Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants after heterologous and homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination

Joana Barros-Martins, Swantje I. Hammerschmidt, Anne Cossmann and 22 more

Nature Medicine · 2021 · CC BY

doi:10.1101/2021.06.01.21258172

Abstract

Currently approved viral vector-based and mRNA-based vaccine approaches against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) consider only homologous prime-boost vaccination. After reports of thromboembolic events, several European governments recommended using AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1-nCov-19 (ChAd) only in individuals older than 60 years, leaving millions of already ChAd-primed individuals with the decision to receive either a second shot of ChAd or a heterologous boost with mRNA-based vaccines. However, such combinations have not been tested so far. We used Hannover Medical School’s COVID-19 Contact Study cohort of healthcare professionals to monitor ChAd-primed immune responses before and 3 weeks after booster with ChAd ( n = 32) or BioNTech/Pfizer’s BNT162b2 ( n = 55). Although both vaccines boosted prime-induced immunity, BNT162b2 induced significantly higher frequencies of spike-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and, in particular, high titers of neutralizing antibodies against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and P.1 variants of concern of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

References 22

  1. 1.

    Polack FP, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:2603-2615.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2034577

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Baden LR, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:403-416.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2035389

  4. 4.

    Sadoff, J. et al. Safety and efficacy of single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2187–2201 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2101544

  5. 5.

    Wise J. Covid-19: European countries suspend use of Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine after reports of blood clots. BMJ. 2021;372:n699.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.n699

  6. 6.

    Greinacher, A. et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2092–2101 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2104840

  7. 7.

    Pottegård A, et al. Arterial events, venous thromboembolism, thrombocytopenia, and bleeding after vaccination with Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S in Denmark and Norway: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2021;373:n1114.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.n1114

  8. 8.

    Schultz, N. H. et al. Thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2124–2130 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2104882

  9. 9.

    Shaw, R. H. et al. Heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination: initial reactogenicity data. Lancet397, 2043–2046 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01115-6

  10. 10.

    Abdool Karim SS, de Oliveira T. New SARS-CoV-2 variants—clinical, public health, and vaccine implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:1866-1868.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmc2100362

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and P.1 escape from neutralizing antibodies. Cell184, 2384–2393 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.036

  13. 13.

    Planas D, et al. Sensitivity of infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants to neutralizing antibodies. Nat. Med. 2021;27:917-924.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-021-01318-5

  14. 14.

    Abu-Raddad, L. J., Chemaitelly, H. & Butt, A. A. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. N. Engl. J. Med. 10.1056/NEJMc2104974 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmc2104974

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Madhi, S. A. et al. Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1885–1898 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2102214

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Behrens GMN, et al. Perceived versus proven SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in health-care professionals. Infection. 2020;48:631-634.

    Not in our library10.1007/s15010-020-01461-0

  19. 19.

    Bošnjak, B. et al. Low serum neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody levels in mildly affected COVID-19 convalescent patients revealed by two different detection methods. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 936-944 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41423-020-00573-9

  20. 20.

    Liu Y, et al. Neutralizing activity of BNT162b2-elicited serum. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:1466-1468.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmc2102017

  21. 21.
  22. 22.

    Jablonka, A. et al. Protocol for longitudinal assessment of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in healthcare professionals in Hannover, Germany: the prospective, longitudinal, observational COVID-19 Contact (CoCo) study. Preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.02.20242479v1.full (2020).

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.