Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Validation of the Chinese version of the physical activity stages of change questionnaire

Kahar Abula, Jürgen Beckmann, Kai Chen and 1 more

Cogent Psychology · 2016

doi:10.1080/23311908.2016.1228509 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Background/Objective: Sharp decline in physical activity has been observed among Chinese youth in recent decades. The transtheoretical model of behavior change (TTM) provides a useful framework for developing effective intervention programs. Yet the application of the TTM in China has been limited due to the lack of a valid TTM-based questionnaire to examine different stages of physical activity behavior. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to translate the Physical Activity Stages of Change Questionnaire (PASCQ), which is a well-validated scale based on the TTM, into Chinese and to test the psychometric properties of this Chinese version. Methods: The PASCQ was translated from English into Chinese and its internal consistency, one-week test–retest reliability and concurrent validity were tested in a sample of Chinese university students. Results: Both the internal consistency and the test–retest reliability satisfied psychometric standards. The Chinese version of the PASCQ also successfully discriminated between individuals with different levels of physical activity, which indicated a good concurrent validity. In particular, participants in the action and maintenance stages reported significantly higher energy expenditure than participants in the precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages. Conclusions: The results indicate good reliability and concurrent validity of the Chinese version of the PASCQ. The questionnaire may be profitably used to identify individuals at different stages of physical activity behavior, which may help in physical activity promotion programs among Chinese college students.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.