EVALUATION OF CRITICAL EXPERIMENTS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN NUCLEAR REACTOR (UWNR) WITH UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
Park Young-Hui, Cheng Ye, Elzohery Rabab and 3 more
EPJ Web of Conferences · 2021
doi:10.1051/epjconf/202124710032 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
An improved computational model of the University of Wisconsin Nuclear Reactor (UWNR) was developed to support the benchmark evaluation of recent data acquired during an experimental campaign conducted at UWNR. Previous efforts led to a scripted UWNR model for automated generation of MCNP6 and Serpent inputs. This capability was extended to SCALE/KENO. All three tools were used to evaluate a variety of zero-power, fresh-critical configurations, and the results agreed well. The MCNP6 model was extended to support shuffling the core configuration, which allows the modeling of burnup for evaluation of depleted critical configurations. The MCNP6 model successfully predicts core reactivity over time, after accounting for the initial reactivity bias. The inclusion of SCALE/KENO input generation enables sensitivity and uncertainty analyses using the TSUNAMI and Sampler modules of SCALE. A preliminary uncertainty analysis was performed with TSUNAMI for nuclear data uncertainties while direct perturbation calculations were performed using MCNP6 for geometry and material uncertainties, which helped to identify model parameters with the largest effect on the eigenvalue. A transient UWNR transport Model in Mammoth/Rattlesnake is under development to simulate the transient experiments. The existing MCNP6 and Serpent models are used to provide the CAD file for meshing and homogenized cross-sections. In conclusion, the evaluation of UWNR benchmark data provides increased confidence in various states of the UWNR computational model and will provide a unique model for use by other analysts.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.