Advance Stripper Configuration for Energy-Saving Designs Using Standard Monoethanolamine Absorbent for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture
Liu Jiain, Chen Ding-Sou
MATEC Web of Conferences · 2021
doi:10.1051/matecconf/202133316002 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
In a standard post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) process, the regeneration energy of the CO2 lean solvent dominates the overall energy consumption. The energy reduction achieved by stripper modifications, such as the cold-split bypass, interheated stripper, and integration of both configurations, have been reported in the literature. In the cold-split bypass, the cold rich stream is split to recover the energy contained in the overhead vapor that was directly fed into the condenser in the traditional stripper configuration. The interheated stripper draws the semi-rich solvent from the middle of the stripper and exchanges heat with the hightemperature lean solvent from the reboiler; thereby, the overall column temperature can be raised that favors CO2 desorption along the column. Therefore, the literature reported that the integrated modification, combining the cold-split bypass with the interheated stripper, takes both advantages of above modifications that can further reduce the energy requirement. However, the present work shows that energy-saving effect of integrated process is not as promising as the literature claimed. Once the feed stage of the warm-rich solvent is determined properly, the cold-split process can achieve the similar energy-saving performance as that achieved by the integrated process.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.