Design science masterplan in improving online investing decision support services

Online services supporting consumer investing have proliferated during the last three decades. Empirical research has discovered that overperforming investors started to underperform after switching to online investing services. Recent studies have revealed that individuals ignore the decision support provided by incumbent investing platforms, relying on their instincts instead. In response, a research project was launched, with the main goal to define technology, acceptance and service ecosystem originated reasons for not meeting investor expectations. A 'design science master plan' process was developed to identify and filter critical developments from a large number of suggested improvements. The ultimate goal was to enable a self-directed investor to manage investing assets with a performance of a professional, but with better control than delegated or fully automated investing services allow. A sample of live online investing platforms was used for problem discovery. In remote-controlled experiments, ten investors representing five investor personas evaluated the selected services. Identified problems and opportunities were analysed and conceptualised, after which design evaluations were made. Participants prioritised the defined development initiatives in terms of relevance and expected personal acceptance. A suggestion for more modular and specialised service architecture was made.

Abstract licence: CC BY

32 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.