No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.
Macrophages promote angiogenesis in human breast tumour spheroids in vivo
L Bingle, C E Lewis, K P Corke and 2 more
British Journal of Cancer · 2005
Abstract
An in vivo model has been established to study the role of macrophages in the initiation of angiogenesis by human breast tumour spheroids in vivo. The extent of the angiogenic response induced by T47D spheroids implanted into the dorsal skinfold chamber in nude mice was measured in vivo and compared to that induced by spheroids infiltrated with human macrophages prior to implantation. Our results indicate that the presence of macrophages in spheroids resulted in at least a three-fold upregulation in the release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in vitro when compared with spheroids composed only of tumour cells. The angiogenic response measured around the spheroids, 3 days after in vivo implantation, was significantly greater in the spheroids infiltrated with macrophages. The number of vessels increased (macrophages vs no macrophages 34+/-1.9 vs 26+/-2.5, P<0.01), were shorter in length (macrophages vs no macrophages 116+/-4.92 vs 136+/-6.52, P<0.008) with an increased number of junctions (macrophages vs no macrophages 14+/-0.93 vs 11+/-1.25, P<0.025) all parameters indicative of new vessel formation. This is the first study to demonstrate a role for macrophages in the initiation of tumour angiogenesis in vivo.
Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Angiogenesis, the development of new blood vessels from an existing vascular network, is a prerequisite for tumour growth beyond 2 mm in diameter, as it ensures the adequate supply of oxygen and nutrients for tumour cell expansion and spread. Blood vessels grow rapidly in tumours, are usually disorganised, often incomplete, lacking in structural integrity and prone to collapse, resulting in areas of inadequate perfusion and transient hypoxia (low oxygen tension; ). Hypoxia has recently been shown to be an important stimulus for angiogenesis, promoting tumour and stromal cell secretion of such potent proangiogenic growth factors as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; ). VEGF then stimulates the rapid growth of new blood vessels into hypoxic tumour areas, which results in their subsequent reoxygenation.
Tumour associated macrophages (TAMs) are widespread in human breast carcinomas and it has been suggested that they may play an important role in the regulation of tumour angiogenesis. In vitro studies have shown that TAMs secrete growth factors that are mitogenic for both tumour cells and endothelial cells, in addition to stimulating the activity of a number of proteolytic enzymes in breast cancer. We and others have demonstrated that breast tumours containing increased numbers of macrophages are significantly more vascularised and have greater axillary lymph node involvement than tumours with low numbers of macrophages. This could explain, at least in part, the finding that high focal TAM infiltration in primary human breast tumours is associated with reduced relapse-free and overall survival.. A similar positive correlation between macrophage infiltration and angiogenesis has also been reported for ovarian tumours and B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Specific accumulation of macrophages expressing VEGF is seen in avascular, hypoxic areas of human breast tumours, whereas in highly vascularised, well-oxygenated areas of the same tumour, macrophages are present but VEGF is not expressed. This suggests that hypoxia stimulates VEGF release from macrophages in tumours, and is supported by the finding that macrophages release VEGF in response to hypoxia in vitro. Thus, once macrophages are located within the hypoxia/necrotic regions of the tumour, they may promote tumour progression by releasing VEGF and potentially other proangiogenic cytokines and enzymes, which stimulate tumour angiogenesis.
The mouse dorsal skinfold chamber model allows direct in situ visualisation and monitoring of implanted tumour spheroids and the surrounding blood vessels in vivo. Implantation of the chamber with human breast tumour cells or spheroids permits accurate, serial, noninvasive monitoring of tumour growth, and angiogenesis using in vivo microscopy, facilitating accurate spatial and temporal quantification. Using this model, the requirement of VEGF for tumour angiogenesis and maintenance of vessel integrity has been demonstrated. Inhibition of endogenous VEGF results in decreased microvessel density and microvascular regression in a similar model. Moreover studies, investigating the immediate events which follow the initiation of tumour angiogenesis, provide evidence that new functional vessels form when the tumour mass consists of only 100–300 tumour cells. Administration of ex-flk1 (a soluble, truncated VEGF receptor protein) resulted in partial inhibition of the early angiogenic and tumour growth activities suggesting that tumour growth is delayed prior to the onset of angiogenesis.
Despite the increasing body of evidence, both experimental and clinical, implicating macrophages in breast tumour angiogenesis, there have been no reports of in vivo studies to demonstrate unequivocally their proangiogenic activity in tumours. The current study was designed to determine the role of macrophages in the initiation of tumour angiogenesis, by isolating the tumour spheroid from host (murine) cells. Human breast tumour spheroids were infiltrated with human monocytes in vitro, coated with alginate and implanted into dorsal skinfold chambers on nude mice. The resultant angiogenesis surrounding the spheroids was quantified using image analysis, and compared with spheroids consisting of tumour cells alone.
Isolation of human monocytes
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from normal healthy volunteers with Local Ethics Committee approval, LREC 02/303. Blood was collected into sodium citrate (final volume 10%) tubes and after centrifugation serum was collected and CaCl2 added to make platelet rich plasma-derived serum (PRPDS). The blood cells were layered onto a Ficoll gradient (Amersham Biosciences) and after centrifugation the mononuclear cell layer collected. The cells were further purified using CD14 magnetic beads according to the manufacturers instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). Briefly, the cells were incubated with the labelled beads at 4°C for 20–30 min, washed in ice-cold PBS+0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA, and separated from unlabelled cells using a magnetic column.
Human breast tumour spheroids
96-well tissue culture plates (Corning) were coated with 100 μl of 1.5% high-gel point agarose per well. The human T47D breast tumour cell line was subcultured and 104 cells plated per well in 200 μl culture medium consisting of RPMI (Sigma), 10% foetal calf serum FCS, (Sigma), 100 U ml−1 penicillin (Gibco), 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin (Gibco) and 2 mM glutamine (Gibco). The plates were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 4 days, thereafter the culture medium was changed on alternate days by replacing 100 μl of medium with 100 μl fresh culture medium. Preliminary studies have established that between 20–24 days in culture the spheroids are approximately 600–800 μm in diameter and have a necrotic core (unpublished results).
Tumour spheroid coating
Preliminary studies were carried out to determine the optimum conditions for monocyte infiltration and alginate coating of the spheroids, including the assessment of VEGF and bFGF release from infiltrated and noninfiltrated spheroids. The spheroids were prepared for in vivo implantation using the following protocol. Spheroids were cultured for 14–18 days and human monocytes (105 spheroid−1 well−1) were added and allowed to infiltrate the spheroids for 24 h. In order to prevent autologous (i.e. murine) macrophages from infiltrating the spheroid following implantation in vivo, the spheroids were coated with alginate by immersion in a 1.25% solution of sodium alginate (Pronova, UK) and transfer to a 0.1 M CaCl2 solution, prepared from a 0.15 M NaCl stock solution, to initiate gel-formation by cross-linking. The alginate coated spheroids were washed three times with PBS and once in RPMI with 10% FCS. The coated spheroids were cultured for a further 5 days to allow differentiation of monocytes to macrophages. Control spheroids without monocytes were also coated with alginate and cultured in an identical manner. Monocytes alone do not form spheroids. In order to demonstrate the diffusion of macromolecules through the alginate, Hoescht 33258 (Molecular Probes) was added to the culture medium for 15 min at various timepoints up to 24 days, to allow assessment of spheroid viability and porosity over the in vivo time course. Spheroids were examined using a fluorescent microscope.
Assessment of monocyte infiltration into spheroids
T47D spheroids were established in culture and allowed to grow for 17 days before purified monocytes (105) were added to the culture in RPMI with 5% PRPDS, penicillin (100 U ml−1), streptomycin (100 mg ml−1) and glutamine (2 mM). The spheroids were collected on days 1, 4, and 7 after monocyte addition, formalin-fixed and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with anti-human CD68 (Dako, see below for immunohistochemistry details) a specific monocyte/macrophage marker, and the number of monocytes/macrophages in each spheroid section counted. For each time point at least five different spheroids and three sections from each spheroid were used to quantify the number of macrophages present.
VEGF and bFGF quantification
The release of VEGF and bFGF critical regulators of tumour angiogenesis, were determined from spheroids both in the presence and absence of human macrophages. Culture medium was collected at various time points, before and after the addition of monocytes (days 14–18) to spheroid cultures, before and after alginate coating (days 15–19) and immediately before spheroid implantation into the skinfold chamber model (days 21–24). At all times, control spheroids (no monocyte infiltration) were cultured in parallel and medium was collected simultaneously. Immediately after collection, the medium was centrifuged to remove cell debris and stored in aliquots at −20°C until assayed. The ELISAs were performed using commercially available kits (R&D Systems) and carried out according to the manufacturers protocol.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
Spheroids (with and without monocytes) were collected directly into buffered formalin, processed, paraffin–embedded, and cut into 5 μm sections. The sections were dewaxed in xylene and absolute alcohol before endogenous peroxide was blocked with hydrogen peroxide. Antigen retrieval was achieved by incubating in protease type XXIV (Sigma) at 37°C for 20 min. After incubation in normal serum, anti-CD68 (Dako) was diluted 1: 100 in PBS added to sections and incubated overnight at 4°C. A Vectastain kit (Vector Laboratories) was used for secondary antibody application and detection. Spheroids that had been implanted in the dorsal skinfold chamber were collected at the end of each experiment and fixed immediately in zinc chloride saline, processed and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections were cut as described previously, stained with haematoxylin and eosin and examined to determine the exact location of the spheroid. Appropriate other sections were stained for CD 68, (macrophages) Hypoxia inducible Factor-1α (HIF-1α, Abcam) and with anti-platelet cell adhesion molecule antibody (endothelial cells, anti-PECAM, CD-31, Abcam).
Animals and dorsal skinfold chamber model
Adult, male MF-1 nude mice (20–30 g, n=10) were obtained from the University of Sheffield Field Laboratories and were allowed food and water ad libitum. All procedures were performed in accordance with UK legislation under Home Office Project Licence PPL 40/2343.
The dorsal skinfold chamber manufactured from titanium (Medical Workshops, University of Sheffield) was implanted into the animal under hypnorm/diazepam anaesthesia (1: 1, 0.1 ml 100 g−1). The mice were placed on a heated pad, and a double layer of skin extended perpendicular to the dorsum. A circular area of skin and tissue was removed from one side to expose a single layer of striated muscle, which was then sandwiched between two symmetrical titanium frames. The tumour spheroid (approximately 600 μm) was placed in close proximity to a blood vessel immediately before sealing the chamber with a glass cover slip. Angiogenesis (around spheroids and at sites within the chamber but distant to the spheroid), and associated microcirculatory variables, including vessel length, vessel number and junction numbers, were characterised using in vivo microscopy. Visualisation of tumour spheroid growth and angiogenesis in situ involved placing the mice in a plexiglass restrainer. Mice were trained to sit in the restrainer prior to surgery avoiding the need for anaesthesia and minimising any effects of stress on microvasculature function. The restrainer was fixed to the stage of a horizontally modified Nikon Optiphot microscope. The window of the chamber protruded through a longitudinal slot allowing the animal to sit in their normal position and the tumour and associated microcirculation to be viewed. Images of the preparation were monitored using a CCD camera (Hitachi, UK), displayed on a monitor (Sony PVM-1443, UK) and recorded on video (Sony S-VHS, UK) tape for off-line computerised analysis (Angiosys, UK). The day of surgery was designated day 0 and recordings were made on days 3 and 7.
At the end of the experiment the animals were killed and appropriate tissue fixed in a zinc chloride fixative before paraffin embedding, to determine the presence of macrophages in the spheroids, as previously described.
Microvascular parameter analysis
The image analysis programme Angiosys (TCS, UK) was used to assess new vessel formation. The area immediately surrounding the spheroid and at least three randomly selected sites, distant to the spheroid, were analysed. The two groups (five animals per group) were analysed at 3 and 7 days after implantation of the spheroid; the parameters measured were mean vessel length (μm), an increase indicating endothelial proliferation and differentiation, the total number of vessels per unit area (vessel density) with and without blood flow indicating the new structures are functional and the number of junctions (branch points) indicates vascular network complexity. All images were collected for analysis using a 10 × objective and the same area was measured at each time point and for each animal. A formal assessment of blood flow was not made. As the spheroids implanted in this series of experiments were coated with alginate it was not possible to measure the growth of new blood vessels into each spheroid.
Statistical analysis
Differences between groups was analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test for nonparametric data. P-values <0.05 were considered as significant.
Monocyte infiltration of spheroids in vitro
T47D breast tumour spheroids were cultured on agarose for 15–18 days reaching approximately 600–800 μm in diameter, (Figure 1A) with a hypoxic centre (Figure 1B and C) and therefore more closely mimicked a small avascular breast tumour or micrometastatic deposit. Monocytes moved into these spheroids relatively quickly, presumably attracted by various chemokines released from the tumour cells. The total number of monocytes that migrated into each spheroid was calculated at various time points after the initiation of coculture in order to determine the rate of infiltration (Figure 1A, Table 1). Monocyte migration into each spheroid continued to increase with time from 432±33.9 after 24 h to 1083±11.9 after 7 days.
The amount of VEGF released from the spheroids was measured by ELISA, and increased over the 7 days, with spheroids containing monocytes releasing at least three times more VEGF than those without monocytes (900–2000pg ml−1 with monocytes and 220–590pg ml−1 without monocytes, Table 1). An ELISA was also used to quantify bFGF release from the spheroids; however, no bFGF was detected using this method.
The major aim of this study was to investigate whether macrophages were involved in the initiation of tumour angiogenesis and thus it was necessary to isolate the tumour spheroids containing human macrophages from infiltration by mouse macrophages, which would have made data interpretation difficult. During the course of this study it was determined that the optimum method for coating spheroids, which allowed implantation into the chamber without causing damage to the spheroid, was to coculture a 14–16 day spheroid with monocytes for 24 h followed by alginate coating. The coated spheroids were cultured for a further 5 days before implantation, allowing macrophage differentiation to occur. Alginate coating the spheroids at this early time point resulted in suboptimal numbers of monocytes infiltrating the spheroid. However, further measurements of VEGF production at a time point immediately before implantation, from both infiltrated and noninfiltrated coated spheroids indicated that the macrophage-containing spheroids were releasing significantly more VEGF than the control spheroids (macrophages vs no macrophages 680±238 vs 226±75pg ml−1). Thus macrophages within the alginate-coated spheroid were releasing VEGF and therefore the contribution to the initiation of tumour angiogenesis could be estimated in the in vivo model. A homogeneous distribution of macrophages surrounding the hypoxic centre was observed in the majority of spheroid sections assessed. Three sections from five different spheroids were quantified and used to estimate the number of infiltrated macrophages per spheroid, which were approximately 400 macrophages (Table 1) at day 7.
In order to demonstrate the porosity of alginate to essential nutrients and growth factors, coated spheroids were incubated with Hoechst 33258 for 15 min, at days 10, 15, 20, and 24. Fluorescent microscopy demonstrated that at all timepoints (Figure 1D) the dye diffused across the alginate coating and stained the tumour cell nuclei.
Angiogenesis in vivo
The dorsal skinfold chamber was surgically implanted into nude mice, the tumour spheroids placed in the window in close proximity to a vessel at the end of surgery and covered with a glass coverslip (Figure 2). In vivo microscopy was performed on days 3 and 7 post-surgery as it is generally accepted that recordings cannot be made at earlier time points ensuring recovery of the surgical site from any trauma. A typical H&E stained section of a spheroid resected from the chamber at the end of an experiment, with the alginate coating clearly visible, is represented in Figure 1E. Sections were also stained for CD68 to ensure the macrophages were still present but the number of macrophages in each spheroid was not assessed at this time (Figure 1F). The sections were also stained with F480, a specific marker of murine macrophages, but no positive staining was detected (data not shown).
The data collected from off-line analysis indicates that angiogenesis were stimulated by the breast tumour spheroids in the presence or absence of macrophages (Figure 3) but the stimulus was increased in the early phase of angiogenesis (day 3) if macrophages were present. Although the data showed that breast tumour spheroids stimulated angiogenesis in the absence of macrophages it also showed that the stimulus was greater in the early phase of tumour angiogenesis if macrophages were present (Figure 3). There was a significant difference between those spheroids which had been infiltrated with human macrophages, for all parameters measured on day 3; increased vessel number P<0.011, increased number of junctions P<0.025 and shorter mean vessel length P<0.046 all indicating increased angiogenesis in the presence of macrophages. By day 7 the number of vessels was significantly greater than on day 3 (49.5±3.08 and 34±1.95 P<0.001 with macrophages, 46±3.29 and 26±2.47 P<0.001 without macrophages) as was the number of junctions (21±1.46 and 14±0.93 P<0.001 with macrophages, 16±1.47 and 11±1.25 P<0.002 without macrophages) implying that new vessels had branched from existing vessels. The mean tubule length measured at these times was less on day 7 than on day 3 (95.2±3.58 and 116±4.92 P<0.001 with macrophages, 102.2±5.58 and 136±6.52 P<0.002 without macrophages) indicating that new shorter blood vessels had sprouted due to the stimulatory effects of the tumour spheroid. However, by day 7 the differences between spheroids with and without macrophages were no longer significant. (Figure 3) A formal assessment of blood flow velocity was not made but the video recordings indicated that the vessels measured were functional.
DISCUSSION
This is the first study to demonstrate that macrophages may modulate tumour angiogenesis in the early stages of development, with increased number of vessels and branches. A number of studies have shown that macrophages congregate in large numbers in the hypoxic areas of many solid tumours, which may be due to the influence of hypoxia on the chemoattractant signalling cascade in the tumour microenvironment (. Macrophages have the ability to both positively and negatively regulate tumour growth; tumour cell cytostasis may be induced, but in contrast tumour cell survival may be promoted by macrophage activation and release of angiogenic and mitogenic cytokines in the tumour microenvironment, such as VEGF, pro-inflammatory cytokines and enzymes. A recent in vivo study by demonstrated a synergistic relationship between breast tumour cells and macrophages in cell migration and suggested a role for tumour associated macrophages in metastasis. In addition clinical studies in breast and endometrial cancer have reported positive correlations with angiogenesis and/or survival. However, the precise role of monocytes and macrophages in tumour angiogenesis and the growth of solid tumours is as yet unclear.
In the current study human monocytes isolated from peripheral blood were cocultured with human breast T47D tumour spheroids allowing monocyte migration into the tumour spheroid where differentiation into tumour-associated macrophages occurs. A necrotic core developed in the breast tumour cell spheroids presumably due to the hypoxic central regions, with HIF1α staining evident surrounding the necrosis. This was similar both in the presence and absence of macrophages and therefore is unlikely to be due to a direct anti-tumour action of the macrophages. VEGF is a potent endothelial cell mitogen and has previously been shown to be released from both T47D tumour cells and macrophages Breast tumour spheroids containing macrophages demonstrated elevated VEGF release (determined by ELISA) when compared to spheroids cultured in the absence of macrophages. In addition a second angiogenesis factor bFGF was measured, using an ELISA, but release of this mitogen was not detected. This data is in agreement with previous studies demonstrating that T47D human breast tumour spheroids/cells do not release bFGF The aim of the current study was to identify whether tumour associated macrophages are involved in the initiation of angiogenesis. Thus the spheroids required coating to allow diffusion of angiogenic factors out of the spheroids but prevent spheroid infiltration of autologous murine macrophages. A number of studies have used alginate, derived from brown seaweed, as a means of encapsulating cells for in vivo implantation, thereby isolating them from the host immune cells. Previous studies demonstrated the coating has no effect on cellular growth or proliferation, and indicated that in the first week after implantation in vivo, mononuclear cells migrated to the rim of the alginate spheroid but there was no penetration, and over the following nine weeks, the number of migrating cells gradually decreased. The permeability to diffusible molecules was demonstrated by Hoescht staining of tumour cells, following addition to the culture medium, and the release of VEGF but not cells into the well suggesting that coating allowed the passage of molecules but not cells into and out of the spheroids. Immediately before implantation a sample of spheroids was collected, and processed for histology and immunohistochemistry, which demonstrated the viability of both tumour cells and macrophages, surrounding the hypoxic centre. The number of macrophages present in breast tumour samples has rarely been documented, the majority of published studies relating tumour associated macrophages with tumour survival focus on macrophage “hot spots” and their relationship to markers of angiogenesis in tumour sections. A recent study by did, however, calculate the relative levels of leukocytes within breast tumour biopsies and found 490 macrophages/mm2 in medullary carcinomas and 343 mm−2 in ductal carcinomas.
The role of macrophages has not been extensively studied in vivo. The hypothesis of the current study is that the presence of macrophages increase the angiogenic potential of tumour spheroids through the increased production of VEGF. Thus to evaluate any role for macrophages in the initiation of tumour angiogenesis, an in vivo model involving the implantation of breast tumour spheroids into a dorsal skinfold chamber on nude mice has been developed in our laboratory. The mice are immunodeficient, with an absence of T cells but a normal complement of B cells and elevated levels of both natural killer cells and macrophages. Macrophages in nude mice appear more potent than those from mice with a normal thymus.
Following implantation, parameters measured to determine any effect of the macrophages on angiogenesis included vessel length, vessel numbers, junctions or branch points, in areas directly adjacent to, in addition to distant from the spheroid. Mean vessel diameter is not presented as often distant sites included large host vessels present throughout the procedure, which skewed analysis. The angiogenesis parameter measurements three days after implantation of the tumour spheroid indicated that macrophages play a role in the initial angiogenic response, with significant increases in the density of blood vessels and the number of junctions, with a reduction in vessel length in comparison to control spheroids composed solely of tumour cells. The shorter vessel length was an unexpected and as yet unexplained finding although vessels were generally of a length found in other in vivo models. Tumour cells are a known source of angiogenic factors and T47D tumour cells produce VEGF, thus it was not surprising that over the course of the experiment, the tumour spheroids without human macrophages showed evidence of increased angiogenic activity surrounding the spheroids. By day 7 there were no significant differences in the angiogenic parameters measured between the experimental and control groups, although immunohistochemistry demonstrated that the macrophages continued to release VEGF. At the end of each experiment all tissue from the chamber was processed and stained, and demonstrated that the tumour cells remained viable, that macrophages remained within the spheroid throughout the experimental period and that host macrophages had not permeated the alginate coating. The size of each spheroid was not measured at the end of the experiments, but previous studies have shown that it is possible for cell growth to occur within the confines of the agarose coating.
In conclusion therefore, the current study demonstrates that macrophages present within a solid tumour may significantly contribute to the initiation of angiogenesis. However, in the absence of macrophages, tumour cells produce the necessary stimuli to initiate tumour angiogenesis but initiation is delayed. Further long-term studies, using a syngenic murine model and uncoated spheroids infiltrated with host murine macrophages, allowing the tumour stroma to play a role, or with host macrophage function inhibited, would allow the contribution of macrophages to the maintenance of angiogenesis, endothelial cell survival and tumour growth to be determined. In addition the model could be used to assess the future of the macrophage as a target for tumour therapy.
References 45
- 1.
Barbera-Guillem E, Nyhus JK, Wolford CC, Friece CR, Sampsel JW (2002 ) Vascular endothelial growth factor secretion by tumor-infiltrating macrophages essentially supports tumor angiogenesis and IgG immune complexes potentiate the process. Cancer Res 62: 7042–7049
Not in our library
- 2.
Beckstead JH (1994 ) A simple technique for preservation of fixation-sensitive antigens in paraffin-embedded tissues. J Histochem Cytochem 42: 1127–1134
Not in our library10.1177/42.8.8027531
- 3.
Bicknell R, Lewis CE, Ferarra N (Eds) (1997 ) Tumour Angiogenesis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Not in our library
- 4.
Bingle L, Brown NJ, Lewis CE (2002a ) The role of tumour–associated macrophages in tumour progression: implications for new anti-cancer therapies. J Path 196: 254–265
Not in our library10.1002/path.1027
- 5.
Bingle L, Corke K, Reed MWR, Brown NJ, Lewis CE (2002b ) Macrophage infiltration into tumour spheroids stimulates angiogenesis in the dorsal skin fold chamber in vivo. Proc AACR 43: 502
Not in our library
- 6.
Blancher C, Moore JW, Talks KL, Houlbrook S, Harris AL (2000 ) Relationship of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha and HIF-2alpha expression to vascular endothelial growth factor induction and hypoxia survival in human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 60: 7106–7113
Not in our library
- 7.
Blood CH, Zetter BR (1990 ) Tumour interactions with the vasculature. Biochim Biophys Acta 1032: 89–118
Not in our library10.1016/0304-419x(90)90014-r
- 8.
Blot E, Chen W, Vasse M, Paysant J, Denoyelle C, Pille JY, Vincent L, Vannier JP, Soria J, Soria C (2003 ) Co-operation between monocytes and breast cancer cells promotes factors involved in cancer aggressiveness. Br J Cancer 88: 1207–1212
Not in our library10.1038/sj.bjc.6600872
- 9.
Borgstrom P, Discipio R, Maione TE (1998 ) Recombinant platelet factor 4, an angiogenic marker for human breast cancer. Anticancer Res 18: 4035–4041
Not in our library
- 10.
Borgstrom P, Hillan KJ, Sriramarao P, Ferrara N (1996 ) Complete inhibition of angiogenesis and growth of microtumours by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor neutralising antibody: novel concepts of angiostatic therapy from intravital videomicroscopy. Cancer Res 56: 4032–4039
Not in our library
- 11.
Bouma-ter Steege JC, Baeten CI, Thijssen VL, Satijn SA, Verhoeven IC, Hillen HF, Wagstaff J, Griffioen AW (2004 ) Angiogenic profile of breast carcinoma determines leukocyte infiltration. Clin Cancer Res 10(21): 7171–7178
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0742
- 12.
Budzynski W, Radzikowski C (1994 ) Cytotoxic cells in immunodeficient athymic mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 16: 319–346
Not in our library10.3109/08923979409007097
- 13.
Donovan D, Brown NJ, Bishop ET, Lewis CE (2001 ) Comparison of three in vitro human angiogenesis assays with capillaries formed in vivo. Angiogenesis 4: 113–121
Not in our library10.1023/a:1012218401036
- 14.
Folkman J (1971 ) Tumour angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. New Engl J Med 285: 1182–1186
Not in our library10.1056/nejm197111182852108
- 15.
Gilead A, Meir G, Neeman M (2004 ) The role of angiogenesis, vascular maturation, regression and stromal infiltration in dormancy and growth of implanted MLS ovarian carcinoma spheroids. Int J Cancer 108: 524–531
Not in our library10.1002/ijc.11583
- 16.
Grimshaw MJ, Balkwill FR (2001 ) Inhibition of monocyte and macrophage chemotaxis by hypoxia and inflammation--a potential mechanism. Eur J Immunol 31: 480–489
Not in our library10.1002/1521-4141(200102)31:2<480::aid-immu480>3.0.co;2-l
- 17.
Harmey JH, Dimitriadis E, Kay E, Redmond HP, Bouchier-Hayes D (1998 ) Regulation of macrophage production of VEGF by hypoxia and TGF b-1. Ann Surg Oncol 5: 271–278
Not in our library10.1007/bf02303785
- 18.
Jain RK, Safabakhsh N, Sckell A, Chen Y, Jiang P, Benjamin L, Yuan F, Keshet E (1998 ) Endothelial cell death, angiogenesis, and microvascular function after castration in an androgen-dependent tumor: role of vascular endothelial growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 10820–10825
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.95.18.10820
- 19.
Kataki A, Scheid P, Piet M, Marie B, Martinet N, Martinet Y, Vignaud JM (2002 ) Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and macrophages have a potential dual role in lung cancer by supporting both host-defense and tumor progression. J Lab Clin Med 140: 320–328
Not in our library10.1067/mlc.2002.128317
- 20.
- 21.
Konur A, Kreutz M, Knuchel R, Krause SW, Andreesen R (1998 ) Cytokine repertoire during maturation of monocytes to macrophages within spheroids of malignant and non-malignant urothelial cell lines. Int J Cancer 78: 648–653
Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19981123)78:5<648::aid-ijc20>3.0.co;2-n
- 22.
Leek RD, Lewis CE, Harris AL (1997 ) The role of macrophages in tumour angiogenesis. In: Tumour Angiogenesis Bicknell R, Lewis CE and Ferarra N (eds), pp Oxford: Oxford University Press
Not in our library
- 23.
Leek RD, Lewis CE, Whitehouse R, Greenall M, Clarke J, Harris AL (1996 ) Association of macrophage infiltration with angiogenesis and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 56: 4625–4629
Not in our library
- 24.
Lehr H, Leunig M, Menger MD, Messmer K (1993 ) Dorsal skinfold chamber technique for intra-vital microscopy on striated muscle in nude mice. Am J Pathol 143: 1055–1062
Not in our library
- 25.
Lewis CE, Leek RD, Harris AL, McGee JOD (1995 ) Cytokine regulation of angiogenesis in breast cancer: the role of tumour associated macrophages. J Leuk Biol 57: 747–751
Not in our library10.1002/jlb.57.5.747
- 26.
Lewis JS, Landers R, Underwood JCE, Harris AL, Lewis CE (2000 ) Expression of VEGF by macrophages is upregulated in avascular areas of breast carcinomas. J Pathol 192: 150–158
Not in our library10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999<::aid-path687>3.0.co;2-g
- 27.
Li C-Y, Shan S, Huang Q, Braun RD, Lanzen J, Hu K, Lin P, Dewhirst MW (2000 ) Initial stages of tumor cell-induced angiogenesis: evaluation via skin window chambers in rodent models. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 143–147
Not in our library10.1093/jnci/92.2.143
- 28.
Lichtenbeld HC, Barendsz-Janson AF, van Essen H, Struijker H, Griffioen AW, Hillen HF (1998 ) Angiogenic potential of malignant and non-malignant human breast tissues in an in vivo angiogenesis model. Int J Cancer 77: 455–459
Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980729)77:3<455::aid-ijc23>3.0.co;2-5
- 29.
Lin EY, Nguyen AV, Russell RG, Pollard JW (2001 ) Colony-stimulating factor 1 promotes progression of mammary tumours to malignancy. J Exp Med 193: 727–739
Not in our library10.1084/jem.193.6.727
- 30.
- 31.
Mantovani A, Bottazzi B, Colatta F, Sozani S, Ruco L (1992 ) The origin and function of tumour associated macrophages. Immunol Today 13: 265–270
Not in our library10.1016/0167-5699(92)90008-u
- 32.
Negus RP, Stamp GW, Hadley J, Balkwill FR (1997 ) Quantitative assessment of the leukocyte infiltrate in ovarian cancer and its relationship to the expression of C-C chemokines. Am J Pathol 150: 1723–1734
Not in our library
- 33.
Nilsson TM, Brown NJ, Thomas BG, Robson CG, Bryden GA, Hamdy FC (2002 ) In vivo analysis of angiogenesis within matched primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Proc AACR 43: 510
Not in our library
- 34.
O’Sullivan C, Lewis CE, Harris AL, McGee JOD (1993 ) Secretion of epidermal growth factor by macrophages associated with breast carcinoma. Lancet 342: 148–149
Not in our library10.1016/0140-6736(93)91348-p
- 35.
Orre M, Rogers PAW (1999 ) Macrophages and microvessel density in tumours of the ovary. Gyn Oncol 73: 47–50
Not in our library10.1006/gyno.1998.5292
- 36.
Pyke C, Graem N, Ralfkiaer E, Ronne E, Hoyer-Hansen G, Brunner N, Dano K (1993 ) Receptor for urokinase is present in tumour-associated macrophages in ductal breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 53: 1911–1915
Not in our library
- 37.
Read TA, Farhadi M, Bjerkvig R, Olsen BR, Rokstad AM, Huszthy PC, Vajkoczy P (2001 ) Intravital microscopy reveals novel antivascular and antitumor effects of endostatin delivered locally by alginate-encapsulated cells. Cancer Res 61: 6830–6837
Not in our library
- 38.
Read TA, Stensvaag V, Vindenes H, Ulvestad E, Bjerkvig R, Thorsen F (1999 ) Cells encapsulated in alginate: a potential system for delivery of recombinant proteins to malignant brain tumours. Int J Dev Neurosci 17: 653–663
Not in our library10.1016/s0736-5748(99)00052-0
- 39.
Salvesen HB, Akslen LA (1999 ) Significance of tumour-associated macrophages, vascular endothelial growth factor and thrombospodin-1 expression for tumour angiogenesis and prognosis in endometrial carcinomas. Int J Cancer 84: 538–543
Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991022)84:5<538::aid-ijc17>3.0.co;2-b
- 40.
Skobe M, Rockwell P, Goldstein N, Vosseler S, Fusenig NE (1997 ) Halting angiogenesis suppresses carcinoma cell invasion. Nature Med 3: 1222–1227
Not in our library10.1038/nm1197-1222
Cited by papers we hold 6
- Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Their Functional Transformation in the Hypoxic Tumor Microenvironment · 2021No notice
- Heparanase and the hallmarks of cancer · 2020No notice
- Modeling tumor cell adaptations to hypoxia in multicellular tumor spheroids · 2017No notice
- Soy and Breast Cancer: Focus on Angiogenesis · 2015No notice
- Tumor-Associated Macrophages as Major Players in the Tumor Microenvironment · 2014No notice
- The role of tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer progression · 2013No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.