No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
Deep learning-enabled medical computer vision
Andre Esteva, Katherine Chou, Serena Yeung and 7 more
npj Digital Medicine · 2021 · Review · CC BY
doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00376-2
Abstract
A decade of unprecedented progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated the potential for many fields—including medicine—to benefit from the insights that AI techniques can extract from data. Here we survey recent progress in the development of modern computer vision techniques—powered by deep learning—for medical applications, focusing on medical imaging, medical video, and clinical deployment. We start by briefly summarizing a decade of progress in convolutional neural networks, including the vision tasks they enable, in the context of healthcare. Next, we discuss several example medical imaging applications that stand to benefit—including cardiology, pathology, dermatology, ophthalmology–and propose new avenues for continued work. We then expand into general medical video, highlighting ways in which clinical workflows can integrate computer vision to enhance care. Finally, we discuss the challenges and hurdles required for real-world clinical deployment of these technologies.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Computer vision (CV) has a rich history spanning decades of efforts to enable computers to perceive visual stimuli meaningfully. Machine perception spans a range of levels, from low-level tasks such as identifying edges, to high-level tasks such as understanding complete scenes. Advances in the last decade have largely been due to three factors: (1) the maturation of deep learning (DL)—a type of machine learning that enables end-to-end learning of very complex functions from raw data (2) strides in localized compute power via GPUs, and (3) the open-sourcing of large labeled datasets with which to train these algorithms. The combination of these three elements has enabled individual researchers the resource access needed to advance the field. As the research community grew exponentially, so did progress.
The growth of modern CV has overlapped with the generation of large amounts of digital data in a number of scientific fields. Recent medical advances have been prolific,, owing largely to DL’s remarkable ability to learn many tasks from most data sources. Using large datasets, CV models can acquire many pattern-recognition abilities—from physician-level diagnostics to medical scene perception. See Fig. 1.
Here we survey the intersection of CV and medicine, focusing on research in medical imaging, medical video, and real clinical deployment. We discuss key algorithmic capabilities which unlocked these opportunities, and dive into the myriad of accomplishments from recent years. The clinical tasks suitable for CV span many categories, such as screening, diagnosis, detecting conditions, predicting future outcomes, segmenting pathologies from organs to cells, monitoring disease, and clinical research. Throughout, we consider the future growth of this technology and its implications for medicine and healthcare.
Computer vision
Object classification, localization, and detection, respectively refer to identifying the type of an object in an image, the location of objects present, and both type and location simultaneously. The ImageNet Large-Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) was a spearhead to progress in these tasks over the last decade. It created a large community of DL researchers competing and collaborating together to improve techniques on various CV tasks. The first contemporary, GPU-powered DL approach, in 2012, yielded an inflection point in the growth of this community, heralding an era of significant year-over-year improvements– through the competition’s final year in 2017. Notably, classification accuracy achieved human-level performance during this period. Within medicine, fine-grained versions of these methods have successfully been applied to the classification and detection of many diseases (Fig. 2). Given sufficient data, the accuracy often matches or surpasses the level of expert physicians,. Similarly, the segmentation of objects has substantially improved,, particularly in challenging scenarios such as the biomedical segmentation of multiple types of overlapping cells in microscopy. The key DL technique leveraged in these tasks is the convolutional neural network (CNN)—a type of DL algorithm which hardcodes translational invariance, a key feature of image data. Many other CV tasks have benefited from this progress, including image registration (identifying corresponding points across similar images), image retrieval (finding similar images), and image reconstruction and enhancement. The specific challenges of working with medical data require the utilization of many types of AI models.
These techniques largely rely on supervised learning, which leverages datasets that contain both data points (e.g. images) and data labels (e.g. object classes). Given the sparsity and access difficulties of medical data, transfer learning—in which an algorithm is first trained on a large and unrelated corpus (e.g. ImageNet), then fine-tuned on a dataset of interest (e.g. medical)—has been critical for progress. To reduce the costs associated with collecting and labeling data, techniques to generate synthetic data, such as data augmentation and generative adversarial networks (GANs) are being developed. Researchers have even shown that crowd-sourcing image annotations can yield effective medical algorithms,. Recently, self-supervised learning—in which implicit labels are extracted from data points and used to train algorithms (e.g predicting the spatial arrangement of tiles generated from splitting an image into pieces)—have pushed the field towards fully unsupervised learning, which lacks the need for labels. Applying these techniques in medicine will reduce the barrier to development and deployment.
Medical data access is central to this field, and key ethical and legal questions must be addressed. Do patients own their de-identified data? What if methods to re-identify data improve over time? Should the community open-source large quantities of data? To date, academia and industry have largely relied on small, open-source datasets, and data collected through commercial products. Dynamics around data sharing and country-specific availability will impact deployment opportunities. The field of federated learning—in which centralized algorithms can be trained on distributed data that never leaves protected enclosures—may enable a workaround in stricter jurisdictions.
These advances have spurred growth in other domains of CV, such as multimodal learning, which combines vision with other modalities such as language (Fig. 1a), time-series data, and genomic data. These methods can combine with 3D vision, to turn depth-cameras into privacy-preserving sensors, making deployment easier for patient settings such as the intensive care unit. The range of tasks is even broader in video. Applications like activity recognition and live scene understanding are useful in detecting and responding to important or adverse clinical events.
Medical imaging
In recent years the number of publications applying computer vision techniques to static medical imagery has grown from hundreds to thousands. A few areas have received substantial attention—radiology, pathology, ophthalmology, and dermatology—owing to the visual pattern-recognition nature of diagnostic tasks in these specialities, and the growing availability of highly structured images.
The unique characteristics of medical imagery pose a number of challenges to DL-based computer vision. For one, images can be massive. Digitizing histopathology slides produces gigapixel images of around 100,000 ×100,000 pixels, whereas typical CNN image inputs are around 200 ×200 pixels. Further, different chemical preparations will render different slides for the same piece of tissue, and different digitization devices or settings may produce different images for the same slide. Radiology modalities such as CT and MRI render equally massive 3D images, forcing standard CNNs to either work with a set of 2D slices, or adjust their internal structure to process in 3D. Similarly, ultrasound renders a time-series of noisy 2D slices of a 3D context–slices which are spatially correlated but not aligned. DL has started to account for the unique challenges of medical data. For instance, multiple-instance-learning (MIL) enables learning from datasets containing massive images and few labels (e.g. histopathology). 3D convolutions in CNNs are enabling better learning from 3D volumes (e.g MRI and CT). Spatio-temporal models and image registration enable working with time-series images (e.g. ultrasound).
Dozens of companies have obtained US FDA and European CE approval for medical imaging AI, and commercial markets have begun to form as sustainable business models are created. For instance, regions of high-throughput healthcare, such as India and Thailand, have welcomed the deployment of technologies such as diabetic retinopathy screening systems. This rapid growth has now reached the point of directly impacting patient outcomes—the US CMS recently approved reimbursement for a radiology stroke triage use-case which reduces the time it takes for patients to receive treatment.
CV in medical modalities with non-standardized data collection requires the integration of CV into existing physical systems. For instance, in otolaryngology, CNNs can be used to help primary care physicians manage patients’ ears, nose, and throat, through mountable devices attached to smartphones. Hematology and serology can benefit from microscope-integrated AIs that diagnose common conditions or count blood cells of various types—repetitive tasks that are easy to augment with CNNs. AI in gastroenterology has demonstrated stunning capabilities. Video-based CNNs can be integrated into endoscopic procedures for scope guidance, lesion detection, and lesion diagnosis. Applications include esophageal cancer screening, detecting gastric cancer,, detecting stomach infections such as H. Pylori, and even finding hookworms. Scientists have taken this field one step further by building entire medical AI devices designed for monitoring, such as at-home smart toilets outfitted with diagnostic CNNs on cameras. Beyond the analysis of disease states, CV can serve the future of human health and welfare through applications such as screening human embryos for implantation.
Computer vision in radiology is so pronounced that it has quickly burgeoned into its own field of research, growing a corpus of work– that extends into all modalities, with a focus on X-rays, CT, and MRI. Chest X-ray analysis—a key clinical focus area—has been an exemplar. The field has collected nearly 1 million annotated, open-source images–—the closest ImageNet equivalent to date in medical CV. Analysis of brain imagery (particularly for time-critical use-cases like stroke), and abdominal imagery have similarly received substantial attention. Disease classification, nodule detection, and region segmentation (e.g. ventricular) models have been developed for most conditions for which data can be collected. This has enabled the field to respond rapidly in times of crisis—for instance, developing and deploying COVID-19 detection models. The field continues to expand with work in image translation (e.g. converting noisy ultrasound images into MRI), image reconstruction and enhancement (e.g. converting low-dosage, low-resolution CT images into high-resolution images), automated report generation, and temporal tracking (e.g. image registration to track tumor growth over time). In the sections below, we explore vision-based applications in other specialties.
Cardiology
Cardiac imaging is increasingly used in a wide array of clinical diagnoses and workflows. Key clinical applications for deep learning include diagnosis and screening. The most common imaging modality in cardiovascular medicine is the cardiac ultrasound, or echocardiogram. As a cost-effective, radiation-free technique, echocardiography is uniquely suited for DL due to straightforward data acquisition and interpretation—it is routinely used in most acute inpatient facilities, outpatient centers, and emergency rooms. Further, 3D imaging techniques such as CT and MRI are used for the understanding of cardiac anatomy and to better characterize supply-demand mismatch. CT segmentation algorithms have even been FDA—cleared for coronary artery visualization.
There are many example applications. DL can be trained on a large database of echocardiographic studies and surpass the performance of board-certified echocardiographers in view classification. Computational DL pipelines can assess hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloid, and pulmonary arterial hypertension. EchoNet—a deep learning model that can recognize cardiac structures, estimate function, and predict systemic phenotypes that are not readily identifiable to human interpretation—has recently furthered the field.
To account for challenges around data access, data-efficient echocardiogram algorithms have been developed, such as semi-supervised GANs that are effective at downstream tasks (e.g predicting left ventricular hypertrophy). To account for the fact that most studies utilize privately held medical imaging datasets, 10,000 annotated echocardiogram videos were recently open-sourced. Alongside this release, a video-based model, EchoNet-Dynamic, was developed. It can estimate ejection fraction and assess cardiomyopathy, alongside a comprehensive evaluation criterion based on results from an external dataset and human experts.
Pathology
Pathologists play a key role in cancer detection and treatment. Pathological analysis—based on visual inspection of tissue samples under microscope—is inherently subjective in nature. Differences in visual perception and clinical training can lead to inconsistencies in diagnostic and prognostic opinions–. Here, DL can support critical medical tasks, including diagnostics, prognostication of outcomes and treatment response, pathology segmentation, disease monitoring, and so forth.
Recent years have seen the adoption of sub-micron-level resolution tissue scanners that capture gigapixel whole-slide images (WSI). This development, coupled with advances in CV has led to research and commercialization activity in AI-driven digital histopathology. This field has the potential to (i) overcome limitations of human visual perception and cognition by improving the efficiency and accuracy of routine tasks, (ii) develop new signatures of disease and therapy from morphological structures invisible to the human eye, and (iii) combine pathology with radiological, genomic, and proteomic measurements to improve diagnosis and prognosis.
One thread of research has focused on automating the routine, time-consuming task of localization and quantification of morphological features. Examples include the detection and classification of cells, nuclei, and mitoses–, and the localization and segmentation of histological primitives such as nuclei, glands, ducts, and tumors–. These methods typically require expensive manual annotation of tissue components by pathologists as training data.
Another research avenue focuses on direct diagnostics– and prognostics, from WSI or tissue microarrays (TMA) for a variety of cancers—breast, prostate, lung cancer, etc. Studies have even shown that morphological features captured by a hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain are predictive of molecular biomarkers utilized in theragnosis,. While histopathology slides digitize into massive, data-rich gigapixel images, region-level annotations are sparse and expensive. To help overcome this challenge, the field has developed DL algorithms based on multiple-instance learning that utilize slide-level “weak” annotations and exploit the sheer size of these images for improved performance.
The data abundance of this domain has further enabled tasks such as virtual staining, in which models are trained to predict one type of image (e.g. a stained image) from another (e.g. a raw microscopy image). See Fig. 1b. Moving forward, AI algorithms that learn to perform diagnosis, prognosis, and theragnosis using digital pathology image archives and annotations readily available from electronic health records have the potential to transform the fields of pathology and oncology.
Dermatology
The key clinical tasks for DL in dermatology include lesion-specific differential diagnostics, finding concerning lesions amongst many benign lesions, and helping track lesion growth over time. A series of works have demonstrated that CNNs can match the performance of board-certified dermatologists at classifying malignant skin lesions from benign ones,,. These studies have sequentially tested increasing numbers of dermatologists (25– 57–, 157–), consistently demonstrating a sensitivity and specificity in classification that matches or even exceeds physician levels. These studies were largely restricted to the binary classification task of discerning benign vs malignant cutaneous lesions, classifying either melanomas from nevi or carcinomas from seborrheic keratoses.
Recently, this line of work has expanded to encompass differential diagnostics across dozens of skin conditions, including non-neoplastic lesions such as rashes and genetic conditions, and incorporating non-visual metadata (e.g. patient demographics) as classifier inputs. These works have been catalyzed by open-access image repositories and AI challenges that encourage teams to compete on predetermined benchmarks.
Incorporating these algorithms into clinical workflows would allow their utility to support other key tasks, including large-scale detection of malignancies on patients with many lesions, and tracking lesions across images in order to capture temporal features, such as growth and color changes. This area remains fairly unexplored, with initial works that jointly train CNNs to detect and track lesions.
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology, in recent years, has observed a significant uptick in AI efforts, with dozens of papers demonstrating clinical diagnostic and analytical capabilities that extend beyond current human capability–. The potential clinical impact is significant,—the portability of the machinery used to inspect the eye means that pop-up clinics and telemedicine could be used to distribute testing sites to underserved areas. The field depends largely on fundus imaging, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to diagnose and manage patients.
CNNs can accurately diagnose a number of conditions. Diabetic retinopathy—a condition in which blood vessels in the eyes of diabetic patients “leak” and can lead to blindness—has been extensively studied. CNNs consistently demonstrate physician-level grading from fundus photographs–, which has led to a recent US FDA-cleared system. Similarly, they can diagnose or predict the progression of center-involved diabetic macular edema, age-related macular degeneration,, glaucoma,, manifest visual field loss, childhood blindness, and others.
The eyes contain a number of non-human-interpretable features, indicative of meaningful medical information, that CNNs can pick up on. Remarkably, it was shown that CNNs can classify a number of cardiovascular and diabetic risk factors from fundus photographs, including age, gender, smoking, hemoglobin-A1c, body-mass index, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. CNNs can also pick up signs of anemia and chronic kidney disease from fundus photographs. This presents an exciting opportunity for future AI studies predicting nonocular information from eye images. This could lead to a paradigm shift in care in which eye exams screen you for the presence of both ocular and nonocular disease—something currently limited for human physicians.
Surgical applications
The CV may provide significant utility in procedural fields such as surgery and endoscopy. Key clinical applications for deep learning include enhancing surgeon performance through real-time contextual awareness, skills assessments, and training. Early studies have begun pursuing these objectives, primarily in video-based robotic and laparoscopic surgery—a number of works propose methods for detecting surgical tools and actions–. Some studies analyze tool movement or other cues to assess surgeon skill,,,, through established ratings such as the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) criteria for laparoscopic surgery. Another line of work uses CV to recognize distinct phases of surgery during operations, towards developing context-aware computer assistance systems,. CV is also starting to emerge in open surgery settings, of which there is a significant volume. The challenge here lies in the diversity of video capture viewpoints (e.g., head-mounted, side-view, and overhead cameras) and types of surgeries. For all types of surgical video, translating CV analysis to tools and applications that can improve patient outcomes is a natural next direction of research.
Human activity
CV can recognize human activity in physical spaces, such as hospitals and clinics, for a range of “ambient intelligence” applications. Ambient intelligence refers to a continuous, non-invasive awareness of activity in a physical space that can provide clinicians, nurses, and other healthcare workers with assistance such as patient monitoring, automated documentation, and monitoring for protocol compliance (Fig. 3). In hospitals, for example, early works have demonstrated CV-based ambient intelligence in intensive care units to monitor for safety-critical behaviors such as hand hygiene activity and patient mobilization,,. CV has also been developed for the emergency department, to transcribe procedures performed during the resuscitation of a patient, and for the operating room (OR), to recognize activities for workflow optimization. At the hospital operations level, CV can be a scalable and detailed form of labor and resource measurement that improves resource allocation for optimal care.
Outside of hospitals, ambient intelligence can increase access to healthcare. For instance, it could enable at-risk seniors to live independently at home, by monitoring for safety and abnormalities in daily activities (e.g. detecting falls, which are particularly dangerous for the elderly,), assisted living, and physiological measurement. Similar work– has targeted broader categories of daily activity. Recognizing and computing long-term descriptive analytics of activities such as sleeping, walking, and sitting over time can detect clinically meaningful changes or anomalies. To ensure patient privacy, researchers have developed CV algorithms that work with thermal video data. Another application area of CV is assisted living or rehabilitation, such as continuous sign language recognition to assist people with communication difficulties, and monitoring of physiotherapy exercises for stroke rehabilitation. CV also offers potential as a tool for remote physiological measurements. For instance, systems could use video to analyze heart and breathing rates. As telemedicine visits increase in frequency, CV could play a role in patient triaging, particularly in times of high demand such as the COVID-19 pandemic. CV-based ambient intelligence technologies offer a wide range of opportunities for increased access to quality care.; However new ethical and legal questions will arise in the design of these technologies.
Clinical deployment
As medical AI advances into the clinic, it will simultaneously have the power to do great good for society, and to potentially exacerbate long-standing inequalities and perpetuate errors in medicine. If done properly and ethically, medical AI can become a flywheel for more equitable care—the more it is used, the more data it acquires, the more accurate and general it becomes. The key is in understanding the data that the models are built on and the environment in which they are deployed. Here, we present four key considerations when applying ML technologies in healthcare: assessment of data, planning for model limitations, community participation, and trust building.
Data quality largely determines model quality; identifying inequities in the data and taking them into account will lead towards more equitable healthcare. Procuring the right datasets may depend on running human-in-the-loop programs or broad-reaching data collection techniques. There are a number of methods that aim to remove bias in data. Individual-level bias can be addressed via expert discussion and labeling adjudication. Population-level bias can be addressed via missing data supplements and distributional shifts. International multi-institutional evaluation is a robust method to determine generalizability of models across diverse populations, medical equipment, resource settings, and practice patterns. In addition, using multi-task learning to train models to perform a variety of tasks rather than one narrowly defined task, such as multi-cancer detection from histopathology images, makes them more generally useful and often more robust.
Transparent reporting can reveal potential weaknesses and help address model limitations. Guardrails to protect against possible worst-case scenarios—minority, dismissal, or automation bias—must be put in place. It is insufficient to report and be satisfied with strong performance measures on general datasets when delivering care for patients—there should be an understanding of the specific instances in which the model fails. One technique is to assess demographic performance in combination with saliency maps, to visualize what the model pays attention to, and check for potential biases. For instance, when using deep learning to develop a differential diagnosis for skin diseases, researchers examined the model performance based on Fitzpatrick skin types and other demographic information to determine patient types for which there were insufficient examples, and inform future data collection. Further, they used saliency masks to verify the model was informed by skin abnormalities and not skin type. See Fig. 4.
A known limitation of ML is its performance on out-of-distribution data–data samples that are unlike any seen during model training. Progress has been made on out-of-distribution detection and developing confidence intervals to help detect anomalies. Additionally, methods are developing to understand the uncertainty around model outputs. This is especially critical when implementing patient-specific predictions that impact safety.
Community participation—from patients, physicians, computer scientists, and other relevant stakeholders—is paramount to successful deployment. This has helped identify structural drivers of racial bias in health diagnostics—particularly in discovering bias in datasets and identifying demographics for which models fail. User-centered evaluations are a valuable tool in ensuring a system’s usability and fit into the real world. What’s the best way to present a model’s output to facilitate clinical decision making? How should a mobile app system be deployed in resource-constrained environments, such as areas with intermittent connectivity? For example, when launching ML-powered diabetic retinopathy models in Thailand and India, researchers noticed that model performance was impacted by socioeconomic factors, and determined that where a model is most useful may not be where the model was generated. Ophthalmology models may need to be deployed in endocrinology care, as opposed to eye centers, due to access issues in the specific local environment. Another effective tool to build physician trust in AI results is side-by-side deployment of ML models with existing workflows (e.g manual grading). See Fig. 5. Without question, AI models will require rigorous evaluation through clinical trials, to gauge safety and effectiveness. Excitingly, AI and CV can also help support clinical trials, through a number of applications—including patient selection, tumor tracking, adverse event detection, etc—creating an ecosystem in which AI can help design safe AI.
Trust for AI in healthcare is fundamental to its adoption both by clinical teams and by patients. The foundation of clinical trust will come in large part from rigorous prospective trials that validate AI algorithms in real-world clinical environments. These environments incorporate human and social responses, which can be hard to predict and control, but for which AI technologies must account for. Whereas the randomness and human element of clinical environments are impossible to capture in retrospective studies, prospective trials that best reflect clinical practice will shift the conversation towards measurable benefits in real deployments. Here, AI interpretability will be paramount—predictive models will need the ability to describe why specific factors about the patient or environment lead them to their predictions.
In addition to clinical trust, patient trust—particularly around privacy concerns—must be earned. One significant area of need is next-generation regulations that account for advances in privacy-preserving techniques. ML typically does not require traditional identifiers to produce useful results, but there are meaningful signals in data that can be considered sensitive. To unlock insights from these sensitive data types, the evolution of privacy-preserving techniques must continue, and further advances need to be made in fields such as federated learning and federated analytics.
Each technological wave affords us a chance to reshape our future. In this case, artificial intelligence, deep learning, and computer vision represent an opportunity to make healthcare far more accessible, equitable, accurate, and inclusive than it has ever been.
References 157
- 1.
Szeliski, R. Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications (Springer Science & Business Media, 2010).
Not in our library
- 2.
- 3.
Sanders, J. & Kandrot, E. CUDA by example: an introduction to general-purpose GPU programming. Addison-Wesley Professional; 2010 Jul 19.BibTeXEndNoteRefManRefWorks
Not in our library
- 4.
Deng, J. et al. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 248–255 (IEEE, 2009).
Not in our library
- 5.
Esteva A, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat. Med. 2019;25:24-29.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z
- 6.
Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 2019;25:44-56.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
- 7.
Esteva A, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115-118.
Not in our library10.1038/nature21056
- 8.
Yeung S, et al. A computer vision system for deep learning-based detection of patient mobilization activities in the ICU. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:11.
Not in our library10.1038/s41746-019-0087-z
- 9.
Russakovsky O, et al. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015;115:211-252.
Not in our library10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y
- 10.
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 (eds Pereira, F., Burges, C. J. C., Bottou, L. & Weinberger, K. Q.) 1097–1105 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2012).
Not in our library
- 11.
Sermanet, P. et al. OverFeat: Integrated Recognition, Localization and Detection using Convolutional Networks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6229 (2013).
Not in our library
- 12.
Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556 (2014).
Not in our library
- 13.
Szegedy, C. et al. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 1–9 (2015).
Not in our library
- 14.
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 770–778 (2016).
Not in our library
- 15.
Gebru, T., Hoffman, J. & Fei-Fei, L. Fine-grained recognition in the wild: a multi-task domain adaptation approach. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 1358–1367 (IEEE, 2017).
Not in our library
- 16.
Gulshan, V. et al. Performance of a deep-learning algorithm vs manual grading for detecting diabetic retinopathy in india. JAMA Ophthalmol.10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2004 (2014).
Not in our library10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2004
- 17.
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention 234–241 (Springer, Cham, 2015).
Not in our library
- 18.
Isensee, F. et al. nnU-Net: self-adapting framework for U-Net-based medical image segmentation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10486 (2018).
Not in our library
- 19.
LeCun, Y. & Bengio, Y. in The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks 255–258 (MIT Press, 1998).
Not in our library
- 20.
Cubuk, E. D., Zoph, B., Mane, D., Vasudevan, V. & Le, Q. V. AutoAugment: learning augmentation policies from data. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09501 (2018).
Not in our library
- 21.
Goodfellow, I. et al. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances inneural information processing systems 2672–2680 (2014).
Not in our library
- 22.
Ørting, S. et al. A survey of Crowdsourcing in medical image analysis. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.09159 (2019).
Not in our library
- 23.
Créquit P, Mansouri G, Benchoufi M, Vivot A, Ravaud P. Mapping of Crowdsourcing in health: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2018;20:e187.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.9330
- 24.
Jing, L. & Tian, Y. in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (IEEE, 2020).
Not in our library10.1109/tpami.2020.2992393
- 25.
McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S. & y Arcas, B. A. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 1273–1282 (PMLR, 2017).
Not in our library
- 26.
Karpathy, A. & Fei-Fei, L. Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 3128–3137 (IEEE, 2015).
Not in our library10.1109/tpami.2016.2598339
- 27.
Lv, D. et al. Research on the technology of LIDAR data processing. In 2017 First International Conference on Electronics Instrumentation Information Systems (EIIS) 1–5 (IEEE, 2017).
Not in our library
- 28.
Lillo I, Niebles JC, Soto A. Sparse composition of body poses and atomic actions for human activity recognition in RGB-D videos. Image Vis. Comput. 2017;59:63-75.
Not in our library10.1016/j.imavis.2016.11.004
- 29.
Haque, A. et al. Towards vision-based smart hospitals: a system for tracking and monitoring hand hygiene compliance. In Proceedings of the 2nd Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, 68, 75–87 (PMLR, 2017).
Not in our library
- 30.
Heilbron, F. C., Escorcia, V., Ghanem, B. & Niebles, J. C. ActivityNet: a large-scale video benchmark for human activity understanding. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 961–970 (IEEE, 2015).
Not in our library
- 31.
Liu, Y. et al. Learning to describe scenes with programs. In ICLR (Open Access, 2019).
Not in our library
- 32.
Singh A, et al. Automatic detection of hand hygiene using computer visiontechnology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2020;27:1316-1320.
Not in our library10.1093/jamia/ocaa115
- 33.
Litjens G, et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 2017;42:60-88.
Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005
- 34.
Maron, O. & Lozano-Pérez, T. in A Framework for Multiple-Instance Learning. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10 (eds Jordan, M. I., Kearns, M. J. & Solla, S. A.) 570–576 (MIT Press, 1998).
Not in our library
- 35.
- 36.
Ouyang D, et al. Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function. Nature. 2020;580:252-256.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2145-8
- 37.
- 38.
Beede, E. et al. A human-centered evaluation of a deep learning system deployed in clinics for the detection of diabetic retinopathy. In Proc. 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–12 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020).
Not in our library
- 39.
Viz.ai Granted Medicare New Technology Add-on Payment. PR Newswire https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vizai-granted-medicare-new-technology-add-on-payment-301123603.html (2020).
Not in our library
- 40.
Crowson MG, et al. A contemporary review of machine learning in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:45-51.
Not in our library10.1002/lary.27850
- 41.
Livingstone D, Talai AS, Chau J, Forkert ND. Building an Otoscopic screening prototype tool using deep learning. J. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 2019;48:66.
Not in our library10.1186/s40463-019-0389-9
- 42.
Chen P-HC, et al. An augmented reality microscope with real-time artificial intelligence integration for cancer diagnosis. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1453-1457.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-019-0539-7
- 43.
Gunčar G, et al. An application of machine learning to haematological diagnosis. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:411.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-18564-8
- 44.
Alam MM, Islam MT. Machine learning approach of automatic identification and counting of blood cells. Health. Technol. Lett. 2019;6:103-108.
Not in our library10.1049/htl.2018.5098
- 45.
El Hajjar A, Rey J-F. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: general overview. Chin. Med. J. 2020;133:326-334.
Not in our library10.1097/cm9.0000000000000623
- 46.
Horie Y, et al. Diagnostic outcomes of esophageal cancer by artificial intelligence using convolutional neural networks. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2019;89:25-32.
Not in our library10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.037
- 47.
Hirasawa T, et al. Application of artificial intelligence using a convolutional neural network for detecting gastric cancer in endoscopic images. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:653-660.
Not in our library10.1007/s10120-018-0793-2
- 48.
Kubota K, Kuroda J, Yoshida M, Ohta K, Kitajima M. Medical image analysis: computer-aided diagnosis of gastric cancer invasion on endoscopic images. Surg. Endosc. 2012;26:1485-1489.
Not in our library10.1007/s00464-011-2036-z
- 49.
Itoh T, Kawahira H, Nakashima H, Yata N. Deep learning analyzes Helicobacter pylori infection by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy images. Endosc. Int Open. 2018;6:E139-E144.
Not in our library10.1055/s-0043-120830
- 50.
He J-Y, Wu X, Jiang Y-G, Peng Q, Jain R. Hookworm detection in wireless capsule endoscopy images with deep learning. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2018;27:2379-2392.
Not in our library10.1109/tip.2018.2801119
- 51.
Park S-M, et al. A mountable toilet system for personalized health monitoring via the analysis of excreta. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020;4:624-635.
Not in our library10.1038/s41551-020-0534-9
- 52.
VerMilyea M, et al. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF. Hum. Reprod. 2020;35:770-784.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deaa013
- 53.
Choy G, et al. Current applications and future impact of machine learning in radiology. Radiology. 2018;288:318-328.
Not in our library10.1148/radiol.2018171820
- 54.
Saba L, et al. The present and future of deep learning in radiology. Eur. J. Radiol. 2019;114:14-24.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.038
- 55.
Mazurowski MA, Buda M, Saha A, Bashir MR. Deep learning in radiology: an overview of the concepts and a survey of the state of the art with focus on MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2019;49:939-954.
Not in our library10.1002/jmri.26534
- 56.
- 57.
Irvin, J. et al. Chexpert: A large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison. In Proc. of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 33, 590–597 (2019).
Not in our library
- 58.
Wang, X. et al. Chestx-ray8: Hospital-scale chest x-ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervisedclassification and localization of common thorax diseases. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2097–2106 (2017).
Not in our library
- 59.
Chilamkurthy S, et al. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2018;392:2388-2396.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31645-3
- 60.
Weston AD, et al. Automated abdominal segmentation of CT scans for body composition analysis using deep learning. Radiology. 2019;290:669-679.
Not in our library10.1148/radiol.2018181432
- 61.
Ding, J., Li, A., Hu, Z. & Wang, L. in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2017 559–567 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).
Not in our library
- 62.
Tan LK, Liew YM, Lim E, McLaughlin RA. Convolutional neural network regression for short-axis left ventricle segmentation in cardiac cine MR sequences. Med. Image Anal. 2017;39:78-86.
Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2017.04.002
- 63.
Zhang, J. et al. Viral pneumonia screening on chest X-ray images using confidence-aware anomaly detection. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12338 (2020).
Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2020.3040950
- 64.
Zhang, X., Feng, C., Wang, A., Yang, L. & Hao, Y. CT super-resolution using multiple dense residual block based GAN. J. VLSI Signal Process. Syst. Signal Image Video Technol., 10.1007/s11760-020-01790-5 (2020).
Not in our library
- 65.
Papolos A, Narula J, Bavishi C, Chaudhry FA, Sengupta PPUS. Hospital use of echocardiography: insights from the nationwide inpatient sample. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016;67:502-511.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.090
- 66.
HeartFlowNXT—HeartFlow Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using Coronary CT Angiography—Study Results—ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01757678.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcct.2013.09.003
- 67.
- 68.
Zhang J, et al. Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation in clinical practice. Circulation. 2018;138:1623-1635.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.118.034338
- 69.
- 70.
- 71.
Perkins C, Balma D, Garcia R. Members of the Consensus Group & Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Why current breast pathology practices must be evaluated. A Susan G. Komen for the Cure white paper: June 2006. Breast J. 2007;13:443-447.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00463.x
- 72.
Brimo F, Schultz L, Epstein JI. The value of mandatory second opinion pathology review of prostate needle biopsy interpretation before radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2010;184:126-130.
Not in our library10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.021
- 73.
Elmore JG, et al. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA. 2015;313:1122-1132.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2015.1405
- 74.
Evans AJ, et al. US food and drug administration approval of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis: a key milestone is reached and new questions are raised. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2018;142:1383-1387.
Not in our library10.5858/arpa.2017-0496-cp
- 75.
Srinidhi, C. L., Ciga, O. & Martel, A. L. Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A survey. Medical Image Analysis. p. 101813 (2020).
Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2020.101813
- 76.
Bera K, Schalper KA, Rimm DL, Velcheti V, Madabhushi A. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019;16:703-715.
Not in our library10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y
- 77.
Cireşan, D. C., Giusti, A., Gambardella, L. M. & Schmidhuber, J. in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2013 411–418 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013).
Not in our library10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_51
- 78.
Wang H, et al. Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features. J. Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014;1:034003.
Not in our library10.1117/1.jmi.1.3.034003
- 79.
Kashif, M. N., Ahmed Raza, S. E., Sirinukunwattana, K., Arif, M. & Rajpoot, N. Handcrafted features with convolutional neural networks for detection of tumor cells in histology images. In 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 1029–1032 (IEEE, 2016).
Not in our library
- 80.
Wang, D., Khosla, A., Gargeya, R., Irshad, H. & Beck, A. H. Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05718 (2016).
Not in our library
- 81.
BenTaieb, A. & Hamarneh, G. in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2016 460–468 (Springer International Publishing, 2016).
Not in our library
- 82.
Chen H, et al. DCAN: Deep contour-aware networks for object instance segmentation from histology images. Med. Image Anal. 2017;36:135-146.
Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2016.11.004
- 83.
Xu Y, et al. Gland instance segmentation using deep multichannel neural networks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2017;64:2901-2912.
Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2017.2649485
- 84.
- 85.
Coudray N, et al. Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1559-1567.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5
- 86.
Campanella G, et al. Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1301-1309.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1
- 87.
Mobadersany P, et al. Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018;115:E2970-E2979.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1717139115
- 88.
Courtiol P, et al. Deep learning-based classification of mesothelioma improves prediction of patient outcome. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1519-1525.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-019-0583-3
- 89.
Rawat RR, et al. Deep learned tissue ‘fingerprints’ classify breast cancers by ER/PR/Her2 status from H&E images. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:7275.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-64156-4
- 90.
Dietterich TG, Lathrop RH, Lozano-Pérez T. Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artif. Intell. 1997;89:31-71.
Not in our library10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00034-3
- 91.
Christiansen EM, et al. In silico labeling: predicting fluorescent labels in unlabeled images. Cell. 2018;173:792-803.e19.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.040
- 92.
Esteva A, Topol E. Can skin cancer diagnosis be transformed by AI? Lancet. 2019;394:1795.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32726-6
- 93.
Haenssle HA, et al. Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:1836-1842.
Not in our library10.1093/annonc/mdy166
- 94.
Brinker TJ, et al. Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. Eur. J. Cancer. 2019;113:47-54.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001
- 95.
Liu Y, et al. A deep learning system for differential diagnosis of skin diseases. Nat. Med. 2020;26:900-908.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0842-3
- 96.
Yap J, Yolland W, Tschandl P. Multimodal skin lesion classification using deep learning. Exp. Dermatol. 2018;27:1261-1267.
Not in our library10.1111/exd.13777
- 97.
Marchetti MA, et al. Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2018;78:270-277.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.016
- 98.
Li, Y. et al. Skin cancer detection and tracking using data synthesis and deep learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01074 (2016).
Not in our library
- 99.
Ting DSW, et al. Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019;103:167-175.
Not in our library10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313173
- 100.
- 101.
Keane P, Topol E. Reinventing the eye exam. Lancet. 2019;394:2141.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(19)33051-x
- 102.
De Fauw J, et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1342-1350.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6
- 103.
Kern C, et al. Implementation of a cloud-based referral platform in ophthalmology: making telemedicine services a reality in eye care. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020;104:312-317.
Not in our library10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314161
- 104.
Gulshan V, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402-2410.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2016.17216
- 105.
- 106.
Abràmoff MD, et al. Improved automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on a publicly available dataset through integration of deep learning. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:5200-5206.
Not in our library10.1167/iovs.16-19964
- 107.
Ting DSW, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning system for diabetic retinopathy and related eye diseases using retinal images from multiethnic populations with diabetes. JAMA. 2017;318:2211-2223.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2017.18152
- 108.
- 109.
Varadarajan AV, et al. Predicting optical coherence tomography-derived diabetic macular edema grades from fundus photographs using deep learning. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:130.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-019-13922-8
- 110.
Yim J, et al. Predicting conversion to wet age-related macular degeneration using deep learning. Nat. Med. 2020;26:892-899.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0867-7
- 111.
Li Z, et al. Efficacy of a deep learning system for detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy based on color fundus photographs. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1199-1206.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023
- 112.
Yousefi S, et al. Detection of longitudinal visual field progression in glaucoma using machine learning. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2018;193:71-79.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajo.2018.06.007
- 113.
Brown JM, et al. Automated diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using deep convolutional neural networks. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136:803-810.
Not in our library10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1934
- 114.
Poplin R, et al. Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2018;2:158-164.
Not in our library10.1038/s41551-018-0195-0
- 115.
Mitani A, et al. Detection of anaemia from retinal fundus images via deep learning. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020;4:18-27.
Not in our library10.1038/s41551-019-0487-z
- 116.
Sabanayagam C, et al. A deep learning algorithm to detect chronic kidney disease from retinal photographs in community-based populations. Lancet Digital Health. 2020;2:e295-e302.
Not in our library10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30063-7
- 117.
Maier-Hein L, et al. Surgical data science for next-generation interventions. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2017;1:691-696.
Not in our library10.1038/s41551-017-0132-7
- 118.
García-Peraza-Herrera, L. C. et al. ToolNet: Holistically-nested real-time segmentation of robotic surgical tools. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 5717–5722 (IEEE, 2017).
Not in our library
- 119.
Zia A, Sharma Y, Bettadapura V, Sarin EL, Essa I. Video and accelerometer-based motion analysis for automated surgical skills assessment. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2018;13:443-455.
Not in our library10.1007/s11548-018-1704-z
- 120.
Sarikaya D, Corso JJ, Guru KA. Detection and localization of robotic tools in robot-assisted surgery videos using deep neural networks for region proposal and detection. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2017;36:1542-1549.
Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2017.2665671
- 121.
Jin, A. et al. Tool detection and operative skill assessment in surgical videos using region-based convolutional neural networks. In 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 691–699 (IEEE, 2018).
Not in our library
- 122.
Twinanda AP, et al. EndoNet: a deep architecture for recognition tasks on laparoscopic videos. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2017;36:86-97.
Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2016.2593957
- 123.
Lin HC, Shafran I, Yuh D, Hager GD. Towards automatic skill evaluation: detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions. Comput. Aided Surg. 2006;11:220-230.
Not in our library10.3109/10929080600989189
- 124.
Khalid S, Goldenberg M, Grantcharov T, Taati B, Rudzicz F. Evaluation of deep learning models for identifying surgical actions and measuring performance. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020;3:e201664.
Not in our library10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1664
- 125.
Vassiliou MC, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am. J. Surg. 2005;190:107-113.
Not in our library10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004
- 126.
Jin Y, et al. SV-RCNet: Workflow recognition from surgical videos using recurrent convolutional network. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2018;37:1114-1126.
Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2017.2787657
- 127.
Padoy N, et al. Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow. Med. Image Anal. 2012;16:632-641.
Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2010.10.001
- 128.
Azari DP, et al. Modeling surgical technical skill using expert assessment for automated computer rating. Ann. Surg. 2019;269:574-581.
Not in our library10.1097/sla.0000000000002478
- 129.
Ma AJ, et al. Measuring patient mobility in the ICU using a novel noninvasive sensor. Crit. Care Med. 2017;45:630-636.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000002265
- 130.
Davoudi A, et al. Intelligent ICU for autonomous patient monitoring using pervasive sensing and deep learning. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:8020.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-44004-w
- 131.
Chakraborty, I., Elgammal, A. & Burd, R. S. Video based activity recognition in trauma resuscitation. In 2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG) 1–8 (IEEE, 2013).
Not in our library
- 132.
Twinanda AP, Alkan EO, Gangi A, de Mathelin M, Padoy N. Data-driven spatio-temporal RGBD feature encoding for action recognition in operating rooms. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2015;10:737-747.
Not in our library10.1007/s11548-015-1186-1
- 133.
Kaplan RS, Porter ME. How to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011;89:46-52.
Not in our library
- 134.
Wang S, Chen L, Zhou Z, Sun X, Dong J. Human fall detection in surveillance video based on PCANet. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2016;75:11603-11613.
Not in our library10.1007/s11042-015-2698-y
- 135.
Núñez-Marcos, A., Azkune, G. & Arganda-Carreras, I. Vision-Based Fall Detection with Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proc. International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference 2017 (ACM, 2017).
Not in our library
- 136.
Luo, Z. et al. Computer vision-based descriptive analytics of seniors’ daily activities for long-term health monitoring. In Machine Learning for Healthcare (MLHC) 2 (JMLR, 2018).
Not in our library
- 137.
Zhang C, Tian Y. RGB-D camera-based daily living activity recognition. J. Comput. Vis. image Process. 2012;2:12.
Not in our library10.4018/ijcvip.2012040102
- 138.
Pirsiavash, H. & Ramanan, D. Detecting activities of daily living in first-person camera views. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2847–2854 (IEEE, 2012).
Not in our library
- 139.
Kishore, P. V. V., Prasad, M. V. D., Kumar, D. A. & Sastry, A. S. C. S. Optical flow hand tracking and active contour hand shape features for continuous sign language recognition with artificial neural networks. In 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC) 346–351 (IEEE, 2016).
Not in our library
- 140.
- 141.
Chen, W. & McDuff, D. Deepphys: video-based physiological measurement using convolutional attention networks. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 349–365 (Springer Science+Business Media, 2018).
Not in our library
- 142.
Moazzami B, Razavi-Khorasani N, Dooghaie Moghadam A, Farokhi E, Rezaei N. COVID-19 and telemedicine: Immediate action required for maintaining healthcare providers well-being. J. Clin. Virol. 2020;126:104345.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104345
- 143.
Gerke, S., Yeung, S. & Cohen, I. G. Ethical and legal aspects of ambient intelligence in hospitals. JAMA10.1001/jama.2019.21699 (2020).
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2019.21699
- 144.
Young AT, Xiong M, Pfau J, Keiser MJ, Wei ML. Artificial intelligence in dermatology: a primer. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2020;140:1504-1512.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.026
- 145.
Schaekermann, M., Cai, C. J., Huang, A. E. & Sayres, R. Expert discussions improve comprehension of difficult cases in medical image assessment. In Proc. 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–13 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020).
Not in our library
- 146.
Schaekermann M, et al. Remote tool-based adjudication for grading diabetic retinopathy. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2019;8:40.
Not in our library10.1167/tvst.8.6.40
- 147.
Caruana R. Multitask learning. Mach. Learn. 1997;28:41-75.
Not in our library10.1023/a:1007379606734
- 148.
- 149.
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A. & Zisserman, A. Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6034 (2013).
Not in our library
- 150.
Ren, J. et al. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (eds Wallach, H. et al.) 14707–14718 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019).
Not in our library
- 151.
Dusenberry, M. W. et al. Analyzing the role of model uncertainty for electronic health records. In Proc. ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning 204–213 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020).
Not in our library
- 152.
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366:447-453.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aax2342
- 153.
- 154.
- 155.
- 156.
McKinney SM, et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577:89-94.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6
- 157.
Kamulegeya, L. H. et al. Using artificial intelligence on dermatology conditions in Uganda: a case for diversity in training data sets for machine learning. 10.1101/826057 (2019).
Not in our library10.4314/ahs.v23i2.86
Cited by papers we hold 4
- WaveAttention-ResNet: a deep learning-based intelligent diagnostic model for the auxiliary diagnosis of multiple retinal diseases · 2025Not checked
- Large language models encode clinical knowledge · 2023Corrected
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Assisted Biomedical Systems for Intelligent Healthcare · 2022No notice
- Expert-level detection of pathologies from unannotated chest X-ray images via self-supervised learning · 2022No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.