No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants after heterologous and homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination
Joana Barros-Martins, Swantje I. Hammerschmidt, Anne Cossmann and 22 more
Nature Medicine · 2021 · CC BY
doi:10.1101/2021.06.01.21258172
Abstract
Currently approved viral vector-based and mRNA-based vaccine approaches against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) consider only homologous prime-boost vaccination. After reports of thromboembolic events, several European governments recommended using AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1-nCov-19 (ChAd) only in individuals older than 60 years, leaving millions of already ChAd-primed individuals with the decision to receive either a second shot of ChAd or a heterologous boost with mRNA-based vaccines. However, such combinations have not been tested so far. We used Hannover Medical School’s COVID-19 Contact Study cohort of healthcare professionals to monitor ChAd-primed immune responses before and 3 weeks after booster with ChAd ( n = 32) or BioNTech/Pfizer’s BNT162b2 ( n = 55). Although both vaccines boosted prime-induced immunity, BNT162b2 induced significantly higher frequencies of spike-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and, in particular, high titers of neutralizing antibodies against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and P.1 variants of concern of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
References 22
- 1.
Polack FP, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:2603-2615.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2034577
- 2.
- 3.
Baden LR, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:403-416.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2035389
- 4.
Sadoff, J. et al. Safety and efficacy of single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2187–2201 (2021).
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2101544
- 5.
Wise J. Covid-19: European countries suspend use of Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine after reports of blood clots. BMJ. 2021;372:n699.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.n699
- 6.
Greinacher, A. et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2092–2101 (2021).
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2104840
- 7.
Pottegård A, et al. Arterial events, venous thromboembolism, thrombocytopenia, and bleeding after vaccination with Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S in Denmark and Norway: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2021;373:n1114.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.n1114
- 8.
Schultz, N. H. et al. Thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2124–2130 (2021).
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2104882
- 9.
Shaw, R. H. et al. Heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination: initial reactogenicity data. Lancet397, 2043–2046 (2021).
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01115-6
- 10.
Abdool Karim SS, de Oliveira T. New SARS-CoV-2 variants—clinical, public health, and vaccine implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:1866-1868.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmc2100362
- 11.
- 12.
Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and P.1 escape from neutralizing antibodies. Cell184, 2384–2393 (2021).
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.036
- 13.
Planas D, et al. Sensitivity of infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants to neutralizing antibodies. Nat. Med. 2021;27:917-924.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-021-01318-5
- 14.
Abu-Raddad, L. J., Chemaitelly, H. & Butt, A. A. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. N. Engl. J. Med. 10.1056/NEJMc2104974 (2021).
Not in our library10.1056/nejmc2104974
- 15.
- 16.
Madhi, S. A. et al. Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1885–1898 (2021).
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2102214
- 17.
- 18.
Behrens GMN, et al. Perceived versus proven SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in health-care professionals. Infection. 2020;48:631-634.
Not in our library10.1007/s15010-020-01461-0
- 19.
Bošnjak, B. et al. Low serum neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody levels in mildly affected COVID-19 convalescent patients revealed by two different detection methods. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 936-944 (2021).
Not in our library10.1038/s41423-020-00573-9
- 20.
Liu Y, et al. Neutralizing activity of BNT162b2-elicited serum. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:1466-1468.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmc2102017
- 21.
- 22.
Jablonka, A. et al. Protocol for longitudinal assessment of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in healthcare professionals in Hannover, Germany: the prospective, longitudinal, observational COVID-19 Contact (CoCo) study. Preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.02.20242479v1.full (2020).
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 4
- COVID-19 vaccine update: vaccine effectiveness, SARS-CoV-2 variants, boosters, adverse effects, and immune correlates of protection · 2022No notice
- Heterologous immunization with inactivated vaccine followed by mRNA-booster elicits strong immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant · 2022No notice
- The use of viral vectors in vaccine development · 2022No notice
- Protective mucosal immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after heterologous systemic prime-mucosal boost immunization · 2021No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.