Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Reversible spin-optical interface in luminescent organic radicals

Sebastian Gorgon, Kuo Lv, Jeannine Grüne and 16 more

Nature · 2023 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06222-1

Abstract

Molecules present a versatile platform for quantum information science 1,2 and are candidates for sensing and computation applications 3,4 . Robust spin-optical interfaces are key to harnessing the quantum resources of materials 5 . To date, carbon-based candidates have been non-luminescent 6,7 , which prevents optical readout via emission. Here we report organic molecules showing both efficient luminescence and near-unity generation yield of excited states with spin multiplicity S > 1. This was achieved by designing an energy resonance between emissive doublet and triplet levels, here on covalently coupled tris(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl) methyl-carbazole radicals and anthracene. We observed that the doublet photoexcitation delocalized onto the linked acene within a few picoseconds and subsequently evolved to a pure high-spin state (quartet for monoradical, quintet for biradical) of mixed radical–triplet character near 1.8 eV. These high-spin states are coherently addressable with microwaves even at 295 K, with optical readout enabled by reverse intersystem crossing to emissive states. Furthermore, for the biradical, on return to the ground state the previously uncorrelated radical spins either side of the anthracene shows strong spin correlation. Our approach simultaneously supports a high efficiency of initialization, spin manipulations and light-based readout at room temperature. The integration of luminescence and high-spin states creates an organic materials platform for emerging quantum technologies.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 25, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Main

Considerable progress has been made towards designing molecular systems fulfilling the DiVincenzo criteria for practical qubits. Optical addressability has been demonstrated in organometallic complexes with triplet ground states at liquid helium temperatures. Related complexes show impressive spin coherence times, reaching the microsecond range at room temperature. Structures without metal atoms can be more immune to decoherence, and such fully organic molecules have been used in several demonstrations of quantum effects–.

Radical organic molecules contain unpaired electrons that can be stabilized by chemical design. Advances have been made using non-luminescent radicals that are covalently attached to chromophores, and such structures can support excited states with high spin multiplicity,. The presence of a radical can enhance the rate of intersystem crossing (ISC), leading to accumulation of chromophore triplet states. If exchange between the triplet (S = 1) and radical (S = 1/2) spin is larger than all other magnetic interactions, a distinct quartet (‘trip-quartet’, S = 3/2) and doublet (‘trip-doublet’, S = 1/2) state pair forms. If a second radical is additionally coupled, a quintet (‘trip-quintet’, S = 2) state can be achieved. High-spin states allow the building of dense architectures with multiple qubits hosted within a single manifold of spin sublevels. Such multilevel qubits, termed qudits, offer scaleability advantages in quantum computation. The qudit behaviour of quartet states was recently demonstrated in PDI-TEMPO at 80 K (ref. ). However, current high-spin structures have large (about 1 eV) energy gaps between the photogenerated chromophore singlet state and the triplet manifold,,. Critically, this prevents reverse ISC (RISC) to a luminescent state. Thus all organic high-spin systems with S > 1 to date are non-emissive, which makes optical readout impossible.

Whereas most stable radicals are non-emissive, there is now a class of luminescent radicals that offer fully spin-allowed emission within the doublet manifold. The set of available molecular structures and their optical wavelength range is expanding,. Record efficiencies for deep-red and infrared light-emitting diodes were recently reached in tris(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl) methyl (TTM) radicals linked to carbazole electron donors.

By utilization of a doublet (D1) level with substantial oscillator strength for absorption and emission, we can avoid excitation via the singlet state in radical-chromophore structures. In our designs we bring the triplet (T1) level into energy resonance with a D1 level on a luminescent radical. Eliminating the energy gap between photogenerated and high-spin states allows interconversion in either direction. This makes it possible to initialize and optically read out high-spin states with S > 1 in organic molecules.

Optical properties

We used TTM-1Cz as a luminescent radical unit ‘R’ because it shows 41% photoluminescence quantum efficiency (PLQE) for red emission in dilute toluene solution (Fig. 1a). Its small size allows proximity between the radical and chromophore. To achieve doublet–triplet energy resonance involving the emissive excited state with E(D1) = 1.82 eV, we selected anthracene with E(T1) = 1.83 eV (Fig. 1b) linked at its 9-position to the para-position of the TTM-1Cz carbazole, thus preserving through-bond conjugation (Supplementary Information Section 1). We prepared two ‘R-A’ monoradical structures (TTM-1Cz-An, and TTM-1Cz-PhAn with a bridging phenyl ring) and an ‘R-A-R’ biradical (TTM-1Cz)2-An. At room temperature their absorption spectra were only weakly modified and their photoluminescence (PL) showed a red-shift relative to TTM-1Cz (Fig. 1c). The PLQE in toluene solution was 32% for TTM-1Cz-An, 4% for TTM-1Cz-PhAn and 3% for (TTM-1Cz)2-An.

We performed transient optical absorption spectroscopy to establish the mechanism of interaction between radical and linked anthracene. We selectively excited the radical using a 600 nm pulse, well below the anthracene singlet absorption onset. In dilute solutions of R-A and R-A-R we observed rapid decay of D1 photoinduced absorption (PIA) and a matching rise of T1 PIA, indicating transfer of excitation from TTM-1Cz to the anthracene with local T1 character (Extended Data Fig. 1). This occurred with an ultrafast lifetime of 0.9 ± 0.2 ps in TTM-1Cz-An (Fig. 1d), 5.6 ± 0.6 ps in TTM-1Cz-PhAn and 0.7 ± 0.2 ps in (TTM-1Cz)2-An (Supplementary Fig. 11).

We focused on TTM-1Cz-An dynamics because it is the most emissive material. The prompt transient optical absorption spectra show that partial local triplet character was already present within our 150 fs time resolution. When solvent polarity was increased from cyclohexane to toluene there were no changes in rapid energy transfer dynamics and we extracted a 93% yield of T1 generation (Supplementary Fig. 12). Subsequently a new PIA near 685 nm appeared at around 30 ps, which we assigned to an intramolecular charge-transfer (CT) state because its spectral position matched the anthracene radical cation. The CT state population peaked at around 100 ps in toluene solution. In the more polar 2-methyltetrahydrofuran we observed complete non-radiative decay within 1 ns, likely via a low-lying CT state.

We performed time-resolved emission spectroscopy to understand how D1 emission is preserved despite rapid energy transfer dynamics. TTM-1Cz-An emission showed triexponential kinetics in toluene solution at room temperature (Fig. 1e), the emission line shape remaining unchanged throughout the decay (Supplementary Fig. 13). The fastest emission component (55 ± 1 ns) was twofold slower compared with the mono-exponential lifetime of TTM-1Cz in the same solvent (27 ± 1 ns). Most TTM-1Cz-An emission was delayed even further and occurred with a lifetime of 434 ± 5 ns. Because the D1 character was lost with near-unity yield well before the TTM-1Cz emission lifetime, all radical emission in TTM-1Cz-An was preceded by a temperature-activated process. The TTM-1Cz-An emission lineshape became more structured as temperature was lowered, resembling anthracene phosphorescence at 10 K (Supplementary Fig. 14). A vibronic progression was present in both excitation and emission scans at 77 K, similar to that of anthracene triplets (Extended Data Fig. 2). These features could signify a partial T1-like character of the photogenerated state.

We performed temperature-dependent, time-resolved emission spectroscopy in dilute poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) films (Extended Data Fig. 3). We found that total emission intensity strongly increased with temperature (Fig. 1f), in contrast to the temperature-independent intensity and rate of D1 emission in TTM-1Cz (Supplementary Fig. 15). Using an Arrhenius-type model we estimated the activation energy for emission in TTM-1Cz-An at approximately 30 meV. All R-A and R-A-R showed temperature-activated emission and structured phosphorescence at low temperatures (Supplementary Fig. 16). The activation energy for delayed emission in the (TTM-1Cz)2-An biradical was approximately 15 meV.

Spin properties

Our optical experiments show rapid generation of a local triplet character excited state followed by temperature-activated emission with D1 character. We used electron spin resonance (ESR) to probe the spin properties of the states involved in this mechanism. Continuous-wave ESR in the dark showed a narrow signal centred at g = 2.0036 for all four molecules studied (Extended Data Fig. 4), characteristic of a TTM D0 transition. We performed transient continuous-wave ESR (trESR) to track the excited-state sublevel dynamics following selective D1 excitation with a pulsed laser. At X-band in the half-field region, R-A showed signals centred at g = 4.04 and g = 6.20 (Fig. 2a). These are first-order forbidden transitions with changes in projection spin quantum numbers of Δms = 2 and Δms = 3, respectively, in which the latter gives clear evidence of probing a quartet state (Supplementary Fig. 17). In the full-field region, dilute frozen toluene solutions of R-A showed a broad Δms = 1 signal with a width of around 103 mT, superimposed with a narrow signal at g = 2.00 (Fig. 2b). Signal width was reduced by a factor of 2/3 compared with that expected from anthracene triplets (roughly 152 mT). This suggests that a quartet state was formed due to strong exchange between the anthracene triplet-like wavefunction and ground-state radical spin. Absence of level crossings in trESR at Q-band indicates that the R-A quartet–doublet energy gap was at least 0.8 meV (Extended Data Fig. 5). The polarization pattern inverted at later times, with inversion occurring faster at increasing temperature (Fig. 2c).

Using a transient nutation pulse sequence we can directly confirm the spin multiplicity of the sublevels involved in ESR transitions. In the dark, only the doublet nutation frequency (ω0) is detected for both R-A. Following 600 nm light excitation we found no contribution from triplet transitions (ω = √2ω0) across the entire spectra of R-A. The broad feature is due to ‘outer’ quartet transitions (ω = √3ω0), and the narrow central features are due to both ‘inner’ quartet (ω = 2ω0) and doublet (ω = ω0) transitions (Fig. 2d). This confirms that the strong exchange regime exists throughout the entire molecular ensemble, regardless of conformational effects.

The presence of strong exchange in R-A indicates that the anthracene–carbazole linkage supports significant wavefunction delocalization. In the symmetrically substituted (TTM-1Cz)2-An biradical, the full-field trESR spectrum was further narrowed (Supplementary Fig. 18). Its width of about 77 mT is consistent with the formation of a quintet state in the strong exchange regime. The polarization pattern shows an ISC population mechanism, as in R-A quartets. Transient nutation confirmed that the broad spectrum of (TTM-1Cz)2-An was due to quintet transitions (ω = √6ω0 or ω = 2ω0), and the narrow central feature was exclusively due to a doublet transition (Fig. 2e). We did not detect any quartet or uncoupled triplet features, which shows that triplet character excitation on the anthracene in R-A-R was strongly coupled to both radical electrons within an overall four-spin state.

Turning to the most luminescent TTM-1Cz-An, we have explored Rabi oscillation experiments to quantify its potential as a molecular qudit coupled to emission. We placed the quartet in a coherent superposition, which was then probed with a Hahn echo sequence (Fig. 2f). This allowed us to find the quantum fidelity, where Tm is spin coherence time and ωR is Rabi frequency. At 80 K, Tm is 1.5 ± 0.1 μs and ΩM values of up to around 70 were found, comparable to quartet states in non-luminescent molecules. The ΩM values scale linearly with microwave (mw) power, showing that this quartet state can be placed in an arbitrary superposition.

We modelled R-A trESR spectra to track sublevel population dynamics (Extended Data Table 1). The prompt signal showed a majority population of the quartet ms = ±1/2 sublevels at all temperatures (Fig. 2b). By fitting quartet polarization inversion times to an Arrhenius-type model we found an activation energy of 26 ± 5 meV for TTM-1Cz-An (Extended Data Fig. 5). This is in excellent agreement with the activation energy for emission found by optical spectroscopy, and confirms that D1 emission is preceded by RISC from the quartet state. The ms = ±3/2 sublevels formed the majority of the quartet population following inversion, consistent with a preferential depopulation of ms = ±1/2 sublevels during RISC.

Luminescent R-A mechanism

Our ESR results show that a complete description of the electronic states in R-A and R-A-R requires knowledge of their total spin multiplicity, as well as of the nature of the contributing anthracene-like and TTM-1Cz-like states (Fig. 3a). Multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) calculations for TTM-1Cz-An (Supplementary Information Section 3) show the photogenerated state as a transition between the HR and SR molecular orbitals. This state is similar to the D1 state in TTM-1Cz but, additionally, contains some wavefunction density on the linked anthracene in the HR molecular orbital (Fig. 3b). At ground-state equilibrium geometry, this state contains approximately 5% contribution on the anthracene (Supplementary Fig. 26) and lies 13 meV above states with local triplet character (Supplementary Fig. 21 and Supplementary Table 2). The calculations also show the presence of an intramolecular charge-transfer state (2CT) from the anthracene to the TTM-1Cz moiety that spans a broad energy range, from roughly 60 meV above the photogenerated state at the equilibrium geometry to about 20 meV below that state, for an orthogonal arrangement of the anthracene unit (Supplementary Table 5). We have developed a kinetic model for energy transfer that includes a 2CT intermediate (Supplementary Table 15). We computed energy transfer times spanning a 0.1–10 ps range when close to the ground-state equilibrium conformation. The calculated quartet state spin Hamiltonian parameters agree well with those extracted from modelling the ESR data (Supplementary Fig. 24 and Supplementary Table 9).

In the pure diabatic eigenstate description of R-A, absorption of light with energies below singlet anthracene band gap occurs from 2[D0S0] to 2[D1S0] ‘doub-doublet’ (Fig. 3c). This photoexcited state is energetically close to 2[D0T1], and rapid localization of the wavefunction onto the coupled anthracene occurs within a few picoseconds. Such high rates are possible because total spin multiplicity is conserved during 2[D1S0] to 2[D0T1] energy transfer. Subsequently the 2[D0T1] exciton undergoes ISC to the 4[D0T1] quartet state. Because the spatial wavefunctions of the 2[D0T1] and 4[D0T1] levels are nearly identical, the direct spin–orbit coupling matrix element is small (Supplementary Table 6). Direct ISC is thus unlikely to generate the high quartet yields on sub-20-ns timescales as implied by the observed emission dynamics. We consider that the 2CT state is close in energy to 2,4[D0T1] excitonic states. This is supported by solvatochromism observed in transient optical absorption and MCSCF calculations. Accessibility of a CT state might assist quartet state formation via spin–orbit coupling, which is larger for states of different character (Supplementary Table 8). The 2CT state can form from 2[D0T1] following spin-conserving electron transfer from LA onto SR. If a spin-flip occurs during back-transfer, the 4[D0T1] state forms. This forward mechanism is near barrierless and supports our observations of a high yield of quartet states at temperatures between 20 and 300 K. We can estimate quartet state yield using luminescence dynamics and PLQE, together with the T1 yield extracted from transient optical absorption. The yield of 4[D0T1] states in toluene solution of TTM-1Cz-An at room temperature is approximately 73%.

The process preceding emission is temperature activated. Due to low energetic barriers present in our molecular design, only around 22% of total emission yield is lost in TTM-1Cz-An compared with TTM-1Cz at room temperature. Reforming a spin doublet state from the quartet is the rate-limiting step due to the need for a change in spin multiplicity. We assigned the approximately 30 meV activation energy extracted from optical and trESR spectroscopy to 4[D0T1] → 2CT transfer. After the 2CT state is reformed, a hole transfer from anthracene onto the carbazole can rapidly yield the emissive 2[D1S0] state. At temperatures below 100 K, phosphorescence is observed. This can originate either from 4[D0T1] in a spin-forbidden process at the lowest temperatures or from 2[D0T1] in a spin-allowed process. The increase in phosphorescence intensity with temperature in this regime confirms that 4[D0T1] is the lowest energy excited state (that is, that the exchange is ferromagnetic).

The presence of a bridging phenyl in TTM-1Cz-PhAn led to a loss of PLQE because energy transfer (Supplementary Fig. 11), RISC and emission (Extended Data Fig. 3) are slow compared with TTM-1Cz-An. The observed PL red-shift could be due to a larger electron–hole separation in TTM-1Cz-PhAn, which leads to a less emissive state. Despite the greater spatial separation between the radical and anthracene, TTM-1Cz-PhAn remained in the strong exchange coupling regime (Extended Data Fig. 5).

The small energy offsets between excited states involved in this mechanism likely led to a high degree of mixing between states with overall doublet multiplicity (Fig. 3d), as indicated by calculated electronic couplings (Supplementary Table 12). We detected signatures of 2[D1S0] and 2[D0T1] mixing in both our ultrafast optical spectroscopy and low-temperature excitation scans. Although these effects were probably modulated by conformational reorganization, vibrational motion and environment dynamics, the quartet–doublet energy gap is always in the strong exchange regime as demonstrated by our ESR experiments. Therefore our system benefits from low energy offsets on the optical scales but large energy offsets on the magnetic scales. This enables access to robust, high-spin excited states coupled to an efficient emissive state.

Optical readout at room temperature

The luminescence of our materials opens the path toward optical readout in organic high-spin molecules, which we explored with optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) measurements. Dilute frozen toluene solutions of R-A at 10 K showed a broad, patterned full-field ODMR signal (Fig. 3e), matching quartet simulation parameters of trESR. As in trESR, we also observed half-field ODMR signals with Δms = 3 and Δms = 2 transitions at g = 6.17 and g = 4.23, respectively. To achieve readout at ambient temperatures we performed ODMR on dilute PMMA films of the two R-A molecules. Both TTM-1Cz-An and TTM-1Cz-PhAn films showed a clear ODMR contrast at room temperature (Fig. 3f and Extended Data Fig. 6). The resonant PL change in films at 295 K is comparable to that observed at 10 K. The dipolar parameters remained unchanged (Extended Data Table 1), confirming assignment to the quartet state. No ODMR signals were detected for TTM-1Cz, indicating identical emissive rates for ms = ±1/2 D1 sublevels in an isolated radical. The ODMR contrast in R-A is thus due to the 4[D0T1] origin of 2[D1S0] emission and demonstrates optical readout of the quartet state at room temperature.

To investigate the sign of the ODMR signal we performed transient ODMR (trODMR) measurements, which directly probe PL change in resonant conditions using digitizer detection. ODMR transients with application of 2 ms square microwave pulses at both full-field and half-field show a negative sign for all signals (Fig. 3e inset and Extended Data Fig. 6). Although at lower temperatures the quartet state is coupled to phosphorescence, at higher temperatures quartet depopulation occurs via RISC. The negative sign of the ODMR signal suggests that microwaves drive transitions from the more populated ms = ±1/2 to less efficiently linked ms = ±3/2 quartet sublevels, thus decreasing PL from the doublet state under resonant conditions.

As in ODMR, we observed spin-polarized quartet signals in room-temperature trESR on PMMA films of R-A (Fig. 4a). We additionally performed room-temperature pulsed ESR experiments (Extended Data Fig. 7). Quartet echoes were detectable up to 10 μs following photoexcitation at 295 K, further demonstrating the potential of these molecules as optically addressable qudits in the solid state.

Biradical ground-state control

The presence of two radical spins in luminescent R-A-R allows engineering of more complex ground and excited-state interactions. As shown above, the photophysical properties of the (TTM-1Cz)2-An biradical are analogous to TTM-1Cz-An, with ultrafast wavefunction localization onto the anthracene after light absorption followed by delayed emission. However, the biradical nature of R-A-R has significant consequences for spin properties compared with R-A monoradicals. In the R-A-R ground state the exchange interaction between the two D0 electrons is extremely weak (micro-electron volts or lower), as shown by the exclusively doublet transient nutation signals in the dark and temperature dependence of continuous-wave ESR intensity (Supplementary Fig. 19). This is consistent with the large spin–spin distance of 2.09 ± 0.19 nm determined by double-electron–electron resonance spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 20). Therefore, the biradical spin pair is uncorrelated in the ground state and the 1[D0S0D0] and 3[D0S0D0] states are degenerate, as in a true biradical.

Coupling between D0 electrons can be transiently switched on due to strong (around milli-electron volts) exchange within [D0T1D0] excited states, and we detected polarized 5[D0T1D0] quintet (trip-quintet) in room-temperature trESR (Fig. 4b). The absence of 3[D0T1D0] triplet (‘trip-triplet’) signals confirms that the quintet is the lowest excited state and is generated efficiently. Following relaxation back to the ground state, the spin information of D0 biradical electrons is preserved. This is evidenced by the long-lived g = 2.00 polarization extending beyond 30 µs at room temperature (Fig. 4c), well past any luminescence or quintet polarization. Such ground-state polarization is absent in R-A monoradicals.

To understand its origin we examined the energy level structure of R-A-R. Because singlet and triplet ground states are degenerate, both contribute to the forward process of quintet state generation (Fig. 4d). The singlet and triplet channels each provide an efficient, rapid, spin-conserving pathway to a [D0T1D0] state analogous to the doublet pathway in R-A. However, because quintet depopulation involves one spin-flip to access 3[D0T1D0] but two spin-flips to reach 1[D0T1D0], the triplet channel dominates the reverse process (Fig. 4e). Because the 3[D1S0D0] state can then quickly form and decay radiatively, this leads to an excess of 3[D0S0D0] ground state. Despite ground-state energetic degeneracy, this method allows for a preferential preparation of the triplet biradical configuration. Only following light-induced quintet generation and relaxation, the ground-state biradical consists of a spin-polarized pair of electrons that lose spin alignment with a long lifetime of 20 ± 1 μs at room temperature in solid films. This timescale matches the spin-lattice relaxation time of D0 electrons measured in pulsed ESR on the same (TTM-1Cz)2-An film at 295 K (Extended Data Fig. 7), and could be extended further by host engineering and deuteration.

Conclusions

Through our study combining optical spectroscopy, ESR, ODMR and theoretical modelling we have demonstrated that we can generate pure high-spin states in organic molecules, manipulate them and then read them optically (Fig. 3c). Using a luminescent radical and engineering an excited-state manifold with small energy offsets, we have shown a new pathway to generate high-spin states, here exemplified as a quartet or quintet. The radical can dress the triplet exciton in hybridized states that can reversibly access the high-spin manifold. Consequently, a luminescent state can be restored from addressable high-spin states. Remarkably, we observed polarized high-spin states via ESR and ODMR at room temperature in non-crystalline solid state, showing real potential for future applications such as quantum sensing.

Our approach of coherent manipulation of high-spin states coupled with emission complements insights gained from alternative qubit platforms such as colour centres—in particular, the diamond nitrogen vacancies in which optical spin polarization is also generated by excited-state intersystem crossing. Whereas nitrogen vacancy-negative centres show long spin coherence times at room temperature, their scaleability may be limited by the challenges of controlling defect placement and preventing decoherence in non-isolated defects. By contrast, molecules offer unparalleled chemical tunability due to a wealth of synthetic approaches and the potential to develop more extended spin structures, as demonstrated here by the behaviour of R-A and R-A-R. The scope for both chemical tuning and extension to polyradical structures opens new opportunities for designs of coupled spin systems that can be addressed with light, noting that their placement and intermolecular interactions can be controlled with self-assembly and scanning probe methods.

Transient absorption spectroscopy

Transient absorption experiments were conducted on a setup pumped by a regenerative Ti:sapphire amplifier (Solstice Ace, Spectra-Physics) emitting 100-fs pulses centred at 800 nm at a rate of 1 kHz and a total output of 7 W. Depending on the probed spectral range and timescales, different combinations of optical systems were used.

To collect sub-nanosecond dynamics in the visible range, frequency-doubled output of the amplifier was used to seed a home-built broadband non-collinear optical parametric amplifier (NOPA) tuned to output 530–750 nm pulses with a beta barium borate mixing crystal (Eksma Optics). Alternatively, to probe the infrared range the output of the amplifier was used to seed a home-built NOPA tuned to output 1,250–1,700 nm pulses with a periodically poled stoichiometric lithium tantalate mixing crystal. Following chirp-correction the white light output was split on a 50/50 beam splitter, focused to below 200 μm and used as the probe and reference beams. Wavelength-tuneable pump pulses were generated in a home-built visible narrowband NOPA. The pump and probe beams were spatially overlapped at the focal point using a beam profiler, with the pump spot diameter at least fivefold larger than the probe. Time resolution was achieved by the introduction of a stepped optical delay (Thorlabs DDS300-E/M) between pump and probe pulses, with a computer-controlled delay stage allowing for maximum delay of 1.9 ns and beam wander of the probe due to changing beam pointing minimized to below 5 μm using a beam profiler. Pump pulses were chopped at 500 Hz to enable shot-to-shot referencing, which accounted for intensity fluctuations in the amplifier. After passing through the sample, the probe and reference beams were dispersed with a grating spectrometer (Shamrock SR303i, Andor Technology) and simultaneously measured with charge-coupled device (CCD) detector arrays (Entwicklungsbüro Stresing).

To collect sub-nanosecond dynamics in the ultraviolet range, the output of the amplifier was used to seed a home-built broadband NOPA tuned to output 350–650 nm pulses generated by focusing the 800 nm fundamental beam onto a CaF2 crystal (Eksma Optics, 5 mm) connected to a digital motion controller (Mercury C-863 DC Motor Controller), after passing through a mechanical delay stage. The transmitted pulses were collected with a single-line scan camera (JAI SW-4000M-PMCL) after passing through a spectrograph (Andor Shamrock SR-163).

Transient PL spectroscopy

Time-resolved PL spectra were collected using an electrically gated intensified CCD (ICCD) camera (Andor iStar DH740 CCI-010) coupled with an image identifier tube after passing through a calibrated grating spectrometer (Andor SR303i). The spectrometer input slit width was 200 μm. Samples were excited using pump pulses obtained from a home-built narrowband NOPA driven by the same amplifier as the transient optical absorption setups. A suitable long-pass filter was placed directly in front of the spectrometer to avoid scattered laser signals entering the camera. The kinetics were obtained by setting the gate delay steps with respect to the excitation pulse. The gate widths of the ICCD were 5 ns, 50 ns, 500 ns, 5 μs and 50 μs, with overlapping time regions used to compose decays.

Temperature-dependent measurements were performed using a closed-circuit pressurized helium cryostat (Optistat Dry BL4, Oxford Instruments), a compressor (HC-4E2, Sumitomo) and a temperature controller (Mercury iTC, Oxford Instruments). The vacuum level inside the cryostat was below 10−5 mbar.

ESR

X-band ESR was acquired with either a Bruker Biospin E680 or E580 EleXSys spectrometer using a Bruker ER4118-MD5-W1 dielectric TE01δ mode resonator (around 9.70 GHz) in an Oxford Instruments CF935 cryostat. Q-band ESR employed an ER5106QT-2w resonator and a conventional 1.5 T electromagnet, as for X-band frequencies. The amplifiers for pulsed ESR (Applied Systems Engineering) had saturated powers of 1.5 kW at the X-band and 180 W at the Q-band. Temperature was maintained with an ITC-503S temperature controller and a CF-935SW helium flow cryostat (both Oxford Instruments).

For laser-induced transient signals, photoexcitation was provided by a tunable Ekspla NT230 operating at a repetition rate of 50 Hz. Laser pulse energies used were 0.5 – 1.0 mJ, with pulse lengths of 3 ns transmitted at roughly 40% through the cryostat, microwave shield and resonator windows. A liquid-crystal depolarizer (DPP-25, ThorLabs) was placed in the laser path for all measurements unless otherwise indicated. Triggering of the LASER and ESR spectrometer involved synchronization with a Stanford Research Systems delay generator, DG645. Quadrature mixer detection was used in pulsed- and continuous-wave detection.

Transient continuous-wave ESR spectra were simulated using EasySpin (Supplementary Information Section 2b). To account for the effective deviation from isotropic ordering due to magnetophotoselection effects we introduced an ordering term of the form

where Oθ and Oϕ are θ and ϕ angle ordering parameters, respectively; Oθ was set to zero in all simulations.

ODMR

Optically detected magnetic resonance experiments were carried out using a modified X-band spectrometer (Bruker E300) equipped with a continuous-flow helium cryostat (Oxford ESR 900) and a microwave cavity (Bruker ER4104OR, approximately 9.43 GHz) with optical access. Optical irradiation was performed with a 532 nm continuous-wave laser (Cobolt Samba CW 532 nm DPSSL) from one side-opening of the cavity. PL was detected with a silicon photodiode (Hamamatsu S2281) on the opposite opening, using a 561 nm long-pass filter to reject excitation light. The PL signal was amplified by a current/voltage amplifier (Femto DHPCA-100). For continuous-wave ODMR, PL was recorded by a lock-in detector (Ametek SR 7230) referenced by on–off modulation of microwaves with a frequency of 547 Hz. Microwaves were generated with a microwave signal generator (Anritsu MG3694C), amplified to 3 W (Microsemi) and guided into the cavity. For trODMR, PL was recorded by a digitizer card (GaGe Razor Express 1642 CompuScope) whereby a pulse blaster card (PulseBlasterESR-PRO) triggered the digitizer card and produced microwave pulses for a set length. Microwaves were generated with the same microwave signal generator as in continuous-wave ODMR, whereby they were amplified to 5 W by a travelling wave tube amplifier (Varian VZX 6981 K1ACDK) and guided into the cavity.

Theoretical calculations

The doublet ground-state 2[D0S0] and quartet 4[D0T1] of R-A monoradicals TTM-1Cz-An and TTM-1Cz-PhAn were optimized by means of unrestricted Kohn–Sham formalism within the density functional theory framework, using the ωB97X-D exchange-correlation functional and the 6–31G(d,p) basis set. In both 2[D0S0] and 4[D0T1] optimized structures, spin contamination was predicted to be negligible (less than 5%). The R-A-R biradical (TTM-1Cz)2-An ground-state 3[D0S0D0] was optimized with the same level of theory as described above. Broken-symmetry density functional theory calculations pointed to a degeneracy between the triplet 3[D0S0D0] and the broken-symmetry singlet ground-state 1[D0S0D0], which was found to lie less than 0.05 cm−1 above the 3[D0S0D0] configuration. These calculations were performed with Gaussian16 software.

To gain access to all relevant configuration state functions of R-A, state-averaged complete active-space, self-consistent field (CASSCF) calculations were performed on the optimized monoradical TTM-1Cz-An ground-state 2[D0S0] structure using the Def2-TZVP basis set. On top of a converged CASSCF wave function, strongly contracted second-order N-electron valence state perturbation theory (NEVPT2) calculations were performed to recover the missing dynamic electronic correlation at the CASSCF level. Because the CASSCF wave function is expanded in terms of Slater determinants computed in a restricted-open-shell formalism, both CASSCF and NEVPT2 methods provide excited states free from spin contamination. The same computational methods were applied to the optimized biradical (TTM-1Cz)2-An ground-state 3[D0S0D0] structure, using a smaller basis set (Def2-SVP) to reduce computational costs. Such calculations were run with ORCA 4.2 code.

Electronic couplings between the diabatic doublet states 2[D0T1], 2[D1S0] and 2CT of the monoradical TTM-1Cz-An were estimated via a diabatization procedure considering the Boys localization scheme, where adiabatic states were computed with the restricted active-space configuration interaction (RAS–CI) method, along with the Def2-SVP basis set within Q-Chem 5.4 software. In RAS–CI formalism the molecular orbital space is divided into three subspaces, RAS1, RAS2 and RAS3. The excited configurations are generated by an excitation operator acting on the restricted-open-shell Hartree–Fock reference wave function (ϕ0):

In the current RAS–CI implementation of Q-Chem 5.4, is defined aswhere generates all possible electronic configurations (singles, doubles, triples and so on) in the RAS2 subspace, corresponding to full CI treatment within the selected subspace; generates electronic configurations by promotion of single excitations from RAS1 to RAS2, creating n holes in the RAS1 subspace; analogously, generates electronic configurations by promotion of electrons from RAS2 to RAS3, thus creating m particles in RAS3. In our case RAS2 is built from 11 electrons in ten orbitals, allowing recovery of all relevant states (that is, 2[D1S0], 2/4[D0T1] and 2CT) predicted at the NEVPT2 level; RAS1 (RAS3) facilitates the creation of six holes (particles) whereas the remaining MOs remain doubly occupied (unoccupied). Like CASSCF and NEVPT2, the RAS–CI approach allows excited states free from spin contamination.

In the Boys localization scheme, the diabatic states are written as a linear combination of adiabatic states:

with the Γth diabatic state, NAdiab the number of adiabatic states, the Jth adiabatic state and the element of the rotation matrix from the adiabatic to the diabatic representation. With such a scheme, the electric dipole moment difference between each pair of diabatic states is maximized:

As a result we obtain the rotation matrix U, which transforms the Hamiltonian from a (diagonal) adiabatic to a (non-diagonal) diabatic representation. The matrix elements of the diabatic Hamiltonian represent either the diabatic state energy when Γ = ∆ or the electronic coupling between diabatic states when Γ ≠ ∆. Diabatization was carried out on top of RAS–CI excited states by systematically increasing its size—that is, increasing the number of adiabatic states. In 3 × 3 diabatization only the adiabatic states associated with 2[D1S0], 2[D0T1] and 2CT were considered, whereas for 9 × 9 and 17 × 17 the first nine and 17 adiabatic excited states were introduced, respectively.

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-023-06222-1.

References 45

  1. 1.

    Wasielewski MR, et al. Exploiting chemistry and molecular systems for quantum information science. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020;4:490-504.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41570-020-0200-5

  2. 2.

    Atzori M, Sessoli R. The second quantum revolution: role and challenges of molecular chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:11339-11352.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.9b00984

  3. 3.

    Yu C-J, von Kugelgen S, Laorenza DW, Freedman DE. A molecular approach to quantum sensing. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021;7:712-723.

    Not in our library10.1021/acscentsci.0c00737

  4. 4.

    Gaita-Ariño A, Luis F, Hill S, Coronado E. Molecular spins for quantum computation. Nat. Chem. 2019;11:301-309.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41557-019-0232-y

  5. 5.

    Awschalom DD, Hanson R, Wrachtrup J, Zhou BB. Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins. Nat. Photonics. 2018;12:516-527.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41566-018-0232-2

  6. 6.

    Quintes T, Mayländer M, Richert S. Properties and applications of photoexcited chromophore–radical systems. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2023;7:75-90.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41570-022-00453-y

  7. 7.

    Teki, Y. Excited-state dynamics of non-luminescent and luminescent π-radicals. Chemistry26, 980–996 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1002/chem.201903444

  8. 8.

    DiVincenzo DP. The physical implementation of quantum computation. Fortschr. Phys. 2000;48:771-783.

    Not in our library10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11<771::aid-prop771>3.0.co;2-e

  9. 9.

    Bayliss SL, et al. Optically addressable molecular spins for quantum information processing. Science. 2020;370:1309-1312.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abb9352

  10. 10.

    Bader K, et al. Room temperature quantum coherence in a potential molecular qubit. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5304.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms6304

  11. 11.

    Warner M, et al. Potential for spin-based information processing in a thin-film molecular semiconductor. Nature. 2013;503:504-508.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12597

  12. 12.

    Wang D, et al. Turning a molecule into a coherent two-level quantum system. Nat. Phys. 2019;15:483-489.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41567-019-0436-5

  13. 13.

    Filidou V, et al. Ultrafast entangling gates between nuclear spins using photoexcited triplet states. Nat. Phys. 2012;8:596-600.

    Not in our library10.1038/nphys2353

  14. 14.

    Oxborrow M, Breeze JD, Alford NM. Room-temperature solid-state maser. Nature. 2012;488:353-356.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11339

  15. 15.

    Giacobbe EM, et al. Ultrafast intersystem crossing and spin dynamics of photoexcited perylene-3,4:9,10-bis(dicarboximide) covalently linked to a nitroxide radical at fixed distances. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:3700-3712.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja808924f

  16. 16.

    Kollmar C, Sixl H. Theory of a coupled doublet-triplet system. Mol. Phys. 1982;45:1199-1208.

    Not in our library10.1080/00268978200100921

  17. 17.

    Teki Y, Miyamoto S, Nakatsuji M, Miura Y. π-Topology and spin alignment utilizing the excited molecular field: observation of the excited high-spin quartet (S = 3/2) and quintet (S = 2) states on purely organic π-conjugated spin systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:294-305.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja001920k

  18. 18.

    Leuenberger MN, Loss D. Quantum computing in molecular magnets. Nature. 2001;410:789-793.

    Not in our library10.1038/35071024

  19. 19.

    Moreno-Pineda E, Godfrin C, Balestro F, Wernsdorfer W, Ruben M. Molecular spin qudits for quantum algorithms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:501-513.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5cs00933b

  20. 20.

    Mayländer M, Chen S, Lorenzo ER, Wasielewski MR, Richert S. Exploring photogenerated molecular quartet states as spin qubits and qudits. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:7050-7058.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.1c01620

  21. 21.

    Rozenshtein V, et al. Electron spin polarization of functionalized fullerenes. Reversed quartet mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2005;109:11144-11154.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp0540104

  22. 22.

    Peng, Q., Obolda, A., Zhang, M. & Li, F. Organic light-emitting diodes using a neutral π radical as emitter: the emission from a doublet. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.54, 7091–7095 (2015).

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201500242

  23. 23.

    Matsuoka R, Mizuno A, Mibu T, Kusamoto T. Luminescence of doublet molecular systems. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022;467:214616.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214616

  24. 24.

    Li X, Wang Y-L, Chen C, Ren Y-Y, Han Y-F. A platform for blue-luminescent carbon-centered radicals. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:5367.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-33130-1

  25. 25.

    Ai X, et al. Efficient radical-based light-emitting diodes with doublet emission. Nature. 2018;563:536-540.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0695-9

  26. 26.

    Gamero V, et al. [4-(N-Carbazolyl)-2,6-dichlorophenyl]bis(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)methyl radical an efficient red light-emitting paramagnetic molecule. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:2305-2309.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.02.022

  27. 27.

    Khan ZH. Electronic spectra of radical cations and their correlation with photoelectron spectra. VI. A reinvestigation of two-, three-, and four-ring condensed aromatics. Acta Phys. Pol. A. 1992;82:937-955.

    Not in our library10.12693/aphyspola.82.937

  28. 28.

    Padhye MR, Mcglynn SP, Kasha M. Lowest triplet state of anthracene. J. Chem. Phys. 1956;23:588-594.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.1742551

  29. 29.

    Biskup T. Structure-function relationship of organic semiconductors: detailed insights from time-resolved EPR spectroscopy. Front. Chem. 2019;7:10.

    Not in our library10.3389/fchem.2019.00010

  30. 30.

    Köhler SD, Höfel S, Drescher M. Triplet state kinetics of anthracene studied by pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance. Mol. Phys. 2013;111:2908-2913.

    Not in our library10.1080/00268976.2013.776714

  31. 31.

    Mizuochi N, Ohba Y, Yamauchi S. A two-dimensional EPR nutation study on excited multiplet states of fullerene linked to a nitroxide radical. J. Phys. Chem. A. 1997;101:5966-5968.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp971569y

  32. 32.

    Moreno-Pineda, E., Martins, D. O. T. A. & Tuna, F. Molecules as qubits, qudits and quantum gates. In Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Vol. 27 (eds Chechik, V., Murphy, D. M. & Bode, B. E.) 146–187 (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2021).

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    El-Sayed MA. Triplet state. Its radiative and nonradiative properties. Acc. Chem. Res. 1968;1:8-16.

    Not in our library10.1021/ar50001a002

  34. 34.

    Chen M, et al. Singlet fission in covalent terrylenediimide dimers: probing the nature of the multiexciton state using femtosecond mid-infrared spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:9184-9192.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.8b04830

  35. 35.

    Grüne J, Dyakonov V, Sperlich A. Detecting triplet states in opto-electronic and photovoltaic materials and devices by transient optically detected magnetic resonance. Mater. Horiz. 2021;8:2569-2575.

    Not in our library10.1039/d1mh00999k

  36. 36.

    Abe M. Diradicals. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:7011-7088.

    Not in our library10.1021/cr400056a

  37. 37.

    Wozfowicz G, et al. Quantum guidelines for solid-state spin defects. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021;6:906-925.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41578-021-00306-y

  38. 38.

    Stoll S, Schweiger A. EasySpin, a comprehensive software package for spectral simulation and analysis in EPR. J. Magn. Reson. 2006;178:42-55.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmr.2005.08.013

  39. 39.

    Tait CE, Neuhaus P, Anderson HL, Timmel CR. Triplet state delocalization in a conjugated porphyrin dimer probed by transient electron paramagnetic resonance techniques. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:6670-6679.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.5b03249

  40. 40.

    Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01 (2016).

    Not in our library

All 45 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.