarized in a table containing all the experiments in rows and the metrics in columns. Typically, the highest hits are then visually inspected using Combenefit’s graphical outputs to improve understanding of the data and prioritize drug combinations. Combenefit has been recently used to generate the AstraZeneca dataset (∼11 500 combinations) provided for the current AstraZeneca-Sanger Drug Combination Prediction DREAM challenge (http://dreamchallenges.org/).
In summary, we have described the overall implementation and functioning of Combenefit, new software which offers advanced graphical capabilities and allows for model-based quantification of drug combinations in single and high-throughput settings. We hope that this new tool will continue to improve and will help many scientists in a variety of fields involving combination data analyses.
References 17
- 1.
Bliss C.I. (1939 ) The toxicity of poisons applied jointly. Ann. Appl. Biol., 26, 585–615
Not in our library
- 2.
Chou T.C. (2010 ) Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou–Talalay method. Cancer Res., 70, 440–446.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-1947
- 3.
Dressler V (1999 ) CombiTool–a new computer program for analyzing combination experiments with biologically active agents. Comput. Biomed. Res., 32, 145–160.
Not in our library10.1006/cbmr.1999.1509
- 4.
Greco W.R. Bravo G.,P.J.C., (1995 ) The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective. Pharmacol. Rev., 47, 331–385.
Not in our library
- 5.
He S (2015 ) Repurposing of the antihistamine chlorcyclizine and related compounds for treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. Sci. Transl. Med., 7, 1–11.
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3010286
- 6.
Held M. a (2013 ) Genotype-selective combination therapies for melanoma identified by high-throughput drug screening. Cancer Discov., 3, 52–67.
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0408
- 7.
Lehár J (2009 ) Synergistic drug combinations tend to improve therapeutically relevant selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol., 27, 659–666.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1549
- 8.
Loewe S. (1953 ) The problem of synergism and antagonism of combined drugs. ArzneimiettelForschung, 3, 286–290.
Not in our library
- 9.
Loewe S. Muchnick H. (1926 ) Effect of combinations: mathematical basis of problem. Arch. Exp. Pathol. Pharmacol., 114, 313–326.
Not in our library
- 10.
Long G.V (2014 ) Increased MAPK reactivation in early resistance to dabrafenib/trametinib combination therapy of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Nat. Commun., 5, 5694.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms6694
- 11.
Mathews Griner L.A (2014 ) High-throughput combinatorial screening identifies drugs that cooperate with ibrutinib to kill activated B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 2349–2354.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1311846111
- 12.
Odds F.C. (2003 ) Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 52, 1.
Not in our library10.1093/jac/dkg301
- 13.
Prichard M.N. Shipman C. (1990 ) A three-dimensional model to analyze drug-drug interactions. Antiviral Res., 14, 181–205.
Not in our library10.1016/0166-3542(90)90001-n
- 14.
Roemer T. Boone C. (2013 ) Systems-level antimicrobial drug and drug synergy discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol., 9, 222–231.
Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1205
- 15.
Sun X (2013 ) High-throughput methods for combinatorial drug discovery. Sci. Trans. Med., 5, 205rv1.
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3006667
- 16.
Tan X (2012 ) Systematic identification of synergistic drug pairs targeting HIV. Nat. Biotechnol., 30, 1125–1130.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2391
- 17.
Webb J.L. (1963 ) Effect of more than one inhibitor. Enzyme Metab. Inhib, 1, 66–79.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 13
- A human breast cancer-derived xenograft and organoid platform for drug discovery and precision oncology · 2022No notice
- A survey of optimal strategy for signature-based drug repositioning and an application to liver cancer · 2022No notice
- SynergyFinder Plus: Toward Better Interpretation and Annotation of Drug Combination Screening Datasets · 2022No notice
- Co-targeting of BAX and BCL-XL proteins broadly overcomes resistance to apoptosis in cancer · 2022No notice
- SynergyFinder 3.0: an interactive analysis and consensus interpretation of multi-drug synergies across multiple samples · 2022No notice
- DNA-PK Inhibitor, M3814, as a New Combination Partner of Mylotarg in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia · 2020Not checked
- Myosin II Reactivation and Cytoskeletal Remodeling as a Hallmark and a Vulnerability in Melanoma Therapy Resistance · 2020No notice
- MicroRNA-Mediated Suppression of the TGF-β Pathway Confers Transmissible and Reversible CDK4/6 Inhibitor Resistance · 2019Not checked
- Predicting Synergism of Cancer Drug Combinations Using NCI-ALMANAC Data · 2019No notice
- BCL-XL and MCL-1 are the key BCL-2 family proteins in melanoma cell survival · 2019No notice
- Community assessment to advance computational prediction of cancer drug combinations in a pharmacogenomic screen · 2019No notice
- Drug combination sensitivity scoring facilitates the discovery of synergistic and efficacious drug combinations in cancer · 2019No notice
- DeepSynergy: predicting anti-cancer drug synergy with Deep Learning · 2017No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.