DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models

Abstract

DeePMD-kit is a powerful open-source software package that facilitates molecular dynamics simulations using machine learning potentials known as Deep Potential (DP) models. This package, which was released in 2017, has been widely used in the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, and material science for studying atomistic systems. The current version of DeePMD-kit offers numerous advanced features, such as DeepPot-SE, attention-based and hybrid descriptors, the ability to fit tensile properties, type embedding, model deviation, DP-range correction, DP long range, graphics processing unit support for customized operators, model compression, non-von Neumann molecular dynamics, and improved usability, including documentation, compiled binary packages, graphical user interfaces, and application programming interfaces. This article presents an overview of the current major version of the DeePMD-kit package, highlighting its features and technical details. Additionally, this article presents a comprehensive procedure for conducting molecular dynamics as a representative application, benchmarks the accuracy and efficiency of different models, and discusses ongoing developments.

References 176

1. 1.

   J. Behler and M. Parrinello, “Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.98.146401

2. 2.

   A. P. Bartók, M. C. Payne, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, “Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403

3. 3.

   J. Behler, “Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials,” J. Chem. Phys. 134, 074106 (2011 ).

   Not in our library10.1063/1.3553717

4. 4.

   M. Gastegger, L. Schwiedrzik, M. Bittermann, F. Berzsenyi, and P. Marquetand, “wACSF—Weighted atom-centered symmetry functions as descriptors in machine learning potentials,” J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241709 (2018 ).

   Not in our library10.1063/1.5019667

5. 5.

   S. Chmiela, A. Tkatchenko, H. E. Sauceda, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Schütt, and K.-R. Müller, “Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields,” Sci. Adv. 3, e1603015 (2017 ).

   Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.1603015

6. 6.
   Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks · 2017

   No notice
7. 7.

   K. T. Schütt, H. E. Sauceda, P.-J. Kindermans, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. Müller, “SchNet—A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials,” J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241722 (2018 ).

   Not in our library10.1063/1.5019779

8. 8.

   X. Chen, M. S. Jørgensen, J. Li, and B. Hammer, “Atomic energies from a convolutional neural network,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 3933–3942 (2018 ).

   Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00149

9. 9.

   L. Zhang, J. Han, H. Wang, R. Car, and W. E, “Deep potential molecular dynamics: A scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 143001 (2018 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.120.143001

10. 10.

    L. Zhang, J. Han, H. Wang, W. Saidi, R. Car, and W. E, “End-to-end symmetry preserving inter-atomic potential energy model for finite and extended systems,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc., 2018 ), Vol. 31, pp. 4436–4446.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Y. Zhang, C. Hu, and B. Jiang, “Embedded atom neural network potentials: Efficient and accurate machine learning with a physically inspired representation,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 4962–4967 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02037

12. 12.

    J. S. Smith, O. Isayev, and A. E. Roitberg, “ANI-1: An extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost,” Chem. Sci. 8, 3192–3203 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/c6sc05720a

13. 13.

    O. T. Unke and M. Meuwly, “PhysNet: A neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3678–3693 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00181

14. 14.

    Z. L. Glick, D. P. Metcalf, A. Koutsoukas, S. A. Spronk, D. L. Cheney, and C. D. Sherrill, “AP-Net: An atomic-pairwise neural network for smooth and transferable interaction potentials,” J. Chem. Phys. 153, 044112 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0011521

15. 15.

    T. Zubatiuk and O. Isayev, “Development of multimodal machine learning potentials: Toward a physics-aware artificial intelligence,” Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 1575–1585 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00868

16. 16.

    E. R. Khajehpasha, J. A. Finkler, T. D. Kühne, and S. A. Ghasemi, “CENT2: Improved charge equilibration via neural network technique,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 144106 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.105.144106

17. 17.

    X. Pan, J. Yang, R. Van, E. Epifanovsky, J. Ho, J. Huang, J. Pu, Y. Mei, K. Nam, and Y. Shao, “Machine-learning-assisted free energy simulation of solution-phase and enzyme reactions,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 5745–5758 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00565

18. 18.
    Towards universal neural network potential for material discovery applicable to arbitrary combination of 45 elements · 2022

    No notice
19. 19.
    Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics · 2023

    No notice
20. 20.

    K. T. Schütt, O. T. Unke, and M. Gastegger, “Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectra,” in International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, 2021 ), pp. 9377–9388.

    Not in our library

21. 21.
    E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials · 2022

    No notice
22. 22.

    M. Haghighatlari, J. Li, X. Guan, O. Zhang, A. Das, C. J. Stein, F. Heidar-Zadeh, M. Liu, M. Head-Gordon, L. Bertels et al., “NewtonNet: A Newtonian message passing network for deep learning of interatomic potentials and forces,” Digital Discovery 1, 333–343 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/d2dd00008c

23. 23.

    J. Gasteiger, F. Becker, and S. Günnemann, “GemNet: Universal directional graph neural networks for molecules,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc., 2021 ), Vol. 34, pp. 6790–6802.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    C. Chen and S. P. Ong, “A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table,” Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 718–728 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s43588-022-00349-3

25. 25.

    R. Drautz, “Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.99.014104

26. 26.

    D. P. Kovács, C. van der Oord, J. Kucera, A. E. A. Allen, D. J. Cole, C. Ortner, and G. Csányi, “Linear atomic cluster expansion force fields for organic molecules: Beyond RMSE,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 7696–7711 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00647

27. 27.

    R. Snyder, B. Kim, X. Pan, Y. Shao, and J. Pu, “Facilitating ab initio QM/MM free energy simulations by Gaussian process regression with derivative observations,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 25134–25143 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/d2cp02820d

28. 28.

    A. P. Thompson, L. P. Swiler, C. R. Trott, S. M. Foiles, and G. J. Tucker, “Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials,” J. Comput. Phys. 285, 316–330 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018

29. 29.

    H. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Han, and W. E, “DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 228, 178–184 (2018 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2018.03.016

30. 30.

    K. T. Schütt, P. Kessel, M. Gastegger, K. A. Nicoli, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. Müller, “SchNetPack: A deep learning toolbox for atomistic systems,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 448–455 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00908

31. 31.

    S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, I. Poltavsky, K.-R. Müller, and A. Tkatchenko, “sGDML: Constructing accurate and data efficient molecular force fields using machine learning,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 240, 38–45 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2019.02.007

32. 32.

    K. Lee, D. Yoo, W. Jeong, and S. Han, “SIMPLE-NN: An efficient package for training and executing neural- network interatomic potentials,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 242, 95–103 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2019.04.014

33. 33.

    X. Gao, F. Ramezanghorbani, O. Isayev, J. S. Smith, and A. E. Roitberg, “TorchANI: A free and open source PyTorch-based deep learning implementation of the ANI neural network potentials,” J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 3408–3415 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00451

34. 34.

    P. O. Dral, F. Ge, B.-X. Xue, Y.-F. Hou, M. Pinheiro, Jr., J. Huang, and M. Barbatti, “MLatom 2: An integrative platform for atomistic machine learning,” Top. Curr. Chem. 379, 27 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1007/s41061-021-00339-5

35. 35.

    A. Singraber, J. Behler, and C. Dellago, “Library-based LAMMPS implementation of high-dimensional neural network potentials,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1827–1840 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00770

36. 36.

    Y. Zhang, J. Xia, and B. Jiang, “REANN: A PyTorch-based end-to-end multi-functional deep neural network package for molecular, reactive, and periodic systems,” J. Chem. Phys. 156, 114801 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0080766

37. 37.

    K. T. Schütt, S. S. P. Hessmann, N. W. A. Gebauer, J. Lederer, and M. Gastegger, “SchNetPack 2.0: A neural network toolbox for atomistic machine learning,” J. Chem. Phys. 158, 144801 (2023 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0138367

38. 38.

    Z. Fan, Y. Wang, P. Ying, K. Song, J. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Zeng, K. Xu, E. Lindgren, J. M. Rahm, A. J. Gabourie, J. Liu, H. Dong, J. Wu, Y. Chen, Z. Zhong, J. Sun, P. Erhart, Y. Su, and T. Ala-Nissila, “GPUMD: A package for constructing accurate machine-learned potentials and performing highly efficient atomistic simulations,” J. Chem. Phys. 157, 114801 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0106617

39. 39.

    I. S. Novikov, K. Gubaev, E. V. Podryabinkin, and A. V. Shapeev, “The MLIP package: Moment tensor potentials with MPI and active learning,” Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 2, 025002 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/2632-2153/abc9fe

40. 40.

    H. Yanxon, D. Zagaceta, B. Tang, D. S. Matteson, and Q. Zhu, “PyXtal_FF: A python library for automated force field generation,” Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 2, 027001 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/2632-2153/abc940

41. 41.

    W. Jia, H. Wang, M. Chen, D. Lu, L. Lin, R. Car, W. E, and L. Zhang, “Pushing the limit of molecular dynamics with ab initio accuracy to 100 million atoms with machine learning,” in Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC’20 (IEEE Press, 2020 ).

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    Z. Guo, D. Lu, Y. Yan, S. Hu, R. Liu, G. Tan, N. Sun, W. Jiang, L. Liu, Y. Chen, L. Zhang, M. Chen, H. Wang, and W. Jia, “Extending the limit of molecular dynamics with ab initio accuracy to 10 billion atoms,” in PPoPP’22: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2022 ), pp. 205–218.

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    J. Behler, “Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations,” J. Chem. Phys. 145, 170901 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/1.4966192

44. 44.

    K. T. Butler, D. W. Davies, H. Cartwright, O. Isayev, and A. Walsh, “Machine learning for molecular and materials science,” Nature 559, 547–555 (2018 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2

45. 45.

    F. Noé, A. Tkatchenko, K.-R. Müller, and C. Clementi, “Machine learning for molecular simulation,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71, 361–390 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052331

46. 46.

    O. T. Unke, S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, M. Gastegger, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Schütt, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. Müller, “Machine learning force fields,” Chem. Rev. 121, 10142–10186 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111

47. 47.

    M. Pinheiro, Jr., F. Ge, N. Ferré, P. O. Dral, and M. Barbatti, “Choosing the right molecular machine learning potential,” Chem. Sci. 12, 14396–14413 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/d1sc03564a

48. 48.

    S. Manzhos and T. Carrington, Jr., “Neural network potential energy surfaces for small molecules and reactions,” Chem. Rev. 121, 10187–10217 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00665

49. 49.

    J. Zeng, L. Cao, and T. Zhu, “Neural network potentials,” in Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Machine Learning, edited by P. O. Dral (Elsevier, 2022 ), Chap. 12, pp. 279–294.

    Not in our library

50. 50.

    X. Wang, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, F. Dai, and H. Wang, “A tungsten deep neural-network potential for simulating mechanical property degradation under fusion service environment,” Nucl. Fusion 62, 126013 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/1741-4326/ac888b

51. 51.

    D. Zhang, H. Bi, F.-Z. Dai, W. Jiang, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “DPA-1: Pretraining of attention-based deep potential model for molecular simulation,” arXiv.2208.08236 (preprint) (2022 ).

    Not in our library

52. 52.

    J. Zeng, T. J. Giese, Ş. Ekesan, and D. M. York, “Development of range-corrected deep learning potentials for fast, accurate quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical simulations of chemical reactions in solution,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 6993–7009 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00201

53. 53.

    L. Zhang, H. Wang, M. C. Muniz, A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, R. Car, and W. E, “A deep potential model with long-range electrostatic interactions,” J. Chem. Phys. 156, 124107 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0083669

54. 54.

    W. Liang, J. Zeng, D. M. York, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Learning DeePMD-kit: A guide to building deep potential models,” in A Practical Guide to Recent Advances in Multiscale Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecules, edited by Y. Wang and R. Zhou (AIP Publishing, 2023 ), Chap. 6, pp. 1–20.

    Not in our library

55. 55.

    T. Wen, L. Zhang, H. Wang, W. E, and D. J. Srolovitz, “Deep potentials for materials science,” Mater. Futures 1, 022601 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/2752-5724/ac681d

56. 56.

    S. K. Achar, L. Zhang, and J. K. Johnson, “Efficiently trained deep learning potential for graphane,” J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 14874–14882 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01411

57. 57.

    L. Bonati and M. Parrinello, “Silicon liquid structure and crystal nucleation from ab initio deep metadynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 265701 (2018 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.121.265701

58. 58.

    J. Wang, H. Shen, R. Yang, K. Xie, C. Zhang, L. Chen, K.-M. Ho, C.-Z. Wang, and S. Wang, “A deep learning interatomic potential developed for atomistic simulation of carbon materials,” Carbon 186, 1–8 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbon.2021.09.062

59. 59.

    R. Li, E. Lee, and T. Luo, “A unified deep neural network potential capable of predicting thermal conductivity of silicon in different phases,” Mater. Today Phys. 12, 100181 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100181

60. 60.

    I. A. Balyakin, S. V. Rempel, R. E. Ryltsev, and A. A. Rempel, “Deep machine learning interatomic potential for liquid silica,” Phys. Rev. E 102, 052125 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.102.052125

61. 61.

    H.-Y. Ko, L. Zhang, B. Santra, H. Wang, W. E, R. A. DiStasio, Jr., and R. Car, “Isotope effects in liquid water via deep potential molecular dynamics,” Mol. Phys. 117, 3269–3281 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1080/00268976.2019.1652366

62. 62.

    J. Xu, C. Zhang, L. Zhang, M. Chen, B. Santra, and X. Wu, “Isotope effects in molecular structures and electronic properties of liquid water via deep potential molecular dynamics based on the SCAN functional,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 214113 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.102.214113

63. 63.

    C. Andreani, G. Romanelli, A. Parmentier, R. Senesi, A. I. Kolesnikov, H.-Y. Ko, M. F. Calegari Andrade, and R. Car, “Hydrogen dynamics in supercritical water probed by neutron scattering and computer simulations,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 9461–9467 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02547

64. 64.

    C. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Xu, F. Tang, B. Santra, and X. Wu, “Isotope effects in x-ray absorption spectra of liquid water,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 115155 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.102.115155

65. 65.

    T. E. Gartner III, L. Zhang, P. M. Piaggi, R. Car, A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, and P. G. Debenedetti, “Signatures of a liquid–liquid transition in an ab initio deep neural network model for water,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117, 26040–26046 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2015440117

66. 66.

    D. Tisi, L. Zhang, R. Bertossa, H. Wang, R. Car, and S. Baroni, “Heat transport in liquid water from first-principles and deep neural network simulations,” Phys. Rev. B 104, 224202 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.104.224202

67. 67.

    C. Malosso, L. Zhang, R. Car, S. Baroni, and D. Tisi, “Viscosity in water from first-principles and deep-neural-network simulations,” npj Comput. Mater. 8, 139 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41524-022-00830-7

68. 68.

    Y. Shi, C. C. Doyle, and T. L. Beck, “Condensed phase water molecular multipole moments from deep neural network models trained on ab initio simulation data,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 10310–10317 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02328

69. 69.

    F. Matusalem, J. Santos Rego, and M. de Koning, “Plastic deformation of superionic water ices,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2203397119 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2203397119

70. 70.

    Y. Zhai, A. Caruso, S. L. Bore, Z. Luo, and F. Paesani, “A ‘short blanket’ dilemma for a state-of-the-art neural network potential for water: Reproducing experimental properties or the physics of the underlying many-body interactions?,” J. Chem. Phys. 158, 084111 (2023 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0142843

71. 71.

    S. L. Bore and F. Paesani, “Realistic phase diagram of water from “first principles” data-driven quantum simulations,” Nat Commun 14, 3349 (2023 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-023-38855-1

72. 72.

    J. Zeng, Y. Tao, T. J. Giese, and D. M. York, “QDπ: A quantum deep potential interaction model for drug discovery,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 1261–1275 (2023 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01172

73. 73.
    Dissolving salt is not equivalent to applying a pressure on water · 2022

    Not checked
74. 74.

    M. Yang, L. Bonati, D. Polino, and M. Parrinello, “Using metadynamics to build neural network potentials for reactive events: The case of urea decomposition in water,” Catal. Today 387, 143–149 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cattod.2021.03.018

75. 75.

    T. J. Giese, J. Zeng, Ş. Ekesan, and D. M. York, “Combined QM/MM, machine learning path integral approach to compute free energy profiles and kinetic isotope effects in RNA cleavage reactions,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 4304–4317 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00151

76. 76.

    J. Liu, R. Liu, Y. Cao, and M. Chen, “Solvation structures of calcium and magnesium ions in water with the presence of hydroxide: A study by deep potential molecular dynamics,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 983–993 (2023 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/d2cp04105g

77. 77.
    Complex reaction processes in combustion unraveled by neural network-based molecular dynamics simulation · 2020

    Not checked
78. 78.

    J. Zeng, L. Zhang, H. Wang, and T. Zhu, “Exploring the chemical space of linear alkane pyrolysis via deep potential GENerator,” Energy Fuels 35, 762–769 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03211

79. 79.

    Q. Chu, K. H. Luo, and D. Chen, “Exploring complex reaction networks using neural network-based molecular dynamics simulation,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 4052–4057 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00647

80. 80.

    B. Wang, J. Zeng, L. Cao, C.-H. Chin, D. York, T. Zhu, and J. Zhang, “Growth of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and soot inception by in silico simulation,” chemrxiv-2022-qp8fc (2022 ).

    Not in our library

81. 81.

    Z. Wang, Y. Han, J. Li, and X. He, “Combining the fragmentation approach and neural network potential energy surfaces of fragments for accurate calculation of protein energy,” J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 3027–3035 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c01370

82. 82.

    Y. Han, Z. Wang, Z. Wei, J. Liu, and J. Li, “Machine learning builds full-QM precision protein force fields in seconds,” Briefings Bioinf. 22, bbab158 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/bib/bbab158

83. 83.

    M. F. Calegari Andrade, H.-Y. Ko, L. Zhang, R. Car, and A. Selloni, “Free energy of proton transfer at the water-TiO2 interface from ab initio deep potential molecular dynamics,” Chem. Sci. 11, 2335–2341 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/c9sc05116c

84. 84.

    M. Galib and D. T. Limmer, “Reactive uptake of N2O5 by atmospheric aerosol is dominated by interfacial processes,” Science 371, 921–925 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abd7716

85. 85.

    Y.-B. Zhuang, R.-H. Bi, and J. Cheng, “Resolving the odd–even oscillation of water dissociation at rutile TiO2(110)–water interface by machine learning accelerated molecular dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys. 157, 164701 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0126333

86. 86.

    M. de la Puente, R. David, A. Gomez, and D. Laage, “Acids at the edge: Why nitric and formic acid dissociations at air–water interfaces depend on depth and on interface specific area,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 10524–10529 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.2c03099

87. 87.

    S. P. Niblett, M. Galib, and D. T. Limmer, “Learning intermolecular forces at liquid-vapor interfaces,” J. Chem. Phys. 155, 164101 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0067565

88. 88.

    L. Zhang, H. Wang, R. Car, and W. E, “Phase diagram of a deep potential water model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 236001 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.126.236001

89. 89.

    J. Zeng, Y. Tao, T. J. Giese, and D. M. York, “Modern semiempirical electronic structure methods and machine learning potentials for drug discovery: Conformers, tautomers, and protonation states,” J. Chem. Phys. 158, 124110 (2023 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0139281

90. 90.

    W.-K. Chen, X.-Y. Liu, W.-H. Fang, P. O. Dral, and G. Cui, “Deep learning for nonadiabatic excited-state dynamics,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 6702–6708 (2018 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03026

91. 91.

    C. Vega and J. L. F. Abascal, “Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: A general perspective,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 19663–19688 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/c1cp22168j

92. 92.

    E. Sanz, C. Vega, J. L. F. Abascal, and L. G. MacDowell, “Phase diagram of water from computer simulation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 255701 (2004 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.92.255701

93. 93.

    T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, “Particle mesh Ewald: An N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems,” J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/1.464397

94. 94.

    T. J. Giese, M. T. Panteva, H. Chen, and D. M. York, “Multipolar Ewald methods, 1: Theory, accuracy, and performance,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 436–450 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/ct5007983

95. 95.

    T. J. Giese, M. T. Panteva, H. Chen, and D. M. York, “Multipolar Ewald methods, 2: Applications using a quantum mechanical force field,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 451–461 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/ct500799g

96. 96.

    K. Nam, J. Gao, and D. M. York, “An efficient linear-scaling Ewald method for long-range electrostatic interactions in combined QM/MM calculations,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 1, 2–13 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/ct049941i

97. 97.

    T. J. Giese and D. M. York, “Ambient-potential composite Ewald method for ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics simulation,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 2611–2632 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00198

98. 98.

    T. J. Giese, M. Huang, H. Chen, and D. M. York, “Recent advances toward a general purpose linear-scaling quantum force field,” Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 2812–2820 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/ar500103g

99. 99.

    T. J. Giese and D. M. York, “Quantum mechanical force fields for condensed phase molecular simulations,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 383002 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-648x/aa7c5c

100. 100.

     T. J. Giese, J. Zeng, and D. M. York, “Multireference generalization of the weighted thermodynamic perturbation method,” J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 8519–8533 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.2c06201

101. 101.

     T. J. Martínez, “Ab initio reactive computer aided molecular design,” Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 652–656 (2017 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00010

102. 102.

     J. Zeng, L. Cao, C.-H. Chin, H. Ren, J. Z. H. Zhang, and T. Zhu, “ReacNetGenerator: An automatic reaction network generator for reactive molecular dynamics simulations,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 683–691 (2020 ).

     Not in our library10.1039/c9cp05091d

103. 103.

     L. Zhang, D.-Y. Lin, H. Wang, R. Car, and W. E, “Active learning of uniformly accurate interatomic potentials for materials simulation,” Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 023804 (2019 ).

     Not in our library10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.023804

104. 104.

     L. Cao, J. Zeng, B. Wang, T. Zhu, and J. Z. Zhang, “Ab initio neural network MD simulation of thermal decomposition of high energy material CL-20/TNT,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 11801–11811 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1039/d2cp00710j

105. 105.

     L. Zhang, M. Chen, X. Wu, H. Wang, W. E, and R. Car, “Deep neural network for the dielectric response of insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 041121 (2020 ).

     Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.102.041121

106. 106.

     G. M. Sommers, M. F. C. Andrade, L. Zhang, H. Wang, and R. Car, “Raman spectrum and polarizability of liquid water from deep neural networks,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 10592–10602 (2020 ).

     Not in our library10.1039/d0cp01893g

107. 107.

     Y. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Chen, J. Zeng, L. Zhang, W. Han, and W. E, “DP-GEN: A concurrent learning platform for the generation of reliable deep learning based potential energy models,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 253, 107206 (2020 ).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107206

108. 108.

     D. Lu, H. Wang, M. Chen, L. Lin, R. Car, W. E, W. Jia, and L. Zhang, “86 PFLOPS deep potential molecular dynamics simulation of 100 million atoms with ab initio accuracy,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 259, 107624 (2021 ).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107624

109. 109.

     D. Lu, W. Jiang, Y. Chen, L. Zhang, W. Jia, H. Wang, and M. Chen, “DP compress: A model compression scheme for generating efficient deep potential models,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 5559–5567 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00102

110. 110.

     P. Mo, C. Li, D. Zhao, Y. Zhang, M. Shi, J. Li, and J. Liu, “Accurate and efficient molecular dynamics based on machine learning and non von Neumann architecture,” npj Comput. Mater. 8, 107 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1038/s41524-022-00773-z

111. 111.

     K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Identity mappings in deep residual networks,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2016 (Springer International Publishing, 2016 ), pp. 630–645.

     Not in our library

112. 112.

     V. Nair and G. E. Hinton, “Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines,” in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’10) (Omnipress, Madison, WI, 2010 ), pp. 807–814.

     Not in our library

113. 113.

     X. Glorot, A. Bordes, and Y. Bengio, “Deep sparse rectifier neural networks,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, edited by G. Gordon, D. Dunson, and M. Dudík (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 2011 ), Vol. 15, pp. 315–323.

     Not in our library

114. 114.

     D. Hendrycks and K. Gimpel, “Gaussian error linear units (GELUs),” arXiv:1606.08415 [cs.LG] (2020 ).

     Not in our library

115. 115.

     L. Chanussot, A. Das, S. Goyal, T. Lavril, M. Shuaibi, M. Riviere, K. Tran, J. Heras-Domingo, C. Ho, W. Hu, A. Palizhati, A. Sriram, B. Wood, J. Yoon, D. Parikh, C. L. Zitnick, and Z. Ulissi, “Open catalyst 2020 (OC20) dataset and community challenges,” ACS Catal. 11, 6059–6072 (2021 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acscatal.0c04525

116. 116.

     J. Gasteiger, M. Shuaibi, A. Sriram, S. Günnemann, Z. Ulissi, C. L. Zitnick, and A. Das, “GemNet-OC: Developing graph neural networks for large and diverse molecular simulation datasets,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research (published online, 2022); available at https://dblp.org/db/journals/tmlr/tmlr2022.html [cs.LG] (2022 ).

     Not in our library

117. 117.

     A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. u. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017 ), Vol. 30.

     Not in our library

118. 118.

     M.-T. Luong, H. Pham, and C. D. Manning, “Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Lisbon, Portugal, 2015 ), pp. 1412–1421

     Not in our library10.18653/v1/d15-1166

119. 119.

     Y. Zhang, C. Gao, Q. Liu, L. Zhang, H. Wang, and M. Chen, “Warm dense matter simulation via electron temperature dependent deep potential molecular dynamics,” Phys. Plasmas 27, 122704 (2020 ).

     Not in our library10.1063/5.0023265

120. 120.

     T.-S. Lee, D. S. Cerutti, D. Mermelstein, C. Lin, S. LeGrand, T. J. Giese, A. Roitberg, D. A. Case, R. C. Walker, and D. M. York, “GPU-accelerated molecular dynamics and free energy methods in Amber18: Performance enhancements and new features,” J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 2043–2050 (2018 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00462

121. 121.

     J. Yang, Y. Cong, and H. Li, “A new machine learning approach based on range corrected deep potential model for efficient vibrational frequency computation,” arXiv:2303.15969 (2023 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00386

122. 122.

     J. F. Ziegler and J. P. Biersack, “The stopping and range of ions in matter,” in Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science: Volume 6: Astrophysics, Chemistry, and Condensed Matter, edited by D. A. Bromley (Springer, Boston, MA, 1985 ), pp. 93–129.

     Not in our library

123. 123.

     H. Wang, X. Guo, L. Zhang, H. Wang, and J. Xue, “Deep learning inter-atomic potential model for accurate irradiation damage simulations,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 244101 (2019 ).

     Not in our library10.1063/1.5098061

124. 124.

     D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015.

     Not in our library

125. 125.

     M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro, G. S. Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, S. Ghemawat, I. Goodfellow, A. Harp, G. Irving, M. Isard, Y. Jia, R. Jozefowicz, L. Kaiser, M. Kudlur, J. Levenberg, D. Mané, R. Monga, S. Moore, D. Murray, C. Olah, M. Schuster, J. Shlens, B. Steiner, I. Sutskever, K. Talwar, P. Tucker, V. Vanhoucke, V. Vasudevan, F. Viégas, O. Vinyals, P. Warden, M. Wattenberg, M. Wicke, Y. Yu, and X. Zheng, TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, 2015, software available from tensorflow.org.

     Not in our library

126. 126.

     J. Nickolls, I. Buck, M. Garland, and K. Skadron, “Scalable parallel programming with CUDA: Is CUDA the parallel programming model that application developers have been waiting for?,” Queue 6, 40–53 (2008 ).

     Not in our library10.1145/1365490.1365500

127. 127.

     AMD, Inc., ROCm—Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing, 2023.

     Not in our library

128. 128.
     Array programming with NumPy · 2020

     No notice
129. 129.

     A. Collette, Python and HDF5: Unlocking Scientific Data (O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2013 ).

     Not in our library

130. 130.

     K. Martin and B. Hoffman, Mastering CMake: Version 3.1, Kitware Incorporated, 2015.

     Not in our library

131. 131.

     J.-C. Fillion-Robin, M. McCormick, O. Padron, M. Smolens, M. Grauer, and M. Sarahan, jcfr/scipy_2018_scikit-build_talk: Scipy 2018 talk—Scikit-build: A build system generator for cpython c/c++/fortran/cython extensions, 2018.

     Not in our library

132. 132.

     G. Van Rossum and Python Development Team, The Python Library Reference, 12th Media Services, Suwanee, GA, 2018.

     Not in our library

133. 133.

     Google, Inc., GoogleTest–Google Testing and Mocking Framework, 2023.

     Not in our library

134. 134.

     L. Dagum and R. Menon, “OpenMP: An industry standard API for shared-memory programming,” IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. 5, 46–55 (1998 ).

     Not in our library10.1109/99.660313

135. 135.

     E. Gabriel, G. E. Fagg, G. Bosilca, T. Angskun, J. J. Dongarra, J. M. Squyres, V. Sahay, P. Kambadur, B. Barrett, A. Lumsdaine, R. H. Castain, D. J. Daniel, R. L. Graham, and T. S. Woodall, “Open MPI: Goals, concept, and design of a next generation MPI implementation,” in Recent Advances in Parallel Virtual Machine and Message Passing Interface, edited by D. Kranzlmüller, P. Kacsuk, and J. Dongarra (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004 ), pp. 97–104.

     Not in our library

136. 136.

     W. Gropp, “MPICH2: A new start for MPI implementations,” in Recent Advances in Parallel Virtual Machine and Message Passing Interface (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002 ), p. 7.

     Not in our library

137. 137.

     A. Sergeev and M. Del Balso, “Horovod: Fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow,” arXiv:1802.05799 (2018 ).

     Not in our library

138. 138.

     P. Goyal, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, P. Noordhuis, L. Wesolowski, A. Kyrola, A. Tulloch, Y. Jia, and K. He, “Accurate, large minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 hour,” arXiv:1706.02677 (2017 ).

     Not in our library

139. 139.

     L. Dalcin and Y.-L. L. Fang, “mpi4py: Status update after 12 years of development,” Comput. Sci. Eng. 23, 47–54 (2021 ).33967632

     Not in our library10.1109/mcse.2021.3083216

140. 140.

     A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, “LAMMPS—A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171

141. 141.

     D. A. Case, K. Belfon, I. Y. Ben-Shalom, S. R. Brozell, D. S. Cerutti, T. E. Cheatham III, V. W. D. Cruzeiro, T. A. Darden, R. E. Duke, G. Giambasu, M. K. Gilson, H. Gohlke, A. W. Goetz, R. Harris, S. Izadi, S. A. Izmailov, K. Kasavajhala, K. Kovalenko, R. Krasny, T. Kurtzman, T. Lee, S. Le-Grand, P. Li, C. Lin, J. Liu, T. Luchko, R. Luo, V. Man, K. Merz, Y. Miao, O. Mikhailovskii, G. Monard,, H. Nguyen, A. Onufriev, F. Pan, S. Pantano, R. Qi, D. R. Roe, A. Roitberg, C. Sagui, S. Schott-Verdugo, J. Shen, C. L. Simmerling, N. Skrynnikov, J. Smith, J. Swails, R. C. Walker, J. Wang, R. M. Wilson, R. M. Wolf, X. Wu, Y. Xiong, Y. Xue, D. M. York, and P. A. Kollman, AMBER 20, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 2020.

     Not in our library

142. 142.

     T. Komiya, G. Brandl, T. Shimizukawa, J. L. Andersen, A. Turner, S. Finucane, R. Lehmann, T. Kampik, J. Magin, J. Dufresne, J. Waltman, J. L. C. Rodríguez, A. Ronacher, M. Geier, D. Shachnev, R. Ruana, P. Virtanen, F. Freitag, L. Maddox, M. Liška, H. Xu, E. Wieser, J. Maitin-Shepard, N. Kaneko, and cocoatomo, sphinx-doc/sphinx: v7.0.0, 2023.

     Not in our library

143. 143.

     D. van Heesch, Doxygen: Source Code Documentation Generator Tool, 2022.

     Not in our library

144. 144.

     Conda-Forge Community, The Conda-Forge Project: Community-Based Software Distribution Built on the Conda Package Format and Ecosystem, 2015.

     Not in our library

145. 145.

     F. Pezoa, J. L. Reutter, F. Suarez, M. Ugarte, and D. Vrgoč, “Foundations of JSON schema,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2016 ), pp. 263–273.

     Not in our library

146. 146.

     O. Ben-Kiki, C. Evans, and I. döt Net, “YAML Ain’t Markup Language (YAMLTM) version 1.2, 2009.

     Not in our library

147. 147.

     Q. Koziol and D. Robinson, HDF5, 2018.

     Not in our library

148. 148.

     A. H. Larsen, J. J. Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Dułak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Hammer, C. Hargus, E. D. Hermes, P. C. Jennings, P. B. Jensen, J. Kermode, J. R. Kitchin, E. L. Kolsbjerg, J. Kubal, K. Kaasbjerg, S. Lysgaard, J. B. Maronsson, T. Maxson, T. Olsen, L. Pastewka, A. Peterson, C. Rostgaard, J. Schiøtz, O. Schütt, M. Strange, K. S. Thygesen, T. Vegge, L. Vilhelmsen, M. Walter, Z. Zeng, and K. W. Jacobsen, “The atomic simulation environment—A python library for working with atoms,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017 ).

     Not in our library10.1088/1361-648x/aa680e

149. 149.

     W. Laosi, H. Gao, Y. Han, C. Ding, P. Shuning, Y. Wang, J. Qiuhan, H.-T. Wang, D. Xing, and J. Sun, “MAGUS: Machine learning and graph theory assisted universal structure searcher,” Natl. Sci. Rev. 10, nwad128 (2023 ).

     Not in our library10.1093/nsr/nwad128

150. 150.

     S. Plimpton, “Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics,” J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995 ).

     Not in our library10.1006/jcph.1995.1039

151. 151.

     V. Kapil, M. Rossi, O. Marsalek, R. Petraglia, Y. Litman, T. Spura, B. Cheng, A. Cuzzocrea, R. H. Meißner, D. M. Wilkins, B. A. Helfrecht, P. Juda, S. P. Bienvenue, W. Fang, J. Kessler, I. Poltavsky, S. Vandenbrande, J. Wieme, C. Corminboeuf, T. D. Kühne, D. E. Manolopoulos, T. E. Markland, J. O. Richardson, A. Tkatchenko, G. A. Tribello, V. V. Speybroeck, and M. Ceriotti, “i-PI 2.0: A universal force engine for advanced molecular simulations,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 236, 214–223 (2019 ).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2018.09.020

152. 152.

     M. J. Abraham, T. Murtola, R. Schulz, S. Páll, J. C. Smith, B. Hess, and E. Lindahl, “GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers,” SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015 ).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001

153. 153.
     OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics · 2017

     No notice
154. 154.

     Y. Ding and J. Huang (2023 ). “Implementation and validation of an openmm plugin for the deep potential representation of potential energy,” https://github.com/JingHuangLab/openmm_deepmd_plugin.

     Not in our library10.3390/ijms25031448

155. 155.

     P. Li, X. Liu, M. Chen, P. Lin, X. Ren, L. Lin, C. Yang, and L. He, “Large-scale ab initio simulations based on systematically improvable atomic basis,” Comput. Mater. Sci. 112, 503–517 (2016 ).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.004

156. 156.

     P. M. Piaggi, J. Weis, A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, P. G. Debenedetti, and R. Car, “Homogeneous ice nucleation in an ab initio machine-learning model of water,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2207294119 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2207294119

157. 157.

     S. K. Achar, J. J. Wardzala, L. Bernasconi, L. Zhang, and J. K. Johnson, “Combined deep learning and classical potential approach for modeling diffusion in UiO-66,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 3593–3606 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00010

158. 158.

     P. P. Ewald, “Die berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer gitterpotentiale,” Ann. Phys. 369, 253–287 (1921 ).

     Not in our library10.1002/andp.19213690304

159. 159.

     T. A. Barnes, E. Marin-Rimoldi, S. Ellis, and T. D. Crawford, “The MolSSI driver interface project: A framework for standardized, on-the-fly interoperability between computational molecular sciences codes,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 261, 107688 (2021 ).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107688

160. 160.

     H.-C. Tsai, T.-S. Lee, A. Ganguly, T. J. Giese, M. C. Ebert, P. Labute, K. M. Merz, Jr., and D. M. York, “AMBER free energy tools: A new framework for the design of optimized alchemical transformation pathways,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 640–658 (2023 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00725

161. 161.

     T.-S. Lee, H.-C. Tsai, A. Ganguly, and D. M. York, “ACES: Optimized alchemically enhanced sampling,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 472–487 (2023 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00697

162. 162.

     A. Ganguly, H.-C. Tsai, M. Fernández-Pendás, T.-S. Lee, T. J. Giese, and D. M. York, “AMBER drug discovery boost tools: Automated workflow for production free-energy simulation setup and analysis (ProFESSA),” J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 6069–6083 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00879

163. 163.

     T. J. Giese and D. M. York, “Development of a robust indirect approach for MM → QM free energy calculations that combines force-matched reference potential and Bennett’s acceptance ratio methods,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 5543–5562 (2019 ).

     Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00401

164. 164.

     Y. Chen, L. Zhang, H. Wang, and W. E, “DeePKS-kit: A package for developing machine learning-based chemically accurate energy and density functional models,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 282, 108520 (2023 ).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108520

165. 165.

     X. Wang, J. Li, L. Yang, F. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Chang, J. Chen, L. Zhang, and K. Yu, “DMFF: An open-source automatic differentiable platform for molecular force field development and molecular dynamics simulation,” Physical Chemistry (published online, 2022 ).

     Not in our library10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-2c7gv

166. 166.

     H. Li, Z. Wang, N. Zou, M. Ye, R. Xu, X. Gong, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, “Deep-learning density functional theory Hamiltonian for efficient ab initio electronic-structure calculation,” Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 367–377 (2022 ).

     Not in our library10.1038/s43588-022-00265-6

167. 167.

     R. Mao, M. Lin, Y. Zhang, T. Zhang, Z.-Q. J. Xu, and Z. X. Chen, “DeepFlame: A deep learning empowered open-source platform for reacting flow simulations,” Computer Physics Communications (to be published).

     Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108842

168. 168.
     3Dmol.js: molecular visualization with WebGL · 2014

     No notice
169. 169.

     E. You, Vue.js—The Progressive JavaScript Framework, 2023.

     Not in our library

170. 170.

     L. Zhang, D.-Y. Lin, H. Wang, R. Car, and W. E, “Active learning of uniformly accurate interatomic potentials for materials simulation,” Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 023804 (2019 ).

     Not in our library10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.023804

171. 171.

     W. Jiang, D. Zhang, S. Yao, L. Zhang, H. Wang, and F. Dai, “Hybrid Monte Carlo-molecular dynamics simulation of order-disorder transition in refractory high entropy alloys using deep potential model reliable in the full concentration space” (unpublished) (2023 ).

     Not in our library

172. 172.

     C. Adamo and V. Barone, “Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model,” J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158–6170 (1999 ).

     Not in our library10.1063/1.478522

173. 173.

     P. E. Blöchl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994 ).

     Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.50.17953

174. 174.

     J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996 ).

     Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865

175. 175.

     N. Mardirossian and M. Head-Gordon, “ωB97M-V: A combinatorially optimized, range-separated hybrid, meta-GGA density functional with VV10 nonlocal correlation,” J. Chem. Phys. 144, 214110 (2016 ).

     Not in our library10.1063/1.4952647

176. 176.

     A. Najibi and L. Goerigk, “DFT-D4 counterparts of leading meta-generalized-gradient approximation and hybrid density functionals for energetics and geometries,” J. Comput. Chem. 41, 2562–2572 (2020 ).

     Not in our library10.1002/jcc.26411

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.