Complexity and accuracy analysis of common artificial neural networks on pedestrian detection
Wu Jiatu
MATEC Web of Conferences · 2018
doi:10.1051/matecconf/201823201003 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
With the development of computer version, deep learning and artificial neural networks approaches like SPP-net, Faster-RCNN and YOLO are proposed. This paper compares them in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. By analyzing the network architecture, SPP-net is more complex than Faster-RCNN and YOLO. By analyzing the experiments, SPP-net and Faster-RCNN are more accurate than YOLO in static detection while opposite in real-time system. Therefore, in real-time pedestrian detection situation, YOLO can perform better. In static pedestrian detection situation, Faster-RCNN or SPP-net can perform better.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References7
7 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.