Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

Multimodal and Multiscale Deep Neural Networks for the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease using structural MR and FDG-PET images

Donghuan Lu, Karteek Popuri, Gavin Weiguang Ding and 97 more

Scientific Reports · 2018 · arXiv licence (no reuse)

doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22871-z

Abstract

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease where biomarkers for disease based on pathophysiology may be able to provide objective measures for disease diagnosis and staging. Neuroimaging scans acquired from MRI and metabolism images obtained by FDG-PET provide in-vivo measurements of structure and function (glucose metabolism) in a living brain. It is hypothesized that combining multiple different image modalities providing complementary information could help improve early diagnosis of AD. In this paper, we propose a novel deep-learning-based framework to discriminate individuals with AD utilizing a multimodal and multiscale deep neural network. Our method delivers 82.4% accuracy in identifying the individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who will convert to AD at 3 years prior to conversion (86.4% combined accuracy for conversion within 1–3 years), a 94.23% sensitivity in classifying individuals with clinical diagnosis of probable AD, and a 86.3% specificity in classifying non-demented controls improving upon results in published literature.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 47

  1. 1.

    Association A, et al. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s & dementia: journal Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2011;7:208.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jalz.2011.02.004

  2. 2.

    Petersen RC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Arch. neurology. 2009;66:1447-1455.

    Not in our library10.1001/archneurol.2009.266

  3. 3.

    Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, Arrighi HM. Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & dementia. 2007;3:186-191.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381

  4. 4.

    Davatzikos C, Bhatt P, Shaw LM, Batmanghelich KN, Trojanowski JQ. Prediction of MCI to AD conversion, via MRI, CSF biomarkers, and pattern classification. Neurobiol. aging. 2011;32:2322-e19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.05.023

  5. 5.

    Landau SM, et al. Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI. Neurobiol. aging. 2011;32:1207-1218.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.07.002

  6. 6.

    Farhan, S., Fahiem, M. A. & Tauseef, H. An ensemble-of-classifiers based approach for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Classification using structural features of brain images. Comput. and mathematical methods medicine2014 (2014).

    Not in our library10.1155/2014/862307

  7. 7.

    Korolev, S., Safiullin, A., Belyaev, M. & Dodonova, Y. Residual and Plain Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Brain MRI Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06643 (2017).

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Payan, A. & Montana, G. Predicting Alzheimer’s disease: a neuroimaging study with 3D convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.02506 (2015).

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Eskildsen SF, et al. Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the ADNI cohort using patterns of cortical thinning. Neuroimage. 2013;65:511-521.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.058

  10. 10.

    Misra C, Fan Y, Davatzikos C. Baseline and longitudinal patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, and their use in prediction of short-term conversion to AD: results from ADNI. Neuroimage. 2009;44:1415-1422.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.031

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Cuingnet R, et al. Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer’s disease from structural MRI: a comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database. Neuroimage. 2011;56:766-781.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.013

  13. 13.

    Cho Y, et al. Individual subject classification for Alzheimer’s disease based on incremental learning using a spatial frequency representation of cortical thickness data. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2217-2230.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.085

  14. 14.

    Mosconi L, et al. Pre-clinical detection of Alzheimer’s disease using FDG-PET, with or without amyloid imaging. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2010;20:843-854.

    Not in our library10.3233/jad-2010-091504

  15. 15.

    Gray KR, et al. Multi-region analysis of longitudinal FDG-PET for the classification of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage. 2012;60:221-229.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.071

  16. 16.

    Toussaint P-J, et al. Resting state FDG-PET functional connectivity as an early biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease using conjoint univariate and independent component analyses. Neuroimage. 2012;63:936-946.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.091

  17. 17.

    Illán I, et al. 18 F-FDG PET imaging analysis for computer aided Alzheimer’s diagnosis. Inf. Sci. 2011;181:903-916.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ins.2010.10.027

  18. 18.

    Young J, et al. Accurate multimodal probabilistic prediction of conversion to Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage: Clin. 2013;2:735-745.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.004

  19. 19.

    Zhang D, et al. Multimodal classification of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage. 2011;55:856-867.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.008

  20. 20.

    Moradi E, et al. Machine learning framework for early MRI-based Alzheimer’s conversion prediction in MCI subjects. Neuroimage. 2015;104:398-412.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.002

  21. 21.
  22. 22.

    Ye J, et al. Sparse learning and stability selection for predicting MCI to AD conversion using baseline ADNI data. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:46.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2377-12-46

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Zhang D, et al. Multi-modal multi-task learning for joint prediction of multiple regression and classification variables in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage. 2012;59:895-907.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.069

  25. 25.

    Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 1097–1105 (2012).

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Liu S, et al. Multimodal neuroimaging feature learning for multiclass diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. IEEE Transactions on Biomed. Eng. 2015;62:1132-1140.

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2014.2372011

  27. 27.

    Liu, S. et al. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease with deep learning. In Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on, 1015–1018 (IEEE, 2014).

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Suk H-I, et al. Hierarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis. NeuroImage. 2014;101:569-582.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077

  29. 29.

    Zhang, W., Zelinsky, G. & Samaras, D. Real-time accurate object detection using multiple resolutions. In Computer Vision, 2007. ICCV 2007. IEEE 11th International Conference on, 1–8 (IEEE, 2007).

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Lowe DG. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. journal computer vision. 2004;60:91-110.

    Not in our library10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94

  31. 31.

    Tang, Y. & Mohamed, A.-R. Multiresolution Deep Belief Networks. In AISTATS, 1203–1211 (2012).

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Dale AM, S. M, Fischl B. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 1999;9(2):195-207.

    Not in our library10.1006/nimg.1998.0395

  33. 33.

    Raamana PR, et al. Thickness network features for prognostic applications in dementia. Neurobiol. aging. 2015;36:S91-S102.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.05.040

  34. 34.

    Beg F, Miller M, Trouvé A, Younes L. Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int. journal computer vision. 2005;61(2):139-157.

    Not in our library10.1023/b:visi.0000043755.93987.aa

  35. 35.

    Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002;17:825-841.

    Not in our library10.1006/nimg.2002.1132

  36. 36.

    Bengio Y, et al. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. Adv. neural information processing systems. 2007;19:153.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Kingma, D. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Bengio, Y. Practical recommendations for gradient-based training of deep architectures. In Neural networks: Tricks of the trade, 437–478 (Springer, 2012).

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Srivastava N, Hinton GE, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014;15:1929-1958.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Liu, K., Chen, K., Yao, L. & Guo, X. Prediction of Mild Cognitive Impairment Conversion Using a Combination of Independent Component Analysis and the Cox Model. Front. human neuroscience11 (2017).

    Not in our library10.3389/fnhum.2017.00033

All 47 references

Cited by papers we hold 12

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.