Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 4, 2026.

Dual nature of human ACE2 glycosylation in binding to SARS-CoV-2 spike

Ahmad Reza Mehdipour, Gerhard Hummer

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021 · CC BY

doi:10.1073/pnas.2100425118

Abstract

Significance The SARS-CoV-2 virus infects cells by docking the spike protein at its surface to a receptor protein exposed on human cells. Both receptor and spike are covered by sugars. With molecular dynamics simulations, we show that sugars attached to the N90 site of the human receptor interfere with binding to the virus, explaining reports of increased susceptibility to infection if N90 glycosylation is lost. By contrast, sugars at the human receptor N322 site strengthen the binding to spike by latching onto a site on spike that is targeted also by neutralizing antibodies. By characterizing the contrasting roles of sugars in the interaction between virus and host cells, we aid in the targeted development of neutralizing antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 fusion inhibitors.

References 44

  1. 1.

    M. Donoghue., A novel angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase (ACE2) converts angiotensin I to angiotensin 1-9. Circ. Res. 87, E1–E9 (2000 ).

    Not in our library10.1161/01.res.87.5.e1

  2. 2.

    I. Hamming., Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 203, 631–637 (2004 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/path.1570

  3. 3.

    M. A. Chamsi-Pasha, Z. Shao, W. H. Tang, Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 as a therapeutic target for heart failure. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 11, 58–63 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1007/s11897-013-0178-0

  4. 4.

    M. Hoffmann., SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280.e8 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

  5. 5.

    W. Li., Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426, 450–454 (2003 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02145

  6. 6.
  7. 7.

    J. Lan., Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581, 215–220 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5

  8. 8.

    J. Shang., Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature 581, 221–224 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y

  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    C. Böhmer., Characterization of mouse amino acid transporter B0AT1 (slc6a19). Biochem. J. 389, 745–751 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20050083

  11. 11.

    S. M. Camargo., Tissue-specific amino acid transporter partners ACE2 and collectrin differentially interact with hartnup mutations. Gastroenterology 136, 872–882 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.055

  12. 12.

    C. Wu, S. Zheng, Y. Chen, M. Zheng, Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCoV, in the nasal tissue. MedRxiv [Preprint] (2020 ). (Accessed 1 July 2020).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.02.11.20022228

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    A. Shajahan., Comprehensive characterization of N- and O- glycosylation of SARS-CoV-2 human receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2. Glycobiology, (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwaa101

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    J. de Andrade, P. F. B. Gonçalves, P. A. Netz, Why does the novel coronavirus spike protein interact so strongly with the human ACE2? A thermodynamic answer. Chembiochem 22, 865–875 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/cbic.202000455

  17. 17.

    H. Liu., Computational simulations reveal the binding dynamics between human ACE2 and the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Quant. Biol. 9, 61–72 (2021 ).

    Not in our library

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    P. Zhao., Virus-receptor interactions of glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 spike and human ACE2 receptor. Cell Host Microbe 28, 586–601.e6 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2020.08.004

  20. 20.

    F. Li, W. Li, M. Farzan, S. C. Harrison, Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Science 309, 1864–1868 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1116480

  21. 21.

    W. Li., Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J. 24, 1634–1643 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7600640

  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    D. J. Benton., Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion. Nature 588, 327–330 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2772-0

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    M. Yuan., A highly conserved cryptic epitope in the receptor binding domains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Science 368, 630–633 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abb7269

  28. 28.

    D. Wrapp., Structural basis for potent neutralization of betacoronaviruses by single-domain camelid antibodies. Cell 181, 1004–1015.e15 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.031

  29. 29.

    S. Jo, K. C. Song, H. Desaire, A. D. MacKerell Jr, W. Im, Glycan reader: Automated sugar identification and simulation preparation for carbohydrates and glycoproteins. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 3135–3141 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21886

  30. 30.

    S. Jo, W. Im, Glycan fragment database: A database of PDB-based glycan 3D structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D470–D474 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks987

  31. 31.

    S.-J. Park., Glycan Reader is improved to recognize most sugar types and chemical modifications in the Protein Data Bank. Bioinformatics 33, 3051–3057 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btx358

  32. 32.

    S.-J. Park., CHARMM-GUI Glycan Modeler for modeling and simulation of carbohydrates and glycoconjugates. Glycobiology 29, 320–331 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwz003

  33. 33.

    M. J. Abraham., GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1, 19–25 (2015 ).

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    E. L. Wu., CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 35, 1997–2004 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.23702

  35. 35.

    H. J. Berendsen, J. van Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, J. R. Haak, Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984 ).

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A Gen. Phys. 31, 1695–1697 (1985 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreva.31.1695

  37. 37.

    M. Parrinello, A. Rahman, Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981 ).

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    R. B. Best., Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3257–3273 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/ct300400x

  39. 39.

    J. B. Klauda., Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: Validation on six lipid types. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7830–7843 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/jp101759q

  40. 40.

    W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, K. Schulten, VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 14, 33–38 (1996 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5

  41. 41.

    N. Michaud-Agrawal, E. J. Denning, T. B. Woolf, O. Beckstein, MDAnalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2319–2327 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21787

  42. 42.

    R. B. Best, G. Hummer, W. A. Eaton, Native contacts determine protein folding mechanisms in atomistic simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 17874–17879 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1311599110

  43. 43.
  44. 44.

    P. Di Tommaso., T-coffee: A web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W13–W17 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkr245

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.