Endobronchial high-intensity ultrasound for thermal therapy of pulmonary malignancies: simulations with patient-specific lung models

Objective: This study investigates the feasibility of endobronchial ultrasound applicators for thermal ablation of lung tumors using acoustic and biothermal simulations. Methods: Endobronchial ultrasound applicators with planar (10 mm width) or tubular transducers (6 mm outer diameter (OD)) encapsulated by expandable coupling balloons (10 mm OD) are considered for treating tumors from within major airways; smaller catheter-based applicators with tubular transducers (1.7–4 mm OD) and coupling balloons (2.5–5 mm OD) are considered within deep lung airways. Parametric studies were applied to evaluate transducer configurations, tumor size and location, effects of acoustic reflection and absorption at tumor-lung parenchyma interfaces, and the utility of lung flooding for enhancing accessibility. Patient-specific anatomical lung models, with various geometries and locations of tumors, were developed for further evaluation of device performance and treatment strategies. Temperature and thermal dose distributions were calculated and reported. Results: Large endobronchial applicators with planar or tubular transducers (3–7 MHz, 5 min) can thermally ablate tumors attached to major bronchi at up to 3 cm depth, where reflection and attenuation of normal lung localize tumor heating; with lung flooding, endobronchial applicators can ablate ∼2 cm diameter tumors with up to ∼2 cm separation from the bronchial wall, without significant heating of intervening tissue. Smaller catheter-based tubular applicators can ablate tumors up to 2–3 cm in diameter from deep lung airways (5–9 MHz, 5 min). Conclusion: Simulations demonstrate the feasibility of endobronchial ultrasound applicators to deliver thermal coagulation of 2–3 cm diameter tumors adjacent to or accessible from major and deep lung airways.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

81 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.