No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.
Targeting HSP90 for cancer therapy
D Mahalingam, R Swords, J S Carew and 3 more
British Journal of Cancer · 2009 · Review
Abstract
Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) are molecular chaperones that regulate protein folding to ensure correct conformation and translocation and to avoid protein aggregation. Heat-shock proteins are increased in many solid tumours and haematological malignancies. Many oncogenic proteins responsible for the transformation of cells to cancerous forms are client proteins of HSP90. Targeting HSP90 with chemical inhibitors would degrade these oncogenic proteins, and thus serve as useful anticancer agents. This review provides an overview of the HSP chaperone machinery and the structure and function of HSP90. We also highlight the key oncogenic proteins that are regulated by HSP90 and describe how inhibition of HSP90 could alter the activity of multiple signalling proteins, receptors and transcriptional factors implicated in carcinogenesis.
Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) are a highly conserved family of molecular chaperones, some of which are induced by sublethal cellular stresses, including temperature elevation, hypoxia and oxidative damage. The transcription of inducible HSPs is regulated by heat-shock factors (HSFs) in particular HSF1. Once present in the cell, induced HSPs provide a transient protection from subsequent, potentially lethal stress. Heat-shock proteins regulate protein folding to ensure correct conformation and translocation and to avoid aggregate formation.
Heat-shock proteins are found at increased levels in many solid tumours and haematological malignancies. Their expression may in part account for the ability of malignant cells to maintain protein homoeostasis even in the hostile hypoxic and acidotic microenvironment of the tumour. Likewise, HSPs allow tumour cells to tolerate genetic alterations that would otherwise be fatal. Therefore, targeting of HSPs with chemical inhibitors may disrupt multiple oncogenic processes. There has thus been increased interest in the development of small molecule inhibitors that target individual HSPs to alter their function and cause the proteasomal degradation of their oncogenic ‘client’ proteins.
The heat-shock response (HSR)
Chaperone proteins ensure protein homoeostasis in the presence and absence of cellular stress. In the event of protein damage, molecular chaperones facilitate protein refolding or, if the damage is irreversible, target the protein for degradation. Chaperones also participate in the post-translational modification of signalling molecules, the assembly and disassembly of transcriptional complexes and the modulation of immunogenic proteins.
Molecular chaperones belong to a group of highly conserved proteins called HSPs, which are classified into families according to molecular size including, HSP100, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60 and small HSP (15–30 kDa). Although the high molecular weight HSPs are adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent, the small HSPs act in an ATP-independent manner. Heat-shock proteins act in concert with co-chaperones and adaptor molecules to form large multiprotein complexes.
The rapid induction of HSPs in response to stress is a result of a coordinated series of genetic and biochemical events referred to as the HSR. The HSR is mediated by HSFs. Of the three human HSFs, HSF1, 2 and 4, HSF1 is most crucial to the HSR. In response to stress, HSF1 is activated by dissociation from its complex with HSP90 and HSP70. Heat-shock factor 1 binding to the heat-shock element drives the expression of responsive genes. The HSP mRNA lack introns and so are efficiently transcribed in the stressed environment without a requirement for ATP-dependent post-translational modification.
Many tumours show increased levels of HSPs. Heat-shock proteins promote tumour cell survival, growth and metastasis, even in growth factor-deprived conditions, by allowing continued protein translation and cellular proliferation. Heat-shock factor 1 knockout mice show reduced development of tumours, and HSF1 deficiency rendered cultured cells highly refractory to transformation initiated by mutated RAS or by platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B) overexpression. Similarly, HSF1 depletion decreased viability of multiple human cancer cell lines, but had no effect on normal cells, suggesting that HSF1 provides critical relief to the cellular stresses experienced by cancer cells. Evidence also suggest that HSF1 supports tumorigenesis not only by mediating the induction of HSPs, such as HSP90, but also by orchestrating a broad network of core cellular functions that include proliferation, survival, protein synthesis and energy metabolism. Therefore, non-oncogenes like HSF1, whose functions are critical to cancer cells but dispensable to normal cells, can particularly be attractive as cancer drug targets.
Although inhibitors of HSP90 and the proteasome disrupt chaperone machinery, they can also activate the HSR. This inadvertent induction of HSPs may attenuate the beneficial effects of HSP90 inhibitors. Studies have found that the expression of both the major constitutive heat-shock cognate 70 (HSC70) and inducible isoform (HSP72) are increased following HSP90 inhibition with depletion of both these isoforms using short interfering RNA (siRNA) before HSP90 inhibition enhances HSP90 inhibitor cytotoxicity. Translating these preclinical studies into early clinical trials, investigators have used the induction of HSP70 as a pharmacodynamic marker of HSP90 inhibition in both tumour tissue and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs; ). Whether induction of HSP70 following HSP90 inhibition attenuates the cytotoxic effects of HSP90 inhibitors remains to be determined as clinical trials mature.
As expected, studies combining inhibitors of both HSP90 and the proteasome result in the accumulation of ubiquitinated misfolded oncogenic proteins and a synergistic cytotoxicty. These findings have driven the design and implementation of clinical trials in multiple myeloma, where the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has already been approved for therapeutic use.
Heat-shock protein 90 structure and function
The HSP90 is a constitutively expressed cellular protein that compromises 1–2% of the total protein load. It is a flexible homodimer whose monomers consist of three domains, an N-terminal, ATP-binding domain, a middle (M), ATP-hydrolysis-regulating domain and a C-terminal or dimerisation domain. The C-terminus also regulates ATPase activity and recruits co-chaperones through a conserved EEVD motif. Co-chaperones, containing tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains, such as HOP and PPIase, and the non-TPR co-chaperones, CDC37, p23 and Aha1, play an important role in client protein maturation and modulation of ATPase activity. Co-chaperones also recruit specific client proteins to HSP90 and/or stabilise HSP90 in an ATP-bound state to prolong the half-life of the mature multichaperone complex. Adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis alters HSP90 structure and promotes its chaperone function.
Five HSP90 isoforms have been identified to date, including cytoplasmic HSP90α- and β-isoforms, endoplasmic reticulum localised glucose regulated protein 94 (GRP94), mitochondrial tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 (TRAP1) and membrane-associated HSP90N. All isoforms have a similar structure, except for HSP90N, which possesses a blunt N-terminus lacking an ATP-binding region. Figure 1 illustrates how HSPs regulate protein stability and maturation by formation of large multiprotein chaperone complexes.
Heat-shock protein 90 function can be further regulated by post-translational modifications, phosphorylation, nitrosylation and acetylation. Hyperacetylation of HSP90 occurs following histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) inhibition and is observed in HDAC6-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts and correlates with impaired HSP90 function. Hyperacetylation attenuates HSP90 chaperoning of client proteins BCR-ABL, AKT, RAF1 and hormone receptors, such as the glucocorticoid receptor results in cellular cytotoxicity. These findings may explain the synergy observed between HDAC inhibitors and oncoprotein kinase inhibitors used against specific HSP90 client proteins.
HSP90 and the development of cancer
Many oncogenic proteins are HSP90 client proteins. Table 1 depicts the list of client proteins discussed below, mechanism of actions of these proteins and potential tumours that HSP90 inhibitors could be applied to.
Prosurvival signalling molecules
Growth factors drive tumour cell proliferation through transmembrane-bound receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), which are frequently overexpressed and/or mutated in cancer cells. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an RTK, which can be activated in a ligand-dependent and -independent manner or when overexpressed. Recently, several somatic mutations in the EGFR gene have been linked with favourable response to treatment with anti-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), gefitinib and erlotinib, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Tumours with these mutations are also sensitive to HSP90 inhibitors despite developing resistance to TKIs. Tumour cells without EGFR mutations are equally resistance to both TKIs and HSP90 inhibitors emphasising the importance of patient selection when designing clinical trials. Once active, EGFR is phosphorylated to initiate a series of biochemical signalling events, which diverge to activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase AKT (PI3K-AKT) pathway, the Ras-Raf-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Ras-Raf-ERK) pathway and the stress-activated protein kinase pathway. These prosurvival pathways culminate in DNA synthesis, cell division and tumour cell proliferation.
The active PI3K-AKT pathway activates prosurvival transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB). AKT suppress proapoptotic proteins, for example, the Forkhead transcription factor family and Bad. Mutations in the AKT pathway, its constitutive activation or the loss of the tumour suppressor PTEN, will fuel tumour cell proliferation and prevent apoptosis. As a HSP90 client protein, AKT degradation following HSP90 inhibition would result in attenuation of its prosurvival effects.
The Ras-Raf-ERK pathway is similarly important in cell proliferation and survival. Mutations in N-Ras and/or B-Raf constitutively activate signalling. Mutated B-Raf is a known HSP90 client protein. Therefore, HSP90 inhibition disrupts the mutant B-Raf and reduces ERK signalling. Clinical responses have been observed in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma treated with the HSP90 inhibitor 17-AAG and were associated with B-Raf and N-Ras mutations, leading to a phase II trial of the HSP90 inhibitor tanespimycin in patients with malignant melanoma, on which clinical activity has also been observed.
ErbB2/HER-2 is another tyrosine kinase overexpressed in approximately 20–30% of breast and prostate cancers. The HER-2 protein stability is inherently dependent on HSP90. Heat-shock protein 90 inhibition decreased ErbB2 protein, phosphorylated HER-2 and downstream prosurvival signalling. Early clinical trials with tanespimycin in combination with the monoclonal HER-2 antibody, traztuzumab, showed modest clinical activity in 5 of 25 traztuzumab refractory patients with HER-2 overexpressing tumours. The maximum tolerated dose was not achieved and dose escalation was terminated at 450 mg m−2. Following from this, the phase II trial has reported encouraging response rates in patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer, who progressed within 3 months of adjuvant traztuzumab therapy. Interestingly, HSP70 induction, used as a pharmacodynamic marker of HSP90 inhibition, was observed in PBLs within 24 h of drug administration in the phase I trial. This again raises the question as to whether the induction of HSP70 limits the clinical benefits of HSP90 inhibition.
KIT, another RTK, undergoes gain-of-function mutation in >90% of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) leading to the activation of PI3K-AKT, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), STAT-1 and STAT-3 prosurvival pathways. Inhibition of KIT oncoprotein by imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) induces a clinical response in most GIST patients. However, many patients eventually develop resistance because of further KIT mutations. Salvage treatment with TKIs led to a median survival of only 15 months. It was subsequently shown that KIT activation depended on protein stabilisation by HSP90. Heat-shock protein 90 inhibition caused degradation of both wild-type and imatinib-resistant KIT mutants. Similarly, HSP90 inhibitors substantially reduced phosphorylated-KIT and total KIT expression with decreased cell survival observed in KIT-positive GIST. This led to a phase I trial of the HSP90 inhibitor IPI-504 in patients with refractory metastatic GIST who had progressed on TKI therapy. Although no response was seen based on RECIST criteria, FDG–PET responses based on the EORTC criteria were observed in 15 of the 18 patients. This raises the question of what parameters of clinical response should clinical investigators look for when designing clinical trials with HSP90 inhibitors.
Steroid hormone receptors
The oestrogen receptor-α (ERα) is an intracellular transcription factor that transduces a signal following binding of its ligand, oestradiol. Growing evidence suggests that ERα may be activated independent of oestradiol through the downstream signalling pathways of other activated growth factor receptors. Activated ERα plays a role in breast cancer by regulating genes involved in cellular proliferation. In the absence of oestradiol, ERα is found in the nucleus as part of a multiprotein complex containing HSP90 and other chaperones. Upon ligation, ERα dissociates from the complex and binds oestrogen response elements in the promoters of oestradiol-responsive genes; progesterone receptor, cathepsin D and HDAC6. Oestrogen receptor-α may also localise at the plasma membrane to activate EGFR and insulin-like growth factor receptor and signal downstream events.
Heat-shock protein 90 inhibitors target ERα for proteasomal degradation, and as such may be useful in the treatment of ER-positive breast cancers. In addition, HSP90 inhibitors may be beneficial in patients who develop resistance to hormone therapies, tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. These inhibitors prevent ligand-independent activation of ERα by preventing ERα phosphorylation and degrading AKT.
Chimeric fusion proteins
Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is characterised by the BCR-ABL fusion gene, which is a constitutively active cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase that activates numerous signal transduction pathways and contributes to leukaemogenesis. Imatinib mesylate targets the ATP-binding site of the kinase domain of ABL and prolongs survival in all phases of CML. However, patients can develop imatinib resistance associated with BCR-ABL gene amplification and/or kinase domain mutations, which abrogate imatinib-binding or function. Heat-shock protein 90 maintains BCR-ABL stability and function. Therefore, HSP90 inhibitors targets BCR-ABL for degradation and suppresses cell proliferation. Furthermore, HDAC inhibitors shown to effectively induce apoptosis in both imatinib-sensitive and -resistant BCR-ABL myeloid leukaemia cells can be used in combination with HSP90 inhibitors to synergistically induce apoptosis and inhibit cell growth.
Anaplastic large cell lymphomas are a subgroup of non-Hodgkins lymphoma, which are characterised by the expression of the chimeric protein, NPM-ALK. NPM-ALK originates from the fusion of nucleophosmin (NPM) and the membrane receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK; ). Similar to RTK, dimerisation is required for NPM-ALK activation, although, however, unlike RTKs, NPM-ALK dimers are constitutively active and do not require plasma membrane localisation. Active NPM-ALK possesses phospho-transferase activity and interacts with various ALK-adapter proteins to induce cell transformation and proliferation. Both HSP90 and HSP70 bind NPM-ALK. Heat-shock protein 90 inhibition causes NPM-ALK destabilisation and degradation and reduces ALK-adapter protein phosphorylation. Although HSP90 inhibition prevents HSP90/NPM-ALK interaction, it results in the rapid association of HSP70 with NPM-ALK and NPM-ALK targeting for proteasomal degradation.
Angiogeneic mediators
The transcription factor, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), exists as a heterodimer composed of a constitutively expressed β-subunit and an oxygen-sensing α-subunit. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α accumulates during hypoxia and dimerises with HIF-1β before translocating to the nucleus and binding hypoxia response elements on hypoxia-responsive genes. Genes regulated by HIF1-α are key players in cancer development and include many angiogenic mediators (nitric oxide synthase and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)), genes involved in cellular matrix metabolism (urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, matrix metalloproteinases-2 MMP2) and glycolysis (phosphoglycerate kinase-1 and lactate dehydrogenase; ). The hypoxic microenvironment of tumours means that HIF-1α is often overexpressed. In normoxia, HIF-1α is ubiquitinated and degraded. Similarly, HSP90 inhibitors promote HIF-1α degradation and are more cytotoxic in hypoxic conditions.
Apoptotic mediators
Apoptosis is a highly regulated cell death programme triggered by a diverse array of cellular stresses. Apoptotic signal transduction pathways converge to activate a conserved family of aspartic acid-specific cysteine proteases called caspases. Cells undergo apoptosis through one of the two major signalling pathways. The first, the intrinsic or mitochondrial pathway, is regulated by the Bcl-2 family proteins. Mitochondrial disturbance culminates in the release of cytochrome c, procaspases and other proapoptotic factors, and results in the formation of a caspase-activating complex called apoptosome. The extrinsic or death receptor-mediated pathway, is initiated by binding of an extracellular ligand (tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) or TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; TRAIL), formation of the death-inducing signalling complex and caspase activation.
Heat-shock proteins negatively regulate apoptosis. Heat-shock protein 90 promotes cell survival by activation of NF-κB. Tumour necrosis factor-α activation recruits and stabilises receptor-interacting protein (RIP) at the TNF receptor-1 to maintain NF-κB activity. Key signalling molecules, such as VEGF, induces antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 expression and stimulates HSP90 association with Bcl-2 and Apaf-1 to inhibit apoptosis. Therefore, HSP inhibitors may enhance apoptosis and circumvent resistance to anticancer treatments, such as TNFα and TRAIL.
Tumour suppressor genes
As a transcription factor, p53 is activated in response to DNA-damage-inducing stresses. Once active, p53 will induce cell cycle arrest or apoptosis through its regulation of p53-responsive genes (p21, p27, Bax, Puma, Noxa; ). Over 50% of human cancers possess mutated p53 and in particular are associated with the more aggressive or chemotherapeutic resistant tumours. Heat-shock protein 90 and HSP70 co-precipitate with mutant p53. Heat-shock protein binding to mutant p53 inhibits mouse double minute 2-induced ubiquitination and degradation of p53. Heat-shock protein 90 inhibitors disrupt these interactions and result in p53 degradation. Therefore, HSP90 inhibitors could ensure that DNA-damage-inducing agents are more effective in the eradication of tumours with mutated p53.
Cell cycle regulatory proteins
Cellular division is carefully monitored by cell cycle checkpoints, which are regulated by cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and CDK inhibitors. In addition, retinoblastoma (Rb) and the E2F transcription factor regulate the G1/S transition. Retinoblastoma phosphorylation is crucial to cell cycle progression. When unphosphorylated, Rb blocks cell proliferation by altering E2F function. When phosphorylated, Rb is inactive and so the cell cycle proceeds. CDK4 phosphorylates Rb and is a client protein of HSP90. Heat-shock protein 90 inhibition targets CDK4 for proteasomal degradation allowing Rb to remain unphosphorylated.
Telomeres are non-coding DNA regions found at the ends of chromosomes, which contain several thousand short tandem repeats. Following a replication cycle, the telomere on each chromosome will lose 50–100 bp. This progressive shortening of telomere length eventually effects chromosome stability and leads to cell death. In transformed cells, telomere shortening is prevented by the increased presence of telomerase, which consists of a catalytic protein component, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and a template-containing RNA. Heat-shock protein 90 inhibition perturbs telomerase assembly and hTERT enzymatic activity to reduce the proliferative capacity of tumours.
Mediators of tissue invasion and metastasis
Tumour invasion and metastasis require the upregulation of MMP2 and Met proto-oncogenes. The protein product of Met is the transmembrane tyrosine kinase p190Met, a receptor for hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) and client protein of HSP90. Binding of HGF/SF to p190Met increases cellular proliferation, migration, invasion and morphogenesis. Metastasis requires tumour cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, digestion of the matrix and migration of the tumour cells. These processes are regulated by HSP90 client protein, MMP2. Heat-shock protein 90 inhibitors downregulate p190Met expression, inhibit HGF/SF-mediated cell motility and impair MMP2 maturation.
Conclusion
It is clear that HSP90 play a crucial role in maintaining oncogenic protein homoeostasis. Heat-shock protein 90 inhibition offers great promise in the treatment of a wide variety of solid and haematological malignancies. Various HSP90 inhibitors have entered clinical trials and have been recently reviewed, but many crucial questions remain: Will newer synthetic HSP90 inhibitors be more potent in cancer cells than non-transformed cells? What current pharmacodynamic indicators could be used to ascertain the optimal dosing regime? Is the induction of HSP70 in PBL a sufficiently good marker of biological activity following HSP90 inhibition? And would the induction of HSP70 amongst other HSPs decrease HSP90 inhibitor efficacy?
Emphasis has also been placed on the therapeutic targeting of other key molecules in the multichaperone protein complexes. As HSF1 regulates the expression of a number of HSPs, there has been increased interest in the development of small molecule modulators that could alter HSF1 activity and as a consequence HSP expression. Natural-acting flavonoid, quercetin; the benzylidene lactam, KNK437; the diterpene triepoxide triptolide and the dehydroemetine derivative NZ28 and emunin have been used to target HSF1 activity, although the specificity and potency of these compounds are still questionable. Furthermore, decreasing the normal expression levels of HSPs by HSF1 inhibition raises concerns about toxicity to non-transformed cells.
In view of HSP70 induction observed with HSP90 inhibitor treatment, the potential therapeutic benefit of modulating HSP70 activity has become attractive. As yet, there are limited small molecules inhibitors of HSP70 available; however, it would be interesting to combine HSP90 and HSP70 inhibitors that would target HSP90 and both HSC70 and HSP72 isoforms to enhance tumour response to these agents.
Early clinical trials have highlighted toxicities ranging from constitutional symptoms such as fatigue to hepatic and gastrointestinal adverse events, which have all been well tolerated. However, the long-term effects of HSP90 inhibition needs to be evaluated further as clinical trials mature in view of the importance of HSP90 in cellular functions and maintaining genomic stability of non-transformed cells.
In designing future clinical trials, clinical investigators will need to incorporate appropriate radiological and pathological parameters to determine the response to HSP inhibitors. This would include the use of FDG-PET and DCE-MRI to document tumour activity and avoid misinterpreted tumour responses from a CT alone. Pathological information on mutational status of RTK and p53 mutations or expression levels of key signalling molecules, such as EGFR, HER-2 and HIF-1 expression, should also be obtained to select appropriate patient populations. These key signalling molecules may serve as predictive markers for HSP90 inhibitor therapy and its expression levels before and after therapy for both responders and non-responders should be documented using effective and reproducible molecular biology assays. This will help determine optimal biological dosing, preventing toxicity to normal cells and will improve efficacy of HSP90 inhibitors in various tumour types.
Novel combination therapies for each tumour type need to be developed based on preclinical data. Combinations of HSP90 inhibitors with conventional chemotherapy or targeted therapies, such as proteasomal inhibitors, HDACi, small molecule RTK inhibitors or TRAIL, may lead to greater efficacy and improved clinical outcomes.
References 62
- 1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 30.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 31.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 36.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 37.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 38.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 39.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 40.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 41.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 42.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 43.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 44.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 45.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 46.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 47.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 48.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 49.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 50.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 51.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 52.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 53.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 54.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 55.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 56.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 57.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 58.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 59.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 60.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 61.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 62.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 4
- Role of p53 in breast cancer progression: An insight into p53 targeted therapy · 2023No notice
- Biological Effects of Human Exposure to Environmental Cadmium · 2022No notice
- Fisetin and Quercetin: Promising Flavonoids with Chemopreventive Potential · 2019No notice
- Cellular Stress Responses: Cell Survival and Cell Death · 2010No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.