Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.

Visualizing the native cellular organization by coupling cryofixation with expansion microscopy (Cryo-ExM)

Marine H. Laporte, Nikolai Klena, Virginie Hamel and 1 more

Nature Methods · 2022 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01356-4

Abstract

Cryofixation has proven to be the gold standard for efficient preservation of native cell ultrastructure compared to chemical fixation, but this approach is not widely used in fluorescence microscopy owing to implementation challenges. Here, we develop Cryo-ExM, a method that preserves native cellular organization by coupling cryofixation with expansion microscopy. This method bypasses artifacts associated with chemical fixation and its simplicity will contribute to its widespread use in super-resolution microscopy.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Main

In super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRM), which now encompasses expansion microscopy (ExM), it is possible to locate proteins with nanometer resolution in a cellular context. However, SRM often requires cell fixation with aldehyde-based chemical crosslinkers, such as paraformaldehyde or protein precipitation with cold methanol, both followed by cell permeabilization, all of which potentially alter the native cellular state and indirectly the interpretations that follow. This issue was raised decades ago in electron microscopy (EM) where years of development resulted in demonstrating that cryofixation (rapidly fixing the cell in a vitreous state), is the sole approach for preserving the native ultrastructure,.

To address this important issue, several groups developed SRM on cryofixed samples, such as cryo-SIM,, cryo-SMLM or cryo-SOFI, but these approaches often require sophisticated custom setups, highly stable cryostages, as well as specific high NA long-working-distance air objectives to avoid sample devitrification, limiting their use by most laboratories.

On the other hand, applying our optimized expansion microscopy protocol U-ExM on unfixed cells preserves the ultrastructure of the centriole, a stable microtubule-based organelle; however, we also observed that the complete lack of fixation in living cells leads to the loss of some cellular elements such as cytoplasmic microtubules. We therefore were motivated to develop Cryo-ExM, a method that combines the advantages of expansion microscopy for super-resolution imaging and cryopreservation.

Combining cryofixation with expansion microscopy

To develop Cryo-ExM, we capitalized on the well-known EM approach of cryofixation followed by freeze substitution, which consists of embedding a vitrified specimen in a resin before polymerization and subsequently processing for EM studies. This approach allows for high levels of cellular architecture preservation and far surpasses chemical fixation,. We reasoned that EM resin could be replaced by the expansion microscopy hydrogel (Fig. 1a). To do so, biological samples grown on glass coverslips are first cryofixed using conventional rapid plunging in liquid ethane–propane to form vitreous ice, as used in cryo-FIB-milling studies (Extended Data Fig. 1). Then, vitrified coverslips are incubated in acetone pre-cooled with liquid nitrogen (−180 °C) and placed on dry ice (−80 °C) overnight, allowing dry ice evaporation and a gradual rise in sample temperature from −180 °C to 0 °C. During this step, the water of the sample is slowly replaced by acetone, a crucial process ensuring proper cell architecture preservation. Samples are next rehydrated with sequential baths of ethanol mixed with an increasing amount of water and proceed for ExM hydrogel embedding using the U-ExM protocol (Methods).

Cryofixation surpasses chemical fixations when coupled to U-ExM

To validate Cryo-ExM, we first chose to simultaneously visualize a membrane-based organelle, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) using GFP-Sec61β as a proxy and the microtubule (MT) cytoskeleton using α/β-tubulin antibodies, two dynamic subcellular structures that are sensitive to chemical fixation, (Fig. 1). We compared expanded U2OS cells treated with aldehydes (paraformaldehyde (PFA) alone and a mix of PFA and glutaraldehyde (GA)), methanol or cryofixed (Fig. 1b–e). As previously observed, we found that PFA fixation disrupted both ER and microtubule integrity, as these structures seemed fragmented (Fig. 1b). Similarly, both methanol and PFA/GA fixations affected ER morphology, though to a lesser extent, giving rise to a less-fragmented ER, while preserving microtubules (Fig. 1c,d). In contrast, Cryo-ExM led to thin nonfragmented ER tubules, which is in agreement with live SRM data. Overall, Cryo-ExM provided good preservation of the cellular organization with microtubules that seemed fully intact (Fig. 1e), demonstrating that cryofixation, freeze substitution and expansion microscopy procedures are compatible with ER and microtubule ultrastructure organization. Moreover, we also noticed that this approach preserves the cellular organization deep inside the cell allowing visualization of the perinuclear reticulum as well as the so-called nucleoplasmic reticulum, which corresponds to dynamic convolutions of the nuclear envelope, including deep tubular invaginations of variable length, from ~200 nm diameter to start, narrowing toward the inside the nucleus (Extended Data Fig. 2).

From these results, we next investigated whether the ER–MT interactions, previously observed using live SRM imaging, could be captured using Cryo-ExM (Fig. 2a and Extended Data Fig. 3). Thus, we looked at cell edges and found individual ER tubules in contact with microtubules, resembling the described ER attachment to the tips of polymerizing MT (insets 1–3) and ER branching along the MT (inset 4) (Fig. 2a). Moreover, we found that cryo-ExM can retain and resolve the nanoscale-sized holes in ER sheets as observed previously in live-STED imaging (Fig. 2a,b and Extended Data Figs. 3 and 4a, inset). Besides microtubules, ER has been also involved in the regulation of mitochondrial function and ER-mitochondria contact sites have been extensively studied notably by live SRM. Hence, using NHS-ester staining, a compound that reacts with the primary amines of proteins, we performed a global proteome labeling, consistently revealing the position of mitochondria in the global cellular context,. Combining NHS-ester to ER labeling, we could also observe that cryo-ExM can capture ER wrapping as well as entanglement of the mitochondria (Fig. 2b,c and Extended Data Fig. 4). Finally, the use of MitoTracker allowed us to demonstrate that both cryo and PFA/GA fixations preserve better the ultrastructure of mitochondria compared to methanol or PFA (Fig. 2d–j).

Cryo-ExM highly preserves the cytoskeleton landscape

We further explored the preservation of the cytoskeletal landscape. First, we looked at the actin network of growth cones in cultured hippocampal neurons, known for their unique cytoskeleton organization. By simultaneously imaging the actin cytoskeleton using β-actin antibodies together with microtubules, we found that both cytoskeletons remain intact in cryo-ExM and their canonical organization is preserved, with internal microtubule bundles and actin structures such as filopodia and ruffles forming waves at the cell periphery (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 5). Second, we stained U2OS cells for actin and could unveil the different typical actin networks, the lamellipodia, filopodia and stress fibers (Fig. 3b). Finally, we turned to LifeAct to label filamentous actin and analyzed it under different fixation conditions (Supplementary Fig. 1). Notably, we found that cryo-ExM gave similar results as the gold standard PFA/GA for actin and did not affect expansion as we noticed minimal distortions of 1.6%, similar or smaller to the distortions observed using other expansion microscopy methods, (Supplementary Fig. 2).

We also analyzed the microtubule cytoskeleton organization. We first inspected the highly dynamic microtubule network found in mitotic RPE-1 cells and observed that cryo-ExM enabled high preservation of the mitotic spindle as well as astral microtubules, which are difficult to maintain owing to the chemical fixations artifacts (Fig. 3c and Extended Data Fig. 6a–e). We also found that the mitotic spindle displayed an isotropic ~fourfold expansion by measuring the spindle length before and after expansion as well as the centriole as an internal ruler (Extended Data Fig. 6a–c,g,h). Using NHS-ester staining, we observed that cryo-ExM protects the overall organization of the mitotic cells as chromosomes, intact mitochondria and the midbody could be observed (Extended Data Fig. 6e,f). Second, we looked at nondividing cells where cilia protrude from the cell surface and found that motile cilia from ependymal cells were fully preserved, displaying the canonical length of 7 μm (Fig. 3d and Extended Data Fig. 7a,b), as well as primary cilia where we detected that microtubule nucleation sites on the underlying mature basal body were overall better preserved than with regular methanol fixation (Extended Data Fig. 7c–f).

Cryo-ExM improves epitope accessibility

Next, as it is known that chemical fixations can affect epitopes accessibility in immunostainings,, we investigated whether Cryo-ExM could alleviate this issue. To do so, we first compared fixation effects on the staining intensity of the ER using GFP-Sec61β as a proxy. We found that PFA/GA fixation decreased overall fluorescence intensity by 40% compared to Cryo-ExM (Fig. 4a–c). Then, we analyzed the fixation effect on the outer mitochondrial membrane translocase TOMM20 density (Fig. 4d–g). Notably we observed a greater labeling density using cryofixation compared to PFA/GA, PFA alone or methanol (Fig. 4g). We also noticed that the use of MitoTracker allowed us to resolve the mitochondrial cristae, highlighting that the inner architecture of this organelle is intact (Fig. 4h–j and Extended Data Fig. 8). Also, we noticed that when staining microtubules and mitochondria together, the cytoplasmic signal for tubulin was absent in the space occupied by mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 3). We hypothesize that this could correspond to the cytoplasmic soluble pool of tubulin that is usually precipitated or lost owing to chemical fixation and permeabilization.

Versatility of the Cryo-ExM method

Finally, we investigated the generality of epitope preservation of Cryo-ExM by assessing other cellular structures such as lysosomes/autophagosomes (Lamp1 and LC3), Golgi apparatus (GM130) and nuclear pores (NUP205). We found that all structures could be visualized in Cryo-ExM, demonstrating the wide range of epitope preservation of this method (Fig. 5a–d and Extended Data Fig. 9). In addition, we assessed whether cryofixation can solve two well-known artifacts of aldehydes fixations: the exclusion of the transcription factor SOX2 from the DNA in mitosis and the cellular distribution of the cell surface glycoprotein CD44. Probably owing to the instantaneous fixation that prevents protein diffusion, we found that cryofixation preserves the correct localization of SOX2 on chromatin of nonexpanded human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b) and that CD44 labeling is highly preserved with a pattern colocalizing with actin fibers as previously observed in two-color SRM as well as in consistency with the known colocalization of CD44 with the Golgi apparatus (Supplementary Fig. 4c–f).

Last, we further investigated the ability of Cryo-ExM to safeguard the native cellular organization by imaging a soft organelle that is affected by chemical fixation, namely phase-separated organelles. Therefore, we turned to analyze the pyrenoid, a liquid-like droplet organelle from the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, made of the densely packed CO2-fixing enzyme Rubisco, crucial for the photosynthesis process. Using NHS-ester staining,, we observed that both methanol and cryofixation could preserve structures inside the pyrenoid that most likely correspond to the pyrenoid tubules, previously observed by cryo-electron tomography after cryo-FIB-milling (Fig. 5e–h). However, we noticed that upon methanol fixation, the expanded Chlamydomonas cells were slightly collapsed and their pyrenoid shape was variable, as indicated by the roundness index and the area (Fig. 5e,eʹ,i and Extended Data Fig. 10). As phase-separated organelles are often perfect spherical droplet, this result might indicate that methanol fixation induces a protein precipitation deforming the pyrenoid. In contrast, we found that applying Cryo-ExM directly on Chlamydomonas cells seems to better preserve the liquid-droplet shape of the pyrenoid as these showed more homogeneous circularity (Fig. 5f,fʹ,i and Extended Data Fig. 10), suggesting that these cellular structures formed by phase separation remain intact under these conditions.

Discussion

In this work, we introduce a new method to perform SRM by coupling cryofixation of a biological specimen with ExM. With this, we provide a universal framework to visualize subcellular compartments without chemical fixation artifacts such as structural alteration and loss of antigenicity. Moreover, Cryo-ExM alleviates the issues of optimizing fixation conditions required to visualize specific structures and is therefore expected to enable more accurate protein localization. Notably, this method also demonstrates that the classical cryo-substitution protocols developed for EM are compatible with expansion microscopy by replacing the EM resin with hydrogel monomer solutions. Therefore, this approach may also be applicable on tissues cryofixed by high-pressure freezing as well as in hydrogel-based tissue clearing. Finally, as expansion microscopy is also compatible with SIM, STED or dSTORM–, our method now allows all these microscopy modalities to image easily cells in their native state, paving the way for further studies of complex cellular processes.

Reagents and reagent preparation

The following reagents were used in this study: Glutaraldehyde (GA, 25%, G5882, Sigma), Paraformaldehyde (PFA, 16%, cat. no. 15710, EMS), methanol (99.9%, M/4058/17, Thermo Fisher Scientific), ethane:propane 37%:63% (PanGas), acetone (99.8% AcroSeal, cat. no. 67-64-1, Acros Organics), Formaldehyde (FA, 36.5–38%, F8775, SIGMA), Acrylamide (AA, 40%, A4058, SIGMA), N,Nʹ-methylenbisacrylamide (2%, M1533, SIGMA), Sodium acrylate (SA, 97–99%, 408220, SIGMA), ammonium persulfate (APS, 17874, Thermo Fisher Scientific), tetramethylethylendiamine (TEMED, 17919, Thermo Fisher Scientific), nuclease-free water (AM9937, Ambion-Thermo Fisher Scientific), and poly-d-lysine (A3890401, Gibco).

SA stock solution was prepared by resuspending 25 g of SA powder in 40.8 g of nuclease-free water (final concentration 38% w/w). SA was added in three times under agitation and left steering at 4 °C overnight until complete dissolution. Monomer solution is composed of 19% SA, 10% AA and 0.1% N,Nʹ-methylenbisacrylamide completed with 10× PBS and stored at −20 °C at least 24 h before gelation. Denaturation buffer is composed of 200 mM SDS, 200 mM NaCl and 50 mM Tris-BASE, pH 9.

Chlamydomonasreinhardtii

The cell-wall-less Chlamydomonas strain CW15 was grown in liquid Tris acetate phosphate medium (containing Trace) at 22 °C or on Tris acetate phosphate plates with 1.5% agar, as previously described. Cells were either fixed by immersion in −20 °C chilled methanol for 5 min or cryofixed with plunging in liquid ethane/propane mix (see below).

Cell lines

Mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF), retinal pigment epithelium (RPE-1), Homo sapiens bone osteosarcoma (U2OS) and human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and GlutaMAX (Life Technologies), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies) and penicillin and streptomycin (100 μg ml−1) at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were plated at 35,000 cells cm−2 for U2OS and RPE-1 and at 10,000 cells cm−2 for MEF cells. For analysis of cilia morphology (Extended Data Fig. 7) and lysosomes/autophagosomes (Fig. 5), RPE-1 cells were incubated for 48 h in starvation medium (DMEM GlutaMAX supplemented with 0.5% fetal calf serum). For analysis of mitochondrial morphology (Figs. 2d–j and 4d–j, Extended Data Fig. 8 and Supplementary Fig. 3), cells were incubated with 100 nM MitoTracker deep red (M22426, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 40 min before fixation.

Mouse neuronal cell culture

Primary cultures of hippocampal neurons were obtained according to the procedure described previously. Hippocampi were dissected from E18.5 mouse embryos in HBSS (Invitrogen) containing HEPES 10 mM, streptomycin 10 µg ml−1, penicillin 10 U ml−1, treated with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA for 10 min at 37 °C and disrupted by 10–15 aspirations/ejections through a 5-ml pipette, followed by ten cycles through a micropipette tip. Dissociated hippocampal neurons were seeded in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated horse serum at 50,000 cells cm−2 in six-well plates on 12-mm glass coverslips precoated overnight with 50 μg ml−1 poly-d-lysine (Sigma) at 37 °C. At 20 h after seeding, the medium was changed to the culture medium (Neurobasal (Invitrogen), B27 supplement 2%, sodium pyruvate 1 mM, l-glutamine 2 mM, streptomycin 10 µg ml−1, penicillin 10 U ml−1) and neurons were imaged between 2–4 d in vitro. These experiments were carried out in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Geneva and with permission of the Geneva cantonal authorities.

Mouse ependymal cell culture

Ependymal cell culture was prepared as previously described. Newborn mice (P0–P3) were killed by decapitation, and brains dissected in Hank’s solution (10% HBSS, 5% HEPES, 5% sodium bicarbonate and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S)). The extracted ventricular walls were cut manually into pieces, followed by enzymatic digestion (DMEM GlutaMAX, 33% papain (Worthington 3126), 17% DNase at 10 mg ml−1 and 42% cysteine at 12 mg ml−1) for 45 min at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Digestion was stopped by the addition of a solution of trypsin inhibitors (Leibovitz Medium L15, 10% ovomucoid at 1 mg ml−1 and 2% DNase at 10 mg ml−1). Cells were washed and resuspended in DMEM GlutaMAX supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% P/S in a poly-d-lysine-coated flask. Ependymal progenitors proliferated for 5 d until confluence followed by shaking (250 r.p.m.) overnight. Pure confluent astroglial monolayers were replated at a density of 7 × 104 cells per cm2 in DMEM GlutaMAX, 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% P/S on poly-d-lysine-coated coverslips. After 24 h, the medium was replaced by serum-free DMEM GlutaMAX 1% P/S, to trigger gradual ependymal differentiation (2–3 d in vitro).

GFP-Sec61β

The truncated form of Sec61β(45-97) was generated according to previous work, as the authors found that this Sec61β fragment decorated the ER without affecting microtubule bundling. GFP-Sec61β (133–291) was obtained by subcloning the C-terminal DNA fragment (133–291) (corresponding to aa 45 to 97) from the pAc-GFPC1-Sec61β (plasmid 15108 Addgene) into the peGFP-C1 vector, using the following primers: Fwd (EcoRI) 5ʹ- ATgaattctGGCCGCACAACCTCG-3ʹ and Rev (ApaI) 5ʹ- ATTTgggcccCTACGAACGAGTGTACTTGCC-3ʹ. This cloning was performed by the Aumeier Laboratory (University of Geneva).

LifeAct-GFP

LifeAct-eGFP plasmid (Addgene no. 58470) was a kind gift from R. Sadoul.

U2OS expressing GFP-sec61β (133–291) or LifeAct-GFP were transiently transfected with JetPRIME following the manufacturer’s instructions. After 24 h of expression, cells were fixed as described below.

Cell fixation

Cells grown at desired confluence were washed in PBS and either cryofixed (see below) or with the following protocols when specified: (1) by immersion in −20 °C chilled methanol for 5 min, (2) in 4% PFA for 15 min at room temperature, (3) in 3% PFA + 0.1% GA for 20 min at room temperature or (4) in 1% PFA + 0.2% GA (Supplementary Fig. 4c–f) for 20 min at room temperature.

Plunge-freezing and freeze substitution

The 12-mm coverslips containing the sample were held halfway with a thin tweezer (Dumont 5, Sigma F6521-1EA), the excess of remaining medium was strongly blotted with a filter paper and coverslips were rapidly plunged with a homemade plunge freezer into liquid ethane or an ethane/propane mix cooled with liquid nitrogen (Extended Data Fig. 1a–c). Note that the homemade plunger is a classical system used by most of the cryomicroscopy laboratories but an automatic system might work similarly. No difference could be observed between pure ethane and an ethane/propane mix, the latter mix being more convenient because it does not solidify at the temperature of liquid nitrogen. Coverslips were then rapidly transferred into a 5-ml Eppendorf tube containing 2.5 ml of liquid nitrogen-chilled acetone (Extended Data Fig. 1d). Tubes were placed on dry ice with a 45° angle and agitated overnight to allow the temperature to rise to −80 °C (Extended Data Fig. 1d). Samples were further incubated without dry ice for 1.5 h until the temperature reached ~0 °C. Samples were then rehydrated in successive ethanol:water baths, 5 min each, as follows: ethanol 100%, ethanol 100%, ethanol 95%, ethanol 95%, ethanol 70%, ethanol 50% and PBS. Cells were stored in PBS until expansion or directly processed for immunostaining (Extended Data Fig. 6c and Supplementary Figs. 2 and 4a,b).

Ultrastructure expansion microscopy

Expansion of the cells was performed as previously described. Briefly, fixed cells (cryo, PFA, PFA/GA or methanol) were incubated for 3 to 5 h in 2% AA and 1.4% FA diluted in PBS at 37 °C before gelation in monomer solution containing 0.5% tetramethylethylendiamine and ammonium persulfate. Next, cells were incubated for 5 min on ice followed by 1 h at 37 °C and incubated for 1.5 h at 95 °C in denaturation buffer. Gels were washed twice in ddH2O. Note that the original U-ExM protocol without previous fixation depolymerizes cytoplasmic microtubules. In contrast, cryofixation before U-ExM protocol preserves cytoplasmic microtubules.

Note that the quality of sample preservation using the plunger was also compared to manual immersion. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 5a–d, manual immersion leads to wavy and broken microtubules, whereas the plunger fully preserves their native structures. Note also that sample fractures could be sometimes observed, as classically observed in cryomicroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 5e–h).

Immunostaining

Gels were incubated in PBS for 30 min and stained for 3 h at 37 °C under constant agitation with the following antibodies diluted in 2% PBS–BSA: tubulin monobodies AA344 (1:250 dilution, scFv-S11B, β-tubulin) and AA345 (1:250 dilution, scFv-F2C, α-tubulin), mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (1:250 dilution, 60008-1-1, Proteintech), rabbit polyclonal anti-α-tubulin (1:250 dilution, ab18251, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-PolyE (1:500 dilution, AG-25B-0030, AdipoGen), rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP (1:250 dilution, TP401, Torrey Pines), rabbit polyclonal anti-TOMM20 (1:250 dilution, ab186734, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-GM130 (1:250 dilution, 11308-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit polyclonal anti-actin (1:250 dilution, ab1801, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-NUP205 (1:250 dilution, 24439-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit polyclonal anti-LC3 (1:250 dilution, 14600-1-AP, Proteintech), rabbit polyclonal anti-Lamp1 (1:250 dilution, D2D11, Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-Sox2 (1:250 dilution, 20118-1-AP,Proteintech), mouse monoclonal anti-CD44 (1:250 dilution, 60224-1-Ig, Proteintech). The following secondary antibodies were used: goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 IgG H+L (1:400 dilution, A11008) and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568 IgG H+L (1:250 dilution, A11004) (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gels were washed three times in PBS–Tween 0.1% and expanded by successive baths of ddH2O. When indicated, the gel was further incubated in NHS-ester Alexa594 (20 mg ml−1 in PBS, AD594-31, ATTO-TEC) or NHS-ester AlexaA488 (20 mg ml−1 in PBS, 46402, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1.5 h at room temperature under constant agitation, washed three times in PBS and expanded by successive baths of ddH2O.

For direct immunostaining on coverslips (Extended Data Fig. 6c and Supplementary Figs. 2 and 4a,b), coverslips were incubated for 15 min in 2% PBS–BSA–Tween 0.1% and incubated with the primary antibodies diluted in 2% PBS–BSA–Tween 0.1% for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes in PBS–Tween 0.1%, secondary antibodies diluted in 2% PBS–BSA–Tween 0.1% were incubated for 1 h at temperature. Coverslips were then mounted in presence of 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and imaged as described below. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted twice compared to post-expansion staining.

To visualize the actin network, we either used β-actin antibodies or LifeAct-GFP. Comparison of LifeAct-GFP to β-actin staining patterns confirmed that both could be used to faithfully visualize actin in human cells using Cryo-ExM (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Image acquisition

Pieces of gels were mounted on 24-mm round precision coverslips (1.5H, 0117640, Marienfeld) coated with poly-d-lysine for imaging. Image acquisition was performed on an inverted Leica TCS SP8 microscope or a Leica Thunder DMi8 microscope using a ×631.4 NA oil objective with Lightening or Thunder LVCC (large volume computational clearing) mode at max resolution, adaptive as ‘Strategy’ and water as ‘Mounting medium’ to generate deconvolved images. Three-dimensional stacks were acquired with 0.12 μm z-intervals and an x, y pixel size of 35 nm (Leica TCS SP8) or 0.21 μm z-intervals and an x, y pixel size of 100 nm (Thunder DMi8).

Quantifications

For each gel, a caliper was used to accurately measure its expanded size. The gel expansion factor was obtained by dividing the expanded size by the original size of the coverslip (12 mm in this work). Each measurement was divided by the calculated expansion factor and reported as such in the graphs or figure scale bars, except in Extended Data Fig. 6g,h where lengths and diameters are indicated as expanded and after rescaling.

Length of the motile cilia

Cilia were manually traced using the segmented line tool of ImageJ. The total measured length was divided by the expansion factor of the gel and reported as a dot plot using GraphPad (https://www.graphpad.com/).

Area and roundness of the pyrenoids

Methanol-fixed and cryofixed pyrenoids were manually delineated using the polygon selection tool of ImageJ. Roundness and area were calculated and reported as dot plot using GraphPad.

GFP-Sec61β intensity signal measurement

For the comparison of GFP-Sec61β signal intensity obtained after cryofixation versus PFA/GA fixation, we measured the mean intensity of identical regions of interest (200 × 200 pixels) from nondeconvolved images of each condition. Five regions of interest per cell were quantified and averaged. Dot-plots were generated using GraphPad.

Mitochondrial area and TOMM20 density measurement

For comparison of mitochondrial morphology under different fixative conditions (cryofixation, methanol, PFA and PFA/GA), we binarized deconvolved images on the MitoTracker channel and applied a mask to draw the outlines of the mitochondrial network. We then quantified the surface area of the mitochondrial network and expressed it as a percentage of the whole cell surface area. For the quantification of the TOMM20 density under different fixative conditions (cryofixation, methanol, PFA and PFA/GA), we manually counted the number of TOMM20 dots in 3–5 mitochondria per cell and expressed it as dots μm−2. The surface of mitochondria was calculated on the MitoTracker channel as above. Dot-plots were generated using GraphPad.

Mitotic spindle measurements

RPE-1 cells were cryofixed and either directly stained with α/β-tubulin antibodies and DAPI or processed for U-ExM and post-stained with α/β-tubulin antibodies and DAPI. Quantification of the mitotic spindle length at different mitotic stages (prophase, metaphase and anaphase) was performed with the straight-line tool of image and plotted with GraphPad.

Plot profiles

Plot profiles from Fig. 4j, Extended Data Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 3f were obtained using the straight-line tool of ImageJ and plotted using GraphPad. The distance between either half of the maximal (Extended Data Figs. 4f and 6g) or peak-to-peak (Extended Data Fig. 6h) distance was calculated.

RMS calculation on U2OS cells expressing LifeAct-GFP

U2OS were cultured, transfected with LifeAct-GFP plasmid and cryofixed as described above. GFP-positive cells in a restricted area at the center of the coverslips were rapidly acquired and the coverslips were directly processed for U-ExM as described above. The center of the gel was stained with anti-GFP (see immunostaining section) and acquired with the same microscope as previous expansion. To estimate the sample deformation after expansion, we calculated the r.m.s. error between two images of the same structure before and after expansion, following the protocol described by Chozinski et al. This protocol also provides the scale factor between the images, thus giving the expansion factor of the experiment.

Statistical analysis

The comparison of two groups was performed using a two-sided Student’s t-test or its nonparametric correspondent, the Mann–Whitney U-test, if normality was not granted either because of not being checked (n < 10) or because it was rejected (D’Agostino and Pearson test). The comparisons of more than two groups were made using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc tests (Kruskal–Wallis test) to identify all the significant group differences. n indicates independent biological replicates from distinct samples. Data are represented as scatter-plots with center line as mean. The graphs with error bars indicate 1 s.d. (±) and the significance level is denoted as usual (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). All statistical analyses were performed using Prism7 (GraphPad v.7.0a).

Reproducibility

All experiments were performed at least three times, except for the ependymal cells and neurons, which were performed only once. Representative images are shown for each experiment.

Reporting Summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41592-021-01356-4.

References 43

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1260088

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm.2017.71

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1855

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03569.x

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1006/jsbi.1998.3971

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1364/optica.393203

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.051

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaz5357

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1810690116

  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-018-0238-1

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.mcb.2020.05.006

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03083.x

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aad8857

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0968-4328(00)00026-3

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.057

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.008

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaf3928

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aba4542

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2872-20.2020

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00018.2013

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1220

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.mcb.2020.04.014

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201305041

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.015

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1242/bio.019943

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aat5304

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.008

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1504822112

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.7b07200

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.8b00776

  33. 33.
  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.011

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0586-14.2015

  36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-49416-2

  37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13238-017-0492-5

  38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1017/s1431927608080781

  39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aaz4137

  40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2005.01.003

  41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00132.x

  42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2089

  43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3833

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.