Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Rising Canadian and falling Swedish radon gas exposure as a consequence of 20th to 21st century residential build practices

Selim M. Khan, Dustin D. Pearson, Tryggve Rönnqvist and 3 more

Scientific Reports · 2021

doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96928-x (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Radioactive radon gas inhalation is a major cause of lung cancer worldwide and is a consequence of the built environment. The average radon level of properties built in a given period (their ‘innate radon risk’) varies over time and by region, although the underlying reasons for these differences are unclear. To investigate this, we analyzed long term radon tests and buildings from 25,489 Canadian to 38,596 Swedish residential properties constructed after 1945. While Canadian and Swedish properties built from 1970 to 1980s are comparable (96–103 Bq/m 3 ), innate radon risks subsequently diverge, rising in Canada and falling in Sweden such that Canadian houses built in the 2010–2020s have 467% greater radon (131 Bq/m 3 ) versus Swedish equivalents (28 Bq/m 3 ). These trends are consistent across distinct building types, and regional subdivisions. The introduction of energy efficiency measures (such as heat recovery ventilation) within each nation’s build codes are independent of radon fluctuations over time. Deep learning-based models forecast that (without intervention) the average Canadian residential radon level will increase to 176 Bq/m 3 by 2050. Provisions in the 2010 Canada Build Code have not significantly reduced innate radon risks, highlighting the urgency of novel code interventions to achieve systemic radon reduction and cancer prevention in Canada.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

References48

    40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    All 48 references

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.