No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.
SNiPA : an interactive, genetic variant-centered annotation browser
Matthias Arnold, Johannes Raffler, Arne Pfeufer and 2 more
Bioinformatics · 2014 · CC BY
doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu779
Abstract
Motivation: Linking genes and functional information to genetic variants identified by association studies remains difficult. Resources containing extensive genomic annotations are available but often not fully utilized due to heterogeneous data formats. To enhance their accessibility, we integrated many annotation datasets into a user-friendly webserver. Availability and implementation: http://www.snipa.org/ Contact: g.kastenmueller@helmholtz-muenchen.de Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
1 Introduction
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) are performed routinely to identify genetic variants and novel genes implicated in both common and rare human diseases. A key step in translating results from such studies into a better understanding of molecular disease mechanisms and, ultimately, into clinical applications, is the prioritization of potentially functional variants that may be active in vivo. To this end, comprehensive collection and evaluation of existing functional annotation from genetic, informatics and experimental resources is essential. This comprises the integration of data and knowledge across multiple levels including the variant, the gene and the chromatin level.
Several large resources (Ensembl, UCSC, NCBI, etc.) aim at providing genome-wide genome-level annotation tracks from an extensive set of resources. However, retrieving statistical and functional annotation relevant at the single nucleotide level remains difficult. For instance, common genome browsers often display single nucleotide variants (SNVs) as thin bars that trail away in the wealth of other annotation tracks and are even less prepared to display statistics such as linkage disequilibrium (LD) relationships between variants. This limits visual distinction of relevant variants from those without relevant annotations and leaves the complex task of aggregating position-based data to the researcher. Variant-centered resources, on the other hand, typically concentrate on specific types of data such as amino acid changes, expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), trait associations or regulatory effect predictions. Moreover, these annotations are often presented in resource-specific data structures.
For individual inspection of single variants, both resource types are extremely valuable. However, for simultaneous processing of larger variant sets, collection and examination of annotations from different data sources quickly becomes cumbersome. This presents a major bottleneck in genome-wide scans of genetic influences on human traits since the collection of such evidences is the key to understanding the effects of phenotype-linked genetic variants.
Here we propose SNiPA, a web service offering variant-centered genome browsing and interactive visualization tools tailored for easy inspection of many variants in their locus context (Fig. 1).
2 Data and features
SNiPA includes a wide range of genome-level datasets contained in the Ensembl database as an established backbone of annotations for the human genome. We combine this backbone with numerous variant-specific annotations taken from published datasets. Thus, SNiPA covers information ranging from regulatory elements, over gene annotations to variant annotations and associations (Table 1; Supplementary Text S1). SNiPA contains annotations for all bi-allelic variants in phase 3 version 5 of the 1000 genomes project and provides pre-calculated LD-data for r2 ≥ 0.1 for all super populations (African, American, South and East Asian, European). We use the Ensembl VEP tool for primary effect prediction of SNVs. Additional position-based data is included in the VEP prediction as custom annotation files. For other annotations, we wrote a Perl module to extend the output provided by VEP (Table 1; Supplementary Text S1).
SNiPA provides user-friendly starting points for annotating individual SNVs as well as sets of SNVs, LD blocks or genetic regions of interest. We have implemented several entry points to access the data: (i) a variant-centered implementation of a genome browser (‘Variant Browser’); (ii) ‘Association Maps’ for browsing through GWAS results; (iii) an interface for batch retrieval of variant annotations via ID-list, gene ID or genomic coordinates (‘Variant Annotation’); (iv) a combined listing of annotations across a set of variants within LD blocks or chromosomal regions (‘Block Annotation’); (v) ‘Regional Association Plot’ and ‘Linkage Disequilibrium Plot’ that combine publication-ready plotting of association results and LD values, respectively, with the interactive interface of the ‘Variant Browser’; (vi) ‘Proxy Search’ and ‘Pairwise LD’ that allow querying precalculated LD values augmented with variant annotations. SNiPA enables the user to download condensed annotation data in tabular format for further off-line processing. Detailed descriptions of SNiPA modules are available in the online documentation and Supplementary Text S1.
The complex information contained in SNiPA is organized in a clear, comprehensive and informative structure extending effect categories contained in the Sequence Ontology (Supplementary Text S1). For instance, variant annotations are presented as ‘SNiPAcards’ grouping information into semantic sections. All annotations are linked to their primary sources and to the Ensembl genome browser.
3 Conclusion
Mechanistic characterization of variants identified by genetic studies is the key to understanding molecular disease mechanisms. SNiPA combines a comprehensive set of genomic annotations with a genetic variant-based genome browser to simplify the task of variant annotation. SNiPA as well as all underlying data is freely available to the scientific community (commercial use may be limited by third-party constraints) and will be automatically updated following the Ensembl releases.
Funding
This work was supported by the Helmholtz Portfolio theme ‘Metabolic Dysfunction and common disease’ and by the research project Greifswald Approach to Individualized Medicine (GANI_MED) (BMBF: 03IS2061A). K.S. is supported by Biomedical Research Program funds at Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, a program funded by the Qatar Foundation.
Conflict of Interest: none declared.
References 13
- 1.
1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. (2012 ) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature, 491, 56–65.
Not in our library10.1038/nature11632
- 2.
Adzhubei I.A. (2010 ) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods, 7, 248–249.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth0410-248
- 3.
- 4.
Boyle A.P. (2012 ) Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res., 22, 1790–1797.
Not in our library10.1101/gr.137323.112
- 5.
Diabetes Genetics Initiative of Broad Institute of Harvard, M.I.T., Lund University, and Novartis Institutes of BioMedical Research et al. (2007 ) Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science, 316, 1331–1336.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1142358
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
GTEx Consortium (2013 ) The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet., 45, 580–585.
Not in our library10.1038/ng.2653
- 9.
Hindorff L.A. (2009 ) Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 9362–9367.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0903103106
- 10.
Kumar P. (2009 ) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc., 4, 1073–1081.
Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2009.86
- 11.
MacArthur D.G. (2014 ) Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease, Nature, 508, 469–476.
Not in our library10.1038/nature13127
- 12.
McLaren W. (2010 ) Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP Effect Predictor. Bioinformatics, 26, 2069–2070.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq330
- 13.
Xia K. (2012 ) seeQTL: a searchable database for human eQTLs. Bioinformatics, 28, 451–452.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btr678
Cited by papers we hold 13
- Precise modulation of transcription factor levels identifies features underlying dosage sensitivity · 2023No notice
- Genotyping and population characteristics of the China Kadoorie Biobank · 2023No notice
- rs641738C>T near MBOAT7 is associated with liver fat, ALT and fibrosis in NAFLD: A meta-analysis · 2021No notice
- Leukocyte telomere length and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a Mendelian randomization study · 2021Not checked
- Depression and prostate cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study · 2020No notice
- Pathologic gene network rewiring implicates PPP1R3A as a central regulator in pressure overload heart failure · 2019Not checked
- Assessing the causal association of glycine with risk of cardio-metabolic diseases · 2019No notice
- ProGeM: a framework for the prioritization of candidate causal genes at molecular quantitative trait loci · 2018No notice
- Genome-wide analyses identify a role for SLC17A4 and AADAT in thyroid hormone regulation · 2018No notice
- Whole exome sequencing in thrombophilic pedigrees to identify genetic risk factors for venous thromboembolism. · 2017Not checked
- Connecting genetic risk to disease end points through the human blood plasma proteome · 2017Corrected
- A genome-wide association meta-analysis on lipoprotein (a) concentrations adjusted for apolipoprotein (a) isoforms · 2017No notice
- PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype–phenotype associations · 2016No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.