Six reference-quality genomes reveal evolution of bat adaptations

Abstract

Bats possess extraordinary adaptations, including flight, echolocation, extreme longevity and unique immunity. High-quality genomes are crucial for understanding the molecular basis and evolution of these traits. Here we incorporated long-read sequencing and state-of-the-art scaffolding protocols 1 to generate, to our knowledge, the first reference-quality genomes of six bat species ( Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , Rousettus aegyptiacus , Phyllostomus discolor , Myotis myotis , Pipistrellus kuhlii and Molossus molossus ). We integrated gene projections from our ‘Tool to infer Orthologs from Genome Alignments’ (TOGA) software with de novo and homology gene predictions as well as short- and long-read transcriptomics to generate highly complete gene annotations. To resolve the phylogenetic position of bats within Laurasiatheria, we applied several phylogenetic methods to comprehensive sets of orthologous protein-coding and noncoding regions of the genome, and identified a basal origin for bats within Scrotifera. Our genome-wide screens revealed positive selection on hearing-related genes in the ancestral branch of bats, which is indicative of laryngeal echolocation being an ancestral trait in this clade. We found selection and loss of immunity-related genes (including pro-inflammatory NF-κB regulators) and expansions of anti-viral APOBEC3 genes, which highlights molecular mechanisms that may contribute to the exceptional immunity of bats. Genomic integrations of diverse viruses provide a genomic record of historical tolerance to viral infection in bats. Finally, we found and experimentally validated bat-specific variation in microRNAs, which may regulate bat-specific gene-expression programs. Our reference-quality bat genomes provide the resources required to uncover and validate the genomic basis of adaptations of bats, and stimulate new avenues of research that are directly relevant to human health and disease 1 .

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 97

1. 1.

   Teeling EC, et al. Bat biology, genomes, and the Bat1K project: to generate chromosome-level genomes for all living bat species. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2018;6:23-46.

   Not in our library10.1146/annurev-animal-022516-022811

2. 2.

   Simmons, N. B. & Cirranello, A. L. Bat Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Database, https://batnames.org/ (2020).

   Not in our library

3. 3.
   Novel Insights Into Immune Systems of Bats · 2020

   No notice
4. 4.

   Huang Z, et al. Longitudinal comparative transcriptomics reveals unique mechanisms underlying extended healthspan in bats. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019;3:1110-1120.

   Not in our library10.1038/s41559-019-0913-3

5. 5.

   Vernes SC, Wilkinson GS. Behaviour, biology and evolution of vocal learning in bats. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2020;375:20190061.

   Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2019.0061

6. 6.

   Jones G, Teeling EC, Rossiter SJ. From the ultrasonic to the infrared: molecular evolution and the sensory biology of bats. Front. Physiol. 2013;4:117.

   Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2013.00117

7. 7.

   Teeling EC, et al. A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science. 2005;307:580-584.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1105113

8. 8.
   Recurrent evolution of extreme longevity in bats · 2019

   No notice
9. 9.

   Nowoshilow S, et al. The axolotl genome and the evolution of key tissue formation regulators. Nature. 2018;554:50-55.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature25458

10. 10.

    Tischler, G. in Computational Intelligence Methods for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics (CIBB 2017) (eds Bartoletti, M. et al.) 103–114 (Springer, 2019).

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Tischler, G. & Myers, E. W. Non hybrid long read consensus using local de Bruijn graph assembly. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/106252v1 (2017).

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Dong D, et al. The genomes of two bat species with long constant frequency echolocation calls. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017;34:20-34.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msw231

13. 13.

    Eckalbar WL, et al. Transcriptomic and epigenomic characterization of the developing bat wing. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:528-536.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3537

14. 14.

    Parker J, et al. Genome-wide signatures of convergent evolution in echolocating mammals. Nature. 2013;502:228-231.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12511

15. 15.

    Pavlovich SS, et al. The Egyptian Rousette genome reveals unexpected features of bat antiviral immunity. Cell. 2018;173:1098-1110.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.070

16. 16.

    Seim I, et al. Genome analysis reveals insights into physiology and longevity of the Brandt’s bat Myotis brandtii. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2212.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms3212

17. 17.

    Wen M, et al. Exploring the genome and transcriptome of the cave nectar bat Eonycteris spelaea with PacBio long-read sequencing. Gigascience. 2018;7:giy116.

    Not in our library10.1093/gigascience/giy116

18. 18.
    Hologenomic adaptations underlying the evolution of sanguivory in the common vampire bat · 2018

    No notice
19. 19.

    Zhang G, et al. Comparative analysis of bat genomes provides insight into the evolution of flight and immunity. Science. 2013;339:456-460.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1230835

20. 20.

    Bejerano G, et al. Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science. 2004;304:1321-1325.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1098119

21. 21.

    Nature Biotechnology Editorial. A reference standard for genome biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:1121.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.4318

22. 22.
    BUSCO Applications from Quality Assessments to Gene Prediction and Phylogenomics · 2017

    No notice
23. 23.

    Pace JK, Feschotte C. The evolutionary history of human DNA transposons: evidence for intense activity in the primate lineage. Genome Res. 2007;17:422-432.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.5826307

24. 24.

    Foley NM, Springer MS, Teeling EC. Mammal madness: is the mammal tree of life not yet resolved? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2016;371:20150140.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2015.0140

25. 25.

    Doronina L, et al. Speciation network in Laurasiatheria: retrophylogenomic signals. Genome Res. 2017;27:997-1003.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.210948.116

26. 26.

    Springer, M. S. & Gatesy, J. An ABBA-BABA test for introgression using retroposon insertion data. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/709477v1 (2019).

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:587-589.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.4285

28. 28.

    Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268-274.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msu300

29. 29.
    The Interrelationships of Placental Mammals and the Limits of Phylogenetic Inference · 2016

    No notice
30. 30.

    Springer MS, Gatesy J. On the importance of homology in the age of phylogenomics. Syst. Biodivers. 2018;16:210-228.

    Not in our library10.1080/14772000.2017.1401016

31. 31.

    Nishihara H, Hasegawa M, Okada N. Pegasoferae, an unexpected mammalian clade revealed by tracking ancient retroposon insertions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:9929-9934.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0603797103

32. 32.

    Tsagkogeorga G, Parker J, Stupka E, Cotton JA, Rossiter SJ. Phylogenomic analyses elucidate the evolutionary relationships of bats. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:2262-2267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.014

33. 33.

    Jermiin LS, Poladian L, Charleston MA. Is the “Big Bang” in animal evolution real? Science. 2005;310:1910-1911.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1122440

34. 34.
    Resolving Difficult Phylogenetic Questions: Why More Sequences Are Not Enough · 2011

    No notice
35. 35.

    Ho SY, Jermiin L. Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data. Syst. Biol. 2004;53:623-637.

    Not in our library10.1080/10635150490503035

36. 36.

    Jermiin LS, Catullo RA, Holland BR. A new phylogenetic protocol: dealing with model misspecification and confirmation bias in molecular phylogenetics. NAR Genom. Bioinf. 2020;2:lqaa041.

    Not in our library10.1093/nargab/lqaa041

37. 37.

    Chou J, et al. A comparative study of SVDquartets and other coalescent-based species tree estimation methods. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:S2.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2164-16-s10-s2

38. 38.

    Smith MD, et al. Less is more: an adaptive branch-site random effects model for efficient detection of episodic diversifying selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:1342-1353.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msv022

39. 39.

    Pond SL, Frost SD, Muse SV. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:676-679.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bti079

40. 40.

    Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007;24:1586-1591.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msm088

Cited by papers we hold 5

• A beginner’s guide to manual curation of transposable elements · 2022
  Corrected
• DNA methylation predicts age and provides insight into exceptional longevity of bats · 2021
  Corrected
• Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species · 2021
  No notice
• Common ground: The foundation of interdisciplinary research on bat disease emergence. · 2020
  Not checked
• Novel Insights Into Immune Systems of Bats · 2020
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.