Accelerating high-throughput virtual screening through molecular pool-based active learning

Abstract

Bayesian optimization can accelerate structure-based virtual screening campaigns by minimizing the total number of simulations performed while still identifying the vast majority of computational hits.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 67

1. 1.

   Yu W. and MacKerell A. D., in Antibiotics: Methods and Protocols, ed. P. Sass, Methods in Molecular Biology, Springer, New York, NY, 2017, pp. 85–106

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Macalino S. J. Y., Gosu V., Hong S., Choi S. Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2015;38:1686-1701.

   Not in our library10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5

3. 3.

   Li J., Fu A., Zhang L. An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking. Interdiscip. Sci.: Comput. Life Sci. 2019;11:320-328.

   Not in our library10.1007/s12539-019-00327-w

4. 4.

   Irwin J. J., Shoichet B. K. Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59(9):4103-4120.

   Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b02008

5. 5.

   Irwin J. J., Shoichet B. K. ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005;45(1):177-182.

   Not in our library10.1021/ci049714

6. 6.

   Sterling T., Irwin J. J. ZINC 15 - Ligand Discovery for Everyone. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015;55(11):2324-2337.

   Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00559

7. 7.

   REAL Database – Enamine, https://enamine.net/library-synthesis/real-compounds/real-database, accessed 09/15/2020

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Patel H., Ihlenfeldt W.-D., Judson P. N., Moroz Y. S., Pevzner Y., Peach M. L., Delannée V., Tarasova N. I., Nicklaus M. C. SAVI, in silico generation of billions of easily synthesizable compounds through expert-system type rules. Sci. Data. 2020;7(384).

   Not in our library10.1038/s41597-020-00727-4

9. 9.

   Knehans T., Klingler F.-M., Kraut H., Saller H., Herrmann A., Rippmann F., Eiblmaier J., Lemmen C. and Krier M., Merck AcceSSible InVentory (MASSIV): In silico synthesis guided by chemical transforms obtained through bootstrapping reaction databases, Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 2017

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Nicolaou C. A., Watson I. A., Hu H., Wang J. The Proximal Lilly Collection: Mapping, Exploring and Exploiting Feasible Chemical Space. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016;56(7):1253-1266.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00173

11. 11.

    Hu Q., Peng Z., Sutton S. C., Na J., Kostrowicki J., Yang B., Thacher T., Kong X., Mattaparti S., Zhou J. Z., Gonzalez J., Ramirez-Weinhouse M., Kuki A. Pfizer Global Virtual Library (PGVL): A Chemistry Design Tool Powered by Experimentally Validated Parallel Synthesis Information. ACS Comb. Sci. 2012;14(11):579-589.

    Not in our library10.1021/co300096q

12. 12.

    Clark D. E. Virtual Screening: Is Bigger Always Better? Or Can Small Be Beautiful? J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020;60(9):4120-4123.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00101

13. 13.

    Gorgulla C., Boeszoermenyi A., Wang Z.-F., Fischer P. D., Coote P. W., Padmanabha Das K. M., Malets Y. S., Radchenko D. S., Moroz Y. S., Scott D. A., Fackeldey K., Hoffmann M., Iavniuk I., Wagner G., Arthanari H. An open-source drug discovery platform enables ultra-large virtual screens. Nature. 2020;580:663-668.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2117-z

14. 14.

    Lyu J., Wang S., Balius T. E., Singh I., Levit A., Moroz Y. S., O'Meara M. J., Che T., Algaa E., Tolmachova K., Tolmachev A. A., Shoichet B. K., Roth B. L., Irwin J. J. Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes. Nature. 2019;566:224-229.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-0917-9

15. 15.

    Acharya A., Agarwal R., Baker M. B., Baudry J., Bhowmik D., Boehm S., Byler K. G., Chen S. Y., Coates L., Cooper C. J., Demerdash O., Daidone I., Eblen J. D., Ellingson S., Forli S., Glaser J., Gumbart J. C., Gunnels J., Hernandez O., Irle S., Kneller D. W., Kovalevsky A., Larkin J., Lawrence T. J., LeGrand S., Liu S.-H., Mitchell J.C., Park G., Parks J.M., Pavlova A., Petridis L., Poole D., Pouchard L., Ramanathan A., Rogers D. M., Santos-Martins D., Scheinberg A., Sedova A., Shen Y., Smith J. C., Smith M. D., Soto C., Tsaris A., Thavappiragasam M., Tillack A. F., Vermaas J. V., Vuong V. Q., Yin J., Yoo S., Zahran M., Zanetti-Polzi L. Supercomputer-Based Ensemble Docking Drug Discovery Pipeline with Application to Covid-19. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020;5832-5852.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01010

16. 16.

    McGann M., OpenEye Scientific, GigaDocking™ - Structure Based Virtual Screening of Over 1 Billion Molecules Webinar, 2019, https://www.eyesopen.com/webinars/giga-docking-structure-based-virtual-screening, accessed 09/01/2020

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Frazier P. I., A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization, arXiv:1807.02811 [cs, math, stat], 2018

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Balachandran P. V., Xue D., Theiler J., Hogden J., Lookman T. Adaptive Strategies for Materials Design using Uncertainties. Sci. Rep. 2016;6(19660).

    Not in our library10.1038/srep19660

19. 19.

    Gubaev K., Podryabinkin E. V., Hart G. L. W., Shapeev A. V. Accelerating high-throughput searches for new alloys with active learning of interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2019;156:148-156.

    Not in our library

20. 20.
    Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design · 2016

    No notice
21. 21.

    Montoya J. H., Winther K. T., Flores R. A., Bligaard T., Hummelshøj J. S., Aykol M. Autonomous intelligent agents for accelerated materials discovery. Chem. Sci. 2020;11(32):8517-8532.

    Not in our library10.1039/d0sc01101k

22. 22.

    Bilsland E., Sparkes A., Williams K., Moss H. J., de Clare M., Pir P., Rowland J., Aubrey W., Pateman R., Young M., Carrington M., King R. D., Oliver S. G. Yeast-based automated high-throughput screens to identify anti-parasitic lead compounds. Open Biol. 2013;3:120158.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsob.120158

23. 23.

    Czechtizky W., Dedio J., Desai B., Dixon K., Farrant E., Feng Q., Morgan T., Parry D. M., Ramjee M. K., Selway C. N., Schmidt T., Tarver G. J., Wright A. G. Integrated Synthesis and Testing of Substituted Xanthine Based DPP4 Inhibitors: Application to Drug Discovery. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013;4:768-772.

    Not in our library10.1021/ml400171b

24. 24.

    Williams K., Bilsland E., Sparkes A., Aubrey W., Young M., Soldatova L. N., De Grave K., Ramon J., de Clare M., Sirawaraporn W., Oliver S. G., King R. D. Cheaper faster drug development validated by the repositioning of drugs against neglected tropical diseases. J. R. Soc., Interface. 2015;12:20141289.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2014.1289

25. 25.

    Janet J. P., Ramesh S., Duan C., Kulik H. J. Accurate Multiobjective Design in a Space of Millions of Transition Metal Complexes with Neural-Network-Driven Efficient Global Optimization. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020;6(4):513-524.

    Not in our library10.1021/acscentsci.0c00026

26. 26.

    Ghanakota P., Bos P., Konze K., Staker J., Marques G., Marshall K., Leswing K., Abel R., Bhat S. Combining Cloud-Based Free Energy Calculations, Synthetically Aware Enumerations and Goal-Directed Generative Machine Learning for Rapid Large-Scale Chemical Exploration and Optimization. ChemRxiv. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00120

27. 27.

    Konze K. D., Bos P. H., Dahlgren M. K., Leswing K., Tubert-Brohman I., Bortolato A., Robbason B., Abel R., Bhat S. Reaction-Based Enumeration, Active Learning, and Free Energy Calculations To Rapidly Explore Synthetically Tractable Chemical Space and Optimize Potency of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019;59(9):3782-3793.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00367

28. 28.

    Svensson F., Norinder U., Bender A. Improving Screening Efficiency through Iterative Screening Using Docking and Conformal Prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2017;57(3):439-444.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00532

29. 29.

    Ahmed L., Georgiev V., Capuccini M., Toor S., Schaal W., Laure E., Spjuth O. Efficient iterative virtual screening with Apache Spark and conformal prediction. J. Cheminf. 2018;10(8).

    Not in our library10.1186/s13321-018-0265-z

30. 30.
    Deep Docking: A Deep Learning Platform for Augmentation of Structure Based Drug Discovery · 2020

    Not checked
31. 31.

    Pyzer-Knapp E. O., Using Bayesian Optimization to Accelerate Virtual Screening for the Discovery of Therapeutics Appropriate for Repurposing for COVID-19, arXiv:2005.07121 [cs, q-bio], 2020

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Hernández-Lobato J. M., Requeima J., Pyzer-Knapp E. O. and Aspuru-Guzik A., Parallel and Distributed Thompson Sampling for Large-scale Accelerated Exploration of Chemical Space, arXiv:1706.01825 [stat], 2017

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Gibbs M. and MacKay D. J. C., Efficient Implementation of Gaussian Processes, 1997

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    Yang Y., Yao K., Repasky M. P., Leswing K., Abel R., Shoichet B., Jerome S. Efficient Exploration of Chemical Space with Docking and Deep-Learning. ChemRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00810

35. 35.

    Kalliokoski T. Machine Learning Boosted Docking (HASTEN): An Open-Source Tool To Accelerate Structure-based Virtual Screening Campaigns. ChemRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1002/minf.202100089

36. 36.

    Martin L. State of the Art Iterative Docking with Logistic Regression and Morgan Fingerprints. ChemRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Naik M., Raichurkar A., Bandodkar B.S., Varun B.V., Bhat S., Kalkhambkar R., Murugan K., Menon R., Bhat J., Paul B., Iyer H., Hussein S., Tucker J.A., Vogtherr M., Embrey K.J., McMiken H., Prasad S., Gill A., Ugarkar B.G., Venkatraman J., Read J., Panda M. Structure Guided Lead Generation for M. tuberculosis Thymidylate Kinase (Mtb TMK): Discovery of 3-Cyanopyridone and 1,6-Naphthyridin-2-one as Potent Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58(2):753-766.

    Not in our library10.1021/jm5012947

38. 38.

    Trott O., Olson A. J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010;31(2):455-461.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21334

39. 39.

    Yang K., Swanson K., Jin W., Coley C., Eiden P., Gao H., Guzman-Perez A., Hopper T., Kelley B., Mathea M., Palmer A., Settels V., Jaakkola T., Jensen K., Barzilay R. Analyzing Learned Molecular Representations for Property Prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019;59(8):3370-3388.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00237

40. 40.

    Balius T., Lyu J., Shoichet B. K. and Irwin J.,J. AmpC.csv.gz, 2018, https://figshare.com/articles/AmpC_screen_table_csv_gz/7359626

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

• An artificial intelligence accelerated virtual screening platform for drug discovery · 2024
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.