Characterization of Key Sexually Dimorphic Regulators in Pain Processing
Shahrzad Ghazisaeidi, Arun Ramani, Parisa Shooshtari and 10 more
Canadian Journal of Pain · 2019
doi:10.1080/24740527.2019.1588628 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Introduction/Aim: Chronic pain affects 1 in 5 Canadians and costs over $43B annually, yet effective and safe treatment options remain elusive. Recent discoveries have brought to the forefront sex differences in mechanisms of pain as a potential explanation why novel pre-clinical therapeutics have not translated into successfully in clinical trials. Methods: To begin understanding how males and females differ in pain processing, we analyzed gene expression, using RNA sequencing, and DNA methylation, using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), in rodent models of neuropathic pain. Results: Across both sexes, our data reveals peripheral nerve injury (PNI) caused upregulation of 61 genes involved in innate immune responses in spinal cord. In females specifically, we observed PNI-induced downregulation of 5 genes involved in neuronal function and upregulation of two classes of Cathepsins. (C and E). On the other hand, in males, we observed upregulation of 14 genes including those involved in metabolism of purines and glutathione. Additionally we found that PNI leads to methylome remodeling in a sexually dimorphic manner: 125 promoters in rat spinal cord that were differentially methylated in injured males versus females. Discussion/Conclusions: Our data shows robust sex specific DNA methylation and transcriptome signature after PNI. Additionally, our findings leads to the hypothesis that remapping of DNA methylation, with subsequent alterations in the transcriptome, are critically involved in the development of neuropathic pain. We anticipate that future research directed at understanding these differences may lead to effective drug development to combat chronic pain.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.