Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

Ultrasmall Glutathione-Protected Gold Nanoclusters as Next Generation Radiotherapy Sensitizers with High Tumor Uptake and High Renal Clearance

Xiao-Dong Zhang, Zhentao Luo, Jie Chen and 11 more

Scientific Reports · 2015 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/srep08669

Abstract

Radiotherapy is often the most straightforward first line cancer treatment for solid tumors. While it is highly effective against tumors, there is also collateral damage to healthy proximal tissues especially with high doses. The use of radiosensitizers is an effective way to boost the killing efficacy of radiotherapy against the tumor while drastically limiting the received dose and reducing the possible damage to normal tissues. Here, we report the design and application of a good radiosensitizer by using ultrasmall Au 29–43 (SG) 27–37 nanoclusters (<2 nm) with a naturally-occurring peptide (e.g., glutathione or GSH) as the protecting shell. The GSH-coated Au 29–43 (SG) 27–37 nanoclusters can escape the RES absorption, leading to a good tumor uptake (~8.1% ID/g at 24 h post injection). As a result, the as-designed Au nanoclusters led to a strong enhancement for radiotherapy, as well as a negligible damage to normal tissues. After the treatment, the ultrasmall Au 29–43 (SG) 27–37 nanoclusters can be efficiently cleared by the kidney, thereby avoiding potential long-term side-effects caused by the accumulation of gold atoms in the body. Our data suggest that the ultrasmall peptide-protected Au nanoclusters are a promising radiosensitizer for cancer radiotherapy.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 58

  1. 1.

    Jemal A. et al. Global cancer statistics. CA-Cancer J. Clin. 61, 69–90 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.20107

  2. 2.

    Brown J. M. & Workman P. Partition Coefficient as a guide to the development of radiosensitizers which are less toxic than misonidazole. Radiat. Res. 82, 171–190 (1980 ).

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Wardman P. Chemical radiosensitizers for use in radiotherapy. Clin. Oncol. 19, 397–417 (2007 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clon.2007.03.010

  4. 4.

    Jain S. et al. Cell-specific radiosensitization by gold nanoparticles at megavoltage radiation energies. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 79, 531–539 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.044

  5. 5.

    Yasui H. et al. Radiosensitization of tumor cells through endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by PEGylated nanogel containing gold nanoparticles. Cancer lett. 347, 151–158 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2014.02.005

  6. 6.

    Kasid U. & Dritschilo A. RAF antisense oligonucleotide as a tumor radiosensitizer. Oncogene 22, 5876–5884 (2003 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1206700

  7. 7.

    Kvols L. K. Radiation Sensitizers: A selective review of molecules targeting DNA and non-DNA targets. J. Nucl. Med. 46, 187S–190S (2005 ).

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Heidelberger C. et al. Studies on fluorinated pyrimidines: II. effects on transplanted tumors. Cancer Res. 18, 305–317 (1958 ).

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Herskovic A. et al. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. New. Engl. J. Med. 326, 1593–1598 (1992 ).

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm199206113262403

  10. 10.

    Robson M. et al. Quality of life in women at risk for ovarian cancer who have undergone risk-reducing oophorectomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 89, 281–287 (2003 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00072-6

  11. 11.

    Aapro M. S., Martin C. & Hatty S. Gemcitabine-a safety review. Anti-Cancer Drugs 9, 191–202 (1998 ).

    Not in our library10.1097/00001813-199803000-00001

  12. 12.

    Legha S. S. & Dimery I. W. High-dose cisplatin administration without hypertonic saline: observation of disabling neurotoxicity. J. Clin. Oncol. 3, 1373–1378 (1985 ).

    Not in our library10.1200/jco.1985.3.10.1373

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Carozzi V. et al. Effect of the chronic combined administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel in a rat model of peripheral neurotoxicity. Eur. J. Cancer 45, 656–665 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.038

  15. 15.

    Ali H. & van Lier J. E. Metal complexes as photo- and radiosensitizers. Chem. Rev. 99, 2379–2450 (1999 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/cr980439y

  16. 16.

    Butterworth K. T., McMahon S. J., Currell F. J. & Prise K. M. Physical basis and biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization. Nanoscale 4, 4830–4838 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/c2nr31227a

  17. 17.

    Huang X., El-Sayed I. H., Qian W. & El-Sayed M. A. Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2115–2120 (2006 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/ja057254a

  18. 18.

    Hainfeld J. F., Slatkin D. N. & Smilowitz H. M. The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice. Phys. Med. Biol. 49, N309 (2004 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/n03

  19. 19.

    Chithrani D. B. et al. Gold nanoparticles as radiation sensitizers in cancer therapy. Radiat. Res. 173, 719–728 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1667/rr1984.1

  20. 20.

    Rahman W. N. et al. Enhancement of radiation effects by gold nanoparticles for superficial radiation therapy. Nanomed-Nanotechnol. 5, 136–142 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2009.01.014

  21. 21.

    Roa W. et al. Gold nanoparticle sensitize radiotherapy of prostate cancer cells by regulation of the cell cycle. Nanotechnology 20, 375101 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/0957-4484/20/37/375101

  22. 22.

    Hainfeld J. F., Dilmanian F. A., Slatkin D. N. & Smilowitz H. M. Radiotherapy enhancement with gold nanoparticles. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 60, 977–985 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1211/jpp.60.8.0005

  23. 23.

    Lechtman E. et al. Implications on clinical scenario of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization in regards to photon energy, nanoparticle size, concentration and location. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 4631 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/001

  24. 24.

    McMahon S. J. et al. Biological consequences of nanoscale energy deposition near irradiated heavy atom nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 1, 1–9 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/srep00018

  25. 25.

    McMahon S. J., Mendenhall M. H., Jain S. & Currell F. Radiotherapy in the presence of contrast agents: a general figure of merit and its application to gold nanoparticles. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 5635 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/005

  26. 26.

    Zhang G. et al. Influence of anchoring ligands and particle size on the colloidal stability and in vivo biodistribution of polyethylene glycol-coated gold nanoparticles in tumor-xenografted mice. Biomaterials 30, 1928–1936 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.038

  27. 27.

    von Maltzahn G. et al. Computationally guided photothermal tumor therapy using long-circulating gold nanorod antennas. Cancer Res. 69, 3892–3900 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4242

  28. 28.

    Huo S. et al. Superior penetration and retention behavior of 50 nm gold nanoparticles in tumors. Cancer Res. 73, 319–330 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2071

  29. 29.

    Huang X. et al. A reexamination of active and rassive tumor targeting by using rod-shaped gold nanocrystals and covalently conjugated peptide ligands. ACS Nano 4, 5887–5896 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/nn102055s

  30. 30.

    Chou L. Y. T. & Chan W. C. W. Fluorescence-tagged gold nanoparticles for rapidly characterizing the size-dependent biodistribution in tumor models. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 1, 714–721 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.201200084

  31. 31.

    Choi C. H. J., Alabi C. A., Webster P. & Davis M. E. Mechanism of active targeting in solid tumors with transferrin-containing gold nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1235–1240 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0914140107

  32. 32.

    Ma X. et al. Gold nanoparticles induce autophagosome accumulation through size-dependent nanoparticle uptake and lysosome impairment. ACS Nano 5, 8629–8639 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/nn202155y

  33. 33.

    Zhang X. D. et al. Ultrasmall Au10–12 (SG)10–12 nanomolecules for high tumor specificity and cancer radiotherapy. Adv. Mater. 26, 4565–4568 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201400866

  34. 34.

    Choi H. S. et al. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat. Biotech. 25, 1165–1170 (2007 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt1340

  35. 35.

    Setyawati M. et al. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials cause endothelial cell leakiness by disrupting the homophilic interaction of VE–cadherin. Nat. Commun. 4, 1673 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms2655

  36. 36.

    Tay C. Y. et al. Nanoparticles strengthen intracellular tension and retard cellular migration. Nano lett. 14, 83–88 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/nl4032549

  37. 37.

    Zhang X.-D. et al. Size-dependent radiosensitization of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles for cancer radiation therapy. Biomaterials 33, 6408–6419 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.047

  38. 38.

    Lundqvist M. et al. Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 23, 14265–14270 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0805135105

  39. 39.

    Luo Z., Zheng K. & Xie J. Engineering ultrasmall water-soluble gold and silver nanoclusters for biomedical applications. Chem. Commun. 50, 5143–5155 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/c3cc47512c

  40. 40.

    Luo Z. et al. From aggregation-induced emission of Au(I)–thiolate complexes to ultrabright Au(0)@Au(I)-thiolate core–shell nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16662–16670 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/ja306199p

All 58 references

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.