Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Etiological analysis of graft dysfunction following living kidney transplantation: a report of 366 biopsies

Jin Zhang, Jiang Qiu, Guo-Dong Chen and 4 more

Renal Failure · 2018

doi:10.1080/0886022x.2018.1455592 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical features of graft dysfunction following living kidney transplantation and to assess its causes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a series of 366 living kidney transplantation indication biopsies with a clear etiology and diagnosis from July 2003 to June 2016 at our center. The classifications and diagnoses were performed based on clinical and pathological characteristics. All biopsies were evaluated according to the Banff 2007 schema. Results: Acute rejection (AR) occurred in 85 cases (22.0%), chronic rejection (CR) in 62 cases (16.1%), borderline rejection (BR) in 12 cases (3.1%), calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity damage in 41 cases (10.6%), BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in 43 cases (11.1%), de novo or recurrent renal diseases in 134 cases (34.7%), and other causes in nine cases (2.3%); additionally, 20 cases had two simultaneous causes. The 80 cases with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) had the highest incidence (59.7%) of de novo or recurrent renal diseases. After a mean ± SD follow up of 3.7 ± 2.3 years, the 5-year graft cumulative survival rates of AR, CR, CNI toxicity, BKVAN, and de novo or recurrent renal diseases were 60.1%, 31.2%, 66.6%, 66.9%, and 67.1%, respectively. Conclusions: A biopsy is helpful for the diagnosis of graft dysfunction. De novo or recurrent renal disease, represented by IgAN, is a major cause of graft dysfunction following living kidney transplantation.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

References30

    30 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.