Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 31, 2026.

Trends in cancer of the cervix uteri in Sweden following cytological screening

R Bergström, P Sparén, H-O Adami

British Journal of Cancer · 1999

doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690666

Abstract

Trends in cervical cancer incidence following the introduction of screening have mostly been studied using cross-sectional data and not analysed separately for squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinomas. Using Swedish nationwide data on incidence and mortality, we analysed trends during more than 3 decades and fitted Poisson-based age-period-cohort models, and also investigated whether screening has reduced the incidence of adenocarcinomas of the cervix. The incidence of reported cancer in situ increased rapidly during 1958-1967. Incidence rates of squamous cell cancer, fairly stable before 1968, decreased thereafter by 4-6% yearly in women aged 40-64, with a much smaller magnitude in younger and older women. An age-cohort model indicated a stable 70-75% reduction in incidence for women born 1940 and later compared with those born around 1923. The incidence of adenocarcinomas doubled during the 35-year study period. The mortality rate increased by 3.6% before 1968 and decreased by 4.0% yearly thereafter. Although a combination of organized and opportunistic screening can reduce the incidence of squamous cell cancer substantially, the incidence of adenocarcinomas appears uninfluenced by screening.

References 37

  1. 1.

    Adami H. O., Bergström R., Sparén P., Baron J. Increasing cancer risk in younger birth cohorts in Sweden. Lancet. 1993;341(8848):773-777.

    Not in our library10.1016/0140-6736(93)90557-w

  2. 2.

    Anderson G. H., Boyes D. A., Benedet J. L., Le Riche J. C., Matisic J. P., Suen K. C., Worth A. J., Millner A., Bennett O. M. Organisation and results of the cervical cytology screening programme in British Columbia, 1955-85. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296(6627):975-978.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.296.6627.975

  3. 3.

    Armstrong B., Holman D. Increasing mortality from cancer of the cervix in young Australian women. Med J Aust. 1981;1(9):460-462.

    Not in our library10.5694/j.1326-5377.1981.tb135734.x

  4. 4.

    Beral V. Cancer of the cervix: a sexually transmitted infection? Lancet. 1974;1(7865):1037-1040.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90432-2

  5. 5.

    Bjørge T., Thoresen S. O., Skare G. B. Incidence, survival and mortality in cervical cancer in Norway, 1956-1990. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(16):2291-2297.

    Not in our library10.1016/0959-8049(93)90224-4

  6. 6.

    Bourne R. G., Grove W. D. Invasive carcinoma of the cervix in Queensland. Change in incidence and mortality, 1959-1980. Med J Aust. 1983;1(4):156-158.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Brinton L. A., Fraumeni J. F. Epidemiology of uterine cervical cancer. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(12):1051-1065.

    Not in our library10.1016/0021-9681(86)90139-6

  8. 8.

    Clayton D., Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. I: Age-period and age-cohort models. Stat Med. 1987;6(4):449-467.

    Not in our library10.1002/sim.4780060405

  9. 9.

    Clayton D., Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age-period-cohort models. Stat Med. 1987;6(4):469-481.

    Not in our library10.1002/sim.4780060406

  10. 10.

    Devesa S. S., Blot W. J., Stone B. J., Miller B. A., Tarone R. E., Fraumeni J. F. Recent cancer trends in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(3):175-182.

    Not in our library10.1093/jnci/87.3.175

  11. 11.

    Devesa S. S., Young J. L., Brinton L. A., Fraumeni J. F. Recent trends in cervix uteri cancer. Cancer. 1989;64(10):2184-2190.

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-0142(19891115)64:10<2184::aid-cncr2820641034>3.0.co;2-8

  12. 12.

    Gustafsson L., Pontén J., Zack M., Adami H. O. International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8(5):755-763.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1018435522475

  13. 13.

    Gustafsson L., Sparén P., Gustafsson M., Pettersson B., Wilander E., Bergström R., Adami H. O. Low efficiency of cytologic screening for cancer in situ of the cervix in older women. Int J Cancer. 1995;63(6):804-809.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.2910630610

  14. 14.

    Gustafsson L., Sparén P., Gustafsson M., Wilander E., Bergström R., Adami H. O. Efficiency of organised and opportunistic cytological screening for cancer in situ of the cervix. Br J Cancer. 1995;72(2):498-505.

    Not in our library10.1038/bjc.1995.362

  15. 15.

    Hakama M., Louhivuori K. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked. Cancer Surv. 1988;7(3):403-416.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Holford T. R. Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:425-457.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.002233

  17. 17.

    Hopkins M. P., Morley G. W. A comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(6):912-917.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Kjaer S. K., Brinton L. A. Adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix: the epidemiology of an increasing problem. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):486-498.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036131

  19. 19.

    Levi F., La Vecchia C., Randriamiharisoa A., Boyle P. Cancer mortality in young adults in Switzerland, 1951-1989. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1991;117(5):497-501.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01612774

  20. 20.

    Levi F., La Vecchia C., Te V. C., Gutzwiller F. Incidence of invasive cervical cancer in the Swiss canton of Vaud, and a note on screening. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989;43(2):121-124.

    Not in our library10.1136/jech.43.2.121

  21. 21.

    Macgregor J. E., Campbell M. K., Mann E. M., Swanson K. Y. Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in north east Scotland shows fall in incidence and mortality from invasive cancer with concomitant rise in preinvasive disease. BMJ. 1994;308(6941):1407-1411.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.308.6941.1407

  22. 22.

    Mattsson B., Wallgren A. Completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register. Non-notified cancer cases recorded on death certificates in 1978. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1984;23(5):305-313.

    Not in our library10.3109/02841868409136026

  23. 23.

    Miller B. E., Flax S. D., Arheart K., Photopulos G. The presentation of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 1993;72(4):1281-1285.

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-0142(19930815)72:4<1281::aid-cncr2820720421>3.0.co;2-p

  24. 24.

    Milsom I., Friberg L. G. Primary adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A clinical study. Cancer. 1983;52(5):942-947.

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-0142(19830901)52:5<942::aid-cncr2820520534>3.0.co;2-r

  25. 25.

    Mitchell H., Medley G., Gordon I., Giles G. Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: no strong evidence of benefit. Br J Cancer. 1995;71(4):894-897.

    Not in our library10.1038/bjc.1995.172

  26. 26.

    Pengsaa P., Pesi M., Udomthavornsuk B., Tungvorapongchai V., Vatanasapt W., Shibata Y. Survival analysis of cervical cancer patients at Srinagarind Hospital 1976-1987. J Med Assoc Thai. 1989;72(6):346-350.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Pettersson F., Björkholm E., Näslund I. Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14(4):521-527.

    Not in our library10.1093/ije/14.4.521

  28. 28.

    Pisani P., Parkin D. M., Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from eighteen major cancers in 1985. Implications for prevention and projections of future burden. Int J Cancer. 1993;55(6):891-903.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.2910550604

  29. 29.

    Pisani P., Parkin D. M., Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from eighteen major cancers in 1985. Implications for prevention and projections of future burden. Int J Cancer. 1993;55(6):891-903.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.2910550604

  30. 30.

    Quinn M., Babb P., Jones J., Allen E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ. 1999;318(7188):904-908.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904

  31. 31.

    Sasieni P., Adams J. Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model. BMJ. 1999;318(7193):1244-1245.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1244

  32. 32.

    Sasieni P., Cuzick J., Farmery E. Accelerated decline in cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales. Lancet. 1995;346(8989):1566-1567.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92099-4

  33. 33.

    Sigurdsson K. Effect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer. Evaluation of screening activity in Iceland, 1964-1991. Int J Cancer. 1993;54(4):563-570.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.2910540408

  34. 34.

    Silcocks P. B., Thornton-Jones H., Murphy M. Squamous and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a comparison using routine data. Br J Cancer. 1987;55(3):321-325.

    Not in our library10.1038/bjc.1987.63

  35. 35.

    Villard L., Murphy M., Vessey M. P. Cervical cancer deaths in young women. Lancet. 1989;1(8634):377-377.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91743-1

  36. 36.

    Weiss L. K., Kau T. Y., Sparks B. T., Swanson G. M. Trends in cervical cancer incidence among young black and white women in metropolitan Detroit. Cancer. 1994;73(7):1849-1854.

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-0142(19940401)73:7<1849::aid-cncr2820730712>3.0.co;2-s

  37. 37.

    Zheng T., Holford T. R., Ma Z., Chen Y., Liu W., Ward B. A., Boyle P. The continuing increase in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a birth cohort phenomenon. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(2):252-258.

    Not in our library10.1093/ije/25.2.252

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.