No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.
Global and country-level estimates of human population at high altitude
Joshua C. Tremblay, Philip N. Ainslie
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021 · CC BY
Abstract
Estimates of the global population of humans living at high altitude vary widely, and such data at the country level are unavailable. Herein, we use a geographic information system (GIS)-based approach to quantify human population at 500-m elevation intervals for each country. Based on georeferenced data for population (LandScan Global 2019) and elevation (Global Multiresolution Terrain Elevation Data), 500.3 million humans live at ≥1,500 m, 81.6 million at ≥2,500 m, and 14.4 million at ≥3,500 m. Ethiopia has the largest absolute population at ≥1,500 m and ≥2,500 m, while China has the greatest at ≥3,500 m. Lesotho has the greatest percentage of its population above 1,500 m, while Bolivia has the greatest at ≥2,500 m and ≥3,500 m. High altitude presents a myriad of environmental stresses that provoke physiological responses and adaptation, and consequently impact disease prevalence and severity. While the majority of high-altitude physiology research is based upon lowlanders from western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic countries ascending to high altitude, the global population distribution of high-altitude residents encourages an increased emphasis on understanding high-altitude physiology, adaptation, epidemiology, and public health in the ∼500 million permanent high-altitude residents.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
High altitude introduces environmental stressors that are distinct from sea level. Hypobaric hypoxia, colder and drier climates, and increased radiation challenge reproductive success. In addition to the direct effects of high altitude, the health of high-altitude residents (particularly in rural communities) is compounded by vulnerability to food and water insecurity associated with land degradation and the concurrence of conflict and climate change. Population estimates for the number of humans residing at high altitude varies widely. Older estimates were either guesses or based upon assigning a percentage of select countries’ populations residing at high altitude. Cohen and Small produced gridded population estimates based on censuses and coregistered these demographic data with elevation data, estimating that 389.4 million live at >1,500 m. The prevailing assumption is that over 140 million humans live above 2,500 m. This is based on the 139 million estimated to be residing above 2,500 m in 1995 which was calculated by estimating the percentage of populations residing above 2,500 m in select countries (table 1 in ref. ). However, studies using geographic information system (GIS)-based approaches with updated georeferenced data have estimated that, in 2010, there were 83 million residents at >2,500 m, and, in 2017, 74.9 million lived at >2,500 m. These reports do not provide country-level estimates and provide population estimates only for select elevation ranges/thresholds. To understand the impact of life at high altitude on human physiology, adaptation, health, and disease, it is imperative to know how many humans live at high altitude and where they live. Herein, we estimate that 81.6 million humans live above 2500 m, and we provide population estimates at 500-m elevation intervals for every country.
Results
Over 500 million humans live at ≥1,500 m (6.58% of the total population), 219 million at ≥2,000 m (2.88% of the total population), 81.6 million at ≥2,500 m (1.07% of the total population), 25.2 million at ≥3,000 m (0.33% of the total population), 14.4 million at ≥3,500 m (0.19% of the total population), 6.4 million at ≥4,000 m (0.084% of the total population), 2 million at ≥4,500 m (0.027% of the total population), and 0.31 million at ≥5,000 m (0.004% of the total population). Table 1 presents the standard and model atmosphere-calculated barometric pressure, partial pressure of inspired oxygen, and global populations at 500-m elevation intervals.
Fig. 1 illustrates that high-altitude regions are present in all continents and shows the 10 most populated countries with altitudes of ≥1,500 m, ≥2,500 m, and ≥3,500 m, and the 10 countries with the greatest percentage of national population residing at ≥1,500 m, ≥2,500 m, and ≥3,500 m. Dataset S1 contains the estimated population at 500-m elevation intervals for every country.
Discussion
We used georeferenced population and elevation data to estimate the global and country-level population of humans at high altitude. We estimate that 81.6 million humans live at ≥2,500 m, and that these humans are primarily from non-Western countries. This figure is considerably less than non-GIS−based estimates and expands upon GIS-based estimates by providing country-level estimates at 500-m elevation intervals. We present population for 500-m intervals to provide flexible interpretation of “high altitude,” as the threshold for high altitude to elicit a physiological response varies between individuals and populations. Research is encouraged in countries with considerable high-altitude populations, to understand how the environmental stress (physiological and social) of high altitude impacts physiology, adaptation, health, and disease.
Where Do Humans Live at High Altitude?
Humans reside at high altitude in each continent; notably, the majority of humans at high altitude live in non-Western countries. As with medical research generally, high-altitude research has focused on the lowlander of European descent ascending to high altitude. Select permanent high-altitude populations have been studied, with considerable differences in physiological measures reported; however, the populations studied represent just a fraction of humans at high altitude. Among the studied populations, differences in candidate genetic variants that may be adaptive and their phenotypic associations have been identified. The distribution of where humans live at high altitude, presented herein, and their duration of high-altitude residence affords a broad natural experiment to better define the relationships between genotype and phenotype and provide insight into the evolutionary and mechanistic bases of physiological adaptations to high altitude. Further, an expanded understanding of the potential physiological differences arising from life at high altitude will lead to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of disease, ultimately improving the health and well-being of high-altitude populations.
Limitations.
Mobile, nomadic, or pastoralist populations and those with lowest income and most at risk are underrepresented in census data. Therefore, we have likely underestimated the most vulnerable populations and may have disproportionately undercounted rural high-altitude populations. The LandScan Global datasets are not recommended to be used as a change or migration tool, as the LandScan database is constantly improving its input data. Further, the LandScan dataset provides only a population count and not demographics (e.g., age, sex, ethnicity, etc.). Nevertheless, LandScan is the community standard for global population distribution.
Materials and Methods
Population estimates were calculated using QGIS 3.4.0-Madeira software. Population data were acquired from Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s LandScan Global 2019 dataset. LandScan provides an ambient population count for cells with a spatial resolution of 30 arc-seconds (∼1 km2). LandScan uses the best available census counts to estimate population and applies a spatial distribution model that includes land cover, roads, slope, urban areas, village locations, and high-resolution imagery analysis. The mean elevation data from the Global Multiresolution Terrain Elevation Data (GMTED2010) were also acquired at a resolution of 30 arc-seconds (∼1 km2). Country borders were acquired from the Database of Global Administrative Areas (GADM, version 3.6; https://gadm.org/download_country_v3.html). Further details on the methodology are provided in SI Appendix.
References 15
- 1.
L. G. Moore, Measuring high-altitude adaptation. J. Appl. Physiol. 123, 1371–1385 (2017 ).
Not in our library10.1152/japplphysiol.00321.2017
- 2.
R. Romeo, F. Grita, F. Parisi, L. Russo, Vulnerability of Mountain Peoples to Food Insecurity: Updated Data and Analysis of Drivers (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2020 ).
Not in our library
- 3.
R. Hock., “High mountain areas” in IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, H.-O. Pörtner., Eds. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019 ), pp. 131−202.
Not in our library
- 4.
G. F. De Jong, Demography and research with high altitude populations. Soc. Biol. 17, 114–119 (1970 ).
Not in our library10.1080/19485565.1970.9987853
- 5.
P. T. Baker, “The adaptive fitness of high-altitude populations” in The Biology of High-Altitude Peoples, P. T. Baker, Ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1978 ), pp. 317–350.
Not in our library
- 6.
L. G. Moore, Altitude-aggravated illness: Examples from pregnancy and prenatal life. Ann. Emerg. Med. 16, 965–973 (1987 ).
Not in our library10.1016/s0196-0644(87)80742-4
- 7.
J. E. Cohen, C. Small, Hypsographic demography: The distribution of human population by altitude. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 14009–14014 (1998 ).
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.95.24.14009
- 8.
L. G. Moore, S. Niermeyer, S. Zamudio, Human adaptation to high altitude: Regional and life-cycle perspectives. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 107, 25–64 (1998 ).
Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(1998)107:27+<25::aid-ajpa3>3.0.co;2-l
- 9.
B. Huddleston., Towards a GIS-based analysis of mountain environments and populations. Environment and Natural Resources Working paper No. 10., (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2003). http://www.fao.org/3/a-y4558e.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2021.
Not in our library
- 10.
C. M. Beall, Adaptation to high altitude: Phenotypes and genotypes. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 43, 251–272 (2014 ).
Not in our library
- 11.
M. D. Gurven, D. E. Lieberman, WEIRD bodies: Mismatch, medicine and missing diversity. Evol. Hum. Behav. 41, 330–340 (2020 ).
Not in our library10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.04.001
- 12.
V. Heggie, Blood, race and indigenous peoples in twentieth century extreme physiology. Hist. Philos. Life Sci. 41, 26 (2019 ).
Not in our library10.1007/s40656-019-0264-z
- 13.
R. A. Carr-Hill, Measuring progress toward the millennium development goals and the missing millions. World Health Popul. 14, 4–11 (2013 ).
Not in our library10.12927/whp.2013.23270
- 14.
A. N. Rose., “LandScan 2019” (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2020). https://landscan.ornl.gov/. Accessed 20 November 2020.
Not in our library
- 15.
J. J. Danielson, D. B. Gesch, “Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010)” (US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1073, 2011).. Accessed 4 January 2021.
Not in our library10.5066/f7j38r2n
Cited by papers we hold 1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.