Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Risk of overestimation of urinary cadmium concentrations: interference from molybdenum

Cañas A.I., Esteban M., Cutanda F. and 1 more

E3S Web of Conferences · 2013

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20130121003 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

We show here that the selection of analytical method is critical when measuring low levels of cadmium in human urine. Cadmium is today usually analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), which has a higher sensitivity than Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). ICP-MS cadmium measurements show interference from tin (114Sn) and molybdenum oxides, which can result in an overestimation of cadmium levels. The 114Sn interference is stable and can be mathematically corrected. Molybdenum concentrations in urine are variable and different from individual to individual. We have estimated the degree of error which molybdenum interference introduces in the measurement of cadmium in urine by conventional ICP-MS. 268 urine samples from mothers and their children were measured. Removal of the molybdenum oxide interference (DRC-ICP-MS method) reduced urinary cadmium concentrations significantly (47.8%). The urinary molybdenum concentration in children was higher than in their mothers, resulting in greater overestimation. Our results clearly show that the DRC method is essential for reliable measurements of urinary cadmium concentrations, particularly in children. Furthermore, care should be taken when comparing Human Biomonitoring data for cadmium in urine and attention should be paid to which analytical method has been used (e.g. AAS and ICP-Ms), and especially if the measurements have been corrected for molybdenum interference.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References10

    10 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.