Metadiscourse in Chinese and American graduate dissertation introductions
Muhammad afzaal, Muhammad Ilyas Chishti, Chao Liu and 1 more
Cogent Arts & Humanities · 2021
doi:10.1080/23311983.2021.1970879 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The current study aims to look at differences in the use of metadiscourse in the introductory sections of English and Chinese university students. The corpus of the study comprises 20 “introductions” of university students’ MA theses. This study hinges on Hyland’s model of Metadiscourse (interactive and interactional resources) for its methodological framework and aims at analyzing academic writing of native academic and non-native writers. The findings revealed a statistically significant difference in the use of metadiscourse in theses written by Chinese native speakers (CNS) and English native speakers (NS) university students. The study suggests that metadiscourse needs to become a fundamental component for effective reading and writing instruction for students.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.