Are zygomatic implants a simple and reliable technique for the stabilization of obturator prostheses? Case report and review of the literature
Sender Benjamin, Lacroix Thibault, Jaby Philippe and 1 more
Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery · 2020
doi:10.1051/mbcb/2020002 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Zygomatic implants have been used for several years for the treatment of extremely resorbed maxilla. Indications were extended for oral rehabilitations after maxillectomy in oncologic patients. A 24-year old patient with a triple A syndrome who underwent a left maxillectomy due to a spinocellular tumour was addressed for prosthetic rehabilitation. As his obturator prosthesis failed, surgical closure of the defect combined with 2 zygomatic implants to support the prosthesis was proposed. Despite a small persistent oro-antral fistula, the new obturator prosthesis restored the patient's functions and esthetics and improved his quality of life. The literature reports less than 40 cases of maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with zygomatic implants (with or without flap closure of the defect). Regardless of implant placement, there is no significant difference between reconstructive surgery and obturator prosthesis. Thus, zygomatic implants seem to be a reliable method for the stabilization of obturator prosthesis, without complex surgical procedure. Nonetheless, reservations should be expressed given the lack of data in terms of long-term follow up.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.