No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 15, 2026.
GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server
Bo Hu, Jinpu Jin, An-Yuan Guo and 3 more (opens in a new tab)
Bioinformatics · 2014 · CC BY
doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817 (opens in a new tab)
Abstract
Summary: Visualizing genes’ structure and annotated features helps biologists to investigate their function and evolution intuitively. The Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) has been widely used by more than 60 000 users since its first publication in 2007. Here, we reported the upgraded GSDS 2.0 with a newly designed interface, supports for more types of annotation features and formats, as well as an integrated visual editor for editing the generated figure. Moreover, a user-specified phylogenetic tree can be added to facilitate further evolutionary analysis. The full source code is also available for downloading. Availability and implementation: Web server and source code are freely available at http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn. Contact: gaog@mail.cbi.pku.edu.cn or gsds@mail.cbi.pku.edu.cn Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 16, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
1 Introduction
The visualization of gene features such as composition and position of exons and introns for genes offers visual presentation for biologists to integrate annotation, and also helps them to produce high-quality figures for publication. Thus, several web servers/software including FancyGene, GECA, FeatureStack, GSDraw, GPViz and GenePainter have been developed recently. Designing to generate high-quality figures suitable for publication, we developed an online Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS), which supported three input formats including sequences, accession number of GenBank and exon positions. With more than 1 million hits annually, GSDS has been widely used by world-wide scientists in the functional and evolutionary study of gene families.
According to the feedbacks from GSDS users, we developed the upgraded GSDS 2.0. Compared with the previous version, GSDS 2.0 supports two more widely used annotation formats, providing more comprehensive support for annotation files. To aid biologists generating suitable figures for publication, GSDS 2.0 offers a powerful interactive interface. Users can customize the size, shape and color of annotation features after their initial render and even fine-tune each element through an integrated visual editor. To facilitate evolutionary analysis, a user-specified phylogenetic tree can be added to the figure. Finally, the generated figure can be exported as either vector graphic (in SVG and PDF format), or raster graphic (in PNG format).
2 Usage and implementation
Based on feedbacks from users of GSDS 1.0, we upgraded GSDS to version 2.0 with a newly designed interface and several novel functions (Fig. 1): More types of annotation features and formats are supported. In addition to GenBank ID and FASTA sequences, GSDS 2.0 also supports commonly used formats including BED, GTF and GFF3. Moreover, extra features such as conserved elements and binding sites can also be uploaded and displayed along with the main features (‘Region 2’ in Fig. 1B).The generated figures can be further modified by users. With the purpose to generate suitable, high-quality figures for publication, GSDS 2.0 provides types of functionality on their further modification (Fig. 1B). By setting the parameters on the result page (‘Region 3’ in Fig. 1B), users can turn on/off the display of specified features and adjust their size, shape and color. Intron lengths can also be rescaled to display large introns properly (‘Region 4’ in Fig. 1B). Moreover, the generated figure can be sent to a built-in online SVG editor for further modification interactively after clicking the ‘Edit figure interactively’ button (‘Region 5’ in Fig. 1B).According to the published works using original GSDS 1.0, a large proportion of analyzes have been targeted on the evolutionary study of gene structures. Thus, we implemented a dedicated panel for users to specify a phylogenetic tree for display side-by-side with the main canvas (‘Region 1’ in Fig. 1B).
More types of annotation features and formats are supported. In addition to GenBank ID and FASTA sequences, GSDS 2.0 also supports commonly used formats including BED, GTF and GFF3. Moreover, extra features such as conserved elements and binding sites can also be uploaded and displayed along with the main features (‘Region 2’ in Fig. 1B).
The generated figures can be further modified by users. With the purpose to generate suitable, high-quality figures for publication, GSDS 2.0 provides types of functionality on their further modification (Fig. 1B). By setting the parameters on the result page (‘Region 3’ in Fig. 1B), users can turn on/off the display of specified features and adjust their size, shape and color. Intron lengths can also be rescaled to display large introns properly (‘Region 4’ in Fig. 1B). Moreover, the generated figure can be sent to a built-in online SVG editor for further modification interactively after clicking the ‘Edit figure interactively’ button (‘Region 5’ in Fig. 1B).
According to the published works using original GSDS 1.0, a large proportion of analyzes have been targeted on the evolutionary study of gene structures. Thus, we implemented a dedicated panel for users to specify a phylogenetic tree for display side-by-side with the main canvas (‘Region 1’ in Fig. 1B).
Compared with similar tools, GSDS 2.0 shows superiors in both the supports for input/output formats, usability and availability (Supplementary Table S1).
3 Further directions
We have updated our GSDS to version 2.0, which supports more types of features and feature describing formats, as well as further modification on the generated figures. By analyzing the usage of GSDS and feedbacks from users, we will continue our efforts to update GSDS to better serve this community.
References 13
- 1.
Benson D.A.. (2013 ) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D36–42.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks1195 (opens in a new tab)
- 2.
Fawal N.. (2012 ) GECA: a fast tool for gene evolution and conservation analysis in eukaryotic protein families. Bioinformatics, 28, 1398–1399.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts153 (opens in a new tab)
- 3.
Frech C. (2012 ) FeatureStack: perl module for comparative visualization of gene features. Bioinformatics, 28, 3137–3138.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts572 (opens in a new tab)
- 4.
Guo A.Y.. (2007 ) GSDS: a gene structure display server. Yi Chuan, 29, 1023–1026.
Not in our library
- 5.
Hammesfahr B.. (2013 ) GenePainter: a fast tool for aligning gene structures of eukaryotic protein families, visualizing the alignments and mapping gene structures onto protein structures. BMC Bioinformatics, 14, 77.
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2105-14-77 (opens in a new tab)
- 6.
- 7.
Rambaldi D. Ciccarelli F.D. (2009 ) FancyGene: dynamic visualization of gene structures and protein domain architectures on genomic loci. Bioinformatics, 25, 2281–2282.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp381 (opens in a new tab)
- 8.
Snajder R. (2013 ) GPViz: dynamic visualization of genomic regions and variants affecting protein domains. Bioinformatics, 29, 2195–2196.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btt354 (opens in a new tab)
- 9.
Wang S.. (2010 ) Auxin-related gene families in abiotic stress response in Sorghum bicolor. Funct. Integr. Genomics, 10, 533–546.
Not in our library10.1007/s10142-010-0174-3 (opens in a new tab)
- 10.
Wang Y. (2013 ) PIECE: a database for plant gene structure comparison and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D1159–1166.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks1109 (opens in a new tab)
- 11.
Ye H.. (2009 ) Identification and expression profiling analysis of TIFY family genes involved in stress and phytohormone responses in rice. Plant Mol. Biol., 71, 291–305.
Not in our library10.1007/s11103-009-9524-8 (opens in a new tab)
- 12.
- 13.
Yu X.H. (2009 ) BAHD superfamily of acyl-CoA dependent acyltransferases in Populus and Arabidopsis: bioinformatics and gene expression. Plant Mol. Biol., 70, 421–442.
Not in our library10.1007/s11103-009-9482-1 (opens in a new tab)
Cited by papers we hold 31
- Identification and expression analysis of LRR-RLK genes reveal their roles in plant development and stress responses in Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) · 2025Not checked
- Identification and expression analysis of the BnE2F/DP gene family in Brassica napus · 2025Not checked
- Genome-wide identification and characterization of parthenocarpic fruit set-related gene homologs in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) · 2023Not checked
- Genome-wide identification of the Liriodendron chinense WRKY gene family and its diverse roles in response to multiple abiotic stress · 2022Not checked
- Evolution and Stress Responses of CLO Genes and Potential Function of the GhCLO06 Gene in Salt Resistance of Cotton · 2022Not checked
- Pearl Millet Aquaporin Gene PgPIP2;6 Improves Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco · 2022Not checked
- Two independent allohexaploidizations and genomic fractionation in Solanales · 2022Not checked
- Genome-Wide Identification and Comparative Analysis of WOX Genes in Four Euphorbiaceae Species and Their Expression Patterns in Jatropha curcas · 2022Not checked
- Genome-wide analysis reveals the spatiotemporal expression patterns of SOS3 genes in the maize B73 genome in response to salt stress · 2022Not checked
- Genome-wide analysis and expression profile of the bZIP gene family in poplar · 2021Not checked
- Genome-wide identification of the 14–3-3 gene family and its participation in floral transition by interacting with TFL1/FT in apple · 2021Not checked
- Genome-wide and comparative phylogenetic analysis of senescence-associated NAC transcription factors in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) · 2021Not checked
- Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of MATE family genes in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) · 2021Not checked
- Genome-wide characterization of 2-oxoglutarate and Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenase family genes in tomato during growth cycle and their roles in metabolism · 2021Not checked
- Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase GhCDPK28 Was Dentified and Involved in Verticillium Wilt Resistance in Cotton · 2021Not checked
- Genome-wide identification and analysis of high-affinity nitrate transporter 2 (NRT2) family genes in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and their responses to various stresses · 2020Not checked
- Systematic Analysis of MYB Family Genes in Potato and Their Multiple Roles in Development and Stress Responses · 2019Not checked
- Systematic analysis of dark and camouflaged genes reveals disease-relevant genes hiding in plain sight · 2019No notice
- Molecular characterization and differential expression suggested diverse functions of P-type II Ca2+ATPases in Triticum aestivum L · 2018Not checked
- Identification and characterization of histone modification gene family reveal their critical responses to flower induction in apple · 2018Not checked
and 11 more
Questions about this paper
We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.