Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on Sep 23, 2024.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 27, 2026 · Read the notice

Birth of protein folds and functions in the virome

Jason Nomburg, Erin E. Doherty, Nathan Price and 3 more

Nature · 2024 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07809-y

Abstract

The rapid evolution of viruses generates proteins that are essential for infectivity and replication but with unknown functions, due to extreme sequence divergence 1 . Here, using a database of 67,715 newly predicted protein structures from 4,463 eukaryotic viral species, we found that 62% of viral proteins are structurally distinct and lack homologues in the AlphaFold database 2,3 . Among the remaining 38% of viral proteins, many have non-viral structural analogues that revealed surprising similarities between human pathogens and their eukaryotic hosts. Structural comparisons suggested putative functions for up to 25% of unannotated viral proteins, including those with roles in the evasion of innate immunity. In particular, RNA ligase T-like phosphodiesterases were found to resemble phage-encoded proteins that hydrolyse the host immune-activating cyclic dinucleotides 3′,3′- and 2′,3′-cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP). Experimental analysis showed that RNA ligase T homologues encoded by avian poxviruses similarly hydrolyse cGAMP, showing that RNA ligase T-mediated targeting of cGAMP is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of immune evasion that is present in both bacteriophage and eukaryotic viruses. Together, the viral protein structural database and analyses presented here afford new opportunities to identify mechanisms of virus–host interactions that are common across the virome.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Main

Viral proteins carry out functions that are critical for infection. Some proteins or their component domains are widely conserved within and across viral families, including between viruses of distinct Baltimore classifications and in viruses that infect different kingdoms of life,. These include ‘viral hallmark genes’, such as the jellyroll folds of viral capsid proteins and folds related to RNA- and DNA-directed RNA polymerases,. However, a major challenge to understanding viral infection mechanisms and evolution is the high percentage of viral proteins with unknown function. Sequence similarity between viral proteins and other viral or non-viral proteins can sometimes suggest protein functions, but the rapid pace of viral evolution and de novo emergence of genes generate many proteins without annotated sequence homologues. This creates a pressing need for alternative approaches to identify protein analogues.

Viral proteins are highly divergent even within the same virus family, limiting the utility of sequence-based similarity searches– when amino acid identity falls below 30%. By contrast, horizontal gene transfer among viruses and between viruses and cells creates structural relationships that can inform about protein function if they can be detected,,. However, viral proteins have limited representation among experimentally determined structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and they are absent from the predicted protein structures in the AlphaFold database,,.

To address this gap and develop a means to systematically predict viral protein functions, we generated a database of predicted structures from 67,715 proteins encoded by 4,463 species of eukaryotic viruses. We clustered these proteins by sequence and structure, generating 5,770 multi-member and 12,422 singleton clusters. Structural similarity searches greatly expanded the taxonomic diversity of protein clusters, revealing putative protein functions by connecting unannotated viral proteins with annotated analogues. Structural comparisons between viral and non-viral proteins identified potential functions of proteins encoded by human pathogens. In particular, RNA ligase T (LigT)-like phosphodiesterases (PDEs) emerged from this analysis as a widespread class of enzymes that is conserved across the bacterial and eukaryotic virome. Conservation evident within our viral protein structure database, together with enzymatic activities validated in cell-based experiments, reveal an ancient and fundamental role of these proteins in viral anti-immunity pathways.

The proteome of eukaryotic viruses

To analyse the diversity of protein structures present in eukaryotic viruses, we used ColabFold to predict the structures of 67,715 proteins from eukaryotic viruses included in RefSeq based on viral multisequence alignments (MSAs) (Methods). We then implemented a two-step approach to cluster them, using both sequence-based and structure-based clustering (Fig. 1a). We used MMseqs2 to cluster protein sequences to 70% coverage and 20% identity, resulting in 21,913 sequence clusters. Next, we leveraged the alignment speed of Foldseek to conduct structural alignments between a single representative of each sequence cluster and filtered alignments to keep those with at least 70% alignment coverage, a TMscore of at least 0.4, and an E-value lower than 0.001. The resultant structural alignments had a median TMscore of 0.52 (Extended Data Fig. 1a), reflecting robust structural similarity. The 70% alignment coverage threshold enriches clusters for members that are similar across the majority of their protein sequence. Cumulatively, this resulted in 18,192 protein clusters, of which 12,422 have a single member (Extended Data Fig. 1b). This dataset includes a large diversity of viruses, including 4,463 species from 132 different viral families (Fig. 1b). Clusters are structurally consistent, as implementing DALI to align cluster representatives to each member for clusters with at least 100 members yields a median cluster-average DALI z-score of 13.1 (Extended Data Fig. 1c). DALI z-scores above 8 indicate that 2 proteins are likely to be homologous. Proteins in single-member clusters have substantially lower predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) values than those in non-singleton clusters (Extended Data Fig. 2a), suggesting that structure prediction quality has a major impact on our ability to detect structural similarity. We tested whether MSA generation against a larger reference database has an effect on prediction quality. We found that whereas singletons have a lower average MSA depth that correlates with their lower pLDDT, this alternative MSA generation led to negligible effect on structure prediction quality (Extended Data Fig. 2b–d).

We investigated how well this database represents viral diversity, and if it reconstitutes core viral hallmark genes. We grouped viral families into viral genome types based on the basis of their Baltimore classes with slight modifications—DNA viruses were split into large, medium and small groupings on the basis of their average genome length, whereas RNA viruses without single-stranded positive-sense or negative-sense genomes were grouped into the RNA (other) category. Large double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses have the most protein clusters per species and, despite constituting only 14 of the 132 viral families in the dataset, account for the majority of viral proteins (Fig. 1d,f). As expected, protein cluster count correlates strongly with genome size (Extended Data Fig. 1d). With their larger genomes, dsDNA viruses have the capacity to encode more auxiliary genes without sacrificing genome stability. RNA viruses make up a large fraction of the families present in the dataset, but a smaller fraction of the total proteins (Fig. 1e,f). Structural similarity between viral families with a similar genome type is common, with large dsDNA viruses sharing many protein folds (Extended Data Fig. 1e).

As expected, the predominant protein clusters in the dataset as a whole (Extended Data Fig. 1f) and within each genome type (Fig. 1g) are largely involved in fundamental aspects of the viral life cycle. These include the single jellyroll fold, which comprises viral capsids and is present in viruses of many genome types. The double jellyroll fold also comprises viral capsids, although it is restricted to dsDNA viruses. RNA viral families often encode nucleocapsids, responsible for packaging of viral RNA, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerases responsible for genome replication. Although the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is universally conserved in RNA viruses, it is split among multiple protein clusters owing to variation in protein length. By contrast, small dsDNA viruses such as papillomaviruses and polyomaviruses encode a viral replicase with conserved origin binding and helicase domains. Altogether, we find that our structural database successfully reconstitutes conserved viral proteins across diverse viral subtypes.

We next investigated the taxonomic distribution of viral protein clusters. We performed structural alignments of viral protein cluster representatives against 2.3 million cluster representatives from the entire AlphaFold database (Fig. 1h). For each virus protein cluster, we determined the last common ancestor of viruses that encode a cluster member. We found that 29% of protein clusters are present in multiple viral families, the majority of which are present in the AlphaFold database, suggesting that they are evolutionarily ancient (Fig. 1i). In addition, we found that 62% of viral proteins (or 55% of proteins from non-singleton clusters) are restricted to a single viral family and lack analogues in the AlphaFold database (Fig. 1i). This shows that viral evolution generates substantial numbers of novel proteins that are absent from current structure databases.

Similarities between viral proteins

We investigated the ability of structural alignments to identify relationships that are not apparent from protein sequence alone. We found that many representatives of sequence clusters are structurally similar despite low sequence similarity (Fig. 2a). Adding structural information to protein clustering efforts leads to more taxonomically diverse protein clusters, with significantly more viral families per cluster (Fig. 2b). This is especially important for finding similarity between proteins from divergent viruses, resulting in a substantial increase in protein clusters that encompass proteins encoded by viruses of different genome types (Fig. 2c).

We explored whether structural alignments can link poorly annotated sequence clusters with those that are more annotated (Fig. 2d). We used the sequence-based classifier InterProScan to assign all proteins Pfam, Conserved Domain Database (CDD) and TIGRFAM classifications. Sequence clusters contain almost entirely InterProScan-annotated or entirely unannotated members, resulting in a bimodal distribution of sequence clusters (Fig. 2e). Of the proteins in clusters with more than 1 member, more than 25% of unannotated proteins are located in either an annotated sequence cluster or a protein cluster that contains an annotated sequence cluster (Fig. 2f).

Many protein clusters encompass a mixture of annotated and unannotated sequence clusters (Extended Data Fig. 3a). We find that these connections between sequence clusters are useful to determine putative functions of poorly characterized proteins across the virome. For example, although the single jellyroll fold is the most abundant protein cluster, many members of this cluster are not correctly annotated (Extended Data Fig. 3b). Many other protein clusters include both annotated and unannotated sequence clusters, including clusters encoding enzymes such as nucleotide-phosphate kinases (Extended Data Fig. 3c), NUDIX hydrolases (Extended Data Fig. 3d), DNA ligases (Extended Data Fig. 3f) and nucleases (Extended Data Fig. 3g). One cluster of note includes members that resemble the UL43 family of late herpesvirus proteins (Extended Data Fig. 3e), which will be discussed later.

We next investigated DNA-binding proteins, which have biotechnology applications in diagnostics and genome editing. First, we investigated TATA-binding proteins (TBPs), which bind to TATA-box motifs in eukaryotic promoters. Many DNA viruses target human TBP to promote viral gene expression or modulate host gene expression,. So far, three families of large dsDNA viruses have been found to encode viral TBPs. We found evidence of these proteins in four additional families of large dsDNA viruses (Fig. 2g), substantially expanding the diversity of virus-encoded TBPs. Next, we investigated the I3L family of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding proteins encoded by poxviruses (Fig. 2h). I3L potently and specifically binds ssDNA and is thought to be a DNA-binding protein involved in viral DNA replication or repair. There is no experimental structure of I3L, and its link to other protein folds and families remains unknown. We find that I3L contains an oligonucleotide-binding fold (OB-fold), similar to the baculovirus DNA-binding protein DBP and phage T7 single-stranded binding protein (SSB), consistent with the shared ssDNA-binding behaviour of these proteins,. We confirm the presence of similar OB-fold proteins across four additional dsDNA virus families, showing that Poxvirus I3L represents a widespread family of ssDNA-binding proteins. These eukaryotic dsDNA virus OB-folds contain a distinctive N-terminal beta sheet that is absent in the other baculovirus-encoded OB-fold protein, LEF-3 (Fig. 2i). Together, these results demonstrate that large-scale clustering based on sequence plus predicted structure enables functional inference of poorly characterized viral proteins.

Similarity to non-viral proteins

Unlike nucleotide or protein sequence, structural features are often conserved over large evolutionary timescales. Thus, we investigated whether alignment between predicted viral and non-viral protein structures can offer insight into the function of poorly annotated proteins encoded by human pathogens. To do this, we used Foldseek to align our virus protein structure database with the initial release of the AlphaFold database, which contains more than 500,000 proteins from 48 organisms across eukaryotes, bacteria and archaea (Fig. 3a). This revealed pervasive structural similarity between viral and non-viral proteins, with high structural similarity in the face of low amino acid identity (Fig. 3b).

Ultimately, 14,531 predicted viral proteins have an alignment to a member of the AlphaFold database, with the majority of alignments being against proteins encoded by eukaryotes (Fig. 3c). These alignments include proteins that are unannotated but are encoded by human pathogens. To reduce rates of false negatives, we conducted a series of alignments using DALI, which is slower than Foldseek but substantially more sensitive. First, we found that a set of proteins encoded by poxviruses are structurally similar to the auto-inhibitory domain of mammalian gasdermins, (Extended Data Fig. 4a). Similarly, several poxvirus proteins are structurally similar to the human galactosyltransferase COLGALT1, which is thought to enable virus binding to surface glycosaminoglycans during viral entry (Extended Data Fig. 4b). In addition, we observed structural similarity of Poxvirus C4-like proteins with eukaryotic dioxygenases (Extended Data Fig. 4c), consistent with previous work that identified frequent exaptation of inactivated host enzymes by poxviruses. Vaccinia virus C4 is notable for antagonizing several innate immune pathways. C4 directly binds the pattern recognition receptor DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), blocking DNA binding and immune signalling through that pathway. In addition, C4 inhibits NF-κB signalling downstream at or downstream of the IκB kinase (IKK) complex, but the mechanism of this inhibition is unknown. Further studies are required to determine whether its dioxygenase-like fold is involved in its innate immune antagonism.

Next, we found that human herpesviruses UL43-like proteins, including the protein BMRF2 from Epstein–Barr herpesvirus (EBV) and Varicella zoster virus (VZV), share structural similarity with the human equilibrative nucleoside transporter ENT4 (Extended Data Fig. 4d). We conducted structural alignments using DALI of EBV BMRF2 against proteins classified in the Transporter Classification Database (TCDB) (Fig. 3d). This revealed that BMRF2 has strong structural similarity to human equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT)-family transporters, with weaker similarity to related transporter families (Fig. 3e). We generated a phylogenetic tree of herpesvirus UL43-like proteins and related eukaryotic proteins, revealing that these proteins are widely distributed across herpesviruses (Fig. 3f). Notably, we identify a variant encoded by Felis catus gammaherpesvirus that maintains 36% sequence similarity to human ENT1, supporting the structural connection between these herpesviral proteins and ENT proteins. EBV substantially remodels host cell metabolism during viral infection, and this finding suggests a potential metabolic role in addition to BMRF2 involvement in viral attachment. In addition, transport of antiviral nucleoside analogues such as valacyclovir are mediated by nucleoside transporters, raising questions about the interplay between this protein and valacyclovir during VZV infection. These proteins belong to a cluster of proteins similar to the UL43 family of late herpesvirus proteins, some of which are unannotated (Extended Data Fig. 3e). Further experimental characterization is required to confirm the substrate(s) that are transported by these putative transporters. Together, these findings illustrate the ubiquity of structural similarity between viral and non-viral proteins and show that this similarity can be used to predict potential functions of poorly characterized viral proteins.

Although we found that some protein clusters contain members encoded by viruses of different genome types, the evolutionary origin of such conservation is unclear. Many of these protein clusters are predominantly encoded by viruses of a single genome type but are expressed in a small minority of viruses of a different genome type (Extended Data Fig. 5a). This observation is consistent with virus–virus or host–virus horizontal gene transfer. To explore this possibility, we conducted searches of sequence cluster representatives against viral and non-viral protein databases and constructed phylogenetic trees of the top hits. We found that nucleoside-phosphate kinases in cluster 28 show a polyphyletic distribution with homologues in different viruses showing amino acid similarity to distinct sets of non-viral proteins (Extended Data Fig. 5b). There is a similar pattern with HrpA/B-like helicases in cluster 55, with helicases in different viral families exhibiting amino acid similarity to distinct sets of non-viral organisms (Extended Data Fig. 5c). These patterns are consistent with horizontal gene transfer from non-viral hosts. By contrast, other taxonomically distributed protein clusters such as cluster 56 (encoding parvovirus Rep proteins with homologues in some human herpesviruses) and cluster 735 (encoding a haemagglutinin lineage that is present in baculoviruses and some orthomyxoviruses) display a monophyletic taxonomic distribution consistent with horizontal gene transfer between viruses (Extended Data Fig. 5d,e). These data suggest that many protein clusters that contain proteins from viruses of different genome types arise from horizontal gene transfer from both viral and non-viral sources.

Identification of shared domains

We constructed protein clusters with a strict 70% coverage requirement, leaving open the possibility that individual domains can be identified through structure comparison. We reasoned that protein domains that are present within multiple protein clusters may have particular biological importance. We used DALI to conduct all-by-all alignments of the representatives of all protein clusters having more than one member. This revealed substantial protein similarity with many alignments having z-scores greater than 8 (Extended Data Fig. 6a). Protein clusters ultimately fall into a network of shared domains (Extended Data Fig. 6b). Here we find that distinct domains are often shared across protein clusters in context with various combinations of other domains, which can be seen with domains involved in interaction with the cytoskeleton (Extended Data Fig. 6c) and in metabolism (Extended Data Fig. 6d,e) in eukaryotic viruses and phage.

Sensitivity of structural searches

We compared the sensitivity of our approach, which uses both sequence and structure, to methods that use only sequence information. First, we investigated the ability of sequence methods to reconstitute our viral protein clusters. For all protein clusters with at least two sequence clusters, we conducted all-by-all alignment with three different sequence methods. We then used connected-component clustering to identify clusters based on these methods (Extended Data Fig. 7a). We found that sequence methods fail to group all proteins into a single cluster (Extended Data Fig. 7b,c); jackhmmer, for example, identifies an average of more than two clusters for each single protein cluster generated by our sequence and structure method.

We next investigated the ability of sequence methods to identify similarities between viral and non-viral proteins. We first conducted sequence searches analogous to the DALI searches between non-viral and viral structures conducted in Extended Data Fig. 4, and quantified the fraction of the DALI alignments that are reconstituted by each sequence method. These sequence methods were unable to identify the vast majority of alignments (Extended Data Fig. 7d). Next, we conducted a broader quantitative comparison between DALI and hhPred, a highly sensitive sequence-based method. We identified 4,409 non-singleton sequence clusters that contained fewer than one-quarter of members with an Interproscan alignment. Of these clusters, 1,326 had a well-folded cluster representative with an average pLDDT of at least 70. We used DALI to align each of these structures against the PDB25 database, a sequence-clustered subset of the PDB provided by the DALI authors. In addition, we established a local version of hhPred, which is a two-step approach using HHblits and HHsearch, and used this pipeline to search the amino acid sequences of each of these proteins against the PDB. This analysis revealed that DALI was able to identify confident alignments for 661 out of 1,326 proteins, compared to just 295 by HHsearch (Extended Data Fig. 7e,f). Together, these data show that structural methods on proteins with high-quality structure predictions often outperform sequence methods at identifying similarities between viral proteins and other viral or non-viral proteins.

Discovery of cGAMP PDEs

Many aspects of eukaryotic and prokaryotic immunity have a shared origin. One set of related pathways are the mammalian cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)–STING and oligoadenylate synthase (OAS) pathways and prokaryotic cyclic-oligonucleotide-based anti-phage signalling systems (CBASS). In both cases, a protein sensor detects a viral cue and generates a nucleotide second messenger, which activates a downstream antiviral effector (Fig. 4a). In the case of the cGAS pathway, cGAS recognizes cytoplasmic dsDNA and generates 2′,3′-cGAMP. Many cGAS/DncV-like nucleotidyltransferases (CD-NTases) in prokaryotic CBASS systems make a similar second messenger, 3′,3′-cGAMP, in response to viral cues. By contrast, OAS recognizes double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and generates linear 2′,5′-oligoadenylates. In prokaryotes, phage T4 encodes the LigT-like PDE anti-CBASS protein 1 (Acb1), which degrades 3′,3′-cGAMP and a variety of other cyclic nucleotide substrates including 2′,3′-cGAMP.

In eukaryotes, several RNA viruses encode PDEs that degrade 2′,5′-oligoadenylates,. Notably, we find that these PDEs have a LigT-like fold similar to Acb1. Given the conserved use of LigT-like PDEs in viral anti-immunity, we investigated their distribution and phylogeny. Structural searches revealed that many different branches of LigT-like PDEs are present in eukaryotic viruses (Fig. 4b). Notably, there are multiple independent branches of LigT-like PDEs in RNA viruses. Linage A betacoronaviruses and toroviruses share a clade of PDEs that is similar to the PDEs present in rotaviruses. Surprisingly, lineage C betacoronaviruses contain a distinct branch of PDEs (Fig. 4b). This suggests that there were two independent PDE acquisition events within the betacoronavirus genus, showing the strong selective pressure for betacoronaviruses to evade the OAS pathway. We find that some large DNA viruses also contain LigT-like PDEs. Despite the extreme amino acid variability across the LigT-like PDE tree, there is near-universal conservation of the two catalytic histidines across viral LigT-like PDEs.

The presence of LigT-like PDEs in large DNA viruses raises the question of whether they have an anti-immune function. Whereas the RNA-sensing OAS pathway is commonly targeted by LigT-like PDEs of RNA viruses, there is likely to be less pressure for large DNA viruses to target OAS. Thus, we tested whether LigT-like PDEs encoded by large DNA viruses have activity against 2′,3′-cGAMP. First, we cloned and tested the expression of a panel of LigT-like PDEs, and found a subset that can be expressed well in mammalian cells (Extended Data Fig. 8a). Next, we generated a synthetic STING circuit in 293T cells (Fig. 4c). In this system, STING can be activated by treatment with cGAMP or the non-nucleotide STING agonist diABZI, which leads to expression of firefly luciferase in a STING-dependent manner. We expect that a viral LigT that targets cGAMP should be able to inhibit cGAMP- but not diABZI-mediated STING activity. Testing well-expressing LigTs revealed that LigT-like PDEs encoded by avian poxviruses have very potent activity against 2′,3′-cGAMP-mediated STING signalling but have limited activity against diABZI-mediated STING signalling (Extended Data Fig. 8b). Furthermore, mutation of the catalytic histidines of the LigT-like PDEs substantially reduces activity (Extended Data Fig. 8b). Next, we tested the activity of the pigeonpox LigT against a panel of cGAMP isomers, including 2′,3′-, 3′,3′- and 3′,2′-cGAMP. This revealed that, similar to T4 Acb1, pigeonpox LigT has widespread activity against diverse cGAMP variants (Fig. 4d).

To confirm that pigeonpox LigT degrades cGAMP variants, we purified wild-type and mutant (H72A/H167R) pigeonpox PDE and visualized cleavage of 2′,3′- and 3′,3′-cGAMP by TLC. Similarly to phage T4 Acb1 and unlike the 2′,5′-oligoadenylate-targeting LigT-like PDE NS2a from murine hepatitis virus (MHV), pigeonpox PDE cleaves 2′,3′- and 3′,3′-cGAMP (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, 2′,3′- and 3′,3′-cGAMP degradation by pigeonpox PDE and phage T4 Acb1 result in products that co-migrate on TLC, indicating a conserved mechanism of cGAMP hydrolysis by the two enzymes (Extended Data Fig. 8c). Avian poxviruses are notable for their lack of poxin,, the other 2′,3′-cGAMP PDE encoded by poxviruses, showing the strong selective pressure for poxviruses to evade cGAS–STING immunity. These results leave open the possibility that other lineages of LigT-like PDEs in large dsDNA viruses may have cGAMP activity. In sum, we have leveraged structure similarity to discover a novel mechanism of 2′,3′-cGAMP degradation by eukaryotic viruses and find that cGAMP targeting by LigT-like PDEs is a pan-viral mechanism of anti-immunity.

Discussion

Viruses have yielded fundamental insights into basic molecular biology. Here we cluster viral proteins and use structural alignments to gain functional insights that could not be obtained with prior approaches. We have raised testable hypotheses about the function of proteins present in human pathogens, and provide a resource for studying viral protein structures at scale. Expanding databases of structures and predicted structures will continue to enable functional inference. This is important not only from a fundamental biology perspective, but also in light of the continual emergence of novel viruses with pandemic potential. Structural similarity both with other viral proteins and with host proteins can offer functional insights and provide insight into the origin and evolution of viral proteins. A caveat of our study is the use of a stringent 70% coverage threshold during clustering. This means that some proteins with similar function but differences in domain configuration will be split into separate protein clusters, underestimating their taxonomic diversity. However, we find that structural alignment-based domain identification can identify shared structural repeats and enable comparison across protein structures. Both structure prediction and alignment have fundamental limitations. These structures are predictions, whose quality can vary and can be influenced by the depth of the MSA used for prediction. Structural alignments in turn can be affected by the arbitrary positioning of protein domains.

Protein structure is especially informative in cases of evolutionary distance. One impactful area is the concept of conserved viral anti-immunity. Emerging evidence on the common origin of some bacterial and eukaryotic immune systems raises the potential for conserved anti-immunity systems in eukaryotic viruses and phage. This is illustrated by LigT-like PDEs, which have been adapted multiple times by phage and eukaryotic viruses to evade innate immunity. This also illustrates the flexibility of core protein folds, as this conserved fold can be adapted to cleave distinct immune second messengers depending on the pathway being targeted. Together, our study lays the foundation for characterization of viral protein evolution and function across the virome.

Preparation of protein sequences

Protein sequences for eukaryotic viruses present in RefSeq were collected through the NCBI Viruses portal (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/virus) in July 2022. GenPept files were downloaded for viruses that were annotated by NCBI to have an eukaryotic host. Because not all viruses have a host labelled by NCBI, GenPept files of human-infecting viruses annotated by ViralZone (https://viralzone.expasy.org/678) were also downloaded. Finally, proteins from all coronaviruses present in RefSeq, regardless of NCBI-labelled host, were downloaded.

Each GenPept file was processed such that polyproteins with defined ‘mature peptide’ fields produced separate protein sequences for each mature peptide. GenPept files without a mature peptide field were output as full amino acid sequences. These processing steps are present in the vpSAT github directory (https://github.com/jnoms/vpSAT) in the process_gbks.py file. Proteins larger than 1,500 residues, or in some cases 1,000 residues, were excluded. Only 1,706 proteins were excluded for this reason.

Structure prediction

MSAs were generated with MMseqs2 release version b0b8e85f3b8437c10a666e3ea35c78c0ad0d7ec2. To increase MSA generation speed, the RefSeq virus protein database (downloaded on 6 June 2022) was used as the target database for MSA generation. Structures were predicted with ColabFold (downloaded 22 June 2022). The majority of samples used three recycles, three models, stop_at_score=70, and stop_at_score_below=40. MMseqs2 and Colabfold_batch were run with a Nextflow pipeline, and all parameters used can be found at https://github.com/jnoms/vpSAT. Information on all viruses and structures included in this manuscript is present in Supplementary Table 1.

Protein cluster generation

All proteins were initially clustered with MMseqs2, with a requirement of at least 20% sequence identity and 70% query and target coverage. MMseqs2 cluster mode 0 was used, meaning that many but not all pairs of aligned proteins are placed into the same sequence cluster. Predicted structures for each sequence cluster representative were subjected to an all-by-all alignment using Foldseek, requiring the alignment to consist of at least 70% query and target coverage and an alignment E-value less than 0.001. The resultant structural alignment file was then filtered using SAT aln_filter to keep alignments with a TMscore of at least 0.4. Clusters were generated from this alignment file using SAT aln_cluster in a similar manner as Foldseek cluster mode 1, wherein all query-target pairs are assigned to the same cluster. Cluster information from sequence and structure clustering were merged using SAT aln_expand_clusters. Taxonomic counts information was generated using SAT aln_taxa_counts, producing a ‘tidy’ table for each cluster_ID with the number of members of each taxon at multiple taxonomy levels. Taxonomy information was also added directly to the merged cluster file using SAT aln_add_taxonomy.

Cluster purity analysis

To determine the structural consistency of the clusters, all clusters with at least 100 members were selected for analysis. DALI was used to align the cluster representative with each cluster member. Clusters whose members were on average smaller than 150 residues were excluded. This led to the analysis of 49 clusters. Cluster members that failed to align to their representative were assigned a z value of 0. For each cluster, the average z-score between the representative and each member was determined and plotted. All scripts used to run DALI can be found in vpSAT’s dali_format_inputs.sh and dali.sh files. Dalilite version 5 was used. DALI output files were parsed into a tabular format using SAT’s aln_parse_dali.

Phylogenetics

Phylogenetic reconstructions were conducted using all sequence cluster representatives, or in the cases of clusters 56 and 735, all members within each cluster. For the nucleoside transporter tree, all herpesvirus sequence representatives of cluster 119, as well as a F. catus gammaherpesvirus 1 protein (YP_009173937) from a singleton cluster, were used as queries. Iterative sequence similarity searches against the NCBI non-redundant database were performed using standalone PSI-BLAST v2.15.0, using the following parameters: -num_iterations 10, -max_hsps 1, -subject_besthit, -gapopen 9, -inclusion_ethresh 1e-15, -evalue 1e-10, and -qcov_hsp_perc 70. For the LigT-like PDE tree, this search was restricted to only viral targets. Each of these protein sets were then clustered by utilizing mmseqs2 v15.6f452 with high sensitivity (command line option: -s 7.5) to compress the amount of highly similar sequences into cluster representatives. Subsequently, these sequence sets were aligned using Clustal Omega v1.2.4 with default settings. Comprehensive taxonomic information for each aligned sequence was integrated into the unique sequence identifiers by utilizing the biopython v1.81 package. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using IQTREE v2.3.3 with -m TEST -B 1000 options for model testing and bootstrapping. The best model was selected for each tree based on Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and were as follows: Nucleoside transporters, VT + F + G4; LigTs, VT + F + G4; cluster 28, VT + G4; cluster 55, VT + I + G4; cluster 56, VT + G4; cluster 735, VT + I + G4. Trees were visualized with the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL). Code used for this analysis can be found at https://github.com/Doudna-lab/nomburg_j-LigT_phylogeny.

Structural alignments against the AlphaFold databases

In Fig. 1i, Foldseek was used to align a protein representative from every viral protein cluster against 2.3 million protein cluster representatives from the AlphaFold database. For Fig. 3, all 67,715 viral protein structures were searched against the pre-made Foldseek databases of the original release of the AlphaFold database (downloadable via the Foldseek command ‘foldseek databases Alphafold/Proteome afdb tmp’), consisting of proteins from 48 organisms and including members of the bacterial, eukaryote, and archaeal superkingdoms. For this search, the full AlphaFold database of over 200 M structures was not used because it contains many viral proteins misannotated as non-viral proteins (these misannotations reflect errors in Uniprot metadata). Alignments were filtered to keep only those with a minimum TMscore of 0.4 and an E-value of less than 0.001.

DALI alignments of specific non-viral proteins against the viral protein database

Following Foldseek alignments against the AlphaFold database, specific hits of interest (for example, ENT4) were selected. These structures were downloaded and imported to the DALI database format using vpSAT’s dali_format_inputs.sh. They were then aligned against the full viral protein structure database using vpSAT’s dali.sh, which lists all parameters. Dalilite version 5 was used. DALI output files were parsed into a tabular format using SAT’s aln_parse_dali.

Identification of annotated protein sequence clusters

Each protein in the database was searched against the Pfam, CDD, and TIGRFAM databases using InterProScan. A sequence cluster was considered annotated if more than 25% of members had any InterProScan alignment, and was considered unannotated if otherwise. Note that some proteins without an InterProScan alignment have existing annotations through other methods, including manual curation. Values of RMSD in Fig. 3 were calculated using DALI.

DALI alignments to identify shared domains

This analysis used the structure representatives from clusters with at least 2 members, resulting in 5,700 cluster representatives. Structures from these representatives were imported to the DALI database format using vpSAT’s dali_format_inputs.sh. To compare eukaryotic virus protein cluster representatives, an all-by-all alignment was conducted using vpSAT’s dali.sh, which lists all parameters.

Dalilite version 5 was used. DALI output files were parsed into a tabular format using SAT’s aln_parse_dali. All DALI alignments were filtered for an alignment length of at least 120, and for a z-score greater than or equal to (alignment length/10) − 4.

MSA generation using the full ColabFold MMseqs2 database

We selected the protein cluster representatives from the top 100 protein clusters by size, as well as 100 randomly selected singleton clusters, for analysis. ColabFold was used with FASTA inputs, such that MSAs were generated using the MMseqs2 ColabFold server (which maps each sequence against UniRef, BFD and Mgnify), and this MSA was used for structure prediction.

Benchmarking sequence and structure methods

For all protein clusters with at least two sequence clusters, we conducted all-by-all alignments between members using MMseqs2 (version b0b8e85f3b8437c10a666e3ea35c78c0ad0d7ec2), DIAMOND blastp (version 0.9.14), or jackhmmer (version 3.1b2). These alignments and subsequent clustering occur separately for each protein cluster. From these alignments, we conducted connected-component clustering using sat.py aln_cluster. Here, all proteins that align will be assigned to the same resultant cluster. Thus, each original protein cluster (determined through our approach, combining sequence alignment with MMseqs2 and structure alignment with Foldseek) now has a set of clusters identified through each of the sequence-only methods. We then measured, for each original protein cluster, how many clusters created by each of the sequence-only methods and how many proteins fall into the largest cluster generated by these sequence methods.

For benchmarking virus–non-virus alignments, we conducted sequence alignments (again using MMseqs2, DIAMOND blastp, and jackhmmer) analogous to the DALI structural alignments present in Extended Data Fig. 4, using the same query against all viral proteins included in the dataset. We then determined the fraction of DALI-identified targets were identified for each non-viral query and through each sequence method.

For the comparison between hhPred and DALI, we identified 4,409 sequence clusters that contained more than 1 member and for which fewer than one-quarter of members had an InterProScan alignment. We then identified sequence cluster representatives that were well folded, with an average pLDDT of at least 70. This resulted in a final set of 1,326 proteins. We used DALI to align each of these proteins against the PDB25 database provided by the DALI authors. Alignments were considered high-confidence if they contained a z-score of at least 7. DALI alignments were conducted with vpSAT’s dali.sh. For hhPred searches, we established a local pipeline using HHsuite’s (v3.3.0) HHblits and HHsearch modules. For each query protein, we first used HHblits to align them against the Uniref30 HMM database provided by the HHsuite authors, using the flags -n 2 and -cov 20. We then used HHsearch to align each resultant MSA against the HHsuite-provided PDB database with the flag -cov 20. Alignments were considered high-confidence if they had an E-value of less than or equal to 0.001.

Searching the TCDB

We used a map of PDB accession to TCDB classification (https://www.tcdb.org/cgi-bin/projectv/public/pdb.py) to download all experimental structures associated with TCDB classifications. For subsequent processing, we used a maximum of five structures per TCDB classification. One structure was excluded (PDB: 1HXI) as it is highly truncated. Nine additional structures failed to import to DALI database files, typically due to small protein size. For PDB entries that contained multiple chains, we selected the first chain for alignment. Due to the absence of experimental structures, the AlphaFold models for ENT3 (AF-Q9BZD2-F1-model_v4) and ENT4 (AF-Q7RTT9-F1-model_v4) were added to the dataset. For the 46 protein structures with multiple classifications, one classification was chosen at random. This ultimately resulted in a dataset of 1,812 structures from 485 classifications, with an average of 3.7 structures per classification. Structures were imported to the DALI database format using vpSAT’s dali_format_inputs.sh. The predicted structure of EBV BMRF2 (YP_001129455) was aligned against this structure database using dali.sh.

PDE cloning and activity assays

Two tandem STREP2 tags, following a GGS linker, were appended to the end of each putative LigT-like PDE. Sequences were codon-optimized for humans, and gBlocks encoding each product were ordered from IDT and cloned into a custom lentiviral expression vector. PDE mutants have dual H>A mutations of the catalytic histidines (or, in the case of MHV NS2a and pigeonpox PDE, one H>A and one H>R mutation).

The 293T cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 20,000 cells per well. The 293T cells were kindly provided by the Ott laboratory, and were originally from ATCC. The 293T cells were screened for Mycoplasma within the last year, and were not otherwise authenticated. The day after plating, each well was transfected with 15 ng STING (pMSCV-hygro-STING R232, Addgene 102608), 20 ng firefly luciferase driven by an IFNB promoter (IFN-Beta_pGL3, Addgene 102597), 5 ng Renilla luciferase (pRL-TK, Promega E2241), and 20 ng of each putative PDE using the Mirus TransITX2 transfection reagent. After at least 4 h, cells were treated with 0.1 μM diABZI (Invivogen) or transfected with 10 μg ml−1 2′,3′-cGAMP (Invivogen) using TransITX2. The next day, firefly and Renilla luciferase were measured using the Promega Dual-Glo luciferase assay system. Three wells were transfected per condition, and experiments are representative of at least two independent experiments. The ‘no STING’ conditions were transfected with both reporters and a noncoding transgene, but no STING plasmid.

PDE western blots

The 293T cells were plated in 6-well dishes at 5 × 105 cells in 2 ml per well. The next day, each well was transfected with 200 ng of the indicated transgene using Mirus TransITX2. The following day, cells were lysed using RIPA buffer (ThermoFisher) supplemented with protease/phosphatase inhibitor (ThermoFisher), and lysate protein concentrations were determined using the Pierce BCA assay kit. All samples were then normalized to the same protein concentration. Bio-Rad Criterion 4%–20% acrylamide gels were loaded with 30 µg of protein per well, followed by transfer to a 0.2-µm nitrocellulose membrane. For visualization of the Strep-tagged PDEs, the Streptactin HRP (IBA 2-1502-001IAB) antibody was used (1:100,000 dilution, 1 h at room temperature). For visualization of GAPDH, we used Santa Cruz Biotech Mouse anti GAPDH (sc-365062) primary (1:1,000 dilution, incubation at 4 °C overnight) and ECL Anti-mouse IgG (Amersham NXA931) secondary (1:5,000 dilution, 1 h at room temperature).

Recombinant protein expression and purification

Expression plasmids for pigeon poxvirus PDE (wild-type and H72 A/H167R), MHV nonstructural protein 2A (NS2A), and T4 anti-CBASS protein 1 (Acb1) were cloned into custom pET-based vectors by Gibson assembly to yield N-terminal His10-MBP-TEV constructs. Proteins were expressed from 4 l Escherichia coli Rosetta 2 (DE3) pLysS by growing to an of OD600 of 0.4–0.6 in 2× yeast extract tryptone medium at 37 °C and induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside. After induction, cells expressing each protein were grown overnight at 16 °C to an OD600 of 1.2–1.4. Cells were collected by centrifugation for 20 min at 4,000 rpm at 4 °C and resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM imidazole, 2 mM MgCl2, 500 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM TCEP and Roche protease inhibitor. Cells were lysed by sonication and cell lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 17,000g, 4 °C for 0.5 h. The supernatant was bound to 5 ml Nickel-NTA affinity resin for 1 h at 4 °C. Supernatant was discarded and resin was washed 5 × 30 ml wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM KCl, 30 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol and 0.5 mM Tris(2-carboxyethhyl) phosphate). Protein was eluted in 10 ml elution buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM KCl, 300 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol, and 0.5 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphate). Each protein was concentrated to 10 mg ml−1 during buffer exchange to storage buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM KCl, 30 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol and 0.5 mM Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate) using a 10 kDa MWCO centrifugal filter (Amicon). A total of 5–15 mg target protein fused to N-terminal His10–MBP–TEV was stored at −80 °C.

In vitro characterization of PDEs

Recombinant enzymes were assessed for PDE activity by in vitro cGAMP degradation reactions and downstream analysis by TLC. Reactions were initiated by the addition of recombinant enzyme (40 μM) in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl) to 1.25 mM 2′,3′-cGAMP or 3′,3′-cGAMP (Biolog). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 18 h and stopped by vortexing for 20 s.

Silica gel TLC plates (5 cm × 10 cm) with fluorescent indicator 254 nm were spotted with 2 μl in vitro enzymatic reaction. Separation was performed in an eluent of n-propanol/ammonium hydroxide/water (11:7:2 v/v/v). The plate was allowed to dry fully and visualized with a short-wave ultraviolet light source at 254 nm.

Data analysis and plotting

All analysis, plotting, and statistical tests used R version 4.0.3. The genome type and average genome size were determined from information downloaded from the NCBI Virus portal (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/virus/vssi/#/).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-024-07809-y.

References 65

  1. 1.

    Paez-Espino D, et al. Uncovering Earth’s virome. Nature. 2016;536:425-430.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature19094

  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Koonin, E. V. et al. Global organization and proposed megataxonomy of the virus world. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.10.1128/mmbr.00061-19 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1128/mmbr.00061-19

  5. 5.

    Coulibaly F, et al. The birnavirus crystal structure reveals structural relationships among icosahedral viruses. Cell. 2005;120:761-772.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.009

  6. 6.

    Holmes EC. What does virus evolution tell us about virus origins? J. Virol. 2011;85:5247-5251.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02203-10

  7. 7.
  8. 8.

    Rost B. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 1999;12:85-94.

    Not in our library10.1093/protein/12.2.85

  9. 9.

    Terzian P, et al. PHROG: families of prokaryotic virus proteins clustered using remote homology. NAR Genomics Bioinformatics. 2021;3:lqab067.

    Not in our library10.1093/nargab/lqab067

  10. 10.

    Zayed AA, et al. efam: an expanded, metaproteome-supported HMM profile database of viral protein families. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:4202-4208.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btab451

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Lasso G, Honig B, Shapira SD. A sweep of Earth’s virome reveals host-guided viral protein structural mimicry and points to determinants of human disease. Cell Syst. 2021;12:82-91.e3.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cels.2020.09.006

  13. 13.

    Berman HM, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235-242.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/28.1.235

  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Steinegger M, Söding J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:1026-1028.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3988

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Xu J, Zhang Y. How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5? Bioinformatics. 2010;26:889-895.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066

  19. 19.
  20. 20.

    Holm, L. in Structural Bioinformatics: Methods and Protocols (ed. Gáspári, Z.) 29–42 (Springer, 2020).

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Krupovic M, Koonin EV. Multiple origins of viral capsid proteins from cellular ancestors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E2401-E2410.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1621061114

  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Yang M, Derbyshire MK, Yamashita RA, Marchler-Bauer A. NCBI’s Conserved Domain Database and tools for protein domain analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 2020;69:e90.

    Not in our library10.1002/cpbi.90

  25. 25.

    Haft DH, Selengut JD, White O. The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:371-373.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkg128

  26. 26.

    Pugh BF. Control of gene expression through regulation of the TATA-binding protein. Gene. 2000;255:1-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00288-2

  27. 27.

    Knutson BA, Liu X, Oh J, Broyles SS. Vaccinia virus intermediate and late promoter elements are targeted by the TATA-binding protein. J. Virol. 2006;80:6784-6793.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02705-05

  28. 28.

    Tsai K-N, et al. Doubly spliced rna of hepatitis B virus suppresses viral transcription via TATA-binding protein and induces stress granule assembly. J. Virol. 2015;89:11406-11419.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00949-15

  29. 29.

    Kinyanyi D, et al. In silico structural and functional prediction of African swine fever virus protein-B263R reveals features of a TATA-binding protein. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4396.

    Not in our library10.7717/peerj.4396

  30. 30.

    Greseth MD, et al. Molecular genetic and biochemical characterization of the vaccinia virus I3 protein, the replicative single-stranded DNA binding protein. J. Virol. 2012;86:6197-6209.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00206-12

  31. 31.

    Okano K, Mikhailov VS, Maeda S. Colocalization of baculovirus IE-1 and two DNA-binding proteins, DBP and LEF-3, to viral replication factories. J. Virol. 1999;73:110-119.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.73.1.110-119.1999

  32. 32.

    Hollis T, Stattel JM, Walther DS, Richardson CC, Ellenberger T. Structure of the gene 2.5 protein, a single-stranded DNA binding protein encoded by bacteriophage T7. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:9557-9562.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.171317698

  33. 33.

    Boys IN, Johnson AG, Quinlan MR, Kranzusch PJ, Elde NC. Structural homology screens reveal host-derived poxvirus protein families impacting inflammasome activity. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112878.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112878

  34. 34.

    Senkevich TG, Yutin N, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Moss B. Ancient gene capture and recent gene loss shape the evolution of orthopoxvirus–host interaction genes. mBio. 2021;12:e0149521.

    Not in our library10.1128/mbio.01495-21

  35. 35.

    Singh K, et al. The vaccinia virus H3 envelope protein, a major target of neutralizing antibodies, exhibits a glycosyltransferase fold and binds UDP-glucose. J. Virol. 2016;90:5020-5030.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02933-15

  36. 36.

    Mutz P, et al. Exaptation of inactivated host enzymes for structural roles in orthopoxviruses and novel folds of virus proteins revealed by protein structure modeling. mBio. 2023;14:e0040823.

    Not in our library10.1128/mbio.00408-23

  37. 37.

    Scutts SR, et al. DNA-PK is targeted by multiple vaccinia virus proteins to inhibit DNA sensing. Cell Rep. 2018;25:1953-1965.e4.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.034

  38. 38.

    Ember SWJ, Ren H, Ferguson BJ, Smith GL. Vaccinia virus protein C4 inhibits NF-κB activation and promotes virus virulence. J. Gen. Virol. 2012;93:2098-2108.

    Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.045070-0

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Burton EM, Gewurz BE. Epstein–Barr virus oncoprotein-driven B cell metabolism remodeling. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18:e1010254.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.ppat.1010254

All 65 references

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.