Perspectives on ENCODE

Abstract

The Encylopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Project launched in 2003 with the long-term goal of developing a comprehensive map of functional elements in the human genome. These included genes, biochemical regions associated with gene regulation (for example, transcription factor binding sites, open chromatin, and histone marks) and transcript isoforms. The marks serve as sites for candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) that may serve functional roles in regulating gene expression1. The project has been extended to model organisms, particularly the mouse. In the third phase of ENCODE, nearly a million and more than 300,000 cCRE annotations have been generated for human and mouse, respectively, and these have provided a valuable resource for the scientific community. The authors summarize the history of the ENCODE Project, the achievements of ENCODE 1 and ENCODE 2, and how the new data generated and analysed in ENCODE 3 complement the previous phases.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 43

1. 1.

   Kellis M, et al. Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:6131-6138.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1318948111

2. 2.

   ENCODE Project Consortium. The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) Project. Science. 2004;306:636-640.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1105136

3. 3.

   Lindblad-Toh K, et al. A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals. Nature. 2011;478:476-482.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature10530

4. 4.

   Waterston RH, et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002;420:520-562.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature01262

5. 5.
   A User's Guide to the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) · 2011

   No notice
6. 6.

   Birney E, et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799-816.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature05874

7. 7.

   ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57-74.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature11247

8. 8.
   Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes · 2020

   Corrected
9. 9.
   Occupancy maps of 208 chromatin-associated proteins in one human cell type · 2020

   No notice
10. 10.
    Index and biological spectrum of human DNase I hypersensitive sites · 2020

    No notice
11. 11.
    Global reference mapping of human transcription factor footprints · 2020

    No notice
12. 12.

    Breschi, A. et al. A limited set of transcriptional programs define major cell types. Preprint at 10.1101/857169 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.263186.120

13. 13.
    Landscape of cohesin-mediated chromatin loops in the human genome · 2020

    No notice
14. 14.
    A large-scale binding and functional map of human RNA-binding proteins · 2020

    Corrected
15. 15.

    Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:57-63.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg2484

16. 16.

    Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-seq. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:621-628.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1226

17. 17.

    Johnson DS, Mortazavi A, Myers RM, Wold B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein–DNA interactions. Science. 2007;316:1497-1502.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1141319

18. 18.

    Robertson G, et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Methods. 2007;4:651-657.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth1068

19. 19.

    Iyer VR, et al. Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF. Nature. 2001;409:533-538.

    Not in our library10.1038/35054095

20. 20.

    Ren B, et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science. 2000;290:2306-2309.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.290.5500.2306

21. 21.

    Landt SG, et al. ChIP–seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res. 2012;22:1813-1831.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.136184.111

22. 22.

    Sundararaman B, et al. Resources for the comprehensive discovery of functional RNA elements. Mol. Cell. 2016;61:903-913.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.012

23. 23.

    Maurano MT, et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science. 2012;337:1190-1195.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1222794

24. 24.

    Schaub MA, Boyle AP, Kundaje A, Batzoglou S, Snyder M. Linking disease associations with regulatory information in the human genome. Genome Res. 2012;22:1748-1759.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.136127.111

25. 25.

    Yue F, et al. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature. 2014;515:355-364.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13992

26. 26.

    Gerstein MB, et al. Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project. Science. 2010;330:1775-1787.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1196914

27. 27.

    The modENCODE Consortium, et al. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science. 2010;330:1787-1797.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1198374

28. 28.

    Kudron MM, et al. The ModERN Resource: genome-wide binding profiles for hundreds of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans transcription factors. Genetics. 2018;208:937-949.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.117.300657

29. 29.
    An atlas of dynamic chromatin landscapes in mouse fetal development · 2020

    Corrected
30. 30.
    The changing mouse embryo transcriptome at whole tissue and single-cell resolution · 2020

    No notice
31. 31.
    Spatiotemporal DNA methylome dynamics of the developing mouse fetus · 2020

    No notice
32. 32.

    Cheng Y, et al. Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human. Nature. 2014;515:371-375.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13985

33. 33.
    Cooperativity and Rapid Evolution of Cobound Transcription Factors in Closely Related Mammals · 2013

    No notice
34. 34.

    Keilwagen J, Posch S, Grau J. Accurate prediction of cell type-specific transcription factor binding. Genome Biol. 2019;20:9.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13059-018-1614-y

35. 35.

    Tang F, Lao K, Surani MA. Development and applications of single-cell transcriptome analysis. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:S6-S11.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1557

36. 36.

    Buenrostro JD, et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature. 2015;523:486-490.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14590

37. 37.
    The human body at cellular resolution: the NIH Human Biomolecular Atlas Program · 2019

    No notice
38. 38.
    The Human Cell Atlas · 2017

    No notice
39. 39.
    PacBio Sequencing and its Applications · 2015

    No notice
40. 40.

    Arnold CD, et al. Genome-wide quantitative enhancer activity maps identified by STARR-seq. Science. 2013;339:1074-1077.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1232542

41. 41.

    Klein JC, Chen W, Gasperini M, Shendure J. Identifying novel enhancer elements with CRISPR-based screens. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018;13:326-332.

    Not in our library10.1021/acschembio.7b00778

42. 42.

    Harrow J, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res. 2012;22:1760-1774.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.135350.111

43. 43.

    Paudyal A, et al. The novel mouse mutant, chuzhoi, has disruption of Ptk7 protein and exhibits defects in neural tube, heart and lung development and abnormal planar cell polarity in the ear. BMC Dev. Biol. 2010;10:87.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-213x-10-87

Cited by papers we hold 5

• Cooperation between bHLH transcription factors and histones for DNA access · 2023
  No notice
• Perspectives on the Genetic Associations of Ankylosing Spondylitis · 2021
  Not checked
• Functional annotations of three domestic animal genomes provide vital resources for comparative and agricultural research · 2021
  No notice
• Biologically relevant transfer learning improves transcription factor binding prediction · 2021
  Not checked
• Deciphering osteoarthritis genetics across 826,690 individuals from 9 populations · 2021
  Corrected

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.