Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Les limites des discussions internationales sur la libéralisation de l’agriculture: les oublis du débat et les « oubliés de l’Histoire »

Losch Bruno

Oléagineux, Corps gras, Lipides · 2006

doi:10.1051/ocl.2006.0038 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

40% of the world population is concerned with the questions related to the liberalization of agriculture. In spite of this outstanding importance, the current intense international debate on liberalization is biased by five major problems: the overestimation of price effects; the underestimation of structure effects; the minimization of confrontation effects between different types of agriculture; the carelessness about questions related to economic transition and finally; the lack of historical perspective. These biases prevent to pay attention to the existing risks of transition dead-ends for many developing countries, particularly the least developed countries and many of the low income countries where agriculture is still a strategic economic sector. The concrete answers that will be given to this transition challenge will impact the future of the world’s geopolitics.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.