Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Algorithm portfolio based scheme for dynamic optimization problems

Jenny Fajardo Calderín, Antonio D. Masegosa, David A. Pelta

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · 2015

doi:10.1080/18756891.2015.1046327 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Since their first appearance in 1997 in the prestigious journal Science, algorithm portfolios have become a popular approach to solve static problems.Nevertheless and despite that success, they have not received much attention in Dynamic Optimization Problems (DOPs).In this work, we aim at showing these methods as a powerful tool to solve combinatorial DOPs.To this end, we propose a new algorithm portfolio for this type of problems that incorporates a learning scheme to select, among the metaheuristics that compose it, the most appropriate solver or solvers for each problem, configuration and search stage.This method was tested over 5 binary-coded problems (dynamic variants of OneMax, Plateau, RoyalRoad, Deceptive and Knapsack) and compared versus two reference algorithms for these problems (Adaptive Hill Climbing Memetic Algorithm and Self Organized Random Immigrants Genetic Algorithm).The results showed the importance of a good design of the learning scheme, the superiority of the algorithm portfolio against the isolated version of the metaheuristics that integrate it, and the competitiveness of its performance versus the reference algorithms.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

References51

    51 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.