Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Data exploration, quality control and testing in single-cell qPCR-based gene expression experiments

Andrew McDavid, Greg Finak, Pratip K. Chattopadyay and 5 more (opens in a new tab)

Bioinformatics · 2012 · CC BY

doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts714 (opens in a new tab)

Abstract

Motivation: Cell populations are never truly homogeneous; individual cells exist in biochemical states that define functional differences between them. New technology based on microfluidic arrays combined with multiplexed quantitative polymerase chain reactions now enables high-throughput single-cell gene expression measurement, allowing assessment of cellular heterogeneity. However, few analytic tools have been developed specifically for the statistical and analytical challenges of single-cell quantitative polymerase chain reactions data. Results: We present a statistical framework for the exploration, quality control and analysis of single-cell gene expression data from microfluidic arrays. We assess accuracy and within-sample heterogeneity of single-cell expression and develop quality control criteria to filter unreliable cell measurements. We propose a statistical model accounting for the fact that genes at the single-cell level can be on (and a continuous expression measure is recorded) or dichotomously off (and the recorded expression is zero). Based on this model, we derive a combined likelihood ratio test for differential expression that incorporates both the discrete and continuous components. Using an experiment that examines treatment-specific changes in expression, we show that this combined test is more powerful than either the continuous or dichotomous component in isolation, or a t-test on the zero-inflated data. Although developed for measurements from a specific platform (Fluidigm), these tools are generalizable to other multi-parametric measures over large numbers of events. Availability: All results presented here were obtained using the SingleCellAssay R package available on GitHub (http://github.com/RGLab/SingleCellAssay). Contact: rgottard@fhcrc.org Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central (opens in a new tab)

References 19

  1. 1.

    Bengtsson M, et al. Gene expression profiling in single cells from the pancreatic islets of Langerhans reveals lognormal distribution of mRNA levels. Genome Res. 2005;15:1388-1392.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.3820805 (opens in a new tab)

  2. 2.

    Dalerba P, et al. Single-cell dissection of transcriptional heterogeneity in human colon tumors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:1120-1127.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2038 (opens in a new tab)

  3. 3.

    Flatz L, et al. Single-cell gene-expression profiling reveals qualitatively distinct CD8 T cells elicited by different gene-based vaccines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:5724-5729.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1013084108 (opens in a new tab)

  4. 4.

    Ge Y, et al. Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis. TEST. 2003;12:1-77.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Glotzbach JP, et al. An information theoretic, microfluidic-based single cell analysis permits identification of subpopulations among putatively homogeneous stem cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21211.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0021211 (opens in a new tab)

  6. 6.

    Gottardo R, et al. Bayesian robust inference for differential gene expression in microarrays with multiple samples. Biometrics. 2006;62:10-18.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00397.x (opens in a new tab)

  7. 7.

    Higuchi R, et al. Simultaneous amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences. Biotechnology. 1992;10:413-417.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt0492-413 (opens in a new tab)

  8. 8.

    Kalisky T, Quake SR. Single-cell genomics. Nat. Meth. 2011;8:311-314.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth0411-311 (opens in a new tab)

  9. 9.
    Statistical significance of quantitative PCR · 2007
    No notice
  10. 10.

    Kaufmann BB, van Oudenaarden A. Stochastic gene expression: from single molecules to the proteome. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007;17:107-112.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2007.02.007 (opens in a new tab)

  11. 11.

    Levsky JM, et al. Single-cell gene expression profiling. Science. 2002;297:836-840.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1072241 (opens in a new tab)

  12. 12.

    Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255-268.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.
    Single Cell Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells: Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Diversity from Breast Cancer Cell Lines · 2012
    No notice
  14. 14.

    Ramskold D, et al. Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat. Biotech. 2012;30:777-782.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2282 (opens in a new tab)

  15. 15.

    Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protocols. 2008;3:1101-1108.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2008.73 (opens in a new tab)

  16. 16.

    Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004;3.

    Not in our library10.2202/1544-6115.1027 (opens in a new tab)

  17. 17.

    Vandesompele J, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 (opens in a new tab)

  18. 18.

    Varadarajan N, et al. A high-throughput single-cell analysis of human CD8 T cell functions reveals discordance for cytokine secretion and cytolysis. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:4322-4331.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci58653 (opens in a new tab)

  19. 19.

    Wilks SS. The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat. 1938;9:60-62.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 22

and 2 more

Questions about this paper

We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.