Precision and accuracy of single-molecule FRET measurements—a multi-laboratory benchmark study

Abstract

Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) is increasingly being used to determine distances, structures, and dynamics of biomolecules in vitro and in vivo. However, generalized protocols and FRET standards to ensure the reproducibility and accuracy of measurements of FRET efficiencies are currently lacking. Here we report the results of a comparative blind study in which 20 labs determined the FRET efficiencies (E) of several dye-labeled DNA duplexes. Using a unified, straightforward method, we obtained FRET efficiencies with s.d. between ±0.02 and ±0.05. We suggest experimental and computational procedures for converting FRET efficiencies into accurate distances, and discuss potential uncertainties in the experiment and the modeling. Our quantitative assessment of the reproducibility of intensity-based smFRET measurements and a unified correction procedure represents an important step toward the validation of distance networks, with the ultimate aim of achieving reliable structural models of biomolecular systems by smFRET-based hybrid methods.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 51

1. 1.

   Förster T. Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz. Ann. Phys. 1948;437:55-75.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Stryer L, Haugland RP. Energy transfer: a spectroscopic ruler. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1967;58:719-726.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.58.2.719

3. 3.

   Murchie AI, et al. Fluorescence energy transfer shows that the four-way DNA junction is a right-handed cross of antiparallel molecules. Nature. 1989;341:763-766.

   Not in our library10.1038/341763a0

4. 4.

   Mekler V, et al. Structural organization of bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme and the RNA polymerase-promoter open complex. Cell. 2002;108:599-614.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00667-0

5. 5.

   Ha T, et al. Probing the interaction between two single molecules: fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a single donor and a single acceptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:6264-6268.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.93.13.6264

6. 6.

   Schuler B, Lipman EA, Steinbach PJ, Kumke M, Eaton WA. Polyproline and the “spectroscopic ruler” revisited with single-molecule fluorescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:2754-2759.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0408164102

7. 7.

   Choi UB, et al. Single-molecule FRET-derived model of the synaptotagmin 1-SNARE fusion complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17:318-384.

   Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.1763

8. 8.

   Kalinin S, et al. A toolkit and benchmark study for FRET-restrained high-precision structural modeling. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:1218-1227.

   Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2222

9. 9.

   Hellenkamp B, Wortmann P, Kandzia F, Zacharias M, Hugel T. Multidomain structure and correlated dynamics determined by self-consistent FRET Networks. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:174-180.

   Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.4081

10. 10.

    Eilert T, Beckers M, Drechsler F, Michaelis J. Fast-NPS—a Markov chain Monte Carlo-based analysis tool to obtain structural information from single-molecule FRET measurements. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2017;219:377-389.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Hofmann D, Korzdorfer T, Kummel S. Energy transfer and Forster’s dipole coupling approximation investigated in a real-time Kohn-Sham scheme. Phys. Rev. A. 2010;82:012509.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Spiegel JD, Fulle S, Kleinschmidt M, Gohlke H. & Marian, C. M. Failure of the IDA in FRET systems at close inter-dye distances is moderated by frequent low k2 values. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2016;120:8845-8862.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b05754

13. 13.

    Sakon JJ, Weninger KR. Detecting the conformation of individual proteins in live cells. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:203-205.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1421

14. 14.

    Sabanayagam CR, Eid JS, Meller A. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer to measure distances along individual DNA molecules: corrections due to nonideal transfer. J. Chem. Phys. 2005;122:61103-61107.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.1854120

15. 15.

    McCann JJ, Choi UB, Zheng L, Weninger K, Bowen ME. Optimizing methods to recover absolute FRET efficiency from immobilized single molecules. Biophys. J. 2010;99:961-970.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.063

16. 16.

    Sisamakis E, Valeri A, Kalinin S, Rothwell PJ, Seidel CAM. Accurate single-molecule FRET studies using multiparameter fluorescence detection. Methods Enzymol. 2010;475:455-514.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0076-6879(10)75018-7

17. 17.

    Lee NK, et al. Accurate FRET measurements within single diffusing biomolecules using alternating-laser excitation. Biophys. J. 2005;88:2939-2953.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.104.054114

18. 18.

    Kudryavtsev V, et al. Combining MFD and PIE for accurate single-pair Förster resonance energy transfer measurements. ChemPhysChem. 2012;13:1060-1078.

    Not in our library10.1002/cphc.201100822

19. 19.

    Hohlbein J, Craggs TD, Cordes T. Alternating-laser excitation: single-molecule FRET and beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:1156-1171.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3cs60233h

20. 20.

    Margeat E, et al. Direct observation of abortive initiation and promoter escape within single immobilized transcription complexes. Biophys. J. 2006;90:1419-1431.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.105.069252

21. 21.

    Muschielok A, et al. A nano-positioning system for macromolecular structural analysis. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:965-971.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1259

22. 22.

    Beckers M, Drechsler F, Eilert T, Nagy J, Michaelis J. Quantitative structural information from single-molecule FRET. Faraday Discuss. 2015;184:117-129.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5fd00110b

23. 23.

    Dimura M, et al. Quantitative FRET studies and integrative modeling unravel the structure and dynamics of biomolecular systems. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016;40:163-185.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2016.11.012

24. 24.

    Brunger AT, Strop P, Vrljic M, Chu S, Weninger KR. Three-dimensional molecular modeling with single molecule FRET. J. Struct. Biol. 2011;173:497-505.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2010.09.004

25. 25.

    Craggs, T. D. et al. Substrate conformational dynamics drive structure-specific recognition of gapped DNA by DNA polymerase. bioRxiv Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/02/10/263038 (2018).

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkz797

26. 26.

    Nagy J, Eilert T, Michaelis J. Precision and accuracy in smFRET based structural studies—a benchmark study of the FAST-Nano-Positioning System. J. Chem. Phys. 2018;148:123308.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.5006477

27. 27.

    Ivani I, et al. Parmbsc1: a refined force field for DNA simulations. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:55-58.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3658

28. 28.

    Neubauer H, et al. Orientational and dynamical heterogeneity of rhodamine 6G terminally attached to a DNA helix revealed by NMR and single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:12746-12755.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja0722574

29. 29.

    Iqbal A, et al. Orientation dependence in fluorescent energy transfer between Cy3 and Cy5 terminally attached to double-stranded nuclelic acids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:11176-11181.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0801707105

30. 30.

    Peulen TO, Opanasyuk O, Seidel CAM. Combining graphical and analytical methods with molecular simulations to analyze time-resolved FRET-measurements of labeled macromolecules accurately. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2017;121:8211-8241.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b03441

31. 31.

    Digman MA, Caiolfa VR, Zamai M, Gratton E. The Phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging analysis. Biophys. J. 2008;84:L14-L16.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.107.120154

32. 32.

    Kapanidis AN, et al. Fluorescence-aided molecule sorting: analysis of structure and interactions by alternating-laser excitation of single molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:8936-8941.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0401690101

33. 33.

    Müller BK, Zaychikov E, Bräuchle C, Lamb DC. Pulsed interleaved excitation. Biophys. J. 2005;89:3508-3522.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.105.064766

34. 34.

    Wozniak AK, Schröder GF, Grubmüller H, Seidel CAM, Oesterhelt F. Single-molecule FRET measures bends and kinks in DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:18337-18342.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0800977105

35. 35.

    Stelzl LS, Erlenbach N, Heinz M, Prisner TF, Hummer G. Resolving the conformational dynamics of DNA with ångström resolution by pulsed electron-electron double resonance and molecular dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:11674-11677.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.7b05363

36. 36.

    Levitus M, Ranjit S. Cyanine dyes in biophysical research: the photophysics of polymethine fluorescent dyes in biomolecular environments. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2011;44:123-151.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0033583510000247

37. 37.

    Sindbert S, et al. Accurate distance determination of nucleic acids via Förster resonance energy transfer: implications of dye linker length and rigidity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:2463-2480.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja105725e

38. 38.

    Nir E, et al. Shot-noise limited single-molecule FRET histograms: comparison between theory and experiments. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:22103-22124.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp063483n

39. 39.

    Barth, A., Voith von Voithenberg, L. & Lamb, D. C. MFD-PIE and PIE-FI: ways to extract more information with TCSPC. in Advanced Photon Counting Vol. 15 (eds Kapusta, P., Wahl, M. & Erdmann, R.) 129–157 (Springer, Cham, 2015).

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Schmid S, Hugel T. Efficient use of single molecule time traces to resolve kinetic rates, models and uncertainties. J. Chem. Phys. 2018;148:123312.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.5006604

41. 41.

    Preus S, Hildebrandt LL, Birkedal V. Optimal background estimators in single-molecule FRET microscopy. Biophys. J. 2016;111:1278-1286.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2016.07.047

42. 42.

    Neher R, Neher E. Optimizing imaging parameters for the separation of multiple labels in a fluorescence image. J. Microsc. 2004;213:46-62.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2818.2004.01262.x

43. 43.

    Hildebrandt LL, Preus S, Birkedal V. Quantitative single molecule FRET efficiencies using TIRF microscopy. Faraday Discuss. 2015;184:131-142.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5fd00100e

44. 44.

    Deniz AA, et al. Single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer on freely diffusing molecules: observation of Forster distance dependence and subpopulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:3670-3675.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.96.7.3670

45. 45.

    Antonik M, Felekyan S, Gaiduk A, Seidel CAM. Separating structural heterogeneities from stochastic variations in fluorescence resonance energy transfer distributions via photon distribution analysis. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:6970-6978.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp057257+

46. 46.

    Kalinin S, Valeri A, Antonik M, Felekyan S, Seidel CAM. Detection of structural dynamics by FRET: a photon distribution and fluorescence lifetime analysis of systems with multiple states. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010;114:7983-7995.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp102156t

47. 47.

    Clegg, R. M. Förster resonance energy transfer—FRET what is it, why do it, and how it’s done. in Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Vol. 33 (ed Gadella, T. W. J.) 1–57 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2009).

    Not in our library

48. 48.

    Braslavsky SE, et al. Pitfalls and limitations in the practical use of Förster’s theory of resonance energy transfer. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2008;7:1444-1448.

    Not in our library10.1039/b810620g

49. 49.

    Knox RS, van Amerongen H. Refractive index dependence of the Forster resonance excitation transfer rate. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:5289-5293.

    Not in our library

50. 50.

    Voros J. The density and refractive index of adsorbing protein layers. Biophys. J. 2004;87:553-561.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.103.030072

51. 51.

    Clegg RM. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer and nucleic acids. Methods Enzymol. 1992;211:353-388.

    Not in our library10.1016/0076-6879(92)11020-j

Cited by papers we hold 5

• Reliability and accuracy of single-molecule FRET studies for characterization of structural dynamics and distances in proteins · 2023
  No notice
• Visualizing the disordered nuclear transport machinery in situ · 2023
  No notice
• The NEOtrap – en route with a new single-molecule technique · 2021
  Not checked
• FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices · 2021
  No notice
• Identifying weak interdomain interactions that stabilize the supertertiary structure of the N-terminal tandem PDZ domains of PSD-95 · 2018
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.