Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing

Abstract

Spending time in natural environments can benefit health and well-being, but exposure-response relationships are under-researched. We examined associations between recreational nature contact in the last seven days and self-reported health and well-being. Participants (n = 19,806) were drawn from the Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Survey (2014/15–2015/16); weighted to be nationally representative. Weekly contact was categorised using 60 min blocks. Analyses controlled for residential greenspace and other neighbourhood and individual factors. Compared to no nature contact last week, the likelihood of reporting good health or high well-being became significantly greater with contact ≥120 mins (e.g. 120–179 mins: ORs [95%CIs]: Health = 1.59 [1.31–1.92]; Well-being = 1.23 [1.08–1.40]). Positive associations peaked between 200–300 mins per week with no further gain. The pattern was consistent across key groups including older adults and those with long-term health issues. It did not matter how 120 mins of contact a week was achieved (e.g. one long vs . several shorter visits/week). Prospective longitudinal and intervention studies are a critical next step in developing possible weekly nature exposure guidelines comparable to those for physical activity.

References 59

1. 1.

   Hartig T, Kahn PH. Living in cities, naturally. Science. 2016;352:938-940.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.aaf3759

2. 2.
   Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center · 2015

   No notice
3. 3.

   Halonen JI, et al. Green and blue areas as predictors of overweight and obesity in an 8‐year follow‐up study. Obesity. 2014;22:1910-1917.

   Not in our library10.1002/oby.20772

4. 4.

   Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Kolt GS. Is neighborhood green space associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes? Evidence from 267,072 Australians. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:197-201.

   Not in our library10.2337/dc13-1325

5. 5.

   Alcock I, et al. Land cover and air pollution are associated with asthma hospitalisations: A cross-sectional study. Environ Int. 2017;109:29-41.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.009

6. 6.

   Mitchell RJ, Richardson EA, Shortt NK, Pearce JR. Neighborhood environments and socioeconomic inequalities in mental well-being. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:80-84.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.017

7. 7.

   Gascon M, et al. Residential green spaces and mortality: a systematic review. Environ Int. 2016;86:60-67.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.013

8. 8.

   Wood SL, et al. Exploring the relationship between childhood obesity and proximity to the coast: A rural/urban perspective. Health Place. 2016;40:129-136.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.05.010

9. 9.

   Dadvand P, et al. Green spaces and spectacles use in schoolchildren in Barcelona. Environ Res. 2017;152:256-262.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2016.10.026

10. 10.
    Surrounding Greenness and Pregnancy Outcomes in Four Spanish Birth Cohorts · 2012

    No notice
11. 11.

    Dadvand P, et al. Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. PNAS. 2015;112:7937-7942.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1503402112

12. 12.

    Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, De Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P. Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Commun H. 2006;60:587-592.

    Not in our library10.1136/jech.2005.043125

13. 13.

    Mitchell R, Popham F. Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England. J Epidemiol Commun H. 2007;61:681-683.

    Not in our library10.1136/jech.2006.053553

14. 14.

    Seresinhe, C. I., Preis, T. & Moat, H. S. Quantifying the impact of scenic environments on health. Sci Rep, 5, 10.1038/srep16899 (2015).

    Not in our library10.1038/srep16899

15. 15.

    White MP, Alcock I, Wheeler BW, Depledge MH. Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:920-928.

    Not in our library10.1177/0956797612464659

16. 16.

    Ekkel ED, de Vries S. Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape Urban Plan. 2017;157:214-220.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008

17. 17.

    Barton J, Pretty J. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:3947-3955.

    Not in our library10.1021/es903183r

18. 18.
    Health Benefits from Nature Experiences Depend on Dose · 2016

    No notice
19. 19.
    What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature? · 2013

    No notice
20. 20.

    Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H. Nature and health. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2014;35:207-228.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443

21. 21.

    Nutsford D, Pearson AL, Kingham S, Reitsma F. Residential exposure to visible blue space (but not green space) associated with lower psychological distress in a capital city. Health Place. 2016;39:70-78.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.03.002

22. 22.

    Grahn P, Stigsdotter UA. Landscape planning and stress. Urban For Urban Gree. 2003;2:1-18.

    Not in our library10.1078/1618-8667-00019

23. 23.

    Hillsdon M, Coombes E, Griew P, Jones A. An assessment of the relevance of the home neighbourhood for understanding environmental influences on physical activity: how far from home do people roam? Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2015;12:100.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12966-015-0260-y

24. 24.

    Sijtsma FJ, de Vries S, van Hinsberg A, Diederiks J. Does ‘grey’ urban living lead to more ‘green’ holiday nights? A Netherlands Case Study. Landscape Urban Plan. 2012;105:250-257.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.021

25. 25.

    Cox DT, et al. Doses of nearby nature simultaneously associated with multiple health benefits. Int J Environ Res Pub He. 2017;14:172.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijerph14020172

26. 26.

    Flowers EP, Freeman P, Gladwell VF. A cross-sectional study examining predictors of visit frequency to local green space and the impact this has on physical activity levels. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:420.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12889-016-3050-9

27. 27.

    Shanahan DF, Fuller RA, Bush R, Lin BB, Gaston KJ. The health benefits of urban nature: how much do we need? Bioscience. 2015;65:476-485.

    Not in our library10.1093/biosci/biv032

28. 28.
    Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda · 2017

    No notice
29. 29.

    Haskell WL, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116:1081-93.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.107.185649

30. 30.

    Astell-Burt T, Mitchell R, Hartig T. The association between green space and mental health varies across the lifecourse. A longitudinal study. J Epidemiol Commun H. 2014;68:578-583.

    Not in our library10.1136/jech-2013-203767

31. 31.

    Richardson EA, Mitchell R. Gender differences in relationships between urban green space and health in the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:568-575.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.015

32. 32.

    Gentin S. Outdoor recreation and ethnicity in. Europe—A review. Urban For Urban Gree. 2011;10:153-161.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ufug.2011.05.002

33. 33.

    Mitchell R, Popham F. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet. 2008;372:1655-1660.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61689-x

34. 34.

    White MP, et al. Recreational physical activity in natural environments and implications for health: A population based cross-sectional study in England. Prev Med. 2016;91:383-388.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.023

35. 35.

    Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environ Health Prev. 2010;15:18-26.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12199-009-0086-9

36. 36.

    Thompson Coon J, et al. Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environ Sci Tech. 2011;45:1761-1772.

    Not in our library10.1021/es102947t

37. 37.

    Cimprich B, Ronis DL. An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26:284-292.

    Not in our library10.1097/00002820-200308000-00005

38. 38.

    Ward Thompson C, et al. More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape Urban Plan. 2012;105:221-229.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015

39. 39.

    Doherty ST, Lemieux CJ, Canally C. Tracking human activity and well-being in natural environments using wearable sensors and experience sampling. Soc Sci Med. 2014;106:83-92.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.048

40. 40.
    Patterns of GPS measured time outdoors after school and objective physical activity in English children: the PEACH project · 2010

    No notice

Cited by papers we hold 11

• A mixed-methods exploration of virtual reality as a tool to promote green exercise · 2022
  Not checked
• SOME BENEFICIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN NATURE – QUESTIONS ARISING FROM THE NARRATIVE REVIEW · 2021
  Not checked
• Assessing Inequalities in Wellbeing at a Neighbourhood Scale in Low-Middle-Income-Country Secondary Cities and Their Implications for Long-Term Livability · 2021
  Not checked
• Biophilia as Evolutionary Adaptation: An Onto- and Phylogenetic Framework for Biophilic Design · 2021
  Not checked
• Moving Beyond Disciplinary Silos Towards a Transdisciplinary Model of Wellbeing: An Invited Review · 2021
  Not checked
• Associations between Nature Exposure and Health: A Review of the Evidence · 2021
  No notice
• Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis · 2021
  No notice
• Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries · 2021
  No notice
• Perceived contributions of multifunctional landscapes to human well‐being: Evidence from 13 European sites · 2020
  Not checked
• Psychological impacts of “screen time” and “green time” for children and adolescents: A systematic scoping review · 2020
  No notice
• COVID-19 Lockdown: Housing Built Environment’s Effects on Mental Health · 2020
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.