Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Lysine l-lactylation is the dominant lactylation isomer induced by glycolysis

Di Zhang, Jinjun Gao, Zhijun Zhu and 14 more

Nature Chemical Biology · 2024 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41589-024-01680-8

Abstract

Lysine l -lactylation (K l -la ) is a novel protein posttranslational modification (PTM) driven by l -lactate. This PTM has three isomers: K l -la , N -ε-(carboxyethyl)-lysine (K ce ) and d -lactyl-lysine (K d -la ), which are often confused in the context of the Warburg effect and nuclear presence. Here we introduce two methods to differentiate these isomers: a chemical derivatization and high-performance liquid chromatography analysis for efficient separation, and isomer-specific antibodies for high-selectivity identification. We demonstrated that K l -la is the primary lactylation isomer on histones and dynamically regulated by glycolysis, not K d -la or K ce , which are observed when the glyoxalase system was incomplete. The study also reveals that lactyl-coenzyme A, a precursor in l -lactylation, correlates positively with K l -la levels. This work not only provides a methodology for distinguishing other PTM isomers, but also highlights K l -la as the primary responder to glycolysis and the Warburg effect.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Main

Histones undergo a variety of posttranslational modifications (PTMs), which can have substantial effects on chromatin activities. Certain histone PTMs are regulated by cellular metabolites–, which can either act as cofactors (or precursors) for PTM-catalyzing enzymes or can directly mediate PTMs that are not added enzymatically,. For example, acetylation and methylation on lysine are driven by acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) and S-adenosylmethionine, respectively,, while NAD+ and α-ketoglutarate are cofactors for enzymes that remove these marks. These metabolite-sensitive histone PTMs exemplify the interconnection of metabolism and epigenetic regulation,,.

We recently discovered a histone PTM called lysine lactylation (originally Kla, but hereafter Kl-la) that is induced by glycolysis-derived l-lactate. We suggested that lactyl-CoA is the high-energy intermediate connecting l-lactate and Kl-la formation. Our research revealed that the acetyltransferase p300 can use chemically synthesized lactyl-CoA as a cofactor for enzymatic histone Kl-la formation, while HDAC 1–3 (refs.,) as well as SIRT2 (ref. ) can catalyze the lysine delactylation. Although the enzymatic source of lactyl-CoA remains unknown, Varner et al. quantified lactyl-CoA in mammalian cell and tissue samples. Nevertheless, it remains unknown whether other high-energy metabolites contribute to histone Kl-la in vivo.

After our report on histone Kl-la, its stereoisomeric modification lysine d-lactylation (originally called lactoylation, but hereafter Kd-la) was subsequently discovered. Kd-la is formed by an uncatalyzed reaction between proteins and S-d-lactoylglutathione (LGSH), which is produced through the glyoxalase pathway, (Fig. 1). The glyoxalase pathway involves two enzymes: glyoxalase 1 (GLO1) and glyoxalase 2 (GLO2). GLO1 conjugates methylglyoxal (MGO), a byproduct of glycolysis, to glutathione to form LGSH, which is then hydrolyzed by GLO2 to produce d-lactate and regenerate cellular glutathione. MGO is highly reactive (its physiological concentration is about 0.1–2 µM) and is known to react with a variety of protein residues, including cysteine, arginine and lysine. One of the MGO adducts, N-ε-(carboxyethyl)-lysine (Kce hereafter, shown in Fig. 1), has been reported on histones, but at much lower levels than MGO-derived modifications on arginine residues. Due to their identical molecular weights and structural similarity, Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce cannot currently be differentiated by high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS) analysis. Therefore, Brookes and Muller groups raised concerns regarding the identity of Kla modification and presence of lactyl-CoA. They also suggest the direct chemical reaction between lysine’s amine group and MGO and LGSH in cells,. In addition, it remains unclear whether Kd-la and Kce can respond to dynamic changes of cellular glycolysis in a similar fashion as Kl-la.

To address these fundamental questions, we undertook a thorough investigation to distinguish between the three modifications. Here we report our development and application of multiple orthogonal techniques, including analytical, chemical biological and immunological methods, to differentiate Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce. Our results provide compelling evidence for the distinct detection of these three modifications. Our findings reveal that only Kl-la is responsive to glycolysis in wild-type cells, corroborating our previous report.

PTM-specific antibodies differentiate Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce

We first developed immunological reagents that can distinguish Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce. We want to point out that the polyclonal pan anti-Kla antibodies we generated and used in our original paper were raised against Kl-la instead of Kd-la peptides as an antigen. Accordingly, the antibodies recognized Kl-la peptides and could detect a dose-dependent increase of Kl-la in response to glucose. In this study, we have developed second-generation rabbit monoclonal pan anti-Kl-la antibodies, as well as pan anti-Kd-la and pan anti-Kce antibodies, for the following experiments. To investigate whether these reagents can distinguish between Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce, we performed immunoblotting assays with three sets of PTM-specific antigens (Fig. 2a), including synthetic peptide libraries (Fig. 2b–d and Extended Data Fig. 1a–d), chemically modified bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Fig. 2e–g) and synthetic sequence-specific histone peptides (Fig. 2h–j). The purity and identity of these compounds were confirmed by either SDS–PAGE (Extended Data Fig. 1e) or HPLC with tandem MS (MS/MS) (Extended Data Fig. 1f–i and Supplementary Figs. 1–6). Immunoblotting results showed that pan anti-Kl-la, pan anti-Kd-la and pan anti-Kce antibodies were specific for their corresponding PTMs, with at least 50-fold preference over the other modifications (Fig. 2b–j).

HPLC separates Kce-peptides from Kl-la or Kd-la

To distinguish Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce by orthogonal methods, we performed HPLC experiments. Stereoisomers with different configurations at just one stereocenter, such as Kl-la and Kd-la, are difficult to separate in a typical reversed-phase HPLC column (for example, a C18 column). However, constitutional isomers such as Kl/d-la versus Kce can possibly be separated by HPLC, as demonstrated in our previous study on 2-hydroxyisobutyryl lysine isomers. Using three groups of synthetic histone peptides containing one of the three isomers, we demonstrated that although the peptide pairs bearing either Kl-la or Kd-la could not be separated, they can be easily distinguished from their counterpart bearing Kce by reverse-phase HPLC (Fig. 3a,b and Extended Data Fig. 2a,b).

Chiral reaction and HPLC for Kl-la/Kd-la separation

Reverse-phase HPLC usually cannot resolve a peptide containing Kl-la from its counterpart bearing Kd-la. We sought to resolve Kl-la from Kd-la at the single amino acid level. This approach offers an advantage as it enables the comprehensive assessment of all peptides present within the cell without the need to synthesize numerous peptide standards. We hypothesized that it might be possible to separate PTM-containing amino acid pair, l-lactyl lysine and d-lactyl lysine, by HPLC if their difference in stereochemistry could be accentuated by introducing additional chiral chemical group. To test this hypothesis, we took advantage of the classic chiral derivatization reaction using Mosher’s acid chloride (MTPA-Cl), which has been widely used to differentiate chiral molecules and determine their stereo-configurations. As MTPA-Cl can react with both amine and hydroxyl groups, the reaction between MTPA-Cl and the two modified amino acids generates bis-derivatized products, (MTPA)2-Kl-la and (MTPA)2-Kd-la, respectively. The chiral difference is thus magnified, increasing the likelihood of chromatographic separation (Fig. 3c). To investigate this possibility, we first digested two synthetic peptides containing Kl-la or Kd-la into individual amino acids with leucine aminopeptidase. The resulting amino acids were derivatized by MTPA-Cl and then analyzed by HPLC–MS/MS (Fig. 3d). We found that (MTPA)2-Kl-la and (MTPA)2-Kd-la were well separated (Fig. 3e) and have the same fragmentation pattern in MS/MS (Fig. 3f). The above data demonstrate a proof of concept for distinguishing Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce by HPLC–MS.

Kl-la is predominant on histones, not Kd-la or Kce

Next, we investigated which out of KL-la, Kd-la and Kce is most common as a histone mark in cells. To improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the assay, we first cultured human MCF-7 cells in ‘heavy’ media (containing K8 [13C6, 15N2] heavy isotope-labeled l-lysine) and enriched cellular histone peptides bearing the PTMs of interest using pan anti-Kl-la, pan anti-Kd-la and pan anti-Kce antibodies. These enriched ‘heavy’ PTM-containing peptides were then mixed with synthetic ‘light’ (K0 [12C6, 14N2] light isotope-labeled l-lysine) Kl-la-, Kd-la- and Kce-containing peptide standards for subsequent HPLC–MS/MS analysis (Fig. 4a). The synthetic peptide standards consist of three sets of modified histone peptides with sequences of interest: GGK*GLGK (histone H4), QLATK*AAR (histone H3) and PELAK*SAPAPK (histone H2B). In these sequences, K* represents one of the following modifications: Kl-la, Kd-la or Kce. Our HPLC–MS/MS analysis showed that the cell-derived peptides exhibited the same HPLC retention time and MS/MS fragmentation patterns as the Kl/d-la standard peptides (Fig. 4b and Extended Data Figs. 3–5). However, their retention time did not align with the Kce standard peptides (Fig. 4b). These findings strongly indicate that Kl/d-la but not Kce is the predominant modification form on histones.

To investigate whether lactylation was present in the Kl-la or Kd-la form, we conducted a series of experiments. First, we digested the affinity-enriched ‘heavy’ peptides into single amino acid residues with leucine aminopeptidase. We then spiked in with ‘light’ Kl-la and Kd-la amino acid standards and performed chiral derivatization with MTPA-Cl (Fig. 4a). The chiral derivatization reaction introduced an additional chiral functional group that increases the stereochemical difference between Kl-la and Kd-la. The resulting reaction products were analyzed by HPLC–MS/MS. Our results showed that the reaction products derived from the cell samples coeluted with the Kl-la reaction products but not with the Kd-la reaction products (Fig. 4c,d). These results provide clear evidence that the predominant form of histone lactylation is the l form rather than the d form.

To corroborate these results, we carried out SILAC (stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture)-based quantitative MS analysis on histone Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce. In this experiment, human MCF-7 cells were cultured in ‘light’ and ‘heavy’ media for six cell doublings. The ‘light’ cells were treated with no glucose, while the ‘heavy’ cells were treated with high glucose for 24 hours. Following the treatment, equal numbers of the cells from both conditions were combined and subjected to histone extraction. The resulting histone samples were then digested into peptides using trypsin and subsequently enriched for each type of PTM-containing peptides using their corresponding PTM-specific antibodies (Fig. 4e). These experiments identified 62 Kl-la modified histone peptides that were induced by high glucose (Fig. 4f). We noted an intriguing observation that Kl-la on core histones, rather than linker histones, displayed a markedly more pronounced response to high glucose conditions. However, further studies are required to fully understand the underlying reasons for this observed difference. In contrast, under our experimental conditions, we did not detect any peptides bearing Kd-la or anti-Kce, when using anti-Kd-la or anti-Kce antibody for enriching their corresponding peptides. Our results indicate that Kd-la and Kce modifications on histones were not detectable from cells cultured in either low or high glucose. This result is consistent with previous studies showing that Kd-la or Kce are not present on histones in wild-type cells,.

In the above assays, we used antibody-based enrichment to increase the sensitivity for PTM detection. To further increase the rigor of these assays, we assessed the enrichment capability of the three antibodies by semiquantifying the intensities of three spiked-in modified peptides both before and after enrichment by each antibody (Extended Data Fig. 6a). Our data demonstrated that all three antibodies can efficiently enrich a small number of modified peptides among a large number of unmodified peptides, as evidenced by the spiking in of three sets of modified histone peptides (from H3, H4 and H2B, respectively) (Extended Data Fig. 6b). It is noteworthy that, unlike Kl-la, we were unable to detect any of these three peptides or any other modification sites on cellular histones bearing either Kd-la or Kce. Therefore, we propose that Kl-la, but not Kd-la or Kce, represents the main isomer of the three PTMs on cellular histones. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that histone Kd-la and Kce are present in cells, but their abundance was too low to be detected in our assays. Histone marks with low stoichiometries could potentially play significant roles in locus-specific regulation, such as H3K4 trimethylation, while it is less plausible for low-level nonnuclear PTMs to have a significant impact, especially in context of inhibiting an enzyme’s function.

In summary, our data showed that Kl-la is the dominant isomer among the three structural isomers of lysine lactylation on cellular histones.

Glycolysis differentially regulates Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce

Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce are all formed from precursors that are intermediates in glycolysis (Fig. 5a). Nevertheless, how the three PTMs are dynamically regulated in response to changes in glycolysis has not been systematically studied. To this end, we first cultured human MCF-7 cells in media containing different glucose concentrations and examined the cellular levels of these PTMs by western blot. We found that global Kl-la levels, on both histones and nonhistone proteins, were induced by glucose in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5b). In contrast, global Kd-la and Kce levels were largely unresponsive to extracellular glucose concentrations (Fig. 5b). To further validate this western blot result, we quantify the global levels of these three isomeric modifications in whole-cell protein lysates using LC–MS/MS after exhaustive removal of small molecules. For this purpose, we cultured MCF-7 cells in both ‘light’ and ‘heavy’ Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) media, for low glucose conditions (0.1 mM) and high glucose conditions (25 mM), respectively. The whole-cell protein lysates were generated from mixed cells (with equal numbers of ‘light’ and ‘heavy’ cells) and digested with trypsin. The resulting peptides were subjected to affinity enrichment to isolate the peptides bearing one of the three PTMs of interest using its corresponding antibody. The results from SILAC-based proteomic quantification revealed that under high glucose conditions, most Kl-la modified peptides exhibited an increase, while most Kd-la and Kce modified peptides showed no apparent alteration compared to low glucose conditions (Extended Data Fig. 7a). These findings were consistent with our western blot data.

Furthermore, we perturbed glycolysis by inhibiting enolase (ENO) or lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (Fig. 5a). We expected that inhibition of ENO activity by POMHEX (which was also suggested in Muller’s comments) would result in the entry of glucose-derived carbon into the glyoxalase pathway and simultaneously block lactate production. In contrast, inhibition of LDH activity may only abolish l-lactate production but not affect the glyoxalase pathway (Fig. 5a). We found that global Kl-la levels were decreased by POMHEX in a dose-dependent manner, while Kd-la levels were increased and Kce levels were marginally affected (Fig. 5c). In contrast, (R)-GNE-140 (ref. ), an inhibitor of LDH, reduced global Kl-la levels without affecting Kd-la or Kce levels (Fig. 5d).

The glyoxalase pathway is one of the most efficient systems for removing chemically reactive by-products such as MGO and LGSH from cellular metabolism. We next investigated whether Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce are regulated by the glyoxalase pathway. We generated GLO1-, GLO2- and GLO1/2-deficient human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells using the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (Extended Data Fig. 8a). After culturing these cells in media containing different glucose concentrations, we found that global Kl-la was responsive to glucose concentration, but not regulated by glyoxalases (Fig. 5e and Extended Data Fig. 8b–e). In contrast, global Kd-la was induced in the absence of GLO2, but it exhibited much lower sensitivity to changes in glucose concentration (Fig. 6e and Extended Data Fig. 8b–e). We did not observe an increase in global Kce levels in the absence of GLO1 (Fig. 6e and Extended Data Fig. 8b–e). It is possible that alternative pathways, such as aldose reductase, contribute to the removal of MGO in the absence of GLO1 (ref. ). It has been observed that cells deficient in GLO1 and cultured in high glucose media did not accumulate Kce or arginine adduct modifications due to compensatory mechanisms.

Together, these data suggest that Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce are differently regulated during glycolysis, and that the glyoxalase pathway prevents the formation of Kd-la and Kce in cells without affecting glycolysis-sensitive Kl-la.

Lactyl-CoA correlates with Kl-la in response to glycolysis

We previously proposed the existence of lactyl-CoA as a cofactor for cellular Kl-la formation. Some short-chain acyl-CoA synthetases are known to produce not only acetyl-CoA from acetate, but also propionyl-CoA from propionate and crotonyl-CoA from crotonate. Intracellular l-lactate is very abundant, and therefore it is possible that lactyl-CoA is formed by a similar mechanism. Supporting this hypothesis, Varner et al. recently showed the existence of lactyl-CoA in mammalian cells and tissues. Further, we demonstrated that acyltransferase p300 can use chemically synthesized lactyl-CoA as a cofactor for the in vitro enzymatic histone Kl-la reaction.

To test our hypothesis, we first confirmed the existence of lactyl-CoA in cultured cells (Fig. 6a,b). To examine the metabolic turnover of lactyl-CoA, we carried out isotope tracing experiments using 13C3-l-lactate and U-13C6-d-glucose, respectively. We found that both lactyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA were labeled very quickly by exogenous 13C3-l-lactate, with decreases in labeling after 4 hours (Fig. 6c). The decrease in isotope enrichment was probably due to dilution by 12C3 lactyl-CoA and 12C2 acetyl-CoA generated endogenously. We also noticed that maximal labeling of lactyl-CoA (near 100%) was much higher than that of acetyl-CoA (50–60%) (Fig. 6c). This may have occurred because l-lactate contributes differently to formation of lactyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA, or because the two acyl-CoAs have different half-lives in cells. Propionyl-CoA, which is not derived directly from l-lactate metabolism, was not isotopically labeled by 13C3-l-lactate under the same conditions (Fig. 6c).

Unlike 13C3-l-lactate, treating cells with U-13C6-d-glucose resulted in labeling of acetyl-CoA much faster than lactyl-CoA (Fig. 6d). This difference correlates well with our previous experiment in which histone Kl-la was labeled far more slowly than histone lysine acetylation (Kac) by U-13C6-d-glucose. Under the same conditions, we did not observe any labeling of propionyl-CoA by U-13C6-d-glucose (Fig. 6d). Together, these data demonstrate that lactyl-CoA can be metabolically derived from both l-lactate and glucose.

To examine whether lactyl-CoA is regulated by glycolysis and correlates with Kl-la levels, we measured lactyl-CoA in cells where ENO or LDH was blocked. We observed that lactyl-CoA levels were much lower on POMHEX treatment (Fig. 6e). Similarly, in LDH-deficient cells or cells treated with (R)-GNE-140, lactyl-CoA levels were much lower than those in control cells (Fig. 6f and Extended Data Fig. 9a). These data demonstrated that lactyl-CoA is dynamically regulated by glycolysis and is positively correlated with Kl-la levels (Fig. 6e,f).

In summary, we have successfully distinguished between the isomers Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce using both immunological and analytical chemical methods. Our results clearly demonstrate that, although all three modifications are associated with the glycolytic pathway, Kl-la is the dominant modification on cellular histones and the one that responds to changes in glycolysis.

Discussion

In this study, we used a combination of analytical and immunological methods to distinguish three isomeric protein modifications, Kl-la, Kd-la and Kce. Our data suggest that Kl-la is the prevalent isomer on cellular histones, and is responsive to glycolysis. In contrast, we could not detect Kd-la or Kce on histones by highly sensitive mass spectrometric analysis, even after enrichment. Our results corroborate those of Gaffney et al., who reported that the Kd-la modification is enriched on glycolytic enzymes, but not on nuclear proteins. The Kce modification has been reported on histones, but only in GLO1-deficient cells treated with exogenous MGO, but not in wild-type cells. The different distributions of the three PTMs on histones may be explained by their biochemical mechanisms. Kl-la, and in particular histone Kl-la, is thought to be primarily a modification catalyzed by acyltransferases (for example, p300) with lactyl-CoA as a cofactor. Like Kac, Kl-la is enriched on the N-terminal tails of core histones and in gene promoters throughout the genome. In contrast, Kd-la and Kce are produced by nonenzymatic reactions as a result of chemically reactive glycolytic by-products escaping from the cellular detoxification system. Since LGSH and MGO, the chemicals responsible for the production of Kd-la and Kce, respectively, are mainly produced in the cytosol, it makes sense that these two PTMs occur more frequently on cytosolic proteins that are exposed to these active compounds.

Unlike MGO and LGSH, l-lactate is largely a chemically inert molecule. Therefore, we proposed that lactyl-CoA is generated from l-lactate and acts as a high-energy intermediate for Kl-la formation, analogous to the relationship between acetyl-CoA and Kac. Although we here and others previously have confirmed the existence of lactyl-CoA in cells, these studies have not addressed the chirality of the detected lactyl-CoA. We argue that lactyl-CoA is in the l form, because it can be labeled by isotopic l-lactate and glucose, and because l-lactate is the major enantiomer in cells (present in millimolar concentration compared to about 10 µM for d-lactate). However, it is unknown whether d-lactyl-CoA can be formed from d-lactate in lower concentrations. Notably, the Galligan group recently reported that LGSH can undergo conversion to d-lactyl-CoA through a spontaneous S-to-S acyl transfer reactions, contributing to nonenzymatic lactylation (Kd-la) in GLO2-deficient cells. In addition, several interesting questions about l-lactyl-CoA remain to be investigated, such as how intracellular l-lactyl-CoA is produced and whether l-lactyl-CoA has any other metabolic functions independent of Kl-la formation.

The results presented here and in our previous study clearly demonstrate that the histone lysine lactylation we initially identified is actually Kl-la. This conclusion is supported by multiple lines of evidence: in wild-type cells, (1) histone Kla can be labeled and induced by isotopic l-lactate as we previously reported; (2) histone Kl-la is responsive to L-lactate and glucose metabolism; (3) KD-la and Kce cannot be detected on histones through affinity enrichment in combination with high-sensitivity MS; (4) the cellular l-lactate level is much higher than those of MGO, LGSH or d-lactate; (5) lactyl-CoA is well correlated with l-lactate and Kl-la, and is regulated by glycolysis and (6) histone Kl-la is enriched in specific genomic regions rather than randomly distributed on chromatin. The last observation strongly supports that Kl-la is caused by an enzyme-mediated process and not uncatalyzed chemical reactions such as the formation of Kd-la and Kce from LGSH and MGO, because the chemical reaction could be more random among the genomic regions. Since 2019, several enzymes including P300 (ref. ), CBP, MOF and YiaC, among others, have been identified to possess lactyltransferase activity. Understanding how these enzymes coordinate to regulate histone Kl-la under physiological conditions will be essential for future studies. Together, this study clearly addresses possible confusion in the research community about which of the three structural isomers, Kl-la, Kd-la or Kce, is responsible in glycolysis-derived lactylation.

Differentiation of structural isomers of a PTM is daunting. Such structural isomers are possible not only for Kla but also for other modifications. For example, β-hydroxybutyrylation theoretically can be present in two isomers, d-β-hydroxybutyrylation and l-β-hydroxybutyrylation, which could be generated from d-β-hydroxybutyryl-CoA and l-β-hydroxybutyryl-CoA, respectively. Here we report two independent bioanalytical methods for separation of the constitutional and stereochemical isomers of a PTM. We believe that the same approaches can be used to solve other challenges in differentiating and quantifying PTM structural isomers. Given that these chiral modifications are driven by distinct chiral metabolites in cells and they may be regulated by enzymes in different ways, as well as recognized by diverse recognition proteins (or ‘readers’), the ability to differentiate between stereoisomers of PTMs holds significant importance.

Reagents

Pan anti-KL-la (PTM-1401RM, 1:2,000 dilution for western blotting), pan anti-KD-la (ZC288, 1:1,500 dilution for western blotting) and pan anti-Kce (PTM-1701RM, 1:1,000 dilution for western blotting) antibodies were from PTM Biolabs, Inc.; anti-β-actin (no. 4970, 1:6,000 dilution for western blotting) and anti-histone H3 (no. 4499, 1:2,000 dilution for western blotting) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.; anti-GLO1 (A4329, 1:1,000 dilution for western blotting) was purchased from ABclonal; anti-GLO2 (12146-RP02, 1:1,000 dilution for western blotting) was purchased from Sino Biological; d-glucose (G7021), leucine aminopeptidase (L5006) and (R)-(−)-MTPA-Cl (65363) were purchased from MilliporeSigma; POMHEX (HY-131904) and (R)-GNE-140 (HY-100742A) were purchased from MedChemExpress; [13C6,15N2]-vitamin B5 (no. 5065) was purchased from Isosciences; 13C3-sodium l-lactate (CLM-1579-PK) and U-13C6-d-glucose (CLM-1396-1) were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories.

Synthesis of acetyl N-hydroxysuccinimide ester

N-hydroxysuccinimide (1.15 g, 10 mmol) was added to acetic anhydride (10 ml, 106 mmol), and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The mixture was filtered, the crystalline residue was extracted with hexane and reduced to dryness, and crude product was obtained. The crude product was confirmed by MS and used for chemical acetylation without further purification.

Synthesis of l (or d)-lactyl N-hydroxysuccinimide ester

l-lactic acid (0.9 g, 10 mmol) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (1.38 g, 12 mmol) were dissolved in dichloromethane and stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h. Then, N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) (2.27 g, 11 mmol) was added and stirring was continued at room temperature overnight. The resulting mixture was filtered, then the organic solution was washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate and brine, and then dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was obtained. The crude product was confirmed by MS and used for chemical lactylation without further purification.

Chemical acetylation, lactylation and N-ε-carboxyethylation

The procedures for chemical acetylation, lactylation and N-ε-carboxyethylation of BSA are described below. To prepare acetylated BSA, 0.1 mM acetyl N-hydroxysuccinimide ester was added to 0.5 mg of BSA (in 500 µl of PBS, pH 8.0). The pH of the solution was adjusted to 8–9 by adding 1 M NaOH. After 1 h, the reaction mixture was centrifuged in a 3 kDa ultrafiltration tube (12,000g, 4 min), and washed three times with PBS. Then the acetylated BSA was recovered and dissolved in PBS to a concentration of 2.5 mg ml−1. l- and d-lactylated BSA (2.5 mg ml−1) were obtained using analogous procedures. To prepare N-ε-carboxyethylated BSA, 10 mM sodium pyruvate was added to 0.5 mg of BSA (in 500 µl of water), and the mixture was kept at 37 °C on an Eppendorf thermomixer at 1,000 rpm for 1 h. Then, 40 µl of 0.6 M NaBH3CN was added, and the mixture was incubated for another hour. The reaction mixture was centrifuged in a 3 kDa ultrafiltration tube (12,000g, 4 min) and washed three times with PBS. N-ε-carboxyethylated BSA was recovered and dissolved in PBS to a concentration of 2.5 mg ml−1. Chemical modification of BSA by MGO was carried out as follows. One millimolar MGO was added to 0.5 mg BSA (in 500 µl of PBS, pH 8.0), and the pH of the mixture was adjusted to 8–9 by adding 1 M NaOH. The reaction was kept at 37 °C on an Eppendorf thermomixer at 1,000 rpm for 24 h. The reaction mixture was centrifuged in a 3 kDa ultrafiltration tube (12,000g, 4 min) and washed three times with PBS. The resulting BSA was dissolved in PBS to a concentration of 2.5 mg ml−1. Chemical lactylation and N-ε-carboxyethylation of synthetic peptides (or peptide libraries) were accomplished similarly. Chemically modified peptides were desalted with C18 columns, and then used for coelution experiments.

General methods

All reagents and solvents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification as obtained from commercial suppliers. HPLC–MS was performed on a Phenomenex Kinetex column (1.7 µm, 50 × 2.10 mm) using a Waters Acquity ultra-HPLC system. Gradient A with eluent I (0.1% HCOOH in H2O) and eluent II (0.1% HCOOH in MeCN) rising linearly from 0 to 95% of II was applied during t = 0‒5.20 min at a flow rate of 0.6 ml min−1. Preparative reversed-phase HPLC purification was performed on a C18 Phenomenex Luna column (5 μm, 100 Å, 250 × 20 mm) or a C18(2) Phenomenex Luna column (5 μm, 250 × 21.2 mm) using an Agilent 1260 LC system equipped with a diode array ultraviolet (UV) detector and an evaporative light scattering detector. Gradient B with eluent III (H2O/MeCN/trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 95:5:0.1, v-v:v) and eluent IV (0.1% TFA in MeCN) rising linearly from 0 to 20–25% of eluent IV was applied during t = 5–35 min at a flow rate of 20 ml min−1. Analytical HPLC of preparative fractions and of the final product were performed on a C18 Infinity Poroshell 120 column (2.7 µm, 100 × 3.0 mm) using an Agilent 1260 Infinity II series system equipped with a diode array UV detector using eluent III and eluent IV, rising linearly from 0 to 50% of eluent IV during t = 1–11 min at a flow rate of 1.2 ml min−1 at 40 °C. High-resolution MS (HRMS) was performed on a Bruker SolariX ESI (electrospray ionization) instrument.

Peptide synthesis

Here, 2-chlorotrityl resin (0.39 g, Iris Biotech, cat. no. BR-1060.0025, loading 1.55 mmol g−1) was swollen in CH2Cl2 (4 ml) for 5 min. Then, the solvent was removed by suction and the resin was incubated with a solution of Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-H or Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-H (0.38 mmol, 0.63 equiv.) and iPr2EtN (0.22 ml, 1.26 mmol, 2.1 equiv.) in CH2Cl2 (4 ml) for 2 h. Loaded resins were washed with CH2Cl2–MeOH–iPr2EtN (17:2:1, 3 × 5 ml), CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 ml), dimethylformamide (DMF) (2 × 5 ml) and CH2Cl2 (2 × 5 ml) and resin loading was determined following a standard procedure based on Fmoc group cleavage (Lys resin, 0.40 mmol g−1; Arg resin, 0.28 mmol g−1). Then, standard Fmoc/tBu solid-phase peptide synthesis was performed on a Biotage SyroWave automated synthesizer with protected amino acids; Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Glu(tBu)-OH, Fmoc-Gly-OH, Fmoc-Leu-OH, Fmoc-Lys(Alloc)-OH, Fmoc-Pro-OH, Fmoc-Ser(tBu)-OH and Fmoc-Thr(tBu)-OH, and Boc-Gly-OH, Boc-Gln(Trt)-OH and Boc-Pro-OH for the final coupling. The syntheses were performed on a 50 µmol scale and Fmoc deprotection steps were performed twice with piperidine–DMF (first 2:3 (v:v), 3 min; then 1:4 (v:v), 12 min), followed by washing of the resin with DMF (5 × 45 s). Coupling reactions were performed with Fmoc-Xaa-OH in DMF (400 µl, 0.4 M, 4.0 equiv.), HBTU in DMF (420 µl, 0.38 M, 4.0 equiv.) and iPr2NEt in NMP (200 µl, 1.6 M, 8.0 equiv.) for 40 min, followed by washing with DMF (3 × 45 s).

On-resin Alloc deprotection was achieved by addition of borane dimethylamine complex (14.7 mg, 0.250 mmol, 5.0 equiv.) and Pd(PPh3)4 (5.8 mg, 0.005 mmol, 0.1 equiv.) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (2.5 ml) to the resin (2 × 15 min, room temperature, with 2 × 4 ml of CH2Cl2 wash in between deprotections). Resins were then washed with CH2Cl2 (3 × 4 ml), DMF (3 × 4 ml) and CH2Cl2 (3 × 4 ml).

Formation of the Kce side chain modification was performed by incubation of the resin with 2-bromopropionic tert-butyl ester (41.5 µl, 0.250 mmol, 5.0 equiv.) and iPr2Net (43.5 µl, 0.250 mmol, 5.0 equiv.) in DMF (2.5 ml) at 65 °C (5 h), followed by washing with DMF (3 × 4 ml) and CH2Cl2 (3 × 4 ml). Formation of the Kd-la modification was performed on a 25 µmol scale by addition of d-lactic acid (11.3 mg, 0.125 mmol, 5.0 equiv.), HATU (46.7 mg, 0.123 mmol, 4.9 equiv.) and iPr2NEt (35 µl, 0.200 mmol, 8.0 equiv.) in DMF (1.25 ml) at room temperature (2 × 45 min), followed by washing with DMF (3 × 4 ml) and CH2Cl2 (3 × 4 ml).

Cleavage and global deprotection was achieved with TFA–H2O–iPr3SiH, (95:2.5:2.5, v-v:v) for 2 h at room temperature, followed by concentration under a stream of N2, trituration with ice-cold diethyl ether and centrifugation at 1,600g (3 min, room temperature). Supernatants were discarded and pellets were washed twice with ice-cold diethyl ether and dried under a stream of N2. Peptides were purified by preparative HPLC, and fractions containing the desired peptide were identified by HPLC–MS, lyophilized and final peptide purity was verified by analytical HPLC.

H4K8ce

(H-Gly-Gly-Lys(ce)-Gly-Leu-Gly-Lys-OH): tR = 2.60 min, 98% purity, 16% yield. HRMS, m/z [M+H]+ calculated for C29H54N9O10+ 688.39882, found 688.39953.

H3K23ce

(H-Gln-Leu-Ala-Thr-Lys(ce)-Ala-Ala-Arg-OH): tR = 3.33 min, 93% purity, 2% yield. HRMS, m/z [M+H]+ calculated for C39H72N13O13+ 930.53671, found 930.53783.

H2BK5ce

(H-Pro-Glu-Leu-Ala-Lys(ce)-Ser-Ala-Pro-Ala-Pro-Lys-OH): tR = 4.04 min, 99% purity, 31% yield. HRMS, m/z [M+H]+ calculated for C53H90N13O17+ 1180.65721, found 1180.65624.

H4K8(d-la)

(H-Gly-Gly-Lys(d-la)-Gly-Leu-Gly-Lys-OH): tR = 3.34 min, 98% purity, 7% yield. HRMS, m/z [M+H]+ calculated for C29H54N9O10+ 688.39882, found 688.39904.

H3K23(d-la)

(H-Gln-Leu-Ala-Thr-Lys(d-la)-Ala-Ala-Arg-OH): tR = 3.79 min, 94% purity, 20% yield. HRMS, m/z [M+H]+ calculated for C39H72N13O13+ 930.53671, found 930.53689.

H2BK5(d-la)

(H-Pro-Glu-Leu-Ala-Lys(d-la)-Ser-Ala-Pro-Ala-Pro-Lys-OH): tR = 4.39 min, 99% purity, 20% yield. HRMS, m/z [M+H]+ calculated for C53H90N13O17+ 1180.65721, found 1180.65721.

The HPLC traces of these peptides are shown in Supplementary Information.

Cells and cell culture

MCF-7, HEK293T and HepG2 cells were sourced from the American Type Culture Collection and were maintained in DMEM, which was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco). To generate GLO1-, GLO2- and GLO1/2-deficient HEK293T cell lines, cells were transfected with the pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP vector (Addgene no. 48138) expressing Cas9 and single-guide RNAs targeting exon 2 of GLO1 (AGGATCCTTCACTCGTAGCATGG) and exon 4 of GLO2 (TACGGGGGTGACGACCGTATCGG). Single-cell-derived clonal lines were screened and confirmed for GLO1 and GLO2 deficiency by sequencing with primers TTCCTAGTTAAGGCGGCACAGG (for GLO1) and ATGAAGGTAGAGGTGCTGCCTGC (for GLO2) and western blot analysis. The LDH-deficient HepG2 cell line was reported previously.

Stable isotope tracing

Human HepG2 cells were cultured in complete media (DMEM, high glucose, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% GlutaMAX). Before labeling by 13C3 sodium l-lactate, cells were washed once with warm PBS and replenished with fresh complete media. 13C3 sodium l-lactate (25 mM) was added into the media and cells were collected at indicated time points. To be labeled by U-13C6 d-glucose, cells were washed once with warm PBS and replenished with fresh media lacking glucose (DMEM, no glucose, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% GlutaMAX). U-13C6 d-glucose (25 mM) was added into the media and cells were collected at indicated time points.

Immunoblotting

For western blotting, whole-cell lysates (20 µg) were separated by 15% SDS–PAGE and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. For dot blotting, 1–1,000 ng of sample was spotted onto the nitrocellulose membrane and allowed to dry. The membranes were first blocked with a 3% solution of BSA in TBST (tris-buffered saline with Tween) (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) at room temperature for 1 h. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies, which were diluted in a solution containing 1% BSA in TBST, in a cold room environment overnight. After the primary antibody incubation, the membranes were thoroughly washed four times with TBST and then incubated with secondary antibodies (prepared in 1% BSA, TBST) at room temperature for 1 h. The membranes were then developed using a Konica film processor (SRX-101A).

Histone extraction

Histones from cultured human MCF-7 cells were extracted using a previously published method with minor modifications. Briefly, cell pellets from MCF-7 were suspended in cold extraction buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 0.34 M sucrose, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100) and incubated on ice for 30 min. After centrifugation (2,000g, 10 min), the resulting pellets were carefully resuspended in a no-salt buffer (3 mM EDTA and 0.2 mM EGTA) and incubated on ice for 30 min. Following this incubation, the samples were centrifuged again (6,500g, 5 min), and the resulting pellets were resuspended in a solution of 0.4 N H2SO4 and transferred to a cold room to incubate overnight. The supernatants were precipitated by adding 20% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid. The resulting precipitates contained histones and were washed twice with cold acetone and dried at 4 °C.

Peptide enrichment

Extracted histones were first digested into peptides by trypsin. The resulting peptides were incubated with nProtein A Sepharose beads (Cytiva) preconjugated with pan anti-Kl-la, pan anti-Kd-la or pan anti-Kl-la antibodies, or their mixture, in a cold room overnight. The beads were washed three times with NETN buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40), twice with ETN buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) and once with purified water to remove impurities. Peptides were eluted using 0.1% TFA and dried using a SpeedVac system (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

HPLC‒MS/MS conditions

Peptide samples were injected onto a custom-made C18-packed capillary column (12 cm length by 75 μm inner diameter, Dr. Maisch GmbH), and analyzed using an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer coupled with an EASY-nLC 1000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The HPLC used a gradient of 5–35% buffer B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) in buffer A (0.1% formic acid in water) over 20 min with a flow rate of 0.3 μl min−1. In positive-ion mode, full-scan mass spectra were acquired from m/z 300 to 1,400 at a resolution of 60,000. Data-dependent MS/MS was performed on the 15 most intense ions at a resolution of 15,000 using higher-energy collisional dissociation with parameters set for an isolation window of 2.0 m/z, charge 2+, collision energy 30% and dynamic exclusion after two occasions within 20 s.

Database searching

Data were collected by Xcalibur installed on the mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and MS/MS spectra were queried against the reverse, concatenated UniProt human FASTA database using ProLuCID. For histone samples, no modification was set to search ‘light’ peptides and a static modification for heavy lysine incorporation (+8.0142) was set to search ‘heavy’ peptides. The maximum missed cleavage site number was 2. For immunoprecipitation samples, the database search was performed using the CHiMA 2.0 strategy. Specifically, four variable modifications (+72.02113 Da for Kl-la/Kd-la/Kce, +42.01056 Da for Kac, +14.01565 Da for lysine and arginine mono-methylation) were used to search ‘light’ peptides. An additional static modification for heavy lysine incorporation (+8.0142) was set to search ‘heavy’ peptides. The maximum missed cleavage site number was 4. The precursor and fragmentation tolerances were 10 and 40 ppm, respectively, for all searches. ProLuCID search results were filtered and assembled by DTASelect v.2.0 (ref. ) with a criterion of at least 1% FDR or more than 50% b/y ion coverage, for histone data searches and immunoprecipitation data searches. Quantification of heavy/light ratios was performed by CIMAGE. The peptide-spectrum matches for all quantified Kl-la peptides were manually verified.

Chiral derivatization assay

Immunoprecipitated peptides were digested into amino acids by leucine aminopeptidase (3.6 µl, 0.5 U) in 100 µl of buffer (5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NH4HCO3, pH 7.9) at 37 °C for 24 h. The mixture was filtered using a 3 kDa centrifugal filter (MilliporeSigma) to collect free amino acids in the eluted solution, which was evaporated to dryness in a vacuum centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For chemical derivatization of lactyl lysine standards or digested samples, 1 µg of standards or dried samples was first reconstituted in 100 µl of anhydrous solution containing acetonitrile:pyridine (9:1, v:v). (R)-(−)-MTPA-Cl (1 µl), the derivatization reagent, was added to the solution and the reaction mixture was gently vortexed for 2 h at room temperature. After the reaction, the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000g. The supernatant was desalted with C18 Zip-tips (Waters Corporation), evaporated to dryness in a vacuum centrifuge and stored at −80 °C before analysis. Heavy lysine-labeled samples were spiked with nonisotopic d- and l-lactyl lysine standards, and then analyzed in a Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer equipped with a Dionex Ultimate 3000 nanoLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

HPLC–MS/MS conditions

A 15 cm long, 75 μm inner diameter in-house-packed Bridged Ethylene Hybrid C18 (1.7 μm, 130 Å, Waters Corporation) column was used for HPLC separation. The mobile phases used in the experiments were buffer A (0.1% formic acid in water) and buffer B (0.1% formic acid in water acetonitrile). The HPLC gradient was set as follows: 0–18.33 min, 3% buffer B; 18.33–28 min 3–40% buffer B; 28–58 min, 40–64% buffer B; 58–63 min, 64–95% buffer B; 63–83 min, 95% buffer B and 83–93 min, 95–3% buffer B. The flow rate was 300 nl min−1. MS was operated in the parallel reaction monitoring mode using negative electrospray ionization mode for data acquisition. MS1 spectra were collected over the m/z range of 300–800 at a mass resolution of 120,000. Targeted MS2 spectra were collected over the m/z range of 60–800 at a mass resolution of 15,000, triggered by a scheduled inclusion list. Fragmentation was conducted by higher-energy collisional dissociation with collision energy value set at 20% normalized collision energy after optimization. Both MS1 and MS2 spectra were collected using the Orbitrap with a maximum automatic gain control value of 5.0 × 105.

Lactyl-CoA analysis and LC–MS quantification

Lactyl-CoA was quantified by LC–MS/MS as previously described. Briefly, HepG2 cell pellets were collected in 1 ml of 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid at 4 °C, then frozen and shipped for analysis. Fifty microliters of 13C315N1 acyl-CoA mix were added as an internal standard, which was prepared as previously described from 13C315N1 pantothenate in yeast culture. Samples were mixed, sonicated and centrifuged at 17,000g at 4 °C for 10 min. To extract metabolites from the resulting supernatant, Oasis HLB solid phase extraction cartridges (Waters Corporation) were washed with 1 ml of methanol and equilibrated with 1 ml of water. The sample was loaded and desalted with 1 ml of water and eluted with 1 ml of eluting buffer (25 mM ammonium acetate in methanol). The eluent was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen gas, and then resolubilized in 50 µl of 5% (w/v) 5-sulfosalicylic acid in water. Ten microliters of the sample were injected into an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system with an HSS T3 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 3.5 µm Waters Corporation) and connected to a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The analysis used a flow rate of 0.2 ml min−1 and a gradient elution starting with 100% buffer A (5 mM ammonium acetate in water) for 3 min, then 20% buffer B (5 mM ammonium acetate in acetonitrile:water, 95:5) for 2 min, followed by 100% B for 7 min. After washing with buffer C (acetonitrile:water:formic acid, 80:20:0.1) at 0.275 ml min−1 for 3.5 min, the system re-equilibrated with 100% A for 5 min. Lactyl-CoA was analyzed in single-ion monitoring or data-independent acquisition mode using the [M+H]+ ion in full scan or the [M-507+H]+ product ion with a 5 ppm window with TraceFinder v.4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Absolute amounts were calculated from linear calibration curves that were created by serial dilution of synthetically prepared lactyl-CoA. Sample preparation and analysis of calibration were identical to the unknown samples. Analysts were blinded to sample identity during sample preparation and analysis.

Graphing and statistical analyses

GraphPad Prism v.9 software was used for graphing and statistical analysis. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). For comparison between two groups, datasets were analyzed by a two-tailed Student’s t-test. For data involving two independent variables, we employed a two-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41589-024-01680-8.

References 42

  1. 1.

    Allis CD, Jenuwein T. The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016;17:487-500.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg.2016.59

  2. 2.

    Sabari BR, Zhang D, Allis CD, Zhao YM. Metabolic regulation of gene expression through histone acylations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;18:90-101.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm.2016.140

  3. 3.

    Dai Z, Ramesh V, Locasale JW. The evolving metabolic landscape of chromatin biology and epigenetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020;21:737-753.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41576-020-0270-8

  4. 4.

    Li X, Egervari G, Wang Y, Berger SL, Lu Z. Regulation of chromatin and gene expression by metabolic enzymes and metabolites. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:563-578.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41580-018-0029-7

  5. 5.

    Walsh CT, Garneau-Tsodikova S, Gatto GJ. Protein posttranslational modifications: the chemistry of proteome diversifications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2005;44:7342-7372.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200501023

  6. 6.

    Maksimovic I, David Y. Non-enzymatic covalent modifications as a new chapter in the histone code. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2021;46:718-730.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2021.04.004

  7. 7.

    Moellering RE, Cravatt BF. Functional lysine modification by an intrinsically reactive primary glycolytic metabolite. Science. 2013;341:549-553.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1238327

  8. 8.

    Su XY, Wellen KE, Rabinowitz JD. Metabolic control of methylation and acetylation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2016;30:52-60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.030

  9. 9.

    Diehl KL, Muir TW. Chromatin as a key consumer in the metabolite economy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020;16:620-629.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41589-020-0517-x

  10. 10.

    Etchegaray JP, Mostoslavsky R. Interplay between metabolism and epigenetics: a nuclear adaptation to environmental changes. Mol. Cell. 2016;62:695-711.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.029

  11. 11.

    Zhang D, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574:575-580.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1

  12. 12.

    Moreno-Yruela C, et al. Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1-3) are histone lysine delactylases. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabi6696.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.abi6696

  13. 13.

    Zessin M, et al. Uncovering robust delactoylase and depyruvoylase activities of HDAC isoforms. ACS Chem. Biol. 2022;17:1364-1375.

    Not in our library10.1021/acschembio.1c00863

  14. 14.

    Jennings EQ, et al. Sirtuin 2 regulates protein lactoyllys modifications. Chem. Bio. Chem. 2021;22:2102-2106.

    Not in our library10.1002/cbic.202000883

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Gaffney DO, et al. Non-enzymatic lysine lactoylation of glycolytic enzymes. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020;27:206-213.e6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.11.005

  17. 17.

    Trujillo MN, et al. Lactoylglutathione promotes inflammatory signaling in macrophages through histone lactoylation. Mol. Metab. 2024;81:101888.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmet.2024.101888

  18. 18.

    Rabbani N, Xue M, Thornalley PJ. Activity, regulation, copy number and function in the glyoxalase system. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014;42:419-424.

    Not in our library10.1042/bst20140008

  19. 19.

    Thornalley PJ. The glyoxalase system: new developments towards functional characterization of a metabolic pathway fundamental to biological life. Biochem. J. 1990;269:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj2690001

  20. 20.

    Galligan JJ, et al. Methylglyoxal-derived posttranslational arginine modifications are abundant histone marks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:9228-9233.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1802901115

  21. 21.

    Kulkarni, C. A. & Brookes, P. Many routes from glycolysis to histone PTMs. Preprint at OSF10.31219/osf.io/sba8j (2020).

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Khadha, S., Barekatain, Y. & Muller, F. Re-evaluating the mechanism of histone lactylation. Preprint at OSF10.31219/osf.io/kyab5 (2020).

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Dai L, et al. Lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation is a widely distributed active histone mark. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:365-370.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1497

  24. 24.

    Hoye TR, Jeffrey CS, Shao F. Mosher ester analysis for the determination of absolute configuration of stereogenic (chiral) carbinol carbons. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2:2451-2458.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2007.354

  25. 25.

    Lin YH, et al. An enolase inhibitor for the targeted treatment of ENO1-deleted cancers. Nat. Metab. 2020;2:1413-1426.

    Not in our library10.1038/s42255-020-00313-3

  26. 26.

    Boudreau A, et al. Metabolic plasticity underpins innate and acquired resistance to LDHA inhibition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016;12:779-786.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.2143

  27. 27.

    Vander Jagt DL, Hunsaker LA. Methylglyoxal metabolism and diabetic complications: roles of aldose reductase, glyoxalase-I, betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase and 2-oxoaldehyde dehydrogenase. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2003;143-144:341-351.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0009-2797(02)00212-0

  28. 28.

    Morgenstern J, et al. Loss of glyoxalase 1 induces compensatory mechanism to achieve dicarbonyl detoxification in mammalian Schwann cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:3224-3238.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m116.760132

  29. 29.

    Yoshimura Y, Araki A, Maruta H, Takahashi Y, Yamashita H. Molecular cloning of rat acss3 and characterization of mammalian propionyl-CoA synthetase in the liver mitochondrial matrix. J. Biochem. 2017;161:279-289.

    Not in our library10.1093/jb/mvw067

  30. 30.

    Sabari BR, et al. Intracellular crotonyl-CoA stimulates transcription through p300-catalyzed histone crotonylation. Mol. Cell. 2015;58:203-215.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.029

  31. 31.

    Adeva-Andany M, et al. Comprehensive review on lactate metabolism in human health. Mitochondrion. 2014;17:76-100.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mito.2014.05.007

  32. 32.

    Levitt MD, Levitt DG. Quantitative evaluation of d-lactate pathophysiology: new insights into the mechanisms involved and the many areas in need of further investigation. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2020;13:321-337.

    Not in our library10.2147/ceg.s260600

  33. 33.

    Chen Y, et al. Metabolic regulation of homologous recombination repair by MRE11 lactylation. Cell. 2024;187:294-311.e21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.022

  34. 34.

    Xie B, et al. KAT8-catalyzed lactylation promotes eEF1A2-mediated protein synthesis and colorectal carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2024;121:e2314128121.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2314128121

  35. 35.
  36. 36.

    Moreno-Yruela C, Baek M, Monda F, Olsen CA. Chiral posttranslational modification to lysine epsilon-amino groups. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:1456-1466.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00115

  37. 37.

    Xie Z, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lysine beta-hydroxybutyrylation. Mol. Cell. 2016;62:194-206.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.036

  38. 38.

    Xu T, et al. ProLuCID: an improved SEQUEST-like algorithm with enhanced sensitivity and specificity. J. Proteom. 2015;129:16-24.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.001

  39. 39.

    Gao J, et al. Identification of 113 new histone marks by CHiMA, a tailored database search strategy. Sci. Adv. 2023;9:eadf1416.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.adf1416

  40. 40.

    Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Yates JR. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2002;1:21-26.

    Not in our library10.1021/pr015504q

All 42 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.