No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
A Novel Indication for Panobinostat as a Senolytic Drug in NSCLC and HNSCC
Leleesha Samaraweera, Alfred Adomako, Alicia Rodriguez-Gabin and 1 more
Scientific Reports · 2017 · CC BY
doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01964-1
Abstract
Panobinostat (pano) is an FDA-approved histone deacetylase inhibitor. There is interest in evaluating alternate dosing schedules and novel combinations of pano for the treatment of upper aerodigestive and lung malignancies; thus we evaluated it in combination with Taxol, a chemotherapeutic with activity in both diseases. Dose-dependent synergy was observed in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines and was due to senescence rather than potentiation of cell death. Senescence occurred following cisplatin- or Taxol-treatment in cell lines from both cancer types and was associated with decreased histone 3 (H3) acetylation and increased Bcl-xL expression: the latter a biomarker of senescence and target of anti-senescence therapeutics, or senolytics. Since H3 acetylation and Bcl-xL expression were altered in senescence, we subsequently evaluated pano as a senolytic in chemotherapy-treated cancer cells enriched for senescent cells. Pano caused cell death at significantly higher rates compared to repeat dosing with chemotherapy. This was associated with decreased expression of Bcl-xL and increased acetylated H3, reversing the expression patterns observed in senescence. These data support evaluating pano as a post-chemotherapy senolytic with the potential to kill persistent senescent cells that accumulate during standard chemotherapy in NSCLC and HNSCC.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Despite intense cisplain-based chemoradiotherapy,, the majority of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) patients have short disease-free survival and quickly succumb to metastatic disease; therefore there is a need to evaluate novel combinations to evolve treatment modalities that can extend survival. Although taxotere is FDA-approved for the treatment of HNSCC, the role of Taxol in the disease has not been fully evaluated in these therapeutically recalcitrant malignancies.
Histone deacetylases (HDAC) remove acetyl groups in the lysine residues of histones and non-histone proteins and thus regulate important cellular functions including gene expression, differentiation, proliferation and survival,. Aberrant expression and mutation of HDACs have been documented in various malignancies, prompting the development of therapeutic inhibitors, some of which are FDA-approved for the treatment of refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma,. Panobinostat (pano) is a class I, II and IV HDAC inhibitor (HDACi) that is FDA-approved for the treatment of refractory Multiple myeloma. HDACi’s, including pano, have also been evaluated in early phase clinical studies for the treatment of both HNSCC and NSCLC–. Despite evidence of promising anti-tumor activity, particularly in combination with other epigenetic modulators, toxicity remains a therapeutic challenge. Thus continued development and evaluation of novel pano combinations is required.
Here we explore the efficacy of pano in combination with Taxol in HNSCC and NSCLC, and show synergistic proliferative arrest via induction of senescence. Subsequently, we extend these studies to evaluate the efficacy of single-agent pano as a post-chemotherapy senolytic therapy that causes senescent cell death and is more efficacious than retreating cancer cells with successive cycles of chemotherapy.
The Combination of Taxol and Pano is Synergistic in NSCLC and HNSCC Cells
Dose-response curves for the concurrent combination of Taxol and pano indicate a shift to the left (consistent with either additivity or synergy) in both A549 (NSCLC) and FaDu (HNSCC) cell lines (Fig. 1A and B). Subsequent analysis using the Combination Index (CI) method of Chou and Talalay, an algorithm that predicts the nature and potency of drug combinations, indicate synergy in both A549 and FaDu cells (Fig. 1C and D). Similar data were obtained for other NSCLC and HNSCC cell lines (Table 1). We further evaluated the effect of drug sequencing on the interaction of Taxol and pano and determined that synergy was schedule-dependent in A549 and FaDu cells. Specifically, Taxol given prior to pano for 24 h was superior to the reverse sequence that caused pharmacologic antagonism (Fig. 1C and D). Mechanistically, pano is thought to function by inducing a G2 block, which may provide an explanation for the observed antagonism when pano is given prior to Taxol.
The synergy observed at low doses of combined drugs was associated with suppression of proliferation, evident as decreased expression of PCNA (Fig. 1E). Potentiation of cell death was not apparent in the combination treatment, as evidenced by p89-PARP immunblotting (Fig. 1E), or caspase activity (Fig. 1F), although Taxol alone demonstrated some cell kill activity.
The Concurrent Combination of Taxol and Pano Induces Senescence
Chemotherapy can result in an array of cell fates, including cell death; however the time for these fates to emerge is often delayed. Thus, the observation time following treatment was extended to clarify the long-term effect of concurrent pano and Taxol treatment. Cells treated with Taxol, pano and their combination were assayed for proliferation over 12 days to evaluate the long-term effects on cell fate. Single agents induced proliferative arrest in both cell lines, confirming the immunoblotting data shown in Fig. 1E. Analysis comparing the effect of either Taxol, or pano on proliferation at day 8 indicated statistically significant differences relative to vehicle-only treated cells (P = 0.0127 and 0.0131 for pano and Taxol, respectively in A549: and P day 8 < 0.0001 for both pano and Taxol in FaDu). This effect was transient however, and proliferation resumed after 4–6 days (Fig. 2A and B). In contrast, cells treated with the concurrent combination remained growth arrested for the duration of the experiment and for at least 4 weeks afterward.
Since senescence is a form of proliferative arrest distinct from quiescence, and is associated with the Senescence Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP), we evaluated SASP transcription coupled with senescence-associated β-gal (SA-β-gal) activity, another commonly used assay for detecting senescence. Cells treated with single agents or the combination for 6 days had increased mRNA expression of SASP-related factors, coupled with decreased expression of CyclinA2 indicating a transcriptional signature consistent with senescence (Fig. 2C and D). Furthermore, almost all combination-treated A549 cells exhibited a flattened, granular morphology coupled with SA-β-gal positive staining (Fig. 2E). Single agents induced varying degrees of SA- β-gal positivity in localized regions, consistent with the transient growth arrest observed for single agents (Fig. 2A). The SA-β-gal assay was not informative for FaDu cells under these conditions. Thus, the concurrent combination of Taxol and pano causes prolonged proliferative arrest that is due to a high frequency of a stable senescent phenotype.
Senescence is a Common Outcome of Cisplatin or Taxol Treatment in NSCLC and HNSCC
NSCLC and HNSCC cells were treated for 10 days with concentrations of cisplatin (CDDP) and Taxol typically associated with initial plasma concentrations in patients. We have established that these doses cause maximal tumor cell death. The extended treatment time was critical to eliminate cells undergoing delayed death and therefore to enrich for surviving residual cells. These surviving populations were enriched for senescent cells, as measured by SA-β-gal positivity and characteristic morphology (Fig. 3A and Fig. S1), and transactivation of SASP-related factors (Fig. 3B). Although the response was heterogeneous between cell lines and drug treatments, senescent cells were present throughout. Thus, chemotherapy-induced senescence (CIS) is a common outcome in NSCLC and HNSCC cell lines.
Characterizing CIS Populations
Senescence is a tumor suppressive mechanism; however, in aging and certain diseases senescent cells accumulate due to impaired immune-mediated clearance. These findings have led to debate about the potential risks of senescent-enriched tumor populations and the elevated and prolonged inflammatory signaling that ensues. Research focused on eliminating persistent senescent cells is an area of intense focus in aging and cancer therapeutics. This strategy has shown promise in transgenic mouse model studies, and using therapeutic interventions that induce senescent cell death, termed “Senolytics”,. Several drugs have been repurposed as senolytics, and the Bcl-2 family of proteins that are often overexpressed in senescent cells, are considered valid senolytic targets,. We evaluated the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL in CIS and found increased expression of Bcl-xL in all cell lines, suggesting an association with senescence survival (Fig. 3C). Bcl-2 was not expressed in these cells.
Senescence has been shown to be associated with decreased global histone acetylation. Pano treatment has been shown to increase Histone 3 (H3) acetylation and has been used as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for HDACi’s in clinical trial; therefore, we evaluated whether CIS populations had altered H3 acetylation. Decreased acetylation was observed across all CIS populations evaluated (Fig. 3C). HDACi’s have also been shown to modulate the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins including Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL–, therefore we evaluated pano as a senolytic therapy to eliminate CIS, and monitored acetylated H3 in these populations as a surrogate for drug effect.
Pano has Senolytic Activity in CIS and is More Efficacious than Repeat Dosing of Chemotherapy
NSCLC and HNSCC patients are treated with repeated cycles of chemotherapy as standard of care; however, the effect of repeated doses of chemotherapy on tumor cell death, whether in proliferating or non-proliferating (senescent) cells, is largely unknown. Thus, we evaluated the ability of a 2nd dose of chemotherapy to kill residual CIS populations that become enriched after a first cycle of chemotherapy. In contrast, we also evaluated pano as an intervention therapy with potential to kill senescent cancer cells when given instead of a 2nd cycle of chemotherapy. The schema is summarized in Fig. 4A. Since both CDDP and Taxol are used as first-line treatment in NSCLC, senescent cell populations derived from either drug were used. Optimization experiments indicated a dose-dependent effect of pano in CIS populations (Fig. S2). Based on these data 200 nM pano was chosen as the optimal dose to test senolytic activity.
Pano treatment resulted in dramatic cell loss in CIS populations, as shown by the representative images in Fig. 4B and C. Quantitation indicated a significant decrease in the number of adherent senescent cells remaining, as shown in Fig. 4D and E. Pano-mediated cell loss was time-dependent (Fig. 4B–E) and importantly significantly outperformed either CDDP or Taxol retreatment (unpaired t-test, P < 0.001)(Fig. 4D and E). Of note, CDDP-derived CIS populations were sensitive to retreatment with a 2nd cycle of CDDP, while Taxol-derived CIS populations were largely resistant to retreatment with Taxol (Fig. 4B–E). Thus, we conclude that pano has high senolytic activity.
Pano-mediated cell loss was associated with increased caspase 3/7 activity (Fig. 4F) and p89-PARP cleavage (Fig. 4G) confirming cell death, and also with decreased expression of Bcl-xL. This was more evident after 3 days in both CIS populations (Fig. 4G). Increased H3 acetylation was also observed following pano treatment, reversing the decreased trend observed in CIS.
Pano Treatment Shows Senolytic Activity in Other CIS NSCLC and HNSCC Cells
We further evaluated the effect of pano on CIS populations derived from one additional NSCLC (H460) and two HNSCC cell lines (UMSCC and FaDu). Consistent with the findings reported for A549, pano treatment significantly outperformed either CDDP or Taxol retreatment (Fig. 5A–F). Similarly, CDDP-derived CIS populations were somewhat sensitive to retreatment with a 2nd cycle of CDDP (Fig. 5A,C and E), while Taxol-derived CIS populations were largely resistant to repeat dosing with Taxol (Fig. 5B,D and F). Pano-induced loss in CIS H460 NSCLC cells was associated with increased caspase 3/7 activity (Fig. 5G) indicating cell death; however the assay was not informative for UMSCC47 or FaDu cells, although cell detachment was evident. Immunoblotting of pano-treated UMSCC47 CIS populations did confirm PARP cleavage (Fig. S3). Similiar to A549 NSCLC, pano-mediated senolytic activity in UMSCC47 was associated with decreased Bcl-xL expression and increased H3 acetylation, indicating reproducible reversal of expression patterns observed in CIS. Thus, both Bcl-xL expression andH3 acetylation may be explored further as pharmacodynamic biomarkers of pano senolytic activity in CIS.
Discussion
While other reports of synergy between HDACi’s and taxanes have been described–, this is the first study to determine that the mechanistic basis underlying this interaction is senescence and not potentiation of cell death. We further show that senescence is a major fate in NSCLC and HNSCC cancer cells that survive CDDP or Taxol therapy.
Although senescence limits cancer development and promotes tissue repair in young organisms, accumulation of senescent cells in aged tissue imparts risk for several reasons. Senescent cells can revert and form genomically defective daughter cells that have the potential to subsequently evolve into dysplastic cells,. Additionally, persistent SASP secretions from senescent populations may influence autocrine and paracrine signaling within the tumor microenvironment and negatively influence disease progression and immune surveillance,. Therefore, research efforts have recently focused on identifying and characterizing senolytic drugs for use in aging-related pathologies with obvious applications to cancer therapeutics. We demonstrate here that pano can be repurposed as a senolytic drug that kills persistent senescent cancer cells that arise post-Taxol or -CDDP therapy.
Cellular targets of interest for senolytic drug development include ephrins (EFNB1 or 3), PI3KCD, p21, BCL-xL, and plasminogen-activated inhibitor-2. Drugs that specifically target the BH3 domain of Bcl-2 family proteins have validated senolytic activity in non-transformed cells that have undergone replicative senescence. Consistent with these findings, we observed increased Bcl-xL expression in CIS cells that was reversed upon treatment with pano, and was associated with cell death. Other reports have documented HDACi-mediated reduction of Bcl-xL expression,, shown to be due to histone deacetylation close to Bcl-xL transcription start sites, resulting in inhibition of transcription. Similar to other reports, we also show that CIS populations have reduced histone acetylation (using H3 as a biomarker), and as expected, pano reversed this phenomenon. Aside from the effect of pano on Bcl-xL specifically, it is plausible that pano modulates the expression of other genes critical for the survival of senescent cells, although this hypothesis remains to be tested.
HDACi monotherapy has poor clinical activity; however, in combination with cytotoxic drugs and/or epigenetic modulators, anti-tumor efficacy has been noted in patients with solid tumors, as reviewed. Despite encouraging activity, hematologic and other toxicities associated with HDACi combinations remain a challenge; therefore further evaluation of novel scheduling regimens is required. A review of existing clinical data indicate that trials of HDACi-containing combinatorial regimens predominately explored continuous dosing schedules resulting in a wide range of responses, but with considerable toxicity. This continuous-type dosing of HDACi’s in clinical trial makes it challenging to decipher the true impact of sequencing, or intermittent scheduling on either clinical response rate, or toxicity. Repurposing pano as a senolytic would require short-term, sequential dosing following chemotherapy to target senescent cells within the residual tumor. Further, novel dosing strategies for pano-based therapy that exploit intermittent-type treatment should be explored. Several studies of HDACi’s that demonstrated promising clinical response, used valproic acid, a drug that has a favorable toxicity profile, although these observations were limited to breast cancer patients suggesting a potential pharmacogenomic association.
These studies bring attention to two important topics relevant to cancer treatment. Firstly, it is largely assumed that cytotoxic drugs primarily target proliferating cells, although this dogma has been called into question since many slow proliferating tumors have an excellent response to chemotherapy; known as the ‘proliferation rate paradox’. One hypothesis to account for this observation is that some cytotoxic drugs can target growth-arrested cancer cells, such as quiescent or senescent phenotypes. Indeed we demonstrate that CDDP has a cytotoxic effect on senescent cancer cells while Taxol did not. Thus it is conceivable that some cytotoxic drugs target senescent cells and thereby possess intrinsic senolytic activity. This may partially account for the clinical activity and ‘success’ of some cytotoxic agents. While this is a noteworthy observation, the senolytic efficacy of pano is notably superior to CDDP.
Secondly, there needs to be a deeper appreciation that senescence is a clinically relevant outcome of therapy. It is unclear at present if immune cell effectors can clear senescence cancer cells that arise following chemotherapy; therefore senescence should be regarded as a component of residual disease and thus, a clinically relevant contributor to therapeutic resistance. Identifying and quantifying senescence in human tumors is technically challenging and there are few published studies, due to a lack of senescence-specific biomarkers amenable to analysis using fresh or formalin-fixed tissue. Until this problem is adequately resolved, quantitation of ‘senescence tumor burden’ and subsequent correlation with survival cannot be thoroughly investigated. The ideal scenario for the rational evaluation of pano and other senolytic drugs should involve determination of pre- and post-chemotherapy senescence tumor burden that can be used to select patients most likely to benefit most from a post-chemotherapy senolytic intervention.
Drug Interaction Studies
Triplicate sets of 96-well plates were set up for treatment with Taxol, or pano alone and the concurrent combination where both drugs were combined at their equipotent molar ratio (a fixed ratio of the respective IC50). Six replicates were used for each drug dose evaluated, and 9 dose levels evaluated. See supplemental methods regarding experimental detail for the generation of dose-response curves. After incubation for 3 cell doublings (3–5 days), plates were processed using Sulforhodamine B (SRB), and data were input into the software Calcusyn (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK) to compute the nature of drug interaction using the method of Chou and Talalay. Data were expressed as a combination index (CI) ratio; whereby CI < 1 indicate synergy, CI = 1 is additivity, and CI > 1 indicate antagonism. For drug sequencing experiments, plates were set up in the same way, but for combination treatments, drugs were added sequentially (by exposing to one drug for 24 h, aspirated and replaced with the other drug for an additional 72 h). Taxol and pano-alone controls were also modified for these experiments, whereby single agents were administered for 24 h or 72 h only. All experiments were repeated at least 3 x.
Cell Proliferation Assays
A549 and FaDu cells were plated in 96 well plates and treated the following day with low doses of Taxol (6.25 nM for A549 and 2.5 nM for FaDu), pano (25 nM for both cell lines), or the relative combination of both. Cell numbers were counted every 4 days until day 12, using a hemocytometer. Data were plotted relative to the initial number of cells seeded. Experiments were repeated three times.
Immunoblot analysis
Adherent and non-adherent cells were collected from drug-treated dishes and total protein extracted by Tris-SDS lysis buffer, quantified by Lowry and used for immunoblotting. Antibodies used in the study were rabbit anti-Bcl-xL (1:1000, #2764; Cell Signaling), mouse anti-Bcl-2 (1:500, Dako; #M0887), mouse anti-PCNA (1:2000,#MS106-PO; Neomarker), rabbit anti-p89-PARP (1:1000, #9541; Cell Signaling) and rabbit-anti-Acetyl-H3 (1:1000, #06-599; Millipore). Equal protein loading between lanes was confirmed by staining membranes with Ponceau S prior to immunoblotting.
Detection of Senescence
The senescence phenotype was evaluated using multiple assays including the senescence associated β-galactosidase assay; and mRNA expression of senescence-associated secretory (SASP) factors (IL6, CXCL1, IL8 and PAI-1), and cyclin A for proliferation.
Analysis of Cell Survival Following Pano or Cycle 2 Chemotherapy
CDDP- or Taxol-derived CIS populations (10 day old) were washed 2x with warm media to remove debris and subsequently treated with (i) vehicle, (ii) the same dose of cytotoxic drug used to generate each CIS populations (see supplemental methods), or (iii) pano (200 nM). Three and seven days later monolayers were washed with warm media, and any remaining cells stained by SRB. The SRB absorbance values for three-and seven-day drug treatments were calculated (mean ± SEM) of six replicates for each condition. Experiments were repeated a minimum of 3x.
References 44
- 1.
Zarogoulidis, K. et al. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Thorac Dis5 Suppl 4, S389–396, doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.07.10 (2013).
Not in our library10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.07.10
- 2.
Sacco AG, Cohen EE. Current Treatment Options for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3305-3313.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.2015.62.0963
- 3.
West AC, Johnstone RW. New and emerging HDAC inhibitors for cancer treatment. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2014;124:30-39.
Not in our library10.1172/jci69738
- 4.
Xu WS, Parmigiani RB, Marks PA. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: molecular mechanisms of action. Oncogene. 2007;26:5541-5552.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1210620
- 5.
F.D.A., U. S. F. a. D. A. FDA approves Farydak for treatment of multiple myeloma (2015).
Not in our library
- 6.
Haigentz M, et al. Phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:1281-8.
Not in our library10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.05.024
- 7.
Gray JE, et al. A phase I, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of panobinostat, an HDAC inhibitor, combined with erlotinib in patients with advanced aerodigestive tract tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1644-1655.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2235
- 8.
Takhar HS, et al. Phase I study evaluating the safety and efficacy of oral panobinostat in combination with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2015;26:1069-1077.
Not in our library10.1097/cad.0000000000000282
- 9.
Ramalingam SS, et al. Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in combination with either vorinostat or placebo for first-line therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:56-62.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.2009.24.9094
- 10.
Qiu T, et al. Effects of treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors in solid tumors: a review based on 30 clinical trials. Future Oncol. 2013;9:255-269.
Not in our library10.2217/fon.12.173
- 11.
Chou TC, Talalay P. Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1984;22:27-55.
Not in our library10.1016/0065-2571(84)90007-4
- 12.
Prystowsky M, et al. Inhibition of Plk1 and Cyclin B1 Expression Results in Panobinostat-Induced G(2) Delay and Mitotic Defects. Scientific Reports. 2013;3:2640.
Not in our library10.1038/srep02640
- 13.
Campisi J. Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: good citizens, bad neighbors. Cell. 2005;120:513-522.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.003
- 14.
Krishnamurthy J, et al. Ink4a/Arf expression is a biomarker of aging. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1299-1307.
Not in our library10.1172/jci22475
- 15.
Coppé J-P, Desprez P-Y, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype: The Dark Side of Tumor Suppression. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease. 2010;5:99-118.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144
- 16.
Baker DJ, et al. Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders. Nature. 2011;479:232-236.
Not in our library10.1038/nature10600
- 17.
Chang J, et al. Clearance of senescent cells by ABT263 rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Nat Med. 2016;22:78-83.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.4010
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
Li M, et al. Oncogene-induced cellular senescence elicits an anti-Warburg effect. Proteomics. 2013;13:2585-2596.
Not in our library10.1002/pmic.201200298
- 21.
Bauer S, et al. Phase I study of panobinostat and imatinib in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:1155-1162.
Not in our library10.1038/bjc.2013.826
- 22.
- 23.
Rada-Iglesias A, et al. Butyrate mediates decrease of histone acetylation centered on transcription start sites and down-regulation of associated genes. Genome Res. 2007;17:708-719.
Not in our library10.1101/gr.5540007
- 24.
Duan H, Heckman CA, Boxer LM. Histone deacetylase inhibitors down-regulate bcl-2 expression and induce apoptosis in t(14;18) lymphomas. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:1608-1619.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.25.5.1608-1619.2005
- 25.
Frys S, et al. Entinostat, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor is active in B-cell lymphoma and enhances the anti-tumour activity of rituximab and chemotherapy agents. Br J Haematol. 2015;169:506-519.
Not in our library10.1111/bjh.13318
- 26.
Chao H, et al. Low dose histone deacetylase inhibitor, LBH589, potentiates anticancer effect of docetaxel in epithelial ovarian cancer via PI3K/Akt pathway. Cancer Lett. 2012;329:17-26.
Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2012.08.035
- 27.
Modesitt SC, Parsons SJ. In vitro and in vivo histone deacetylase inhibitor therapy with vorinostat and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer models: does timing matter? Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:351-357.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.030
- 28.
Zuco V, et al. Synergistic antitumor effects of novel HDAC inhibitors and paclitaxel in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e29085.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0029085
- 29.
Dowdy SC, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and paclitaxel cause synergistic effects on apoptosis and microtubule stabilization in papillary serous endometrial cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:2767-2776.
Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-06-0209
- 30.
Chao SK, et al. Resistance to discodermolide, a microtubule-stabilizing agent and senescence inducer, is 4E-BP1-dependent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:391-396.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1016962108
- 31.
Gosselin K, et al. Senescence-Associated Oxidative DNA Damage Promotes the Generation of Neoplastic Cells. Cancer Research. 2009;69:7917-7925.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2510
- 32.
Laberge R-M, Awad P, Campisi J, Desprez P-Y. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by Senescent Fibroblasts. Cancer Microenvironment. 2012;5:39-44.
Not in our library10.1007/s12307-011-0069-4
- 33.
Kang T-W, et al. Senescence surveillance of pre-malignant hepatocytes limits liver cancer development. Nature. 2011;479:547-551.
Not in our library10.1038/nature10599
- 34.
Lujambio A. To clear, or not to clear (senescent cells)? That is the question. Inside the Cell. 2016;1:87-95.
Not in our library10.1002/bies.201670910
- 35.
Cao XX, Mohuiddin I, Ece F, McConkey DJ, Smythe WR. Histone deacetylase inhibitor downregulation of bcl-xl gene expression leads to apoptotic cell death in mesothelioma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001;25:562-568.
Not in our library10.1165/ajrcmb.25.5.4539
- 36.
Zhang W, et al. Histone modifications contribute to cellular replicative and hydrogen peroxide-induced premature senescence in human embryonic lung fibroblasts. Free Radic Res. 2014;48:550-559.
Not in our library10.3109/10715762.2014.893580
- 37.
Munster P, et al. Clinical and Biological Effects of Valproic Acid as a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor on Tumor and Surrogate Tissues: Phase I/II Trial of Valproic acid and Epirubicin/FEC. Clinical Cancer Research. 2009;15:2488-96.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-1930
- 38.
Arce C, et al. A proof-of-principle study of epigenetic therapy added to neoadjuvant doxorubicin cyclophosphamide for locally advanced breast cancer. PLoS One. 2006;1:e98.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0000098
- 39.
Komlodi-Pasztor E, Sackett D, Wilkerson J, Fojo T. Mitosis is not a key target of microtubule agents in patient tumors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:244-250.
Not in our library10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.228
- 40.
Mitchison TJ. The proliferation rate paradox in antimitotic chemotherapy. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23:1-6.
Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e10-04-0335
- 41.
Sun Y, et al. Treatment-induced damage to the tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B. Nat Med. 2012;18:1359-68.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.2890
- 42.
Sidi R, et al. Induction of senescence markers after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma and association with clinical outcome: an exploratory analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:326-332.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.044
- 43.
Vichai V, Kirtikara K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1112-1116.
Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2006.179
- 44.
Itahana K, Campisi J, Dimri GP. Methods to detect biomarkers of cellular senescence: the senescence-associated beta-galactosidase assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;371:21-31.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-59745-361-5_3
Cited by papers we hold 10
- Cellular Senescence: Molecular Targets, Biomarkers, and Senolytic Drugs · 2022No notice
- Why Senescent Cells Are Resistant to Apoptosis: An Insight for Senolytic Development · 2022No notice
- Anticancer Therapy with HDAC Inhibitors: Mechanism-Based Combination Strategies and Future Perspectives · 2021No notice
- Therapy-Induced Senescence: An “Old” Friend Becomes the Enemy · 2020No notice
- Clearance of therapy‐induced senescent tumor cells by the senolytic ABT‐263 via interference with BCL‐X L –BAX interaction · 2020No notice
- Senolytics decrease senescent cells in humans: Preliminary report from a clinical trial of Dasatinib plus Quercetin in individuals with diabetic kidney disease · 2019Corrected
- Targeting senescent cells in translational medicine · 2019No notice
- Comparison of the antifibrotic effects of the pan-histone deacetylase-inhibitor panobinostat versus the IPF-drug pirfenidone in fibroblasts from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. · 2018Not checked
- Vascular Senescence in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases · 2018No notice
- Ageing, Cellular Senescence and Neurodegenerative Disease · 2018No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.