A method for evaluating the accuracy of curved surface flattening

Based on the analysis of the existing methods for estimating the surface flattening error, they can be roughly classified into two types of estimation methods: the relative area error analysis method and the relative length error analysis method. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods are summarized in the paper. Combining the general surface flattening methods and sheet metal stamping forming process, a more reasonable, scientific and comprehensive evaluation system for the accuracy of surface flattening is proposed. In line with the unfolding characteristics of the grid surface, the relative average area error of triangles is used instead of the traditional area error estimation method. The accumulated length error is replaced by the relative length error of each triangle in the estimation method, and the value of the change in the orientation (direction, position) relationship between the triangles is increased to assess the deformation error of the surface flattening method. The mass attributes of the patch are introduced. The minimum displacement energy method is used to supplement the evaluation of surface flattening accuracy. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation system is established and proposed, which takes into account the accuracy of local and global surface flattening.

Abstract licence: CC BY

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.