Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Algorithm for optimized mRNA design improves stability and immunogenicity

He Zhang, Liang Zhang, Ang Lin and 13 more

Nature · 2023 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06127-z

Abstract

Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines are being used to combat the spread of COVID-19 (refs. 1–3 ), but they still exhibit critical limitations caused by mRNA instability and degradation, which are major obstacles for the storage, distribution and efficacy of the vaccine products 4 . Increasing secondary structure lengthens mRNA half-life, which, together with optimal codons, improves protein expression 5 . Therefore, a principled mRNA design algorithm must optimize both structural stability and codon usage. However, owing to synonymous codons, the mRNA design space is prohibitively large—for example, there are around 2.4 × 10 632 candidate mRNA sequences for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This poses insurmountable computational challenges. Here we provide a simple and unexpected solution using the classical concept of lattice parsing in computational linguistics, where finding the optimal mRNA sequence is analogous to identifying the most likely sentence among similar-sounding alternatives 6 . Our algorithm LinearDesign finds an optimal mRNA design for the spike protein in just 11 minutes, and can concurrently optimize stability and codon usage. LinearDesign substantially improves mRNA half-life and protein expression, and profoundly increases antibody titre by up to 128 times in mice compared to the codon-optimization benchmark on mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 and varicella-zoster virus. This result reveals the great potential of principled mRNA design and enables the exploration of previously unreachable but highly stable and efficient designs. Our work is a timely tool for vaccines and other mRNA-based medicines encoding therapeutic proteins such as monoclonal antibodies and anti-cancer drugs 7,8 .

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 58

  1. 1.

    Baden LR, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:403-416.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2035389

  2. 2.

    Polack FP, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:2603-2615.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2034577

  3. 3.

    Gebre MS, et al. Optimization of non-coding regions for a non-modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Nature. 2022;601:410-414.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-04231-6

  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    Hall, K. B. Best-First Word-Lattice Parsing: Techniques for Integrated Syntactic Language Modeling. PhD thesis, Brown Univ. (2005).

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Schlake T, et al. mRNA: a novel avenue to antibody therapy? Mol. Ther. 2019;27:773-784.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.03.002

  8. 8.

    Reinhard K, et al. An RNA vaccine drives expansion and efficacy of claudin-CAR-T cells against solid tumors. Science. 2020;367:446-453.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aay5967

  9. 9.

    Wolff JA, et al. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science. 1990;247:1465-1468.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1690918

  10. 10.

    Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D. mRNA vaccines—a new era in vaccinology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018;17:261-279.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2017.243

  11. 11.

    Mauro VP, Chappell SA. A critical analysis of codon optimization in human therapeutics. Trends Mol. Med. 2014;20:604-13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmed.2014.09.003

  12. 12.

    Gustafsson C, Govindarajan S, Minshull J. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22:346-353.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.006

  13. 13.

    Nabiyouni M, Prakash A, Fedorov A. Vertebrate codon bias indicates a highly GC-rich ancestral genome. Gene. 2013;519:113-119.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2013.01.033

  14. 14.

    Sahin U, Karikó K, Türeci Ö. mRNA-based therapeutics—developing a new class of drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014;13:759-780.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd4278

  15. 15.

    Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M, Turner DH. Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;288:911-940.

    Not in our library10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700

  16. 16.

    Mathews DH, et al. Incorporating chemical modification constraints into a dynamic programming algorithm for prediction of RNA secondary structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:7287-7292.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0401799101

  17. 17.

    Sharp PM, Li WH. The codon adaptation index–a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:1281-1295.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/15.3.1281

  18. 18.

    Durbin, R., Eddy, S. R., Krogh, A. & Mitchison G. Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998).

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Bar-Hillel Y, Perles M, Shamir E. On formal properties of simple phrase structure grammars. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung. 1961;14:143-172.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Nederhof, M. J. & Satta, G. Probabilistic parsing as intersection. In Proc. 8th International Conference on Parsing Technologies 137–148 (2003).

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Huang L, et al. LinearFold: linear-time approximate RNA folding by 5′-to-3′ dynamic programming and beam search. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:i295-i304.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btz375

  22. 22.

    Cohen B, Skiena S. Natural selection and algorithmic design of mRNA. J. Comput. Biol. 2003;10:419-432.

    Not in our library10.1089/10665270360688101

  23. 23.

    Terai G, Kamegai S, Asai K. CDSfold: an algorithm for designing a protein-coding sequence with the most stable secondary structure. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:828-834.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv678

  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    Huang, L. & Sagae, K. Dynamic programming for linear-time incremental parsing. In Proc. 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 1077–1086 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010).

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Yang R, et al. A core-shell structured COVID-19 mRNA vaccine with favorable biodistribution pattern and promising immunity. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021;6:213.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41392-021-00634-z

  27. 27.

    Liu L, et al. Structural basis of Toll-like receptor 3 signaling with double-stranded RNA. Science. 2008;320:379-381.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1155406

  28. 28.

    Mignone F, Gissi C, Liuni S, Pesole G. Untranslated regions of mRNAs. Genome Biol. 2002;3:reviews0004.1.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2002-3-3-reviews0004

  29. 29.
  30. 30.

    Rana MM. Polymer-based nano-therapies to combat COVID-19 related respiratory injury: progress, prospects, and challenges. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2021;32:1219-1249.

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2021.1909412

  31. 31.

    Wrapp D, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260-1263.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abb2507

  32. 32.

    Cunningham AL, et al. Efficacy of the herpes zoster subunit vaccine in adults 70 years of age or older. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1019-1032.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1603800

  33. 33.

    Raab D, Graf M, Notka F, Schödl T, Wagner R. The GeneOptimizer algorithm: using a sliding window approach to cope with the vast sequence space in multiparameter DNA sequence optimization. Syst. Synth. Biol. 2010;4:215-225.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11693-010-9062-3

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Hie B, Zhong ED, Berger B, Bryson B. Learning the language of viral evolution and escape. Science. 2021;371:284-288.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abd7331

  36. 36.

    Madani A., et al. Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families. Nat. Biotechnol.10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 (2023).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2

  37. 37.

    Karikó K, Buckstein M, Ni H, Weissman D. Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA. Immunity. 2005;23:165-175.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008

  38. 38.

    Karikó K, et al. Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability. Mol. Ther. 2008;16:1833-1840.

    Not in our library10.1038/mt.2008.200

  39. 39.

    Rivas E. The four ingredients of single-sequence RNA secondary structure prediction. a unifying perspective. RNA Biol. 2013;10:1185-1196.

    Not in our library10.4161/rna.24971

  40. 40.

    Nussinov R, Jacobson AB. Fast algorithm for predicting the secondary structure of single-stranded RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1980;77:6309-6313.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.77.11.6309

All 58 references

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.